Files
PaperClipAI/cli/src/__tests__/project-goal.test.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip 9c8adee48b feat(mcp) [split 5/8]: integrate adapters and deployment runtime (#9560)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters,
UI surfaces, and operator verification
> - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated
or human review
> - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs
stay below the 100-file review limit
> - This pull request is split 5/8 and focuses on remaining adapters,
CLI, plugin examples, and deployment packaging
> - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while
preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

- Related parity reference: #9534
- Problem: The backend runtime needs packaging, CLI propagation,
worktree provisioning, release manifests, and remaining adapter/plugin
consumers.
- Proposed solution: Adds the remaining runtime/deployment integration
after compile-required contracts and concrete MCP injection moved into
lower server levels.
- Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or
rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor
of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves.
- Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access
work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate
roadmap initiative.
- Stack position: base branch is
`pap10341-split/04-server-runtime-wiring`.
- Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete
eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate
remains empty.
- Requested review: QA for CLI, packaging, and worktree behavior;
Greptile on every PR.

## What Changed

- Adds the remaining runtime/deployment integration after
compile-required contracts and concrete MCP injection moved into lower
server levels.
- Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable.
- Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven
stack levels.

## Verification

- `pnpm typecheck`
- Focused CLI Vitest run — 4 files, 49 tests passed

## Risks

- Packaging omissions could make the feature work in source but fail in
Docker, worktrees, or release assembly.
- Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers;
mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy.
- Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from
#9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context
window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and
code-execution tools enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link
explicitly required for this coordinated split stack
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge


## Stack Coordination

- Internal execution plan:
[PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan)
- Parity reference: #9534
- Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563
- Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff
at #9563.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-07-14 15:15:43 -05:00

162 lines
6.2 KiB
TypeScript

import fs from "node:fs";
import os from "node:os";
import path from "node:path";
import { Command } from "commander";
import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
import { registerGoalCommands } from "../commands/client/goal.js";
import { registerProjectCommands } from "../commands/client/project.js";
const COMPANY_ID = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
const PROJECT_ID = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const GOAL_ID = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
function createProgram(): Command {
const program = new Command();
program.exitOverride();
program.configureOutput({
writeOut: () => {},
writeErr: () => {},
});
registerProjectCommands(program);
registerGoalCommands(program);
return program;
}
describe("project and goal commands", () => {
beforeEach(() => {
vi.restoreAllMocks();
delete process.env.PAPERCLIP_API_KEY;
delete process.env.PAPERCLIP_API_URL;
delete process.env.PAPERCLIP_COMPANY_ID;
process.env.PAPERCLIP_CONTEXT = path.join(fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), "paperclip-project-goal-")), "context.json");
});
afterEach(() => {
vi.restoreAllMocks();
delete process.env.PAPERCLIP_CONTEXT;
});
it("creates and updates projects with shared schemas", async () => {
const fetchMock = vi
.fn()
.mockResolvedValueOnce(new Response(JSON.stringify({
id: PROJECT_ID,
companyId: COMPANY_ID,
name: "Launch Site",
status: "planned",
goalIds: [GOAL_ID],
}), { status: 201 }))
.mockResolvedValueOnce(new Response(JSON.stringify({
id: PROJECT_ID,
companyId: COMPANY_ID,
name: "Launch Site",
status: "in_progress",
goalIds: [GOAL_ID],
}), { status: 200 }));
vi.stubGlobal("fetch", fetchMock);
vi.spyOn(console, "log").mockImplementation(() => {});
await createProgram().parseAsync([
"project", "create",
"--api-base", "http://localhost:3100",
"--api-key", "board-token",
"--company-id", COMPANY_ID,
"--name", "Launch Site",
"--status", "planned",
"--goal-ids", GOAL_ID,
], { from: "user" });
await createProgram().parseAsync([
"project", "update", PROJECT_ID,
"--api-base", "http://localhost:3100",
"--api-key", "board-token",
"--status", "in_progress",
], { from: "user" });
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[0]?.[0]).toBe(`http://localhost:3100/api/companies/${COMPANY_ID}/projects`);
expect(JSON.parse(String(fetchMock.mock.calls[0]?.[1]?.body))).toMatchObject({
name: "Launch Site",
status: "planned",
goalIds: [GOAL_ID],
});
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[1]?.[0]).toBe(`http://localhost:3100/api/projects/${PROJECT_ID}`);
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[1]?.[1]?.method).toBe("PATCH");
});
it("lists and deletes projects", async () => {
const fetchMock = vi
.fn()
.mockResolvedValueOnce(new Response(JSON.stringify([{ id: PROJECT_ID, companyId: COMPANY_ID, name: "Launch Site", status: "planned", goalIds: [] }]), { status: 200 }))
.mockResolvedValueOnce(new Response(JSON.stringify({ id: PROJECT_ID, companyId: COMPANY_ID, name: "Launch Site" }), { status: 200 }));
vi.stubGlobal("fetch", fetchMock);
vi.spyOn(console, "log").mockImplementation(() => {});
await createProgram().parseAsync([
"project", "list",
"--api-base", "http://localhost:3100",
"--api-key", "board-token",
"--company-id", COMPANY_ID,
], { from: "user" });
await createProgram().parseAsync([
"project", "delete", PROJECT_ID,
"--api-base", "http://localhost:3100",
"--api-key", "board-token",
"--yes",
], { from: "user" });
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[0]?.[0]).toBe(`http://localhost:3100/api/companies/${COMPANY_ID}/projects`);
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[1]?.[0]).toBe(`http://localhost:3100/api/projects/${PROJECT_ID}`);
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[1]?.[1]?.method).toBe("DELETE");
});
it("creates, updates, lists, and deletes goals", async () => {
const fetchMock = vi
.fn()
.mockResolvedValueOnce(new Response(JSON.stringify({ id: GOAL_ID, companyId: COMPANY_ID, title: "Grow", level: "company", status: "active" }), { status: 201 }))
.mockResolvedValueOnce(new Response(JSON.stringify({ id: GOAL_ID, companyId: COMPANY_ID, title: "Grow faster", level: "company", status: "active" }), { status: 200 }))
.mockResolvedValueOnce(new Response(JSON.stringify([{ id: GOAL_ID, companyId: COMPANY_ID, title: "Grow faster", level: "company", status: "active" }]), { status: 200 }))
.mockResolvedValueOnce(new Response(JSON.stringify({ id: GOAL_ID, companyId: COMPANY_ID, title: "Grow faster" }), { status: 200 }));
vi.stubGlobal("fetch", fetchMock);
vi.spyOn(console, "log").mockImplementation(() => {});
await createProgram().parseAsync([
"goal", "create",
"--api-base", "http://localhost:3100",
"--api-key", "board-token",
"--company-id", COMPANY_ID,
"--title", "Grow",
"--level", "company",
"--status", "active",
], { from: "user" });
await createProgram().parseAsync([
"goal", "update", GOAL_ID,
"--api-base", "http://localhost:3100",
"--api-key", "board-token",
"--title", "Grow faster",
], { from: "user" });
await createProgram().parseAsync([
"goal", "list",
"--api-base", "http://localhost:3100",
"--api-key", "board-token",
"--company-id", COMPANY_ID,
], { from: "user" });
await createProgram().parseAsync([
"goal", "delete", GOAL_ID,
"--api-base", "http://localhost:3100",
"--api-key", "board-token",
"--yes",
], { from: "user" });
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[0]?.[0]).toBe(`http://localhost:3100/api/companies/${COMPANY_ID}/goals`);
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[1]?.[0]).toBe(`http://localhost:3100/api/goals/${GOAL_ID}`);
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[1]?.[1]?.method).toBe("PATCH");
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[2]?.[0]).toBe(`http://localhost:3100/api/companies/${COMPANY_ID}/goals`);
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[3]?.[0]).toBe(`http://localhost:3100/api/goals/${GOAL_ID}`);
expect(fetchMock.mock.calls[3]?.[1]?.method).toBe("DELETE");
});
});