Files
PaperClipAI/packages
DottaandPaperclip d172197117 feat(storage): add plain directory sync with conflict preflight (#14416)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agent runs use workspace transport to restore and collect files.
> - Some directories belong to the agent across tasks.
> - Those directories need plain file transport without task Git state.
> - A concurrent file edit must be detected before a merge changes any
file.
> - This pull request adds optional plain-directory sync and conflict
preflight.
> - Existing task workspace sync keeps its defaults.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #14325. This is the transport prerequisite for a replacement of its
instruction revision design with current agent files.

## What Changed

- Add an opt-in plain-directory transport mode to command and sandbox
runtimes.
- Add strict merge preflight for file edits, deletions, and directory
changes.
- Accept identical replay after an interrupted merge. Preserve competing
changes.
- Set the compiled OpenCode test executable to 0755, independent of the
CI host’s file-creation mask. Preserve the original startup error if
cleanup also fails.

## Verification

- At `ced53ae532ce6966cad5a83575d83db61af98126`, all 212 targeted
transport tests passed across workspace restore, remote managed runtime,
SSH fixture, and execution-target sandbox suites. Adapter-utils
typecheck passed.
- Real isolated SSH retry fixture previously passed with
`PAPERCLIP_ENABLE_DARWIN_SSH_ENV_LAB=1`; stale deleted files remain
absent while gitignored binary bytes survive.
- Dependent PR #14420 passed real native local, legacy local, and native
Daytona persistence E2E at `169fab46d5af21caa2269b4c1b29b69c933a6951`,
which includes all production transport changes through `ced53ae53`; the
subsequent two commits only fix the OpenCode test fixture. Nine tasks,
three server restarts, and all cleanup checks passed.
- A hosted OpenCode fixture failed twice at `ced53ae53`. Reproduced the
failure locally and in Linux with `umask 0002`: the compiler created a
group-writable executable, correctly rejected by the qualified launch
boundary. Explicit 0755 permissions fix the test without weakening the
production guard. The focused test and non-root Linux reproduction now
pass under that same mask.
- Before rebase, head `69e97de0475d34aac5d532e559a405eaf015fd2b`
includes the deterministic fixture permission fix and preserves original
bootstrap diagnostics. All production transport code is unchanged since
the 212-test validation. Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 on this exact head
with no unresolved findings. All 54 current-head checks passed, with two
conditional skips. The full CI run completed successfully, including the
previously failing OpenCode runner shard.

- Merge validation on rebased head
`c509d79dd190c5cb00dc65edfde209097ff21465`: all five commits are
patch-identical to the reviewed branch. All 54 checks passed with two
conditional skips, and fresh Greptile review is 5/5 with no findings.
One retry cleared an npm archive 404 and a Cursor fixture timeout.

## Risks

- New behavior is opt-in. Existing task snapshot behavior retains its
defaults.
- Generic strict merge preflight remains opt-in. The dependent
agent-folder feature rebases changed paths before applying them to
provide per-file last-sync-wins; it does not create a conflict-review
queue.
- This change adds no database migration, dependency, or UI.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The session does not expose a more specific
model ID or context-window size. Reasoning, code execution, and tool use
assisted this change. Live provider validation used `gpt-5.6-sol`.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-29 07:59:11 -05:00
..