mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-14 17:22:00 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The chat feature eval catalog (`tests/runner-e2e`) runs real chat journeys against a real server and grades the saved state, the run's tool events and the rendered reply > - The full-cohort run on master `f4337bb5fb` had 12 failures that come from the harness, not from the product or the model > - Six plugin and secrets cells stopped in 7–9 s, before the server started, because the SDK public source pins were stale > - Four more cells failed on harness timing, a first-visit prompt, or a read receipt that ignored a dedicated tool > - This pull request fixes those four harness defects and adds a cheap guard that names stale SDK pins > - The benefit is that these cells now report on the product and the model again ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19614, #20550, #20453, #20417, #20483 **What happened** On master `f4337bb5fb`, these chat eval cells failed for harness reasons: - `plugins.configure-plugin`, `plugins.disable-plugin`, `plugins.install-plugin`, `plugins.use-plugin-tool`, `routines.plugin-managed-routine` and `secrets.least-scope-delivery` stopped before the server started. The source SDK privacy scan refused, because `tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.json` did not match `packages/shared/src`. #20550 and #20362 already resynced the pins on master. The pins are current at `ce1ee9e89f`. - `agent-chat.track-delegated-work` and `navigation-preferences.edit-profile`: the reply was correct and had the right link. The case read the rendered links immediately after the runs settled, before the reply rendered, so it recorded no links. - `inbox-search.archive-done` and `inbox-search.restore-archive`: setup completes five tasks, so the GitHub star prompt from #20453 opened over the chat and blocked the composer. - `status-cards.explain-card`: the follow-up run read the deleted source with `get_task` and received a 404. The reply said so. `apiReadStatuses` counted only `call_api` reads, so the grader recorded no unavailable read. Why the existing pin check did not stop the drift: `ci / Runner support suite` runs the source SDK tests and is part of the required `ci / verify`. On #19614 it passed at 03:43Z on a merge ref from before #20417 (06:12Z) and #20483 (08:14Z). #19614 merged at 14:02Z without a new CI run on current master. After that, the suite failed on every PR until #20550. So the check exists and fires; the gap was a stale green result, and the failure message was opaque (`SDK public source proof unavailable`). **Expected behavior** - A change to a pinned SDK input without a pin refresh fails with the changed files and the command that fixes it. - Cases read rendered links only after the saved reply renders. - The eval browser is a returning user's browser that has already seen the star prompt. The product does not change. - A dedicated task read tool (`get_task`, `list_task_documents`, `read_task_document`, also when namespaced) counts as a read of the record it names, with the status its receipt reports. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run `chat-features.runner-opencode.local.<case>` for one of the cases above on master `f4337bb5fb`. 2. Read `result.json` and `snapshots/chat-catalog-observation.json` in the evidence bundle. 3. See the failures described above. ## What Changed - `tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs`: add `staleSdkPublicInputs(root)`. It compares the registry with `git ls-tree HEAD` for every pinned input (the roots and build inputs that the pins file lists), and returns each changed, unpinned or removed file. - `tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.test.mjs`: a test fails when the committed pins do not match the committed tree. The message names the files and gives the `--write` command. The Runner support suite runs it for every `packages/**` change. A synthetic test covers changed, unpinned and removed inputs. - `tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-domains/runtime-handoffs.ts` and `identity-profile.ts`: call the existing `waitForRenderedReply` before they read rendered links. - `tests/runner-e2e/chat-returning-browser.ts` (new) and `chat-catalog-flow.ts`: inside the flow's failure boundary, before setup, mark `paperclip.github-star-prompt.seen` in the eval browser. An init script covers later documents of the app origin, and the open page is marked directly. A test checks that the key equals `STAR_PROMPT_SEEN_KEY` in `ui/src/components/GitHubStarPrompt.tsx`. - `tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-domains/api-read-receipts.ts`: bind dedicated task read tools by the digest of the `call_api` input that the server builds for them (`taskBridgeApiRequest`). The result must carry the same `apiOperationId`. Other tools, other records, mismatched receipts and unpaired results do not count. - Bump `oracleVersion` in code and descriptor for every case that uses `api-read-receipts.ts` (shared grader change) and for `navigation-preferences.edit-profile`. Add `internal-comment-reference.ts` to the source files of the two cases that now import it. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts` (whole config): 11301 passed; 1 local-only failure in `controller-replacement-smoke.test.ts` (server spawn, no changed imports). - `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts --testTimeout=180000 tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-domains tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-contract.test.ts tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts tests/runner-e2e/chat-returning-browser.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts source-sdk` - `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs $(git rev-parse HEAD) --check` reports `changed: false`. - Red checks: with the `f4337bb5fb` registry, the new pin test fails and names 15 inputs. Without the new waits, the two rendered-reply tests fail. A regrade of the retained `explain-card` run events now gives the follow-up run `unavailable: true, live: false` and the first run `live: true`. - Paid runs of the affected cells (`chat-features.runner-opencode.local.*`): - Run 42852698879 (head `d54c04d5f0`): `track-delegated-work`, `restore-archive`, `explain-card`, `configure-plugin` and `plugin-managed-routine` pass. I read each reply and saved state. `track-delegated-work` now records the rendered `/COM/issues/COM-2` link. `explain-card` records `laterUnavailable: true, laterLive: false` from the follow-up `get_task` 404. - `plugins.install-plugin` now starts its server (the pin refusal is gone). It fails a later grading check, `truthful-installation-handoff`: the reply sends the person to the plugin settings page but does not name the package. This is outside this PR. - `inbox-search.archive-done`: the star prompt no longer blocks the composer, and the query is sent. The agent then archives the 501 Done tasks one at a time (about 2 s each, 57 in the 240 s window), because only the per-task archive route exists. This is outside this PR. - `navigation-preferences.edit-profile` did not start in that run (the AWS credentials step timed out). Run 42857020103 (head `2f0b80aa84`): pass. The agent write gets 401, the reply links `/COM/company/settings/instance/profile`, and the person follows the rendered link and saves the name. ## Risks - Low risk. Test harness only; no product code changes. - The receipt change counts more reads as record reads. It only adds dedicated reads bound to the exact record id and operation, so a grader that needs a read can pass on a genuine `get_task` read. The affected cases have new oracle versions. - The star prompt is not tested by any chat catalog case. Product e2e tests for the prompt do not use this flow. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use (shell, file editing, test execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
59 lines
4.3 KiB
TypeScript
59 lines
4.3 KiB
TypeScript
import { expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import { apiReadStatuses, apiReadDigests, readRecord, recordParams } from "./api-read-receipts.js";
|
|
import { savedCall } from "./api-read-receipts.test-fixtures.js";
|
|
|
|
const activity = (pathParams: Record<string, string>, query?: Record<string, unknown>) => ({ operationId: "GET /api/issues/{id}/activity", pathParams, ...(query ? { query } : {}) });
|
|
const reads = [{ operationId: "GET /api/issues/{id}/activity", pathParams: recordParams("id", "task-uuid", "COM-1"), paged: true }];
|
|
|
|
it("the redactor removes the response body and the task id, keeping only the input digest", () => {
|
|
const saved = JSON.stringify(savedCall(activity({ id: "task-uuid" }), 200, "1", "run-1", [{ entityId: "task-uuid" }]));
|
|
expect(saved).not.toContain("task-uuid");
|
|
expect(saved).toContain("apiPayloadSha256");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("binds a successful saved read to the record by id, identifier and paging query", () => {
|
|
expect(readRecord(savedCall(activity({ id: "task-uuid" }), 200), reads)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(readRecord(savedCall(activity({ id: "COM-1" }), 200), reads)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(readRecord(savedCall(activity({ id: "COM-1" }, { limit: 50 }), 200), reads)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(readRecord(savedCall(activity({ id: "COM-1" }, { limit: "50" }), 200), reads)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects other records, other operations, failures and unpaired results", () => {
|
|
expect(readRecord(savedCall(activity({ id: "other-task" }), 200), reads)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(readRecord(savedCall({ operationId: "GET /api/issues/{id}", pathParams: { id: "task-uuid" } }, 200), reads)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(readRecord(savedCall(activity({ id: "task-uuid" }), 403), reads)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(readRecord(savedCall(activity({ id: "task-uuid" }), 200).slice(0, 1), reads)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(readRecord([...savedCall(activity({ id: "task-uuid" }), 200, "1", "run-a").slice(0, 1), ...savedCall(activity({ id: "other" }), 200, "1", "run-b").slice(1)], reads)).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("reports the status of a bound read so a 404 can prove an unavailable record", () => {
|
|
expect(apiReadStatuses(savedCall(activity({ id: "task-uuid" }), 404), apiReadDigests(reads))).toEqual([{ operationId: "GET /api/issues/{id}/activity", ok: false, status: 404 }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const getTask = (taskId: string, status: number, tool = "get_task", runId = "run-1") => savedCall({ taskId }, status, "2", runId, { id: taskId }, tool, "GET /api/issues/{id}");
|
|
const issueRead = [{ operationId: "GET /api/issues/{id}", pathParams: recordParams("id", "task-uuid", "COM-1") }];
|
|
|
|
it("the redactor keeps a dedicated get_task input in plaintext and its result as a receipt", () => {
|
|
const [use, result] = getTask("task-uuid", 404);
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(use)).toContain("task-uuid");
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(result)).not.toContain("task-uuid");
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(result)).toContain("apiPayloadSha256");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("binds dedicated task read tools to the record like the call_api input the server builds", () => {
|
|
expect(apiReadStatuses(getTask("task-uuid", 404), apiReadDigests(issueRead))).toEqual([{ operationId: "GET /api/issues/{id}", ok: false, status: 404 }]);
|
|
expect(readRecord(getTask("COM-1", 200), issueRead)).toBe(true);
|
|
for (const tool of ["paperclip_get_task", "mcp__paperclip__get_task"]) expect(readRecord(getTask("task-uuid", 200, tool), issueRead)).toBe(true);
|
|
const docs = [{ operationId: "GET /api/issues/{id}/documents/{key}", pathParams: [{ id: "task-uuid", key: "plan" }] }];
|
|
expect(readRecord(savedCall({ taskId: "task-uuid", key: "plan" }, 200, "3", "run-1", {}, "read_task_document", "GET /api/issues/{id}/documents/{key}"), docs)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects dedicated reads of other records, other tools, mismatched receipts and unpaired results", () => {
|
|
expect(readRecord(getTask("other-task", 200), issueRead)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(readRecord(getTask("task-uuid", 200, "comment_on_task"), issueRead)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(readRecord(getTask("task-uuid", 200, "get_task_context"), issueRead)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(readRecord(savedCall({ taskId: "task-uuid" }, 200, "2", "run-1", {}, "get_task", "GET /api/issues/{id}/comments"), issueRead)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(readRecord(getTask("task-uuid", 200).slice(0, 1), issueRead)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(readRecord([...getTask("task-uuid", 200, "get_task", "run-a").slice(0, 1), ...getTask("task-uuid", 200, "get_task", "run-b").slice(1)], issueRead)).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|