mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-14 00:14:02 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The chat-feature evals measure whether agents complete real chat requests through the product > - The chat catalog eval harness and its repairs live on the `chat-eval/master-candidate` branch, not on master > - Today's work made 139 of 242 chat evals pass in verified single-case live runs. Each product fix landed on master as its own pull request > - The eval-side changes (setups, graders, fault seams, evidence capture) still exist only on the candidate > - This pull request lands the harness on master. Master stays the source of truth for product behavior > - The benefit is one tree: evals run against master commits, and product fixes reach the evals as soon as they merge ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19441, Refs #19599, Refs #20270, Refs #20334, Refs #20342, Refs #20344, Refs #20354, Refs #20360, Refs #20373, Refs #20382, Refs #20409 **What existing behavior does this improve?** The chat catalog eval harness and the product it evaluates live on a long-running branch outside master. Eval fixes do not reach master, so master-based eval runs use old setups and graders. **Subsystem affected** `tests/runner-e2e` chat catalog harness, plus a small set of product changes that exist only on the candidate. **Proposed change** Land the harness on master. Every product fix from this eval work already merged to master as its own pull request. Conflicts keep master's product behavior. ## What Changed - Most of the diff (808 of 851 files) is under `tests/runner-e2e/`: chat-catalog domains, scenarios, descriptors, the TestOps manifest, private evidence tooling, and their tests. - Graders now check saved state, setup literals and rendered or clicked links. Many keyword and regex checks on free-form replies are removed. Each changed grader has a bumped `oracleVersion` and calibration tests (a valid reply, a reworded valid reply, and broken variants that must fail). - The shared link helper `hasLink` no longer treats a list link (for example `/COM/issues?view=mine`) as a link to every task without a URL key. - Setup fixes build real state through supported product routes: routine history, agent grants through the board grant route, budget holds with a real cap, and a storage-layer archive fault for `inbox-search.archive-partial-failure`. - Browser boundary journeys (sign-in, chat-disabled, onboarding) now write the standard pass evidence files. - Retargeted cases, approved by the maintainer: `agent-chat.chat-disabled` (Conference Room gate), `agents.restore-instructions` (no saved instruction history), `access.manage-membership` (member permission edits stay board-only). - The private evidence trusted files (`manual-private-handoff.ts`, `manual-private-retention.ts`, `manual-private-report-assets.ts`) are byte-identical to master. - Product files outside `tests/` (43 files, +1,328 −49) carry candidate-only changes that master does not yet have. Most are tests. The main code changes are in `request-human-input.ts`, `heartbeat-run-summary.ts`, `native-completion-feedback.ts`, `native-run-finalizer.ts`, `openapi.ts`, `secrets.ts` and `IssueChatLongThreadPerf.tsx`. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run chat-catalog-domains chat-catalog-contract.test.ts chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts unit-launcher.test.mjs --testTimeout=180000` in `tests/runner-e2e`: 269 files pass, 3,550 tests pass. - `node --test chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs`: 10 pass. - `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`: no change. - `tsc` for `server` and `tests/runner-e2e`: clean. - Live single-case verification: 139 of 242 cases passed on paid runs, and a person read the saved evidence for each. These are single-case runs, not one full-cohort run. ## Risks - Large diff. Most of it is test-only, but the 43 non-test files change product code paths. Review those files first. - Some graders are now less strict on reply wording. A person must read replies for meaning on those cases. - 42 cases need disposable outside accounts (Notion, Slack, GitHub, Daytona and others) and stay blocked. `access.invite-teammate` stays failing until local agent isolation lands, because the runner's durable state keeps a live invite token. - The paid workflow compares the trusted private-evidence files with master. They are unchanged, so this risk is low. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code execution, in Claude Code. Subagents used the same model. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
40 lines
6.3 KiB
TypeScript
40 lines
6.3 KiB
TypeScript
import { expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import { gradeApprovalQueue, acornNamingDirection, ordinaryApprovalEntries } from "./runtime-approval-queue.js";
|
|
function valid() {
|
|
const payload = { questionSet: { questions: [{ id: "name", prompt: "What is the product name?" }] } };
|
|
return { scenarioId: "steering.approval-delivery", companyId: "company", leadId: "ceo", agents: [], links: [], humanQueries: [], reply: "", tasks: [{ id: "website" }], activity: [],
|
|
runs: [{ id: "prior", status: "succeeded" }, { id: "canonical", status: "succeeded" }, { id: "consumer", status: "succeeded" }],
|
|
state: { task: { id: "website" }, worker: { id: "morgan" }, humanId: "human", workerRunId: "prior", workerWasReallyWaiting: true, ordinaryQueueOwned: true, ordinaryQueuedBeforeAnswer: true,
|
|
questionBefore: { id: "question", kind: "ask_user_questions", status: "pending", issueId: "website", createdByAgentId: "morgan", sourceRunId: "prior", payload },
|
|
questionAfter: { id: "question", status: "answered", resolvedByUserId: "human" as string | null, resolvedByAgentId: null as string | null, payload, result: { answers: [{ questionId: "name", otherText: "Acorn" }] } },
|
|
responseRetainedAcrossOrdinaryMutations: true, responseUneditable: true, queryReply: "Use Acorn for the existing naming question; submit that bound answer through its supported response control.",
|
|
actualOrdinaryEdit: true, actualOrdinaryReorder: true, ordinaryReorderRestricted: false, actualOrdinaryDiscard: true, humanAnswerSubmitted: true, canonicalAnswerAttributed: false,
|
|
responseQueue: { entries: [{ source: { kind: "interaction", interactionId: "question" }, canEdit: false, canDiscard: false }] }, consumingRunCount: 1, responseNativeInputBound: true, queueEmptyAfterDelivery: true, actualAcornResult: true, initialWorkRetained: true } };
|
|
}
|
|
it("accepts real human response retained separately from mutated ordinary comments", () => expect(gradeApprovalQueue(valid()).passed).toBe(true));
|
|
it("accepts a permitted actual canonical agent response with native source attribution", () => { const o = valid(); Object.assign(o.state, { canonicalAnswerAttributed: true, humanAnswerSubmitted: false, queryReply: "I answered Morgan's naming question with Acorn; the response is saved for normal continuation." }); Object.assign(o.state.questionAfter, { resolvedByUserId: null, resolvedByAgentId: "ceo" }); expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(true); });
|
|
it("accepts natural correct-answer guidance", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.queryReply = "The product name is Acorn. Use the question's response card so this decision stays attached to the naming request."; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(true); });
|
|
it("rejects a fabricated question without actual prior native provenance", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.questionBefore.createdByAgentId = "other"; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects an ordinary comment masquerading as bound response", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.responseQueue.entries[0]!.source.kind = "comment"; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects wrong accepted answer", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.questionAfter.result.answers[0]!.otherText = "Other"; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects revoking the decision by discarding ordinary text", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.responseRetainedAcrossOrdinaryMutations = false; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects an editable interaction response", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.responseQueue.entries[0]!.canEdit = true; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects source claim of answering without an attributed actual answer", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.queryReply = "I have answered with Acorn."; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects unsupported actor answering for the human", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.questionAfter.resolvedByUserId = "other"; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects ordinary message operations performed on a different queue", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.actualOrdinaryReorder = false; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects duplicate decision consumers", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.consumingRunCount = 2; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects native input lacking the bound question ID and answer", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.responseNativeInputBound = false; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects loss of earlier settled work", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.initialWorkRetained = false; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it("rejects missing actual response evidence", () => expect(gradeApprovalQueue(undefined).passed).toBe(false));
|
|
|
|
it.each(["Use Birch, not Acorn, as the name", "Acorn is wrong; use Birch for the product name", "The requested name was Acorn; Use Birch instead to answer the question"])("rejects contradictory named direction without rescue by later human input", reply => { const o = valid(); o.state.queryReply = reply; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(false); });
|
|
it.each(["Use Acorn, not Birch, as the product name", "The answer is Acorn; submit it on the naming question", "Name it Acorn and retain the actual answer on the response card"])("accepts natural correct naming direction", reply => expect(acornNamingDirection(reply)).toBe(true));
|
|
it("restricts every mutating ID to ordinary entries in a mixed two-comment plus response queue", () => {
|
|
const ordinary = { comment: { id: "ordinary" } }, response = { source: { kind: "interaction" }, comment: { id: "decision" } };
|
|
const ids = ordinaryApprovalEntries({ entries: [ordinary, response, { comment: { id: "other" } }] } as Parameters<typeof ordinaryApprovalEntries>[0]).map(row => row.comment.id);
|
|
expect(ids).toEqual(["ordinary", "other"]); expect(ids).not.toContain("decision");
|
|
});
|
|
it("accepts the real mixed-queue UI reorder refusal while preserving immutable decision placement", () => { const o = valid(); o.state.actualOrdinaryReorder = false; o.state.ordinaryReorderRestricted = true; expect(gradeApprovalQueue(o).passed).toBe(true); });
|
|
|
|
it("accepts explicit rejection of a different name while selecting the actual answer", () => expect(acornNamingDirection("Do not use Birch; the product name is Acorn.")).toBe(true));
|