Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/modules/wake-queue/adapters/queued-comment-postgres.test.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip 5f0da562db fix(server): wake chat lifecycle milestones from committed changes (#17606)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Connected chats show safe notices when a run starts, waits,
finishes, or fails.
> - A recurring scan projected these notices even when no eligible work
existed.
> - Eligibility depends on committed run state, conversation lineage,
and current authority.
> - Existing database rows can reconstruct that work after restart.
> - This PR wakes a scoped worker from those writes and removes
lifecycle polling.
> - Native progress events keep their separate existing owner until the
next migration.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

The chat maintenance timer repeatedly scanned run lifecycle state. Empty
and settled instances still queried the database. A run-status event
alone cannot replace the scan: prompt receipts, continuation receipts,
identity changes, and restored authority can make a run eligible later.

**What did you expect?**

Committed changes wake projection. Startup reconstructs eligible work. A
completed pass stops until another relevant change arrives. Failed work
retains recovery without scanning settled history forever.

**Steps to reproduce**

Configure an automatic chat endpoint. Finish its work, or leave it
unused. Observe recurring lifecycle projection queries from the chat
maintenance callback.

Stacked on #17592. Related foundation: #15625. This PR owns lifecycle
milestones only.

## What Changed

- Preserve upstream coalesced Cloud membership writes together with
locked membership restoration and its committed chat notification.

- Signal milestone eligibility from the real Slack account-link
transaction.

- Register the lifecycle worker with the existing delivery coordinator.
Remove lifecycle projection from the periodic chat callback. Keep native
progress in a separately named lane and preserve the explicit combined
API.
- Reconstruct company/issue scopes from the existing selector. Drain
bounded batches with company fairness. Retry failures, retain writes
through drain/resume, and disarm settled work.
- Signal from supported run, presentation, interaction, receipt,
lineage, conversation, recovery, and authority writers. Preserve their
transaction ownership, including nested savepoints and uncertain
settlement. No new table is added.
- Preserve provider authorization, authored-final suppression,
responsible-user continuity, deduplication, the 24-hour selection
window, and raw-output restrictions. Keep provider interpretation in its
owner.
- Preserve PostgreSQL timestamp precision in lifecycle pagination.
Rejected submillisecond candidates must not repeat the same page and
starve later notices.
- Document producer coverage and alternate-writer dispositions in
`doc/plans/2026-10-25-chat-run-milestone-sleep-audit.md`.

## Verification

Published head: `1d056f68c5b1005933b9e12de8745bf1c4cbeeca`, targeting
master after #17592 merged at
`7d75ae0569e41786640cf09647ae8849411d2f22`. A normal merge integrates
the actual landed parent. The entire 77-path milestone patch is
binary-identical to the locally verified preparation across that
ancestry reconciliation; both unrelated master paths are preserved. The
four earlier producer/test integration conflicts retain scoped milestone
and voice notices, current onboarding completion admission, and expanded
identity query/read-scope coverage.

- **330 distinct selected cases pass on the verified unchanged patch:**
305 across 14 complete suites (all five milestone worker suites, run
identity, board claim, Cloud provisioning, auth session routes, Cloud
actor authentication, stale-lock recovery, GitHub credentials, project
Git authorization, and app admission wiring), plus 25 selected real chat
producer cases. The remaining 1,590 chat integration cases were skipped,
not passed.
- The real producer cases cover saved milestone discovery, GitHub and
Slack identity changes, account-link rollback/reconfirmation, ordinary
ingress reactivation, post-close action/delivery receipt settlement, all
ten authority-restoration paths including Cloud synchronization, and
changed native review metadata.
- Worker coverage verifies outer commit, rollback, uncertain-write
recovery, restart, bounded batching/fairness, timestamp precision,
retries, drain/resume, and settled SQL quiet. Authorization and existing
publication deduplication remain with their owning services.
- Server production typechecking, build, and module-boundary checks
pass. The tests above were executed separately. Production typechecking
excludes `src/__tests__` and does not replace those runs. Each database
owner uses its own newly created and app-migrated PostgreSQL fixture.
- [Current-parent acceptance and preserved failure
ledger](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/1d056f68c5b1005933b9e12de8745bf1c4cbeeca/doc/plans/2026-10-25-chat-run-milestone-sleep-audit.md#current-parent-integration-and-acceptance-october-28)
records commands, counts, producer scope, conflict dispositions, and
limits. Earlier combined-stack counts and failures keep their original
revision scope; local acceptance does not erase old CI failures.
- No new migration, queue table, dependency, workflow, or shared
scheduler contract is introduced. Parent migration 0397, bounded consent
recovery, voice cleanup/retention repairs, and runner checkpoint
restoration remain present.
- **Exact-head Greptile is 5/5 and all 55 current checks are clean.** No
Ponytail review is present, which is an explicitly authorized
nonblocker; no failing review is waived. Older reviews and parent checks
are not current passes. Actual failing Ponytail findings must be fixed;
an absent/stopped/paused turn without a verdict is an authorized
nonblocker. Active unfinished Ponytail uses its original request/start
timer, with a 25-minute monitor cutoff respecting the user's 30-minute
maximum.
- No complete local repository matrix, live provider tenant, external
alarm, physical host/database suspension, or fleet savings claim is
made. Native progress remains a separate following slice.

## Risks

- A future eligibility writer must notify the existing projection
boundary. Independent SQL writers or another active server process are
outside this process-local signal contract.
- Authority and lineage remain sensitive. The worker uses the existing
selectors and publication policy; it does not grant execution or
disclosure authority.
- Native progress and other publication maintenance still have recurring
work. This PR removes one reason, not the entire chat maintenance timer.
- Worker quiet does not prove database suspension, host sleep, or
external alarm coverage. Cloud sleep blockers remain unchanged.
- Merge eligibility requires passing current-head CI and Greptile 5/5
after this actual-master reconciliation. Subsequent stack slices retain
their own gates.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact serving model ID and
context-window size are not exposed. Used repository inspection,
reasoning, shell execution, PostgreSQL tests, browser E2Es and GitHub
tools.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details available in this session)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run the documented focused tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-28 11:07:54 -05:00

340 lines
15 KiB
TypeScript

import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
import { eq } from "drizzle-orm";
import { afterAll, afterEach, beforeAll, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import type { Db } from "@paperclipai/db";
import { activityLog, agentWakeupRequests, agents, companies, createDb, heartbeatRuns, issueComments, issues } from "@paperclipai/db";
import {
getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport,
startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase,
} from "../../../__tests__/helpers/embedded-postgres.js";
import { resolveExternalTestDatabaseUrl } from "../../../__tests__/helpers/external-test-database.js";
import { createQueuedCommentIssueLockWriter } from "./queued-comment-postgres.js";
import type { QueuedCommentQueuePostgresAdapterDeps } from "./queued-comment-postgres.js";
import { QueuedCommentMutationError } from "../application/queued-comment-use-cases.js";
// Proves the same two properties the release-half adapter test proves for
// this module's other transaction: the one company the caller names in
// `issue.companyId` binds every read and write for the whole transaction, so
// a caller-supplied `issue`/`wake` for the wrong company sees nothing, and a
// guarded write that affects no row rolls the transaction back instead of
// leaving a partial write. The decision branching itself is proven against
// plain facts in `domain/policy.test.ts`; the use-case orchestration is
// proven against a mocked port in `application/queued-comment-use-cases.test.ts`.
const external = resolveExternalTestDatabaseUrl("PAPERCLIP_QUEUED_COMMENT_TEST_DATABASE_URL");
const embeddedPostgresSupport = external ? { supported: true, reason: undefined } : await getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport();
const describeEmbeddedPostgres = embeddedPostgresSupport.supported ? describe : describe.skip;
if (!embeddedPostgresSupport.supported) {
console.warn(
`Skipping embedded Postgres queued-comment adapter tests on this host: ${embeddedPostgresSupport.reason ?? "unsupported environment"}`,
);
}
describeEmbeddedPostgres("queued-comment postgres adapter", () => {
let db!: ReturnType<typeof createDb>;
let tempDb: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase>> | null = null;
const noopDeps: QueuedCommentQueuePostgresAdapterDeps = {
syncCommentReferences: async () => {},
deleteCommentReferenceSource: async () => {},
syncCommentExternalObjectsSafely: async () => {},
};
beforeAll(async () => {
if (!external) tempDb = await startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase("paperclip-queued-comment-postgres-adapter-");
db = createDb(external ?? tempDb!.connectionString);
}, 20_000);
afterEach(async () => {
// Deleted first: activity_log rows reference companies, agents, and
// heartbeat_runs, and none of those foreign keys cascade.
await db.delete(activityLog);
await db.delete(issueComments);
await db.delete(heartbeatRuns);
await db.delete(agentWakeupRequests);
await db.delete(issues);
await db.delete(agents);
await db.delete(companies);
});
afterAll(async () => {
await db?.$client.end();
await tempDb?.cleanup();
});
async function seedCompany(): Promise<string> {
const companyId = randomUUID();
await db.insert(companies).values({
id: companyId,
name: "Paperclip",
issuePrefix: `T${companyId.replace(/-/g, "").slice(0, 6).toUpperCase()}`,
requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents: false,
defaultResponsibleUserId: "responsible-user",
});
return companyId;
}
async function seedAgent(input: { companyId: string; adapterType?: string }): Promise<string> {
const agentId = randomUUID();
await db.insert(agents).values({
id: agentId,
companyId: input.companyId,
name: "CodexCoder",
role: "engineer",
status: "active",
adapterType: input.adapterType ?? "codex_local",
adapterConfig: {},
runtimeConfig: { heartbeat: { wakeOnDemand: true, maxConcurrentRuns: 1 } },
permissions: {},
});
return agentId;
}
async function seedIssue(input: { companyId: string; assigneeAgentId: string | null }): Promise<string> {
const issueId = randomUUID();
await db.insert(issues).values({
id: issueId,
companyId: input.companyId,
title: "Queued-comment adapter fixture issue",
status: "in_progress",
priority: "medium",
assigneeAgentId: input.assigneeAgentId,
});
return issueId;
}
async function seedComment(input: { companyId: string; issueId: string; authorUserId: string }): Promise<string> {
const commentId = randomUUID();
await db.insert(issueComments).values({
id: commentId,
companyId: input.companyId,
issueId: input.issueId,
authorUserId: input.authorUserId,
body: "queued message",
});
return commentId;
}
async function seedDeferredWake(input: {
companyId: string;
agentId: string;
issueId: string;
commentIds: string[];
}): Promise<string> {
const id = randomUUID();
await db.insert(agentWakeupRequests).values({
id,
companyId: input.companyId,
agentId: input.agentId,
source: "automation",
reason: "issue_commented",
status: "deferred_issue_execution",
requestedByActorType: "user",
payload: {
issueId: input.issueId,
_paperclipWakeContext: { wakeCommentIds: input.commentIds },
},
});
return id;
}
it("scopes the wake lookup to its own company: a foreign-company issue context resolves not_pending and deletes nothing", async () => {
const companyId = await seedCompany();
const otherCompanyId = await seedCompany();
const agentId = await seedAgent({ companyId });
const issueId = await seedIssue({ companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId });
const commentId = await seedComment({ companyId, issueId, authorUserId: "user-1" });
const wakeId = await seedDeferredWake({ companyId, agentId, issueId, commentIds: [commentId] });
const issueLock = createQueuedCommentIssueLockWriter(db, noopDeps);
await expect(
issueLock.withLockedQueue(
{
// The caller mistakenly names the *other* company on the issue
// context; that single value binds every read and write for the
// whole transaction, so it alone must decide what is visible.
issue: { id: issueId, companyId: otherCompanyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId, executionRunId: null },
actor: { actorType: "user", actorId: "user-1", agentId: null, runId: null, agentApiKeyId: null },
queueId: wakeId,
},
async () => {
throw new Error("fn must not run when the wake is invisible to the caller's company");
},
),
).rejects.toMatchObject({ code: "queued_comment_not_pending" });
const commentRow = (await db.select().from(issueComments).where(eq(issueComments.id, commentId)))[0];
expect(commentRow?.deletedAt ?? null).toBeNull();
const wakeRow = (await db.select().from(agentWakeupRequests).where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, wakeId)))[0];
expect(wakeRow?.status).toBe("deferred_issue_execution");
});
it("rolls back a discard when the comment id given belongs to a different issue than the one this transaction locked", async () => {
const companyId = await seedCompany();
const agentId = await seedAgent({ companyId });
const issueId = await seedIssue({ companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId });
const otherIssueId = await seedIssue({ companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId });
const commentId = await seedComment({ companyId, issueId: otherIssueId, authorUserId: "user-1" });
const wakeId = await seedDeferredWake({ companyId, agentId, issueId, commentIds: [commentId] });
const issueLock = createQueuedCommentIssueLockWriter(db, noopDeps);
await expect(
issueLock.withLockedQueue(
{
issue: { id: issueId, companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId, executionRunId: null },
actor: { actorType: "user", actorId: "user-1", agentId: null, runId: null, agentApiKeyId: null },
queueId: wakeId,
},
async (_locked, transaction) => {
// The comment belongs to a different issue than the one this
// transaction locked. The write's own `issueId` predicate, not
// just the bound company, must decide what is visible.
const deleted = await transaction.deleteComment({ issueId, commentId });
if (!deleted) {
throw new QueuedCommentMutationError("queued_comment_not_pending", "The queued message is no longer pending");
}
return deleted;
},
),
).rejects.toMatchObject({ code: "queued_comment_not_pending" });
const commentRow = (await db.select().from(issueComments).where(eq(issueComments.id, commentId)))[0];
expect(commentRow).toBeDefined();
expect(commentRow?.deletedAt ?? null).toBeNull();
});
it("edits the comment body, syncs references, and rebuilds the queue snapshot inside one company-scoped transaction", async () => {
const companyId = await seedCompany();
const agentId = await seedAgent({ companyId });
const issueId = await seedIssue({ companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId });
const commentId = await seedComment({ companyId, issueId, authorUserId: "user-1" });
const wakeId = await seedDeferredWake({ companyId, agentId, issueId, commentIds: [commentId] });
let syncedCommentId: string | null = null;
const deps: QueuedCommentQueuePostgresAdapterDeps = {
...noopDeps,
syncCommentReferences: async (id) => {
syncedCommentId = id;
},
};
const issueLock = createQueuedCommentIssueLockWriter(db, deps);
const queue = await issueLock.withLockedQueue(
{
issue: { id: issueId, companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId, executionRunId: null },
actor: { actorType: "user", actorId: "user-1", agentId: null, runId: null, agentApiKeyId: null },
queueId: wakeId,
},
async (locked, transaction) => {
expect(locked.state).toBe("deferred");
const updated = await transaction.updateCommentBody({
issueId,
commentId,
body: "edited body",
updatedAt: new Date(),
});
expect(updated).toBe(true);
await transaction.syncCommentReferences(commentId);
return transaction.buildQueueSnapshot({
issue: { id: issueId, companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId, executionRunId: null },
actor: { actorType: "user", actorId: "user-1", agentId: null, runId: null, agentApiKeyId: null },
wake: locked.wake,
state: locked.state,
queueRun: locked.queueRun,
activeRun: locked.activeRun,
});
},
);
expect(syncedCommentId).toBe(commentId);
expect(queue.entries).toHaveLength(1);
expect((queue.entries[0]!.comment as { body: string }).body).toBe("edited body");
const commentRow = (await db.select().from(issueComments).where(eq(issueComments.id, commentId)))[0];
expect(commentRow?.body).toBe("edited body");
});
it("rolls back an already-applied comment edit when its own activity insert fails", async () => {
const companyId = await seedCompany();
const agentId = await seedAgent({ companyId });
const issueId = await seedIssue({ companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId });
const commentId = await seedComment({ companyId, issueId, authorUserId: "user-1" });
const wakeId = await seedDeferredWake({ companyId, agentId, issueId, commentIds: [commentId] });
const issueLock = createQueuedCommentIssueLockWriter(db, noopDeps);
const missingAgentId = randomUUID();
await expect(
issueLock.withLockedQueue(
{
issue: { id: issueId, companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId, executionRunId: null },
actor: { actorType: "user", actorId: "user-1", agentId: null, runId: null, agentApiKeyId: null },
queueId: wakeId,
},
async (_locked, transaction) => {
await transaction.updateCommentBody({
issueId,
commentId,
body: "edited body",
updatedAt: new Date(),
});
// `agentId` carries a foreign key to `agents.id`; naming an agent
// that was never seeded forces the activity insert to fail, which
// must roll back the comment edit issued moments earlier on the
// same transaction.
await transaction.logActivity({
actorType: "agent",
actorId: missingAgentId,
agentId: missingAgentId,
runId: null,
agentApiKeyId: null,
action: "issue.queued_comment_edited",
entityId: issueId,
details: {},
});
},
),
).rejects.toMatchObject({ cause: { code: "23503" } });
const commentRow = (await db.select().from(issueComments).where(eq(issueComments.id, commentId)))[0];
expect(commentRow?.body).toBe("queued message");
const activityRows = await db.select().from(activityLog).where(eq(activityLog.entityId, issueId));
expect(activityRows).toHaveLength(0);
});
// Pins a fact the database itself cannot persist today: `runtime_mode` is
// a NOT NULL column, so a real active run's own field is never null. The
// port type allows it (`runtimeMode: string | null`), so this test builds
// the fact directly instead of through a database row, to keep this
// branch of the shared steering rule under a regression test.
it("answers the steering question for a deferred paperclip_runner queue whose active run has no persisted runtime mode yet", async () => {
const companyId = await seedCompany();
const agentId = await seedAgent({ companyId, adapterType: "paperclip_runner" });
const issueId = await seedIssue({ companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId });
const commentId = await seedComment({ companyId, issueId, authorUserId: "user-1" });
const wakeId = await seedDeferredWake({ companyId, agentId, issueId, commentIds: [commentId] });
const issueLock = createQueuedCommentIssueLockWriter(db, noopDeps);
const queue = await issueLock.withLockedQueue(
{
issue: { id: issueId, companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId, executionRunId: null },
actor: { actorType: "user", actorId: "user-1", agentId: null, runId: null, agentApiKeyId: null },
queueId: wakeId,
},
async (locked, transaction) => {
expect(locked.state).toBe("deferred");
return transaction.buildQueueSnapshot({
issue: { id: issueId, companyId, assigneeAgentId: agentId, executionRunId: null },
actor: { actorType: "user", actorId: "user-1", agentId: null, runId: null, agentApiKeyId: null },
wake: locked.wake,
state: "deferred",
queueRun: null,
activeRun: { id: randomUUID(), status: "running", runtimeMode: null, contextSnapshot: {} },
});
},
);
expect(queue.protocol).toBe("paperclip_runner_v1");
expect(queue.steeringDisposition).toBe("temporarily_unavailable");
});
});