Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/__tests__/activity-routes.test.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip dbebf30c89 Add low-trust review containment (#7530)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, so execution
policy and trust boundaries are part of the product's safety contract.
> - Low-trust review work needs narrower authority than normal
same-company agents because hostile PRs, comments, attachments, and
generated output can carry prompt-injection payloads.
> - The current V1 shape gives trusted workers broad company context,
which is useful for normal execution but too permissive for a reviewer
assigned to hostile content.
> - This branch adds a `low_trust_review` preset, source-trust tagging,
route-level containment, and quarantine handling so low-trust output
does not automatically flow into higher-trust wake context.
> - The branch has been rebased onto current `origin/master`, and the
low-trust migration was renumbered to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`
to avoid collisions with existing `0091` through `0096` migrations.
> - Greptile feedback was addressed by tightening low-trust detection,
preserving project-level trust policy checks, fixing issue-kind
promotion lookup, removing duplicate post-lease isolation assertion,
documenting fail-closed source-trust behavior, bounding ancestry checks,
enforcing runtime issue context for CEOs, awaiting accepted-plan monitor
authorization, and making low-trust issue source-trust tagging atomic.
> - The benefit is a first production slice of deny-by-default review
containment with regression coverage for the main control-plane pivot
surfaces.

Fixes #7531.

## What Changed

- Added shared trust-policy types and validators, plus
database/source-trust fields for issues, comments, documents, and work
products.
- Implemented server enforcement for low-trust issue scope, agent
self-view redaction, secret/plugin/runtime denial paths, promotion
checks, and quarantined continuation/wake context.
- Added focused low-trust regression tests for resolver behavior, source
trust, route authorization, heartbeat preflight ordering, runtime
containment, and quarantine redaction.
- Added board UI affordances for selecting/reviewing the low-trust
preset and surfacing source-trust badges in relevant issue views.
- Added `doc/LOW-TRUST-PRESETS.md`, updated
`doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and committed the low-trust review
contract plan under `doc/plans/`.
- Rebasing note: the original `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`
migration was renamed to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses
`ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied the old-numbered
migration are not broken by the renumbered migration.

## Verification

- Rebased branch onto current `origin/master` and force-pushed with
lease to `origin/PAP-10211-low-trust-agent` at head `2719f31e3`.
- Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or
`.github/workflows` changes.
- Resolved upstream UI/comment conflicts by preserving deleted-comment
tombstone behavior and low-trust source-trust badges/metadata.
- Renumbered the low-trust source-trust migration to
`0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT
EXISTS` so users who already applied an old-numbered copy are not
broken.
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/source-trust.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts
ui/src/lib/trust-policy-ui.test.ts
ui/src/components/TrustPresetSection.test.tsx`
- `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps`
- `git diff --check`
- GitHub checks pass on head `2719f31e3`: build, typecheck/release
registry, general tests, serialized server suites, e2e, canary, verify,
policy/review, Socket, and Snyk.
- Greptile Review passes with Confidence Score 5/5 and zero unresolved
Greptile review threads.
- No design screenshots/images were added because the task explicitly
says not to add them unless they are specifically part of the work.

## Risks

- Medium risk: this touches shared trust-policy contracts, server
authorization paths, heartbeat context generation, migration metadata,
and UI preset controls.
- Low-trust containment is intentionally deny-by-default; legitimate
future review workflows may need explicit allowlisted exceptions.
- Plugin/runtime/security surfaces are broad, so regression tests cover
the current known routes but future integrations must route through the
same containment layer.
- The PR is ready for review; GitHub checks are green and Greptile is
5/5.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled shell and GitHub CLI
workflow.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] UI changes are covered by focused tests; no screenshots were added
per task instruction not to add design images unless specifically
required
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-06-05 16:48:02 -05:00

202 lines
6.2 KiB
TypeScript

import express from "express";
import request from "supertest";
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
const mockActivityService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
list: vi.fn(),
forIssue: vi.fn(),
runsForIssue: vi.fn(),
issuesForRun: vi.fn(),
create: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockHeartbeatService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getRun: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockIssueService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
getById: vi.fn(),
getByIdentifier: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockAccessService = vi.hoisted(() => ({
decide: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock("../services/activity.js", () => ({
activityService: () => mockActivityService,
normalizeActivityLimit: (limit: number | undefined) => {
if (!Number.isFinite(limit)) return 100;
return Math.max(1, Math.min(500, Math.floor(limit ?? 100)));
},
}));
vi.mock("../services/index.js", () => ({
accessService: () => mockAccessService,
issueService: () => mockIssueService,
heartbeatService: () => mockHeartbeatService,
}));
async function createApp(
actor: Record<string, unknown> = {
type: "board",
userId: "user-1",
companyIds: ["company-1"],
source: "session",
isInstanceAdmin: false,
},
) {
vi.resetModules();
const [{ errorHandler }, { activityRoutes }] = await Promise.all([
import("../middleware/index.js") as Promise<typeof import("../middleware/index.js")>,
import("../routes/activity.js") as Promise<typeof import("../routes/activity.js")>,
]);
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
app.use((req, _res, next) => {
(req as any).actor = {
...actor,
companyIds: Array.isArray(actor.companyIds) ? [...actor.companyIds] : actor.companyIds,
};
next();
});
app.use("/api", activityRoutes({} as any));
app.use(errorHandler);
return app;
}
async function requestApp(
app: express.Express,
buildRequest: (baseUrl: string) => request.Test,
) {
const { createServer } = await vi.importActual<typeof import("node:http")>("node:http");
const server = createServer(app);
try {
await new Promise<void>((resolve) => {
server.listen(0, "127.0.0.1", resolve);
});
const address = server.address();
if (!address || typeof address === "string") {
throw new Error("Expected HTTP server to listen on a TCP port");
}
return await buildRequest(`http://127.0.0.1:${address.port}`);
} finally {
if (server.listening) {
await new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => {
server.close((error) => {
if (error) reject(error);
else resolve();
});
});
}
}
}
describe.sequential("activity routes", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
for (const mock of Object.values(mockActivityService)) mock.mockReset();
for (const mock of Object.values(mockHeartbeatService)) mock.mockReset();
for (const mock of Object.values(mockIssueService)) mock.mockReset();
mockAccessService.decide.mockReset();
mockAccessService.decide.mockResolvedValue({
allowed: true,
action: "company_scope:read",
reason: "allow_test",
explanation: "Allowed by test mock.",
});
});
it("limits company activity lists by default", async () => {
mockActivityService.list.mockResolvedValue([]);
const app = await createApp();
const res = await requestApp(app, (baseUrl) => request(baseUrl).get("/api/companies/company-1/activity"));
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockActivityService.list).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: undefined,
entityType: undefined,
entityId: undefined,
limit: 100,
});
});
it("caps requested company activity list limits", async () => {
mockActivityService.list.mockResolvedValue([]);
const app = await createApp();
const res = await requestApp(app, (baseUrl) =>
request(baseUrl).get("/api/companies/company-1/activity?limit=5000&entityType=issue"),
);
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockActivityService.list).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
companyId: "company-1",
agentId: undefined,
entityType: "issue",
entityId: undefined,
limit: 500,
});
});
it("resolves alphanumeric issue identifiers before loading runs", async () => {
mockIssueService.getByIdentifier.mockResolvedValue({
id: "issue-uuid-1",
companyId: "company-1",
});
mockActivityService.runsForIssue.mockResolvedValue([
{
runId: "run-1",
adapterType: "codex_local",
},
]);
const app = await createApp();
const res = await requestApp(app, (baseUrl) => request(baseUrl).get("/api/issues/pc1a2-475/runs"));
expect(res.status).toBe(200);
expect(mockIssueService.getByIdentifier).toHaveBeenCalledWith("PC1A2-475");
expect(mockIssueService.getById).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockActivityService.runsForIssue).toHaveBeenCalledWith("company-1", "issue-uuid-1");
expect(res.body).toEqual([{ runId: "run-1", adapterType: "codex_local" }]);
});
it("requires company access before creating activity events", async () => {
const app = await createApp();
const res = await requestApp(app, (baseUrl) => request(baseUrl)
.post("/api/companies/company-2/activity")
.send({
actorId: "user-1",
action: "test.event",
entityType: "issue",
entityId: "issue-1",
}));
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockActivityService.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("requires company access before listing issues for another company's run", async () => {
mockHeartbeatService.getRun.mockResolvedValue({
id: "run-2",
companyId: "company-2",
});
const app = await createApp();
const res = await requestApp(app, (baseUrl) => request(baseUrl).get("/api/heartbeat-runs/run-2/issues"));
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
expect(mockActivityService.issuesForRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("rejects anonymous heartbeat run issue lookups before run existence checks", async () => {
const app = await createApp({ type: "none", source: "none" });
const res = await requestApp(app, (baseUrl) => request(baseUrl).get("/api/heartbeat-runs/missing-run/issues"));
expect(res.status).toBe(401);
expect(mockHeartbeatService.getRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockActivityService.issuesForRun).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});