Files
PaperClipAI/maps
DottaandPaperclip 4d90634f74 feat(connections): add 1Password service-account connector (#17249)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and govern their access to
outside services.
> - Apps connections keep provider credentials in the instance vault and
mediate every action through grants, policies, and audit.
> - Agents currently have no Apps connection for reading or managing
1Password items with an operator-supplied service-account token.
> - 1Password supports this through its official SDK; its documentation
MCP server does not expose vault operations.
> - This pull request adds a one-field service-account connection and
registers eight reviewed SDK actions through the existing
native-provider catalog.
> - Operators can select vault permissions in 1Password and agent/action
access in Paperclip without installing a CLI or handing durable
credentials to agents.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #16144 adds 1Password as Paperclip's secret-storage backend.
This PR adds the separate Apps/tool-access flow with a per-connection
credential; it does not change secret providers or use a server-wide
ambient token.

**Subsystem affected**
Apps catalog, native tool-provider registry, and shared connection
setup.

**Problem or motivation**
People need to paste their own `OP_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_TOKEN`, find official
service-account setup instructions, and authorize agents to use the
selected vaults through ordinary Paperclip governance.

**Proposed solution**
Add `1password/service-account`, with a password field labeled **Paste
your 1Password Service Account token** and a link to [1Password's
creation
instructions](https://www.1password.dev/service-accounts/get-started#create-a-service-account).
Use the pinned official `@1password/sdk` 0.5.0 for vault/item listing,
item and secret-reference reads, and item create/update/archive/delete.

**Alternatives considered**
A remote MCP card would not provide vault access. A local CLI or a
third-party MCP package adds installation and credential surfaces that
the official SDK avoids.

## What Changed

- Added the source and generated catalog definition, permission review,
official light/dark artwork, documentation, and capability-map
references.
- Added a provider-owned SDK bridge with strict schemas, account-domain
validation, contract hashes, fixed errors, bounded output, and
disposable workers with cancellation/deadlines.
- Registered the provider through master's native-provider catalog;
existing setup, health, discovery, gateway, policy, and audit owners
remain in place.
- Labeled the single password field **Paste your 1Password Service
Account token**. The shared formatter preserves explicit credential
prompts; ordinary key labels retain their existing presentation.
- Added credential-ownership, gateway read/write, policy/revocation,
worker, setup UI, and interactive Storybook coverage.

## Verification

- Final review follow-up: added two deterministic worker-entry tests for
nested exact-token redaction and oversized-output rejection. Removing
each guard caused exactly its regression test to fail. The focused
provider suite passed **15 tests**, and the official server typecheck
passed after rebuilding stale workspace SDK artifacts. Current head
`569cb7f9bd57db791fb13a6034ce69bf50878cb1` passed the full [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40016166260),
including typecheck, build, unit/integration tests, and all eight
browser shards. The required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e` gates passed.
[Greptile](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17249#issuecomment-6353731805)
and [Paperclip
Review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17249#issuecomment-6372165895)
each rated this exact head **5/5**, with no open findings. Paperclip
Review completed with a neutral check because its scoped reviewer could
not inspect CI; the full CI result was verified separately. Other
neutral checks and intentionally skipped Storybook jobs contain no
actionable findings.
- CI recovery on the same commit: the first attempt lost six jobs. Five
logged simultaneous runner shutdowns at 18:49 UTC on 2026-10-23; the
sixth stopped logging before a test result and its root cause was not
established. No assertion failure appeared in the retrieved logs. All
six jobs and the aggregate gates passed one failed-job retry. [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40005754936).
- Copy follow-up: the catalog, provider, and setup UI suites passed
**275 tests**. The governed gateway lifecycle passed **3 tests** (one
live-only test skipped), including create, update, archive, and delete.
UI token gates and map checks passed. The branch was rebased onto
`9c442cf48e` to resolve additive catalog conflicts while retaining the
Vercel and Supabase entries. The existing live write proof below remains
applicable; this follow-up changes presentation only.
- Five affected suites, including the existing Daytona consumer, passed
**290 tests** (one opt-in live test skipped in fixture mode). Full `pnpm
-r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. The local broad-suite attempt
could not complete because PostgreSQL semaphore exhaustion prevented a
competing integration suite from starting; the complete affected-file
retry passed after disposable-process cleanup. The prior commit
`f208a8aff6dc28859cc3f343497e18d85f124579` passed the complete CI
matrix. All CI build, typecheck, test, and browser gates also passed on
the earlier commit `9e2f3d3140368a08da43b004b2e8d3a0f4c0fa4d`. The
separate Paperclip Review reported a worker-result regression-test gap
on that head; the follow-up above addresses it. Its review thread is
resolved, and both fresh current-head reviews are clean as recorded
above.
- Token gates, module boundaries, brand validation, map checks, and
Storybook catalog checks passed.
- Direct SDK create/archive/delete and rejected-call coverage passed (13
provider tests); the Storybook Permissions/Test play completed
successfully in Chromium. Server and UI typechecks passed after those
fixes. Greptile passed prior commit
`9e2f3d3140368a08da43b004b2e8d3a0f4c0fa4d` at **5/5**. Both reviewers
also passed the worker-test follow-up at **5/5** as recorded above.
- Live 1Password proof on 2026-10-22: connect, eight-action discovery,
vault listing through an actual run-scoped gateway, refresh, reconnect
preserving identity, another read, removal, and denial through the
retained session passed. Credential absence was asserted in
responses/audit; an exact-token scan of inspected logs and changed files
passed.
- Real browser: Connectors → 1Password → token entry → personal access
limited to one disposable agent → completion → Permissions → Test
`onepassword_list_vaults` succeeded. The disposable connection was
removed afterward.
- Compiled-worker smoke initially exposed inherited Node launch flags.
Workers now use explicit empty `execArgv`; the compiled worker then
authenticated successfully and listed one vault.
- Live write proof on **2026-10-23**: the replacement Keychain token
passed all eight actions through the actual run-scoped gateway for both
personal and shared credentials. The test created, listed, read,
updated, resolved a secret from, archived, and deleted two synthetic
items. Both were absent from subsequent item lists. Refresh/reconnect,
identity preservation, removal, retained-session denial, and credential
absence passed. The live suite passed **3 tests** (one fixture-only test
skipped) in 116.65 seconds. The expanded fixture suite passed **3
tests** (one live-only test skipped); the 13 provider tests and server
typecheck passed. An exact-token scan passed over 64 source/log files.
- Failure history: the original token denied creation on 2026-10-22 and
created no item. The first 2026-10-23 attempt stopped before provider
calls because host PostgreSQL semaphore limits prevented test-database
startup. A temporary ten-connection test profile allowed the complete
retry to pass without changing shared services or host limits. A new
delete-result assertion also exposed an outdated fixture response
(`success` instead of `deleted`); the fixture was corrected and the
complete fixture suite passed.

Official contract sources: [service
accounts](https://www.1password.dev/service-accounts/get-started),
[SDKs](https://www.1password.dev/sdks), [item
management](https://www.1password.dev/sdks/manage-items), [official
JavaScript SDK](https://github.com/1Password/onepassword-sdk-js).

## Risks

- Authorized item/secret reads intentionally return secret values to the
agent and ordinary tool-result history. Select trusted agents and use
restricted service-account vaults; the connection token itself is
redacted.
- New connections retain existing Paperclip action defaults, including
Allowed writes/destructive actions for selected agents. 1Password still
enforces the token's permissions.
- Service-account access cannot be changed in place. Create a
replacement account and reconnect to change vault permissions; read-only
keys can connect but cannot write.
- SDK authentication happens per action in a disposable worker. Calls
have a 30-second maximum; cancellation stops local work, while a
mutation already accepted by 1Password can still finish. Writes are
never automatically retried.
- Additive dependency and catalog change; no database migration.
Disable/remove the connection to withdraw access, or remove the provider
from catalog visibility for rollback.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with code editing, shell/browser tools,
and live provider verification. A more specific runtime model ID and
context-window limit were not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-23 13:27:33 -07:00
..

Paperclip maps

The maps describe the same capabilities from two perspectives:

  • Feature map: what a person can do, where to reach it, and how to verify the user journey. Preserve its Poteto format.
  • Agent access map: the APIs and agent entry points for those capabilities, their permission boundaries, and access verification.

These are sibling directories under maps/. Each feature file has a same-named agent access companion. Reuse the product map's sub-feature IDs, so tasks/create identifies the same capability in both maps. Product behavior remains governed by the implementation spec; a map cannot grant authority or redefine a permission denial as success.

Capability identifiers

The feature ID is the recipe filename without .md, such as onboarding. The full capability ID joins that feature ID and a Sub-features key with /: the company key in feature-map/onboarding.md is onboarding/company. Its agent-access-map/onboarding.md companion uses the same local company key. The feature-map index lists the existing feature and full capability IDs.

Each child page states Feature ID: `onboarding`. after its introduction or product-map link. In feature recipes, show the full ID beside the parsed local key: - `company`: `onboarding/company` — create a company. In access companions and Storybook verification guidance, keep the existing local heading and put Capability ID: `onboarding/company`. beneath it. These labels make the existing identifiers visible without changing keys, anchors, or ID generation.

Use full capability IDs in cross-feature references, Storybook annotations, tests, issues, PRs, and verification evidence. Both segments use lowercase letters, digits, and hyphens. Keep filenames and keys stable when display titles or navigation labels change; renaming either changes the capability ID.

Entry-point IDs describe a surface, such as web-wizard, and are scoped to their recipe. Reference them with a recipe link, such as onboarding.md#web-wizard, and record the capability exercised separately. Navigation section labels are not capability IDs. See IDs and references for examples.

Access contract

Every business operation needs both an API and a usable agent entry point for an actor authorized to perform it. A dedicated tool is optional when REST, the CLI, an assigned MCP client, or native search_api / call_api already provides the operation. Record which agent surfaces actually have that path; an installed CLI or optional MCP package cannot be assumed available to every native/remote run.

Track these independently:

Dimension Values and meaning
API present, missing, not-applicable, or unreviewed. Use exact methods/paths; distinguish protocols from REST.
Agent access available, partial, missing, restricted, operator-only, not-applicable, or unreviewed. Name the supported surface and actual entry point.
Policy Actor, action/grant, company/resource/ownership scope, responsible-user intersection, run requirements, work modes, and gates relevant to the operation.
Evidence source-only, verified, failed, blocked, or not-run. Source presence and successful board calls are not agent verification.
Review depth baseline records representative operations and known gaps; operation-reviewed enumerates the capability's meaningful operations and their individual access contracts.

Broad capabilities such as task properties must be split into operations before they count as operation-reviewed: renaming, metadata edits, assignment, dependencies, and lifecycle changes can use different tools and permission rules. An available read path cannot certify a write path. List/get/create/update/delete, execution/control, credential handling, and resolution are separate where their authority or transport differs. Do not duplicate request schemas from OpenAPI.

Exceptions and restrictions

Presentation-only state, static developer fixtures, and pre-start/local operator work may use not-applicable for a domain API, with a concrete reason and the existing local path. When a capability combines shared data with presentation, split the operations: browser recents do not exempt resource lookup from API coverage. Promoting local state to a shared feature requires revisiting the entry.

A board-only endpoint is restricted for agent identity, not an automatic exception or a missing API. Cite the enforced policy and record whether the agent can request the authorized human's action and observe its result. An unresolved delegation question remains in Gaps. Company access, a job title, a personal assistant's OAuth grant, or an accepted interaction does not grant board identity. Keep budget, approval, secret and execution authority intact.

Check actual route/service authorization and production tool admission. OpenAPI actor labels and scenario/evaluation tool declarations are supporting metadata; record disagreements rather than using them as proof of access. Native API fallback restrictions, tool field/scope limits, and rollout settings are part of the agent path, even when a legacy agent can call the REST endpoint directly.

Companion file format

Each agent-access-map/<area>.md has an H1, a relative link to its product file, and its feature ID, followed by one H2 backticked local key per product sub-feature. Each capability starts with its full capability ID and contains these fields:

  • Review: baseline or operation-reviewed.
  • API: presence state and exact operation IDs, or a reasoned exception.
  • Agent access: availability state and concrete entry points by surface.
  • Policy: relevant permission and runtime boundaries, with source references.
  • Evidence: evidence state, reviewed commit and sources or executed proof.
  • Verification: allowed/denied assertions and observable result; record what has actually run separately from the proposed recipe.
  • Gaps: missing APIs/paths, discovery drift, unreviewed operations or policy decisions; use none only for the enumerated scope that was reviewed.

For an operation-reviewed capability, use H3 backticked operation IDs and repeat API, Agent access, Policy, Evidence, Verification and Gaps for each operation. Use small operation names such as create, update, read, or run-now. The enclosing capability has Review: operation-reviewed only after its meaningful operations have been enumerated. The following excerpt shows one operation; include the others before using that review label:

## `definition`

Review: `operation-reviewed`.

### `create`

API: `present` — POST /api/companies/{companyId}/routines.
Agent access: `available` — agent REST, CLI routine create and native call_api
under the enabled rollout and active-run/mode gates.
Policy: same company; assigneeAgentId must be the calling agent; cite the
routine authorization and native API policy sources.
Evidence: `source-only` — reviewed commit and source links; no live proof.
Verification: `not-run` — create an owned routine; reject assignment to another
agent; inspect saved configuration, attribution and retry behavior.
Gaps: verify ownership and responsible-user resolution with a permitted agent
context; source presence alone does not qualify this operation.

Keeping the maps synchronized

When a change adds/removes a capability or changes its behavior, API, permission, tool binding, CLI support, or work mode, update the affected companion and product recipe as appropriate in the same change. Preserve IDs across renames where the capability is unchanged; update the affected cross-links together. Indexes discover recipes automatically. An API-only change may update the companion without rewriting unchanged user instructions.

maintain-verification-skill owns reconciliation of both maps. It follows changed source and authorization, checks real agent reachability, and records product gaps without implementing them during a maintenance pass. The creation skill uses this structure. verify-paperclip consumes the relevant recipes and reports evidence/drift; map editing belongs to maintenance.

Run the structural check after map changes:

node scripts/check-maps.mjs

It checks paired areas/IDs, navigation metadata, required fields, and local references. It does not certify endpoint authorization, production bindings, operation completeness, or live behavior. Source audits must check those against the existing API and tool contracts; avoid a second schema catalog or runtime.

For live access proof, use Paperclip's existing API/runner/MCP fixtures or an owned isolated instance. Use the actual agent identity, target and work mode. Assert the allowed result and relevant denial (another company/private resource, wrong owner, missing grant, invalid run, restricted mode or resolver). Mutations also need persisted state/attribution and retry behavior. Capture evidence using the existing artifact workflow; keep executed run results separate from generated maps/generated/coverage.json, which lists page references.

Local authorship and generated indexes

Change only the recipes, access contracts and stories whose behavior or intent changed. Feature recipes own navigation metadata; stories own small parameters.paperclip annotations. Keep the feature-map README's readable ID index aligned with those sources; it does not register entries for generation. Do not refresh counts in shared READMEs, inventories, fingerprints or review journals.

node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs validates and generates aggregate navigation, Storybook data, verification routes and the page inventory. All outputs live in ignored maps/generated/, ui/storybook/generated/, and the ignored Storybook preview.tsx wrapper. Start/build and UI typechecking generate their own inputs. A clean merged checkout therefore assembles both branches' changes automatically.

Git provides history and diffs. PRs, issues and CI artifacts retain review/run evidence for the named revision. Capability associations do not create whole-file review dependencies. Keep durable scenario limits in the affected recipe or story.