mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-08 11:13:44 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - App connections must work in both the operator UI and agent tool gateway. > - The first stack layer adds secure remote connections. > - Operators still need clear setup, test, and recovery states. > - This pull request adds the gateway behavior and the workspace connection experience. > - The benefit is a connection flow that is easier to understand and recover. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11965 This is stack 2 of 11. It depends on stack 1 and replaces another reviewable part of #11965. ## What Changed - Improve remote tool gateway connection behavior. - Add clearer app setup, test, and recovery states. - Add focused server and UI tests for the new paths. - Keep the diff isolated from later identity and catalog work. - Stabilize DNS-pinned remote HTTP protocol fixtures and the managed-runtime public-origin fixture for this independently tested layer. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts` (150 passed) - `pnpm test:run` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm build` ## Risks - Gateway errors now surface through new user-facing states. - A stale connection can require a new setup attempt. - The change does not add a database migration. - The injected HTTP transport and public URL are test-only fixtures; production DNS pinning and runtime behavior are unchanged. > I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This stack continues the existing app connection work from #11965 and does not duplicate another planned item. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime model ID and context window were not exposed. The model used reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
35 lines
923 B
TypeScript
35 lines
923 B
TypeScript
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
const mockApi = vi.hoisted(() => ({
|
|
get: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("./client", () => ({
|
|
api: mockApi,
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
import { toolsApi } from "./tools";
|
|
|
|
describe("toolsApi.listActivity", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
mockApi.get.mockReset();
|
|
mockApi.get.mockResolvedValue({ events: [], nextCursor: null });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("uses the omitted-window contract for all-time activity", async () => {
|
|
await toolsApi.listActivity("company-1", { window: "all", limit: 50 });
|
|
|
|
expect(mockApi.get).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
"/tool-gateway/audit?companyId=company-1&limit=50",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("sends bounded activity windows explicitly", async () => {
|
|
await toolsApi.listActivity("company-1", { window: "30d", limit: 50 });
|
|
|
|
expect(mockApi.get).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
|
"/tool-gateway/audit?companyId=company-1&window=30d&limit=50",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|