## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Contributors use the feature map to understand and verify product capabilities. > - Agents need APIs and usable entry points within their permission boundaries. > - Product recipes and agent access need separate records with shared capability IDs. > - This pull request establishes that contract and gives maintenance ownership of both maps. > - The benefit is repeatable access review without changing product behavior or permissions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #15983, which added the portable verification skills and updated the feature map. This is its contract-only follow-up. Related: #15288 added the original feature map. **Issue type** Missing documentation and maintenance contract. **Where is the issue?** The product map, its missing agent access companions, and the verification skills. **What's wrong?** There is no shared convention for API presence, agent entry points, permission boundaries, access gaps, or evidence. An API declaration does not prove that a permitted native or remote agent can use it. **Suggested fix** Keep the product and agent access maps as siblings under `maps/`. Reuse capability IDs. Record representative source inventory separately from operation review and live proof. Keep both maps aligned through the maintenance skill. ## What Changed - Move the existing product map to `maps/feature-map/`. Preserve its recipes and Poteto format. Update relative links and add companion links. - Add `maps/agent-access-map/` with 35 area files and 171 matching capability IDs. Seed representative API operations, agent paths, policies and known gaps from the reviewed source inventory. Mark entries as `baseline`, `source-only`, and live verification `not-run`. - Define the shared contract in `maps/README.md`. Track API presence, agent availability, policy, evidence and review depth separately. Require operation enumeration before marking a broad capability operation-reviewed. - Extend `maintain-verification-skill` to reconcile both maps and inspect actual route policy and production tool admission. Update creation, verification, notices and contributor references to use the shared contract. - Add `scripts/check-maps.mjs` and ten regression tests. Check matching areas/IDs, indexes, references, contract fields, API method/path examples, justified exceptions and evidence-state consistency. - Keep the coverage inventory unchanged. Preserve skill invocation policies and both MIT license blocks. No product API, permission, UI, runtime helper, migration, dependency or workflow changes. ## Verification - Passed: `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` reports 35 paired areas and 171 matching capability IDs. All local map references resolve. - Passed: `node --test scripts/check-maps.test.mjs` runs ten tests. Fixtures cover missing companions, renamed/orphan/duplicate IDs, broken references, missing operation fields, empty exceptions, missing API examples, empty policy fields, and verified evidence without passed verification. - Passed: metadata validation for all three verification skills. Skill and contributor links resolve. Invocation policies and both license blocks are unchanged. - Compared relocated recipes with current master. Contents differ only in relative links and companion links. `coverage.json` is byte-for-byte unchanged. Master's updated read-only interaction test reference is retained. - Passed: `git diff --check`. The branch starts from current master and contains only this contract change. - Repository-wide typecheck, tests and build were not run locally for this documentation and Node structural-check scope. Live agent access was not exercised. Those gaps are explicit in the baseline entries; the structural check does not certify behavior. CI and automated review are pending. ## Risks - The companions are representative source baselines. They are not complete operation inventories or passed agent journeys. - The checker cannot establish actual permissions, native tool admission, operation completeness or truthful live evidence. Maintenance must inspect source and verify with the actual permitted agent context. - External links to the old product-map directory may need updates. Repository references have been updated. - Existing access gaps and board/user restrictions remain recorded. This contract does not change authority or implement missing paths. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex assisted with this change. The session does not expose the exact serving model ID, configured context-window size, or reasoning setting. Capabilities used: source analysis, file edits, shell commands, and structural regression tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
11 KiB
AGENTS.md
Guidance for human and AI contributors working in this repository.
1. Purpose
Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies.
The current implementation target is V1 and is defined in doc/SPEC-implementation.md.
2. Read This First
Before making changes, read in this order:
doc/GOAL.mddoc/PRODUCT.mddoc/SPEC-implementation.mddoc/DEVELOPING.mddoc/DATABASE.md
doc/SPEC.md is long-horizon product context.
doc/SPEC-implementation.md is the concrete V1 build contract.
When adding or changing an Apps catalog connection, also follow
doc/connections/CONNECTOR-PLAYBOOK.md. It is the canonical connection
authoring runbook for provider research, supported transport/auth patterns,
credential handling, branding, implementation, testing, live proof, and PR
submission.
3. Repo Map
server/: Express REST API and orchestration servicesui/: React + Vite board UIpackages/db/: Drizzle schema, migrations, DB clientspackages/shared/: shared types, constants, validators, API path constantspackages/adapters/: agent adapter implementations (Claude, Codex, Cursor, etc.)packages/adapter-utils/: shared adapter utilitiespackages/plugins/: plugin system packagespackages/skills-catalog/: app-shipped skills catalog (@paperclipai/skills-catalog)packages/teams-catalog/: app-shipped teams catalog (@paperclipai/teams-catalog)cli/:paperclipaiCLI package (published bin, agent-facing commands)skills/: Paperclip runtime/operational skills (not part of the app catalog)doc/: operational and product docs
4. Dev Setup (Auto DB)
Use embedded PGlite in dev by leaving DATABASE_URL unset.
pnpm install
pnpm dev
This starts:
- API:
http://localhost:3100 - UI:
http://localhost:3100(served by API server in dev middleware mode)
Quick checks:
curl http://localhost:3100/api/health
curl http://localhost:3100/api/companies
Reset local dev DB:
rm -rf data/pglite
pnpm dev
5. Core Engineering Rules
- Keep changes company-scoped. Every domain entity should be scoped to a company and company boundaries must be enforced in routes/services.
Explicit exception: announcement dismissals are instance-wide user preferences, keyed by user and announcement so they persist across companies. Their audit context must still validate company membership. The announcement publication-ID registry is instance-level feed metadata; it contains no company or user data.
- Keep contracts synchronized. If you change schema/API behavior, update all impacted layers:
packages/dbschema and exportspackages/sharedtypes/constants/validatorsserverroutes/servicesuiAPI clients and pages
- Preserve control-plane invariants.
- Single-assignee task model
- Atomic issue checkout semantics
- Approval gates for governed actions
- Budget hard-stop auto-pause behavior
- Activity logging for mutating actions
-
Do not replace strategic docs wholesale unless asked. Prefer additive updates. Keep
doc/SPEC.mdanddoc/SPEC-implementation.mdaligned. -
Keep repo plan docs dated and centralized. When you are creating a plan file in the repository itself, new plan documents belong in
doc/plans/and should useYYYY-MM-DD-slug.mdfilenames. This does not replace Paperclip issue planning: if a Paperclip issue asks for a plan, update the issueplandocument per thepaperclipskill instead of creating a repo markdown file. -
Attach inspectable generated artifacts. When your task produces a user-inspectable deliverable file, follow the Paperclip skill's "Generated Artifacts and Work Products" workflow before final disposition. In this repo, prefer the self-contained skill helper at
skills/paperclip/scripts/paperclip-upload-artifact.shso the file is available through the Paperclip API, create/update an artifact work product when the file is the deliverable, link the uploaded artifact in the final issue comment, and then set status. Do not rely on local filesystem paths as the only access path. If an important file intentionally remains workspace-only, create/update a work product withmetadata.resourceRef.kind: "workspace_file"and a workspace-relative path, then name that work product and path in the final comment. Treat browse/search as a fallback for recovering workspace files, not the preferred deliverable path. Seedoc/AGENT-ARTIFACTS.mdfor details and.mp4/.webmexamples. -
Name the three data paths correctly. This repo has three separate data paths. Do not confuse them. Match a change to a path by its file path, not by the word "observability" or "telemetry" alone.
- Telemetry is the Paperclip first-party event system. It is opt-out and it sends data to a Paperclip endpoint by default. Its paths are:
packages/shared/src/telemetry/- the generated contract
packages/shared/src/telemetry/generated/paperclip-telemetry.ts - each caller of
packages/shared/src/telemetry/events.tsorpackages/shared/src/telemetry/client.ts
- Observability is the OpenTelemetry trace path. An operator must set an OTLP endpoint. Until an operator sets the endpoint, the tracer is a no-operation. Its paths are:
server/src/instrumentation.tsdoc/observability.mdpackages/adapter-utils/src/duplex-observability.tsserver/src/services/duplex-observability-recorder.ts- the span attributes in
packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/startup-timing.ts
- The run log holds rows in the local
heartbeat_run_eventstable. The data stays in the instance database. Its paths are:doc/run-log-events.mdpackages/db/src/schema/heartbeat_run_events.ts- the append path
appendRunEventinserver/src/services/heartbeat.ts
Apply a review level that matches the path:
- Telemetry change (strict review). The author updates the generated contract first. The author updates
packages/shared/src/telemetry/README.mdin the same pull request. The author requests a privacy review. Reason: a Telemetry event goes to a Paperclip endpoint by default, so a mistake sends data immediately. - Observability change (lighter review). The operator endpoint gate stays in place. The no-operation behaviour stays when no endpoint is set. A privacy review is not necessary while the change stays inside the closed span-attribute allowlist.
- Run-log change (no extra review). A run-log change needs neither review level above, because the data stays in the instance database.
Exclusion. The word "observability" in a file such as server/src/services/recovery-observability.ts names a different concept. Apply this rule by path, not by word match.
6. Database Change Workflow
When changing data model:
- Edit
packages/db/src/schema/*.ts - Ensure new tables are exported from
packages/db/src/schema/index.ts - Generate migration:
pnpm db:generate
- Validate compile:
pnpm -r typecheck
Notes:
packages/db/drizzle.config.tsreads compiled schema fromdist/schema/*.jspnpm db:generatecompilespackages/dbfirst
7. Verification Before Hand-off
maps/feature-map/README.md is an optional reference for user entry points, verification recipes, and coverage gaps. The map records coverage scope, not proof that a live journey passed.
The sibling agent access map records APIs,
agent entry points and permission boundaries using the same capability IDs.
Follow the map contract: update affected entries when mapped
behavior or access changes, and run node scripts/check-maps.mjs after map edits.
Its structural checks do not prove live behavior or authorization.
Default local/agent test path:
pnpm test
This is the cheap default and only runs the Vitest suite. Browser suites stay opt-in:
pnpm test:e2e
pnpm test:release-smoke
Run the browser suites only when your change touches them or when you are explicitly verifying CI/release flows.
For normal issue work, run the smallest relevant verification first. Do not default to repo-wide typecheck/build/test on every heartbeat when a narrower check is enough to prove the change.
Run this full check before claiming repo work done in a PR-ready hand-off, or when the change scope is broad enough that targeted checks are not sufficient:
pnpm -r typecheck
pnpm test:run
pnpm build
If anything cannot be run, explicitly report what was not run and why.
8. API and Auth Expectations
- Base path:
/api - Board access is treated as full-control operator context
- Agent access uses bearer API keys (
agent_api_keys), hashed at rest - Agent keys must not access other companies
When adding endpoints:
- apply company access checks
- enforce actor permissions (board vs agent)
- write activity log entries for mutations
- return consistent HTTP errors (
400/401/403/404/409/422/500)
9. UI Expectations
- Keep routes and nav aligned with available API surface
- Use company selection context for company-scoped pages
- Surface failures clearly; do not silently ignore API errors
- Form and wizard footers: keep Save & exit (or Cancel/Back) left and the primary action right in the same vertically aligned row. Each step owns the entire footer; never append Save & exit as a separate row. See
DESIGN.md.
10. Pull Request Requirements
When creating a pull request (via gh pr create or any other method), you must read and fill in every section of .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md. Do not craft ad-hoc PR bodies — use the template as the structure for your PR description. Required sections:
- Thinking Path — trace reasoning from project context to this change (see
CONTRIBUTING.mdfor examples) - What Changed — bullet list of concrete changes
- Verification — how a reviewer can confirm it works
- Risks — what could go wrong
- Model Used — the AI model that produced or assisted with the change (provider, exact model ID, context window, capabilities). Write "None — human-authored" if no AI was used.
- Checklist — all items checked
11. Definition of Done
A change is done when all are true:
- Behavior matches
doc/SPEC-implementation.md - Typecheck, tests, and build pass
- Contracts are synced across db/shared/server/ui
- Docs updated when behavior or commands change
- PR description follows the PR template with all sections filled in (including Model Used)
Design system
DESIGN.md at the repo root is the source of truth for UI design decisions. The token-only rule applies to all ui/ changes: every color, spacing, radius, type, shadow, and motion value in ui/src/components/** and ui/src/pages/** comes from the token layer in ui/src/index.css — no hex, raw px, arbitrary Tailwind bracket values, or raw font-size/fontSize declarations in components, outside the documented allowlist in ui/src/index.css. Run pnpm check:token-gates (scripts/check-token-gates.mjs) before committing UI changes — it fails on any violation not covered by that allowlist.