## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - The issue list and issue detail surfaces summarize child/sub-issue
progress for operators.
> - Those summaries need to be compact and visually consistent because
they appear in dense lists.
> - The progress strip is most useful when there are multiple sub-issues
to compare, so the summary intentionally stays hidden for a single
sub-issue.
> - This pull request tightens the sub-issue progress summary styling
and updates the related tests.
> - The benefit is a cleaner, more scannable task list without changing
task ownership, status, or workflow behavior.
## What Changed
- Adjusted sub-issue progress summary copy/styling in the issue list and
detail summary helpers.
- Intentionally render the progress summary only for two or more child
issues; a single child issue still appears in the normal sub-issue list
without a redundant progress strip.
- Updated the UI tests that assert the rendered summary behavior.
- Clarified the two-plus-child threshold in code with a named constant.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/ui
ui/src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/issue-detail-subissues.test.ts`
## Screenshots
## Risks
- Low risk; this is a small UI presentation change with focused test
coverage.
- The intentional threshold change means parents with exactly one child
no longer show the aggregate progress strip, avoiding redundant summary
chrome while keeping the child visible in the list.
- No schema or API behavior changes.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5`, coding model with tool use and local command
execution; context window not exposed by the runtime.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
