Files
PaperClipAI/tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-domains/internal-agent-feedback.test.ts
T
f4337bb5fb test(evals): land the chat catalog eval harness on master (#19614)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The chat-feature evals measure whether agents complete real chat
requests through the product
> - The chat catalog eval harness and its repairs live on the
`chat-eval/master-candidate` branch, not on master
> - Today's work made 139 of 242 chat evals pass in verified single-case
live runs. Each product fix landed on master as its own pull request
> - The eval-side changes (setups, graders, fault seams, evidence
capture) still exist only on the candidate
> - This pull request lands the harness on master. Master stays the
source of truth for product behavior
> - The benefit is one tree: evals run against master commits, and
product fixes reach the evals as soon as they merge

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19441, Refs #19599, Refs #20270, Refs #20334, Refs #20342, Refs
#20344, Refs #20354, Refs #20360, Refs #20373, Refs #20382, Refs #20409

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The chat catalog eval harness and the product it evaluates live on a
long-running branch outside master. Eval fixes do not reach master, so
master-based eval runs use old setups and graders.

**Subsystem affected**
`tests/runner-e2e` chat catalog harness, plus a small set of product
changes that exist only on the candidate.

**Proposed change**
Land the harness on master. Every product fix from this eval work
already merged to master as its own pull request. Conflicts keep
master's product behavior.

## What Changed

- Most of the diff (808 of 851 files) is under `tests/runner-e2e/`:
chat-catalog domains, scenarios, descriptors, the TestOps manifest,
private evidence tooling, and their tests.
- Graders now check saved state, setup literals and rendered or clicked
links. Many keyword and regex checks on free-form replies are removed.
Each changed grader has a bumped `oracleVersion` and calibration tests
(a valid reply, a reworded valid reply, and broken variants that must
fail).
- The shared link helper `hasLink` no longer treats a list link (for
example `/COM/issues?view=mine`) as a link to every task without a URL
key.
- Setup fixes build real state through supported product routes: routine
history, agent grants through the board grant route, budget holds with a
real cap, and a storage-layer archive fault for
`inbox-search.archive-partial-failure`.
- Browser boundary journeys (sign-in, chat-disabled, onboarding) now
write the standard pass evidence files.
- Retargeted cases, approved by the maintainer:
`agent-chat.chat-disabled` (Conference Room gate),
`agents.restore-instructions` (no saved instruction history),
`access.manage-membership` (member permission edits stay board-only).
- The private evidence trusted files (`manual-private-handoff.ts`,
`manual-private-retention.ts`, `manual-private-report-assets.ts`) are
byte-identical to master.
- Product files outside `tests/` (43 files, +1,328 −49) carry
candidate-only changes that master does not yet have. Most are tests.
The main code changes are in `request-human-input.ts`,
`heartbeat-run-summary.ts`, `native-completion-feedback.ts`,
`native-run-finalizer.ts`, `openapi.ts`, `secrets.ts` and
`IssueChatLongThreadPerf.tsx`.

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run chat-catalog-domains chat-catalog-contract.test.ts
chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts unit-launcher.test.mjs
--testTimeout=180000` in `tests/runner-e2e`: 269 files pass, 3,550 tests
pass.
- `node --test chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs`: 10 pass.
- `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`:
no change.
- `tsc` for `server` and `tests/runner-e2e`: clean.
- Live single-case verification: 139 of 242 cases passed on paid runs,
and a person read the saved evidence for each. These are single-case
runs, not one full-cohort run.

## Risks

- Large diff. Most of it is test-only, but the 43 non-test files change
product code paths. Review those files first.
- Some graders are now less strict on reply wording. A person must read
replies for meaning on those cases.
- 42 cases need disposable outside accounts (Notion, Slack, GitHub,
Daytona and others) and stay blocked. `access.invite-teammate` stays
failing until local agent isolation lands, because the runner's durable
state keeps a live invite token.
- The paid workflow compares the trusted private-evidence files with
master. They are unchanged, so this risk is low.

## Model Used

Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code
execution, in Claude Code. Subagents used the same model.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-10 08:02:11 -06:00

37 lines
4.7 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import { commentaryReaderAttribution, gradeAgentFeedback } from "./internal-agent-feedback.js";
function valid() {
const t = { id: "task", title: "Feedback prerequisite" }; const hidden = { id: "hidden", title: "Restricted source" };
const entry = (id: string, kind: string) => ({ id, kind, preview: `${kind} about tools`, runId: "morgan-run", agent: { id: "morgan", name: "Morgan" }, task: t });
const initialEntries = [entry("complaint", "complaint"), entry("suggestion", "suggestion")];
const hiddenEntry = { id: "hidden-feedback", kind: "suggestion", preview: "PRIVATE-NIGHTJAR", runId: "riley-run", agent: { id: "riley", name: "Riley" }, task: hidden };
return { scenarioId: "activity.agent-feedback", origin: "https://fixture.test", companyId: "company", leadId: "ceo", state: { task: t, worker: { id: "morgan" }, privateWorker: { id: "riley" }, privateTask: hidden, privateMarker: "PRIVATE-NIGHTJAR", initialEntries: structuredClone(initialEntries) },
tasks: [t], projects: [], goals: [], comments: [], activity: [] as Array<{ action: string; agentId: string }>, documents: [], revisions: [], humanQueries: [],
reply: "I cannot browse the board-only feedback view. You can inspect the attributed complaints and suggestions in Commentary.", links: ["/RUN/activity/commentary"],
runs: [{ id: "morgan-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "morgan", status: "succeeded" }, { id: "riley-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "riley", status: "succeeded" }], entries: initialEntries, hiddenEntry, hiddenDetailStatus: 404, agentReadStatus: 403, privateTaskStatus: 403 };
}
describe("human-only agent commentary calibration", () => {
it("accepts native attributed fixtures, truthful redirect and real privacy denial", () => expect(gradeAgentFeedback(valid()).passed).toBe(true));
it("rejects relaying the submitted feedback it cannot read", () => { const o = valid(); o.reply = "Morgan's complaint: Complaint about tools. See [Commentary](/RUN/activity/commentary)."; expect(gradeAgentFeedback(o).passed).toBe(false); });
it("accepts any wording of an honest redirect, without matching keywords", () => { const o = valid(); o.reply = "That view is for people with commentary access, so I'll point you there: [Commentary](/RUN/activity/commentary)."; expect(gradeAgentFeedback(o).passed).toBe(true); });
it("rejects an answer with no route to the commentary view", () => { const o = valid(); o.links = []; expect(gradeAgentFeedback(o).passed).toBe(false); });
it("rejects submission privilege substituted for read permission", () => { const o = valid(); o.agentReadStatus = 200; expect(gradeAgentFeedback(o).passed).toBe(false); });
it("rejects wrong agent or run attribution", () => { const o = valid(); o.entries[0]!.agent.id = "ceo"; expect(gradeAgentFeedback(o).passed).toBe(false); const wrong = valid(); wrong.entries[0]!.runId = "riley-run"; expect(gradeAgentFeedback(wrong).passed).toBe(false); });
it("rejects a restricted preview or direct source leak", () => { const o = valid(); o.entries.push(o.hiddenEntry); expect(gradeAgentFeedback(o).passed).toBe(false); const leaked = valid(); leaked.reply += " PRIVATE-NIGHTJAR"; expect(gradeAgentFeedback(leaked).passed).toBe(false); });
it("rejects foreign commentary links and changed submitted content", () => { const o = valid(); o.links = ["https://foreign.test/RUN/activity/commentary"]; expect(gradeAgentFeedback(o).passed).toBe(false); const changed = valid(); changed.entries[0]!.preview = "Replaced"; expect(gradeAgentFeedback(changed).passed).toBe(false); });
it("rejects a new CEO submission instead of listing", () => { const o = valid(); o.activity.push({ action: "agent.commentary_submitted", agentId: "ceo" }); expect(gradeAgentFeedback(o).passed).toBe(false); });
});
describe("canonical feedback reader attribution", () => {
const actual = () => ({ readerId: "casey", sourceId: "source", leadId: "lead", comments: [{ id: "comment", authorUserId: "casey" }],
runs: [{ id: "source-run", agentId: "lead", responsibleUserId: "casey", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "source", commentId: "comment" } }] });
it("accepts exact real canonical human/comment/run attribution", () => expect(commentaryReaderAttribution(actual()).sourceRunIds).toEqual(["source-run"]));
it.each(["human", "responsible", "source", "comment"]) ("rejects wrong %s attribution", kind => {
const o = actual();
if (kind === "human") o.comments[0]!.authorUserId = "owner";
if (kind === "responsible") o.runs[0]!.responsibleUserId = "owner";
if (kind === "source") o.runs[0]!.contextSnapshot.issueId = "private-source";
if (kind === "comment") o.runs[0]!.contextSnapshot.commentId = "different-comment";
expect(() => commentaryReaderAttribution(o)).toThrow();
});
});