mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-08 01:57:31 +01:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
dd889e6a0b
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run on the native Runner through the Codex app-server and the Claude ACP harness > - Both harnesses report the provider account's rate-limit windows: Codex sends `account/rateLimits/updated`, and Claude sends its SDK `rate_limit_event` as `usage_update._meta["_claude/rateLimit"]` > - Paperclip dropped both signals, so an operator could not see that an agent was near or past its provider limit > - This pull request normalizes both signals into one account-scoped snapshot, keeps the latest snapshot per agent, and shows it as one "Usage limit" line in the task properties pane > - The benefit is that an operator sees "5h 78% · resets 15:40" (amber above 80%, "Limited until …" when the provider refuses work, "using credits" when a used-up window falls back to credits) next to the assignee, and can click it for every window ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19246 Refs #19259 **Is your feature request related to a problem?** Codex and Claude report provider rate-limit windows during a run. Paperclip dropped them: the Codex notification fell through the Rust normalizer with no branch, and ACPX dropped Claude's `_meta`. Operators could not see how close an agent was to its provider limit. **Describe the solution you'd like** Store the latest reported windows per agent and show one compact line in the task properties pane, with a popover that lists every window. **Describe alternatives you've considered** A full gauge in the agent list and the run header. A design review chose one property line with a details popover instead. ## What Changed - Runner (Rust, the runnerd path): new `provider_rate_limits.rs`. Codex `account/rateLimits/updated` becomes a `provider.notice.recorded` event (category `provider.rate_limits`, scope `account`). `CodexProviderState` merges sparse updates and emits a notice only when the windows change. ACPX `usage_update` with a sanitized `rateLimit` field also emits the notice. - Runner (sidecar): `acpx-runtime-sidecar.ts` forwards only `status`, `rateLimitType`, `utilization` and `resetsAt` from `_meta["_claude/rateLimit"]`. This needs the ACPX `_meta` passthrough from #19259. Until that merges, Claude emits nothing. - Runner (TypeScript in-process drivers): the same mapping in `codex-session-notifications.ts` and `codex-acpx-driver.ts` through `drivers/provider-rate-limits.ts`. - Shared: `provider-rate-limits.ts` holds the snapshot type, the parser, the merge, and `summarizeProviderRateLimits` (fullest current window, expiry by reset time, limited versus using credits). - Server: `agent-provider-rate-limits.ts` merges each notice into `agent_runtime_state.state_json.providerRateLimits`, scoped by company and agent. A session reset keeps the snapshot. No migration. - UI: `AgentRateLimitPropertyValue` adds a "Usage limit" row under the assignee in `IssueProperties`. Transcripts treat the notice as run-log only. A run status event refreshes the assignee's runtime state. - Storybook: `Tasks and conversations/Task creation and lifecycle/Usage limit property`. - Docs: `doc/run-log-events.md` describes the notice and its storage. ## Verification - `cd packages/paperclip-runner/runner && cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib rate_limit` and `--test acpx_provider_events`: sparse Codex merge, dedupe, reached window, checkpoint round trip, Claude utilization and rejection, notice shape. - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/drivers/provider-rate-limits.test.ts src/drivers/codex` - `cd packages/shared && npx vitest run src/provider-rate-limits.test.ts`: summary, expiry, limited, using credits, parse and merge. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/agent-provider-rate-limits.test.ts`: create and merge, out-of-order snapshot, company isolation, unrelated notices, session reset keeps the snapshot. - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/transcript src/components/issue-properties src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider` - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm check:token-gates` pass. - Live test on a local worktree instance: a native Codex agent on a ChatGPT subscription login ran a real task. The runner recorded one `provider.rate_limits` notice. The server stored it. The task properties pane showed "7d 100% · using credits" (this account's weekly window was used up and had credits, and the run succeeded). The transcript showed no extra row. - Not verified live: Claude. The local Claude CLI was not signed in, and the Claude path also needs #19259. The Rust and sidecar paths have tests. - Not run locally: the full `pnpm test:run` and `pnpm build`. CI runs them. ## Risks - Low risk. The snapshot is display data. It does not hold or start work. The existing provider-limit wait (#19246) still reads typed run failures. - Codex can send a rate-limit update often. The runner emits a notice only when the windows change, so run-log growth stays small. - With API-key auth, the harnesses report no windows, so no row appears. This is the intended result. - `CodexProviderState` gains two optional serde fields with defaults, so older checkpoints still load. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>