mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-03 01:27:09 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, so execution policy and trust boundaries are part of the product's safety contract. > - Low-trust review work needs narrower authority than normal same-company agents because hostile PRs, comments, attachments, and generated output can carry prompt-injection payloads. > - The current V1 shape gives trusted workers broad company context, which is useful for normal execution but too permissive for a reviewer assigned to hostile content. > - This branch adds a `low_trust_review` preset, source-trust tagging, route-level containment, and quarantine handling so low-trust output does not automatically flow into higher-trust wake context. > - The branch has been rebased onto current `origin/master`, and the low-trust migration was renumbered to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql` to avoid collisions with existing `0091` through `0096` migrations. > - Greptile feedback was addressed by tightening low-trust detection, preserving project-level trust policy checks, fixing issue-kind promotion lookup, removing duplicate post-lease isolation assertion, documenting fail-closed source-trust behavior, bounding ancestry checks, enforcing runtime issue context for CEOs, awaiting accepted-plan monitor authorization, and making low-trust issue source-trust tagging atomic. > - The benefit is a first production slice of deny-by-default review containment with regression coverage for the main control-plane pivot surfaces. Fixes #7531. ## What Changed - Added shared trust-policy types and validators, plus database/source-trust fields for issues, comments, documents, and work products. - Implemented server enforcement for low-trust issue scope, agent self-view redaction, secret/plugin/runtime denial paths, promotion checks, and quarantined continuation/wake context. - Added focused low-trust regression tests for resolver behavior, source trust, route authorization, heartbeat preflight ordering, runtime containment, and quarantine redaction. - Added board UI affordances for selecting/reviewing the low-trust preset and surfacing source-trust badges in relevant issue views. - Added `doc/LOW-TRUST-PRESETS.md`, updated `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and committed the low-trust review contract plan under `doc/plans/`. - Rebasing note: the original `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql` migration was renamed to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied the old-numbered migration are not broken by the renumbered migration. ## Verification - Rebased branch onto current `origin/master` and force-pushed with lease to `origin/PAP-10211-low-trust-agent` at head `2719f31e3`. - Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. - Resolved upstream UI/comment conflicts by preserving deleted-comment tombstone behavior and low-trust source-trust badges/metadata. - Renumbered the low-trust source-trust migration to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied an old-numbered copy are not broken. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/source-trust.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts ui/src/lib/trust-policy-ui.test.ts ui/src/components/TrustPresetSection.test.tsx` - `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps` - `git diff --check` - GitHub checks pass on head `2719f31e3`: build, typecheck/release registry, general tests, serialized server suites, e2e, canary, verify, policy/review, Socket, and Snyk. - Greptile Review passes with Confidence Score 5/5 and zero unresolved Greptile review threads. - No design screenshots/images were added because the task explicitly says not to add them unless they are specifically part of the work. ## Risks - Medium risk: this touches shared trust-policy contracts, server authorization paths, heartbeat context generation, migration metadata, and UI preset controls. - Low-trust containment is intentionally deny-by-default; legitimate future review workflows may need explicit allowlisted exceptions. - Plugin/runtime/security surfaces are broad, so regression tests cover the current known routes but future integrations must route through the same containment layer. - The PR is ready for review; GitHub checks are green and Greptile is 5/5. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled shell and GitHub CLI workflow. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] UI changes are covered by focused tests; no screenshots were added per task instruction not to add design images unless specifically required - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
391 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
391 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
import express from "express";
|
|
import request from "supertest";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const issueId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
|
|
const companyId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
|
|
|
|
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockDocumentsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
listIssueDocuments: vi.fn(),
|
|
listIssueDocumentRevisions: vi.fn(),
|
|
restoreIssueDocumentRevision: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
canUser: vi.fn(),
|
|
decide: vi.fn(),
|
|
hasPermission: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockAgentService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const mockLogActivity = vi.hoisted(() => vi.fn(async () => undefined));
|
|
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
wakeup: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
reportRunActivity: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockInstanceSettingsService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(async () => ({
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
general: {
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
},
|
|
})),
|
|
getExperimental: vi.fn(async () => ({})),
|
|
getGeneral: vi.fn(async () => ({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" })),
|
|
listCompanyIds: vi.fn(async () => [companyId]),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockRoutineService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
syncRunStatusForIssue: vi.fn(async () => undefined),
|
|
}));
|
|
const mockIssueThreadInteractionService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: vi.fn(async () => []),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
const planDocument = {
|
|
id: "document-1",
|
|
companyId,
|
|
issueId,
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
title: "Plan",
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "# Plan",
|
|
latestRevisionId: "revision-2",
|
|
latestRevisionNumber: 2,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
updatedByAgentId: null,
|
|
updatedByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:10:00.000Z"),
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const systemDocument = {
|
|
...planDocument,
|
|
id: "document-2",
|
|
key: "system-plan",
|
|
title: "System plan",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
function registerModuleMocks() {
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/access.js", () => ({
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/activity-log.js", () => ({
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/agents.js", () => ({
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/documents.js", () => ({
|
|
documentAnnotationService: () => ({ remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [] }),
|
|
documentService: () => mockDocumentsService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/heartbeat.js", () => ({
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/instance-settings.js", () => ({
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/issues.js", () => ({
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/routines.js", () => ({
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.doMock("../services/index.js", () => ({
|
|
companyService: () => ({
|
|
getById: vi.fn(async () => ({ id: "company-1", attachmentMaxBytes: 10 * 1024 * 1024 })),
|
|
}),
|
|
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
|
|
agentService: () => mockAgentService,
|
|
documentAnnotationService: () => ({ remapOpenThreadsForDocument: async () => [] }),
|
|
documentService: () => mockDocumentsService,
|
|
executionWorkspaceService: () => ({}),
|
|
feedbackService: () => ({}),
|
|
goalService: () => ({}),
|
|
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
|
|
instanceSettingsService: () => mockInstanceSettingsService,
|
|
issueApprovalService: () => ({}),
|
|
issueReferenceService: () => ({
|
|
deleteDocumentSource: async () => undefined,
|
|
diffIssueReferenceSummary: () => ({
|
|
addedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
removedReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
currentReferencedIssues: [],
|
|
}),
|
|
emptySummary: () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
listIssueReferenceSummary: async () => ({ outbound: [], inbound: [] }),
|
|
syncComment: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncDocument: async () => undefined,
|
|
syncIssue: async () => undefined,
|
|
}),
|
|
issueRecoveryActionService: () => ({
|
|
getActiveForIssue: vi.fn(async () => null),
|
|
listActiveForIssues: vi.fn(async () => new Map()),
|
|
}),
|
|
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
|
|
issueThreadInteractionService: () => mockIssueThreadInteractionService,
|
|
logActivity: mockLogActivity,
|
|
projectService: () => ({}),
|
|
routineService: () => mockRoutineService,
|
|
workProductService: () => ({}),
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function createRunContextDb(contextSnapshot: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
|
return {
|
|
select: vi.fn(() => ({
|
|
from: vi.fn(() => ({
|
|
where: vi.fn(() => ({
|
|
then: async (resolve: (rows: unknown[]) => unknown) =>
|
|
resolve([{
|
|
id: "run-1",
|
|
companyId,
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
contextSnapshot,
|
|
}]),
|
|
})),
|
|
})),
|
|
})),
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function createApp(
|
|
actor: Express.Request["actor"] = {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: "board-user",
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
source: "local_implicit",
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
},
|
|
db: unknown = {},
|
|
) {
|
|
const [{ issueRoutes }, { errorHandler }] = await Promise.all([
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../routes/issues.js")>("../routes/issues.js"),
|
|
vi.importActual<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>("../middleware/index.js"),
|
|
]);
|
|
const app = express();
|
|
app.use(express.json());
|
|
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
|
|
(req as any).actor = actor;
|
|
next();
|
|
});
|
|
app.use("/api", issueRoutes(db as any, {} as any));
|
|
app.use(errorHandler);
|
|
return app;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue document revision routes", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.resetModules();
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/access.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/activity-log.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/agents.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/documents.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/heartbeat.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/routines.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/index.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/instance-settings.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../services/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/issues.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../routes/authz.js");
|
|
vi.doUnmock("../middleware/index.js");
|
|
registerModuleMocks();
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
mockAccessService.decide.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
allowed: true,
|
|
action: "issue:read",
|
|
reason: "allow_test",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by test mock.",
|
|
});
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: issueId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-881",
|
|
title: "Document revisions",
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
});
|
|
mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocuments.mockImplementation(
|
|
async (_issueId, options: { includeSystem?: boolean } | undefined) =>
|
|
options?.includeSystem ? [planDocument, systemDocument] : [planDocument],
|
|
);
|
|
mockDocumentsService.listIssueDocumentRevisions.mockResolvedValue([
|
|
{
|
|
id: "revision-2",
|
|
companyId,
|
|
documentId: "document-1",
|
|
issueId,
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionNumber: 2,
|
|
title: "Plan v2",
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "# Two",
|
|
changeSummary: null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
restoredFromRevisionId: "revision-1",
|
|
restoredFromRevisionNumber: 1,
|
|
document: {
|
|
id: "document-1",
|
|
companyId,
|
|
issueId,
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
title: "Plan v1",
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "# One",
|
|
latestRevisionId: "revision-3",
|
|
latestRevisionNumber: 3,
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
updatedByAgentId: null,
|
|
updatedByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
createdAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:00:00.000Z"),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date("2026-03-26T12:10:00.000Z"),
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.wakeup.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockHeartbeatService.reportRunActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.get.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: "instance-settings-1",
|
|
general: {
|
|
censorUsernameInLogs: false,
|
|
feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.getExperimental.mockResolvedValue({});
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.getGeneral.mockResolvedValue({ feedbackDataSharingPreference: "prompt" });
|
|
mockInstanceSettingsService.listCompanyIds.mockResolvedValue([companyId]);
|
|
mockRoutineService.syncRunStatusForIssue.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
mockLogActivity.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns revision snapshots including title and format", async () => {
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/plan/revisions`);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual([
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
revisionNumber: 2,
|
|
title: "Plan v2",
|
|
format: "markdown",
|
|
body: "# Two",
|
|
}),
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("filters system documents by default on the document list route", async () => {
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents`);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual([expect.objectContaining({ key: "plan" })]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("passes includeSystem=true through for debug document listing", async () => {
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp()).get(
|
|
`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents?includeSystem=true`,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual([
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ key: "plan" }),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ key: "system-plan" }),
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("restores a revision through the append-only route and logs the action", async () => {
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/plan/revisions/revision-1/restore`)
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
|
|
expect(mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
issueId,
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionId: "revision-1",
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "board-user",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(mockLogActivity).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
expect.anything(),
|
|
expect.objectContaining({
|
|
action: "issue.document_restored",
|
|
details: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
restoredFromRevisionId: "revision-1",
|
|
restoredFromRevisionNumber: 1,
|
|
revisionNumber: 3,
|
|
}),
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(res.body).toEqual(expect.objectContaining({
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
title: "Plan v1",
|
|
latestRevisionNumber: 3,
|
|
}));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("blocks cheap status-only recovery runs from restoring issue documents", async () => {
|
|
mockIssueService.getById.mockResolvedValueOnce({
|
|
id: issueId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
identifier: "PAP-881",
|
|
title: "Document revisions",
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp(
|
|
{
|
|
type: "agent",
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
companyId,
|
|
runId: "run-1",
|
|
source: "agent_jwt",
|
|
},
|
|
createRunContextDb({
|
|
modelProfile: "cheap",
|
|
recoveryIntent: "status_only",
|
|
allowDeliverableWork: false,
|
|
allowDocumentUpdates: false,
|
|
resumeRequiresNormalModel: true,
|
|
}),
|
|
))
|
|
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/plan/revisions/revision-1/restore`)
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
|
|
expect(res.body.error).toContain("Cheap status-only recovery runs cannot update issue documents");
|
|
expect(mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects invalid document keys before attempting restore", async () => {
|
|
const res = await request(await createApp())
|
|
.post(`/api/issues/${issueId}/documents/INVALID KEY/revisions/revision-1/restore`)
|
|
.send({});
|
|
|
|
expect(res.status).toBe(400);
|
|
expect(mockDocumentsService.restoreIssueDocumentRevision).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|