<!-- entire-trail-link-start --> https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/1/changes/paperclip/1 <!-- entire-trail-link-end --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their execution environments. > - New agent setup saves an inactive agent before model connection tests. > - Some plugins need that agent to prepare its execution resource. > - The wizard tested without the agent ID, while the setup hold prevented preparation. > - Environment changes also discarded the selected model account. > - This change prepares the saved draft during setup and keeps normal execution held. > - Users can test the prepared resource before they finish hiring. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An agent-owned plugin environment could not acquire a test lease during hiring. Changing environments also returned the user to Connect and cleared the selected account. **Expected behavior** Keep the selected account, invalidate its test, and prepare the saved agent resource in the background. Test that same agent before finishing setup. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a new Claude or Codex agent and select a saved account. 2. Change to an agent-owned plugin environment. 3. Try to finish setup or reconnect the account. Related: #17750 defers probes until after hire submission. This change implements preparation during the wizard instead. The related PR search and ROADMAP review found no other implementation of this setup preparation path. ## What Changed - Add the optional `requiresAgent` driver declaration. Require agent lifecycle participation when it is set. - Prepare saved drafts on creation or environment changes. Keep the setup hold and wait in `verifying` without background verification scans. - Bind tests to the saved agent. Return a warning without allocating a lease when the required agent is absent or still preparing. - Preserve the account and configuration step when the environment changes. Save the selection and invalidate the old test. - Show active preparation and support authorized retries. Keep approval, company, budget, and normal task admission controls. - Document the contract and cover lifecycle, lease, manifest, and wizard behavior. ## Verification - Server and UI TypeScript checks passed. - 112 wizard and setup helper tests passed. The shared manifest suite passed. - 123 lifecycle, policy, lease, and environment-test API cases passed after the approval-gate fix. The diagnostic and driver suites and all 80 agent adapter route tests also passed. - Token gates, module boundaries, map validation, and whitespace checks passed. - All 66 lifecycle/policy cases passed after the stopping-draft permission fix. The new real-DB route case verifies creator success, other-creator denial, and refusal to complete a hire while stopping. - Full workspace typecheck and build were attempted. Both stop at the unchanged Rust Runner step because Cargo is not installed on this host. - CI on43be3c93dpassed all automated checks, including full test shards, typecheck, build, Rust checks, browser suites, and canary checks: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40368174530. - The full local repository test command was started. Two unchanged workspace tests assume Git's initial branch is master; this host defaults to main. Both fail in isolation under the host default and pass with process-scoped init.defaultBranch=master. The broad run was stopped after those confirmed fixture failures; CI supplies the full clean check. - Early new-test failures were fixture collisions and an unscoped sweep assertion; the fixtures and assertion were corrected. One route-suite load raced with SDK output regeneration; rebuilding first and running the suite afterward passed. - Initial CI exposed a route mock missing the new prerequisite lookup. The fixture was updated and a real HTTP no-lease case was added; all 54 cases in that route suite pass. Security review identified allocation before required approval; the new approval gate and its tests address it. - CI on50b5a08afreported 32 of 33 expected calls in the unchanged cleanup-history scheduling test. Its isolated case passed locally without cleanup-code changes; the original failure remains recorded and the final CI run passes on the current head. - Standard Greptile reviewed43be3c93dat 5/5. A subsequent deeper review identified runner selection, stale detail reads, error retention, and test file size issues; 70343387b addresses all four with resolved threads. Standard review returned 5/5 on that commit and again on rebased headfda42c5ab. The rebase preserves master's new managed environment skill declarations alongside requiresAgent. Full CI onfda42c5abpasses: 55 successful checks, two intentional skips, no failures. Run: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40405121641. - After those fixes, 133 UI tests and 61 lifecycle/policy cases pass; all eight focused UI regressions fail against the previous implementation and pass with the fix. Token, map, and whitespace gates pass. The stale-read fixture initially omitted the setup URL because navigation is mocked; following the URL activates the real detail query and reproduces the race. - UI TypeScript passes. This host's server dependency links now point to a separate scratch checkout lacking requiresAgent, so the ordinary server check reports that missing property. A no-emit check pinned to this branch's shared declarations passes; it disables declaration generation and supplies explicit local type roots. The first temporary configuration lacked those type roots; the corrected configuration passes. CI remains the full workspace verification. - After rebasing onto8373d7867, all 133 UI, 61 lifecycle/policy, and 44 manifest cases pass again, as do UI TypeScript, token, map, and whitespace checks. The server no-emit check now hits three mismatched SDK/Runner declarations from the scratch dependency links; these are outside this change. Full CI builds the complete dependency set. - Review cycle: the first Apex review scored 3/5 with four findings. All were fixed together, the branch was rebased to resolve a schema conflict, full CI and standard Greptile passed, and a second Apex review returned 5/5 onfda42c5abwith zero new comments. All six review threads are resolved, and the PR is conflict-free. Review: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17761#issuecomment-6422635718. - No live provider resource was created and no deployment was performed. ## Risks Plugins must opt in and ship a compatible declaration. Companies requiring hire approval keep drafts paused and defer allocation and verification until approval. Other companies prepare drafts during the wizard under their existing agent-creation authority; the setup hold still blocks ordinary work. Preparation uses existing lifecycle ownership, retry, and cleanup paths. The open wizard polls only while preparation or stopping is active. No database migration is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context window size are not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR using the bug report fields - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run the targeted tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [x] All Paperclip gates are green — 55 successful checks and two intentional skips onfda42c5ab- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
19 KiB
navigation
| navigation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hiring, configuration, and organization
Operators hire agents, configure their identity and instructions, assign reporting relationships, and manage their lifecycle. Built-in agents have their own setup and lifecycle constraints.
Feature ID: agents.
Implementation: hiring, configuration, organization.
Agent access: companion.
Sub-features
hire:agents/hire— choose identity, harness, model, and required account settings; edit reporting relationships through the agent configuration afterward.grok-bot:agents/grok-bot— experimental existing-Bot agent setup through remote OAuth, routine credentials, and an authenticated two-way challenge; current contact, stop and explicit recovery.instructions:agents/instructions— edit agent configuration and instruction files with durable revisions.organization:agents/organization— inspect and change reporting relationships through supported controls.primary-agent:agents/primary-agent— choose a personal primary agent for the company, confirm replacement, and inspect its roster/sidebar and task/chat defaults.lifecycle:agents/lifecycle— pause/resume or retire an agent while preserving history.built-in:agents/built-in— configure required agents without treating them as ordinary removable hires.api-keys:agents/api-keys— create and inspect named agent credentials, copy a new token once, and revoke it without changing agent identity.managed-agent-setup:agents/managed-agent-setup— probe, create, or adopt a qualified Anthropic managed-agent profile with pinned provider resources and retention acknowledgement.
How to get to it (user POV)
hire-agent
Use New agent from the roster or /agents/new.
Submitting the name creates an inactive record before adapter selection or account setup. A name-only draft returns to adapter selection when reopened. Save & exit keeps its configuration; Finish setup on the agent returns to the same record. Final submission requests approval when required, then follows the existing preparation and verification lifecycle.
Agent-owned plugin environments prepare the saved draft in the background when
their driver declares requiresAgent. The draft waits in verifying with its
setup hold until hiring finishes. Changing environments keeps the selected
account and Configure step, saves the selection, and invalidates its test.
Preparation and failed-save retries remain visible without reconnecting.
Companies requiring hire approval save the account with pending verification;
resource allocation waits for approval.
agent-configuration
Open /agents/:agentId and the configuration/instruction surfaces it exposes.
For a low-trust agent, open Permissions / Trust → Allowed projects. An operator with agent-management permission can select additional projects and explicitly save them. Existing projects and other containment restrictions remain intact. Cancel discards the draft; a failed save retains it. Reload to verify persistence. This does not start or retry a task.
In /agents/all, select roster checkboxes and choose Edit connection & model.
A mixed selection offers one action per harness. Each field is opt-in. The editor
previews each changed value and excludes agents already at the target value.
Models must be compatible with every selected connection. Failed writes show
per-agent errors; Retry touches only the remaining agents. Connection pools and
externally managed agents are not editable through this shortcut.
Verify connection-only, model-only, both fields, mixed-harness selection, hidden selections, no-op counts, incompatible models, partial failure and retry. Reload the roster and compare stored settings, including unrelated heartbeat and adapter fields. A concurrent configuration edit must return a conflict. Shared runtime validation, access checks, revisions and audit logging still apply. Live runs retain their existing settings; model changes can reset saved sessions. Connection adoption can require an explicit reset of existing sessions.
organization
Use the roster’s organization view; /org redirects to the roster in the streamlined shell.
personal-primary-agent
Open an agent profile and choose Set as my primary. Inspect its crown on the profile/roster and its position in the Agents sidebar, then open a new task or Chat.
agent-api-keys
Open /agents/:agentId/api-keys → API Keys with an authenticated person who can manage agents. The operator CLI also supports paperclipai token agent create -C <company-id> --agent <agent-id> --name <label>, token agent list -C <company-id> --agent <agent-id>, and token agent revoke <key-id> -C <company-id> --agent <agent-id>.
managed-agent-cli
Use the operator command paperclipai managed-agent setup --company-id <company-id> --profile-key <key> --display-name <name> --api-key-secret-id <company-secret-id> --acknowledge-retention --json. Supply ANTHROPIC_API_KEY through the process environment. Use --agent-id, --agent-version, and --environment-id to adopt resources, or --probe for provider reads without profile persistence. The optional session-list cost ceiling is --max-session-list-cost-usd.
Driving it with Playwright and the Paperclip CLI
Preconditions: follow the baseline. Use a disposable company and supported adapter; hiring may require a formal approval.
hire-agent
Automated: new agent page and configuration form cover mocked UI behavior.
For an agent-owned plugin environment, verify preparation before connecting, same-agent probes, account preservation after an environment change, failed selection-save retry, and switching back while the computer stops. Confirm the setup hold still blocks ordinary work and API key creation before finishing. The setup lifecycle tests exercise durable transitions with synthetic plugin resources; they do not prove live VM provisioning.
Manual: Hire an agent with a distinct name and role. Complete any required approval, reload the roster, and open its configuration. Confirm manager, adapter, and model persisted; run a small task to prove execution readiness.
For a new Codex hire, choose the Codex harness. Automatic selection uses Paperclip Runner on a qualified selected target; Advanced offers an explicit Legacy runner override. Record the persisted runner and underlying harness, rather than treating the displayed Codex name as execution proof. See runtime selection and validation and target qualification.
Repeat with an explicit Legacy Codex hire. If approval is required, compare its reviewed execution configuration before and after restart and activation; approval must retain the reviewed runner. Test an existing Legacy and native agent through an unrelated edit, reload and restart: neither is automatically upgraded.
Creation defaults also apply to API/CLI hires, built-ins, plugins and new team imports. Exports preserve resolved execution choices; a package without a runner choice uses the new-agent default, while updating an existing same-harness agent preserves its execution. For a native Codex import, edit a model or account binding and verify unchanged runtime settings survive; an explicit clear must stay cleared. Use the portability recipe for package preparation and boundaries.
For Claude Code on qualified macOS or GNU/Linux x64/ARM64, submit without a
runner override and inspect
saved configuration: paperclip_runner, provider: acpx, acpxAgent: claude,
and ordinary model claude-opus-5-5. The Advanced runner selector can explicitly
choose Legacy. Keep explicit model/account choices and saved runners on edits.
Verify useful output and a follow-up after a controller restart; setup success
alone does not establish session continuity. Unsupported architectures/libc and unknown environment qualification retain
Legacy. Darwin SSH also defaults to Legacy until automatic matching assets are
qualified; explicit matching native assets and saved native configurations remain
supported. Linux ARM64 cloud-image production remains deferred.
The current hiring wizard assigns the first hire CEO and subsequent hires General reporting to the CEO. Change manager/role afterward through supported configuration. Process/HTTP agents can be created through API/CLI but are excluded from the hiring picker; API fixture creation does not prove this UI journey.
agent-configuration
Automated: instruction service and instruction revisions cover file/revision contracts.
The AI account field regression checks duplicate provider names, account identity in choices and adoption confirmation, the exact selected grant, and disabled unavailable accounts with authorized metadata fixtures. Manually compare a personal API key and shared subscription with the same name in Harness / Runtime. Confirm their method, scope and available identity before saving. Reload the saved choice and verify the next eligible task uses it; labels alone do not establish credential validity or change account access.
Manual: Save a harmless instruction edit, reload, and verify its revision and effect in the next eligible run. Pause and resume the disposable agent; confirm pause prevents new work and does not erase previous runs.
For failed setup, use an unavailable model or invalid command on a disposable agent. Confirm the profile names the failed verification step and gives a relevant action. Check that it explains automatic retry and offers Retry now. Fix the configuration, retry, and reload; the failure must disappear only after readiness commits. Provider output and credentials must not appear in the lifecycle message.
An explicit runner change is a configuration change, with normal revisions and session invalidation. Obsolete Claude tuning options (including maxTurnsPerRun) are ignored with a field-specific warning; permission, network, filesystem and command incompatibilities still produce an error. Selecting another runner must not silently discard security settings or change an active run's recorded execution. Keep runner choice in Advanced and verify the next eligible run separately from historical transcripts.
Existing legacy Claude and Codex agents on qualified default environments, or
probe-capable Daytona snapshots / immutable sandbox images, show Upgrade runner above their configuration. Verify a company owner with agents:configure and no instance-admin role can qualify the saved computer and upgrade. A caller without configuration permission must be denied before a probe starts. Exercise that action with
pending edits and an environment-variable draft. An unsaved change to a different
effective computer must disable the action and explain that the computer change
must be saved first; restoring the saved target must re-enable it. Reopen the page and compare the
saved harness, model, account bindings, instructions, and run policy. Check a
saved maxTurnsPerRun: 1000: upgrade must warn and remove it. Test an initially
unqualified Daytona Paperclip Computer: click must probe, record qualification,
refresh availability, and only then save. A failed probe or changed selection must
leave the agent on Legacy. Check a rejected permission setting, repair it, and retry. Verify a real task before
and after migration, including its output, preserved history, and fresh session.
The notice must stay absent for native agents, other harnesses, and unsupported
targets. Discovery failure must not imply that an upgrade is available.
Navigate to another agent while an upgrade is pending. Its result must stay with
the original agent, without showing success on the new page or redirecting back.
Focused coverage: save receipt
and configuration form.
Storybook: Runner upgrade mounts the production page and shell with mutable HTTP fixtures for both harnesses, pending, failure/retry, incompatible settings, repair, native/unsupported states, and mobile/light presentation. Fixture success does not establish real migration or provider execution.
organization
Automated: org chart is component evidence. Built-in setup also has configuration modal tests.
Manual: Inspect a manager and report, change the relationship through the offered controls, and reload both views. Exercise a rejected invalid relationship. Configure a built-in agent and verify it retains its required identity and restrictions.
personal-primary-agent
Automated: primary-agent context and primary-agent routes cover selection, company/user scope, and request contracts.
Manual: Select an available agent, reload, and inspect the retained personal choice. Replace it and verify confirmation is required. Leave or terminate the selected agent through permitted controls and inspect the unavailable/cleared state. Switch company/user to check isolation. Open a task and Chat with a valid draft or recent selection; verify those explicit choices take precedence over the primary fallback. Opening Chat must not start execution.
agent-api-keys
Automated: CLI token tests mock create/list/revoke. Cross-tenant routes, agent permissions, and authentication middleware cover company/key ownership, management permission, responsible-user binding, and denial. They do not prove a browser-created key working against a live instance.
Manual: As an authenticated person with agents:create, create a named key for an eligible disposable agent and copy it privately from the once-only display. Make a harmless same-company agent request with that bearer, then reload the Keys tab and verify only metadata remains. Revoke the key through UI or CLI, reload, and retry the exact same bearer: authentication must fail. Inspect key-created/key-revoked activity without token values. Test a board person lacking agent-management permission, an agent caller, another company’s agent, a different agent’s key ID, and a pending-approval/terminated target. A created key without a real responsible-user binding is a failed acceptance prerequisite, not a working credential.
Sources: Keys tab, key routes, key service, authentication, and CLI token commands.
managed-agent-cli
Automated: Managed-agent CLI uses mocked provider/API responses. Profile route authorization and remote profiles cover actor/company checks and qualification. They do not establish provider provisioning or a useful managed task.
Manual: Start with known adopted provider IDs in an authorized disposable provider account. Run --probe and verify only provider reads: no resources are created and no Paperclip profile is written. Reject unsafe tools/network/package configuration, an unsupported model, duplicate profile matches, a missing retention acknowledgement, and a malformed secret UUID. During persistence, reject missing, inactive, or foreign-company secret references. Then create or adopt a locked profile in a disposable company; inspect its pinned version, model, environment, retention attestation, and cost ceiling through the profile API. Repeat setup and verify resource reuse. Reject viewer/agent writes and foreign-company references. Qualify useful task execution separately through the runtime recipe; a successful probe is not execution acceptance.
Sources: Managed-agent CLI, profile routes, profile service, and runtime validation.
Gotchas
-
Managed-agent probing is read-only at the provider and does not persist a Paperclip profile. The explicit retention acknowledgement remains required even for probe.
-
Agent keys, human CLI tokens, and personal assistant OAuth grants are different credentials. Never include a key’s plaintext token in screenshots, logs, or verification artifacts.
-
A roster entry is not proof of an authenticated or invokable adapter.
-
Pending hires may live in approval/task surfaces rather than the active roster.
-
Skill and tool grants are separate: see skills and app permissions.
-
A personal primary agent is a per-user/company preference. It does not change reporting lines, stars, permissions, or another person's primary agent.
connect-grok-bot
Choose Invite an external agent → Grok Bot, identify the Bot by its desktop name, connect its remote MCP plugin, configure a webhook-only routine, and verify delivery plus authenticated reply. Save & exit resumes the same agent. Keep pairing codes in browser authorization and routine credentials in Paperclip’s fields. A working Bot web URL is not required.
Prerequisites: authenticated public HTTPS, Assistant connections (MCP), Paperclip Runner and Grok Bot experimental settings. Cloud uses its normal managed Runner environment. Provider usage is unknown. Routine uncertainty blocks new assignments until explicit inspection and recovery; stopping work revokes Paperclip authority without confirming remote termination.
Evidence: source implementation and focused protocol tests; real provider assigned/proactive workflows and deployed managed acceptance remain release gates.
Documentation scope: Agents, organization, and runtime setup
Per-harness/model/account capabilities, every instruction-file error, and complete built-in-agent lifecycle variants remain separate qualification matrices.