mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-15 03:51:22 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - External tools need explicit identity and access boundaries. > - Shared connection credentials cannot represent every user-scoped use case. > - Grants must stay company-scoped and support safe delegation. > - This pull request adds connection grants, identity rules, and their database contract. > - The benefit is durable control over which identity an agent may use. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11965 This is stack 3 of 11. It depends on stack 2 and replaces another reviewable part of #11965. ## What Changed - Add company and user connection grants. - Add delegated identity and membership rules. - Synchronize database, shared, server, and UI contracts. - Register the grant-member replacement route in the OpenAPI surface in the same layer that mounts it. - Add migration 0231 with replay-safe guards and coverage. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts` (5 passed) - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db check:migrations` - `pnpm build` ## Risks - Incorrect grant selection could expose the wrong credential scope. - The service enforces company and subject boundaries before credential use. - Migration 0231 is generated, ordered after 0230, and safe to replay. > I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This stack continues the existing app connection work from #11965 and does not duplicate another planned item. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime model ID and context window were not exposed. The model used reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked a public issue or pull request with `Refs #` - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
182 lines
6.8 KiB
TypeScript
182 lines
6.8 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience,
|
|
issueThreadInteractionAttentionAgentAllowed,
|
|
} from "./issue-thread-interaction-resolution.js";
|
|
|
|
const agent = { type: "agent", agentId: "agent-1", runId: "run-1" } as const;
|
|
|
|
function interaction(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
|
return {
|
|
createdByAgentId: "agent-1",
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
sourceRunId: "run-1",
|
|
addresseeAgentId: null,
|
|
addresseeUserId: null,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: "anyone",
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe("issue-thread interaction resolver audience", () => {
|
|
it.each([
|
|
"suggest_tasks",
|
|
"ask_user_questions",
|
|
"request_confirmation",
|
|
"request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
"request_item_verdicts",
|
|
])("allows the creator and creating run under anyone for %s", () => {
|
|
expect(evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: agent,
|
|
interaction: interaction(),
|
|
})).toMatchObject({ allowed: true, effectiveResolverPolicy: "anyone", reason: "allow_anyone" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each([
|
|
["creator agent", { createdByAgentId: "agent-1", sourceRunId: "run-other" }],
|
|
["creating run", { createdByAgentId: "agent-other", sourceRunId: "run-1" }],
|
|
])("excludes the %s only when not_creator is effective", (_name, creator) => {
|
|
const decision = evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: agent,
|
|
interaction: interaction({ ...creator, effectiveResolverPolicy: "not_creator" }),
|
|
});
|
|
expect(decision).toMatchObject({ allowed: false, code: "interaction_creator_excluded" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("enforces an explicit addressee", () => {
|
|
const decision = evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: agent,
|
|
interaction: interaction({ addresseeAgentId: "agent-2" }),
|
|
});
|
|
expect(decision).toMatchObject({ allowed: false, code: "interaction_addressee_mismatch" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows only the addressed user to resolve a user-addressed interaction", () => {
|
|
expect(evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: { type: "user", userId: "alice" },
|
|
interaction: interaction({ addresseeUserId: "alice", effectiveResolverPolicy: "human_only" }),
|
|
})).toMatchObject({ allowed: true, reason: "allow_addressee" });
|
|
|
|
expect(evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: { type: "user", userId: "bob" },
|
|
interaction: interaction({ addresseeUserId: "alice", effectiveResolverPolicy: "human_only" }),
|
|
})).toMatchObject({ allowed: false, code: "interaction_addressee_mismatch" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("requires run attribution for agents", () => {
|
|
const decision = evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: { type: "agent", agentId: "agent-1", runId: null },
|
|
interaction: interaction(),
|
|
});
|
|
expect(decision).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
status: 422,
|
|
code: "interaction_run_attribution_required",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows a server-derived restriction to narrow but never widen the audience", () => {
|
|
expect(evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: agent,
|
|
interaction: interaction({ createdByAgentId: "agent-other", sourceRunId: "run-other" }),
|
|
additionalRestriction: "human_only",
|
|
})).toMatchObject({ allowed: false, code: "interaction_human_only" });
|
|
|
|
expect(evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: agent,
|
|
interaction: interaction({ effectiveResolverPolicy: "human_only" }),
|
|
additionalRestriction: "anyone",
|
|
})).toMatchObject({ allowed: false, code: "interaction_human_only" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("intersects human-only and creator-separation restrictions", () => {
|
|
expect(evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: { type: "user", userId: "user-1" },
|
|
interaction: interaction({
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "user-1",
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: "not_creator",
|
|
}),
|
|
additionalRestriction: "human_only",
|
|
})).toMatchObject({ allowed: false, code: "interaction_creator_excluded" });
|
|
|
|
expect(evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: { type: "user", userId: "user-1" },
|
|
interaction: interaction({
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: "user-1",
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: "human_only",
|
|
}),
|
|
additionalRestriction: "not_creator",
|
|
})).toMatchObject({ allowed: false, code: "interaction_creator_excluded" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("excludes the review requester when a review card has null creator columns", () => {
|
|
const restriction = {
|
|
policy: "not_creator",
|
|
excludedActor: { type: "user", id: "review-requester" },
|
|
source: "issue_review",
|
|
} as const;
|
|
expect(evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: { type: "user", userId: "review-requester" },
|
|
interaction: interaction({
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
sourceRunId: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
additionalRestriction: restriction,
|
|
})).toMatchObject({
|
|
allowed: false,
|
|
code: "review_policy_denied",
|
|
details: {
|
|
policy: "not_creator",
|
|
allowedActor: "writer_other_than_review_requester",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: { type: "user", userId: "peer-reviewer" },
|
|
interaction: interaction({
|
|
createdByAgentId: null,
|
|
createdByUserId: null,
|
|
sourceRunId: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
additionalRestriction: restriction,
|
|
})).toMatchObject({ allowed: true, effectiveResolverPolicy: "not_creator" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("keeps governed actions independently human-only", () => {
|
|
const decision = evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: agent,
|
|
interaction: interaction(),
|
|
governedAction: true,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(decision).toMatchObject({ allowed: false, code: "interaction_governed_action_denied" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("preserves legacy inherited board_or_agents creator separation", () => {
|
|
const decision = evaluateIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: agent,
|
|
interaction: interaction({
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: "board_or_agents",
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance: "legacy_inherited_restriction",
|
|
}),
|
|
});
|
|
expect(decision).toMatchObject({ allowed: false, code: "interaction_creator_excluded" });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("derives agent attention ownership from the same effective audience", () => {
|
|
expect(issueThreadInteractionAttentionAgentAllowed({
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
interaction: interaction(),
|
|
})).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(issueThreadInteractionAttentionAgentAllowed({
|
|
agentId: "agent-1",
|
|
interaction: interaction({ effectiveResolverPolicy: "not_creator" }),
|
|
})).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(issueThreadInteractionAttentionAgentAllowed({
|
|
agentId: "agent-2",
|
|
interaction: interaction({ effectiveResolverPolicy: "human_only" }),
|
|
})).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|