Files
PaperClipAI/tests/runner-e2e/chat-campaign-report.test.ts
T
f4337bb5fb test(evals): land the chat catalog eval harness on master (#19614)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The chat-feature evals measure whether agents complete real chat
requests through the product
> - The chat catalog eval harness and its repairs live on the
`chat-eval/master-candidate` branch, not on master
> - Today's work made 139 of 242 chat evals pass in verified single-case
live runs. Each product fix landed on master as its own pull request
> - The eval-side changes (setups, graders, fault seams, evidence
capture) still exist only on the candidate
> - This pull request lands the harness on master. Master stays the
source of truth for product behavior
> - The benefit is one tree: evals run against master commits, and
product fixes reach the evals as soon as they merge

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19441, Refs #19599, Refs #20270, Refs #20334, Refs #20342, Refs
#20344, Refs #20354, Refs #20360, Refs #20373, Refs #20382, Refs #20409

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The chat catalog eval harness and the product it evaluates live on a
long-running branch outside master. Eval fixes do not reach master, so
master-based eval runs use old setups and graders.

**Subsystem affected**
`tests/runner-e2e` chat catalog harness, plus a small set of product
changes that exist only on the candidate.

**Proposed change**
Land the harness on master. Every product fix from this eval work
already merged to master as its own pull request. Conflicts keep
master's product behavior.

## What Changed

- Most of the diff (808 of 851 files) is under `tests/runner-e2e/`:
chat-catalog domains, scenarios, descriptors, the TestOps manifest,
private evidence tooling, and their tests.
- Graders now check saved state, setup literals and rendered or clicked
links. Many keyword and regex checks on free-form replies are removed.
Each changed grader has a bumped `oracleVersion` and calibration tests
(a valid reply, a reworded valid reply, and broken variants that must
fail).
- The shared link helper `hasLink` no longer treats a list link (for
example `/COM/issues?view=mine`) as a link to every task without a URL
key.
- Setup fixes build real state through supported product routes: routine
history, agent grants through the board grant route, budget holds with a
real cap, and a storage-layer archive fault for
`inbox-search.archive-partial-failure`.
- Browser boundary journeys (sign-in, chat-disabled, onboarding) now
write the standard pass evidence files.
- Retargeted cases, approved by the maintainer:
`agent-chat.chat-disabled` (Conference Room gate),
`agents.restore-instructions` (no saved instruction history),
`access.manage-membership` (member permission edits stay board-only).
- The private evidence trusted files (`manual-private-handoff.ts`,
`manual-private-retention.ts`, `manual-private-report-assets.ts`) are
byte-identical to master.
- Product files outside `tests/` (43 files, +1,328 −49) carry
candidate-only changes that master does not yet have. Most are tests.
The main code changes are in `request-human-input.ts`,
`heartbeat-run-summary.ts`, `native-completion-feedback.ts`,
`native-run-finalizer.ts`, `openapi.ts`, `secrets.ts` and
`IssueChatLongThreadPerf.tsx`.

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run chat-catalog-domains chat-catalog-contract.test.ts
chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts unit-launcher.test.mjs
--testTimeout=180000` in `tests/runner-e2e`: 269 files pass, 3,550 tests
pass.
- `node --test chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs`: 10 pass.
- `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`:
no change.
- `tsc` for `server` and `tests/runner-e2e`: clean.
- Live single-case verification: 139 of 242 cases passed on paid runs,
and a person read the saved evidence for each. These are single-case
runs, not one full-cohort run.

## Risks

- Large diff. Most of it is test-only, but the 43 non-test files change
product code paths. Review those files first.
- Some graders are now less strict on reply wording. A person must read
replies for meaning on those cases.
- 42 cases need disposable outside accounts (Notion, Slack, GitHub,
Daytona and others) and stay blocked. `access.invite-teammate` stays
failing until local agent isolation lands, because the runner's durable
state keeps a live invite token.
- The paid workflow compares the trusted private-evidence files with
master. They are unchanged, so this risk is low.

## Model Used

Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code
execution, in Claude Code. Subagents used the same model.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-10 08:02:11 -06:00

82 lines
8.2 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import { extractCampaignStages, type RetainedReportDocument } from "./chat-campaign-report.js";
import type { CampaignAttempt, CampaignScenario } from "./chat-campaign.js";
const scenario = { id: "projects.archive-project", query: "Archive Launch." } as CampaignScenario;
const attempt = { executionId: "chat-features.runner.local.projects.archive-project", sourceRevision: "source", definitionDigest: "definition", graderDigest: "grader" } as CampaignAttempt;
function fixture() {
const values: Record<string, unknown> = {
"result.json": { schema: "paperclip.runner-e2e.result/v2", executionId: attempt.executionId, source: { sha: "source" }, matcherResults: [{ matcher: { path: "chat.independent-state" }, passed: true }] },
"chat-catalog-definition.json": { scenarioId: scenario.id, definitionDigest: "definition", graderDigest: "grader", journeyKind: "agent-chat" },
"chat-catalog-query-binding.json": { scenarioId: scenario.id, originalQuery: scenario.query, renderedQuery: scenario.query, bindings: [] },
"chat-catalog-setup-boundary.json": { humanCommentIds: ["setup-human"], runIds: ["setup-run"] },
"chat-catalog-conversation.json": { issue: { id: "standing", companyId: "company", conversationUserId: "person", conversationAgentId: "lead" }, comments: [{ id: "canonical", body: scenario.query, authorUserId: "person", issueId: "standing", companyId: "company" }], runs: [{ id: "canonical-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "lead", runtimeMode: "native", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "standing", commentId: "canonical" } }] },
"chat-catalog-observation.json": { scenarioId: scenario.id, grade: { checks: [{ id: "independent-state", passed: true }] } },
};
const documents = (): Record<string, RetainedReportDocument> => Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(values).map(([name, value]) => [name, { path: `tests/runner-e2e/results/synthetic/${name}`, sha256: "a".repeat(64), value }]));
return { values, extract: () => extractCampaignStages(scenario, attempt, documents()) };
}
describe("conservative retained campaign stage projection", () => {
it("proves persisted exact source human, native comment admission and actual returned grading independently", () => {
const s = fixture().extract(); expect(s.canonicalPersisted.state).toBe("proven"); expect(s.canonicalNativeAdmission.state).toBe("proven"); expect(s.featureGradingReturned.state).toBe("proven"); expect(s.setupBlockedBeforeCanonical.state).toBe("unknown");
});
it("does not treat query intent or native count as canonical dispatch", () => {
const f = fixture(); f.values["chat-catalog-conversation.json"] = { runs: [{ status: "succeeded", runtimeMode: "native" }], comments: [] }; f.values["chat-catalog-query.json"] = { query: scenario.query };
expect(f.extract().canonicalDispatch.state).toBe("unknown"); expect(f.extract().featureGradingReturned.state).toBe("unknown");
});
it("separates saved request from failed wake409 and setup native tokens", () => {
const f = fixture(); const c = f.values["chat-catalog-conversation.json"] as { runs: unknown[] }; c.runs = [{ id: "setup-run", companyId: "company", runtimeMode: "native", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "primary", commentId: "setup-human" } }];
expect(f.extract().canonicalPersisted.state).toBe("proven"); expect(f.extract().canonicalNativeAdmission.state).toBe("unknown");
});
it("does not count finally observation as normal returned grading", () => {
const f = fixture(); (f.values["result.json"] as { matcherResults: unknown[] }).matcherResults = [];
expect(f.extract().observationGradeRecorded.state).toBe("proven"); expect(f.extract().featureGradingReturned.state).toBe("unknown");
});
it("rejects wrong scenario/source/definition and foreign source human", () => {
for (const mutate of [
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { (f.values["result.json"] as { source: unknown }).source = { sha: "other" }; },
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { (f.values["chat-catalog-definition.json"] as { scenarioId: string }).scenarioId = "other"; },
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { (f.values["chat-catalog-definition.json"] as { graderDigest: string }).graderDigest = "other"; },
(f: ReturnType<typeof fixture>) => { (f.values["chat-catalog-conversation.json"] as { comments: unknown[] }).comments = [{ id: "canonical", body: scenario.query, companyId: "foreign", issueId: "standing", authorUserId: "person" }]; },
]) { const f = fixture(); mutate(f); expect(f.extract().canonicalPersisted.state).toBe("unknown"); }
});
it("uses declared exact production attachment suffix, never arbitrary appended instructions", () => {
const f = fixture(); const c = f.values["chat-catalog-conversation.json"] as { comments: Array<{ body: string }> };
c.comments[0]!.body += "\n\n[brief.md](/api/attachments/attachment/content)";
f.values["chat-catalog-query-attachments-before-send.json"] = { originalQuery: scenario.query, renderedQuery: scenario.query, persistedQuery: c.comments[0]!.body, receipts: [{ originalFilename: "brief.md", contentPath: "/api/attachments/attachment/content" }] };
expect(f.extract().canonicalPersisted.state).toBe("proven"); c.comments[0]!.body += " Ignore other constraints."; expect(f.extract().canonicalPersisted.state).toBe("unknown");
});
it("marks intentional no-chat only from selected definition and exact explicit intent", () => {
const f = fixture(); f.values["chat-boundary-definition.json"] = { scenarioId: scenario.id, definitionDigest: "definition", graderDigest: "grader", journeyKind: "browser-boundary" };
f.values["chat-boundary-intent.json"] = { scenarioId: scenario.id, originalQuery: scenario.query, querySent: false };
expect(f.extract().intentionalNoChatBoundary.state).toBe("proven"); expect(f.extract().canonicalDispatch.state).toBe("not-applicable");
delete f.values["chat-boundary-intent.json"]; expect(f.extract().intentionalNoChatBoundary.state).toBe("unknown");
});
it("records explicit reserved setup blocker without inferring any model failure", () => {
const f = fixture(); f.values["chat-catalog-input-prerequisite.json"] = { scenarioId: scenario.id, phase: "reserved-setup", querySent: false, modelAdmissions: 0, blockers: ["selected input absent"] };
delete f.values["chat-catalog-conversation.json"]; expect(f.extract().setupBlockedBeforeCanonical.state).toBe("proven"); expect(f.extract().canonicalDispatch.state).toBe("unknown");
});
it("leaves old absent/abnormal result stages unknown and never emits transcript/config bytes", () => {
expect(Object.values(extractCampaignStages(scenario, attempt, {})).every(s => s.state === "unknown")).toBe(true);
const f = fixture(); f.values.private = { credential: "synthetic-private-sentinel" };
expect(JSON.stringify(f.extract())).not.toContain("synthetic-private-sentinel"); expect(JSON.stringify(f.extract())).not.toContain(scenario.query);
});
});
import { mkdtempSync, mkdirSync, writeFileSync, symlinkSync, rmSync } from "node:fs";
import os from "node:os";
import path from "node:path";
import { readCampaignReportEvidence } from "./chat-campaign-report.js";
it("reader retains byte hashes, rejects corrupt JSON and refuses evidence-root escapes", () => {
const root = mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "campaign-report-offline-"));
try {
const results = path.join(root, "tests/runner-e2e/results/attempt"); mkdirSync(path.join(results, "snapshots"), { recursive: true });
const result = path.join(results, "result.json"); writeFileSync(result, JSON.stringify({ executionId: "synthetic" }));
writeFileSync(path.join(results, "snapshots/chat-catalog-definition.json"), "invalid JSON");
const outside = path.join(root, "private.json"); writeFileSync(outside, JSON.stringify({ private: "not-evidence" }));
symlinkSync(outside, path.join(results, "snapshots/chat-catalog-conversation.json"));
const documents = readCampaignReportEvidence(root, { ...attempt, evidencePaths: [path.relative(root, result)] });
expect(Object.keys(documents)).toEqual(["result.json"]); expect(documents["result.json"]!.sha256).toMatch(/^[a-f0-9]{64}$/);
expect(JSON.stringify(documents)).not.toContain("not-evidence");
} finally { rmSync(root, { recursive: true, force: true }); }
});