Files
PaperClipAI/scripts/__tests__/e2e-shard.test.mjs
T
Dotta 1da6b37fc5 fix(ci): regenerate stale stacked lockfiles (#12461)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip uses trusted GitHub Actions workflows to verify every pull
request
> - Native stacked pull requests use another pull request branch as
their base
> - A parent layer can change a package manifest without committing
`pnpm-lock.yaml`
> - A child layer can inherit that manifest change without changing a
manifest itself
> - The current policy skips lockfile regeneration for that child and
downstream frozen installs fail
> - This pull request validates the complete merge tree and shares a
regenerated lockfile only when needed
> - The benefit is reliable stacked pull request verification without
weakening the trusted workflow boundary

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A stacked child pull request inherited a package manifest change from
its parent. The child did not change a manifest itself. The policy job
skipped lockfile regeneration. Downstream jobs tried to restore an
artifact that did not exist and then failed during frozen dependency
installation.

**Expected behavior**

The policy job must validate the complete pull request merge tree. It
must upload a regenerated lockfile when the checked-in lockfile is
stale, including on a stacked child layer.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Create a parent pull request that changes `package.json` without
committing `pnpm-lock.yaml`.
2. Create a child pull request on that branch without another manifest
change.
3. Run the trusted pull request workflow for the child.
4. Observe that frozen dependency installation fails because no
`pr-lockfile` artifact exists.

**Paperclip version or commit**

`f173ee09fa5c2ced7806bba47b54c3df853ab4df`

**Deployment mode**

GitHub Actions trusted pull request workflow.

**Agent adapter(s) involved**

Not adapter-specific. This is a core CI workflow bug.

## What Changed

- Regenerate the lockfile from every checked-out merge tree.
- Compare the generated lockfile with the checked-in copy before upload.
- Download the artifact only when the policy job reports that it
uploaded one.
- Fail closed when a reported artifact is missing.
- Add a workflow contract test for stacked lockfile handling.
- Keep the caller pinned to the last merged trusted SHA; after this
implementation merges, a separate activation PR will advance the
immutable pin to its merge commit.

## Verification

- `actionlint .github/workflows/pr-trusted.yml`
- `node --test scripts/__tests__/e2e-shard.test.mjs`

## Risks

- The policy job runs one lockfile-only install for every pull request.
This can add a small amount of CI time.
- A missing artifact now fails immediately when the policy job reports
an upload. This is intentional because it exposes workflow corruption.
- No runtime or product behavior changes.
- The implementation/activation split is intentional: unmerged
PR-authored workflow code must never execute on trusted runners.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex with model `gpt-5`, reasoning, tool use, and code
execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-08-28 15:02:12 -05:00

223 lines
9.7 KiB
JavaScript

import assert from "node:assert/strict";
import { spawnSync } from "node:child_process";
import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
import path from "node:path";
import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
import test from "node:test";
import { loadShardDurations } from "../general-server-shard.mjs";
import { IGNORED_SPECS, listE2eSpecs, selectE2eShard } from "../e2e-shard.mjs";
const repoRoot = path.resolve(path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)), "..", "..");
const script = path.join(repoRoot, "scripts", "e2e-shard.mjs");
const durationsManifest = path.join(repoRoot, "scripts", "e2e-shard-durations.json");
const playwrightConfig = path.join(repoRoot, "tests", "e2e", "playwright.config.ts");
const prCallerWorkflow = path.join(repoRoot, ".github", "workflows", "pr.yml");
const trustedPrWorkflowPath = ".github/workflows/pr-trusted.yml";
const trustedPrWorkflow = path.join(repoRoot, trustedPrWorkflowPath);
const SHARD_COUNT = 3;
function runShard(args) {
const result = spawnSync(process.execPath, [script, ...args], { cwd: repoRoot, encoding: "utf8" });
assert.equal(result.status, 0, `expected success for ${args.join(" ")}: ${result.stderr}`);
return result.stdout.trim().split(/\s+/).filter(Boolean);
}
function readPinnedTrustedPrWorkflow() {
const caller = readFileSync(prCallerWorkflow, "utf8");
const pin = caller.match(
/uses: paperclipai\/paperclip\/\.github\/workflows\/pr-trusted\.yml@([0-9a-f]{40})/,
);
assert.ok(pin, "pr.yml must call the trusted workflow at a full commit SHA");
const result = spawnSync("git", ["show", `${pin[1]}:${trustedPrWorkflowPath}`], {
cwd: repoRoot,
encoding: "utf8",
});
assert.equal(result.status, 0, `cannot read the pinned trusted workflow: ${result.stderr}`);
return result.stdout;
}
test("the e2e shards form a complete, non-overlapping partition", () => {
const specs = listE2eSpecs();
assert.ok(specs.length > 0, "expected a non-empty e2e spec set");
const shards = Array.from({ length: SHARD_COUNT }, (_, index) =>
runShard(["--shard-index", String(index), "--shard-count", String(SHARD_COUNT)]),
);
const combined = shards.flat();
assert.equal(combined.length, specs.length, "every spec must land on exactly one shard");
assert.deepEqual([...combined].sort(), [...specs].sort());
for (const shard of shards) {
assert.ok(shard.length > 0, "no shard may be empty — Playwright fails a run with no matching specs");
}
});
test("the ignored spec list matches playwright.config.ts testIgnore", () => {
const config = readFileSync(playwrightConfig, "utf8");
const match = config.match(/testIgnore:\s*\[([^\]]*)\]/);
assert.ok(match, "expected a testIgnore array in playwright.config.ts");
const configured = [...match[1].matchAll(/"([^"]+)"/g)].map((entry) => entry[1]);
assert.deepEqual([...configured].sort(), [...IGNORED_SPECS].sort());
});
test("the duration manifest only names specs that still exist", () => {
const durations = loadShardDurations(durationsManifest);
assert.ok(Object.keys(durations).length > 0, "expected a populated duration manifest");
const specs = new Set(listE2eSpecs());
for (const file of Object.keys(durations)) {
assert.ok(specs.has(file), `duration manifest names a spec that no longer runs: ${file}`);
}
});
test("the weighted partition keeps the shards close to balanced", () => {
const durations = loadShardDurations(durationsManifest);
const specs = listE2eSpecs();
const weights = Array.from({ length: SHARD_COUNT }, (_, index) =>
selectE2eShard(specs, index, SHARD_COUNT, durations).reduce((sum, file) => sum + (durations[file] ?? 0), 0),
);
const heaviest = Math.max(...weights);
const total = weights.reduce((sum, weight) => sum + weight, 0);
// Round-robin/count-based sharding would strand the ~168s smoke-lab spec on
// one runner alongside other specs. Assert the weighted split stays within
// 15% of an even cut so a future spec-time regression surfaces here instead
// of on the PR critical path. A single indivisible spec (smoke-lab) can
// legitimately exceed the even cut on its own, so the bound is floored at
// the largest per-spec weight — the best any file-level partition can do.
const largestSpec = Math.max(...specs.map((file) => durations[file] ?? 0));
const bound = Math.max((total / SHARD_COUNT) * 1.15, largestSpec);
assert.ok(
heaviest <= bound,
`heaviest shard ${heaviest}ms exceeds the balance bound (${bound}ms)`,
);
});
test("shard arguments are validated", () => {
for (const args of [
["--shard-index", "2", "--shard-count", "2"],
["--shard-index", "-1", "--shard-count", "2"],
["--shard-index", "0", "--shard-count", "0"],
]) {
const result = spawnSync(process.execPath, [script, ...args], { cwd: repoRoot, encoding: "utf8" });
assert.notEqual(result.status, 0, `expected failure for ${args.join(" ")}`);
}
});
test("pr.yml calls the trusted PR workflow at an immutable SHA", () => {
assert.ok(readPinnedTrustedPrWorkflow().length > 0);
});
test("the trusted PR workflow keeps a stable aggregate check named e2e over the shard matrix", () => {
// Branch protection requires a check literally named `e2e`. The shards run
// as `e2e shard (n/3)`, so the aggregate job below is what keeps the
// required-check contract intact — same pattern as the `verify` aggregate.
const workflow = readPinnedTrustedPrWorkflow();
const jobs = new Map();
let current = null;
for (const line of workflow.split("\n")) {
const header = /^ {2}([A-Za-z0-9_-]+):\s*$/.exec(line);
if (header) {
current = header[1];
jobs.set(current, []);
continue;
}
if (current && /^\S/.test(line)) current = null;
if (current) jobs.get(current).push(line);
}
for (const [id, lines] of jobs) jobs.set(id, lines.join("\n"));
const aggregate = jobs.get("e2e");
assert.ok(aggregate, "pr-trusted.yml must define an `e2e` job to satisfy branch protection");
assert.match(aggregate, /^ {4}name: e2e$/m, "the aggregate job must be named exactly `e2e`");
assert.match(aggregate, /^ {4}if: \$\{\{ always\(\) \}\}$/m, "the aggregate must run even when a shard fails");
assert.match(
aggregate,
/^ {4}needs: \[gate, e2e_shards\]$/m,
"the aggregate must depend on the runner gate and shard matrix",
);
assert.match(
aggregate,
/test "\$E2E_SHARDS_RESULT" = "success"/,
"the aggregate must fail unless every shard succeeded",
);
const shards = jobs.get("e2e_shards");
assert.ok(shards, "pr-trusted.yml must define the `e2e_shards` matrix job");
const matrixEntries = [
...shards.matchAll(
/^ {10}- shard_index: (?<shardIndex>\d+)\n {12}shard_count: (?<shardCount>\d+)\n {12}shard_label: (?<shardLabel>\d+\/\d+)$/gm,
),
].map((match) => ({
shardIndex: Number(match.groups.shardIndex),
shardCount: Number(match.groups.shardCount),
shardLabel: match.groups.shardLabel,
}));
assert.equal(matrixEntries.length, SHARD_COUNT, "the shard matrix must define exactly SHARD_COUNT entries");
assert.deepEqual(
matrixEntries.map((entry) => entry.shardIndex).sort((a, b) => a - b),
Array.from({ length: SHARD_COUNT }, (_, index) => index),
"the shard matrix must define each shard index exactly once",
);
for (const entry of matrixEntries) {
assert.equal(entry.shardCount, SHARD_COUNT, "each shard matrix entry must use the same SHARD_COUNT");
assert.equal(entry.shardLabel, `${entry.shardIndex + 1}/${SHARD_COUNT}`, "each shard label must match its index");
}
});
test("the trusted PR workflow passes the shard's spec filter to Playwright without a literal --", () => {
// `pnpm run test:e2e -- $specs` forwards the literal separator to Playwright,
// so the specs after it are not applied as file filters.
const workflow = readPinnedTrustedPrWorkflow();
assert.ok(
!/pnpm run test:e2e --\s/.test(workflow),
"pr-trusted.yml must not insert a literal `--` between `pnpm run test:e2e` and the spec filter",
);
assert.match(
workflow,
/pnpm run test:e2e \$specs/,
"pr-trusted.yml e2e_shards must invoke `pnpm run test:e2e $specs`",
);
});
test("the trusted PR workflow regenerates stale stacked lockfiles", () => {
// Implementation PRs validate the workflow under development here. The
// caller remains pinned to the last merged trusted SHA until a separate
// activation PR advances it, so unmerged PR code never runs on trusted
// infrastructure.
const workflow = readFileSync(trustedPrWorkflow, "utf8");
assert.match(
workflow,
/policy:\n needs: \[gate\][\s\S]{0,160}timeout-minutes: 10/,
"the unconditional resolution step needs the same timeout headroom as the lockfile refresh workflow",
);
assert.match(
workflow,
/- name: Setup Node\.js\n uses: actions\/setup-node@[0-9a-f]+[^\n]*\n with:\n node-version: 24\n cache: pnpm/,
"the policy job must restore the pnpm cache before dependency resolution",
);
assert.match(
workflow,
/pnpm install --lockfile-only --ignore-scripts --no-frozen-lockfile/,
"the policy job must validate the complete merge tree instead of only the current PR layer",
);
assert.match(
workflow,
/cmp -s "\$RUNNER_TEMP\/pnpm-lock\.before\.yaml" pnpm-lock\.yaml/,
"the policy job must upload a lockfile only when regeneration changed it",
);
const restoreSteps = workflow.match(
/- name: Restore regenerated PR lockfile \(if policy uploaded one\)\n if: needs\.policy\.outputs\.lockfile_regenerated == '1'/g,
) ?? [];
assert.equal(restoreSteps.length, 6, "every downstream install job must restore a required regenerated artifact");
assert.doesNotMatch(
workflow,
/- name: Restore regenerated PR lockfile \(if policy uploaded one\)[\s\S]{0,220}continue-on-error:/,
"a missing artifact must fail after the policy job says it uploaded one",
);
});