mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 10:48:12 +02:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
5f1100e3b3
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Operators can extend its interface through trusted plugin UI contributions. > - The server also accepts executable HTML through two legacy environment settings. > - This older path bypasses the plugin installation and lifecycle model. > - This pull request removes snippet injection from static and development pages. > - Operators must migrate existing integrations before upgrading. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Retire the operator HTML injection path from the server. Related public changes: #13168, #13245 and #13496 introduced the legacy settings; #13646 supplies the generic plugin host contract. **Current behavior** Managed instances append operator-supplied HTML or a decoded script body to every page. The same integration can use supported trusted plugin UI slots. **Proposed behavior** Ignore both retired settings. Serve normal branded static and development HTML, and keep plugin contributions unchanged. **Breaking changes** Installations that rely on `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_UI_SNIPPET` or `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_UI_SNIPPET_B64` must migrate before upgrading. The maintainer-owned staging and production deployments have completed the migration prerequisite. Other operators must migrate their integrations before adopting this change. ## What Changed - Remove the snippet injector and its static/dev rendering integration. - Remove injector-specific tests and retain a regression that old settings no longer change served HTML. - Replace setup instructions with a retirement and plugin-migration note. ## Verification - Rebased onto current master; `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/static-index-html.test.ts server/src/__tests__/vite-html-renderer.test.ts`: 5 tests passed. - With repository-pinned Rust/Cargo installed, full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass after rebase. - Previous full local `pnpm test:run` encountered unrelated macOS runtime-cache rename `EACCES` errors and a missing AgentMail skill path; a focused reproduction confirmed 5 failures / 95 passes. That is not a passing full-suite result. The unchanged focused suites, build and typecheck were repeated after rebase; the full local suite was not repeated. All 54 refreshed GitHub checks/contexts passed on `bd62bff63f9d7980bfd10e54cb0102693d27ecfb`; fresh Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved threads. - No UI component styling, database or API contract changed. - Maintainer approved the remaining rollout and cleanup. Staging snippet retirement and sleep/wake verification are complete. Production migration and removal of the legacy settings are complete for serving tenant instances. Remaining old warm inventory is excluded from new signups until configuration reconciliation completes. The maintainer authorized upgrading the remaining old deployments and clearing their pins. ## Risks - Removing the settings disables integrations that still depend on them; operators outside the completed maintainer rollout must migrate before upgrading. This is an intentional behavior change, documented at the existing setup-doc path. - Keep a previous image and its configuration for rollback. Existing browser tabs need a refresh to unload already-injected code. - Plugin UI remains trusted same-origin code. This does not add a security sandbox or change ordinary branding. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex; exact deployment variant and context-window size are not exposed in this session). Reasoning, repository inspection, local code execution and GitHub tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused rendering tests; unrelated local full-suite failures are disclosed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All refreshed checks pass on `bd62bff63f9d7980bfd10e54cb0102693d27ecfb` - [x] Fresh Greptile is 5/5 on the current head, with no unresolved findings - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>