mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 21:05:21 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Users guide running agents through messages, questions, and approval cards. > - Messages already wait in a queue when an agent is running. > - Card responses did not appear in that queue. Some question answers also steered a later run without a user click. > - A fast approval could invalidate the agent's review handoff and cause it to stop its own run. > - This pull request gives card responses the same queue controls and preserves the exact response during delivery. > - Users can wait for completion or explicitly send the response with Interrupt or Steer. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13517, which is merged. This PR targets master and adds queued interaction responses on top of the onboarding changes. Related continuation work: #10519 and #12866. **What happened?** Accepting a proposal while its source run was active left a saved response outside the message queue. The agent could then lose its review path, reassign the task, and cancel itself. Answers to older questions could also steer another active turn without a click. **Expected behavior** Save the response immediately. Queue its continuation behind the active run. Deliver it after completion, or when the user explicitly chooses Interrupt or Steer. Preserve approval revisions and answer choices. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Let an agent publish a confirmation card while its run is still active. 2. Accept the card before the agent finishes its review handoff. 3. Inspect the message queue and the task's next run. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on da8a3876c with the onboarding changes from #13517. **Deployment mode** Local development from source. The fix covers legacy adapters and native Runner turns. ## What Changed - Project resolved cards into the existing queue as immutable responses. Keep answers and exact approval revisions. - Require an explicit click to steer a response into a compatible native turn. Use Interrupt when a fresh session is required. - Preserve typed response context through interruption, cleanup waits, and normal queue promotion. Keep the direct answer channel for a provider blocked on its original question request. - Accept the source run's review handoff after its card resolves. Reject stale agent reassignment that would orphan a queued response. - Add deterministic regression tests and an `accept-while-running` case to the first-task suite. Require recorded timestamp overlap before that case can pass. - Keep the first-task skill name out of user-facing messages. ## Verification - Red-green: the original route failed the queue regression; the changed route passes it. - Focused server/UI tests: 139 passed, including 64 queue-route tests. - Runner harness unit tests: 314 passed. - Server, UI, and Runner E2E typechecks passed. UI token gates passed. - Full repository typecheck and build passed. Server typecheck passed again after review fixes. - Review regressions: 165 queue/reopen route tests, 53 wake admission tests, and 18 run identity tests passed. Approval acknowledgement recovery and both message/approval arrival orders are covered. - Full local test run: 12,401 passed; three new admission regressions ran against a cached pre-fix module. A fresh run of that entire suite passed (53 tests). The complete CI suite passed on the final commit. - Previous-head CI at `c28e2ef12`: 32 checks passed and 2 optional Storybook checks skipped. Every server/workspace/browser shard, Runner verification, build, typecheck/release registry, canary, policy, and security check passed. Greptile: 5/5, no unresolved threads. Earlier interrupted CI workers were replaced by this fresh complete run. - After integrating the updated parent: 314 harness tests, 119 queue/admission tests, 44 onboarding/question-delivery tests, and 13 native recovery tests passed locally. Full repository typecheck and build passed. - Clarified the skill wording preference: routine replies describe the action without announcing the internal skill; direct questions and permission/security/execution disclosures remain truthful. - The paid `accept-while-running` scenario is registered for all four local first-task profiles. It has not been run against a model in this change. - Rebased onto the merged parent at `11921075a`; the resulting tree exactly matches the locally verified integration tree. Final-head CI on `b53054807` passed: 54 successful checks, 2 optional Storybook checks skipped, no failed checks. Every new server/browser shard, aggregate verify/e2e gate, Runner, typecheck, build, canary, and security check passed on the first attempt. Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no unresolved threads. ## Risks - Responses now wait instead of implicitly steering another active turn. A provider blocked on the original question still receives its answer directly. - Approval receipts cannot be edited, discarded, or reordered as comments. This preserves the recorded decision. - Interruption must still prove that the prior execution stopped. The tests cover cleanup waits and duplicate delivery. - The new paid overlap case can be unexercised if the model finishes before the click lands. It cannot pass without evidence of overlap. - No database migration is required. This repairs the existing approvals and execution controls; it does not implement the roadmap's work-stream queues. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact deployed model ID and context-window size were not exposed in this session. Capabilities used: agentic reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, terminal commands, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
445 lines
16 KiB
TypeScript
445 lines
16 KiB
TypeScript
import { sanitizeJson } from "./redaction.js";
|
||
import { createHash } from "node:crypto";
|
||
import { firstTaskScenario } from "./first-task-cases.js";
|
||
export type Row = { id: string; [key: string]: any };
|
||
export interface FirstTaskCheckpoint {
|
||
id: string;
|
||
at: string;
|
||
phase:
|
||
| "opening"
|
||
| "response"
|
||
| "clarified"
|
||
| "revised"
|
||
| "accepted"
|
||
| "rejected"
|
||
| "finished";
|
||
issueId: string;
|
||
tasks: Row[];
|
||
agents: Row[];
|
||
comments: Row[];
|
||
interactions: Row[];
|
||
documents: Row[];
|
||
attachments?: Row[];
|
||
runs: Row[];
|
||
}
|
||
export interface FirstTaskEvidence {
|
||
caseId: string;
|
||
nonce: string;
|
||
onboardingIssueId: string;
|
||
agentId: string;
|
||
initialTaskIds: string[];
|
||
instructions: Array<{
|
||
path: string;
|
||
content: string;
|
||
sha256: string;
|
||
contentSha256?: string;
|
||
redacted?: boolean;
|
||
}>;
|
||
source?: { sha: string; ref: string; dirty: boolean };
|
||
runtimeSettings?: Record<string, unknown>;
|
||
configuredModel: string | null;
|
||
observedModels: string[];
|
||
checkpoints: FirstTaskCheckpoint[];
|
||
checks: FirstTaskCheck[];
|
||
}
|
||
export interface FirstTaskCheck {
|
||
id: string;
|
||
passed: boolean;
|
||
/** Unexercised checks remain non-passing, but are not behavioral failures. */
|
||
notReached?: string;
|
||
evidence: string[];
|
||
detail: string;
|
||
}
|
||
export const digestText = (text: string) =>
|
||
createHash("sha256").update(text).digest("hex");
|
||
export function snapshotInstruction(
|
||
path: string,
|
||
content: string,
|
||
secrets: readonly string[] = [],
|
||
) {
|
||
const safe = sanitizeJson({ content }, secrets) as { content: string };
|
||
return {
|
||
path,
|
||
content: safe.content,
|
||
sha256: digestText(content),
|
||
contentSha256: digestText(safe.content),
|
||
redacted: safe.content !== content,
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
/** Only user-visible affirmative proposals count; incidental task nouns do not. */
|
||
function hasTaskProposal(text: string, confirmationCard = false) {
|
||
const affirmative = text.split(/(?<=[.!?])\s+/).filter((sentence) =>
|
||
!/\b(?:no\s+(?:(?:new|child)\s+)?(?:subtask|task)|(?:not|never|won['’]t|don['’]t|without)\b[^.!?]{0,80}\b(?:subtask|task))\b/i.test(sentence),
|
||
).join("\n");
|
||
return /\b(?:approve|accept|propose|proposed|proposing|proposal|suggest|suggested|suggesting|recommend|recommended|recommending|create|creating|set up)\b[\s\S]{0,160}\b(?:subtask|task)\b/i.test(affirmative) ||
|
||
/\b(?:subtask|task)\b[^.!?\n]{0,30}\bproposal\b/i.test(affirmative) ||
|
||
(confirmationCard && (
|
||
/\b(?:I|we)(?:['’]ll| will)\s+(?:save|attach|write|make|open|create)\b[^.!?]{0,160}\b(?:(?:new|child)\s+task|subtask)\b/i.test(affirmative) ||
|
||
/\b(?:subtask|task)\s+(?:I|we)(?:['’]ll| will)\s+(?:create|open|set up)\b/i.test(affirmative)
|
||
));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
export const activeRuns = (runs: Row[]) =>
|
||
runs.filter((run) => ["queued", "running"].includes(run.status));
|
||
export function questionCount(interaction: Row) {
|
||
return (
|
||
interaction.payload?.questionSet?.questions ??
|
||
interaction.payload?.questions ??
|
||
[]
|
||
).length;
|
||
}
|
||
/** Inspect the presentation the user saw, including superseded cards at earlier checkpoints. */
|
||
function gradeQuestionChoices(
|
||
checkpoints: FirstTaskCheckpoint[],
|
||
): FirstTaskCheck {
|
||
const seen = new Set<string>();
|
||
const failures: string[] = [];
|
||
const refs = new Set<string>();
|
||
for (const checkpoint of checkpoints) {
|
||
for (const interaction of checkpoint.interactions) {
|
||
if (interaction.kind !== "ask_user_questions") continue;
|
||
const questions =
|
||
interaction.payload?.questionSet?.questions ??
|
||
interaction.payload?.questions ??
|
||
[];
|
||
for (const question of questions) {
|
||
const key = JSON.stringify([interaction.id, question]);
|
||
if (seen.has(key)) continue;
|
||
seen.add(key);
|
||
// A canonical text question has no visible choice controls. Its legacy
|
||
// compatibility entry may contain a single freeText option; ignore that.
|
||
if (question?.answerMode === "text") continue;
|
||
const labels = new Set<string>(
|
||
(question?.options ?? [])
|
||
.map((option: any) =>
|
||
String(option.label ?? "")
|
||
.trim()
|
||
.toLowerCase(),
|
||
)
|
||
.filter(Boolean),
|
||
);
|
||
if (labels.size >= 2) continue;
|
||
refs.add(checkpoint.id);
|
||
failures.push(
|
||
`${interaction.id} / ${question?.id ?? "unknown question"}: "${question?.prompt ?? ""}" has ${labels.size} distinct choice option(s); expected at least 2, or a text question`,
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
return {
|
||
id: "question-choice-options",
|
||
passed: failures.length === 0,
|
||
detail:
|
||
failures.length > 0
|
||
? failures.join("; ")
|
||
: "Every presented choice question offers at least two distinct options; open-ended text questions are allowed",
|
||
evidence: failures.length > 0 ? [...refs] : checkpoints.map((c) => c.id),
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/** A terminal parent with no child is an assessable wrong outcome, not a transport timeout. */
|
||
export function firstTaskCompletionSettled(
|
||
tasks: Row[],
|
||
initialTaskIds: string[],
|
||
issueId: string,
|
||
): boolean {
|
||
const children = tasks.filter((task) => !initialTaskIds.includes(task.id));
|
||
return children.length > 0
|
||
? children.every((task) => task.status === "done")
|
||
: tasks.some((task) => task.id === issueId && task.status === "done");
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
function isPlanDocument(document: Row): boolean {
|
||
return (
|
||
document.key === "plan" ||
|
||
(/(?:^|[-_])plan(?:$|[-_])/i.test(String(document.key)) &&
|
||
(/\bplan\b/i.test(String(document.title ?? "")) ||
|
||
/^#+\s+plan\b/im.test(String(document.body ?? ""))))
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
/** Plan/proposal documents are planning evidence, never durable completion output. */
|
||
function isPlanningDocument(document: Row): boolean {
|
||
return (
|
||
isPlanDocument(document) ||
|
||
(/(?:^|[-_])proposal(?:$|[-_])/i.test(String(document.key)) &&
|
||
/(?:^|\n)(?:#+\s*)?(?:proposed (?:(?:child|single|first) )?task|(?:(?:first|single)[- ])?task proposal|proposal)\b/i.test(
|
||
`${document.title ?? ""}\n${document.body ?? ""}`,
|
||
))
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
function isVerifiedAttachment(a: Row): boolean {
|
||
return a.contentVerified === true && typeof a.body === "string" && a.contentSha256 === digestText(a.body);
|
||
}
|
||
function attachmentDocument(a: Row): Row {
|
||
return { ...a, key: String(a.originalFilename ?? a.filename ?? "").replace(/\.(?:md|txt)$/i, ""), title: a.title ?? a.originalFilename ?? a.filename };
|
||
}
|
||
function isPlanningAttachment(a: Row): boolean {
|
||
return isVerifiedAttachment(a) && isPlanningDocument(attachmentDocument(a));
|
||
}
|
||
function verifiedFirstTaskOutputs(checkpoint: FirstTaskCheckpoint): Row[] {
|
||
return [...checkpoint.documents, ...(checkpoint.attachments ?? []).filter(isVerifiedAttachment).map(attachmentDocument)];
|
||
}
|
||
export function gradeFirstTask(e: FirstTaskEvidence): FirstTaskCheck[] {
|
||
const scenario = firstTaskScenario(e.caseId, e.nonce);
|
||
const checks: FirstTaskCheck[] = [];
|
||
const add = (
|
||
id: string,
|
||
passed: boolean,
|
||
detail: string,
|
||
refs: string[],
|
||
notReached?: string,
|
||
) =>
|
||
checks.push({
|
||
id,
|
||
passed: notReached ? false : passed,
|
||
detail,
|
||
evidence: refs,
|
||
...(notReached ? { notReached } : {}),
|
||
});
|
||
const first = e.checkpoints.find((c) => c.phase === "response");
|
||
const last = e.checkpoints.at(-1);
|
||
const approval = e.checkpoints.find((c) => c.phase === "accepted");
|
||
const rejection =
|
||
e.caseId === "reject-no-execution"
|
||
? e.checkpoints.find((c) => c.phase === "rejected")
|
||
: undefined;
|
||
const extras = (c: FirstTaskCheckpoint) =>
|
||
c.tasks.filter((t) => !e.initialTaskIds.includes(t.id));
|
||
const seeded = new Set(e.checkpoints[0]?.comments.map((c) => c.id));
|
||
const replies = (c: FirstTaskCheckpoint) =>
|
||
c.comments.filter((r) => r.authorAgentId && !seeded.has(r.id));
|
||
add(
|
||
"recorded-response",
|
||
Boolean(
|
||
first &&
|
||
replies(first).length +
|
||
first.interactions.filter(
|
||
(i) =>
|
||
!e.checkpoints[0]?.interactions.some((old) => old.id === i.id),
|
||
).length >
|
||
0,
|
||
),
|
||
"An agent response or structured interaction was recorded",
|
||
first ? [first.id] : [],
|
||
);
|
||
add(
|
||
"instruction-snapshot",
|
||
e.instructions.some((i) => i.path.endsWith("first-task/SKILL.md")) &&
|
||
e.instructions.some((i) => i.path === "AGENTS.md") &&
|
||
e.instructions.every(
|
||
(i) =>
|
||
digestText(i.content) === (i.contentSha256 ?? i.sha256) &&
|
||
(i.redacted || i.sha256 === digestText(i.content)),
|
||
),
|
||
"Actual persona and skill were retained with verified hashes",
|
||
e.instructions.map((i) => i.path),
|
||
);
|
||
checks.push(gradeQuestionChoices(e.checkpoints));
|
||
if (!first || !last) return checks;
|
||
const text = replies(first)
|
||
.map((r) => r.body ?? "")
|
||
.join("\n");
|
||
const questions = first.interactions.filter(
|
||
(i) =>
|
||
i.kind === "ask_user_questions" &&
|
||
!e.checkpoints[0]?.interactions.some((old) => old.id === i.id),
|
||
);
|
||
add(
|
||
"no-reintroduction",
|
||
!/welcome to paperclip|your first agent teammate/i.test(text),
|
||
"Do not repeat the seeded welcome",
|
||
[first.id],
|
||
);
|
||
add(
|
||
"opening-not-repeated",
|
||
!questions.some((i) =>
|
||
(i.payload?.questionSet?.questions ?? i.payload?.questions ?? []).some(
|
||
(q: any) => q.id === "first-task-opening",
|
||
),
|
||
),
|
||
"Do not post another opening choice",
|
||
[first.id],
|
||
);
|
||
if (scenario.opening === "interview")
|
||
add(
|
||
"interview-questions",
|
||
questions.length === 1 &&
|
||
questionCount(questions[0]) >= 3 &&
|
||
questionCount(questions[0]) <= 4,
|
||
"One structured interview with 3–4 questions",
|
||
[first.id],
|
||
);
|
||
if (scenario.opening === "ambiguous")
|
||
add(
|
||
"focused-clarification",
|
||
questions.length > 0 || (text.match(/\?/g)?.length ?? 0) >= 2,
|
||
"Ask focused questions before proposing ambiguous work",
|
||
[first.id],
|
||
);
|
||
if (["task", "message"].includes(scenario.opening))
|
||
add(
|
||
"subtask-proposal",
|
||
[text, ...first.documents.filter(isPlanningDocument)
|
||
.map((d) => `${d.title ?? ""}\n${d.body ?? ""}`)]
|
||
.some((visible) => hasTaskProposal(visible)) ||
|
||
first.interactions.some((i) =>
|
||
["request_confirmation", "request_checkbox_confirmation"].includes(i.kind) &&
|
||
hasTaskProposal([i.title, i.summary, i.payload?.prompt, i.payload?.detailsMarkdown]
|
||
.filter(Boolean).join("\n"), true),
|
||
),
|
||
"Propose a task for the concrete request",
|
||
[first.id],
|
||
);
|
||
if (scenario.opening === "plan" || e.caseId === "interview-plan-accept") {
|
||
const proposal =
|
||
e.checkpoints.find((c) => c.phase === "clarified") ?? first;
|
||
add(
|
||
"durable-plan",
|
||
proposal.documents.some(
|
||
(d) => isPlanDocument(d) && String(d.body).trim(),
|
||
),
|
||
"Save the requested plan before acceptance",
|
||
[proposal.id],
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
const before = e.checkpoints.filter(
|
||
(c) =>
|
||
c.phase !== "opening" &&
|
||
(!approval || Date.parse(c.at) < Date.parse(approval.at)),
|
||
);
|
||
if (scenario.opening !== "ordinary") {
|
||
add(
|
||
"no-premature-work",
|
||
before.every(
|
||
(c) =>
|
||
extras(c).length === 0 &&
|
||
c.agents.length === e.checkpoints[0].agents.length &&
|
||
c.documents.every(isPlanningDocument) &&
|
||
(c.attachments ?? []).every(isPlanningAttachment) &&
|
||
(c.tasks.find((t) => t.id === c.issueId)?.status !== "done" ||
|
||
Boolean(rejection && Date.parse(c.at) >= Date.parse(rejection.at))),
|
||
),
|
||
"Before acceptance: no hires, execution tasks, finished output, or claimed completion; closing an unexecuted rejected task is allowed",
|
||
before.map((c) => c.id),
|
||
);
|
||
} else {
|
||
add(
|
||
"ordinary-task-control",
|
||
questions.length === 0 &&
|
||
extras(last).length === 0 &&
|
||
verifiedFirstTaskOutputs(last).some(
|
||
(d) =>
|
||
!isPlanningDocument(d) && String(d.body).includes(scenario.marker),
|
||
),
|
||
"Ordinary work produces output without onboarding questions or delegation",
|
||
[last.id],
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
if (e.caseId === "accept-while-running") {
|
||
const accepted = approval?.interactions.find(i => i.status === "accepted" &&
|
||
["request_confirmation", "request_checkbox_confirmation"].includes(i.kind));
|
||
const source = last.runs.find(r => r.id === accepted?.sourceRunId);
|
||
const acceptedAt = Date.parse(accepted?.resolvedAt ?? "");
|
||
const startedAt = Date.parse(source?.startedAt ?? "");
|
||
const finishedAt = Date.parse(source?.finishedAt ?? "");
|
||
const overlapped = Number.isFinite(acceptedAt) && Number.isFinite(startedAt) &&
|
||
Number.isFinite(finishedAt) && startedAt <= acceptedAt && acceptedAt < finishedAt;
|
||
add("accepted-while-running", overlapped,
|
||
"The persisted approval resolution must fall inside its source run's actual execution interval",
|
||
approval ? [approval.id, last.id] : [last.id],
|
||
overlapped ? undefined : "The recording did not prove acceptance during the source run; the concurrency regression was not exercised.");
|
||
}
|
||
if (!scenario.firstResponseOnly && e.caseId !== "reject-no-execution") {
|
||
const notReached = approval
|
||
? undefined
|
||
: "The recording did not reach the acceptance checkpoint; this part of the journey was not evaluated.";
|
||
const acceptedComment = approval?.comments.some(
|
||
(c) => !c.authorAgentId && c.body === scenario.acceptance,
|
||
);
|
||
const acceptedCard = approval?.interactions.some(
|
||
(i) =>
|
||
["request_confirmation", "request_checkbox_confirmation"].includes(
|
||
i.kind,
|
||
) &&
|
||
i.status === "accepted" &&
|
||
i.result?.outcome === "accepted",
|
||
);
|
||
add(
|
||
"acceptance-recorded",
|
||
Boolean(approval && (acceptedComment || acceptedCard)),
|
||
"Explicit acceptance is persisted as a user comment or approved confirmation card",
|
||
approval ? [approval.id] : [],
|
||
notReached,
|
||
);
|
||
if (e.caseId === "interview-plan-accept") {
|
||
add(
|
||
"accepted-plan-retained",
|
||
last.documents.some((d) => isPlanDocument(d) && String(d.body).trim()),
|
||
"The accepted plan remains available as a durable document",
|
||
[last.id],
|
||
notReached,
|
||
);
|
||
} else {
|
||
const children = extras(last);
|
||
add(
|
||
"one-scoped-subtask",
|
||
children.length === 1 &&
|
||
children[0].parentId === e.onboardingIssueId &&
|
||
children[0].assigneeAgentId === e.agentId,
|
||
"Exactly one approved subtask belongs to this onboarding issue and agent",
|
||
[last.id],
|
||
notReached,
|
||
);
|
||
add(
|
||
"creation-after-acceptance",
|
||
Boolean(approval) &&
|
||
children.every(
|
||
(t) =>
|
||
typeof t.createdAt === "string" &&
|
||
Date.parse(t.createdAt) >= Date.parse(approval!.at),
|
||
),
|
||
"Task creation must follow acceptance, including between checkpoints",
|
||
[last.id],
|
||
notReached,
|
||
);
|
||
add(
|
||
"durable-completion",
|
||
children.length === 1 &&
|
||
children[0].status === "done" &&
|
||
verifiedFirstTaskOutputs(last).some(
|
||
(d) =>
|
||
d.issueId === children[0].id &&
|
||
!isPlanningDocument(d) &&
|
||
String(d.body).includes(scenario.marker) &&
|
||
(e.caseId !== "revise-accept" ||
|
||
(!String(d.body).includes(scenario.originalMarker) &&
|
||
/sunday/i.test(d.body))),
|
||
),
|
||
"Approved output is saved on the completed child, with revised scope when applicable",
|
||
[last.id],
|
||
notReached,
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if (e.caseId === "reject-no-execution")
|
||
add(
|
||
"rejection-respected",
|
||
extras(last).length === 0 &&
|
||
last.documents.every(isPlanningDocument) &&
|
||
(last.attachments ?? []).every(isPlanningAttachment) &&
|
||
activeRuns(last.runs).length === 0,
|
||
"Rejected work never executes",
|
||
[last.id],
|
||
rejection
|
||
? undefined
|
||
: "The recording did not reach the rejection checkpoint; the rejection response was not evaluated.",
|
||
);
|
||
add(
|
||
"provider-runs-succeeded",
|
||
last.runs.length > 0 && last.runs.every((r) => r.status === "succeeded"),
|
||
"All observed provider runs settled successfully",
|
||
[last.id],
|
||
);
|
||
return checks;
|
||
}
|