mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-10 12:37:55 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The pull request workflow protects changes with a Playwright e2e lane. > - That lane already uses a weighted file partition so slow specs do not cluster by test count. > - Recent green PR runs showed the two e2e shard jobs were slower than the next slow required lane. > - The largest spec is indivisible, so a third shard lets that spec run alone and lets the rest split by duration. > - This pull request changes only the PR e2e shard matrix and the guard test. > - The benefit is a shorter expected PR critical path while the required `e2e` aggregate check name stays stable. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #9923 **What existing behavior does this improve?** The `pull_request` workflow Playwright e2e lane. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: GitHub Actions CI and test scripts. **Current behavior** The PR workflow runs the weighted Playwright e2e partition across two jobs. Recent green runs showed those jobs as the slowest required checks. **Proposed behavior** The PR workflow runs the same e2e spec set across three weighted jobs. The aggregate required check stays named `e2e`. **Reason and benefit** The third shard lets the slow smoke-lab spec run alone while the rest of the catalog stays balanced. This should shorten the PR critical path. The win is bounded by fixed per-job setup time. **Breaking changes** None. The required aggregate check contract is preserved. ## What Changed - Change the PR e2e shard matrix from two entries to three entries. - Update the shard guard test to expect three shards. - Floor the balance bound at the largest single spec weight. - Assert that the workflow does not define more shard indexes than `SHARD_COUNT`. ## Verification - `node --test ./scripts/__tests__/e2e-shard.test.mjs` passes with 6 tests. - The recorded-weight partition is complete and non-overlapping: 168.0s, 116.5s, and 114.4s. - I checked `ROADMAP.md` and found no overlapping roadmap-level core feature. - I searched public GitHub PRs and issues for related e2e shard work. I found related PR #9923 and no open duplicate for this branch or change. ## Risks - This adds one extra GitHub Actions runner to the PR e2e lane. - The wall-clock win is bounded by fixed per-job setup. - Behavior risk is low because the aggregate required check remains named `e2e`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool-enabled coding agent in this repository. The runtime did not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Cody <noreply@paperclip.ing>
145 lines
6.5 KiB
JavaScript
145 lines
6.5 KiB
JavaScript
import assert from "node:assert/strict";
|
|
import { spawnSync } from "node:child_process";
|
|
import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
|
|
import path from "node:path";
|
|
import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
|
|
import test from "node:test";
|
|
|
|
import { loadShardDurations } from "../general-server-shard.mjs";
|
|
import { IGNORED_SPECS, listE2eSpecs, selectE2eShard } from "../e2e-shard.mjs";
|
|
|
|
const repoRoot = path.resolve(path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)), "..", "..");
|
|
const script = path.join(repoRoot, "scripts", "e2e-shard.mjs");
|
|
const durationsManifest = path.join(repoRoot, "scripts", "e2e-shard-durations.json");
|
|
const playwrightConfig = path.join(repoRoot, "tests", "e2e", "playwright.config.ts");
|
|
const prWorkflow = path.join(repoRoot, ".github", "workflows", "pr.yml");
|
|
|
|
const SHARD_COUNT = 3;
|
|
|
|
function runShard(args) {
|
|
const result = spawnSync(process.execPath, [script, ...args], { cwd: repoRoot, encoding: "utf8" });
|
|
assert.equal(result.status, 0, `expected success for ${args.join(" ")}: ${result.stderr}`);
|
|
return result.stdout.trim().split(/\s+/).filter(Boolean);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test("the e2e shards form a complete, non-overlapping partition", () => {
|
|
const specs = listE2eSpecs();
|
|
assert.ok(specs.length > 0, "expected a non-empty e2e spec set");
|
|
|
|
const shards = Array.from({ length: SHARD_COUNT }, (_, index) =>
|
|
runShard(["--shard-index", String(index), "--shard-count", String(SHARD_COUNT)]),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const combined = shards.flat();
|
|
assert.equal(combined.length, specs.length, "every spec must land on exactly one shard");
|
|
assert.deepEqual([...combined].sort(), [...specs].sort());
|
|
for (const shard of shards) {
|
|
assert.ok(shard.length > 0, "no shard may be empty — Playwright fails a run with no matching specs");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("the ignored spec list matches playwright.config.ts testIgnore", () => {
|
|
const config = readFileSync(playwrightConfig, "utf8");
|
|
const match = config.match(/testIgnore:\s*\[([^\]]*)\]/);
|
|
assert.ok(match, "expected a testIgnore array in playwright.config.ts");
|
|
const configured = [...match[1].matchAll(/"([^"]+)"/g)].map((entry) => entry[1]);
|
|
assert.deepEqual([...configured].sort(), [...IGNORED_SPECS].sort());
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("the duration manifest only names specs that still exist", () => {
|
|
const durations = loadShardDurations(durationsManifest);
|
|
assert.ok(Object.keys(durations).length > 0, "expected a populated duration manifest");
|
|
const specs = new Set(listE2eSpecs());
|
|
for (const file of Object.keys(durations)) {
|
|
assert.ok(specs.has(file), `duration manifest names a spec that no longer runs: ${file}`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("the weighted partition keeps the shards close to balanced", () => {
|
|
const durations = loadShardDurations(durationsManifest);
|
|
const specs = listE2eSpecs();
|
|
const weights = Array.from({ length: SHARD_COUNT }, (_, index) =>
|
|
selectE2eShard(specs, index, SHARD_COUNT, durations).reduce((sum, file) => sum + (durations[file] ?? 0), 0),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const heaviest = Math.max(...weights);
|
|
const total = weights.reduce((sum, weight) => sum + weight, 0);
|
|
// Round-robin/count-based sharding would strand the ~168s smoke-lab spec on
|
|
// one runner alongside other specs. Assert the weighted split stays within
|
|
// 15% of an even cut so a future spec-time regression surfaces here instead
|
|
// of on the PR critical path. A single indivisible spec (smoke-lab) can
|
|
// legitimately exceed the even cut on its own, so the bound is floored at
|
|
// the largest per-spec weight — the best any file-level partition can do.
|
|
const largestSpec = Math.max(...specs.map((file) => durations[file] ?? 0));
|
|
const bound = Math.max((total / SHARD_COUNT) * 1.15, largestSpec);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
heaviest <= bound,
|
|
`heaviest shard ${heaviest}ms exceeds the balance bound (${bound}ms)`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("shard arguments are validated", () => {
|
|
for (const args of [
|
|
["--shard-index", "2", "--shard-count", "2"],
|
|
["--shard-index", "-1", "--shard-count", "2"],
|
|
["--shard-index", "0", "--shard-count", "0"],
|
|
]) {
|
|
const result = spawnSync(process.execPath, [script, ...args], { cwd: repoRoot, encoding: "utf8" });
|
|
assert.notEqual(result.status, 0, `expected failure for ${args.join(" ")}`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test("pr.yml keeps a stable aggregate check named e2e over the shard matrix", () => {
|
|
// Branch protection requires a check literally named `e2e`. The shards run
|
|
// as `e2e shard (n/3)`, so the aggregate job below is what keeps the
|
|
// required-check contract intact — same pattern as the `verify` aggregate.
|
|
const workflow = readFileSync(prWorkflow, "utf8");
|
|
const jobs = new Map();
|
|
let current = null;
|
|
for (const line of workflow.split("\n")) {
|
|
const header = /^ {2}([A-Za-z0-9_-]+):\s*$/.exec(line);
|
|
if (header) {
|
|
current = header[1];
|
|
jobs.set(current, []);
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
if (current && /^\S/.test(line)) current = null;
|
|
if (current) jobs.get(current).push(line);
|
|
}
|
|
for (const [id, lines] of jobs) jobs.set(id, lines.join("\n"));
|
|
|
|
const aggregate = jobs.get("e2e");
|
|
assert.ok(aggregate, "pr.yml must define an `e2e` job to satisfy branch protection");
|
|
assert.match(aggregate, /^ {4}name: e2e$/m, "the aggregate job must be named exactly `e2e`");
|
|
assert.match(aggregate, /^ {4}if: \$\{\{ always\(\) \}\}$/m, "the aggregate must run even when a shard fails");
|
|
assert.match(aggregate, /^ {4}needs: \[e2e_shards\]$/m, "the aggregate must depend on the shard matrix");
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
aggregate,
|
|
/test "\$E2E_SHARDS_RESULT" = "success"/,
|
|
"the aggregate must fail unless every shard succeeded",
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const shards = jobs.get("e2e_shards");
|
|
assert.ok(shards, "pr.yml must define the `e2e_shards` matrix job");
|
|
const matrixEntries = [
|
|
...shards.matchAll(
|
|
/^ {10}- shard_index: (?<shardIndex>\d+)\n {12}shard_count: (?<shardCount>\d+)\n {12}shard_label: (?<shardLabel>\d+\/\d+)$/gm,
|
|
),
|
|
].map((match) => ({
|
|
shardIndex: Number(match.groups.shardIndex),
|
|
shardCount: Number(match.groups.shardCount),
|
|
shardLabel: match.groups.shardLabel,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(matrixEntries.length, SHARD_COUNT, "the shard matrix must define exactly SHARD_COUNT entries");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
matrixEntries.map((entry) => entry.shardIndex).sort((a, b) => a - b),
|
|
Array.from({ length: SHARD_COUNT }, (_, index) => index),
|
|
"the shard matrix must define each shard index exactly once",
|
|
);
|
|
for (const entry of matrixEntries) {
|
|
assert.equal(entry.shardCount, SHARD_COUNT, "each shard matrix entry must use the same SHARD_COUNT");
|
|
assert.equal(entry.shardLabel, `${entry.shardIndex + 1}/${SHARD_COUNT}`, "each shard label must match its index");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|