mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-06 23:20:53 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server has about 1,100 test and helper files in `server/src/__tests__` > - `server/tsconfig.json` excludes that directory, Vitest does not check types, and no script runs the tsconfig in that directory > - So a test can call a function with the wrong arguments and still pass, and no tool reports it > - This gap hid 2,168 real type errors, and some of them hid tests that did not test what they claim > - This pull request fixes all of these errors and adds the directory to the server layers from paperclipai/paperclip#18737 > - The benefit is that a type error in a server test now fails the typecheck, with no baseline and no backlog ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs paperclipai/paperclip#18737, which is merged and added the server layers. Refs paperclipai/paperclip#18738, which is merged and checks the test projects outside `pnpm -r`, so it is not a duplicate. Refs paperclipai/paperclip#18137, which records that this directory has no check. **What happened?** No tool checked the types of 1,074 of the 1,101 files in `server/src/__tests__`. I searched `package.json`, the workflows, and all tsconfig files. 27 files are in the program of another tsconfig, and these 27 have 0 errors. 11 of the 27 are in `helpers/maintenance/tsconfig.json`. No script ran that project when I measured this. paperclipai/paperclip#18738 now runs it. **Expected behavior** The server typecheck checks these files, and a type error fails the check. **Steps to reproduce** 1. On the base commit, run `tsc -p server/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json --noEmit`. It reports 6,536 errors and needs 12.3 GiB. 2. Add a type error to any file in `server/src/__tests__`. 3. Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`. It passes. **Paperclip version or commit** I measured the error breakdown below on commit `8dfd632452`, with TypeScript 7.0.2. The branch now includes master up to paperclipai/paperclip#18865. **Deployment mode** Not applicable. This issue applies to development and CI. No production source file in the server changes. ### Error breakdown Each row adds one change to the row above. | Step | Total errors | Change | Cause | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Config as committed | 6,536 | | | | Add `src/types/*.d.ts` | 4,447 | -2,089 | Config. The Express request types were missing. | | Set `rootDir` to the repository root | 2,436 | -2,011 | Config. | | Set `allowImportingTsExtensions` | 2,181 | -255 | Config. Vitest accepts `.ts` imports. | | Add `ES2024.Promise` to `lib` | 2,138 | -43 | Config. Node 24 has `Promise.withResolvers`. | | Set `allowJs` for `.mjs` imports | 2,148 | +10 | Config. It removes 8 `TS7016` errors and shows new real errors. | | Set `declaration` to false | 2,142 | -6 | Config. Tests emit nothing. | | Count only files in `server/src` | 2,058 | -84 | Other packages: 53 Daytona, 29 Runner test, 2 UI. | So 4,478 of the 6,536 errors (69%) came from config or scope, and 2,058 are real type errors in 314 files. The 29 Runner test errors are also real, which gives 2,087 errors. Tests that master added after this measurement had 81 more errors, so this pull request fixes 2,168 errors. This table classifies the first 2,058 errors. | Kind of real error | Errors | | --- | --- | | Wrong argument or assignment type | 1,023 | | Stale or partial fixture objects | 525 | | Property that the type does not have | 317 | | Missing narrowing of null or unknown | 101 | | Implicit any | 60 | | Missing name or module | 16 | | Other | 16 | ### What the type errors hid Most errors were stale fixtures and loose mocks. These errors hid real test problems, and this pull request fixes them: - **A test that never ran.** `instrumentation.test.ts` required `sdk-trace-base`, which is not installed. So 3 span tests were skipped. They now run and pass. - **Assertions that could not fail.** - `issue-thread-interactions-service` used a company ID as an issue ID. - `status-card-evaluation-work` compared `[]` with `[]` in a rollback check. - `slack-conversation-lifecycle` read `item.issueId`, which does not exist. - `email-channels` used a permission key that does not exist. - `heartbeat-project-env` imported `LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET`, which is not exported. The value was undefined. - **Postgres processes that did not stop.** 11 test files called `stop` on the test database helper. That method does not exist, and the helper method is `cleanup`. - **Arguments that the service ignored.** - `methodKey` is now `connectionMethodKey` in the Daytona, Unikraft, 1Password, and Railway tests. - 108 calls passed `"owner-user"` to a parameter that expects an options object. - 9 chat wizard fixtures passed `managementContext` as `source`, so they ran `existing_app` and not `manifest`. - 2 tests passed a `{ userId }` actor that the function ignores. - Inserts into `environments` passed a `companyId` column that the table does not have. - **Problems in tests that master added during this work.** - `sandbox-creation-operations` read `database.connectionString` when an external test database was set. In that mode `database` is undefined, so the fixture would stop with a TypeError. It now uses the external URL. - `idle-completed-history` set a Dot operation to `dispatched`. That is a Muse status, and the Dot type does not have it. The fixture now uses `admitted`, which is a real in-flight Dot status. ### Possible product problems, not changed These may be real problems in production code or types. I did not change them, because this pull request does not change production behavior: - `decisions-service` `service.create` does not validate the lenient `cancel_issue_tree` input. - `createConnection` ignores `input.connectionPurpose`. - The `createConnection` route schema default stores `{}` for `transportConfig`. - `prepareManagedAiRuntime` accepted the invalid value `mode: "connection"`. - `createBinding` accepts invalid `projectionClass` strings outside class 3. - `ensureManagedProjectWorkspace` forwards an untyped `repoRef` by spread. - `routineVariableSchema.label` is optional, but `RoutineVariable.label` is required. - `ToolRunContext.projectId` may be too strict. - `withdrawInteraction` reads `issue.status`, which its type omits. - `issueService.list` and `reconcileNativeFinalizations` omit fields that they return at runtime. - `createGitHubExternalObjectProvider` handles `tokenProvider: null`, but its type forbids this value. ## What Changed - Fixed the 2,168 type errors. The diff changes 322 test and helper files. - Corrected `server/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json`. Editors and the typecheck now read the same options and report the same errors. - Added three `test-tree` layers to `server/scripts/typecheck-layers.mjs`. They read the server layers as declarations, and any error fails them. A hash of the path selects the shard, so a new file does not move other files. - Added `server/scripts/typecheck-stubs/daytona-sdk.d.ts`. Server tests reach Daytona plugin source, and the root install does not have `@daytonaio/sdk`. - Changed two imports in `ui/src/lib/issue-execution-policy.ts` to use `.js` extensions, because server tests import this file. - Made `declarationsConfig` and `--declarations-only` skip the `test-tree` layers, because these layers emit nothing. Other projects read only the source layers. Added a test for this. - Updated `doc/DEVELOPING.md`. ## Verification Run these commands: ```sh pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck pnpm exec vitest run server/scripts/typecheck-layers.test.mjs ``` Results on macOS (arm64), Node 24, 16 cores. Each check ran after the merge of paperclipai/paperclip#18738 unless the row says otherwise: | Check | Commit | Result | | --- | --- | --- | | Server typecheck, `PAPERCLIP_TYPECHECK_LOW_MEMORY=1`, all 7 layers | `6e45a08573` | Exit 0, 0 errors, 62 seconds, peak 3.52 GiB | | `node scripts/typecheck-test-projects.mjs --low-memory` | `a3306bd13e` | Exit 0, 0 errors, 42 seconds, peak 3.25 GiB | | The same script with `--reuse-declarations` | `1b878aabc0` | Exit 0, 0 errors | | `typecheck-layers.test.mjs` and `live-recovery-work.test.ts` | `01db5634e4` | 90 passed. These include real compiler runs for a pass, a type error, and an invalid tsconfig. | | `tsconfig.declarations.json` after a full server typecheck | `0fb1e4fb0a` | It references only `below`, `cycle`, and `above`. No generated config names a `tsconfig.layers.json` file. | | Owned runtime test in `idle-completed-history` | `e8f2f448ac` | Passed, with the fix that master later replaced | | `idle-incoming-wake`, `plugin-idle-manager`, and the changed `chat-channels` test | `6e45a08573` | 30 passed | | Runner `native-execution.test.ts` | `eab4dcc1f4` | 114 passed | | The 19 server test files that changed since `eab4dcc1f4`, and `typecheck-layers.test.mjs` | `259737b700` | 4,275 of 4,277 passed. The 2 failures are in `chat-channels` and are in the list of 7 below. | The peak is the largest single process, from `/usr/bin/time -l`. Peaks for the server typecheck were between 3.42 GiB and 3.56 GiB across 8 runs. Peaks for the test projects were 3.25 GiB and 3.37 GiB across 2 runs. I did not measure a cgroup. **Runtime check of the fixes.** Types do not prove that a test still works. So I ran all 309 changed server test files, 11,929 tests, before the rebase onto paperclipai/paperclip#18737: | Result | Tests | Detail | | --- | --- | --- | | Passed | 11,913 | Includes the 2 tests and the 54 `dot-runner` tests that passed in a later run, as described below. | | Failed | 7 | The same 7 tests also fail on the commit before the fixes. | | Skipped | 9 | These tests have their own skip conditions: `sentry` 5, and 1 each in `bundled-plugin-registration`, `customer-success-cloud`, `onepassword-connection`, and `workspace-runtime-https-live-exercise`. | The 7 tests that fail with and without this change, on my machine: - 3 tests in `chat-channels` and `email-channels` stop with `ENOENT` on a `SKILL.md` file. The path is in the parent checkout, above the git worktree that I used, so I expect that the worktree is the cause. I did not prove this. - `workspace-instance-cleanup` compares `/private/var/...` with `/var/...`. This is a macOS symlink difference. - 2 tests in `git-reproducible-managed-checkouts` get `unknown_base_git_files` and expect `unpushed_managed_checkout`. I did not find the cause. - 1 more test in `chat-channels`, `materializes direct external-chat finals once`, gets `undefined`. I did not find the cause. CI is the check for these 7 tests. `ci / verify` passed on `eab4dcc1f4`. Failures during this work: - My fix to `agent-runtime-connector-access` changed an invalid permission key in the setup, but not in the assertion. The runtime check found this. I corrected the assertion, and the file passes. - `heartbeat-plugin-environment` failed one wait in the full run. It passed three times alone, so I think that load caused the failure. It can fail again under load. - `dot-runner` skipped all 54 tests in the full run because `cargo` was not on my `PATH`. It then passed 54 of 54 with the toolchain on the `PATH`. - My first `lib` value removed the default DOM types, and the error count went up by 375. I added the DOM libraries. - My Daytona stub with bare `any` left 48 errors, because generic helpers then inferred `unknown`. I added shapes that return promises. - One fix to `agent-secrets-routes` used `class_3_static_lease`, and the test failed. That class allows only specific paths. I reverted to `unclassified`. - `ci / General tests (server (8/12))` failed on `259737b700` because of the flaky port in `idle-completed-history`. paperclipai/paperclip#18853 fixed this test on master, so this pull request keeps that fix. **Audit of the diff.** I counted these patterns in added and removed lines, to find fixes that only hide an error: | Pattern | Added | Removed | | --- | --- | --- | | `@ts-ignore` | 0 | 0 | | `@ts-expect-error` | 0 | 1 | | `.skip` | 0 | 0 | | `as any` | 9 | 9 | | `: any` | 11 | 2 | | `as never` | 8 | 2 | | `as unknown as` | 35 | 4 | | `Promise<unknown>` | 16 | 5 | | `expect(` | 128 | 113 | No hunk removes more `expect(` calls than it adds. Three removals of test content were intentional, and I checked each one: - `muse-control` removed `signalToken`. Line 1012 already asserts that it is absent. - `merged-pr-confirmation-sweep` removed legacy aliases. Other tests cover them. - `heartbeat-workspace-branch-containment` removed a `finalize` branch that no test row can reach. Some partial fixtures stay unchecked through `as unknown as` and `Promise<unknown>`, mostly in `issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes` and `issue-comment-reopen-routes`. **Accuracy of the check.** One program over the tree and the three shards reported the same errors at the same positions. Memory, as the peak of the largest process on one thread, was 3.93 GiB for one program and 2.43 GiB for the largest shard. I measured these two values before the fixes. Not run or not proven: - I did not run the full `pnpm test:run`, or a root `pnpm build`. I expect CI to run the full suites. - I did not run the 4 GiB container check, or the full `scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`. The peaks above come from macOS, so they are not a Linux cgroup measurement. - I did not run the UI typecheck after the merges. - `workspace-runtime-https-live-exercise` is skipped, so its `cleanup` fix did not run. ## Risks - **A large diff in test files.** 328 files change. A pull request that edits the same tests can get merge conflicts. New tests on master can also add type errors before this merges. Any such error fails this check and needs a fix here. - **A higher cost for changes to source types.** A change to a type can add errors in test files that the author did not touch. The author must then fix them. This is the purpose of the check, but it is new work. - **Changed test behavior.** Some tests now run paths that they did not run before, such as the 9 chat wizard fixtures and the 3 span tests. They pass here, but they can be more sensitive to timing or to the environment. - **The Daytona stub can go stale.** The stub is written by hand. If the plugin uses a new SDK member, the typecheck reports an error until someone updates the stub. - **The release path.** `release-verify.yml` and `scripts/release.sh` run `pnpm -r typecheck`, so they now run this check. - **The tsconfig change.** The test transform reads `server/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json`. The options that I changed are for type checks, and the runs above passed. - **A gap that remains.** Tsconfigs in `packages/paperclip-runner` and in most sandbox provider plugins exclude `*.test.ts`. This check does not read most of those test files, so they can still drift. That work is separate from this pull request. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and subagents. The runtime does not show the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass (7 tests fail locally, with and without this change. See Verification.) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1114 lines
51 KiB
TypeScript
1114 lines
51 KiB
TypeScript
import { createLocalAgentJwt } from "../agent-auth-jwt.js";
|
|
import { applyRunnerGoalPrpEvent } from "../services/runner-goals.js";
|
|
import { mkdtemp, rm } from "node:fs/promises";
|
|
import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
|
|
import { join } from "node:path";
|
|
import { ensureHumanRoleDefaultGrants } from "../services/principal-access-compatibility.js";
|
|
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { issueRoutes } from "../routes/issues.js";
|
|
import { errorHandler } from "../middleware/index.js";
|
|
import { actorMiddleware } from "../middleware/auth.js";
|
|
import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
|
|
import { and, eq } from "drizzle-orm";
|
|
import { afterAll, beforeAll, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
activityLog,
|
|
authUsers,
|
|
agents,
|
|
agentTaskSessions,
|
|
agentWakeupRequests,
|
|
companyMemberships,
|
|
companies,
|
|
createDb,
|
|
heartbeatRuns,
|
|
issueComments,
|
|
issueTreeHolds,
|
|
issueThreadInteractions,
|
|
issueRecoveryActions,
|
|
issues,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/db";
|
|
import {
|
|
recoveryPostgresSupport as support,
|
|
startRecoveryPostgres,
|
|
} from "./helpers/recovery-postgres.js";
|
|
import { issueService } from "../services/issues.js";
|
|
import { documentService } from "../services/documents.js";
|
|
import { getTaskPlanContext } from "../services/task-plan-context.js";
|
|
import { terminalizeLegacyExecution, LEGACY_RECOVERY_CAUSE } from "../services/legacy-execution-recovery.js";
|
|
import { settleUnrecoverableExecutions } from "../services/execution-recovery-resolution.js";
|
|
import { renderPaperclipWakePrompt } from "@paperclipai/adapter-utils/server-utils";
|
|
import { instanceSettingsService } from "../services/instance-settings.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
AGENT_CHAT_DIRECTIVE,
|
|
conversationNativeDecision,
|
|
deliverConversationComments,
|
|
conversationReplay,
|
|
isWaitingConversation,
|
|
isConversationExecutionWake,
|
|
prepareConversationTurn,
|
|
settleConversationTurn,
|
|
undeliveredConversationComments,
|
|
} from "../services/agent-conversations.js";
|
|
import { classifyIssueGraphLiveness } from "../services/recovery/issue-graph-liveness.js";
|
|
import { NATIVE_STATUS_ARBITER_POLICY_VERSION } from "../services/native-runtime/status-arbiter.js";
|
|
import { runningProcesses } from "../adapters/index.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
buildPaperclipTaskMarkdown,
|
|
buildPaperclipWakePayload,
|
|
heartbeatService,
|
|
} from "../services/heartbeat.js";
|
|
|
|
(support.supported ? describe : describe.skip)(
|
|
"persistent agent conversations",
|
|
() => {
|
|
let database: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof startRecoveryPostgres>>;
|
|
let db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>;
|
|
let companyId: string;
|
|
let agentId: string;
|
|
beforeAll(async () => {
|
|
database = await startRecoveryPostgres(
|
|
"paperclip-agent-conversations-",
|
|
);
|
|
db = createDb(database.connectionString);
|
|
companyId = randomUUID();
|
|
agentId = randomUUID();
|
|
await db
|
|
.insert(authUsers)
|
|
.values({
|
|
id: "local-board",
|
|
name: "Local Board",
|
|
email: "local@paperclip.test",
|
|
createdAt: new Date(),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
})
|
|
.onConflictDoNothing();
|
|
await db
|
|
.insert(companies)
|
|
.values({
|
|
id: companyId,
|
|
name: "Chats",
|
|
issuePrefix: "CHAT",
|
|
requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents: false,
|
|
});
|
|
await db
|
|
.insert(agents)
|
|
.values({
|
|
id: agentId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
name: "Planner",
|
|
role: "engineer",
|
|
status: "idle",
|
|
adapterType: "process",
|
|
});
|
|
await instanceSettingsService(db).updateExperimental({
|
|
enableAgentChat: true,
|
|
});
|
|
}, 90000);
|
|
afterAll(async () => {
|
|
await db?.$client.end({ timeout: 0 });
|
|
await database?.cleanup();
|
|
});
|
|
const create = (user = randomUUID()) =>
|
|
issueService(db).create(companyId, {
|
|
title: "Conversation",
|
|
conversationAgentId: agentId,
|
|
conversationUserId: user,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
conversationState: "waiting",
|
|
});
|
|
async function runFor(issueId: string, commentId: string, overrides = {}) {
|
|
return (
|
|
await db
|
|
.insert(heartbeatRuns)
|
|
.values({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
agentId,
|
|
status: "running",
|
|
contextSnapshot: {
|
|
issueId,
|
|
taskKey: issueId,
|
|
wakeCommentId: commentId,
|
|
commentId,
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
.returning()
|
|
)[0]!;
|
|
}
|
|
it("atomically resolves one task per person and agent and excludes it from ordinary lists", async () => {
|
|
const user = randomUUID();
|
|
expect(
|
|
await issueService(db).getConversation(companyId, agentId, user),
|
|
).toBeNull();
|
|
const results = await Promise.all(
|
|
Array.from({ length: 6 }, () => create(user)),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(new Set(results.map((issue) => issue.id)).size).toBe(1);
|
|
expect((await create()).id).not.toBe(results[0].id);
|
|
expect(
|
|
(await issueService(db).list(companyId)).some(
|
|
(issue) => issue.id === results[0].id,
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(
|
|
(
|
|
await issueService(db).list(companyId, { q: results[0].identifier! })
|
|
).some((issue) => issue.id === results[0].id),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
(await issueService(db).getById(results[0].id))?.conversationUserId,
|
|
).toBe(user);
|
|
await expect(
|
|
issueService(db).update(results[0].id, { status: "done" }),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/conversation/i);
|
|
await expect(
|
|
issueService(db).update(results[0].id, { assigneeAgentId: null }),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/conversation/i);
|
|
});
|
|
it("resolves through authenticated company routes, keeps opens read-only, and derives ownership", async () => {
|
|
const appFor = (userId?: string, allowed = true) => {
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
if (!userId)
|
|
app.use(actorMiddleware(db, { deploymentMode: "local_trusted" }));
|
|
else
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
req.actor = {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyIds: allowed ? [companyId] : [],
|
|
};
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes(db, { wakeup: async () => null } as never));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
};
|
|
const path = `/api/companies/${companyId}/chats/${agentId}`;
|
|
const owner = randomUUID();
|
|
const colleague = randomUUID();
|
|
const app = appFor(owner);
|
|
for (const userId of [owner, colleague]) {
|
|
await db
|
|
.insert(companyMemberships)
|
|
.values({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
principalType: "user",
|
|
principalId: userId,
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
membershipRole: "operator",
|
|
});
|
|
await ensureHumanRoleDefaultGrants(db, {
|
|
companyId,
|
|
principalId: userId,
|
|
membershipRole: "operator",
|
|
grantedByUserId: null,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
expect((await request(app).get(path)).body).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(
|
|
await issueService(db).getConversation(companyId, agentId, owner),
|
|
).toBeNull();
|
|
const resolved = await Promise.all([
|
|
request(app).post(path).send({ conversationUserId: "spoof" }),
|
|
request(app).post(path),
|
|
]);
|
|
expect(resolved.every((response) => response.status === 200)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(resolved[0].body.id).toBe(resolved[1].body.id);
|
|
expect(resolved[0].body.conversationUserId).toBe(owner);
|
|
const listPath = `/api/companies/${companyId}/chats`;
|
|
const owned = await request(app).get(listPath);
|
|
expect(owned.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(owned.body.map((chat: { id: string }) => chat.id)).toEqual([resolved[0].body.id]);
|
|
expect((await request(appFor(colleague)).get(listPath)).body).toEqual([]);
|
|
expect((await request(appFor(randomUUID(), false)).get(listPath)).status).toBe(403);
|
|
await instanceSettingsService(db).updateExperimental({ enableAgentChat: false });
|
|
expect((await request(app).get(listPath)).status).toBe(404);
|
|
await instanceSettingsService(db).updateExperimental({ enableAgentChat: true });
|
|
expect(
|
|
(
|
|
await request(appFor(colleague)).get(
|
|
`/api/issues/${resolved[0].body.id}`,
|
|
)
|
|
).status,
|
|
).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(
|
|
(await request(appFor(randomUUID(), false)).get(path)).status,
|
|
).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(
|
|
(
|
|
await request(app)
|
|
.post(`/api/issues/${resolved[0].body.id}/comments`)
|
|
.send({ body: "Hello" })
|
|
).status,
|
|
).toBe(422);
|
|
const chatId = resolved[0].body.id;
|
|
const queuedInterrupt = { queueId: randomUUID(), revision: "queue-revision", targetRunId: randomUUID() };
|
|
expect((await request(appFor(colleague)).post(`/api/issues/${chatId}/queued-comments/interrupt`)
|
|
.send(queuedInterrupt)).status).toBe(403);
|
|
for (const body of ["Hello", "/new"]) {
|
|
expect((await request(appFor(colleague)).post(`/api/issues/${chatId}/comments`)
|
|
.send({ body, clientRequestId: randomUUID() })).status).toBe(403);
|
|
}
|
|
expect((await request(appFor(colleague))
|
|
.post(`/api/companies/${companyId}/issues/${chatId}/attachments`)
|
|
.attach("file", Buffer.from("foreign upload"), "note.txt")).status).toBe(403);
|
|
|
|
const [planReview] = await db.insert(issueThreadInteractions).values({
|
|
companyId, issueId: chatId, kind: "request_confirmation", status: "pending",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept", payload: { version: 1, prompt: "Hand off this plan?" },
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
expect((await request(appFor(colleague))
|
|
.post(`/api/issues/${chatId}/interactions/${planReview.id}/accept`).send({})).status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect((await db.select().from(issueThreadInteractions).where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, planReview.id)))[0].status).toBe("pending");
|
|
const [pause] = await db.insert(issueTreeHolds).values({
|
|
companyId, rootIssueId: chatId, mode: "pause", status: "active",
|
|
createdByActorType: "user", createdByUserId: owner,
|
|
releasePolicy: { strategy: "manual", note: "leaf_pause" },
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
const blockedSend = await request(app).post(`/api/issues/${chatId}/comments`)
|
|
.send({ body: "Continue working", clientRequestId: randomUUID() });
|
|
expect(blockedSend.status).toBe(409);
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(issueComments).where(eq(issueComments.issueId, chatId))).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
const resetRequest = { body: "/new", clientRequestId: randomUUID() };
|
|
const reset = await request(app).post(`/api/issues/${chatId}/comments`).send(resetRequest);
|
|
expect(reset.status).toBe(201);
|
|
const retriedResets = await Promise.all(Array.from({ length: 3 }, () =>
|
|
request(app).post(`/api/issues/${chatId}/comments`).send(resetRequest)));
|
|
expect(retriedResets.every((response) => response.status === 201 && response.body.id === reset.body.id)).toBe(true);
|
|
const addedEvents = await db.select().from(activityLog).where(and(
|
|
eq(activityLog.entityId, chatId), eq(activityLog.action, "issue.comment_added"),
|
|
));
|
|
expect(addedEvents).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
|
|
expect((await db.select().from(issueTreeHolds).where(eq(issueTreeHolds.id, pause.id)))[0].status).toBe("released");
|
|
const local = await request(appFor()).post(path);
|
|
expect(local.body.conversationUserId).toBe("local-board");
|
|
await instanceSettingsService(db).updateExperimental({
|
|
enableAgentChat: false,
|
|
});
|
|
expect((await request(app).get(path)).status).toBe(404);
|
|
expect((await request(app).post(`/api/issues/${chatId}/queued-comments/interrupt`)
|
|
.send(queuedInterrupt)).status).toBe(404);
|
|
expect(
|
|
(await request(app).get(`/api/issues/${resolved[0].body.id}`)).status,
|
|
).toBe(200);
|
|
await instanceSettingsService(db).updateExperimental({
|
|
enableAgentChat: true,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
it("deduplicates concurrent message retries and preserves recoverable delivery", async () => {
|
|
const issue = await create();
|
|
const clientRequestId = randomUUID();
|
|
const messages = await Promise.all(
|
|
Array.from({ length: 4 }, () =>
|
|
issueService(db).addComment(
|
|
issue.id,
|
|
"Help scope a project",
|
|
{ userId: "local-board" },
|
|
{ clientRequestId },
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(new Set(messages.map((message) => message.id)).size).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(
|
|
await undeliveredConversationComments(db, companyId, issue.id),
|
|
).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
await expect(
|
|
issueService(db).addComment(
|
|
issue.id,
|
|
"Different",
|
|
{ userId: "local-board" },
|
|
{ clientRequestId },
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/different content/);
|
|
});
|
|
it("resets only this task, keeps history, and fences stale replies and retries", async () => {
|
|
const issue = await create();
|
|
const other = await create();
|
|
const before = await issueService(db).addComment(
|
|
issue.id,
|
|
"Old session secret context",
|
|
{ userId: "local-board" },
|
|
);
|
|
const oldRun = await runFor(issue.id, before.id);
|
|
await prepareConversationTurn(db, oldRun);
|
|
for (const target of [issue, other])
|
|
await db
|
|
.insert(agentTaskSessions)
|
|
.values({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
agentId,
|
|
adapterType: "process",
|
|
taskKey: target.id,
|
|
sessionDisplayId: "old-session",
|
|
});
|
|
const command = await issueService(db).addComment(issue.id, "/new", {
|
|
userId: "local-board",
|
|
});
|
|
const resetRun = await runFor(issue.id, command.id);
|
|
expect((await prepareConversationTurn(db, resetRun)).reset).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
(
|
|
await prepareConversationTurn(
|
|
db,
|
|
(
|
|
await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(heartbeatRuns)
|
|
.where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, resetRun.id))
|
|
)[0]!,
|
|
)
|
|
).reset,
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
const [current] = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, issue.id));
|
|
expect(current.conversationSessionGeneration).toBe(1);
|
|
expect(current.conversationBoundaryCommentId).toBe(command.id);
|
|
expect(
|
|
await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(agentTaskSessions)
|
|
.where(eq(agentTaskSessions.taskKey, issue.id)),
|
|
).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
expect(
|
|
await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(agentTaskSessions)
|
|
.where(eq(agentTaskSessions.taskKey, other.id)),
|
|
).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(
|
|
await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueComments)
|
|
.where(eq(issueComments.issueId, issue.id)),
|
|
).toHaveLength(2);
|
|
await expect(
|
|
issueService(db).addComment(issue.id, "Late old reply", {
|
|
agentId,
|
|
runId: oldRun.id,
|
|
}),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/earlier session/);
|
|
await expect(
|
|
prepareConversationTurn(
|
|
db,
|
|
(
|
|
await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(heartbeatRuns)
|
|
.where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, oldRun.id))
|
|
)[0]!,
|
|
),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/older turn/);
|
|
expect(await applyRunnerGoalPrpEvent(db, { companyId, agentId, issueId: issue.id, adapterType: "process" }, {
|
|
eventType: "session.capabilities.updated", sourceRunId: oldRun.id, sourceSeq: 500, payload: {},
|
|
})).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(await db.select().from(agentTaskSessions).where(eq(agentTaskSessions.taskKey, issue.id))).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
const next = await issueService(db).addComment(
|
|
issue.id,
|
|
"Fresh context",
|
|
{ userId: "local-board" },
|
|
);
|
|
expect(
|
|
await conversationReplay(db, companyId, issue.id, next.id),
|
|
).not.toContain("Old session");
|
|
const payload = await buildPaperclipWakePayload({
|
|
db, companyId,
|
|
contextSnapshot: { issueId: issue.id, conversationMode: true, wakeCommentId: next.id },
|
|
continuationSummary: { key: "summary", title: null, body: "Old session summary", updatedAt: new Date() },
|
|
issueSummary: { ...issue, description: "Old session description" },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(payload)).not.toContain("Old session");
|
|
expect(payload?.planReviewContext).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(payload?.documentReviewContext).toBeNull();
|
|
const later = await issueService(db).addComment(
|
|
issue.id,
|
|
"Following turn",
|
|
{ userId: "local-board" },
|
|
);
|
|
expect(
|
|
await conversationReplay(db, companyId, issue.id, later.id),
|
|
).toContain("Fresh context");
|
|
expect(
|
|
await conversationReplay(db, companyId, issue.id, next.id),
|
|
).not.toContain("Following turn");
|
|
});
|
|
it("projects the resolved chat plan review into fresh and resumed prompts without replaying old reviews", async () => {
|
|
const issue = await create();
|
|
const { document } = await documentService(db).upsertIssueDocument({
|
|
issueId: issue.id, key: "plan", title: "Plan", format: "markdown", body: "Draft plan",
|
|
});
|
|
const [interaction] = await db.insert(issueThreadInteractions).values({
|
|
companyId, issueId: issue.id, kind: "request_confirmation", status: "rejected",
|
|
payload: { version: 1, prompt: "Approve the plan?", target: { type: "issue_document", key: "plan", documentId: document.id,
|
|
revisionId: document.latestRevisionId!, revisionNumber: document.latestRevisionNumber } },
|
|
result: { version: 1, outcome: "rejected", reason: "Include CHAT_REVIEW_MARKER in the revised plan." },
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
const input = { db, companyId, issueSummary: { ...issue, workMode: "planning" },
|
|
contextSnapshot: { issueId: issue.id, conversationMode: true, interactionId: interaction!.id,
|
|
interactionKind: "request_confirmation", interactionStatus: "rejected" } };
|
|
const payload = await buildPaperclipWakePayload(input);
|
|
expect(payload?.planReviewContext?.interaction).toMatchObject({
|
|
status: "rejected", acceptedTargetRevision: null,
|
|
result: { outcome: "rejected", reason: "Include CHAT_REVIEW_MARKER in the revised plan." },
|
|
});
|
|
for (const resumedSession of [false, true]) {
|
|
const prompt = renderPaperclipWakePrompt(payload, { resumedSession });
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("request_confirmation rejected");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Include CHAT_REVIEW_MARKER in the revised plan.");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("not approval to implement or hand off execution tasks");
|
|
expect(prompt).not.toContain("- accepted target:");
|
|
}
|
|
const later = await buildPaperclipWakePayload({ ...input,
|
|
contextSnapshot: { issueId: issue.id, conversationMode: true } });
|
|
expect(later?.planReviewContext).toBeNull();
|
|
// An unrelated confirmation must not cause old plan context to be replayed.
|
|
await db.update(issueThreadInteractions).set({ payload: { version: 1, prompt: "Proceed?" } })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interaction!.id));
|
|
expect((await buildPaperclipWakePayload(input))?.planReviewContext).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
it("includes an initial handoff plan in the first execution prompt and pins approved revisions", async () => {
|
|
const task = await issueService(db).create(companyId, {
|
|
title: "Execute handed-off work",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
initialPlan: "Write an output document containing HANDOFF_ACCEPTANCE_PHRASE.",
|
|
});
|
|
const initial = await getTaskPlanContext({ db, companyId, issueId: task.id });
|
|
expect(task.description).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(initial?.body).toContain("HANDOFF_ACCEPTANCE_PHRASE");
|
|
for (const includeDescription of [true, false]) {
|
|
const prompt = buildPaperclipTaskMarkdown({
|
|
issue: task,
|
|
taskPlan: initial,
|
|
includeDescription,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("HANDOFF_ACCEPTANCE_PHRASE");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain(initial!.revisionId);
|
|
}
|
|
const { document: revision } = await documentService(db).upsertIssueDocument({
|
|
issueId: task.id,
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "A later unapproved draft.",
|
|
baseRevisionId: initial!.revisionId,
|
|
});
|
|
expect((await getTaskPlanContext({ db, companyId, issueId: task.id }))?.revisionId)
|
|
.toBe(revision.latestRevisionId);
|
|
const approved = await getTaskPlanContext({
|
|
db, companyId, issueId: task.id, approvedRevisionId: initial!.revisionId,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(approved?.body).toContain("HANDOFF_ACCEPTANCE_PHRASE");
|
|
expect(approved?.body).not.toContain("unapproved");
|
|
expect(await getTaskPlanContext({ db, companyId: randomUUID(), issueId: task.id })).toBeNull();
|
|
expect(await getTaskPlanContext({
|
|
db, companyId, issueId: task.id, approvedRevisionId: randomUUID(),
|
|
})).toBeNull();
|
|
const conversation = await create();
|
|
await documentService(db).upsertIssueDocument({
|
|
issueId: conversation.id, key: "plan", format: "markdown", body: "Pre-reset chat draft",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(await getTaskPlanContext({ db, companyId, issueId: conversation.id })).toBeNull();
|
|
await documentService(db).upsertIssueDocument({
|
|
issueId: task.id,
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "QUARANTINED_PLAN_BODY",
|
|
baseRevisionId: revision.latestRevisionId,
|
|
sourceTrust: {
|
|
preset: "low_trust_review",
|
|
disposition: "quarantined",
|
|
sourceIssueId: task.id,
|
|
sourceRunId: randomUUID(),
|
|
sourceAgentId: agentId,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect((await getTaskPlanContext({ db, companyId, issueId: task.id }))?.body)
|
|
.not.toContain("QUARANTINED_PLAN_BODY");
|
|
expect((await getTaskPlanContext({
|
|
db, companyId, issueId: task.id, exposeLowTrustRaw: true,
|
|
}))?.body).toBe("QUARANTINED_PLAN_BODY");
|
|
});
|
|
it("keeps concurrent delivery and multiple resets in separate ordered queue entries", async () => {
|
|
const issue = await create();
|
|
const first = await issueService(db).addComment(issue.id, "First", {
|
|
userId: "local-board",
|
|
});
|
|
const active = await runFor(issue.id, first.id);
|
|
await prepareConversationTurn(db, active);
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(issues)
|
|
.set({ executionRunId: active.id, executionLockedAt: new Date() })
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, issue.id));
|
|
runningProcesses.set(active.id, {
|
|
child: {} as never,
|
|
graceSec: 0,
|
|
processGroupId: null,
|
|
});
|
|
try {
|
|
const commands = [];
|
|
for (const body of ["Before reset", "/new", "/new", "After reset"])
|
|
commands.push(
|
|
await issueService(db).addComment(
|
|
issue.id,
|
|
body,
|
|
{ userId: "local-board" },
|
|
{ clientRequestId: randomUUID() },
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
const heartbeat = heartbeatService(db);
|
|
await Promise.all(
|
|
Array.from({ length: 3 }, () =>
|
|
deliverConversationComments(db, issue, heartbeat.wakeup),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
const wakes = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(agentWakeupRequests)
|
|
.where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.agentId, agentId));
|
|
const queued = wakes.filter(
|
|
(wake) =>
|
|
(wake.payload as Record<string, unknown>)?.issueId === issue.id,
|
|
);
|
|
expect(queued).toHaveLength(4);
|
|
expect(
|
|
queued.every((wake) => wake.status === "deferred_issue_execution"),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
queued.map(
|
|
(wake) => (wake.payload as Record<string, unknown>).commentId,
|
|
),
|
|
).toEqual(commands.map((comment) => comment.id));
|
|
expect(
|
|
await undeliveredConversationComments(db, companyId, issue.id),
|
|
).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
for (const command of commands.slice(1, 3)) {
|
|
const reset = await runFor(issue.id, command.id);
|
|
await prepareConversationTurn(db, reset);
|
|
}
|
|
const [current] = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, issue.id));
|
|
expect(current.conversationSessionGeneration).toBe(2);
|
|
expect(current.conversationBoundaryCommentId).toBe(commands[2].id);
|
|
await instanceSettingsService(db).updateExperimental({
|
|
enableAgentChat: false,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(
|
|
await heartbeat.wakeup(agentId, {
|
|
contextSnapshot: {
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
wakeCommentId: commands[3].id,
|
|
},
|
|
}),
|
|
).toBeNull();
|
|
await instanceSettingsService(db).updateExperimental({
|
|
enableAgentChat: true,
|
|
});
|
|
} finally {
|
|
runningProcesses.delete(active.id);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
it.each([false, true])("runs real process turns and resets without replaying pre-Stop queued input (queued=%s)", async (queuedBeforeStop) => {
|
|
const runtimeCompany = randomUUID();
|
|
const runtimeAgent = randomUUID();
|
|
await db
|
|
.insert(companies)
|
|
.values({
|
|
id: runtimeCompany,
|
|
name: "Runtime chat",
|
|
issuePrefix: queuedBeforeStop ? "RCHATQ" : "RCHAT",
|
|
requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents: false,
|
|
});
|
|
const generations: unknown[] = [];
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.post("/respond", async (req, res) => {
|
|
const [run] = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(heartbeatRuns)
|
|
.where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, req.body.runId));
|
|
generations.push(run.contextSnapshot?.conversationSessionGeneration);
|
|
await issueService(db).addComment(
|
|
String(run.contextSnapshot?.issueId),
|
|
"What outcome should the task deliver?",
|
|
{ agentId: runtimeAgent, runId: run.id },
|
|
);
|
|
res.json({ ok: true });
|
|
});
|
|
const listener = app.listen(0, "127.0.0.1");
|
|
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => listener.once("listening", resolve));
|
|
const address = listener.address() as { port: number };
|
|
const cwd = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "chat-runtime-"));
|
|
const script = `fetch("http://127.0.0.1:${address.port}/respond", {method:"POST", headers:{"content-type":"application/json"}, body:JSON.stringify({runId:process.env.PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID})}).then(async r=>{if(!r.ok){console.error(r.status,await r.text());process.exitCode=1}})`;
|
|
await db
|
|
.insert(agents)
|
|
.values({
|
|
id: runtimeAgent,
|
|
companyId: runtimeCompany,
|
|
name: "Conversation runtime",
|
|
role: "engineer",
|
|
status: "idle",
|
|
adapterType: "process",
|
|
adapterConfig: {
|
|
command: process.execPath,
|
|
args: ["-e", script],
|
|
cwd,
|
|
},
|
|
runtimeConfig: { heartbeat: { enabled: false, wakeOnDemand: true } },
|
|
});
|
|
const chat = await issueService(db).create(runtimeCompany, {
|
|
title: "Runtime chat",
|
|
conversationAgentId: runtimeAgent,
|
|
conversationUserId: "local-board",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: runtimeAgent,
|
|
conversationState: "waiting",
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
});
|
|
const heartbeat = heartbeatService(db);
|
|
const send = async (body: string) => {
|
|
await issueService(db).addComment(
|
|
chat.id,
|
|
body,
|
|
{ userId: "local-board" },
|
|
{ clientRequestId: randomUUID() },
|
|
);
|
|
await deliverConversationComments(db, chat, heartbeat.wakeup);
|
|
};
|
|
const waitIdle = async () => {
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 160; i += 1) {
|
|
const current = await issueService(db).getById(chat.id);
|
|
if (isWaitingConversation(current) && !current?.executionRunId)
|
|
return;
|
|
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 50));
|
|
}
|
|
const runs = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(heartbeatRuns)
|
|
.where(eq(heartbeatRuns.agentId, runtimeAgent));
|
|
throw new Error(
|
|
JSON.stringify(
|
|
runs.map((run) => ({
|
|
status: run.status,
|
|
error: run.error,
|
|
result: run.resultJson,
|
|
})),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
};
|
|
try {
|
|
await send("Help clarify an idea");
|
|
await waitIdle();
|
|
expect(generations).toEqual([0]);
|
|
// Stop leaves a pause and a no-replay recovery disposition. /new must
|
|
// get through dispatch, release the chat pause, and reset in queue order.
|
|
await db.insert(issueTreeHolds).values({ companyId: runtimeCompany,
|
|
rootIssueId: chat.id, mode: "pause", status: "active", createdByActorType: "user",
|
|
createdByUserId: "local-board", releasePolicy: { strategy: "manual", note: "leaf_pause" },
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(issueRecoveryActions).values({ companyId: runtimeCompany,
|
|
sourceIssueId: chat.id, kind: "active_run_watchdog", ownerType: "board",
|
|
cause: "uncertain_provider_action", status: "resolved", fingerprint: randomUUID(),
|
|
evidence: { automaticRecovery: { replay: "blocked" } }, nextAction: "Do not replay the stopped turn.",
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(issueThreadInteractions).values({ companyId: runtimeCompany, issueId: chat.id,
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions", status: "pending", title: "Old topic", payload: { version: 1, questions: [{ id: "old", prompt: "Old topic?", options: [{ id: "yes", label: "Yes" }], selectionMode: "single", required: true }], supersedeOnUserComment: false },
|
|
});
|
|
let stoppedQueuedWakeId: string | null = null;
|
|
if (queuedBeforeStop) {
|
|
const [pending] = await db.insert(issueComments).values({ companyId: runtimeCompany,
|
|
issueId: chat.id, authorUserId: "local-board", body: "Old topic queued before Stop",
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
const [stoppedQueuedWake] = await db.insert(agentWakeupRequests).values({ companyId: runtimeCompany, agentId: runtimeAgent,
|
|
source: "on_demand", reason: "issue_execution_deferred", status: "deferred_issue_execution",
|
|
requestedByActorType: "user", requestedByActorId: "local-board",
|
|
payload: { issueId: chat.id, commentId: pending.id,
|
|
_paperclipWakeContext: { issueId: chat.id, wakeReason: "issue_commented", wakeCommentId: pending.id, wakeCommentIds: [pending.id] } },
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
stoppedQueuedWakeId = stoppedQueuedWake.id;
|
|
}
|
|
await send("/new");
|
|
await waitIdle();
|
|
expect((await db.select().from(issueThreadInteractions).where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, chat.id)))[0].status).toBe("expired");
|
|
expect((await db.select().from(issueTreeHolds).where(eq(issueTreeHolds.rootIssueId, chat.id)))[0].status).toBe("released");
|
|
expect(generations).toEqual([0]);
|
|
await send("A fresh idea");
|
|
await waitIdle();
|
|
expect(generations).toEqual([0, 1]);
|
|
if (stoppedQueuedWakeId) {
|
|
const [stoppedWake] = await db.select().from(agentWakeupRequests).where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, stoppedQueuedWakeId));
|
|
expect(stoppedWake).toMatchObject({ status: "cancelled", runId: null });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
await heartbeat.wakeup(runtimeAgent, {
|
|
source: "automation",
|
|
contextSnapshot: { issueId: chat.id },
|
|
}),
|
|
).toBeNull();
|
|
const history = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueComments)
|
|
.where(eq(issueComments.issueId, chat.id));
|
|
expect(history).toHaveLength(queuedBeforeStop ? 6 : 5);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => listener.close(() => resolve()));
|
|
await rm(cwd, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
}
|
|
}, 30000);
|
|
it("parks successful native interaction-only turns without consuming unrelated or stale gates", async () => {
|
|
const chat = await create();
|
|
const message = await issueService(db).addComment(chat.id, "Plan the work", { userId: "local-board" });
|
|
const run = await runFor(chat.id, message.id);
|
|
const prepared = await prepareConversationTurn(db, run);
|
|
const succeeded = { ...run, contextSnapshot: prepared.context, status: "succeeded" };
|
|
const [interaction] = await db.insert(issueThreadInteractions).values({
|
|
companyId, issueId: chat.id, sourceRunId: run.id, createdByAgentId: agentId,
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation", status: "answered", payload: { version: 1, prompt: "Proceed?" },
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
expect(await settleConversationTurn(db, succeeded)).toBe(false);
|
|
await db.update(issueThreadInteractions).set({ status: "pending", sourceRunId: null })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interaction.id));
|
|
expect(await settleConversationTurn(db, succeeded)).toBe(false);
|
|
await db.update(issueThreadInteractions).set({ sourceRunId: run.id })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interaction.id));
|
|
for (const status of ["failed", "cancelled", "timed_out"]) {
|
|
expect(await settleConversationTurn(db, { ...succeeded, status })).toBe(false);
|
|
}
|
|
await db.update(issueThreadInteractions).set({ createdByAgentId: null })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interaction.id));
|
|
expect(await settleConversationTurn(db, succeeded)).toBe(false);
|
|
await db.update(issueThreadInteractions).set({ createdByAgentId: agentId })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interaction.id));
|
|
expect(await settleConversationTurn(db, { ...succeeded,
|
|
contextSnapshot: { ...prepared.context, conversationSessionGeneration: -1 },
|
|
})).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(await settleConversationTurn(db, succeeded)).toBe(true);
|
|
const [idle] = await db.select().from(issues).where(eq(issues.id, chat.id));
|
|
expect(isWaitingConversation(idle)).toBe(true);
|
|
const [pending] = await db.select().from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interaction.id));
|
|
expect(pending.status).toBe("pending");
|
|
});
|
|
it("rejects late replies and session events from cancelled conversation turns", async () => {
|
|
const chat = await create();
|
|
const message = await issueService(db).addComment(chat.id, "Old topic", { userId: "local-board" });
|
|
const run = await runFor(chat.id, message.id);
|
|
await prepareConversationTurn(db, run);
|
|
await db.update(heartbeatRuns).set({ status: "cancelled" }).where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, run.id));
|
|
const previousSecret = process.env.PAPERCLIP_AGENT_JWT_SECRET;
|
|
process.env.PAPERCLIP_AGENT_JWT_SECRET = "test-conversation-cancellation-secret";
|
|
try {
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(actorMiddleware(db, { deploymentMode: "local_trusted" }));
|
|
app.post("/mutate", (_req, res) => res.sendStatus(204));
|
|
const token = createLocalAgentJwt(agentId, companyId, "process", run.id)!;
|
|
expect((await request(app).post("/mutate").set("Authorization", `Bearer ${token}`)).status).toBe(403);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
if (previousSecret === undefined) delete process.env.PAPERCLIP_AGENT_JWT_SECRET;
|
|
else process.env.PAPERCLIP_AGENT_JWT_SECRET = previousSecret;
|
|
}
|
|
await expect(issueService(db).addComment(chat.id, "Late old reply", { agentId, runId: run.id }))
|
|
.rejects.toThrow(/cancelled/);
|
|
expect(await applyRunnerGoalPrpEvent(db, { companyId, agentId, issueId: chat.id, adapterType: "process" }, {
|
|
eventType: "session.capabilities.updated", sourceRunId: run.id, sourceSeq: 500, payload: {},
|
|
})).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
it("ignores execution dependency wakes during active and idle chat turns", async () => {
|
|
const chat = await create();
|
|
const heartbeat = heartbeatService(db);
|
|
const blocker = await issueService(db).create(companyId, { title: "Linked execution", status: "done" });
|
|
await issueService(db).update(chat.id, { blockedByIssueIds: [blocker.id] });
|
|
const ordinary = await issueService(db).create(companyId, {
|
|
title: "Ordinary dependent",
|
|
status: "in_review",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
|
|
blockedByIssueIds: [blocker.id],
|
|
});
|
|
for (const state of [
|
|
{ status: "in_review", conversationState: "waiting" as const },
|
|
{ status: "blocked", conversationState: "active" as const },
|
|
]) {
|
|
await db.update(issues).set(state).where(eq(issues.id, chat.id));
|
|
for (const reason of ["issue_blockers_resolved", "issue_children_completed", "issue_unblock_requested"]) {
|
|
expect(await heartbeat.wakeup(agentId, {
|
|
source: "automation",
|
|
reason,
|
|
contextSnapshot: { issueId: chat.id, wakeReason: reason },
|
|
})).toBeNull();
|
|
}
|
|
expect((await issueService(db).listWakeableBlockedDependents(blocker.id)).map((issue) => issue.id))
|
|
.toEqual([ordinary.id]);
|
|
}
|
|
expect((await issueService(db).getDependencyReadiness(chat.id)).blockerIssueIds).toEqual([blocker.id]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each([
|
|
{ name: "reset idle chat", generation: 1, sourceGeneration: 0, waiting: true, ordinary: false, superseded: true },
|
|
{ name: "reset active chat", generation: 1, sourceGeneration: 0, waiting: false, ordinary: false, superseded: true },
|
|
{ name: "newer reply in the same session", generation: 1, sourceGeneration: 1, waiting: true, ordinary: false, superseded: true },
|
|
{ name: "current unanswered chat turn", generation: 1, sourceGeneration: 1, waiting: false, ordinary: false, superseded: false },
|
|
{ name: "unprepared failure without a session generation", generation: 1, sourceGeneration: undefined, waiting: true, ordinary: false, superseded: false },
|
|
{ name: "ordinary review task", generation: 0, sourceGeneration: 0, waiting: true, ordinary: true, superseded: false },
|
|
])("guards delayed cancelled-run recovery for $name", async (scenario) => {
|
|
const task = scenario.ordinary
|
|
? await issueService(db).create(companyId, { title: "Ordinary review", status: "in_review", assigneeAgentId: agentId })
|
|
: await create();
|
|
const status = scenario.waiting ? "in_review" : "in_progress";
|
|
await db.update(issues).set({
|
|
status,
|
|
...(scenario.ordinary ? {} : {
|
|
conversationSessionGeneration: scenario.generation,
|
|
conversationState: scenario.waiting ? "waiting" : "active",
|
|
}),
|
|
}).where(eq(issues.id, task.id));
|
|
const run = await runFor(task.id, randomUUID(), {
|
|
conversationSessionGeneration: scenario.sourceGeneration,
|
|
});
|
|
await terminalizeLegacyExecution({ db, run, status: "cancelled", patch: { finishedAt: new Date() } });
|
|
let actions = await db.select().from(issueRecoveryActions).where(eq(issueRecoveryActions.sourceIssueId, task.id));
|
|
expect(actions).toHaveLength(scenario.superseded ? 0 : 1);
|
|
// Also exercise an action queued before /new or the newer reply settled.
|
|
if (!actions.length) {
|
|
actions = await db.insert(issueRecoveryActions).values({
|
|
companyId, sourceIssueId: task.id, kind: "active_run_watchdog",
|
|
ownerType: "board", returnOwnerAgentId: agentId,
|
|
cause: LEGACY_RECOVERY_CAUSE, fingerprint: `legacy-execution:${run.id}`,
|
|
evidence: { runId: run.id }, nextAction: "Reconcile stopped work",
|
|
}).returning();
|
|
}
|
|
await settleUnrecoverableExecutions(db);
|
|
const [after] = await db.select().from(issues).where(eq(issues.id, task.id));
|
|
const [action] = await db.select().from(issueRecoveryActions).where(eq(issueRecoveryActions.id, actions[0]!.id));
|
|
expect(after.status).toBe(scenario.superseded ? status : "blocked");
|
|
expect(action).toMatchObject({ status: "resolved", outcome: scenario.superseded ? "cancelled" : "blocked" });
|
|
expect((await db.select().from(heartbeatRuns).where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, run.id)))[0].status).toBe("cancelled");
|
|
if (!scenario.ordinary) expect(after.conversationSessionGeneration).toBe(scenario.generation);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each(["answered", "new-message", "response-less", "failed", "stale-session", "failed-gap", "missing-gap"])("settles a historical question using completed conversation progress (%s)", async scenario => {
|
|
const chat = await create();
|
|
const svc = issueService(db);
|
|
const first = await svc.addComment(chat.id, "Which color?", { userId: "local-board" });
|
|
const original = await runFor(chat.id, first.id);
|
|
const [question] = await db.insert(issueThreadInteractions).values({ companyId, issueId: chat.id,
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions", status: "answered", continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee", sourceRunId: original.id,
|
|
createdByAgentId: agentId, resolvedByUserId: "local-board", payload: { version: 1, questions: [] }, result: { version: 1, answers: [] } }).returning();
|
|
if (scenario === "failed-gap" || scenario === "missing-gap") {
|
|
const skipped = await svc.addComment(chat.id, "This request still needs an answer.", { userId: "local-board" });
|
|
if (scenario === "failed-gap") {
|
|
const failed = await runFor(chat.id, skipped.id, { conversationSessionGeneration: 0 });
|
|
await db.update(heartbeatRuns).set({ status: "failed" }).where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, failed.id));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
const newer = await svc.addComment(chat.id, "What is the capital of France?", { userId: "local-board" });
|
|
const replyRun = await runFor(chat.id, newer.id, { conversationSessionGeneration: 0 });
|
|
if (scenario !== "response-less") await svc.addComment(chat.id, "Paris.", { agentId, runId: replyRun.id });
|
|
await db.update(heartbeatRuns).set({ status: scenario === "failed" ? "failed" : "succeeded",
|
|
...(scenario === "stale-session" ? { contextSnapshot: { ...replyRun.contextSnapshot, conversationSessionGeneration: 99 } } : {}) }).where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, replyRun.id));
|
|
const answerRun = await runFor(chat.id, first.id, { source: "issue.interaction.respond", interactionId: question.id,
|
|
interactionKind: "ask_user_questions", interactionStatus: "answered" });
|
|
const prepared = await prepareConversationTurn(db, answerRun);
|
|
const preparedContext: Record<string, unknown> = prepared.context;
|
|
expect(preparedContext.wakeCommentId).toBe(first.id);
|
|
expect(preparedContext.conversationReplyBoundaryCommentId).toBe(["answered", "new-message"].includes(scenario) ? newer.id : first.id);
|
|
// A retry reuses the frozen boundary, even if another message has arrived.
|
|
if (scenario === "new-message") await svc.addComment(chat.id, "New instructions while you answer", { userId: "local-board" });
|
|
const retry = await prepareConversationTurn(db, { ...answerRun, contextSnapshot: prepared.context });
|
|
const retryContext: Record<string, unknown> = retry.context;
|
|
expect(retryContext.conversationReplyBoundaryCommentId).toBe(preparedContext.conversationReplyBoundaryCommentId);
|
|
await svc.addComment(chat.id, "You chose Blue.", { agentId, runId: answerRun.id });
|
|
expect(await settleConversationTurn(db, { ...answerRun, status: "succeeded", contextSnapshot: prepared.context })).toBe(true);
|
|
const [settled] = await db.select().from(issues).where(eq(issues.id, chat.id));
|
|
expect(settled.conversationState).toBe(scenario === "answered" ? "waiting" : "active");
|
|
expect(retryContext.conversationReplayThroughCommentId).toBe(preparedContext.conversationReplayThroughCommentId);
|
|
const replay = await conversationReplay(db, companyId, chat.id, first.id,
|
|
preparedContext.conversationReplayThroughCommentId as string);
|
|
if (["answered", "new-message"].includes(scenario)) {
|
|
expect(replay).toContain("What is the capital of France?");
|
|
expect(replay).toContain("Paris.");
|
|
} else {
|
|
expect(replay).not.toContain("What is the capital of France?");
|
|
expect(replay).not.toContain("Paris.");
|
|
}
|
|
expect(replay).not.toContain("This request still needs an answer.");
|
|
expect(replay).not.toContain("New instructions while you answer");
|
|
expect(replay).not.toContain("You chose Blue.");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("only parks answered turns and preserves idle across recovery classification", async () => {
|
|
const issue = await create();
|
|
const message = await issueService(db).addComment(
|
|
issue.id,
|
|
"Which goal matters?",
|
|
{ userId: "local-board" },
|
|
);
|
|
const run = await runFor(issue.id, message.id);
|
|
const prepared = await prepareConversationTurn(db, run);
|
|
const succeeded = {
|
|
...run,
|
|
contextSnapshot: prepared.context,
|
|
status: "succeeded",
|
|
};
|
|
expect(await settleConversationTurn(db, succeeded)).toBe(false);
|
|
await issueService(db).addComment(
|
|
issue.id,
|
|
"What outcome should the task deliver?",
|
|
{ agentId, runId: run.id },
|
|
);
|
|
expect(await settleConversationTurn(db, succeeded)).toBe(true);
|
|
const [idle] = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, issue.id));
|
|
expect(isWaitingConversation(idle)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
classifyIssueGraphLiveness({
|
|
issues: [idle],
|
|
relations: [],
|
|
agents: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
).toEqual([]);
|
|
await instanceSettingsService(db).updateExperimental({
|
|
enableAgentChat: false,
|
|
});
|
|
await expect(
|
|
issueService(db).addComment(issue.id, "/new", {
|
|
userId: "local-board",
|
|
}),
|
|
).rejects.toThrow(/disabled/);
|
|
expect(
|
|
isWaitingConversation(
|
|
(await db.select().from(issues).where(eq(issues.id, issue.id)))[0],
|
|
),
|
|
).toBe(true);
|
|
await instanceSettingsService(db).updateExperimental({
|
|
enableAgentChat: true,
|
|
});
|
|
const child = await issueService(db).create(companyId, { title: "Execute work", status: "done" });
|
|
await db.update(issues).set({ parentId: issue.id }).where(eq(issues.id, child.id));
|
|
expect(
|
|
await issueService(db).getWakeableParentAfterChildCompletion(issue.id, {
|
|
issueId: child.id,
|
|
summary: "Finished",
|
|
}),
|
|
).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
describe("conversation execution wake policy", () => {
|
|
it.each(["issue_blockers_resolved", "issue_children_completed", "issue_unblock_requested"])(
|
|
"suppresses %s only for conversation containers",
|
|
(reason) => {
|
|
expect(isConversationExecutionWake({ conversationAgentId: "agent", conversationUserId: "user" }, reason)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(isConversationExecutionWake({}, reason)).toBe(false);
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
it.each(["issue_commented", "interaction_resolved", "run_failed", "issue_recovery_action_restored"])(
|
|
"preserves %s handling for pending conversation turns",
|
|
(reason) => expect(isConversationExecutionWake({ conversationAgentId: "agent", conversationUserId: "user" }, reason)).toBe(false),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("chat prompt policy", () => {
|
|
it("preserves explicit plan approval while avoiding ritual confirmations for ordinary chat", () => {
|
|
expect(AGENT_CHAT_DIRECTIVE).toContain("When the user asks to approve a plan before handoff");
|
|
expect(AGENT_CHAT_DIRECTIVE).toContain('interactionKind: "confirmation"');
|
|
expect(AGENT_CHAT_DIRECTIVE).toContain("targetRevisionId from the saved document's latestRevisionId");
|
|
expect(AGENT_CHAT_DIRECTIVE).toContain('payload.target to { type: "issue_document", key: "plan", revisionId: latestRevisionId }');
|
|
expect(AGENT_CHAT_DIRECTIVE).toContain("ordinary conversation replies and draft planning do not need confirmation");
|
|
expect(AGENT_CHAT_DIRECTIVE).toContain("In Ask mode, discuss the plan without creating or revising documents or approval cards");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each([true, false])("preserves rejected-plan changes in task markdown (includeDescription=%s)", (includeDescription) => {
|
|
const prompt = buildPaperclipTaskMarkdown({
|
|
issue: { id: "chat", identifier: null, title: "Chat", workMode: "planning", conversationAgentId: "agent" },
|
|
interaction: { kind: "request_confirmation", status: "rejected" },
|
|
planReview: { status: "rejected", reason: "Add CHAT_REVIEW_MARKER and a validation step." },
|
|
acceptedPlanContinuation: true,
|
|
acceptedPlan: { revisionId: "stale-approved-plan" },
|
|
includeDescription,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Rejected plan review directive:");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Add CHAT_REVIEW_MARKER and a validation step.");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("not approval to implement or hand off execution tasks");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("first GET /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/plan");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("baseRevisionId set to that latestRevisionId");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Bind the new approval request to the revision returned by the successful update");
|
|
expect(prompt).not.toContain("Accepted chat plan directive:");
|
|
expect(prompt).not.toContain("stale-approved-plan");
|
|
});
|
|
it.each(["standard", "ask", "planning"])(
|
|
"keeps handoff instructions in %s, including accepted plans and resumes",
|
|
(workMode) => {
|
|
const prompt = buildPaperclipTaskMarkdown({
|
|
issue: {
|
|
id: "chat",
|
|
identifier: null,
|
|
title: "Chat",
|
|
workMode,
|
|
conversationAgentId: "agent",
|
|
description: "Pre-boundary summary that must not replay",
|
|
},
|
|
acceptedPlanContinuation: true,
|
|
includeDescription: true,
|
|
acceptedPlan: { revisionId: "old-approved-plan" },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain(AGENT_CHAT_DIRECTIVE);
|
|
expect(prompt).not.toContain("Pre-boundary summary");
|
|
expect(prompt).not.toContain("old-approved-plan");
|
|
expect(prompt).not.toContain("Implement the accepted plan on this issue");
|
|
expect(prompt).toContain("Create and link each task before claiming it exists");
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("native conversation finalization", () => {
|
|
it("does not require execution completion or schedule a continuation after a successful chat turn", () => {
|
|
const decision = {
|
|
policyVersion: NATIVE_STATUS_ARBITER_POLICY_VERSION,
|
|
statusAction: "in_progress",
|
|
toStatus: "in_progress",
|
|
reasonCode: "completion_evidence_incomplete",
|
|
unblockDescriptor: null,
|
|
effects: [
|
|
{
|
|
kind: "enqueue_continuation",
|
|
continuationKind: "same_agent",
|
|
summary: "Finish",
|
|
idempotencyKey: "next",
|
|
agentId: "agent",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
} as Parameters<typeof conversationNativeDecision>[0]["decision"];
|
|
const input = {
|
|
conversation: true,
|
|
terminalState: "succeeded",
|
|
workspaceFinalizeStatus: "succeeded",
|
|
hasGovernanceGate: false,
|
|
priorStatus: "in_progress" as const,
|
|
decision,
|
|
};
|
|
expect(conversationNativeDecision(input)).toMatchObject({
|
|
statusAction: "preserve",
|
|
effects: [],
|
|
});
|
|
expect(
|
|
conversationNativeDecision({ ...input, hasGovernanceGate: true }),
|
|
).toBe(decision);
|
|
expect(
|
|
conversationNativeDecision({ ...input, terminalState: "failed" }),
|
|
).toBe(decision);
|
|
expect(conversationNativeDecision({ ...input, conversation: false })).toBe(
|
|
decision,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|