mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-20 15:09:57 +02:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
c30fb7d2b7
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Core starts Runners in local, SSH, and sandbox environments. > - Coding runs, Dot runs, and setup probes repeat connection setup code. > - These paths must keep the same preparation, authentication, and cleanup order. > - This pull request gives them one execution lifecycle contract and one server connection driver. > - Core keeps the existing PRP control plane after connection. > - The benefit is one place to maintain environment routing before adding another execution provider. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Runner environment preparation and connection setup across local, SSH, and sandbox execution. **Current behavior** The coding transport owns the environment hook type. Dot borrows that type. The server repeats connection selection, registration, ingress activation, and release in task execution and setup probes. Changes to one path can miss another path. **Proposed behavior** Use a shared `RunnerExecutionDriver` contract. Route built-in task execution and remote setup probes through `createNativeRunnerExecutionDriver`. Keep provider session setup, process supervision, PRP commands, and recovery logic on their existing paths. **Reason and benefit** Environment code can prepare resources and provide a connection without adding another PRP execution path. The same driver preserves local loopback, remote outbound WSS, and authorized sandbox ingress. **Breaking changes** None intended. Existing flat SDK options remain compatible. This is an in-process contract. It does not add a plugin wire contract or Launcher APIs. **Additional context** Related: #15406 proposes plugin-provided Runner execution. This change starts from `master` and does not depend on that PR. It extracts the existing lifecycle before adding another provider. Related: #16125 covers remote environment support for external adapters; this PR does not implement that feature. ## What Changed - Extract and export `RunnerExecutionDriver` from the coding transport. Use it for coding and Dot options. - Share server connection negotiation across coding runs, Dot runs, and remote setup probes. - Preserve outbound validation before staging, capability checks before ingress, process dispatch before ingress connection, and verified process readiness. - Preserve warm run registration, restart guards, checkpoint hooks, and cleanup ownership. - Add 13 focused driver tests and document the lifecycle boundary. ## Verification - Targeted server execution and recovery tests: 728 passed, 35 skipped. These cover `native-session-executor`, `native-ssh-command-runner`, the new driver, warm restart transitions, and Runner restart recovery. - Targeted setup and driver tests: 109 passed after the review fix. Twelve driver tests overlap with the preceding count. The added test verifies that failed CA staging cannot leave a PRP route behind. - Runner connectivity tests: 11 passed. - Runner package lifecycle tests: 287 passed across coding transport, Dot, restart continuation, and settlement. These exercised the compiled Rust Runner. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `git diff --check`: passed. Local secret-pattern scan: clear. - The PRP transport runtime and remote process launcher remain unchanged. A byte comparison against the base confirmed this. - CI passed on `b10789dfce30a837ce890f44e352064c7a74366f`: all 55 active checks are green, including the full test shards, Runner checks, browser tests, typecheck, build, and aggregate gate. Greptile scored this commit 5/5 with no unresolved findings. - An earlier broad local shard run was not green: 34,888 passed, 12 failed, and 4,125 skipped. Failures were ten timeouts and two Git fixture assertions affected by local `init.defaultBranch=main`. Isolated retry passed all six non-route timeout suites (427 tests), two route suites, and both Git assertions with a test-process-only `init.defaultBranch=master`. The agent live-run route retry still timed out. No unrelated source changes were made. Further broad local runs were stopped at the user's request. Targeted commands: ```sh cd server node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-ssh-command-runner.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-runner-execution-driver.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-warm-transition-restart.integration.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-runner-restart-recovery.integration.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run src/services/native-runtime/setup-readiness.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-runner-execution-driver.test.ts --config vitest.config.ts cd ../packages/paperclip-runner node ../../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts src/drivers/dot/runnerd-dot-driver.test.ts src/live/runnerd-restart-continuation.test.ts src/live/runnerd-codex-transport-settlement.test.ts --maxWorkers=2 cd ../.. node node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run packages/adapter-utils/src/runner-connectivity.test.ts ``` ## Risks - Startup ordering and connection cleanup are sensitive. Focused tests cover local registration, outbound validation, CA mapping, ingress ordering, release, and warm authority guards. - No live SSH host or sandbox provider was used. Existing mocked remote tests and real local Runner tests passed. - No database, PRP wire protocol, or Launcher API changes are included. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex, with tool use and code execution. The served model variant and context window were not exposed to this task. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run the stated targeted tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>