Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/services/chat-github-management.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip 8813a50105 feat: run GitHub review bots through Paperclip agents (#13717)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agent work as tasks and runs.
> - GitHub chat brings repository conversations into those tasks.
> - A review bot needs the assigned agent, its authority, and governed
provider tools.
> - The existing channel connection did not supply that review workflow
or a complete setup journey.
> - This pull request adds GitHub App setup, account access, event
prompts, task-bound review tools, and exact-commit checks.
> - Operators can inspect each review through the same task, run, and
activity systems.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

GitHub chat, governed connection tools, task execution, shared/database
contracts, and connector setup UI.

**Problem or motivation**

Operators need a GitHub review bot that runs their assigned Paperclip
agent. Mentions and PR events must preserve task ownership and requester
authority. Provider publication must use the bot App identity and
enforce the configured permissions.

**Proposed solution**

Extend the existing GitHub chat connector with resumable App onboarding,
linked-member and sponsored-guest access, editable event prompts, and
governed review operations. Validate structured assessments on the
server and compute a stable Paperclip Review check for the exact head
commit.

**Alternatives considered**

A separate review scheduler would duplicate Paperclip execution and
permissions. Reusing personal GitHub credentials would change the bot
identity and credential boundary.

**Roadmap alignment**

This extends the existing Connected Apps and governed-tool
infrastructure. The project owner requested and approved this design.
Related PR #8645 imports external Codex review feedback; this change
runs an assigned Paperclip agent and publishes its results through the
existing chat connector.

## What Changed

- Include the current Paperclip instance origin in the copied setup
prompt. Storybook uses its configured Paperclip origin; callback
parameters and URL credentials are excluded.

- Add a Claude/Codex copy button in the real setup and Storybook opening
step. Its detailed prompt asks four setup questions and guides
embedded-browser setup, verification, and optional required checks.
Clipboard failure exposes selectable instructions.
- Add a tutorial that explains why App installation, review scheduling,
and required checks are separate choices.

- Add manifest registration, an existing-App path, separate installation
and repository selection, repository refresh, and explicit account
confirmation.
- Add low-trust agent guidance, effective capability verification,
member selection, and explicit restricted guests with a sponsor.
- Add configurable PR events, prompts, repository overrides, rating
thresholds, and separate formal-review permissions.
- Give the assigned agent governed App tools to read PRs, comment, begin
an assessment, submit findings, and optionally submit a formal review.
- Bind review history, root PR events, and inline replies to ordinary
tasks. Deduplicate deliveries/findings and reject stale publication.
- Link check Details to the underlying task on the current trusted
hostname, or to Reviews before task creation.
- Add schema migration 0283, API contracts, production UI, and 49
interactive Storybook states.
- Repair local lease recovery. Keep the Cloud Dockerfile identical to
master; no provider-pack layer or runtime-default environment variable
is added.
- Retry only rolled-back wake-admission transactions after transient
endpoint-lock contention. A deterministic held-lock regression proves
one accepted wake.

## Verification

- Current head: `7ba761fe007bb798400d3e62346fa964f607f0f8`, rebased on
master `d9b3a5653e41f2ee5a1345b97c86a238f7a5c8e9`. Dockerfile has zero
diff against master. Final workspace typecheck and build passed. The new
PostgreSQL migration regression passed and preserves existing relation
and constraint identities after replay.
- Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5. There are zero unresolved
review threads and no merge conflicts.
- All current-head checks are green: 54 passed and two conditional
Storybook jobs skipped. This includes complete server/workspace test
suites, build, typechecks, policy checks, Runner suites, browser suites,
and security status. One timing-sensitive callback-ordering test passed
in isolation and its CI shard passed one retry. The duplicate local
full-suite run was stopped after CI completed; it is not counted as a
local full-suite pass.
- Before the final Slack rebase and migration renumbering, 186 focused
GitHub tests, 14 native bootstrap cases, token gates, and Storybook
build passed. The final rebase retained the new Slack communication
guidance.
- The embedded-browser setup test copied the full detailed prompt,
including the configured Paperclip instance URL. Desktop and narrow
layouts were checked. Component tests cover successful copying and
clipboard failure with selectable text and retry.
- Live local and hosted GitHub acceptance evidence refers to application
revision `cb703ac959876a07ebf3d7a295847f9f351eb6fc`. Real agent tasks
exercised issue mentions, automatic PR reviews, inline findings,
repeated mentions, task continuation, and failing-to-passing checks
after a push. The Storybook agent generated, built, and browser-rendered
pages; missing acceptance text failed, matching text passed, and broken
JSX produced an incomplete result.
- Live cases also covered independently disabled push events, prompt
injection, duplicate signed deliveries, rapid pushes, stale-result
rejection, finding deduplication, and restart recovery. Formal reviews
were denied while disabled and published only after explicit enablement.
Check Details links pointed to the underlying task on the trusted
hostname.
- Those hosted native Claude runs used the provider-pack layer now
removed from this PR. They do not prove native Claude works on the
standard Cloud image. A replacement hosted native Codex run is not yet
verified: the disposable QA tenant has only an Anthropic AI connection.
No new staging or production deployment was made for the packaging
removal.
- Required-check merge enforcement could not be tested because the
private disposable repository's GitHub plan rejected the rules
configuration. Published success/failure/incomplete check states were
verified directly.

## Risks

- Latest master allocated migration 0282 to Slack. The GitHub migration
is regenerated as 0283 with replay-safe table/index/constraint creation;
a PostgreSQL regression verifies existing relations and constraints are
preserved. Existing preview tenants remain subject to the fleet
migration-history compatibility preflight; no bypass is introduced.

- Migration 0283 adds company-scoped configuration, registration,
review, and publication records. Existing connections retain their
behavior until reviews/tools are enabled.
- Signed webhooks and expiring registration state remain required.
Hosted installations also need the companion narrow Cloud gateway
exemptions.
- Agent assessments can be incomplete or wrong. The server enforces
coverage/result structure, current-head publication, rating policy, and
separate formal-review permission; it does not replace code-review
judgment.
- No Cloud image packaging changes are included. Remote native
ACPX/Claude and OpenCode retain their existing operator-supplied
provider-pack prerequisite. Native Codex and Codex with managed MCP
tools do not require that pack. Earlier staging deployment evidence
refers to its stated revision, not this packaging-removal head.
Production rollout and merging remain outside this change.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository, code execution, API, and
embedded-browser tools. The exact serving model ID and context-window
size were not exposed by the environment.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-21 14:41:19 -05:00

630 lines
22 KiB
TypeScript

import { githubBotCredentials } from "./chat-github-client.js";
import { toolAccessPolicyService } from "./tool-access-policy.js";
import { agents, toolCatalogEntries } from "@paperclipai/db";
import { GITHUB_BOT_TOOLS, syncGitHubBotTools } from "./chat-github-tools.js";
import { and, desc, eq, sql } from "drizzle-orm";
import {
chatEndpoints,
chatEndpointResources,
chatExternalPrincipals,
chatIdentityLinks,
chatGitHubConfigurations,
chatGitHubReviews,
companyMemberships,
connectionGrants,
toolConnections,
type Db,
} from "@paperclipai/db";
import {
defaultGitHubReviewPolicy,
updateGitHubChatConfigurationSchema,
type GitHubChatConfiguration,
} from "@paperclipai/shared";
import { badRequest, conflict, forbidden, notFound } from "../errors.js";
import { toolAccessService } from "./tool-access.js";
import { logActivity } from "./activity-log.js";
import { githubBotRequest } from "./chat-github-client.js";
import { environmentService } from "./environments.js";
import { instanceSettingsService } from "./instance-settings.js";
import { resolveExecutionWorkspaceEnvironmentId } from "./execution-workspace-policy.js";
export function githubChatManagementService(db: Db, fetchImpl = fetch) {
async function endpoint(id: string) {
const [row] = await db
.select()
.from(chatEndpoints)
.where(
and(eq(chatEndpoints.id, id), eq(chatEndpoints.provider, "github")),
);
if (!row || row.status === "archived")
throw notFound("GitHub bot not found");
return row;
}
async function member(companyId: string, userId: string) {
const [row] = await db
.select()
.from(companyMemberships)
.where(
and(
eq(companyMemberships.companyId, companyId),
eq(companyMemberships.principalType, "user"),
eq(companyMemberships.principalId, userId),
eq(companyMemberships.status, "active"),
),
);
if (!row || row.membershipRole === "viewer")
throw forbidden(
"An active company member with permission to start work is required",
);
return row;
}
async function configuration(endpointId: string, userId: string) {
const bot = await endpoint(endpointId);
const [saved] = await db
.select()
.from(chatGitHubConfigurations)
.where(
and(
eq(chatGitHubConfigurations.companyId, bot.companyId),
eq(chatGitHubConfigurations.endpointId, endpointId),
),
);
return (
saved ?? {
endpointId,
companyId: bot.companyId,
revision: 0,
configuration: {
version: 1,
toolsEnabled: false,
responsibleUserId: userId,
memberAccess: "all_linked",
people: [],
defaults: defaultGitHubReviewPolicy(),
repositories: {},
} satisfies GitHubChatConfiguration,
}
);
}
async function saveConfiguration(
endpointId: string,
input: unknown,
userId: string,
) {
const bot = await endpoint(endpointId);
await member(bot.companyId, userId);
const parsed = updateGitHubChatConfigurationSchema.parse(input);
const config = parsed.configuration;
await member(bot.companyId, config.responsibleUserId);
for (const person of config.people) {
if (person.kind === "guest") {
await member(bot.companyId, person.sponsorUserId);
continue;
}
await member(bot.companyId, person.userId);
const [linked] = await db
.select({ externalId: chatExternalPrincipals.externalId })
.from(chatIdentityLinks)
.innerJoin(
chatExternalPrincipals,
eq(chatExternalPrincipals.id, chatIdentityLinks.principalId),
)
.where(
and(
eq(chatIdentityLinks.companyId, bot.companyId),
eq(chatIdentityLinks.endpointId, endpointId),
eq(chatIdentityLinks.paperclipUserId, person.userId),
eq(chatIdentityLinks.status, "linked"),
eq(chatExternalPrincipals.externalId, person.githubUserId),
),
);
if (!linked)
throw badRequest(
"Each member must connect and confirm their own GitHub account before being added",
);
}
const resources = await db
.select()
.from(chatEndpointResources)
.where(
and(
eq(chatEndpointResources.companyId, bot.companyId),
eq(chatEndpointResources.endpointId, endpointId),
),
);
const repositoryIds = new Set(
resources.map((resource) =>
String(resource.metadata?.providerRepositoryId ?? ""),
),
);
if (Object.keys(config.repositories).some((id) => !repositoryIds.has(id)))
throw badRequest(
"Repository overrides must refer to this App installation",
);
await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
await tx
.select({ id: chatEndpoints.id })
.from(chatEndpoints)
.where(eq(chatEndpoints.id, endpointId))
.for("update");
await tx.execute(
sql`select pg_advisory_xact_lock(hashtextextended(${`github-config:${endpointId}`}, 0))`,
);
const [current] = await tx
.select()
.from(chatGitHubConfigurations)
.where(eq(chatGitHubConfigurations.endpointId, endpointId))
.for("update");
if ((current?.revision ?? 0) !== parsed.expectedRevision)
throw conflict("This configuration changed. Refresh before saving.");
const values = {
companyId: bot.companyId,
endpointId,
revision: parsed.expectedRevision + 1,
configuration: config,
updatedByUserId: userId,
updatedAt: new Date(),
};
await tx
.insert(chatGitHubConfigurations)
.values(values)
.onConflictDoUpdate({
target: chatGitHubConfigurations.endpointId,
set: values,
});
// The list controls admission; this flag enables the existing restricted
// guest execution path only when an explicit guest is present.
await tx
.update(chatEndpoints)
.set({
allowUnlinkedPeople: config.people.some((p) => p.kind === "guest"),
sponsorUserId: config.responsibleUserId,
updatedAt: new Date(),
})
.where(eq(chatEndpoints.id, endpointId));
await syncGitHubBotTools(tx, bot, userId, config.toolsEnabled);
await logActivity(tx as unknown as Db, {
companyId: bot.companyId,
actorType: "user",
actorId: userId,
action: "chat_github.configuration_updated",
entityType: "tool_connection",
entityId: bot.connectionId,
details: { endpointId, revision: values.revision },
});
});
return configuration(endpointId, userId);
}
async function personalConnections(endpointId: string, userId: string) {
const bot = await endpoint(endpointId);
await member(bot.companyId, userId);
const rows = await db
.select({ connection: toolConnections, grant: connectionGrants })
.from(connectionGrants)
.innerJoin(
toolConnections,
and(
eq(toolConnections.id, connectionGrants.connectionId),
eq(toolConnections.companyId, bot.companyId),
),
)
.where(
and(
eq(connectionGrants.companyId, bot.companyId),
eq(connectionGrants.kind, "user"),
eq(connectionGrants.subjectUserId, userId),
),
);
return rows
.filter(
({ connection }) =>
connection.config.sourceTemplateKey === "github" ||
connection.transportConfig?.sourceTemplateKey === "github",
)
.map(({ connection, grant }) => ({
connectionId: connection.id,
name: connection.name,
status: grant.status,
login: grant.providerTenant?.github?.login ?? null,
enabled: connection.enabled,
}));
}
async function identity(
endpointId: string,
connectionId: string,
userId: string,
confirmedGithubUserId?: string,
) {
const bot = await endpoint(endpointId);
await member(bot.companyId, userId);
if (!bot.providerAccountId)
throw conflict("Verify the bot App installation first");
const verified = await toolAccessService(db).verifyPersonalGitHubIdentity(
bot.companyId,
connectionId,
userId,
);
if (confirmedGithubUserId === undefined) return verified;
if (confirmedGithubUserId !== verified.githubUserId)
throw conflict(
"The connected GitHub account changed. Check and confirm its identity again.",
);
await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
const [principal] = await tx
.insert(chatExternalPrincipals)
.values({
companyId: bot.companyId,
provider: "github",
providerAccountId: bot.providerAccountId!,
externalId: verified.githubUserId,
kind: "user",
handle: verified.login,
displayName: verified.login,
})
.onConflictDoUpdate({
target: [
chatExternalPrincipals.companyId,
chatExternalPrincipals.provider,
chatExternalPrincipals.providerAccountId,
chatExternalPrincipals.externalId,
],
set: { handle: verified.login, updatedAt: new Date() },
})
.returning();
await tx.execute(
sql`select pg_advisory_xact_lock(hashtextextended(${`chat-identity:${bot.companyId}:${principal!.id}`}, 0))`,
);
const [prior] = await tx
.select()
.from(chatIdentityLinks)
.where(
and(
eq(chatIdentityLinks.endpointId, endpointId),
eq(chatIdentityLinks.principalId, principal!.id),
),
)
.for("update");
if (prior?.status === "linked" && prior.paperclipUserId !== userId)
throw conflict(
"This GitHub account is already linked to another Paperclip member",
);
const [grant] = await tx
.select()
.from(connectionGrants)
.where(
and(
eq(connectionGrants.companyId, bot.companyId),
eq(connectionGrants.id, verified.grantId),
eq(connectionGrants.status, "active"),
eq(connectionGrants.subjectUserId, userId),
),
)
.for("update");
if (!grant)
throw forbidden("Your personal GitHub connection was revoked");
const values = {
companyId: bot.companyId,
endpointId,
principalId: principal!.id,
paperclipUserId: userId,
status: "linked" as const,
confirmedAt: new Date(),
revokedAt: null,
confirmationTokenHash: null,
expiresAt: null,
updatedAt: new Date(),
};
await tx
.insert(chatIdentityLinks)
.values(values)
.onConflictDoUpdate({
target: [chatIdentityLinks.endpointId, chatIdentityLinks.principalId],
set: values,
});
await logActivity(tx as unknown as Db, {
companyId: bot.companyId,
actorType: "user",
actorId: userId,
action: "chat_github.identity_confirmed",
entityType: "tool_connection",
entityId: bot.connectionId,
details: {
endpointId,
connectionId,
githubUserId: verified.githubUserId,
},
});
});
return verified;
}
return {
verification: async (endpointId: string) => {
const bot = await endpoint(endpointId);
const checks: Array<{
key: string;
label: string;
ok: boolean;
detail: string;
}> = [];
checks.push({
key: "delivery",
label: "Signed webhook delivery",
ok: !!bot.setup.webhookVerifiedAt,
detail: bot.setup.webhookVerifiedAt
? "GitHub delivered a signed webhook to this instance."
: "Send or redeliver a ping from your App's webhook settings.",
});
const credentials = await githubBotCredentials(
db,
bot.companyId,
endpointId,
);
const app = await githubBotRequest<{
id?: number;
permissions?: Record<string, string>;
events?: string[];
}>(fetchImpl, credentials.appJwt, "/app");
checks.push({
key: "app",
label: "GitHub App identity",
ok: String(app.id) === bot.botExternalId,
detail:
String(app.id) === bot.botExternalId
? "The vaulted credentials identify this bot's App."
: "The vaulted credentials identify a different GitHub App.",
});
const installation = credentials.credentials.installationId
? await githubBotRequest<{
permissions?: Record<string, string>;
suspended_at?: string | null;
}>(
fetchImpl,
credentials.appJwt,
`/app/installations/${credentials.credentials.installationId}`,
)
: null;
const permissions = installation?.permissions ?? {};
const permissionsOk =
!!installation &&
!installation.suspended_at &&
permissions.contents === "read" &&
permissions.pull_requests === "write" &&
permissions.checks === "write" &&
app.events?.includes("pull_request") === true;
checks.push({
key: "permissions",
label: "Review installation permissions",
ok: permissionsOk,
detail: permissionsOk
? "Contents read, Pull requests write, Checks write, and PR events are enabled."
: "Set Contents to read-only and Checks to write, subscribe to pull_request, and approve the permission upgrade on GitHub.",
});
const resources = await db
.select()
.from(chatEndpointResources)
.where(
and(
eq(chatEndpointResources.companyId, bot.companyId),
eq(chatEndpointResources.endpointId, endpointId),
eq(chatEndpointResources.enabled, true),
),
);
const inaccessible: string[] = [];
// Ask GitHub to authorize the selected repository IDs now. A cached
// inventory alone cannot prove access after an installation is changed.
for (let offset = 0; offset < resources.length; offset += 4) {
await Promise.all(
resources.slice(offset, offset + 4).map(async (resource) => {
const repositoryId = String(
resource.metadata?.providerRepositoryId ?? "",
);
try {
if (
!permissionsOk ||
resource.availability !== "available" ||
!/^[1-9][0-9]*$/.test(repositoryId) ||
!Number.isSafeInteger(Number(repositoryId))
)
throw new Error("Unavailable repository");
const issued = await githubBotRequest<{ token?: string }>(
fetchImpl,
credentials.appJwt,
`/app/installations/${credentials.credentials.installationId}/access_tokens`,
{
method: "POST",
body: {
repository_ids: [Number(repositoryId)],
permissions: {
contents: "read",
metadata: "read",
issues: "write",
pull_requests: "write",
checks: "write",
},
},
},
);
if (!issued.token) throw new Error("Missing installation token");
} catch {
inaccessible.push(resource.label ?? resource.providerResourceId);
}
}),
);
}
checks.push({
key: "repositories",
label: "Enabled repositories",
ok: resources.length > 0 && inaccessible.length === 0,
detail: inaccessible.length
? `Restore installation access and refresh: ${inaccessible.join(", ")}.`
: resources.length
? `GitHub confirmed review access to all ${resources.length} enabled repositories.`
: "Enable at least one repository from the App installation.",
});
const [agent] = await db
.select()
.from(agents)
.where(
and(
eq(agents.companyId, bot.companyId),
eq(agents.id, bot.assignedAgentId),
),
);
checks.push({
key: "runtime",
label: "Agent runtime supports bot tools",
ok:
!!agent &&
["paperclip_runner", "codex_local"].includes(agent.adapterType),
detail:
"Use Paperclip Runner or Codex with managed MCP tools. Low-trust execution also requires a valid scoped boundary and isolated sandbox; the test task proves runtime execution.",
});
const [savedConfig] = await db
.select()
.from(chatGitHubConfigurations)
.where(eq(chatGitHubConfigurations.endpointId, endpointId));
if (
agent &&
(agent.permissions.trustPreset === "low_trust_review" ||
savedConfig?.configuration.people.some(
(person) => person.kind === "guest",
))
) {
const settings = instanceSettingsService(db);
const experimental = await settings.getExperimental();
const environments = environmentService(db);
const local = await environments.ensureLocalEnvironment(bot.companyId);
const managed = experimental.enableManagedSandboxOnly
? await environments.findManagedSandboxEnvironment(bot.companyId)
: null;
const selected = resolveExecutionWorkspaceEnvironmentId({
agentDefaultEnvironmentId: agent.defaultEnvironmentId,
instanceDefaultEnvironmentId:
(await settings.get()).defaultEnvironmentId ?? null,
localDefaultEnvironmentId: local.id,
managedSandboxOnly: experimental.enableManagedSandboxOnly,
managedSandboxEnvironmentId: managed?.id,
});
const environment = await environments.getById(selected.environmentId);
const owners = environment
? await environments.listBoundCompanyIds(environment.id)
: [];
const sandboxOk =
experimental.enableIsolatedWorkspaces &&
environment?.driver === "sandbox" &&
environment.status === "active" &&
(!owners.length || owners.includes(bot.companyId));
checks.push({
key: "isolation",
label: "Low-trust and guest execution",
ok: !!sandboxOk,
detail: sandboxOk
? "An active sandbox environment is selected. Each task receives its own restricted trust boundary."
: "Enable isolated workspaces and select an active sandbox environment for this agent before running low-trust or guest tasks.",
});
}
const entries = await db
.select()
.from(toolCatalogEntries)
.where(
and(
eq(toolCatalogEntries.companyId, bot.companyId),
eq(toolCatalogEntries.connectionId, bot.connectionId),
eq(toolCatalogEntries.status, "active"),
),
);
const requiredTools = GITHUB_BOT_TOOLS.filter(
(tool) => tool.name !== "formal_review",
);
const denied: string[] = requiredTools
.filter(
(tool) =>
!entries.some(
(entry) =>
entry.toolName === tool.name &&
entry.name === `github_bot:${tool.name}`,
),
)
.map((tool) => tool.title);
let toolsOk = denied.length === 0;
for (const entry of entries) {
const decision = await toolAccessPolicyService(db).decide({
companyId: bot.companyId,
actor: {
actorType: "agent",
actorId: bot.assignedAgentId,
agentId: bot.assignedAgentId,
},
runContext: {},
request: {
toolName: `github-bot.${bot.id}:${entry.toolName}`,
applicationId: credentials.connection.applicationId,
applicationKey: "github-chat",
connectionId: bot.connectionId,
catalogEntryId: entry.id,
providerType: "paperclip_github_chat",
upstreamToolName: entry.toolName,
riskLevel: entry.riskLevel,
arguments: {},
sideEffecting: entry.riskLevel !== "read",
},
});
if (
entry.toolName !== "formal_review" &&
!decision.allowed &&
decision.decision !== "require_approval"
) {
toolsOk = false;
denied.push(entry.title ?? entry.toolName);
}
}
checks.push({
key: "tools",
label: "Assigned agent's effective GitHub tools",
ok: toolsOk,
detail: toolsOk
? "The bot App's task-scoped tools are assigned. Each run and publication rechecks access."
: denied.length
? `Repair tool policy for: ${denied.join(", ")}.`
: "Assign the bot's GitHub tools to this agent, then verify again.",
});
return { checks, ready: checks.every((check) => check.ok) };
},
configuration,
saveConfiguration,
personalConnections,
identity,
lookupPerson: async (login: string) => {
if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9-]{0,38}(?:\[bot\])?$/.test(login))
throw badRequest("Enter a GitHub username");
const user = await githubBotRequest<{
id?: number;
login?: string;
type?: string;
}>(fetchImpl, null, `/users/${encodeURIComponent(login)}`);
if (
!Number.isSafeInteger(user.id) ||
!user.id ||
!["User", "Bot"].includes(user.type ?? "") ||
!user.login
)
throw badRequest("Choose a GitHub person or bot account");
return { githubUserId: String(user.id), login: user.login };
},
reviews: async (endpointId: string) => {
const bot = await endpoint(endpointId);
return db
.select()
.from(chatGitHubReviews)
.where(
and(
eq(chatGitHubReviews.companyId, bot.companyId),
eq(chatGitHubReviews.endpointId, endpointId),
),
)
.orderBy(desc(chatGitHubReviews.createdAt))
.limit(100);
},
};
}