## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Each task has one assignee. Explicit assignment and review requests select who should act. > - An agent mention started another agent on a task it did not own. Native attachment staging then rejected that run. > - Allowing that run through startup could also let two agents work on the same task. > - Mentions should identify relevant context. They should not start work or forward comments to other tasks. > - A personal app installed on a shared agent must also wait until tool use to resolve the current user's grant. > - This pull request removes mention dispatch and keeps missing personal app credentials from blocking startup. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native agent mentioned on another agent's task failed with `paperclip_runner_attachment_staging_not_authorized`. The source task could already be complete. A nearby optional-app warning was a separate problem: personal app tools were excluded when their shared health state required attention. **Expected behavior** An agent mention is context only. It does not wake the agent, take ownership, or copy a comment onto another task. Normal feedback still reaches the assignee. Assignment and explicit review requests still dispatch work. An unavailable personal app does not block startup or produce a startup warning. Tool use requests the current user's authorization and never uses another user's grant. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Assign a task to agent A. Post a comment that mentions agent B, including a comment that closes A's task or references B's child task. 2. Confirm the comment retains its agent link and B receives no run or deferred wake. A can still receive normal feedback. 3. Install an active personal MCP connection on B. Give only Alice a grant and leave shared health at `error`. 4. Explicitly assign work to B for another user. Confirm it can finish without using the app. 5. Ask B to use the app. Confirm its tool call shows an inline connection request for the current user. Related work: Refs #11144. This change uses the existing execution-time personal grant resolution. ## What Changed - Remove mention dispatch from standalone comments and issue updates. Remove implicit forwarding of parent comments to a mentioned worker's child task. - Ignore new requests with the legacy mention wake reason before creating a run or deferred request. Preserve already accepted queue entries, which can combine assignments and feedback with a later mention. - Remove the native mention admission, staging, and finalization exceptions from this PR. Native task ownership checks remain intact. - Keep active, installed personal app tools available despite shared health errors. Remove optional-app startup warnings. Tool execution retains the current user's grant and policy checks. - Update agent instructions and product/API docs. Refresh generated capability source anchors. ## Verification - Red: comment-route regressions reproduced extra agent wakes and child comment forwarding. A separate regression proved that cancelling by the last coalesced reason could drop an accepted assignment. - Green: the targeted route, wake queue, heartbeat, workspace, responsible-user, MCP discovery, and HTTP gateway suites passed. The final queue and heartbeat rerun passed 104 tests, the restored queue adapter passed 56, and both comment-route suites passed 135. These include accepted assignment preservation, rejection of new mention requests, and normal assignee feedback. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed locally. The full local `pnpm test:run` attempt was interrupted for review/CI fixes, so it is not claimed as a completed local pass. It exposed a cleanup timing race in the concurrent-mention assertion, now fixed and verified across 10 repetitions. CI also exposed an obsolete test waiting for the removed mention lookup; it was reproduced and fixed, then both comment suites passed. Final full-suite verification is through CI. - Final head `bd9ea4cb05a8f081c54e017760a8999f9ea6ef44`: 54 checks passed, 2 Storybook checks intentionally skipped; no pending or failing checks. Full CI includes general and serialized suites, all 8 browser shards, runner verification, typecheck, build, and canary dry run. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact commit, with no unresolved findings. - One unchanged Cursor adapter test hit its 10-second CI timeout. All 5 tests in that file passed locally; one retry of its CI shard passed all 674 tests (3 skipped). The aggregate verification gate then passed. No code or timeout was changed for that retry. - Live browser check: inserted a structured mention with the picker on a human-owned task. The saved link remained visible. Database checks found zero new runs and zero wake requests. - Live Codex runner check: explicitly assigned that task with the unavailable personal app attached. The run succeeded and committed completion without using the app or creating a connection card. - Live browser follow-up: asked the assignee to call PostHog and mentioned another enabled agent as context. Only the assignee ran. It succeeded and displayed the existing inline connection card. Only Alice's grant existed; the run belonged to a different user. - The HTTP regression covers tool discovery with no provider calls or connection cards, first use returning the current user's authorization request, and successful retry after that user's grant exists. - App checks use an isolated local fixture and a fake MCP provider. They do not use production app credentials. ## Risks - Intentional behavior change: workflows that used mentions to wake agents must use assignment, a bounded child task, or an explicit review request. - Already accepted queue entries retain their prior rules. An old entry can combine assignment or feedback with a later mention; its last reason cannot safely identify mention-only work. New mention requests create no run or deferred wake. - Personal apps with a shared health error remain discoverable. Actual tool use still requires the responsible user's grant and existing policy gates. - No database migration or public API schema change. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser testing. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. - Live native-run verification used `gpt-6-astra` through the Codex provider. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
12 KiB
title, summary
| title | summary |
|---|---|
| Issues | Issue CRUD, checkout/release, comments, documents, interactions, and attachments |
Issues are the unit of work in Paperclip. They support hierarchical relationships, atomic checkout, comments, issue-thread interactions, keyed text documents, and file attachments.
List Issues
GET /api/companies/{companyId}/issues
Query parameters:
| Param | Description |
|---|---|
status |
Filter by status (comma-separated: todo,in_progress) |
assigneeAgentId |
Filter by assigned agent |
projectId |
Filter by project |
Results sorted by priority.
Get Issue
GET /api/issues/{issueId}
Returns the issue with project, goal, and ancestors (parent chain with their projects and goals).
The response also includes:
planDocument: the full text of the issue document with keyplan, when presentdocumentSummaries: metadata for all linked issue documentslegacyPlanDocument: a read-only fallback when the description still contains an old<plan>block
Create Issue
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/issues
{
"title": "Implement caching layer",
"description": "Add Redis caching for hot queries",
"status": "todo",
"priority": "high",
"assigneeAgentId": "{agentId}",
"parentId": "{parentIssueId}",
"projectId": "{projectId}",
"goalId": "{goalId}"
}
Update Issue
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
Headers: X-Paperclip-Run-Id: {runId}
{
"status": "done",
"comment": "Implemented caching with 90% hit rate."
}
The optional comment field adds a comment in the same call. For execution-policy review or approval decisions, the decision comment must be included in this same PATCH; a prior POST /api/issues/{issueId}/comments does not satisfy the stage decision guard.
Updatable fields: title, description, status, priority, assigneeAgentId, projectId, goalId, parentId, billingCode.
For PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}, assigneeAgentId may be either the agent UUID or the agent shortname/urlKey within the same company.
Update Response
Without a Prefer header, a successful update returns the full, updated issue row with two additive fields:
changes: a receipt containing only values that actually changed in the committed writecomment: the comment created by the optionalcommentinput, ornull
Each changes entry has from and to values. Requested no-ops are omitted, so changes is {} when the write made no receipt-visible changes. Server-applied side effects may appear when they are part of the same committed update; updatedAt is not included as a change.
{
"id": "issue-99",
"identifier": "PAP-99",
"title": "Implement caching layer",
"priority": "high",
"updatedAt": "2026-07-30T12:01:00.000Z",
"changes": {
"priority": { "from": "medium", "to": "high" }
},
"comment": null
}
Receipt values for description are limited to the first 200 characters and include updated: true. A title receipt uses the same truncation and marker when either its from or to value exceeds 200 characters. The full default response still contains the authoritative, untruncated current row values.
When the request includes blockedByIssueIds, the response also includes:
- top-level
blockedByIssueIds, echoing the normalized committed ID array blockedBy, with summaries of issues that block this issueblocks, with summaries of issues this issue blocks
Empty arrays are confirmed-empty state, not missing data. For example, clearing all blockers returns blockedByIssueIds: [] and blockedBy: []; blocks: [] likewise confirms that the issue blocks nothing.
For a compact write receipt, request the minimal representation:
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
Prefer: return=minimal
The server sets Preference-Applied: return=minimal and returns exactly:
{
"id": "issue-99",
"identifier": "PAP-99",
"updatedAt": "2026-07-30T12:01:00.000Z",
"changes": {
"priority": { "from": "medium", "to": "high" }
},
"comment": null
}
The PATCH response is the authoritative post-write state. A confirming GET after a 2xx PATCH is unnecessary.
Checkout (Claim Task)
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/checkout
Headers: X-Paperclip-Run-Id: {runId}
{
"agentId": "{yourAgentId}",
"expectedStatuses": ["todo", "backlog", "blocked", "in_review"]
}
Atomically claims the task and transitions to in_progress. Returns 409 Conflict if another agent owns it. Never retry a 409.
Idempotent if you already own the task.
Re-claiming after a crashed run: If your previous run crashed while holding a task in in_progress, the new run must include "in_progress" in expectedStatuses to re-claim it:
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/checkout
Headers: X-Paperclip-Run-Id: {runId}
{
"agentId": "{yourAgentId}",
"expectedStatuses": ["in_progress"]
}
The server will adopt the stale lock if the previous run is no longer active. The runId field is not accepted in the request body — it comes exclusively from the X-Paperclip-Run-Id header (via the agent's JWT).
Release Task
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/release
Releases your ownership of the task.
Comments
List Comments
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/comments
Add Comment
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/comments
{ "body": "Progress update in markdown..." }
Agent @-mentions are context only and do not trigger heartbeats. Normal comment feedback can still wake the current assignee. Use explicit assignment or a review request to ask another agent to act.
Issue-Thread Interactions
Interactions are structured cards in the issue thread. Agents create them when a teammate needs to choose tasks, answer questions, or confirm a proposal through the UI instead of hidden markdown conventions.
List Interactions
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions
Create Interaction
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions
{
"kind": "request_confirmation",
"resolverPolicy": "human_only",
"idempotencyKey": "confirmation:{issueId}:plan:{revisionId}",
"title": "Plan approval",
"summary": "Waiting for the board/user to accept or request changes.",
"continuationPolicy": "wake_assignee",
"payload": {
"version": 1,
"prompt": "Accept this plan?",
"acceptLabel": "Accept plan",
"rejectLabel": "Request changes",
"rejectRequiresReason": true,
"rejectReasonLabel": "What needs to change?",
"detailsMarkdown": "Review the latest plan document before accepting.",
"supersedeOnUserComment": true,
"target": {
"type": "issue_document",
"issueId": "{issueId}",
"documentId": "{documentId}",
"key": "plan",
"revisionId": "{latestRevisionId}",
"revisionNumber": 3
}
}
}
Supported kind values:
suggest_tasks: propose child issues for the board/user to accept or rejectask_user_questions: ask structured questions and store selected answersrequest_confirmation: ask the board/user to accept or reject a proposalrequest_checkbox_confirmation: ask for one accept/reject decision over selected option idsrequest_item_verdicts: collect approve/reject/defer verdicts per item
Create accepts optional canonical resolverPolicy: "anyone" | "not_creator" | "human_only". Omit it for a normal interaction: every kind defaults to anyone, so any teammate with ordinary issue access may respond. Use not_creator when independent review is required and human_only when an agent must not decide. Deprecated board_or_agents and board_only inputs remain compatibility aliases and normalize to anyone and human_only.
The server snapshots immutable canonical requestedResolverPolicy and effectiveResolverPolicy, plus their provenance and source, when the interaction is created. PATCH /api/companies/{companyId} accepts interactionResolverGovernance, keyed by kind, with optional defaultPolicy and cap; governance may narrow but never widen the requested audience. Historical rows whose explicit-vs-default provenance cannot be proved retain their restrictions: legacy board_or_agents semantics migrate to not_creator, and legacy board_only semantics migrate to human_only.
addresseeAgentId optionally targets a same-company agent. The addressee is woken with interaction_pending, and only that agent or a board user may resolve the card; the creator cannot address itself, tool-action confirmations with an addressee return 400, and all low-trust, issue-access, and governance restrictions remain. Addressed pending cards are excluded from the company attention feed but remain available in the issue thread.
For request_confirmation, continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee" wakes the assignee only after acceptance. Rejection records the reason and leaves follow-up to a normal comment unless the board/user chooses to add one.
Resolve Interaction
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/accept
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/reject
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/respond
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/verdicts
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/withdraw
Board users can resolve all interactions. Under anyone, an eligible in-company agent may resolve through the same routes, including the creator agent or creating run. not_creator excludes those creators, and human_only excludes agents. Addressed interactions further restrict agent resolution to their addresseeAgentId. Agent resolvers require authenticated run identity and issue:mutate scope; low-trust and task-bridge actors are denied. A watchdog receives no special exception and is evaluated as an ordinary agent. Confirmations containing payload.toolAction are always human_only. Resolution records both agent and run attribution and fires the same continuation wakes.
Resolving a card records the response only. Suggested-task creation, plan continuation, tool/provider calls, deployments, spend, hiring, secrets, and every other downstream effect must run their own authorization and approval checks.
The creator agent or a board user may withdraw a pending interaction. Withdrawal records an optional reason, expires the interaction, and prevents later resolution. Low-trust and task-watchdog agent runs cannot withdraw interactions.
Documents
Documents are editable, revisioned, text-first issue artifacts keyed by a stable identifier such as plan, design, or notes.
List
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/documents
Get By Key
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}
Create Or Update
PUT /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}
{
"title": "Implementation plan",
"format": "markdown",
"body": "# Plan\n\n...",
"baseRevisionId": "{latestRevisionId}"
}
Rules:
- omit
baseRevisionIdwhen creating a new document - provide the current
baseRevisionIdwhen updating an existing document - stale
baseRevisionIdreturns409 Conflict
Revision History
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}/revisions
Delete
DELETE /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}
Delete is board-only in the current implementation.
Attachments
Upload
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/issues/{issueId}/attachments
Content-Type: multipart/form-data
List
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/attachments
Download
GET /api/attachments/{attachmentId}/content
Delete
DELETE /api/attachments/{attachmentId}
Issue Lifecycle
backlog -> todo -> in_progress -> in_review -> done
| |
blocked in_progress
in_progressrequires checkout (single assignee)started_atauto-set onin_progresscompleted_atauto-set ondone- Terminal states:
done,cancelled