mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-10 03:08:10 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Issue interactions give agents and people a structured decision record. > - Resolver routes used different authorization rules. > - Some routes blocked valid agents, including task watchdogs with normal issue access. > - The API did not show who could resolve a pending interaction. > - This pull request gives every interaction kind one resolver policy evaluator. > - The benefit is a clear decision path with consistent governance and company isolation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes: #8087 Refs: #7403 Related PR: #11082 proposes board-only confirmation rules. This change keeps human-only review as an explicit policy. **What happened?** Agents could create issue interactions. Some resolver routes still required board access. This left valid agent confirmations pending. Task watchdogs could see the same problem without board identity. **Expected behavior** Every interaction kind must use one resolver policy contract. The contract must support `anyone`, `not_creator`, and `human_only`. It must also apply all normal governance controls. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a `request_confirmation` interaction as an agent. 2. Resolve it with another authorized agent. 3. Observe the board-only denial. **Paperclip version or commit** The problem exists on `master` before this change. **Deployment mode** Local development with `pnpm dev`. ## What Changed - Add canonical policies for `anyone`, `not_creator`, and `human_only`. - Use one server evaluator for every interaction kind. - Apply named addressees, company limits, review rules, and task watchdog scope. - Charge cross-issue resolutions to the existing per-run action limit. - Return the effective resolver audience in attention and interaction data. - Show the audience, governance choices, and denial reasons in the board UI. - Add telemetry, API documents, product documents, and regression fixtures. - Add migration provenance for safe legacy behavior. - Make migration `0218` safe for complete replays and partial prior runs. ## Product Rules - An interaction records a response. It does not grant authority for the next action. - `anyone` lets any authorized issue participant respond. - `not_creator` requires a responder other than the interaction creator. - `human_only` requires an authorized person. - A named addressee, company policy, or governed action can narrow the audience. - These controls cannot widen the audience. - A task watchdog uses the same rules as an ordinary agent. - A task watchdog does not receive board authority. - An agent resolution on another issue uses the shared cross-issue action limit. - Legacy pending interactions keep their earlier restrictions. - The UI shows the effective audience and a permanent denial reason. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db check:migrations` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/db/src/issue-thread-interaction-resolver-policy-migration.test.ts` - The focused PostgreSQL test applies migration `0218` twice. - The test also completes a partial prior run and preserves existing provenance. - The latest GitHub head has 29 successful checks. - The opt-in Storybook visual check skipped as expected. - Greptile reports 5/5 with no open comments. ## Risks - New interaction writes use `anyone` by default. - Callers must select `not_creator` or `human_only` when they need stricter review. - Legacy pending interactions keep the old creator and human restrictions. - Migration `0218` fills only missing provenance fields during recovery. - Cross-issue resolutions can reach the existing action limit. - The shared evaluator affects every interaction kind. - Route, service, database, shared contract, and UI tests cover these rules. > This work matches the Agent Reviews and Approvals direction in `ROADMAP.md`. It does not duplicate a planned item. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime does not expose the exact deployment ID or context window. The agent used reasoning, repository tools, shell commands, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked public issues or described the issue with the required labels - [x] I have not referenced internal Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open comments - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
375 lines
15 KiB
TypeScript
375 lines
15 KiB
TypeScript
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import { getTableName } from "drizzle-orm";
|
|
|
|
const mockCreateChild = vi.fn();
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("./issues.js", () => ({
|
|
issueService: () => ({
|
|
createChild: mockCreateChild,
|
|
}),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
type SelectRow = Record<string, unknown>;
|
|
|
|
function createSelectChain(rows: SelectRow[]) {
|
|
return {
|
|
from() {
|
|
return {
|
|
where() {
|
|
return {
|
|
then(callback: (rows: SelectRow[]) => unknown) {
|
|
return Promise.resolve(callback(rows));
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function createFakeDb(args: {
|
|
interactionRow: Record<string, unknown>;
|
|
parentRows?: SelectRow[];
|
|
}) {
|
|
let interactionRow = { ...args.interactionRow };
|
|
const issueTouches: Array<Record<string, unknown>> = [];
|
|
const interactionUpdates: Array<Record<string, unknown>> = [];
|
|
const toolActionRequestUpdates: Array<Record<string, unknown>> = [];
|
|
let selectCallCount = 0;
|
|
|
|
const db: any = {
|
|
select: vi.fn(() => {
|
|
selectCallCount += 1;
|
|
return createSelectChain(selectCallCount === 1 ? [interactionRow] : (args.parentRows ?? []));
|
|
}),
|
|
update: vi.fn((table: unknown) => ({
|
|
set(values: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
|
return {
|
|
where() {
|
|
if (getTableName(table as never) === "tool_action_requests") {
|
|
toolActionRequestUpdates.push(values);
|
|
return Promise.resolve(undefined);
|
|
}
|
|
if ("status" in values || "result" in values || "resolvedAt" in values) {
|
|
interactionUpdates.push(values);
|
|
interactionRow = { ...interactionRow, ...values };
|
|
return {
|
|
returning: async () => [interactionRow],
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
if ("updatedAt" in values) {
|
|
issueTouches.push(values);
|
|
return Promise.resolve(undefined);
|
|
}
|
|
throw new Error(`Unexpected update target: ${String(table)}`);
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
},
|
|
})),
|
|
insert: vi.fn(),
|
|
transaction: async (callback: (tx: typeof db) => Promise<void>) => callback(db),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
db,
|
|
getInteractionRow: () => interactionRow,
|
|
issueTouches,
|
|
interactionUpdates,
|
|
toolActionRequestUpdates,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issueThreadInteractionService", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each([
|
|
["ask_user_questions", undefined, {}, "anyone", "anyone", "inherited", "requested"],
|
|
["suggest_tasks", undefined, {}, "anyone", "anyone", "inherited", "requested"],
|
|
["request_confirmation", "board_or_agents", {}, "anyone", "anyone", "explicit", "requested"],
|
|
["request_confirmation", "board_only", {}, "human_only", "human_only", "explicit", "requested"],
|
|
["request_checkbox_confirmation", undefined, { request_checkbox_confirmation: { defaultPolicy: "not_creator" } }, "not_creator", "not_creator", "inherited", "requested"],
|
|
["request_item_verdicts", "anyone", { request_item_verdicts: { cap: "not_creator" } }, "anyone", "not_creator", "explicit", "company_cap"],
|
|
] as const)(
|
|
"resolves %s requested/default/cap policy snapshots",
|
|
async (kind, requested, governance, expectedRequested, expectedEffective, expectedProvenance, expectedSource) => {
|
|
const { resolveInteractionPolicy } = await import("./issue-thread-interactions.js");
|
|
expect(resolveInteractionPolicy({
|
|
kind,
|
|
requested,
|
|
governance,
|
|
hasToolAction: false,
|
|
})).toEqual({
|
|
requestedResolverPolicy: expectedRequested,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: expectedEffective,
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance: expectedProvenance,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicySource: expectedSource,
|
|
});
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
it("always clamps tool-action confirmations to human-only", async () => {
|
|
const { resolveInteractionPolicy } = await import("./issue-thread-interactions.js");
|
|
expect(resolveInteractionPolicy({
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
requested: "board_or_agents",
|
|
governance: { request_confirmation: { defaultPolicy: "board_or_agents", cap: "board_or_agents" } },
|
|
hasToolAction: true,
|
|
})).toEqual({
|
|
requestedResolverPolicy: "anyone",
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: "human_only",
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance: "explicit",
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicySource: "governed_action",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("create reuses an existing interaction for the same idempotency key", async () => {
|
|
const { issueThreadInteractionService } = await import("./issue-thread-interactions.js");
|
|
|
|
const existingRow = {
|
|
id: "interaction-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
requestedResolverPolicy: "anyone",
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: "anyone",
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance: "inherited",
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicySource: "requested",
|
|
idempotencyKey: "run-1:suggest",
|
|
sourceCommentId: null,
|
|
sourceRunId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
title: "Break the work down",
|
|
summary: "Created from the current agent run.",
|
|
createdByAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: null,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
tasks: [{ clientKey: "task-1", title: "One" }],
|
|
},
|
|
result: null,
|
|
resolvedAt: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-20T10:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-20T10:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const db: any = {
|
|
select: vi.fn(() => createSelectChain([existingRow])),
|
|
insert: vi.fn(),
|
|
update: vi.fn(),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const svc = issueThreadInteractionService(db as never);
|
|
const created = await svc.create({
|
|
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
}, {
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
idempotencyKey: "run-1:suggest",
|
|
sourceRunId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
title: "Break the work down",
|
|
summary: "Created from the current agent run.",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
tasks: [{ clientKey: "task-1", title: "One" }],
|
|
},
|
|
}, {
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(created.id).toBe("interaction-1");
|
|
expect(created.idempotencyKey).toBe("run-1:suggest");
|
|
expect(db.insert).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("answerQuestions normalizes duplicate option ids and persists answered results", async () => {
|
|
const { issueThreadInteractionService } = await import("./issue-thread-interactions.js");
|
|
|
|
const interactionRow = {
|
|
id: "interaction-2",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
sourceCommentId: null,
|
|
sourceRunId: null,
|
|
title: null,
|
|
summary: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "local-board",
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: null,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
questions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "scope",
|
|
prompt: "Pick one scope",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
required: true,
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "phase-1", label: "Phase 1" },
|
|
{ id: "phase-2", label: "Phase 2" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: "extras",
|
|
prompt: "Pick extras",
|
|
selectionMode: "multi",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "tests", label: "Tests" },
|
|
{ id: "docs", label: "Docs" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
result: null,
|
|
resolvedAt: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-04-20T10:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-04-20T10:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
const state = createFakeDb({ interactionRow });
|
|
const svc = issueThreadInteractionService(state.db as never);
|
|
|
|
const result = await svc.answerQuestions({
|
|
id: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
}, "interaction-2", {
|
|
answers: [
|
|
{ questionId: "scope", optionIds: ["phase-1"] },
|
|
{ questionId: "extras", optionIds: ["docs", "tests", "docs"] },
|
|
],
|
|
summaryMarkdown: "Phase 1 with tests and docs.",
|
|
}, {
|
|
userId: "local-board",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.status).toBe("answered");
|
|
expect(result.result).toEqual({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [
|
|
{ questionId: "scope", optionIds: ["phase-1"] },
|
|
{ questionId: "extras", optionIds: ["docs", "tests"] },
|
|
],
|
|
summaryMarkdown: "Phase 1 with tests and docs.",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(state.interactionUpdates).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(state.issueTouches).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("withdraws a pending interaction with attribution and rejects repeats", async () => {
|
|
const { issueThreadInteractionService } = await import("./issue-thread-interactions.js");
|
|
const interactionRow = {
|
|
id: "interaction-withdraw", companyId: "company-1", issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation", status: "pending", continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
sourceCommentId: null, sourceRunId: null, title: null, summary: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: "agent-1", createdByUserId: null, resolvedByAgentId: null, resolvedByUserId: null,
|
|
payload: { version: 1, prompt: "Proceed?" }, result: null, resolvedAt: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-07-25T10:00:00.000Z"), updatedAt: new Date("2026-07-25T10:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
const state = createFakeDb({ interactionRow });
|
|
const svc = issueThreadInteractionService(state.db as never);
|
|
const withdrawn = await svc.withdrawInteraction({ id: interactionRow.issueId, companyId: "company-1" }, interactionRow.id, { reason: "Replanning" }, { agentId: "agent-1" });
|
|
expect(withdrawn.status).toBe("cancelled");
|
|
expect(withdrawn.result).toEqual({ version: 1, outcome: "withdrawn", reason: "Replanning" });
|
|
expect(withdrawn.resolvedByAgentId).toBe("agent-1");
|
|
expect(state.toolActionRequestUpdates).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(state.toolActionRequestUpdates[0]).toMatchObject({ status: "cancelled", resolvedByAgentId: "agent-1" });
|
|
const resolvedState = createFakeDb({ interactionRow: { ...interactionRow, status: "accepted" } });
|
|
const resolvedSvc = issueThreadInteractionService(resolvedState.db as never);
|
|
await expect(resolvedSvc.withdrawInteraction(
|
|
{ id: interactionRow.issueId, companyId: "company-1" },
|
|
interactionRow.id,
|
|
{},
|
|
{ agentId: "agent-1" },
|
|
)).rejects.toMatchObject({ status: 409 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("refuses withdrawal when the linked tool action is already executing", async () => {
|
|
const { issueThreadInteractionService } = await import("./issue-thread-interactions.js");
|
|
const interactionRow = {
|
|
id: "interaction-executing", companyId: "company-1", issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation", status: "pending", continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
sourceCommentId: null, sourceRunId: null, title: null, summary: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: "agent-1", createdByUserId: null, resolvedByAgentId: null, resolvedByUserId: null,
|
|
payload: { version: 1, prompt: "Proceed?" }, result: null, resolvedAt: null,
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-07-25T10:00:00.000Z"), updatedAt: new Date("2026-07-25T10:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
const state = createFakeDb({ interactionRow, parentRows: [{ id: "action-request-1" }] });
|
|
const svc = issueThreadInteractionService(state.db as never);
|
|
await expect(svc.withdrawInteraction(
|
|
{ id: interactionRow.issueId, companyId: "company-1" },
|
|
interactionRow.id,
|
|
{},
|
|
{ agentId: "agent-1" },
|
|
)).rejects.toMatchObject({ status: 409 });
|
|
expect(state.interactionUpdates).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("expires pending interactions when the issue is terminal", async () => {
|
|
const { issueThreadInteractionService } = await import("./issue-thread-interactions.js");
|
|
const interactionRow = {
|
|
id: "interaction-close", companyId: "company-1", issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions", status: "pending", continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
sourceCommentId: null, sourceRunId: null, title: null, summary: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: "agent-1", createdByUserId: null, resolvedByAgentId: null, resolvedByUserId: null,
|
|
payload: { version: 1, questions: [{ id: "q", prompt: "Q?", selectionMode: "single", options: [{ id: "a", label: "A" }] }] },
|
|
result: null, resolvedAt: null, createdAt: new Date("2026-07-25T10:00:00.000Z"), updatedAt: new Date("2026-07-25T10:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
const state = createFakeDb({ interactionRow });
|
|
const svc = issueThreadInteractionService(state.db as never);
|
|
const expired = await svc.expirePendingInteractionsForTerminalIssue({ id: interactionRow.issueId, companyId: "company-1", status: "done" });
|
|
expect(expired).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(expired[0]?.status).toBe("expired");
|
|
expect(expired[0]?.result).toMatchObject({ version: 1, outcome: "issue_closed", answers: [] });
|
|
expect(state.toolActionRequestUpdates).toHaveLength(0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("expires the linked tool action request when a terminal issue closes a confirmation card", async () => {
|
|
const { issueThreadInteractionService } = await import("./issue-thread-interactions.js");
|
|
const interactionRow = {
|
|
id: "interaction-tool", companyId: "company-1", issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation", status: "pending", continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
sourceCommentId: null, sourceRunId: null, title: null, summary: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: "agent-1", createdByUserId: null, resolvedByAgentId: null, resolvedByUserId: null,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Run the parked tool call?",
|
|
toolAction: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
actionRequestId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
|
|
invocationId: "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444",
|
|
toolName: "deploy",
|
|
toolDisplayName: "Deploy",
|
|
connectionId: null,
|
|
applicationId: null,
|
|
appDisplayName: null,
|
|
risk: "write",
|
|
previewMarkdown: "Deploy the current build.",
|
|
argumentsSummaryJson: "{}",
|
|
argumentsHash: "hash-1",
|
|
expiresAt: "2026-07-25T11:00:00.000Z",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
result: null, resolvedAt: null, createdAt: new Date("2026-07-25T10:00:00.000Z"), updatedAt: new Date("2026-07-25T10:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
const state = createFakeDb({ interactionRow });
|
|
const svc = issueThreadInteractionService(state.db as never);
|
|
const expired = await svc.expirePendingInteractionsForTerminalIssue(
|
|
{ id: interactionRow.issueId, companyId: "company-1", status: "cancelled" },
|
|
{ userId: "local-board" },
|
|
);
|
|
expect(expired).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(expired[0]?.result).toMatchObject({ version: 1, outcome: "issue_closed" });
|
|
expect(state.toolActionRequestUpdates).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(state.toolActionRequestUpdates[0]).toMatchObject({ status: "expired", resolvedByUserId: "local-board" });
|
|
});
|
|
});
|