mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-07 07:23:08 +02:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
ad474abece
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server tests cover issue routes and execution workspace state > - The closed-workspace route suite reloads a mocked module graph before each test > - CPU contention can bind one test to the real service and hide a 500 response > - This pull request loads the mocked graph once and checks exact success statuses > - The benefit is a stable suite that detects route failures instead of accepting them ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The closed-workspace issue route suite reloaded and unmocked the module graph before each test. Under CPU contention, a route could bind to the real execution-workspaces service. The request then returned `500`, while a weak assertion accepted the result. **Expected behavior** The suite must use the configured service mocks for every test. Each success case must assert its exact expected HTTP status. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run the closed-workspace route suite many times in parallel. 2. Use CPU contention during the run. 3. Observe intermittent failures or weak assertions that accept `500` responses. **Paperclip version or commit** Commit `0d5686b942f1d1366112cb922f95e5c8622bb9a6`. **Deployment mode** Built from source with the server test runner. **Installation method** Built from source. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific. **Database mode** Not database-related. **Additional context** This pull request relates to [#11472](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/11472). It does not change product code. ## What Changed - Load the mocked service graph once per file with `hoistModuleGraph`. - Remove the per-test module reset and unmock cycle. - Assert exact success statuses for the three affected responses. - Add the missing `refreshReopenPendingConsumption` mock. - Use one named timeout constant for every `vi.waitFor` call. - Replace `setImmediate` barriers with fake-timer advances. ## Verification - `npx vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/issue-closed-workspace-routes.test.ts` passes 12 of 12 tests locally. - A 200-sample sweep with 20 parallel copies passed with zero failures. - An independent 100-sample sweep with 20 parallel copies passed with zero failures. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server` reports the same 61 pre-existing errors with and without this change. - GitHub Actions must run the full server suite for final verification. ## Risks Low risk. This pull request changes one test file and does not change product code. The stricter assertions can expose a real route failure that the old suite hid. ## Model Used Codex, GPT-5, tool use and code review assistance. The exact context window and reasoning mode are not available in this handoff. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>