Files
PaperClipAI/tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-domains/runtime-built-in.test.ts
T
f4337bb5fb test(evals): land the chat catalog eval harness on master (#19614)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The chat-feature evals measure whether agents complete real chat
requests through the product
> - The chat catalog eval harness and its repairs live on the
`chat-eval/master-candidate` branch, not on master
> - Today's work made 139 of 242 chat evals pass in verified single-case
live runs. Each product fix landed on master as its own pull request
> - The eval-side changes (setups, graders, fault seams, evidence
capture) still exist only on the candidate
> - This pull request lands the harness on master. Master stays the
source of truth for product behavior
> - The benefit is one tree: evals run against master commits, and
product fixes reach the evals as soon as they merge

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19441, Refs #19599, Refs #20270, Refs #20334, Refs #20342, Refs
#20344, Refs #20354, Refs #20360, Refs #20373, Refs #20382, Refs #20409

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The chat catalog eval harness and the product it evaluates live on a
long-running branch outside master. Eval fixes do not reach master, so
master-based eval runs use old setups and graders.

**Subsystem affected**
`tests/runner-e2e` chat catalog harness, plus a small set of product
changes that exist only on the candidate.

**Proposed change**
Land the harness on master. Every product fix from this eval work
already merged to master as its own pull request. Conflicts keep
master's product behavior.

## What Changed

- Most of the diff (808 of 851 files) is under `tests/runner-e2e/`:
chat-catalog domains, scenarios, descriptors, the TestOps manifest,
private evidence tooling, and their tests.
- Graders now check saved state, setup literals and rendered or clicked
links. Many keyword and regex checks on free-form replies are removed.
Each changed grader has a bumped `oracleVersion` and calibration tests
(a valid reply, a reworded valid reply, and broken variants that must
fail).
- The shared link helper `hasLink` no longer treats a list link (for
example `/COM/issues?view=mine`) as a link to every task without a URL
key.
- Setup fixes build real state through supported product routes: routine
history, agent grants through the board grant route, budget holds with a
real cap, and a storage-layer archive fault for
`inbox-search.archive-partial-failure`.
- Browser boundary journeys (sign-in, chat-disabled, onboarding) now
write the standard pass evidence files.
- Retargeted cases, approved by the maintainer:
`agent-chat.chat-disabled` (Conference Room gate),
`agents.restore-instructions` (no saved instruction history),
`access.manage-membership` (member permission edits stay board-only).
- The private evidence trusted files (`manual-private-handoff.ts`,
`manual-private-retention.ts`, `manual-private-report-assets.ts`) are
byte-identical to master.
- Product files outside `tests/` (43 files, +1,328 −49) carry
candidate-only changes that master does not yet have. Most are tests.
The main code changes are in `request-human-input.ts`,
`heartbeat-run-summary.ts`, `native-completion-feedback.ts`,
`native-run-finalizer.ts`, `openapi.ts`, `secrets.ts` and
`IssueChatLongThreadPerf.tsx`.

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run chat-catalog-domains chat-catalog-contract.test.ts
chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts unit-launcher.test.mjs
--testTimeout=180000` in `tests/runner-e2e`: 269 files pass, 3,550 tests
pass.
- `node --test chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs`: 10 pass.
- `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`:
no change.
- `tsc` for `server` and `tests/runner-e2e`: clean.
- Live single-case verification: 139 of 242 cases passed on paid runs,
and a person read the saved evidence for each. These are single-case
runs, not one full-cohort run.

## Risks

- Large diff. Most of it is test-only, but the 43 non-test files change
product code paths. Review those files first.
- Some graders are now less strict on reply wording. A person must read
replies for meaning on those cases.
- 42 cases need disposable outside accounts (Notion, Slack, GitHub,
Daytona and others) and stay blocked. `access.invite-teammate` stays
failing until local agent isolation lands, because the runner's durable
state keeps a live invite token.
- The paid workflow compares the trusted private-evidence files with
master. They are unchanged, so this risk is low.

## Model Used

Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code
execution, in Claude Code. Subagents used the same model.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-10 08:02:11 -06:00

55 lines
4.3 KiB
TypeScript

import { createHash } from "node:crypto";
import { it, expect } from "vitest";
import { gradeBuiltInConfiguration } from "./runtime-built-in.js";
const ORIGINAL = "You are Summarizer, a built-in reporting agent.\n\n## Core responsibilities\n\n- Read the scope.\n- Open with 1-3 actions.\n- Follow with a paragraph or two of status prose.\n- Keep summaries short.";
const TUNED = ORIGINAL.replace("a paragraph or two of status prose", "one paragraph of status prose") + "\n\n## Length budget\n\n- Target 100 words; hard ceiling 150.";
const hash = (content: string) => createHash("sha256").update(content).digest("hex");
function valid() {
const builtIn = { definition: { key: "summarizer" }, agentId: "summarizer" };
const task = { id: "history", title: "Summary history", companyId: "company", assigneeAgentId: "summarizer", status: "backlog" };
// Reads report a content token stamped with the reader, and history is empty (design change 14420).
const token = { id: "token", companyId: "company", agentId: "summarizer", actorAgentId: null, sourceRunId: null, source: "api" };
return { scenarioId: "agents.configure-required-agent", origin: "http://fixture.invalid", companyId: "company", leadId: "ceo",
state: { builtInBefore: builtIn, builtInAfter: { ...builtIn }, originalInstruction: { path: "AGENTS.md", content: ORIGINAL, revision: token }, agentCountBefore: 2, historicalTask: task },
instruction: { path: "AGENTS.md", content: TUNED, revision: { ...token, id: "token-2" } },
instructionHistory: { revisions: [] as unknown[] },
agents: [{ id: "ceo", name: "CEO", companyId: "company" }, { id: "summarizer", name: "Summarizer", companyId: "company" }], tasks: [task],
links: ["/RUN/agents/summarizer"], reply: "Updated the [Summarizer](/RUN/agents/summarizer) instructions with a hard length budget.",
activity: [{ id: "write", companyId: "company", action: "agent.files_updated", entityType: "agent", entityId: "summarizer", actorType: "agent", actorId: "ceo",
agentId: "ceo", runId: "run", details: { path: "AGENTS.md", source: "api", created: false, contentHash: hash(TUNED) } }],
runs: [{ id: "run", companyId: "company", agentId: "ceo" }], humanQueries: [] };
}
const grade = (o: unknown) => gradeBuiltInConfiguration(o).passed;
it("accepts the run's saved, attributed tuning of the existing summarizer", () => expect(grade(valid())).toBe(true));
it("accepts a reworded reply that names the summarizer without a link", () => {
const o = valid(); o.links = []; o.reply = "Done: Summarizer now has a tighter word ceiling, effective on its next run."; expect(grade(o)).toBe(true);
});
it("accepts a saved write through the dedicated instruction tool", () => {
const o = valid(); o.activity[0].details.source = "tool"; expect(grade(o)).toBe(true);
});
it("rejects missing built-in evidence", () => expect(grade(undefined)).toBe(false));
it("rejects replacing the protected identity with an ordinary hire", () => {
const o = valid(); o.state.builtInAfter.agentId = "replacement"; expect(grade(o)).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects an extra ordinary hire", () => {
const o = valid(); o.agents.push({ id: "hire", name: "Short Summarizer", companyId: "company" }); expect(grade(o)).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects a reply that claims a change the product never saved", () => {
const o = valid(); o.instruction.content = ORIGINAL; expect(grade(o)).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects instructions changed by someone other than the chat run", () => {
const o = valid(); Object.assign(o.activity[0], { actorType: "user", actorId: "local-board", agentId: null, runId: null }); expect(grade(o)).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects an audit row for different bytes than the product now serves", () => {
const o = valid(); o.activity[0].details.contentHash = hash(`${TUNED}\nlater edit`); expect(grade(o)).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects wholesale replacement of the bundled summarizer instructions", () => {
const o = valid(); o.instruction.content = "Write two-sentence updates."; o.activity[0].details.contentHash = hash(o.instruction.content); expect(grade(o)).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects erasing the old attributed task", () => {
const o = valid(); o.tasks = []; expect(grade(o)).toBe(false);
});
it("rejects a reply that does not identify the configured agent", () => {
const o = valid(); o.links = []; o.reply = "Done."; expect(grade(o)).toBe(false);
});