mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-13 15:55:46 +01:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
c28f8fc341
The scripted repeat "Yes, go ahead with that." was sent after the CEO's reply
ended with a new offer ("Say the word when you want it moved into todo and
executed."). The CEO reasonably read the bare yes as accepting that offer,
moved the created task to todo, and the assignment wake made a third run over
the declared bound of two. The repeat no longer tested repeating the same
acceptance.
The person's second message now names the proposal card they already accepted
by its visible title, so it can only mean the original proposal; it says
nothing about how to handle the repeat. The grader checks the exact scripted
second message (a harness literal, not model output) and still requires one
task, still in backlog, one decision bound to the first reply, and two runs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>