mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-05 03:51:54 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
d7283e8757
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip keeps agent work attached to saved company records. > - Agent Chat keeps one conversation for each person and agent. > - Reload must preserve context without starting another turn. > - The ordinary `/new` command must create fresh provider context and preserve history. > - Existing local chat journeys cover these behaviors, but the deployment-targeted daily catalog does not. > - This PR adds one reusable journey with independent saved-state and rendered-reply checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #2242, #18655. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Product E2E coverage for Agent Chat persistence and session reset on an attached deployment. **Current behavior** The deployment-targeted catalog has no bounded check for recall after reopening and a fresh session in the same saved conversation. **Proposed behavior** Remember a random phrase, reopen and reload the chat, then ask for the phrase without supplying it. Send `/new` through the ordinary composer. Require a new native session and a fresh-context answer while the original chat and history remain saved. ## What Changed - Add the `chat-continuity` flow and independent evidence grader. - Reuse the existing chat sender and run-bound native reply reader. - Require exact board-user message attribution, three successful native provider turns and one synthetic reset row. Count all four persisted run IDs. A reset with provider input or a native session cannot pass as synthetic work. - Use the original bound issue-run summary to prove reset completion when the detail result is null or compact. Preserve the raw detail and require its reset context, company, agent, issue and wake comment to agree. Native provider turns require committed native state and independent output evidence; an optional duplicate result field is not required. - Require an empty agent-filtered run history before the first send. Reused agents are unsupported for this case. Validate every agent-scoped activity row and reject mixed or truncated responses; do not filter global history into a pass. - Require the fresh native detail to contain an explicit null `sessionIdBefore`. Missing or empty admission evidence cannot prove a fresh provider session. Keep optional result blobs optional. - Check provider, model, environment, native session, finalization and reset generation. Reject stale replies, duplicate sends, extra runs, missing history and unexpected work. - Permit authenticated chat screenshots through the existing same-origin and mounted-Layout guard. Authentication and unrelated settings pages remain excluded. - Register the case, exact checks, source hash inputs, discovery and documentation. Feature-map files are unchanged. ## Verification - Normal merge commit `ddc37bb05b87cbc1fa449e4b2fc5a4677f0fe3b6` has exactly two real parents: the staging-qualified chat source `4c6cc9d67d2ae577e3a8ae7856bd6ae22a8489c1` and lifecycle squash `8771606fd87f69ed4057779e3dce3a9bca8088e6` from #18782. Thirteen dedicated case, support and reused runtime/oracle files are byte-for-byte preserved. The eight shared registry placements match the finite integration forecast. The nine required checks and four-run limit are unchanged. - The integrated source passes 99 focused tests across three files and 925 related Product E2E/catalog/native-reply tests across 42 files. Credential-free discovery lists 22 unique journeys, including chat and lifecycle exactly once. The PR diff against the actual lifecycle squash passes its whitespace check and remains the original 17 chat paths. - The current canonical `node scripts/typecheck-test-projects.mjs --low-memory tests/runner-e2e` passes, including Runner TypeScript and server declaration prerequisites. The DB migration checks and build pass against the actual squash's execution-admission schema and migration 0428. No Rust build was run locally. Canonical generated outputs are bound to current tracked inputs and were rechecked after tests. - The first direct typecheck found a stale generated Runner export, `taskDocumentKeySchema`; the current canonical prerequisites resolved it. A frozen offline install lacked a cached locked tarball, and an initial child command reached the global pnpm version switch and failed signature retrieval. Fetching only locked packages and pinning child pnpm to 9.15.4 corrected the setup. The original diagnostics remain retained; no tracked source was changed to bypass them. - The unchanged chat implementation passed a genuine staging campaign, workflow 41725181387, at source `4c6cc9d67d2ae577e3a8ae7856bd6ae22a8489c1`: all nine checks, all five phases, three provider turns plus one synthetic reset, all four usage IDs, and closed cleanup. This evidence remains bound to that original source. The new integration head requires its own current gates and coordinator qualification decision; this PR does not enroll anything in the daily plan. - The earlier staging workflow 41701828968 remains failed. Its nine behavior checks passed, but private collection rejected the valid reset's capture of the old session and cleanup failed. The private adapter fix and evidence-first recovery were handled separately. The original failed grade and archive are preserved. Reset prior-session capture is distinct from the third native turn's explicit-null fresh admission. - Three missing/undefined/empty fresh-admission controls reproduced false passes on `247827a066af01fa583ff030df79b61cb2c87730`, then passed after the strict null fix. Four earlier controls reproduced compact-detail, mixed-activity, missing fresh-agent receipt and unscoped-activity problems. Their original failures remain retained. Positive and wrong outcomes still enforce bound reset summaries, committed native state, configured identity and independent rendered output. Board provisioning uses the acting-agent filter; it does not grandfather earlier work by the test agent. - The first broad support attempt passed 861 tests and failed one report-generator check. A separate reproduction showed `listen EPERM` for the tsx local IPC socket before report output; the unchanged support suite passed with normal local IPC permission. An early flow fixture also returned an object where the events API returns an array; the real event reader rejected it, and only that fixture was corrected. Both original failures remain recorded. - Original commit `d6226b30acaf5a2dad28030f5b295ac1dd119565` failed full CI [41653171240](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41653171240): a CLI child-server runtime-file wait and two 15-second attention-retention timeouts, followed by database setup/cleanup errors. Their exact causes remain unresolved; the failed jobs and logs were retained and not retried. A later pass does not explain those timeouts. - Strict-admission source `055a7fa99e7cb8aad12b85fccf23880f0dc98a3f` failed full CI [41669527762](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41669527762): private-invitation and pending-shell access fixtures. The retained assertions match the account-identity fixture repair in #18799, now included through master, together with #18798 and #18650. No old-head job was retried. Subsequent source `4c6cc9d67d2ae577e3a8ae7856bd6ae22a8489c1` passed full CI 41680411215 and current-source review at 5/5. - Current full CI [41743580793, attempt 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41743580793/attempts/2) completed successfully on unchanged `ddc37bb05b87cbc1fa449e4b2fc5a4677f0fe3b6` at 2026-11-04 00:34:52 UTC: 48 successful jobs and one intentional selector skip. Attempt 1 remains failed: three run-bound runners were independently confirmed to have lost Spot capacity, and the two aggregate failures reflected those interrupted lanes. The build and boot health smoke had passed before interruption. Exactly one failed-job recheck was used; no source change or further retry was made. Fresh exact-head Greptile review is 5/5 with no new actionable issues and both review threads resolved. The separate Ponytail assessment says Ship with no must-fix or should-fix item; its optional direct board-row grader control remains documented. Whole-workspace recursive typecheck, full tests and full build were covered by hosted verification and were not repeated locally; the bounded local checks above passed. These gates do not claim that a later master merge tree has been live-qualified. ## Risks The attached target must supply a fresh disposable native agent and durable pre-send ownership for its chat. Its private adapter must collect all four run IDs, distinguish the synthetic reset from the three provider turns, and stop and clean up owned resources after evidence is saved. This case verifies browser reload, reopen and explicit session reset. It does not verify controller restart. Unknown setup or provider cost remains unknown. No shared QA source agent, model setting, production behavior or budget policy is changed by this public PR. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex with reasoning, code execution and repository tools. The runtime does not expose a more specific model identifier or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>