Files
PaperClipAI/scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs
T
DottaandPaperclip ffff1fe6e3 feat(runner): define package API and verification boundary (#12129)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The runner package now has protocol, transport, provider, catalog,
and authorization foundations.
> - Its first upstream package boundary should expose only the
implemented runtime and test-helper surfaces.
> - Rust correctness belongs in the repository existing build
verification, without introducing a parallel release process.
> - Direct package creation must build the files declared by the package
manifest.
> - This pull request defines the minimal package API and verifies the
optimized runner binaries in the existing PR and release Build jobs.
> - The benefit is a production-ready runner package boundary with
minimal build-process change.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #11962

This pull request replaces one bounded part of the archived large runner
change. It follows the package-local authorization change in #12126.

## What Changed

- Export only `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner` and
`@paperclipai/paperclip-runner/testing`.
- Keep Node-only fixture loading and semantic conformance helpers out of
the runtime root.
- Add a provider-neutral semantic conformance kit with stable JSON
comparison and fail-closed input checks.
- Keep deferred SDK, eval, browser, React, lab, and command surfaces
private.
- Pin the runner Rust toolchain to 1.97.1 with the minimal profile and
`rustfmt`.
- Run the Rust workspace tests in release mode.
- Launch the optimized `paperclip-runnerd` and fake-harness binaries in
process-level integration coverage.
- Add one `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all` step
to each existing PR and release Build job.
- Make the existing server `prepack` lifecycle run its existing build
after it prepares UI assets.
- Document that no production adapter starts runnerd yet.

This revision adds no standalone GitHub Actions job. It adds no server
runner dependency or runner vendoring. It adds no Docker bootstrap or
clean-consumer harness. It does not change `pnpm-lock.yaml`.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all`
  - 66 TypeScript tests
  - 8 protocol contract tests
  - 56 Rust unit and integration tests
- Release-mode integration coverage launches the optimized runnerd and
fake-harness binaries.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/server-package-build-script.test.ts` (2 tests)
- Clean `pnpm pack` from `server/` rebuilt the server and produced both
`package/dist/index.js` and `package/dist/index.d.ts`.
- `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs` (8
tests)
- `pnpm -r typecheck`
- `pnpm build`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- `git diff --check`
- No `pnpm-lock.yaml` diff.
- The diff changes 12 files.

## Risks

The runner adds Rust work to the existing Build jobs. These jobs can
take longer on a cold cache. The pinned toolchain makes contributor and
CI behavior reproducible. Cargo tests use `--release` to verify
optimized executables. The server prepack lifecycle now performs the
build that its published entry points require. This can make direct
server packing slower. This pull request does not wire runnerd into the
server. It does not select runnerd for any adapter. Existing application
execution and finalization paths remain unchanged.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. Agentic coding mode used repository tools, code
execution, and automated tests.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-08-25 09:31:48 -05:00

136 lines
6.4 KiB
JavaScript

import assert from "node:assert/strict";
import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
import path from "node:path";
import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
import test from "node:test";
const repoRoot = path.resolve(path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)), "..", "..");
function readWorkflow(name) {
return readFileSync(path.join(repoRoot, ".github/workflows", name), "utf8");
}
test("release workflow delegates stable and canary verification to the reusable workflow", () => {
const releaseWorkflow = readWorkflow("release.yml");
assert.match(
releaseWorkflow,
/verify_canary:\n\s+if: github\.event_name == 'push'\n\s+uses: \.\/\.github\/workflows\/release-verify\.yml\n\s+with:\n\s+ref: \$\{\{ github\.sha \}\}/,
);
// The stable lane is gated on the stable channel since the nightly lane
// was added; a `needs:` line (for example a preflight job) may sit between
// the gate and the delegation.
// The stable preflight resolves source_ref to an immutable SHA exactly
// once; verification must consume that pin, not re-resolve the ref.
assert.match(
releaseWorkflow,
/verify_stable:\n\s+if: github\.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && inputs\.channel == 'stable'\n(?:\s+needs: [^\n]+\n)?\s+uses: \.\/\.github\/workflows\/release-verify\.yml\n\s+with:\n\s+ref: \$\{\{ needs\.preflight_stable\.outputs\.sha \}\}/,
);
assert.doesNotMatch(releaseWorkflow, /verify_(?:canary|stable):[\s\S]*?pnpm test:run(?:\n|$)/);
});
test("onboard smoke container binds beyond loopback so the mapped port is reachable", () => {
const dockerfile = readFileSync(path.join(repoRoot, "docker/Dockerfile.onboard-smoke"), "utf8");
// `onboard --yes` without an explicit --bind prefers trusted-local
// defaults and writes a loopback bind, which Docker port mapping cannot
// reach. The smoke container must pin a non-loopback preset.
assert.match(dockerfile, /onboard --yes --bind lan/);
});
test("promotion selection guards against sources that predate their channel tooling", () => {
const releaseWorkflow = readWorkflow("release.yml");
// Promotions run the source commit's release.sh, so selection must reject
// sources whose tooling does not know the target channel yet.
assert.match(releaseWorkflow, /git show "\$\{sha\}:scripts\/release\.sh" \| grep -qF 'canary\|nightly'/);
assert.match(releaseWorkflow, /git show "\$\{sha\}:scripts\/release\.sh" \| grep -qF 'canary\|nightly\|beta\|stable\)'/);
});
test("candidate-branch betas are validated and fully verified before publish", () => {
const releaseWorkflow = readWorkflow("release.yml");
// Candidate heads are new commits: selection must pin the naming
// convention and publication must be gated on full verification.
assert.match(releaseWorkflow, /candidate\/beta-\*\)/);
assert.match(
releaseWorkflow,
/verify_beta_candidate:\n\s+needs: select_beta\n\s+if: needs\.select_beta\.outputs\.mode == 'candidate'\n\s+uses: \.\/\.github\/workflows\/release-verify\.yml/,
);
assert.match(releaseWorkflow, /needs\.verify_beta_candidate\.result == 'success'/);
});
test("post-publish beta smoke survives the skipped candidate-verification ancestor", () => {
const releaseWorkflow = readWorkflow("release.yml");
// publish_beta's needs chain contains verify_beta_candidate, which is
// skipped on promote-mode betas. An `if:` without a status-check function
// gets an implicit success() that evaluates that chain transitively and
// silently skips the smoke. The condition must stay explicit.
assert.match(
releaseWorkflow,
/smoke_beta:\n\s+needs: publish_beta\n\s+if: \$\{\{ !cancelled\(\) && needs\.publish_beta\.result == 'success' && !inputs\.dry_run \}\}/,
);
});
test("every lane's tag push degrades to recovery instructions when rejected", () => {
const releaseWorkflow = readWorkflow("release.yml");
// GITHUB_TOKEN may not create refs pointing at workflow-modifying commits
// from dispatch or scheduled runs; a rejected tag push after a successful
// npm publish must surface runbook recovery commands, not a bare error.
const occurrences = releaseWorkflow.match(/## Tag push rejected/g) ?? [];
assert.equal(occurrences.length, 3, "nightly, beta, and stable each carry the recovery summary");
});
test("release smoke workflow extends the container readiness budget for CI", () => {
const smokeWorkflow = readWorkflow("release-smoke.yml");
const harness = readFileSync(path.join(repoRoot, "scripts/docker-onboard-smoke.sh"), "utf8");
// CI containers cold-install paperclipai and embedded postgres, so the
// workflow must extend the harness's local-default readiness budget.
assert.match(smokeWorkflow, /SMOKE_READY_TIMEOUT_SECONDS=\d+/);
const ciBudget = Number(smokeWorkflow.match(/SMOKE_READY_TIMEOUT_SECONDS=(\d+)/)[1]);
assert.ok(ciBudget >= 300, `CI readiness budget ${ciBudget}s should be at least 300s`);
assert.match(harness, /SMOKE_READY_TIMEOUT_SECONDS="\$\{SMOKE_READY_TIMEOUT_SECONDS:-\d+\}"/);
assert.match(harness, /wait_for_http "\$PAPERCLIP_PUBLIC_URL\/api\/health" "\$SMOKE_READY_TIMEOUT_SECONDS" 1/);
});
test("release verify workflow covers the same split test surface as stable PR verification", () => {
const verifyWorkflow = readWorkflow("release-verify.yml");
assert.match(verifyWorkflow, /workflow_call:/);
assert.match(verifyWorkflow, /node \.\/scripts\/release-package-map\.mjs check/);
assert.match(verifyWorkflow, /pnpm -r typecheck/);
assert.match(verifyWorkflow, /pnpm build/);
assert.match(verifyWorkflow, /pnpm --filter @paperclipai\/paperclip-runner check:all/);
for (const group of ["general-server", "general-workspaces-a", "general-workspaces-b"]) {
assert.match(verifyWorkflow, new RegExp(`group: ${group}`));
}
for (const shardIndex of [0, 1, 2]) {
assert.match(
verifyWorkflow,
new RegExp(`group: general-server[\\s\\S]*?shard_index: ${shardIndex}[\\s\\S]*?shard_count: 3`),
);
}
for (const shardIndex of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]) {
assert.match(verifyWorkflow, new RegExp(`shard_index: ${shardIndex}[\\s\\S]*?shard_count: 5`));
}
// workspaces-a splits with Vitest native --shard in pr.yml; release
// verification must keep the same two-shard coverage.
for (const shardIndex of [0, 1]) {
assert.match(
verifyWorkflow,
new RegExp(`group: general-workspaces-a[\\s\\S]*?shard_index: ${shardIndex}\\n\\s+shard_count: 2`),
);
}
assert.match(verifyWorkflow, /pnpm test:run:general -- --group/);
assert.match(verifyWorkflow, /pnpm test:run:serialized -- --shard-index/);
});