mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-11 23:36:51 +02:00
DottaandPaperclip
8eff54bc47
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane operators use to manage AI-agent companies. > - Operators can store runtime secrets in provider vaults such as AWS Secrets Manager. > - The server already preserves sanitized AWS failure details, including the failed operation, required IAM capability, region, and safe recovery options. > - The create-secret dialog reduced that structured response to a generic message, leaving operators unable to understand or fix failed AWS writes. > - This pull request keeps the safe structured error through the UI and presents concise, actionable diagnostics without exposing raw AWS principals or account details. > - The benefit is that operators can correct IAM access or link an existing AWS secret immediately instead of debugging an opaque failure. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue was found for this exact UI gap. Bug report: - What happened: creating a Paperclip-managed value in AWS Secrets Manager could fail with a generic dialog error even though the API returned safe, actionable provider details. - Expected behavior: the dialog should identify the AWS operation, required IAM capability, region, provider vault, and safe alternative while keeping raw cloud-provider details redacted. - Steps to reproduce: configure an AWS Secrets Manager provider vault without `secretsmanager:CreateSecret`, then create a Paperclip-managed secret using that vault. - Paperclip version/commit: current `master` before this PR. - Deployment mode: Paperclip server with an AWS Secrets Manager provider vault. Related prior server-side propagation work: - Refs #9161 ## What Changed - Preserve the structured `ApiError` returned by failed create-secret mutations instead of reducing it to a string. - Render AWS-specific, sanitized diagnostics with the required IAM capability, region, provider vault, operation, and external-reference recovery option. - Add a full dialog render regression test that verifies actionable details appear and raw AWS ARN/account information does not. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/Secrets.render.test.tsx` — 1 file passed, 15 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — all gates clean. - `git diff --check public-gh/master...HEAD` — passed. ### Visual Verification QA verified both states in Chromium at head `357cd2271` using the real `Secrets` component and confirmed that raw AWS account, ARN, assumed-role, and provider exception details are absent from the rendered DOM. **AWS access-denied diagnostics**  **Generic non-AWS fallback**  ## Risks Low risk. The change only affects failed create-secret presentation in the UI; successful secret creation, API contracts, schema, and migrations are unchanged. The structured details are server-sanitized, and the regression test confirms raw AWS principal/account data is not rendered. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-5.4` via Codex CLI, with tool-enabled repository editing, shell execution, Git, GitHub, and Paperclip API access. Reasoning mode and exact context-window size were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
@paperclipai/ui
Published static assets for the Paperclip board UI.
What gets published
The npm package contains the production build under dist/. It does not ship the UI source tree or workspace-only dependencies.
Storybook
Storybook config, stories, and fixtures live under ui/storybook/.
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui storybook
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build-storybook
Typical use
Install the package, then serve or copy the built files from node_modules/@paperclipai/ui/dist.