## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The runner package already provides the production protocol and execution spine. > - Contributors still need stable SDK surfaces, deterministic test tools, and local inspection tools. > - Those surfaces share generated contracts and must change as one package boundary. > - This pull request adds the package-local SDK, labs, examples, and drift checks. > - The benefit is a reviewable developer platform that does not change application execution selection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** `packages/paperclip-runner` — runner SDK, conformance tools, and developer tooling. **Problem or motivation** The production runner spine is present, but package consumers cannot build deterministic integrations, inspect sessions, or verify provider-neutral behavior through supported surfaces. **Proposed solution** Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, scenario, conformance, and evaluation surfaces. Add generated contract inventories and package-local verification scripts. Keep production application routing unchanged. **Alternatives considered** We considered splitting each generated catalog, SDK surface, and demo into separate pull requests. Those changes share exports, fixtures, and drift gates. Splitting them would create intermediate package states that do not build. **Roadmap alignment** No overlapping item appears in `ROADMAP.md`. This work extends the runner package that is already on `master`. ## What Changed - Add browser, React, standalone, live-session, and issue-thread SDK surfaces. - Add deterministic mock control-plane, scenario, conformance, replay, and evaluation tools. - Add bounded Codex, OpenCode, and ACPX development transports and fixtures. - Keep deferred managed-provider execution fail-closed. Persisted compatibility data remains readable. - Add generated capability inventories with their source files and drift checks. - Add examples, package documentation, browser checks, and clean-consumer checks. - Preserve the reviewed protocol bounds, replay compatibility aliases, process environment isolation, and semantic redaction limits. - Update the ACPX package patch that the existing workspace patch registry already tracks. - Do not change `pnpm-lock.yaml`, repository workflows, server runtime selection, or the application UI. ## Verification GitHub Actions is the verification authority for this pull request. The repository CI, package TypeScript and Rust checks, package tests, generated-output drift checks, browser checks, security scans, and Greptile review must pass on the exact head. Local test suites were not run because this series uses parallel GitHub Actions for verification. ## Risks This is a large greenfield package change. The main risks are public export drift, generated-output drift, and optional React consumer compatibility. Package boundary checks, clean-consumer checks, and browser tests cover those risks. Production adapter selection and server execution are outside this pull request. ## Stack 1. **This PR:** runner SDK and developer tooling. 2. [Codex production server integration](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12616). 3. [Provider-neutral task-thread UI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/12617). ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, high-reasoning mode, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the feature request template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge
6.1 KiB
PRP v1 expressiveness audit
Verdict
PRP v1 is sufficient for runner lifecycle, replay integrity, negotiated runner
features, runtime/issue-thread request routing, structured work disposition,
terminal causality, and provider-neutral semantic-control-plane receipts. The
optional semantic_tool and terminal.stopReason envelopes now type tool
invocation, authorization denial, redaction, optimistic concurrency, mutation
receipts, artifacts, governed targets, causal continuations, and budget stops.
They remain receipts for control-plane-owned operations, not a provider tool
catalog or permission to move control-plane policy into the runner.
prp-v1-expressiveness-crosswalk.json is the machine-checked source for this
verdict. Its Vitest gate rejects an unclassified required fact, a fact justified
only by a permissive field, an unbounded control-plane-local fact, or an
accepted additive change without required fixtures.
Evidence boundary
This audit compares the canonical capability authority and its traceability
inputs, the real-surface ledger, the deterministic mock, live Codex/runnerd
transport, and PRP schemas/replay fixtures. The wire contract is not the tool
catalog: capability placement controls exposure, while PRP carries execution
and causality. generic_api_request remains test-only and cannot satisfy any
coverage row.
What v1 proves directly
capabilities.schema.jsonnegotiates driver identity, session reuse, steering, interruption, resume, runtime requests, structured results, typed events, and explicit unsupported features.- Events have stable source instance/event ids, source ordering, run/session/ turn/item correlation, priority, and an explicit v1 schema version. Replay rejects unsupported required event versions, requires byte-equivalent duplicate source events, records source gaps, and is side-effect free.
- Commands have controller ordering and preconditions; runtime and issue-thread requests have typed kinds/statuses; results require completion claims, verification, artifacts, and blocker/yield continuations where applicable.
run.terminalis a typed terminal envelope with terminal state, work assessment, and issue-status decision references. Existing golden replay, duplicate-event, unknown-optional-fields, and unsupported-required-version fixtures demonstrate the compatibility boundary.capabilities.semanticToolsadvertises versioned, provider-neutral operation availability and redaction rules. Pairedmcp_app.tool_inputandmcp_app.tool_resultevents carry one safesemantic_toolenvelope per call.terminal.stopReasoncarries a safe budget/cost aggregate and the decision receipt that stopped the run. Evaltrace_completenessreads these PRP wire receipts when available while retaining the existing live-evidence fallback.
Landed additive v1 envelope
The correction is one optional, versioned semantic_tool envelope for
mcp_app.tool_input / mcp_app.tool_result, plus an optional
terminal.stopReason envelope. It defines:
- operation id, call id, correlation ids, idempotency key, outcome, stable code, retryability, and audit/operation receipt id;
- admitted input/output references or digests, redaction disposition, and only safe identifiers; never raw credentials, hidden-company identifiers, or secret payloads;
- authorization boundary (
company,actor,active_task,grant,governed_action,lock, orrevision), current revision where safe, and a deterministic conflict/duplicate result; - artifact/work-product references linked to the semantic receipt and terminal result; immutable interaction/approval document or decision targets; and budget stop reason/aggregate/decision id.
This remains additive because existing v1 consumers can ignore the optional typed envelopes. The reducer intentionally does not project them into session state; they supply inspectable trace evidence only. Unknown optional fields are accepted, while an unknown required envelope version fails closed.
Classification and fixture plan
The crosswalk assigns every required fact to exactly one of: direct v1,
compositional v1 with a listed invariant, control-plane-local, additive v1,
missing fixture/docs, or breaking v2 work. Direct and compositional support is
never inferred merely from additionalProperties: true.
The additive change graduated to direct support with these fixtures and golden projections:
semantic-tool-artifact-happy-path.json— artifact and work-product receipt;semantic-tool-denial-redaction.json— denied/redacted with no fallback;semantic-tool-conflict-duplicate-retry.json— stale conflict and exact retry;semantic-tool-governance-wake-monitor.json— immutable governed targets and continuation chain;budget-cost-stop-reason.json— typed terminal budget/cost stop;semantic-tool-unknown-optional-envelope.json— optional fields accepted with unchanged projection;semantic-tool-unsupported-required-version.json— required v2 envelope rejected fail-closed.
The six accepted fixtures replay to TypeScript/Rust parity summaries and golden snapshots. Shared high-risk semantic vectors compare normalized receipt and state-diff observations across deterministic mock and production bindings.
Explicit exclusions
Checkout/release, task selection, wake routing, budget enforcement, audit and run persistence/replay, assignment, and monitor management are control-plane actions, not runner-wire semantic operations. Cross-company discovery, broad audit access, destructive document lifecycle, and company administration are breaking v2/product-governance work. The runner must report typed unavailable or denied outcomes rather than tunnel those operations through generic payloads.
Review checklist
- Golden replay, duplicate/retry, and unknown-version fixtures accompany every accepted protocol schema/event addition.
- A semantic receipt is typed and safe before any surface is marked supported.
- Control-plane-local decisions stay out of the semantic tool wire.
- Eval trace scoring consumes wire receipts without changing projection semantics.