Files
PaperClipAI/tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-domains/integrator-routine-invocation.ts
T
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 8e332ccb5e fix(evals): name stale SDK pins and fix four chat-eval harness defects (#20579)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The chat feature eval catalog (`tests/runner-e2e`) runs real chat
journeys against a real server and grades the saved state, the run's
tool events and the rendered reply
> - The full-cohort run on master `f4337bb5fb` had 12 failures that come
from the harness, not from the product or the model
> - Six plugin and secrets cells stopped in 7–9 s, before the server
started, because the SDK public source pins were stale
> - Four more cells failed on harness timing, a first-visit prompt, or a
read receipt that ignored a dedicated tool
> - This pull request fixes those four harness defects and adds a cheap
guard that names stale SDK pins
> - The benefit is that these cells now report on the product and the
model again

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19614, #20550, #20453, #20417, #20483

**What happened**

On master `f4337bb5fb`, these chat eval cells failed for harness
reasons:

- `plugins.configure-plugin`, `plugins.disable-plugin`,
`plugins.install-plugin`, `plugins.use-plugin-tool`,
`routines.plugin-managed-routine` and `secrets.least-scope-delivery`
stopped before the server started. The source SDK privacy scan refused,
because `tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.json` did not match
`packages/shared/src`. #20550 and #20362 already resynced the pins on
master. The pins are current at `ce1ee9e89f`.
- `agent-chat.track-delegated-work` and
`navigation-preferences.edit-profile`: the reply was correct and had the
right link. The case read the rendered links immediately after the runs
settled, before the reply rendered, so it recorded no links.
- `inbox-search.archive-done` and `inbox-search.restore-archive`: setup
completes five tasks, so the GitHub star prompt from #20453 opened over
the chat and blocked the composer.
- `status-cards.explain-card`: the follow-up run read the deleted source
with `get_task` and received a 404. The reply said so. `apiReadStatuses`
counted only `call_api` reads, so the grader recorded no unavailable
read.

Why the existing pin check did not stop the drift: `ci / Runner support
suite` runs the source SDK tests and is part of the required `ci /
verify`. On #19614 it passed at 03:43Z on a merge ref from before #20417
(06:12Z) and #20483 (08:14Z). #19614 merged at 14:02Z without a new CI
run on current master. After that, the suite failed on every PR until
#20550. So the check exists and fires; the gap was a stale green result,
and the failure message was opaque (`SDK public source proof
unavailable`).

**Expected behavior**

- A change to a pinned SDK input without a pin refresh fails with the
changed files and the command that fixes it.
- Cases read rendered links only after the saved reply renders.
- The eval browser is a returning user's browser that has already seen
the star prompt. The product does not change.
- A dedicated task read tool (`get_task`, `list_task_documents`,
`read_task_document`, also when namespaced) counts as a read of the
record it names, with the status its receipt reports.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Run `chat-features.runner-opencode.local.<case>` for one of the cases
above on master `f4337bb5fb`.
2. Read `result.json` and `snapshots/chat-catalog-observation.json` in
the evidence bundle.
3. See the failures described above.

## What Changed

- `tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs`: add
`staleSdkPublicInputs(root)`. It compares the registry with `git ls-tree
HEAD` for every pinned input (the roots and build inputs that the pins
file lists), and returns each changed, unpinned or removed file.
- `tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.test.mjs`: a test fails
when the committed pins do not match the committed tree. The message
names the files and gives the `--write` command. The Runner support
suite runs it for every `packages/**` change. A synthetic test covers
changed, unpinned and removed inputs.
- `tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-domains/runtime-handoffs.ts` and
`identity-profile.ts`: call the existing `waitForRenderedReply` before
they read rendered links.
- `tests/runner-e2e/chat-returning-browser.ts` (new) and
`chat-catalog-flow.ts`: inside the flow's failure boundary, before
setup, mark `paperclip.github-star-prompt.seen` in the eval browser. An
init script covers later documents of the app origin, and the open page
is marked directly. A test checks that the key equals
`STAR_PROMPT_SEEN_KEY` in `ui/src/components/GitHubStarPrompt.tsx`.
- `tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-domains/api-read-receipts.ts`: bind
dedicated task read tools by the digest of the `call_api` input that the
server builds for them (`taskBridgeApiRequest`). The result must carry
the same `apiOperationId`. Other tools, other records, mismatched
receipts and unpaired results do not count.
- Bump `oracleVersion` in code and descriptor for every case that uses
`api-read-receipts.ts` (shared grader change) and for
`navigation-preferences.edit-profile`. Add
`internal-comment-reference.ts` to the source files of the two cases
that now import it.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts`
(whole config): 11301 passed; 1 local-only failure in
`controller-replacement-smoke.test.ts` (server spawn, no changed
imports).
- `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts
--testTimeout=180000 tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-domains
tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-contract.test.ts
tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts
tests/runner-e2e/chat-returning-browser.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts
source-sdk`
- `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs $(git rev-parse
HEAD) --check` reports `changed: false`.
- Red checks: with the `f4337bb5fb` registry, the new pin test fails and
names 15 inputs. Without the new waits, the two rendered-reply tests
fail. A regrade of the retained `explain-card` run events now gives the
follow-up run `unavailable: true, live: false` and the first run `live:
true`.
- Paid runs of the affected cells
(`chat-features.runner-opencode.local.*`):
- Run 42852698879 (head `d54c04d5f0`): `track-delegated-work`,
`restore-archive`, `explain-card`, `configure-plugin` and
`plugin-managed-routine` pass. I read each reply and saved state.
`track-delegated-work` now records the rendered `/COM/issues/COM-2`
link. `explain-card` records `laterUnavailable: true, laterLive: false`
from the follow-up `get_task` 404.
- `plugins.install-plugin` now starts its server (the pin refusal is
gone). It fails a later grading check, `truthful-installation-handoff`:
the reply sends the person to the plugin settings page but does not name
the package. This is outside this PR.
- `inbox-search.archive-done`: the star prompt no longer blocks the
composer, and the query is sent. The agent then archives the 501 Done
tasks one at a time (about 2 s each, 57 in the 240 s window), because
only the per-task archive route exists. This is outside this PR.
- `navigation-preferences.edit-profile` did not start in that run (the
AWS credentials step timed out). Run 42857020103 (head `2f0b80aa84`):
pass. The agent write gets 401, the reply links
`/COM/company/settings/instance/profile`, and the person follows the
rendered link and saves the name.

## Risks

- Low risk. Test harness only; no product code changes.
- The receipt change counts more reads as record reads. It only adds
dedicated reads bound to the exact record id and operation, so a grader
that needs a read can pass on a genuine `get_task` read. The affected
cases have new oracle versions.
- The star prompt is not tested by any chat catalog case. Product e2e
tests for the prompt do not use this flow.

## Model Used

- Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with
tool use (shell, file editing, test execution).

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-10 11:01:44 -06:00

138 lines
13 KiB
TypeScript

import { chatCatalogNativePhaseDeadline, chatCatalogNativePhaseIsTimely, chatCatalogNativePhaseRemainingBudget } from "../chat-catalog-contract.js";
import { createRoutineSchema } from "../../../packages/shared/src/validators/routine.js";
import type { RoutineDetail, RoutineRunSummary } from "../../../packages/shared/src/types/routine.js";
import type { ChatCatalogContext } from "../chat-catalog-contract.js";
import { pollUntil } from "../api.js";
import { collectRunEvents } from "../run-observations.js";
import { apiReadDigests, recordParams, type ApiRead } from "./api-read-receipts.js";
import { checks, hasLink, observation, project, type Entity, type InternalObservation } from "./internal-support.js";
import { integratorDefinition, observeInternal, inspectResult, resultHref } from "./integrator-support.js";
/**
* One completed product tool execution, as recorded in the run's durable event stream. A call_api
* result's body is redacted before saving, so it is kept as its input digest, operation and status.
*/
export interface InvocationToolRead { runId: string; name: string; at: string; output: string; apiRead?: { inputSha256: string; operationId: string; ok: boolean; status: number } }
interface InvocationObservation extends InternalObservation { routine: RoutineDetail; invocations: RoutineRunSummary[]; outputComments: Entity[]; toolReads?: InvocationToolRead[] }
async function invocationToolReads(ctx: ChatCatalogContext, runs: InternalObservation["runs"]): Promise<InvocationToolRead[]> {
const reads: InvocationToolRead[] = [];
for (const run of runs) {
const events = await collectRunEvents<{ seq?: number; createdAt?: string; payload?: Record<string, unknown> | null }>((afterSeq, limit) =>
ctx.input.api.getRunObservation(`/api/heartbeat-runs/${run.id}/events?afterSeq=${afterSeq}&limit=${limit}`));
const uses = new Map<string, { inputSha256: string; operationId: string }>();
for (const event of events) {
const prp = event.payload?.prpEvent as { eventType?: string; payload?: { name?: unknown; status?: unknown; output?: unknown; item?: Record<string, any> } } | undefined;
const item = prp?.payload?.item;
if (item?.type === "tool_use" && item.name === "call_api" && item.input?.apiPayloadRedacted === true && typeof item.input.operationId === "string")
uses.set(String(item.id), { inputSha256: String(item.input.apiPayloadSha256), operationId: item.input.operationId });
const use = item?.type === "tool_result" ? uses.get(String(item.tool_use_id)) : undefined;
if (use && item?.result?.apiOperationId === use.operationId && typeof item.result.status === "number")
reads.push({ runId: run.id, name: "call_api", at: event.createdAt ?? "", output: "", apiRead: { ...use, ok: item.result.ok === true, status: item.result.status } });
if (prp?.eventType !== "tool.execution.completed" || prp.payload?.status !== "completed" || typeof prp.payload.name !== "string") continue;
const output = typeof prp.payload.output === "string" ? prp.payload.output : JSON.stringify(prp.payload.output ?? "");
reads.push({ runId: run.id, name: prp.payload.name, at: event.createdAt ?? "", output: output.slice(0, 8192) });
}
}
return reads;
}
async function observeInvocation(ctx: ChatCatalogContext, state: Record<string, unknown>, withToolReads = false): Promise<InvocationObservation> {
const base = await observeInternal(ctx, state); const id = (state.routine as RoutineDetail).id;
const invocations = await ctx.input.api.get<RoutineRunSummary[]>(`/api/routines/${id}/runs`);
return { ...base, routine: await ctx.input.api.get<RoutineDetail>(`/api/routines/${id}`), invocations,
outputComments: invocations[0]?.linkedIssueId ? await ctx.input.api.get<Entity[]>(`/api/issues/${invocations[0].linkedIssueId}/comments?order=asc`) : [],
...(withToolReads ? { toolReads: await invocationToolReads(ctx, base.runs) } : {}) };
}
function invocationObservation(value: unknown): InvocationObservation | undefined {
const o = value as InvocationObservation;
return observation(value) && !!o.routine && Array.isArray(o.invocations) && Array.isArray(o.outputComments) ? o : undefined;
}
/** Narrow contradiction guard for the first answer only: a sentence that states the summary,
* run or task as already done, without negation or a future/conditional frame. It never makes
* a valid answer depend on particular wording; it only refuses an explicit premature claim. */
function prematureCompletionClaim(reply: string) {
return reply.split(/(?<=[.!?])\s+|\n+/).some(sentence =>
/\b(?:summary|execution|task|run)\b[^.!?\n]{0,50}\b(?:completed|finished|succeeded|is ready|is done)\b/i.test(sentence)
&& !/\bnot\b|n't\b|\b(?:pending|waiting|will|once|when|after|until|should|expected|queued|started|in progress)\b/i.test(sentence));
}
/** The run read a product record naming `id` at or after `since`: an unredacted tool output exposing the
* record, or a successful call_api read whose saved input digest names it (the body itself is redacted). */
function readRecordAfter(o: InvocationObservation, runId: string | undefined, id: string | undefined, since: string | null | undefined, reads: readonly ApiRead[]) {
const digests = apiReadDigests(reads);
return !!runId && !!id && (o.toolReads ?? []).some(row => row.runId === runId
&& (row.output.includes(id) || !!row.apiRead && row.apiRead.ok && row.apiRead.status >= 200 && row.apiRead.status < 300 && digests.has(row.apiRead.inputSha256))
&& (!since || Date.parse(row.at) >= Date.parse(since)));
}
export function gradeIntegratorRoutineInvocation(value: unknown) {
const c = checks(); const o = invocationObservation(value);
c.add("actual-invocation-and-output", !!o && Array.isArray(o.toolReads), "Requires public invocation, task, native output, tool-read and original response evidence.");
if (!o) return c.result();
const invocation = o.invocations[0]; const task = o.tasks.find(row => row.id === invocation?.linkedIssueId);
const first = invocationObservation(o.state.firstInvocation);
const firstInvocation = first?.invocations[0];
const projectId = (o.state.project as Entity | undefined)?.id;
c.add("one-manual-launch-input", o.invocations.length === 1 && invocation?.source === "manual" && invocation.routineId === o.routine.id
&& invocation.triggerPayload?.variables != null && (invocation.triggerPayload.variables as Record<string, unknown>).projectName === "Launch"
&& !!task && task.projectId === projectId && task.assigneeAgentId === o.leadId,
"Exactly one manual invocation retains the supplied project-name input and creates the intended owned Launch task.");
c.add("same-delivery-is-not-new-intent", !!firstInvocation?.idempotencyKey && o.state.replayRunId === invocation?.id
&& o.state.replayIssueId === task?.id && firstInvocation.id === invocation?.id && o.invocations.length === 1,
"Replaying the committed public invocation with its original key retains the same invocation and task IDs.");
c.add("accepted-versus-completed-at-first-reply", !!first && first.invocations.length === 1 && first.reply.trim().length > 0
&& (!prematureCompletionClaim(first.reply) || firstInvocation?.status === "completed" && first.tasks.some(row => row.id === firstInvocation.linkedIssueId && row.status === "done")),
"The first answer cannot claim a completed summary before the saved invocation and task actually complete.");
const outputRun = o.runs.find(run => run.contextSnapshot?.issueId === task?.id && run.agentId === o.leadId && run.status === "succeeded" && run.runtimeMode === "native");
const output = o.outputComments.filter(row => row.authorAgentId === o.leadId && row.createdByRunId === outputRun?.id && (row.body ?? "").trim().length > 0);
c.add("actual-completed-summary", !!task && invocation?.status === "completed" && task.status === "done" && !!outputRun && output.length > 0
&& readRecordAfter(o, outputRun?.id, projectId, undefined, [{ operationId: "GET /api/projects/{id}", pathParams: recordParams("id", projectId) }]),
"The routine's own native task run read the actual Launch project, saved its summary on the task and completed normally.");
// The follow-up answer comes from a chat run that did not exist at the first reply and is not the routine's own task run.
const followUp = o.runs.find(run => run.agentId === o.leadId && run.status === "succeeded" && run.contextSnapshot?.issueId !== task?.id
&& !!first && !first.runs.some(row => row.id === run.id));
const later = first && o.reply.startsWith(first.reply) ? o.reply.slice(first.reply.length).trim() : "";
c.add("later-actual-result-and-task-link", !!task && hasLink(o, "issues", task) && later.length > 0 && !!followUp
&& readRecordAfter(o, followUp?.id, task.id, invocation?.completedAt ? new Date(invocation.completedAt).toISOString() : undefined,
["GET /api/issues/{id}", "GET /api/issues/{id}/comments"].map(operationId => ({ operationId, pathParams: recordParams("id", task.id, task.identifier), paged: true, queries: [{ order: "asc" }, { order: "desc" }] }))),
"The explicit later request is answered by a new chat run that read the completed result task after the invocation finished, and the conversation links that task.");
return c.result();
}
/** Validate prerequisite input against the same supported public creation schema. */
export function launchSummaryRoutineInput(projectId: string, assigneeAgentId: string) {
return createRoutineSchema.parse({ title: "Launch summary", projectId, assigneeAgentId,
description: "Summarize the actual {{projectName}} project in one saved task comment, including its actual payment approval state. Link the project and mark this summary task done. Do not change project records or create follow-up tasks.",
variables: [{ name: "projectName", type: "text", required: true }] });
}
export const integratorRoutineInvocationCases = [integratorDefinition("routines", "routines.run-now", async ctx => {
const p = await project(ctx, "Launch", { description: "Synthetic Launch project. Payment approval is pending; no approval has been received." });
const routine = await ctx.input.api.post<RoutineDetail>(`/api/companies/${ctx.input.fixtures.company.id}/routines`, launchSummaryRoutineInput(p.id, ctx.input.fixtures.agent.id));
return { project: p, routine };
}, (ctx, state) => observeInvocation(ctx, state, true), gradeIntegratorRoutineInvocation, async (ctx, _state, value) => {
const o = invocationObservation(value); const task = o?.tasks.find(row => row.id === o.invocations[0]?.linkedIssueId);
if (!o || !task) throw new Error("Missing actual routine result task");
await inspectResult(ctx, `/${ctx.input.fixtures.company.issuePrefix}/issues/${task.identifier ?? task.id}`, task.title!, resultHref(o, task.identifier ?? task.id, "issues") ?? resultHref(o, task.id, "issues"));
}, {
oracleVersion: "paperclip.chat-catalog.integrator.routine-invocation.v4",
sourceFiles: ["chat-catalog-domains/integrator-routine-invocation.ts", "chat-catalog-domains/api-read-receipts.ts", "run-observations.ts", "chat-catalog-domains/integrator-support.ts", "chat-catalog-domains/internal-support.ts", "chat-scenarios/routines.yaml"],
expectedRunCount: 3, expectedHumanMessageCount: 2, attemptTimeoutMs: 720_000,
async act(ctx, state) {
const first = await pollUntil({ label: "routine invocation first actual reply", deadlineAt: chatCatalogNativePhaseDeadline(ctx, Date.now() + 180_000), intervalMs: 1000,
load: () => observeInvocation(ctx, state), accept: o => chatCatalogNativePhaseIsTimely(ctx) && (o.invocations.length === 1 && o.runs.some(row => row.agentId === o.leadId && row.contextSnapshot?.issueId === ctx.issue()?.id && row.status === "succeeded") && ctx.issue()?.conversationState === "waiting"),
reject: o => o.invocations.length > 1 ? "Initial request created duplicate routine invocations" : undefined });
state.firstInvocation = { ...first, state: structuredClone(state) };
const invocation = first.invocations[0]!;
if (!invocation.idempotencyKey || !invocation.linkedIssueId) throw new Error("Committed routine invocation has no replayable public identity");
// Independent transport-delivery probe of the existing committed request;
// it must not supply another user intent or admit another execution.
const replay = await ctx.input.api.post<RoutineRunSummary>(`/api/routines/${invocation.routineId}/run`, {
source: invocation.source, triggerId: invocation.triggerId, idempotencyKey: invocation.idempotencyKey,
payload: invocation.triggerPayload, variables: invocation.triggerPayload?.variables,
});
state.replayRunId = replay.id; state.replayIssueId = replay.linkedIssueId;
await ctx.input.evidence("chat-routine-invocation-first-response.json", state.firstInvocation);
await pollUntil({ label: "real routine execution completed", deadlineAt: Date.now() + 240_000, intervalMs: 1000,
load: () => observeInvocation(ctx, state), accept: o => o.invocations.length === 1 && o.invocations[0]?.status === "completed" && o.runs.length === 2 && o.runs.every(run => run.status === "succeeded"),
reject: o => o.invocations.length > 1 || o.runs.length > 2 ? "Delivery replay admitted unexpected additional work" : undefined });
const { sendChatMessage } = await import("../chat-flow.js");
await sendChatMessage(ctx.input.page, "What was the actual result of that summary run?", chatCatalogNativePhaseRemainingBudget(ctx));
},
})];