Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/__tests__/human-directed-work.test.ts
T
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5 11ac90e31f fix(build): typecheck server/src/__tests__ and fix every type error (#18739)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The server has about 1,100 test and helper files in
`server/src/__tests__`
> - `server/tsconfig.json` excludes that directory, Vitest does not
check types, and no script runs the tsconfig in that directory
> - So a test can call a function with the wrong arguments and still
pass, and no tool reports it
> - This gap hid 2,168 real type errors, and some of them hid tests that
did not test what they claim
> - This pull request fixes all of these errors and adds the directory
to the server layers from paperclipai/paperclip#18737
> - The benefit is that a type error in a server test now fails the
typecheck, with no baseline and no backlog

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs paperclipai/paperclip#18737, which is merged and added the server
layers. Refs paperclipai/paperclip#18738, which is merged and checks the
test projects outside `pnpm -r`, so it is not a duplicate. Refs
paperclipai/paperclip#18137, which records that this directory has no
check.

**What happened?**

No tool checked the types of 1,074 of the 1,101 files in
`server/src/__tests__`. I searched `package.json`, the workflows, and
all tsconfig files. 27 files are in the program of another tsconfig, and
these 27 have 0 errors. 11 of the 27 are in
`helpers/maintenance/tsconfig.json`. No script ran that project when I
measured this. paperclipai/paperclip#18738 now runs it.

**Expected behavior**

The server typecheck checks these files, and a type error fails the
check.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. On the base commit, run `tsc -p server/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json
--noEmit`. It reports 6,536 errors and needs 12.3 GiB.
2. Add a type error to any file in `server/src/__tests__`.
3. Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`. It passes.

**Paperclip version or commit**

I measured the error breakdown below on commit `8dfd632452`, with
TypeScript 7.0.2. The branch now includes master up to
paperclipai/paperclip#18865.

**Deployment mode**

Not applicable. This issue applies to development and CI. No production
source file in the server changes.

### Error breakdown

Each row adds one change to the row above.

| Step | Total errors | Change | Cause |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Config as committed | 6,536 | | |
| Add `src/types/*.d.ts` | 4,447 | -2,089 | Config. The Express request
types were missing. |
| Set `rootDir` to the repository root | 2,436 | -2,011 | Config. |
| Set `allowImportingTsExtensions` | 2,181 | -255 | Config. Vitest
accepts `.ts` imports. |
| Add `ES2024.Promise` to `lib` | 2,138 | -43 | Config. Node 24 has
`Promise.withResolvers`. |
| Set `allowJs` for `.mjs` imports | 2,148 | +10 | Config. It removes 8
`TS7016` errors and shows new real errors. |
| Set `declaration` to false | 2,142 | -6 | Config. Tests emit nothing.
|
| Count only files in `server/src` | 2,058 | -84 | Other packages: 53
Daytona, 29 Runner test, 2 UI. |

So 4,478 of the 6,536 errors (69%) came from config or scope, and 2,058
are real type errors in 314 files. The 29 Runner test errors are also
real, which gives 2,087 errors. Tests that master added after this
measurement had 81 more errors, so this pull request fixes 2,168 errors.

This table classifies the first 2,058 errors.

| Kind of real error | Errors |
| --- | --- |
| Wrong argument or assignment type | 1,023 |
| Stale or partial fixture objects | 525 |
| Property that the type does not have | 317 |
| Missing narrowing of null or unknown | 101 |
| Implicit any | 60 |
| Missing name or module | 16 |
| Other | 16 |

### What the type errors hid

Most errors were stale fixtures and loose mocks. These errors hid real
test problems, and this pull request fixes them:

- **A test that never ran.** `instrumentation.test.ts` required
`sdk-trace-base`, which is not installed. So 3 span tests were skipped.
They now run and pass.
- **Assertions that could not fail.**
- `issue-thread-interactions-service` used a company ID as an issue ID.
- `status-card-evaluation-work` compared `[]` with `[]` in a rollback
check.
- `slack-conversation-lifecycle` read `item.issueId`, which does not
exist.
  - `email-channels` used a permission key that does not exist.
- `heartbeat-project-env` imported `LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET`, which is
not exported. The value was undefined.
- **Postgres processes that did not stop.** 11 test files called `stop`
on the test database helper. That method does not exist, and the helper
method is `cleanup`.
- **Arguments that the service ignored.**
- `methodKey` is now `connectionMethodKey` in the Daytona, Unikraft,
1Password, and Railway tests.
- 108 calls passed `"owner-user"` to a parameter that expects an options
object.
- 9 chat wizard fixtures passed `managementContext` as `source`, so they
ran `existing_app` and not `manifest`.
  - 2 tests passed a `{ userId }` actor that the function ignores.
- Inserts into `environments` passed a `companyId` column that the table
does not have.
- **Problems in tests that master added during this work.**
- `sandbox-creation-operations` read `database.connectionString` when an
external test database was set. In that mode `database` is undefined, so
the fixture would stop with a TypeError. It now uses the external URL.
- `idle-completed-history` set a Dot operation to `dispatched`. That is
a Muse status, and the Dot type does not have it. The fixture now uses
`admitted`, which is a real in-flight Dot status.

### Possible product problems, not changed

These may be real problems in production code or types. I did not change
them, because this pull request does not change production behavior:

- `decisions-service` `service.create` does not validate the lenient
`cancel_issue_tree` input.
- `createConnection` ignores `input.connectionPurpose`.
- The `createConnection` route schema default stores `{}` for
`transportConfig`.
- `prepareManagedAiRuntime` accepted the invalid value `mode:
"connection"`.
- `createBinding` accepts invalid `projectionClass` strings outside
class 3.
- `ensureManagedProjectWorkspace` forwards an untyped `repoRef` by
spread.
- `routineVariableSchema.label` is optional, but `RoutineVariable.label`
is required.
- `ToolRunContext.projectId` may be too strict.
- `withdrawInteraction` reads `issue.status`, which its type omits.
- `issueService.list` and `reconcileNativeFinalizations` omit fields
that they return at runtime.
- `createGitHubExternalObjectProvider` handles `tokenProvider: null`,
but its type forbids this value.

## What Changed

- Fixed the 2,168 type errors. The diff changes 322 test and helper
files.
- Corrected `server/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json`. Editors and the
typecheck now read the same options and report the same errors.
- Added three `test-tree` layers to
`server/scripts/typecheck-layers.mjs`. They read the server layers as
declarations, and any error fails them. A hash of the path selects the
shard, so a new file does not move other files.
- Added `server/scripts/typecheck-stubs/daytona-sdk.d.ts`. Server tests
reach Daytona plugin source, and the root install does not have
`@daytonaio/sdk`.
- Changed two imports in `ui/src/lib/issue-execution-policy.ts` to use
`.js` extensions, because server tests import this file.
- Made `declarationsConfig` and `--declarations-only` skip the
`test-tree` layers, because these layers emit nothing. Other projects
read only the source layers. Added a test for this.
- Updated `doc/DEVELOPING.md`.

## Verification

Run these commands:

```sh
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck
pnpm exec vitest run server/scripts/typecheck-layers.test.mjs
```

Results on macOS (arm64), Node 24, 16 cores. Each check ran after the
merge of paperclipai/paperclip#18738 unless the row says otherwise:

| Check | Commit | Result |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Server typecheck, `PAPERCLIP_TYPECHECK_LOW_MEMORY=1`, all 7 layers |
`6e45a08573` | Exit 0, 0 errors, 62 seconds, peak 3.52 GiB |
| `node scripts/typecheck-test-projects.mjs --low-memory` | `a3306bd13e`
| Exit 0, 0 errors, 42 seconds, peak 3.25 GiB |
| The same script with `--reuse-declarations` | `1b878aabc0` | Exit 0, 0
errors |
| `typecheck-layers.test.mjs` and `live-recovery-work.test.ts` |
`01db5634e4` | 90 passed. These include real compiler runs for a pass, a
type error, and an invalid tsconfig. |
| `tsconfig.declarations.json` after a full server typecheck |
`0fb1e4fb0a` | It references only `below`, `cycle`, and `above`. No
generated config names a `tsconfig.layers.json` file. |
| Owned runtime test in `idle-completed-history` | `e8f2f448ac` |
Passed, with the fix that master later replaced |
| `idle-incoming-wake`, `plugin-idle-manager`, and the changed
`chat-channels` test | `6e45a08573` | 30 passed |
| Runner `native-execution.test.ts` | `eab4dcc1f4` | 114 passed |
| The 19 server test files that changed since `eab4dcc1f4`, and
`typecheck-layers.test.mjs` | `259737b700` | 4,275 of 4,277 passed. The
2 failures are in `chat-channels` and are in the list of 7 below. |

The peak is the largest single process, from `/usr/bin/time -l`. Peaks
for the server typecheck were between 3.42 GiB and 3.56 GiB across 8
runs. Peaks for the test projects were 3.25 GiB and 3.37 GiB across 2
runs. I did not measure a cgroup.

**Runtime check of the fixes.** Types do not prove that a test still
works. So I ran all 309 changed server test files, 11,929 tests, before
the rebase onto paperclipai/paperclip#18737:

| Result | Tests | Detail |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Passed | 11,913 | Includes the 2 tests and the 54 `dot-runner` tests
that passed in a later run, as described below. |
| Failed | 7 | The same 7 tests also fail on the commit before the
fixes. |
| Skipped | 9 | These tests have their own skip conditions: `sentry` 5,
and 1 each in `bundled-plugin-registration`, `customer-success-cloud`,
`onepassword-connection`, and `workspace-runtime-https-live-exercise`. |

The 7 tests that fail with and without this change, on my machine:

- 3 tests in `chat-channels` and `email-channels` stop with `ENOENT` on
a `SKILL.md` file. The path is in the parent checkout, above the git
worktree that I used, so I expect that the worktree is the cause. I did
not prove this.
- `workspace-instance-cleanup` compares `/private/var/...` with
`/var/...`. This is a macOS symlink difference.
- 2 tests in `git-reproducible-managed-checkouts` get
`unknown_base_git_files` and expect `unpushed_managed_checkout`. I did
not find the cause.
- 1 more test in `chat-channels`, `materializes direct external-chat
finals once`, gets `undefined`. I did not find the cause.

CI is the check for these 7 tests. `ci / verify` passed on `eab4dcc1f4`.

Failures during this work:

- My fix to `agent-runtime-connector-access` changed an invalid
permission key in the setup, but not in the assertion. The runtime check
found this. I corrected the assertion, and the file passes.
- `heartbeat-plugin-environment` failed one wait in the full run. It
passed three times alone, so I think that load caused the failure. It
can fail again under load.
- `dot-runner` skipped all 54 tests in the full run because `cargo` was
not on my `PATH`. It then passed 54 of 54 with the toolchain on the
`PATH`.
- My first `lib` value removed the default DOM types, and the error
count went up by 375. I added the DOM libraries.
- My Daytona stub with bare `any` left 48 errors, because generic
helpers then inferred `unknown`. I added shapes that return promises.
- One fix to `agent-secrets-routes` used `class_3_static_lease`, and the
test failed. That class allows only specific paths. I reverted to
`unclassified`.
- `ci / General tests (server (8/12))` failed on `259737b700` because of
the flaky port in `idle-completed-history`. paperclipai/paperclip#18853
fixed this test on master, so this pull request keeps that fix.

**Audit of the diff.** I counted these patterns in added and removed
lines, to find fixes that only hide an error:

| Pattern | Added | Removed |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `@ts-ignore` | 0 | 0 |
| `@ts-expect-error` | 0 | 1 |
| `.skip` | 0 | 0 |
| `as any` | 9 | 9 |
| `: any` | 11 | 2 |
| `as never` | 8 | 2 |
| `as unknown as` | 35 | 4 |
| `Promise<unknown>` | 16 | 5 |
| `expect(` | 128 | 113 |

No hunk removes more `expect(` calls than it adds. Three removals of
test content were intentional, and I checked each one:

- `muse-control` removed `signalToken`. Line 1012 already asserts that
it is absent.
- `merged-pr-confirmation-sweep` removed legacy aliases. Other tests
cover them.
- `heartbeat-workspace-branch-containment` removed a `finalize` branch
that no test row can reach.

Some partial fixtures stay unchecked through `as unknown as` and
`Promise<unknown>`, mostly in `issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes`
and `issue-comment-reopen-routes`.

**Accuracy of the check.** One program over the tree and the three
shards reported the same errors at the same positions. Memory, as the
peak of the largest process on one thread, was 3.93 GiB for one program
and 2.43 GiB for the largest shard. I measured these two values before
the fixes.

Not run or not proven:

- I did not run the full `pnpm test:run`, or a root `pnpm build`. I
expect CI to run the full suites.
- I did not run the 4 GiB container check, or the full
`scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs`. The peaks above come from macOS, so
they are not a Linux cgroup measurement.
- I did not run the UI typecheck after the merges.
- `workspace-runtime-https-live-exercise` is skipped, so its `cleanup`
fix did not run.

## Risks

- **A large diff in test files.** 328 files change. A pull request that
edits the same tests can get merge conflicts. New tests on master can
also add type errors before this merges. Any such error fails this check
and needs a fix here.
- **A higher cost for changes to source types.** A change to a type can
add errors in test files that the author did not touch. The author must
then fix them. This is the purpose of the check, but it is new work.
- **Changed test behavior.** Some tests now run paths that they did not
run before, such as the 9 chat wizard fixtures and the 3 span tests.
They pass here, but they can be more sensitive to timing or to the
environment.
- **The Daytona stub can go stale.** The stub is written by hand. If the
plugin uses a new SDK member, the typecheck reports an error until
someone updates the stub.
- **The release path.** `release-verify.yml` and `scripts/release.sh`
run `pnpm -r typecheck`, so they now run this check.
- **The tsconfig change.** The test transform reads
`server/src/__tests__/tsconfig.json`. The options that I changed are for
type checks, and the runs above passed.
- **A gap that remains.** Tsconfigs in `packages/paperclip-runner` and
in most sandbox provider plugins exclude `*.test.ts`. This check does
not read most of those test files, so they can still drift. That work is
separate from this pull request.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with
reasoning, tool use, code execution, and subagents. The runtime does not
show the context window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass (7 tests fail locally, with
and without this change. See Verification.)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-03 15:27:38 -08:00

269 lines
19 KiB
TypeScript

import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
import { eq } from "drizzle-orm";
import { afterAll, beforeAll, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import { agents, companies, createDb, heartbeatRuns, agentWakeupRequests, issues, projects } from "@paperclipai/db";
import { LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET } from "@paperclipai/shared";
import { getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport, startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase } from "./helpers/embedded-postgres.js";
import { createPostgresWatchdogAdapter } from "../modules/active-run-watchdog/adapters/postgres.js";
import { issueService } from "../services/issues.js";
import { authorizationService } from "../services/authorization.js";
import { resolveAndRetainRunTrustPreset } from "../services/run-trust-preset.js";
import { assertLowTrustWorkspaceIsolation } from "../services/low-trust-runtime-containment.js";
import { retainBacklogHumanAssignment, withHumanDirectedWork } from "../services/human-directed-work.js";
import { resolveCoreTrustPreset } from "../services/trust-preset-resolver.js";
const support = await getEmbeddedPostgresTestSupport();
(support.supported ? describe : describe.skip)("human-directed low-trust work", () => {
let database: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase>>;
let db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>;
beforeAll(async () => {
database = await startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase("paperclip-human-work-");
db = createDb(database.connectionString, { maxConnections: 2 });
}, 30_000);
afterAll(async () => { await database?.cleanup(); }, 60_000);
async function seed() {
const companyId = randomUUID();
await db.insert(companies).values({ id: companyId, name: companyId, issuePrefix: companyId.slice(0, 8) });
const [project] = await db.insert(projects).values({ companyId, name: "Contained intake" }).returning();
const [agent] = await db.insert(agents).values({
companyId, name: "Contained agent", role: "engineer", adapterType: "paperclip_runner",
permissions: { authorizationPolicy: { trustPreset: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
trustBoundary: { mode: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET, companyId, projectIds: [project.id] } } },
}).returning();
const [other] = await db.insert(agents).values({ companyId, name: "Other", role: "engineer" }).returning();
return { companyId, agent, other };
}
async function task(f: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof seed>>) {
return issueService(db).create(f.companyId, {
title: `Direct task ${randomUUID()}`, assigneeAgentId: f.agent.id,
createdByUserId: "owner", responsibleUserId: "owner",
});
}
async function execution(f: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof seed>>, issue: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof task>>,
options: { human?: boolean; context?: Record<string, unknown>; retryOfRunId?: string; status?: string } = {}) {
const [wake] = await db.insert(agentWakeupRequests).values({ companyId: f.companyId, agentId: f.agent.id,
source: options.human ? "assignment" : "automation", status: "claimed",
requestedByActorType: options.human ? "user" : "system", requestedByActorId: options.human ? "owner" : null,
payload: { issueId: issue.id, _paperclipWakeContext: { source: "issue.update" } } }).returning();
const [run] = await db.insert(heartbeatRuns).values({ companyId: f.companyId, agentId: f.agent.id,
status: options.status ?? "running", responsibleUserId: "owner", wakeupRequestId: wake.id,
retryOfRunId: options.retryOfRunId, contextSnapshot: { issueId: issue.id, ...options.context } }).returning();
await db.update(agentWakeupRequests).set({ runId: run.id }).where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, wake.id));
return { run, wake, actor: { type: "agent" as const, companyId: f.companyId,
agentId: f.agent.id, source: "agent_key" as const, runId: run.id } };
}
async function launch(f: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof seed>>, issue: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof task>>,
options: Parameters<typeof execution>[2] = {}) {
const current = await execution(f, issue, options);
return { ...current, ...await resolveAndRetainRunTrustPreset(db, {
companyId: f.companyId, agentId: f.agent.id, runId: current.run.id, agent: f.agent, issue,
}) };
}
async function resolve(f: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof seed>>, issue: Parameters<typeof resolveCoreTrustPreset>[0]["issue"], runId: string) {
return withHumanDirectedWork(db, resolveCoreTrustPreset({ companyId: f.companyId, agent: f.agent, issue }),
{ companyId: f.companyId, agentId: f.agent.id, runId });
}
const resource = (issue: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof task>>) => ({ type: "issue" as const,
companyId: issue.companyId, issueId: issue.id, projectId: issue.projectId,
parentIssueId: issue.parentId, assigneeAgentId: issue.assigneeAgentId, status: issue.status });
it("allows the exact human-assigned task at dispatch and tool access; retains containment on retries", async () => {
const f = await seed(); const issue = await task(f);
const first = await launch(f, issue, { human: true });
expect(first.trustPreset).toMatchObject({ kind: "low_trust_review", humanDirectedIssueId: issue.id });
expect(JSON.stringify(first.executionPolicy)).not.toContain("humanDirectedIssueId");
const retried = await resolveAndRetainRunTrustPreset(db, { companyId: f.companyId,
agentId: f.agent.id, runId: first.run.id, agent: f.agent, issue });
expect(retried.trustPreset).toMatchObject(first.trustPreset);
await expect(assertLowTrustWorkspaceIsolation({ db, resolution: first.trustPreset, issue,
isolatedWorkspacesEnabled: true, effectiveExecutionWorkspaceMode: "isolated_workspace",
selectedEnvironmentDriver: "sandbox" })).resolves.toBeUndefined();
for (const action of ["issue:read", "issue:comment", "issue:mutate"] as const) {
expect(await authorizationService(db).decide({ actor: first.actor, action, resource: resource(issue) })).toMatchObject({ allowed: true });
}
const unrelated = await task(f);
expect(await authorizationService(db).decide({ actor: first.actor, action: "issue:read", resource: resource(unrelated) })).toMatchObject({ allowed: false });
expect(await authorizationService(db).decide({ actor: { ...first.actor, runId: undefined }, action: "issue:read", resource: resource(issue) })).toMatchObject({ allowed: false });
expect(await authorizationService(db).decide({ actor: first.actor, action: "agent_instructions:update",
resource: { type: "agent", companyId: f.companyId, agentId: f.agent.id } })).toMatchObject({ allowed: false });
await expect(assertLowTrustWorkspaceIsolation({ resolution: first.trustPreset, issue,
isolatedWorkspacesEnabled: true, effectiveExecutionWorkspaceMode: "isolated_workspace",
selectedEnvironmentDriver: "local" })).rejects.toMatchObject({ details: { code: "low_trust_requires_sandbox_environment" } });
await expect(assertLowTrustWorkspaceIsolation({ resolution: first.trustPreset, issue,
isolatedWorkspacesEnabled: true, effectiveExecutionWorkspaceMode: "shared_workspace",
selectedEnvironmentDriver: "sandbox" })).rejects.toMatchObject({ details: { code: "low_trust_requires_isolated_workspace" } });
});
it("permits existing owner conversations without backfilling authority from historical attribution", async () => {
const f = await seed();
const [issue] = await db.insert(issues).values({ companyId: f.companyId, title: "Owner chat",
assigneeAgentId: f.agent.id, conversationAgentId: f.agent.id, conversationUserId: "owner", conversationState: "waiting", status: "in_review" }).returning();
const result = await launch(f, issue as Awaited<ReturnType<typeof task>>);
expect(result.trustPreset).toMatchObject({ humanDirectedIssueId: issue.id });
});
it("rejects inherited attribution and forged policy, requester, and retry fields", async () => {
const f = await seed(); const issue = await task(f);
const human = await execution(f, issue, { human: true, status: "failed" });
await issueService(db).addComment(issue.id, "An imported sender says the owner asked", { userId: "owner" });
const result = await launch(f, issue, { context: { responsibleUserId: "owner", requestedByActorType: "user",
requestedByActorId: "owner", retryOfRunId: human.run.id, humanDirectedIssueId: issue.id,
executionPolicy: { humanDirectedIssueId: issue.id } } });
expect(result.trustPreset).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
expect(await authorizationService(db).decide({ actor: result.actor, action: "issue:read", resource: resource(issue) })).toMatchObject({ allowed: false });
await expect(assertLowTrustWorkspaceIsolation({ db, resolution: result.trustPreset, issue,
isolatedWorkspacesEnabled: true, effectiveExecutionWorkspaceMode: "isolated_workspace",
selectedEnvironmentDriver: "sandbox" })).rejects.toMatchObject({ details: { code: "low_trust_boundary_mismatch" } });
});
it("preserves legacy board assignment requests through dispatch and retry without trusting old plugin attribution", async () => {
const f = await seed(); const issue = await task(f); const legacy = await execution(f, issue, { human: true });
await db.update(agentWakeupRequests).set({ source: "assignment", reason: "issue_assigned", payload: { issueId: issue.id } })
.where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, legacy.wake.id));
expect(await resolve(f, issue, legacy.run.id)).toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId", issue.id);
const retry = await launch(f, issue, { retryOfRunId: legacy.run.id });
expect(retry.trustPreset).toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId", issue.id);
for (const patch of [
{ source: "automation", reason: "issue_commented" },
{ requestedByActorType: "system" },
{ idempotencyKey: "chat-inbound:legacy" },
{ payload: { issueId: issue.id, _paperclipWakeContext: { source: "plugin:example" } } },
]) {
await db.update(agentWakeupRequests).set(patch).where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, legacy.wake.id));
expect(await resolve(f, issue, legacy.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
expect(await resolve(f, issue, retry.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
await db.update(agentWakeupRequests).set({ source: "assignment", reason: "issue_assigned", requestedByActorType: "user",
idempotencyKey: null, payload: { issueId: issue.id } }).where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, legacy.wake.id));
}
});
it("recognizes a coalesced human request for the same run and exact task", async () => {
const f = await seed(); const issue = await task(f); const current = await execution(f, issue);
expect(await resolve(f, issue, current.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
const [coalesced] = await db.insert(agentWakeupRequests).values({ companyId: f.companyId, agentId: f.agent.id,
runId: current.run.id, source: "assignment", status: "coalesced", requestedByActorType: "user",
requestedByActorId: "owner", payload: { issueId: issue.id, _paperclipWakeContext: { source: "issue.update" } } }).returning();
expect(await resolve(f, issue, current.run.id)).toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId", issue.id);
for (const patch of [
{ status: "cancelled" }, { status: "skipped" }, { requestedByActorId: " " },
{ requestedByActorType: "agent" }, { idempotencyKey: "chat-inbound:external-sender" },
{ payload: { issueId: randomUUID() } },
{ payload: { issueId: issue.id, _paperclipWakeContext: { source: "plugin:untrusted" } } },
{ payload: { issueId: issue.id } }, { companyId: randomUUID() }, { agentId: f.other.id },
]) {
// Existing foreign keys require a real company for the cross-company case.
const badCompany = patch.companyId;
if (badCompany) await db.insert(companies).values({ id: badCompany, name: badCompany });
await db.update(agentWakeupRequests).set(patch).where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, coalesced.id));
expect(await resolve(f, issue, current.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
await db.update(agentWakeupRequests).set({ status: "coalesced", requestedByActorType: "user",
requestedByActorId: "owner", idempotencyKey: null, payload: { issueId: issue.id, _paperclipWakeContext: { source: "issue.update" } },
companyId: f.companyId, agentId: f.agent.id }).where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, coalesced.id));
}
});
it("preserves human authority through durable retry and continuation ancestry", async () => {
const f = await seed(); const issue = await task(f);
const root = await execution(f, issue, { human: true, status: "failed" });
const middle = await execution(f, issue, { retryOfRunId: root.run.id, status: "succeeded" });
const last = await launch(f, issue, { retryOfRunId: middle.run.id });
expect(last.trustPreset).toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId", issue.id);
expect(await authorizationService(db).decide({ actor: last.actor, action: "issue:comment", resource: resource(issue) })).toMatchObject({ allowed: true });
await db.update(heartbeatRuns).set({ status: "cancelled", errorCode: "issue_reassigned" }).where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, middle.run.id));
expect(await resolve(f, issue, last.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
});
it("never borrows retry authority from another task, agent, or company and terminates cycles", async () => {
const f = await seed(); const issue = await task(f); const otherIssue = await task(f);
const otherCompany = await seed();
for (const scope of [
{ fixture: f, issue: otherIssue },
{ fixture: { ...f, agent: { ...f.agent, id: f.other.id } }, issue },
{ fixture: otherCompany, issue: await task(otherCompany) },
]) {
const parent = await execution(scope.fixture, scope.issue, { human: true, status: "failed" });
const child = await launch(f, issue, { retryOfRunId: parent.run.id });
expect(child.trustPreset).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
}
const a = await execution(f, issue); const b = await execution(f, issue, { retryOfRunId: a.run.id });
await db.update(heartbeatRuns).set({ retryOfRunId: b.run.id }).where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, a.run.id));
expect(await resolve(f, issue, a.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
});
it("revokes direction in service/plugin assignment transactions even while the old run remains running", async () => {
const f = await seed(); const issue = await task(f); const first = await execution(f, issue, { human: true });
let release!: () => void; let ready!: () => void;
const held = new Promise<void>((resolve) => { release = resolve; });
const changed = new Promise<void>((resolve) => { ready = resolve; });
const reassignment = db.transaction(async (tx) => {
await issueService(db).update(issue.id, { assigneeAgentId: f.other.id }, tx);
ready(); await held;
});
try {
await Promise.race([changed, reassignment]);
// With the reassignment deliberately held open, reads see the old committed
// assignment and live run together. After commit the wake is revoked even
// without route-level cancellation of the run.
expect(await resolve(f, issue, first.run.id)).toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId", issue.id);
} finally { release(); await reassignment; }
expect(await resolve(f, issue, first.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
await issueService(db).update(issue.id, { assigneeAgentId: f.agent.id });
expect((await db.select().from(heartbeatRuns).where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, first.run.id)))[0].status).toBe("running");
expect((await db.select().from(agentWakeupRequests).where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, first.wake.id)))[0].status).toBe("cancelled");
expect(await resolve(f, issue, first.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
const oldRetry = await launch(f, issue, { retryOfRunId: first.run.id });
expect(oldRetry.trustPreset).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
const automatic = await launch(f, issue);
expect(automatic.trustPreset).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
const human = await launch(f, issue, { human: true });
expect(human.trustPreset).toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId", issue.id);
});
it("a late watchdog success cannot restore a request revoked by reassignment", async () => {
const f = await seed(); const issue = await task(f); const first = await execution(f, issue, { human: true });
await issueService(db).update(issue.id, { assigneeAgentId: f.other.id });
const completed = (await issueService(db).update(issue.id, { assigneeAgentId: f.agent.id, status: "done" }))!;
const watchdog = createPostgresWatchdogAdapter(db);
expect(await watchdog.foldSourceResolvedRun(f.companyId, {
run: { ...first.run, sourceIssueId: issue.id },
sourceIssue: { ...completed, isRecoveryOriginKind: false },
evidence: { kind: "activity", id: randomUUID(), createdAt: new Date(), action: "issue.updated" },
existingEvaluation: null, silenceStartedAt: null, silenceAgeMs: null,
cleanup: { attempted: false, outcome: "no_process_metadata", adapterType: "paperclip_runner" }, now: new Date(),
})).toMatchObject({ kind: "folded" });
expect((await db.select().from(agentWakeupRequests).where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, first.wake.id)))[0].status).toBe("cancelled");
const retry = await launch(f, issue, { retryOfRunId: first.run.id });
expect(retry.trustPreset).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
});
it("retains backlog direction for a later system run and rejects stale or nonhuman assignment callbacks", async () => {
const f = await seed(); const issue = await task(f);
await retainBacklogHumanAssignment(db, issue, { actorType: "agent", actorId: "owner" });
const automatic = await execution(f, issue);
expect(await resolve(f, issue, automatic.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
await retainBacklogHumanAssignment(db, issue, { actorType: "user", actorId: "owner" });
const promoted = (await issueService(db).update(issue.id, { status: "todo" }))!;
expect(await resolve(f, promoted, automatic.run.id)).toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId", issue.id);
await issueService(db).update(issue.id, { assigneeAgentId: f.other.id });
await issueService(db).update(issue.id, { assigneeAgentId: f.agent.id, status: "backlog" });
// A delayed callback holding the original issue snapshot cannot regrant.
await retainBacklogHumanAssignment(db, issue, { actorType: "user", actorId: "owner" });
expect(await resolve(f, issue, automatic.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
});
it("does not authorize a cancelled chat or an uncommitted human request", async () => {
const f = await seed(); const issue = await task(f); const current = await execution(f, issue);
await expect(db.transaction(async (tx) => {
await tx.update(agentWakeupRequests).set({ requestedByActorType: "user", requestedByActorId: "owner" }).where(eq(agentWakeupRequests.id, current.wake.id));
expect(await resolve(f, issue, current.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
throw new Error("rollback sentinel");
})).rejects.toThrow("rollback sentinel");
expect(await resolve(f, issue, current.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
await db.update(issues).set({ conversationAgentId: f.agent.id, conversationUserId: "owner", conversationState: "active" }).where(eq(issues.id, issue.id));
expect(await resolve(f, issue, current.run.id)).toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId", issue.id);
await db.update(heartbeatRuns).set({ status: "cancelled" }).where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, current.run.id));
expect(await resolve(f, issue, current.run.id)).not.toHaveProperty("humanDirectedIssueId");
});
});