Files
PaperClipAI/maps
6dda8cc2b7 fix: preserve Stop authority and qualify complete recovery journeys (#17105)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage agents that do useful work.
> - Users need complete tasks, clear questions, retained context, and
dependable recovery.
> - Separate run tests do not prove that the complete user experience
works.
> - Successful retries can hide earlier failures and missing evidence.
> - This PR extends the existing Product E2E harness with three explicit
journeys.
> - It adds a qualification checkpoint over the full retained result
pool.
> - Independent artifacts, state, rendered conversations, and delivery
receipts establish each outcome.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #17088, #17089, and #17046. This PR repairs two Stop lifecycle
defects and combines the qualification changes previously reviewed in
#17095, #17090, and #17099. Daily operations remain with #17051. It adds
no second scheduler or recovery engine.

**What happened?**

A completed run can still leave a user without useful output, an
understandable question, or a working continuation. Existing isolated
tests and best-attempt reports do not establish the combined behavior.

**Expected behavior**

A necessary question includes its explanation and resumes once after an
answer. Stop prevents automatic continuation until the user resumes.
Restart during finalization preserves the accepted provider result and
delivers it once. Qualification requires independent evidence for six
journeys on both agents through Slack and Paperclip.

**Steps to reproduce**

List the necessary-question, followup-stop-resume, and
finalization-recovery suites using the documented selectors. Run one
exact cell with the configured model and target. Supply a private
qualification manifest to the existing report command to grade all
retained attempts. Missing proof and incomplete coverage must fail.

## What Changed

- Wake existing accounting in the same committed native Stop closure. A
receipt that arrives before closure must still settle once; incomplete
receipts remain held.
- Require a later user message before native Stop can promote earlier
saved input. Preserve those earlier messages for the authorized
resumption.
- Add explicit necessary-question cells. Verify the actual prompt and
context, answer, one bound continuation, and the delivered document link
and revision.
- Add explicit follow-up, Stop, and later resumption cells. Verify a
live owned provider turn, cancellation acknowledgement, at least five
seconds without an automatic path, retained direction and workspace
context, and an actual browser download.
- Add explicit Daytona finalization-recovery cells. Stop the owned
controller after public result acceptance and during workspace
finalization. Require the original result, restored file hash, resumed
operation, one provider turn, and one receipt-bound delivery.
- Share the receipt-based delivery observer across both recovery
journeys. Keep model prose separate from the authoritative delivered
comment identity.
- Add a 24-cell qualification checkpoint over every retained attempt.
Require three fresh candidate passes per cell and later staging proof
with exact source, runtime, model, settings, instructions, and
independent evidence.
- Reject absent or unsafe manifest evidence. Preserve failed attempts
and incomplete observations in the normal reports.
- Provide four explicit rotating daily selections. Refuse daily
selection until all required live drivers exist. Keep scheduling and
spending with the existing operations owner.
- Document the exact selectors, evidence contract, limitations, and
remaining staging work.

## Verification

- Local Product E2E support: 3,554 passed with two existing skips;
source prerequisites: 128 passed. E2E typecheck passes. The actual
file-chip and Download-control browser regression passes.
- Two real-database regressions fail before the production repair. The
stopped coordinator leaves accounting asleep after a complete receipt;
the saved queue can restart from pre-Stop input. The repaired settlement
and cancellation cohort passes 66 checks. The complete 256-case
continuation suite passes with stronger two-phase Stop expectations, and
66 native executor accounting/Stop safety cases pass. Server typecheck
passes.
- All required CI, repository build/typecheck/tests, and fresh Greptile
5/5 pass at the final head 232d3c52d0,
with no unresolved findings.
- Both actual-model necessary-question development cells passed on the
earlier recorded c4e409d819 source. This is supporting evidence for that
revision, not current qualification.
- Both fresh Stop development cells at 6036cee2f4 stopped, remained
idle, resumed once, reached Done, and settled original and successor
accounting. Their original machine grades remain failed: the observer
counted the generated file-preparation carrier as another final reply.
The corrected observer independently correlates the applied preparation
receipt with the actual attachment/comment binding. Retained-wire
diagnostic replay finds one final delivery for each model without
changing either grade. Those original failures remain retained:
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39644220458.
- Both fresh actual-model Stop/resume cells pass all five checks at
232d3c52d0:
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39647010372.
Independent inspection confirms exactly one cancelled original and one
committed successor on the same task, 5.091/5.513-second quiet intervals
before the user resumes, retained workspace/instructions/tool
identities, and one receipt-bound final response. Each visible JSON chip
opens in a tab and its Download control yields verified bytes. The
rendered reference and changed label independently reconstruct the
registered file hash and the original context hash. Both cleanups pass.
These remain local API-key/per-turn development results, not the
required staging/Slack qualification.
- Other retained Stop failures include missed active boundaries, the
real accounting admission failure, and a preparation observer that
required nativeIssueId before runtime selection. They remain recorded at
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39636796645 and
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39642060165. The
preparation observer now validates all present task IDs and still
requires selected native execution at the active checkpoint.
- The remote finalization attempt failed during image export with no
disk space before a provider started. Remote crash acceptance remains
unverified.
- Negative calibration rejects wrong or absent ownership/evidence, stale
settings, unsafe files, repeated admissions, unacknowledged Stop,
premature resumption, incomplete receipts, lost context, genuine
duplicate final replies, and missing delivery. A prepared-looking body
cannot suppress a comment; absent, rejected, foreign, or mismatched file
receipts and attachment bindings also cannot suppress it.
- Core staging/Slack drivers, 72 fresh candidate passes, deployed
staging proof, and recovery of the original user-visible task remain
incomplete. No measured reliability percentage or completed
qualification is claimed.

## Risks

These are explicit development cells. Their API-key and per-turn runs do
not qualify deployed subscription authentication, warm reuse, or Slack.
A fast provider can miss the Stop boundary; that attempt fails. The
remote crash boundary depends on independently observed public state and
an owned controller. The checkpoint is opt-in through a private manifest
and cannot replace the missing live observers. The two production
changes affect native Stop settlement and saved-input promotion. They
use the existing transaction signals and admission path. A complete
receipt can settle without another provider turn. Partial accounting and
all ownership, cleanup, pause, and budget gates remain authoritative.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository tools and code execution.
The runtime does not expose its exact deployment ID or context-window
size. Those values are not inferred.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <paperclip@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-21 13:02:27 -05:00
..

Paperclip maps

The maps describe the same capabilities from two perspectives:

  • Feature map: what a person can do, where to reach it, and how to verify the user journey. Preserve its Poteto format.
  • Agent access map: the APIs and agent entry points for those capabilities, their permission boundaries, and access verification.

These are sibling directories under maps/. Each feature file has a same-named agent access companion. Reuse the product map's sub-feature IDs, so tasks/create identifies the same capability in both maps. Product behavior remains governed by the implementation spec; a map cannot grant authority or redefine a permission denial as success.

Capability identifiers

The feature ID is the recipe filename without .md, such as onboarding. The full capability ID joins that feature ID and a Sub-features key with /: the company key in feature-map/onboarding.md is onboarding/company. Its agent-access-map/onboarding.md companion uses the same local company key. The feature-map index lists the existing feature and full capability IDs.

Each child page states Feature ID: `onboarding`. after its introduction or product-map link. In feature recipes, show the full ID beside the parsed local key: - `company`: `onboarding/company` — create a company. In access companions and Storybook verification guidance, keep the existing local heading and put Capability ID: `onboarding/company`. beneath it. These labels make the existing identifiers visible without changing keys, anchors, or ID generation.

Use full capability IDs in cross-feature references, Storybook annotations, tests, issues, PRs, and verification evidence. Both segments use lowercase letters, digits, and hyphens. Keep filenames and keys stable when display titles or navigation labels change; renaming either changes the capability ID.

Entry-point IDs describe a surface, such as web-wizard, and are scoped to their recipe. Reference them with a recipe link, such as onboarding.md#web-wizard, and record the capability exercised separately. Navigation section labels are not capability IDs. See IDs and references for examples.

Access contract

Every business operation needs both an API and a usable agent entry point for an actor authorized to perform it. A dedicated tool is optional when REST, the CLI, an assigned MCP client, or native search_api / call_api already provides the operation. Record which agent surfaces actually have that path; an installed CLI or optional MCP package cannot be assumed available to every native/remote run.

Track these independently:

Dimension Values and meaning
API present, missing, not-applicable, or unreviewed. Use exact methods/paths; distinguish protocols from REST.
Agent access available, partial, missing, restricted, operator-only, not-applicable, or unreviewed. Name the supported surface and actual entry point.
Policy Actor, action/grant, company/resource/ownership scope, responsible-user intersection, run requirements, work modes, and gates relevant to the operation.
Evidence source-only, verified, failed, blocked, or not-run. Source presence and successful board calls are not agent verification.
Review depth baseline records representative operations and known gaps; operation-reviewed enumerates the capability's meaningful operations and their individual access contracts.

Broad capabilities such as task properties must be split into operations before they count as operation-reviewed: renaming, metadata edits, assignment, dependencies, and lifecycle changes can use different tools and permission rules. An available read path cannot certify a write path. List/get/create/update/delete, execution/control, credential handling, and resolution are separate where their authority or transport differs. Do not duplicate request schemas from OpenAPI.

Exceptions and restrictions

Presentation-only state, static developer fixtures, and pre-start/local operator work may use not-applicable for a domain API, with a concrete reason and the existing local path. When a capability combines shared data with presentation, split the operations: browser recents do not exempt resource lookup from API coverage. Promoting local state to a shared feature requires revisiting the entry.

A board-only endpoint is restricted for agent identity, not an automatic exception or a missing API. Cite the enforced policy and record whether the agent can request the authorized human's action and observe its result. An unresolved delegation question remains in Gaps. Company access, a job title, a personal assistant's OAuth grant, or an accepted interaction does not grant board identity. Keep budget, approval, secret and execution authority intact.

Check actual route/service authorization and production tool admission. OpenAPI actor labels and scenario/evaluation tool declarations are supporting metadata; record disagreements rather than using them as proof of access. Native API fallback restrictions, tool field/scope limits, and rollout settings are part of the agent path, even when a legacy agent can call the REST endpoint directly.

Companion file format

Each agent-access-map/<area>.md has an H1, a relative link to its product file, and its feature ID, followed by one H2 backticked local key per product sub-feature. Each capability starts with its full capability ID and contains these fields:

  • Review: baseline or operation-reviewed.
  • API: presence state and exact operation IDs, or a reasoned exception.
  • Agent access: availability state and concrete entry points by surface.
  • Policy: relevant permission and runtime boundaries, with source references.
  • Evidence: evidence state, reviewed commit and sources or executed proof.
  • Verification: allowed/denied assertions and observable result; record what has actually run separately from the proposed recipe.
  • Gaps: missing APIs/paths, discovery drift, unreviewed operations or policy decisions; use none only for the enumerated scope that was reviewed.

For an operation-reviewed capability, use H3 backticked operation IDs and repeat API, Agent access, Policy, Evidence, Verification and Gaps for each operation. Use small operation names such as create, update, read, or run-now. The enclosing capability has Review: operation-reviewed only after its meaningful operations have been enumerated. The following excerpt shows one operation; include the others before using that review label:

## `definition`

Review: `operation-reviewed`.

### `create`

API: `present` — POST /api/companies/{companyId}/routines.
Agent access: `available` — agent REST, CLI routine create and native call_api
under the enabled rollout and active-run/mode gates.
Policy: same company; assigneeAgentId must be the calling agent; cite the
routine authorization and native API policy sources.
Evidence: `source-only` — reviewed commit and source links; no live proof.
Verification: `not-run` — create an owned routine; reject assignment to another
agent; inspect saved configuration, attribution and retry behavior.
Gaps: verify ownership and responsible-user resolution with a permitted agent
context; source presence alone does not qualify this operation.

Keeping the maps synchronized

When a change adds/removes a capability or changes its behavior, API, permission, tool binding, CLI support, or work mode, update the affected companion and product recipe as appropriate in the same change. Preserve IDs across renames where the capability is unchanged; update the affected cross-links together. Indexes discover recipes automatically. An API-only change may update the companion without rewriting unchanged user instructions.

maintain-verification-skill owns reconciliation of both maps. It follows changed source and authorization, checks real agent reachability, and records product gaps without implementing them during a maintenance pass. The creation skill uses this structure. verify-paperclip consumes the relevant recipes and reports evidence/drift; map editing belongs to maintenance.

Run the structural check after map changes:

node scripts/check-maps.mjs

It checks paired areas/IDs, navigation metadata, required fields, and local references. It does not certify endpoint authorization, production bindings, operation completeness, or live behavior. Source audits must check those against the existing API and tool contracts; avoid a second schema catalog or runtime.

For live access proof, use Paperclip's existing API/runner/MCP fixtures or an owned isolated instance. Use the actual agent identity, target and work mode. Assert the allowed result and relevant denial (another company/private resource, wrong owner, missing grant, invalid run, restricted mode or resolver). Mutations also need persisted state/attribution and retry behavior. Capture evidence using the existing artifact workflow; keep executed run results separate from generated maps/generated/coverage.json, which lists page references.

Local authorship and generated indexes

Change only the recipes, access contracts and stories whose behavior or intent changed. Feature recipes own navigation metadata; stories own small parameters.paperclip annotations. Keep the feature-map README's readable ID index aligned with those sources; it does not register entries for generation. Do not refresh counts in shared READMEs, inventories, fingerprints or review journals.

node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs validates and generates aggregate navigation, Storybook data, verification routes and the page inventory. All outputs live in ignored maps/generated/, ui/storybook/generated/, and the ignored Storybook preview.tsx wrapper. Start/build and UI typechecking generate their own inputs. A clean merged checkout therefore assembles both branches' changes automatically.

Git provides history and diffs. PRs, issues and CI artifacts retain review/run evidence for the named revision. Capability associations do not create whole-file review dependencies. Keep durable scenario limits in the affected recipe or story.