Files
PaperClipAI/maps
Devin FoleyandPaperclip c5ca29dbef fix(claude): prepare compatible sandbox runtimes during onboarding (#17259)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip connects agent accounts and prepares their execution
environments.
> - A managed sandbox image can outlive the model defaults shipped by
the app.
> - Claude setup skipped installation whenever a CLI was already on
PATH.
> - The selected model then failed its minimum-version check after
sign-in succeeded.
> - This pull request prepares a compatible private CLI before testing
or running it.
> - Cloud onboarding also stops asking customers to run inaccessible
shell commands.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A new managed Cloud stack completed Claude subscription sign-in. Its
environment test then failed because the snapshot contained Claude Code
2.1.263, while the selected `claude-opus-5-5` model requires 2.1.280.
The screen displayed Manual debug commands that a hosted customer cannot
run.

**Expected behavior**

Paperclip prepares its managed runtime before testing the selected
account. A stale image CLI does not require the customer to upgrade a
server package. Failed preparation still blocks hiring. Cloud does not
display manual shell debugging.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start a managed sandbox with Claude Code 2.1.263 on PATH.
2. Connect a Claude subscription and select `claude-opus-5-5` on the CLI
lane.
3. Connect the agent. Installation is skipped because the command
exists, then the version gate blocks the hello test.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Source baseline: `6204239cfc8c3be79fc185cf3f468ebaa0ab1e3e`.

**Deployment mode**

Authenticated managed Cloud with a Daytona named snapshot. The
correction also applies to the default CLI in other managed sandbox
transports.

Related work: Refs #14993 sets model/runtime requirements; Refs #15993
changes native defaults on qualified targets. Neither prepares an
outdated default sandbox CLI on this path. Searches found no open
duplicate.

## What Changed

- Check the actual default CLI against the selected model's existing
minimum version.
- When a sandbox's default command is outdated, install the exact
required npm package into a private versioned workspace prefix. Reuse a
compatible private installation. Keep the image's global CLI intact.
- Verify the private executable and use that same command for the
account hello test and normal CLI runs, with matching command metadata.
Probe effort support after preparing that executable so the chosen
effort is retained. Keep the model, account, engine and permissions
unchanged.
- Return safe preparation checks to environment tests and normal run
logs, distinguishing installation failure causes without returning raw
installer output or credential-bearing URLs.
- Exclude provider and Paperclip credentials from the installer
environment. Preserve the existing failing version gate if installation
or verification cannot succeed. Local, SSH and explicit custom commands
remain operator-managed.
- Hide Manual debug and legacy operator check hints on Cloud and while
deployment metadata is unknown; preserve check messages and details.
Retain self-hosted help and the detailed failed checks. Cloud copy asks
for a retry instead of asking the customer to repair the environment.
- Add subprocess-backed runtime controls, an account-probe regression
and mounted Cloud/self-hosted wizard controls. Update development
guidance and the affected capability maps.

## Verification

- Passed all Claude source suites and the server Claude execution suite
on head `c941ae44c22d8dafec0df033a129e39ce4ebd966`: **412 passed**, one
existing opt-in test skipped. These include the new command/effort
ordering, safe installer diagnostics, environment forwarding and run-log
regressions.
- On final head `0ecae0e9304f495a57524158b3700b8e9bc21cb8`, passed **208
tests** across all 174 mounted onboarding wizard tests and 34 Claude
execution tests. The failure fixture includes the real command-bearing
hint, and execution asserts both metadata command fields agree.
- Passed `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `pnpm check:token-gates`,
`node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check`. Full typecheck and
build were repeated successfully on final head
`0ecae0e9304f495a57524158b3700b8e9bc21cb8`. [Latest-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39879208694)
is green: 54 checks passed and two skipped, including browser E2E and
serialized database suites.
- The new runtime controls execute real subprocesses with a controlled
installer. They cover an old CLI, an already compatible CLI, failed or
ineffective installation, local/custom commands, and an unknown version.
The probe regression asserts that the hello call uses the private
executable.
- A separate non-root local subprocess check installed the real npm
`@anthropic-ai/claude-code@2.1.280` package. Its private command
reported 2.1.280, the simulated image CLI remained 2.1.263, and a second
preparation reused the private copy. This ran on macOS ARM64. It did not
use a provider account, send a model prompt, or prove live Daytona
behavior.
- Attempted `pnpm test:run`. Embedded PostgreSQL initialization failed
after five attempts on this Mac with `Postgres init script exited with
code null`. The unchanged native-session database cases then failed.
Stopped only that full-suite process tree after recording the repeated
startup failure. No full local-suite pass is claimed; Linux CI must
cover those tests.
- The first new subprocess fixture had a quoting syntax error. It was
corrected before the passing focused runs. The one-off real-package
script first required an ESM extension correction, then passed. Logs
retain both attempts. A new execution assertion initially inspected the
final sandbox cleanup shell instead of the launched command; it now
checks execution metadata. A broader directory selection also picked up
generated `dist` tests whose Markdown fixtures are not copied by the
build (two ENOENT failures). The explicit source-suite run above passes;
no generated-test pass is claimed.
- Apex review: **5/5**, reviewed final head
`0ecae0e9304f495a57524158b3700b8e9bc21cb8`, all five earlier findings
addressed and resolved, no new findings.
- Merge, deployment and a fresh live Cloud subscription test are still
required. No customer account or production runtime was changed by this
branch.

## Risks

- An outdated sandbox needs npm registry access and up to 120 seconds
for one bounded installation attempt. A failed or unverified install
continues to block execution.
- The versioned package uses sandbox workspace storage. Compatible
cached copies avoid repeat installation within that workspace. Existing
runtime cleanup and sandbox lifecycle still apply.
- The compatible version comes from the adapter's existing model-version
contract. This does not add a model fallback or change the selected
execution engine.
- No schema, credential, permission, workflow or lockfile change.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with implementation and
verification. The exact serving model ID and context-window limit are
not exposed in this session. Capabilities used: code editing, shell
execution, API inspection and test execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-22 18:44:53 -07:00
..

Paperclip maps

The maps describe the same capabilities from two perspectives:

  • Feature map: what a person can do, where to reach it, and how to verify the user journey. Preserve its Poteto format.
  • Agent access map: the APIs and agent entry points for those capabilities, their permission boundaries, and access verification.

These are sibling directories under maps/. Each feature file has a same-named agent access companion. Reuse the product map's sub-feature IDs, so tasks/create identifies the same capability in both maps. Product behavior remains governed by the implementation spec; a map cannot grant authority or redefine a permission denial as success.

Capability identifiers

The feature ID is the recipe filename without .md, such as onboarding. The full capability ID joins that feature ID and a Sub-features key with /: the company key in feature-map/onboarding.md is onboarding/company. Its agent-access-map/onboarding.md companion uses the same local company key. The feature-map index lists the existing feature and full capability IDs.

Each child page states Feature ID: `onboarding`. after its introduction or product-map link. In feature recipes, show the full ID beside the parsed local key: - `company`: `onboarding/company` — create a company. In access companions and Storybook verification guidance, keep the existing local heading and put Capability ID: `onboarding/company`. beneath it. These labels make the existing identifiers visible without changing keys, anchors, or ID generation.

Use full capability IDs in cross-feature references, Storybook annotations, tests, issues, PRs, and verification evidence. Both segments use lowercase letters, digits, and hyphens. Keep filenames and keys stable when display titles or navigation labels change; renaming either changes the capability ID.

Entry-point IDs describe a surface, such as web-wizard, and are scoped to their recipe. Reference them with a recipe link, such as onboarding.md#web-wizard, and record the capability exercised separately. Navigation section labels are not capability IDs. See IDs and references for examples.

Access contract

Every business operation needs both an API and a usable agent entry point for an actor authorized to perform it. A dedicated tool is optional when REST, the CLI, an assigned MCP client, or native search_api / call_api already provides the operation. Record which agent surfaces actually have that path; an installed CLI or optional MCP package cannot be assumed available to every native/remote run.

Track these independently:

Dimension Values and meaning
API present, missing, not-applicable, or unreviewed. Use exact methods/paths; distinguish protocols from REST.
Agent access available, partial, missing, restricted, operator-only, not-applicable, or unreviewed. Name the supported surface and actual entry point.
Policy Actor, action/grant, company/resource/ownership scope, responsible-user intersection, run requirements, work modes, and gates relevant to the operation.
Evidence source-only, verified, failed, blocked, or not-run. Source presence and successful board calls are not agent verification.
Review depth baseline records representative operations and known gaps; operation-reviewed enumerates the capability's meaningful operations and their individual access contracts.

Broad capabilities such as task properties must be split into operations before they count as operation-reviewed: renaming, metadata edits, assignment, dependencies, and lifecycle changes can use different tools and permission rules. An available read path cannot certify a write path. List/get/create/update/delete, execution/control, credential handling, and resolution are separate where their authority or transport differs. Do not duplicate request schemas from OpenAPI.

Exceptions and restrictions

Presentation-only state, static developer fixtures, and pre-start/local operator work may use not-applicable for a domain API, with a concrete reason and the existing local path. When a capability combines shared data with presentation, split the operations: browser recents do not exempt resource lookup from API coverage. Promoting local state to a shared feature requires revisiting the entry.

A board-only endpoint is restricted for agent identity, not an automatic exception or a missing API. Cite the enforced policy and record whether the agent can request the authorized human's action and observe its result. An unresolved delegation question remains in Gaps. Company access, a job title, a personal assistant's OAuth grant, or an accepted interaction does not grant board identity. Keep budget, approval, secret and execution authority intact.

Check actual route/service authorization and production tool admission. OpenAPI actor labels and scenario/evaluation tool declarations are supporting metadata; record disagreements rather than using them as proof of access. Native API fallback restrictions, tool field/scope limits, and rollout settings are part of the agent path, even when a legacy agent can call the REST endpoint directly.

Companion file format

Each agent-access-map/<area>.md has an H1, a relative link to its product file, and its feature ID, followed by one H2 backticked local key per product sub-feature. Each capability starts with its full capability ID and contains these fields:

  • Review: baseline or operation-reviewed.
  • API: presence state and exact operation IDs, or a reasoned exception.
  • Agent access: availability state and concrete entry points by surface.
  • Policy: relevant permission and runtime boundaries, with source references.
  • Evidence: evidence state, reviewed commit and sources or executed proof.
  • Verification: allowed/denied assertions and observable result; record what has actually run separately from the proposed recipe.
  • Gaps: missing APIs/paths, discovery drift, unreviewed operations or policy decisions; use none only for the enumerated scope that was reviewed.

For an operation-reviewed capability, use H3 backticked operation IDs and repeat API, Agent access, Policy, Evidence, Verification and Gaps for each operation. Use small operation names such as create, update, read, or run-now. The enclosing capability has Review: operation-reviewed only after its meaningful operations have been enumerated. The following excerpt shows one operation; include the others before using that review label:

## `definition`

Review: `operation-reviewed`.

### `create`

API: `present` — POST /api/companies/{companyId}/routines.
Agent access: `available` — agent REST, CLI routine create and native call_api
under the enabled rollout and active-run/mode gates.
Policy: same company; assigneeAgentId must be the calling agent; cite the
routine authorization and native API policy sources.
Evidence: `source-only` — reviewed commit and source links; no live proof.
Verification: `not-run` — create an owned routine; reject assignment to another
agent; inspect saved configuration, attribution and retry behavior.
Gaps: verify ownership and responsible-user resolution with a permitted agent
context; source presence alone does not qualify this operation.

Keeping the maps synchronized

When a change adds/removes a capability or changes its behavior, API, permission, tool binding, CLI support, or work mode, update the affected companion and product recipe as appropriate in the same change. Preserve IDs across renames where the capability is unchanged; update the affected cross-links together. Indexes discover recipes automatically. An API-only change may update the companion without rewriting unchanged user instructions.

maintain-verification-skill owns reconciliation of both maps. It follows changed source and authorization, checks real agent reachability, and records product gaps without implementing them during a maintenance pass. The creation skill uses this structure. verify-paperclip consumes the relevant recipes and reports evidence/drift; map editing belongs to maintenance.

Run the structural check after map changes:

node scripts/check-maps.mjs

It checks paired areas/IDs, navigation metadata, required fields, and local references. It does not certify endpoint authorization, production bindings, operation completeness, or live behavior. Source audits must check those against the existing API and tool contracts; avoid a second schema catalog or runtime.

For live access proof, use Paperclip's existing API/runner/MCP fixtures or an owned isolated instance. Use the actual agent identity, target and work mode. Assert the allowed result and relevant denial (another company/private resource, wrong owner, missing grant, invalid run, restricted mode or resolver). Mutations also need persisted state/attribution and retry behavior. Capture evidence using the existing artifact workflow; keep executed run results separate from generated maps/generated/coverage.json, which lists page references.

Local authorship and generated indexes

Change only the recipes, access contracts and stories whose behavior or intent changed. Feature recipes own navigation metadata; stories own small parameters.paperclip annotations. Keep the feature-map README's readable ID index aligned with those sources; it does not register entries for generation. Do not refresh counts in shared READMEs, inventories, fingerprints or review journals.

node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs validates and generates aggregate navigation, Storybook data, verification routes and the page inventory. All outputs live in ignored maps/generated/, ui/storybook/generated/, and the ignored Storybook preview.tsx wrapper. Start/build and UI typechecking generate their own inputs. A clean merged checkout therefore assembles both branches' changes automatically.

Git provides history and diffs. PRs, issues and CI artifacts retain review/run evidence for the named revision. Capability associations do not create whole-file review dependencies. Keep durable scenario limits in the affected recipe or story.