mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-29 12:59:13 +01:00
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Connections provide governed tools, chat channels, model accounts,
and gateways.
> - Several management routes require a human board actor even when an
agent has the required grant.
> - Default agents must configure these resources within the responsible
user's authority.
> - This pull request adds a shared authorization path to the existing
REST and native API surface.
> - Human authentication, execution approvals, and local host boundaries
remain enforced.
> - The benefit is that a standard agent can complete authorized setup
with a bounded human handoff.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**Subsystem affected**
Server authorization, connection services, shared contracts, native API
discovery, database schema.
**Problem or motivation**
Connection administration is available in the web app but often
unavailable to agents. Agent grants, responsible-user authority,
credential ownership, and actor attribution need separate checks.
Opening gateway-token creation also requires preserving the issuing
agent's delegated authority during token use.
**Proposed solution**
Use the existing authorization evaluator for every connection family.
Enforce current responsible-user authority, effective trust, grant
scope, resource visibility, and target-agent access. Keep existing agent
grants unchanged. Expose authorized configuration through default
`search_api` and `call_api`. Save human authentication steps and let
agents continue after completion.
**Roadmap alignment**
This change completes the API access path for the existing Connected
Apps, Personal & Shared AI Accounts, and governed MCP Gateway
capabilities in `ROADMAP.md`. It follows the maintainer's requested
design. Related work: #11899 enforces connection execution access and
creator/manager rules; this PR extends agent management across
connection families. It does not replace that execution-policy work.
## What Changed
- Add shared connection management context and mandatory
responsible-user, trust, scope, and target checks.
- Allow authorized agents to configure tool, chat/email, GitHub/Slack,
AI, profile, and gateway resources through existing routes.
- Preserve human credential ownership and record the actual agent,
responsible user, and run or key in audit data.
- Preserve saved browser authentication handoffs and callback session
checks.
- Bind agent-issued durable gateway tokens to their responsible user and
recheck delegated authority at use.
- Add explicit REST transport and management capability metadata,
built-in guidance, and sensitive-response handling.
- Intersect caller and endpoint-agent Slack test/invitation policies,
including independent and shared rates. Require the addressed human’s
current endpoint identity link before completing identity handoffs.
- Add production-authenticated integration scenarios. Companion #17739
contains the saved setup UI (including the required human
import/rotation step), product and permission documentation,
catalog/Vercel credential and callback ownership, and operation maps to
keep each review below 100 files. Both PRs must ship together; merge
this implementation first, then its companion.
## Verification
- Current implementation head:
`2ecd6451d0d0c8d82121a4e3fa4ce94c5befbbd6`, including master
`ea727dc3c2`, 99 files. The latest follow-up fixes the two valid
findings from the preceding f9 review. Exact-head Greptile has completed
at5/5 with no findings and Superagent passed. Full exact-head Linux CI
workflow40446606056 completed SUCCESS; only the queued external
Paperclip Review remains pending; earlier Linux passes do not qualify
this successor.
- Latest preserved-stack verification passed **2,165 tests** in fresh
PostgreSQL: **70 actual-auth scenarios**, 27 OpenAPI contracts, 2,022
native API tests and 46 saved GitHub wizard cases. **141 existing
gateway/policy acceptance tests** also passed. Workspace
typecheck/build, maps and token gates passed. The first workspace
typecheck was blocked by sandbox tsx IPC permissions; its authorized
rerun passed. This is focused local evidence; the full Linux CI matrix
is still required.
- Issuer/target gateway policy regressions were red before the fix. Both
decisions now intersect, including Block/Ask first/rates, same
credential identity and current token/user/agent authority after
approval. Invocations retain their token and actual requesting agent;
deleted tokens fail closed. Thirteen actual-auth cases cover revocation,
narrowed scope, approvals, shared rates and board compatibility.
Intermediate missing-token attribution, review-context and
implicit-session actor failures remain in the qualification record; all
final cases pass.
- Activity pagination now retains a bounded cursor across private-only
windows. The actual-JWT regression reaches three older readable events
after 27 private ones without exposing private details. A native
device-login regression was red for plaintext receipts; local check and
test-call results now use existing protected-response handling. The
passing actual-auth case proves encrypted persistence, exact replay,
redacted history and no response asset.
- Previous-head `5b55195593` Linux CI initially failed e2e shard 4/8 in
the existing connection-intent continuation test: periodic recovery
queued a repair at 01:21:47, the scripted journey completed the task at
01:21:48, and the extra queued run was cancelled at 01:21:49 because the
task was terminal. The assertion selected that latest cancelled run.
GitHub refused the first attempt while the workflow was nonterminal.
After completion, the single evidence-supported failed-job rerun was
accepted as **attempt 2** on the same head (workflow 40431202466). The
failed shard and final E2E aggregate passed on attempt 2, and the
complete Linux workflow for that head is successful. The original
failure remains part of qualification. No additional unchanged-code
rerun will be used for this failure.
- Companion CI also has an unchanged login-cleanup idleness timeout,
retained in its qualification record. That same 16-case suite passed in
this parent Linux run and a fresh local database. Both preceding
workflows passed after their single failed-job reruns as attempt 2; the
original failures remain recorded. No additional unchanged-code rerun
was used.
- Migration `0380_broken_aqueduct.sql` was regenerated through the
repository workflow after master took 0379 for project Git
authorization. It adds the responsible-user column with `IF NOT EXISTS`,
preserves upstream migrations, and satisfies snapshot retention and
migration safety checks.
- Upstream published Copilot v62 and v63 identities remain byte-for-byte
unchanged. The combined guidance is now v64, digest
`sha256:22e31f95ef972bcead98a4a707c9f33433558fd111e390e027a2bbb4346e112a`.
The normal shared TypeScript/Rust identity check and **61 Copilot
installation tests passed**. The old source-identity assertion first
failed against unchanged published v63; regenerating a new v64 preserves
the published release.
- Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`, map validation, and UI
token gates passed on the final combined stack after the upstream merge.
Node 24.22.1 / pnpm 9.15.4 were used.
- **Earlier 82 API/OpenAPI tests passed** in fresh PostgreSQL 18: 55
assembled-server scenarios and 27 contracts. They use real persistent
agent keys, run JWTs, human sessions, production defaults, and
deterministic provider fixtures. No actor injection establishes access.
- The new email regression was red before per-account scope filtering.
The Arcade regression was red before human ownership and inventory-key
fixes; it also verifies actual-agent audit identity and a human-session
inventory read. The activity regression measured **200 authorization
checks before the fix and one afterward** for the same one-item page.
- **82 GitHub UI tests passed**, including all three new
failed-replacement regressions that were red before their fix. The UI
preserves an earlier copy only after confirming its committed
generation. Changed or unreadable results block copying and reconnecting
until reconciled. Human-only secret responses now include their
nonsecret committed generation.
- Private test status now rechecks the originating principal and linked
task, including mandatory agent/responsible-user privacy. Cross-agent
tests require the full caller tool access decision and the same
credential identity, regardless of auth label; caller and target
policies/approvals and rate limits apply before execution and after
human approval. A profile-only precondition was found to reject valid
allow-policy and scoped-grant access and has been removed. Both
permitted-access cases and a no-auth-label identity regression were red
before the correction; caller-specific Block still prevents provider
execution. The private-status regression was also red before its fix.
- The tool-activity regression measured 100 capability decisions and 102
run captures on a 100-event page before the fix. It now uses two task
decisions and at most two captures while retaining the same 50 visible
events, private-event filtering, and 403 after audit-grant revocation.
The regression was red before request-context reuse and task-decision
sharing; final server typecheck/build also pass.
- Generic chat configure/reconnect now hands agent-supplied verification
credentials to the addressed human before provider work or vault
changes. Actual key/JWT regressions were red for Slack signing-key
replacement and generic channel secret-reference rebinding. They now
prove unchanged refs and vaulted signing value, human setup, permitted
agent bot-token repair, and governed test messages. All 82 API/OpenAPI
cases pass in fresh PostgreSQL. Eight native receipt protections and
final server typecheck/build also pass.
- The preceding review found that old healthy state could retire a
credential-entry card before a human changed anything. The actual-JWT
regression was red. Saved field generations now change only with
protected values and commit with refs plus a verification fence; retries
retain the baseline. Old health, bot-token repair and unchanged entry
stay pending. New signing verification and current authority permit
continuation. A separate red race proved that user revocation during
provider authentication could return 403 after refs changed; authority
is now checked before persistence and inside the credential transaction.
The final 82 API/OpenAPI cases, four neighboring real-database
Slack/GitHub lifecycle cases, and final server typecheck/build pass.
- A preceding full run crossed a rate-window boundary. Database rows
prove one consumed slot at 23:35 and another at 23:36 for the same
policy/bucket. Only Date is frozen in the rate test cases; transport and
asynchronous timers remain real. Production rate behavior is unchanged,
and the final full run passes. An intermediate fixture failure that
overwrote hidden generation metadata with an API projection is retained
in the qualification record.
- Linux CI on an earlier head found two rate-admission assertions that
omitted the newly persisted bucket key. The failures were reproduced
locally; both assertions now verify the exact actor/tool bucket and all
49 policy-service tests pass. The companion qualification record retains
the initial and intermediate failures. Catalog creator attribution is
preserved in the companion to keep this implementation review at 99
files.
- The latest review reproduced three regressions before repair: complete
human replacements failed on unavailable old signing secrets, fresh
GitHub links incorrectly selected reconnect, and different
credential-entry requests shared an idempotency key. Each old protected
ref now has a narrow known-unavailable fallback; unexpected resolver
failures and company/scope violations still abort. Fresh imports keep
their credential form, configured endpoints keep reconnect, and
canonical field sets/completion modes distinguish handoffs while
matching retries retain their baseline. All 55 actual-auth scenarios and
27 separately run OpenAPI contracts pass, as do server typecheck/build.
Companion #17739 also passes all 41 wizard tests including actual
fresh-form submission, UI typecheck, maps and token gates. Earlier red
results and a mistyped OpenAPI filename are retained in qualification.
- The configured GitHub handoff regression was red in the
browser-component tests and actual-auth link/persistence tests. Saved
links now name requested fields and all/any completion mode; the
companion form submits those supplied fields through reconnect and
retains other saved credentials. Webhook/client-secret reconnect remains
human-only; first-setup secret restrictions remain. All 46 wizard tests
pass, including combined modes and legacy links. A duplicate review
referenced the older companion bf760912; the current form is already
fixed, linked in the reply, and its thread is resolved.
- Linux CI on bf760912 failed automatic Slack provisioning because vault
persistence cleared an already verified manifest-update challenge. The
same regression was reproduced locally. The provider-owned helper now
preserves proof only for the current signing fingerprint and callback
URL. Eight existing compatibility cases pass, including this case and
initial GitHub secret rejection. The first uncommitted GitHub-field
variant also failed that initial boundary and was narrowed to reconnect;
both failures remain in qualification.
- The upstream merge conflicted only in generated migration metadata.
Upstream 0379 is preserved, normal generation/pruning produced 0380, and
two repeated applications of the idempotent additive SQL passed. The
final combined stack passed **128 tests** (55 actual-auth, 27 OpenAPI
and 46 wizard cases) in fresh PostgreSQL. Eight Google UI cases also
pass; the two protocol cases could not initialize embedded PostgreSQL in
this fresh local attempt. Their earlier passing evidence remains
historical; fresh Linux CI must execute them. Vercel personal credential
attribution is preserved in companion #17739 with its other
ownership/consent follow-ups, keeping this PR at 99 files.
- The suite covers fresh defaults, restricted users/agents, scopes,
personal isolation, token revocation, human handoffs, callback replay,
execution approvals, authorized self-targeted policy changes,
self-approval denial, and current authority before commit. Reproduce API
checks with `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/connection-management.integration.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts`, using a fresh database
through `PAPERCLIP_CONNECTION_MANAGEMENT_TEST_DATABASE_URL` or the
default embedded test database.
- Companion #17739 also records consent separately from token refresh so
saved Google choices survive refresh. Its eight service-picker and two
local-HTTP OAuth tests pass; both new UI cases were red before the fix.
Normal migration generation confirms no SQL change is needed for the
additive JSON metadata.
- The integration module shares one assembled server, authentication
factory, and provider lifecycle to preserve the
HTTP-to-vault-to-task-continuation proof. A reused external database
caused a Slack fixture identity conflict; the fresh final run passed.
Earlier fixture/transport and contract-update failures remain in the
companion qualification record.
- The broad local `pnpm test:run` attempt remains blocked by macOS
embedded PostgreSQL's host semaphore limit. It is not a clean pass. The
fresh Linux CI matrix must complete. Provider fixtures do not prove live
setup or an empirical LLM success rate.
- A current-head completed Paperclip assessment is not yet recorded. Its
earlier external recovery boundary has not been bypassed, and no
incomplete assessment is reported as passing. The user authorized both
merges when checks pass; merge this implementation first, then replay,
retarget, and requalify companion #17739 against the squash-merged
master.
- After the master refresh, local workspace typecheck/build, **97
actual-auth/OpenAPI cases** and **141 gateway/policy cases** pass. The
original fixed database port was occupied; Docker assigned a free
localhost port. The first neighbor setup command could not resolve root
`tsx`, leaving its schema uninitialized; the built database package
migrated the separate fixture and all unchanged cases passed. Both setup
failures are retained in qualification. Fresh Linux CI remains required;
no full local test-sweep pass is claimed.
- The f9 Greptile review scored **2/5** for two reproduced findings:
Slack test sends skipped the caller’s tool policy, and healthy App
credentials completed an unconfirmed identity handoff. Both are fixed in
this head and have resolved evidence threads
([Slack](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17737#discussion_r4384927765),
[identity](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17737#discussion_r4384927895)).
Actual key/JWT cases cover twelve Slack caller/target/recipient
combinations; the human-session GitHub OAuth callback alone remains
pending until explicit confirmation. All **99 API/OpenAPI tests** (72
actual-auth + 27 contracts), workspace typecheck and build pass. On the
combined companion, all four focused cases (including the twelve Slack
combinations), typecheck/build and maps also pass. The continuation
suite’s 50 embedded-PG cases were skipped because its database could not
start locally; fresh Linux CI must run them. Initial fixture
credential-collision and audit-projection assertion failures are
retained with the red reproductions in the companion qualification
record. No full local sweep or live consent is claimed.
## Risks
- The maintainer explicitly confirmed authorized policy administration,
including self-targeted changes that loosen controls. These writes
require management grants and the responsible user’s current authority.
Agents cannot approve their own governed action requests or edit their
own principal permission grants. The actual-auth regression exercises
both permitted administration and those denials.
- This is a broad authorization change. Incorrect scope or owner
resolution could deny permitted setup or expose another user's
resources. Integration cases cover both permitted and denied requests
with actual authentication.
- The additive nullable gateway-token column does not infer identities
for legacy clients or backfill agent grants. Legacy agent tokens without
a responsible user fail closed.
- Provider fixtures test supported setup and callback contracts. They do
not prove live provider availability.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, and code
execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific deployment ID or
context-window size.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — focused suites above;
full local sweep remains blocked as documented
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green — exact `2ecd6451d0` Linux CI
completed SUCCESS; external Paperclip Review is still queued
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups —
exact `2ecd6451d0` review completed; both f9 findings have resolved
evidence replies
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
3066 lines
122 KiB
TypeScript
3066 lines
122 KiB
TypeScript
import { and, eq, inArray, isNull, or, sql, type SQL } from "drizzle-orm";
|
|
import type { Db } from "@paperclipai/db";
|
|
import { withHumanDirectedWork } from "./human-directed-work.js";
|
|
import { hasOwnerChatInstructionAuthority } from "./owner-chat-instruction-authority.js";
|
|
import { canonicalExecutionUuid } from "./execution-identity.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
agents,
|
|
approvals,
|
|
issueApprovals,
|
|
authUsers,
|
|
companyMemberships,
|
|
chatConversations,
|
|
chatDeliveries,
|
|
chatIdentityLinks,
|
|
heartbeatRuns,
|
|
executionWorkspaces,
|
|
instanceUserRoles,
|
|
issueComments,
|
|
issueAccessGrants,
|
|
issues,
|
|
principalPermissionGrants,
|
|
projectAccessMembers,
|
|
projects,
|
|
userInboxAgentPolicies,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/db";
|
|
import type {
|
|
AgentApiKeyScope,
|
|
InboxAgentPolicyMode,
|
|
PermissionKey,
|
|
PrincipalType,
|
|
SkillTestAgentKeyScope,
|
|
TaskBridgeAgentKeyScope,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import {
|
|
LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
|
|
extractAgentMentionIds,
|
|
trustPresetSchema,
|
|
lowTrustBoundarySchema,
|
|
lowTrustReviewPresetPolicySchema,
|
|
type LowTrustBoundary,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import {
|
|
LOW_TRUST_ISSUE_ANCESTRY_MAX_DEPTH,
|
|
isIssueWithinLowTrustBoundary,
|
|
resolveCoreTrustPreset,
|
|
type TrustPresetResolution,
|
|
} from "./trust-preset-resolver.js";
|
|
import { logger } from "../middleware/logger.js";
|
|
import { normalizeAgentPermissions } from "../lib/agent-permissions.js";
|
|
import { grantsForHumanRole, normalizeHumanRole } from "./company-member-roles.js";
|
|
import { isRunPhaseActive, measureRunPhase, type ExecutionPhase } from "./execution-preparation-timing.js";
|
|
|
|
function measureWorkspaceAuthorization<T>(phase: Extract<ExecutionPhase, `authorization.${string}`>, work: () => T | Promise<T>): T | Promise<T> {
|
|
return isRunPhaseActive("workspace.access.task_authorization") || isRunPhaseActive("workspace.access.authorization")
|
|
? measureRunPhase(phase, work) : work();
|
|
}
|
|
import {
|
|
CONNECTION_MANAGEMENT_PERMISSIONS, isConnectionManagementAction,
|
|
type ConnectionManagementAction, type ConnectionManagementResource,
|
|
} from "./connection-management-policy.js";
|
|
|
|
export type AuthorizationActor =
|
|
{
|
|
type: "board" | "agent" | "none";
|
|
userId?: string | null;
|
|
sessionId?: string | null;
|
|
companyIds?: string[];
|
|
memberships?: Array<{ companyId: string; membershipRole?: string | null; status?: string }>;
|
|
onBehalfOfMemberships?: Array<{ companyId: string; membershipRole?: string | null; status?: string }>;
|
|
isInstanceAdmin?: boolean;
|
|
ignoreInstanceAdmin?: boolean;
|
|
agentId?: string | null;
|
|
companyId?: string | null;
|
|
keyId?: string | null;
|
|
keyScope?: AgentApiKeyScope | null;
|
|
runId?: string | null;
|
|
onBehalfOfUserId?: string | null;
|
|
/** Pinned, server-derived external authorizer; never an agent-selected principal. */
|
|
authorizingUserId?: string | null;
|
|
source?:
|
|
| "local_implicit"
|
|
| "session"
|
|
| "board_key"
|
|
| "agent_key"
|
|
| "agent_jwt"
|
|
| "mcp_oauth"
|
|
| "cloud_tenant"
|
|
| "cloud_control"
|
|
| "none";
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
export type AuthorizationAction =
|
|
| PermissionKey
|
|
| ConnectionManagementAction
|
|
| "agent_config:read"
|
|
| "agent_config:update"
|
|
| "agent_instructions:update"
|
|
| "skill_config:update"
|
|
| "agent:read"
|
|
| "agent:wake"
|
|
| "company_scope:read"
|
|
| "decision_queue:manage"
|
|
| "decision_queue:read"
|
|
| "decision_triage:manage"
|
|
| "issue:comment"
|
|
| "issue:mutate"
|
|
| "issue:read"
|
|
| "project:read"
|
|
| "project:write_workspace"
|
|
| "runtime:manage"
|
|
| "runtime:confirm_owner_stop"
|
|
| "secrets:read"
|
|
| "secrets:propose";
|
|
|
|
export type AuthorizationResource =
|
|
| ConnectionManagementResource
|
|
| { type: "company"; companyId: string }
|
|
| { type: "agent"; companyId: string; agentId?: string | null }
|
|
| { type: "project"; companyId: string; projectId?: string | null }
|
|
| {
|
|
type: "issue";
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
issueId?: string | null;
|
|
projectId?: string | null;
|
|
parentIssueId?: string | null;
|
|
assigneeAgentId?: string | null;
|
|
assigneeUserId?: string | null;
|
|
originKind?: string | null;
|
|
originId?: string | null;
|
|
status?: string | null;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
export type AuthorizationDecision = {
|
|
allowed: boolean;
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction;
|
|
explanation: string;
|
|
inboxPolicyMode?: InboxAgentPolicyMode | "grant_override";
|
|
code?: "RESPONSIBLE_USER_UNAUTHORIZED" | "RESPONSIBLE_USER_UNAVAILABLE";
|
|
reason:
|
|
| "allow_low_trust_boundary"
|
|
| "allow_local_board"
|
|
| "allow_instance_admin"
|
|
| "allow_explicit_grant"
|
|
| "allow_role_default"
|
|
| "allow_user_inbox_policy"
|
|
| "allow_direct_change"
|
|
| "allow_consented_change"
|
|
| "allow_legacy_agent_creator"
|
|
| "allow_issue_mention_grant"
|
|
| "allow_direct_parent_report"
|
|
| "allow_visible_issue_write"
|
|
| "allow_self"
|
|
| "allow_company_agent"
|
|
| "allow_company_member"
|
|
| "allow_simple_company_member"
|
|
| "allow_manager_chain"
|
|
| "inbox_target_user_unresolved"
|
|
| "inbox_management_disabled"
|
|
| "inbox_agent_not_allowed"
|
|
| "deny_unauthenticated"
|
|
| "deny_company_boundary"
|
|
| "deny_missing_membership"
|
|
| "deny_missing_grant"
|
|
| "deny_missing_consent"
|
|
| "deny_no_grant"
|
|
| "deny_policy_restricted"
|
|
| "deny_low_trust_boundary"
|
|
| "deny_issue_private"
|
|
| "deny_project_private"
|
|
| "deny_scope"
|
|
| "deny_unsupported_action";
|
|
grant?: {
|
|
principalType: PrincipalType;
|
|
principalId: string;
|
|
permissionKey: PermissionKey;
|
|
scope: Record<string, unknown> | null;
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
type PrincipalGrantDecision = AuthorizationDecision & {
|
|
grant?: NonNullable<AuthorizationDecision["grant"]>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
function companyIdForResource(resource: AuthorizationResource) {
|
|
return resource.companyId;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function permissionForAction(action: AuthorizationAction): PermissionKey | null {
|
|
if (isConnectionManagementAction(action)) return CONNECTION_MANAGEMENT_PERMISSIONS[action];
|
|
if (action === "project:write_workspace") return "tasks:assign";
|
|
if (action === "agent_config:read" || action === "agent_config:update" || action === "agent_instructions:update" || action === "skill_config:update") {
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
action === "agent:read" ||
|
|
action === "agent:wake" ||
|
|
action === "company_scope:read" ||
|
|
action === "decision_queue:manage" ||
|
|
action === "decision_queue:read" ||
|
|
action === "decision_triage:manage" ||
|
|
action === "issue:read" ||
|
|
action === "project:read" ||
|
|
action === "runtime:manage" ||
|
|
action === "runtime:confirm_owner_stop" ||
|
|
action === "secrets:read" ||
|
|
action === "secrets:propose"
|
|
) {
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
if (action === "issue:comment" || action === "issue:mutate") return null;
|
|
return action;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function canCreateAgentsLegacy(agent: { role: string; permissions: unknown }) {
|
|
if (agent.role === "ceo") return true;
|
|
// Raw agent rows may predate permission normalization; apply the same
|
|
// defaults the agent service applies on read so enforcement matches what
|
|
// the API reports.
|
|
return normalizeAgentPermissions(agent.permissions).canCreateAgents;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function scopeValueList(value: unknown): string[] {
|
|
if (typeof value === "string" && value.trim()) return [value.trim()];
|
|
if (!Array.isArray(value)) return [];
|
|
return value
|
|
.filter((entry): entry is string => typeof entry === "string" && entry.trim().length > 0)
|
|
.map((entry) => entry.trim());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function prefixedScopeValues(grantScope: Record<string, unknown>, prefix: string) {
|
|
return scopeValueList(grantScope.allow)
|
|
.filter((rule) => rule.startsWith(prefix))
|
|
.map((rule) => rule.slice(prefix.length))
|
|
.filter((value) => value.length > 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function scopeValuesForKeys(grantScope: Record<string, unknown>, keys: string[]) {
|
|
return keys.flatMap((key) => scopeValueList(grantScope[key]));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function scopeIncludesId(ids: string[], id: string | null | undefined) {
|
|
return Boolean(id && ids.includes(id));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function isSimpleAssignableAgentStatus(status: string | null | undefined) {
|
|
return status !== "pending_approval" && status !== "terminated";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function isPlainRecord(value: unknown): value is Record<string, unknown> {
|
|
return typeof value === "object" && value !== null && !Array.isArray(value);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function objectIsEmpty(value: Record<string, unknown>) {
|
|
return Object.keys(value).length === 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function readPolicyObject(container: unknown, key: string): Record<string, unknown> | null {
|
|
if (!isPlainRecord(container)) return null;
|
|
const value = container[key];
|
|
return isPlainRecord(value) ? value : null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function readString(value: unknown): string | null {
|
|
return typeof value === "string" && value.trim().length > 0 ? value.trim() : null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function readBoolean(value: unknown): boolean | null {
|
|
return typeof value === "boolean" ? value : null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type AssignmentPolicyEffect =
|
|
| { kind: "none" }
|
|
| { kind: "restricted"; explanation: string }
|
|
| { kind: "blocked"; explanation: string }
|
|
| { kind: "unknown"; explanation: string };
|
|
|
|
type AgentHierarchyRow = { id: string; reportsTo: string | null };
|
|
type LowTrustBoundaryWithCompany = LowTrustBoundary & { companyId: string };
|
|
type AgentAuthorizationRow = {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
role: string;
|
|
status: string;
|
|
reportsTo: string | null;
|
|
permissions: Record<string, unknown> | null | undefined;
|
|
};
|
|
type ProjectAuthorizationRow = {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
executionWorkspacePolicy: unknown;
|
|
};
|
|
type IssueAuthorizationRow = {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
projectId?: string | null;
|
|
parentId: string | null;
|
|
assigneeAgentId: string | null;
|
|
assigneeUserId: string | null;
|
|
checkoutRunId: string | null;
|
|
status: string;
|
|
executionPolicy: unknown;
|
|
originKind: string | null;
|
|
originId: string | null;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
function evaluateAuthorizationPolicyForAssignment(
|
|
policy: Record<string, unknown> | null | undefined,
|
|
label: string,
|
|
): AssignmentPolicyEffect {
|
|
if (!policy || objectIsEmpty(policy)) return { kind: "none" };
|
|
|
|
const agentVisibility = readPolicyObject(policy, "agentVisibility");
|
|
const assignmentPolicy = readPolicyObject(policy, "assignmentPolicy");
|
|
const protectedAgent = readPolicyObject(policy, "protectedAgent");
|
|
// Core containment policy is understood independently of assignment policy.
|
|
// Recognizing it must not hide malformed values or unknown extension rules.
|
|
const trustSections = [
|
|
["trustPreset", trustPresetSchema],
|
|
["trustBoundary", lowTrustBoundarySchema],
|
|
["reviewPreset", lowTrustReviewPresetPolicySchema],
|
|
] as const;
|
|
const hasTrustPolicy = trustSections.some(([key]) => policy[key] !== undefined);
|
|
const hasInvalidTrustPolicy = trustSections.some(([key, schema]) =>
|
|
policy[key] !== undefined && !schema.safeParse(policy[key]).success,
|
|
);
|
|
const knownTopLevelKeys = new Set([
|
|
"agentVisibility",
|
|
"assignmentPolicy",
|
|
"protectedAgent",
|
|
"managedBy",
|
|
...trustSections.map(([key]) => key),
|
|
]);
|
|
const hasUnknownTopLevelKey = Object.keys(policy).some((key) => !knownTopLevelKeys.has(key));
|
|
const hasKnownPolicySection = Boolean(agentVisibility || assignmentPolicy || protectedAgent || hasTrustPolicy);
|
|
if (hasUnknownTopLevelKey || hasInvalidTrustPolicy || !hasKnownPolicySection) {
|
|
return {
|
|
kind: "unknown",
|
|
explanation: `${label} has authorization policy data that core cannot evaluate for task assignment.`,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const visibilityMode = readString(agentVisibility?.mode);
|
|
if (visibilityMode && visibilityMode !== "discoverable" && visibilityMode !== "private") {
|
|
return {
|
|
kind: "unknown",
|
|
explanation: `${label} has an unsupported agent visibility policy mode.`,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const assignmentMode = readString(assignmentPolicy?.mode);
|
|
if (assignmentMode && assignmentMode !== "company_default" && assignmentMode !== "protected") {
|
|
return {
|
|
kind: "unknown",
|
|
explanation: `${label} has an unsupported assignment policy mode.`,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// `requiresApproval` and `protectedAgentRequiresApproval` are legacy aliases.
|
|
// They never had an approval workflow behind them, so preserve their hard-block
|
|
// behavior without continuing to promise an approval step that does not exist.
|
|
const blockAssignment =
|
|
readBoolean(protectedAgent?.blockAssignment) === true ||
|
|
readBoolean(protectedAgent?.requiresApproval) === true ||
|
|
readBoolean(assignmentPolicy?.protectedAgentRequiresApproval) === true;
|
|
if (blockAssignment) {
|
|
return {
|
|
kind: "blocked",
|
|
explanation:
|
|
`${label} assignment is blocked by protected-agent policy. ` +
|
|
"A company administrator can remove the assignment block, then retry.",
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
visibilityMode === "private" ||
|
|
readBoolean(agentVisibility?.hiddenFromDefaultDirectory) === true
|
|
) {
|
|
return {
|
|
kind: "restricted",
|
|
explanation: `${label} is private and cannot use simple company-wide task assignment.`,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (assignmentMode === "protected") {
|
|
return {
|
|
kind: "restricted",
|
|
explanation: `${label} is protected and requires an explicit assignment grant.`,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { kind: "none" };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function agentIsInSubtree(
|
|
agentsById: Map<string, AgentHierarchyRow>,
|
|
rootAgentId: string,
|
|
targetAgentId: string,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (rootAgentId === targetAgentId) return true;
|
|
|
|
let cursor: string | null = targetAgentId;
|
|
for (let depth = 0; cursor && depth < 50; depth += 1) {
|
|
const current = agentsById.get(cursor);
|
|
if (!current) return false;
|
|
if (current.reportsTo === rootAgentId) return true;
|
|
cursor = current.reportsTo;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function loadCompanyAgentHierarchy(db: Db | DbTransaction, companyId: string) {
|
|
const rows = await db
|
|
.select({ id: agents.id, reportsTo: agents.reportsTo })
|
|
.from(agents)
|
|
.where(eq(agents.companyId, companyId));
|
|
return new Map(rows.map((agent) => [agent.id, agent]));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function isAgentInSubtree(
|
|
db: Db | DbTransaction,
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
rootAgentId: string,
|
|
targetAgentId: string,
|
|
) {
|
|
return agentIsInSubtree(
|
|
await loadCompanyAgentHierarchy(db, companyId),
|
|
rootAgentId,
|
|
targetAgentId,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function scopeAllows(
|
|
db: Db | DbTransaction,
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
grantScope: Record<string, unknown> | null,
|
|
requestedScope: Record<string, unknown> | null | undefined,
|
|
options: { requireStructuredScope?: boolean } = {},
|
|
) {
|
|
if (!grantScope || Object.keys(grantScope).length === 0) return !options.requireStructuredScope;
|
|
if (!requestedScope) return false;
|
|
|
|
const targetAssigneeAgentId =
|
|
typeof requestedScope.assigneeAgentId === "string"
|
|
? requestedScope.assigneeAgentId
|
|
: typeof requestedScope.targetAgentId === "string"
|
|
? requestedScope.targetAgentId
|
|
: null;
|
|
const requestedProjectId = typeof requestedScope.projectId === "string" ? requestedScope.projectId : null;
|
|
const requestedUserId = typeof requestedScope.userId === "string" ? requestedScope.userId : null;
|
|
let constrained = false;
|
|
|
|
for (const key of ["connection", "profile", "gateway", "provider", "purpose", "operation"] as const) {
|
|
const idKey = ["connection", "profile", "gateway"].includes(key) ? `${key}Id` : key;
|
|
const values = scopeValuesForKeys(grantScope, [idKey, `${idKey}s`]);
|
|
if (values.length === 0) {
|
|
if (Object.hasOwn(grantScope, idKey) || Object.hasOwn(grantScope, `${idKey}s`)) return false;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
constrained = true;
|
|
const requested = requestedScope[idKey];
|
|
if (!scopeIncludesId(values, typeof requested === "string" ? requested : null)) return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const projectIds = [
|
|
...scopeValueList(grantScope.projectId),
|
|
...scopeValueList(grantScope.projectIds),
|
|
...prefixedScopeValues(grantScope, "project:"),
|
|
];
|
|
if (projectIds.length > 0) {
|
|
constrained = true;
|
|
if (!scopeIncludesId(projectIds, requestedProjectId)) return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const targetAgentIds = [
|
|
...scopeValuesForKeys(grantScope, [
|
|
"agentId",
|
|
"agentIds",
|
|
"assigneeAgentId",
|
|
"assigneeAgentIds",
|
|
"targetAgentId",
|
|
"targetAgentIds",
|
|
]),
|
|
...prefixedScopeValues(grantScope, "agent:"),
|
|
];
|
|
if (targetAgentIds.length > 0) {
|
|
constrained = true;
|
|
if (!scopeIncludesId(targetAgentIds, targetAssigneeAgentId)) return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const targetUserIds = scopeValuesForKeys(grantScope, ["userId", "userIds"]);
|
|
if (targetUserIds.length > 0) {
|
|
constrained = true;
|
|
if (!scopeIncludesId(targetUserIds, requestedUserId)) return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const subtreeRootAgentIds = [
|
|
...scopeValuesForKeys(grantScope, [
|
|
"managerAgentId",
|
|
"managerAgentIds",
|
|
"managedSubtreeAgentId",
|
|
"managedSubtreeAgentIds",
|
|
"subtreeAgentId",
|
|
"subtreeAgentIds",
|
|
"subtreeRootAgentId",
|
|
"subtreeRootAgentIds",
|
|
]),
|
|
...prefixedScopeValues(grantScope, "subtree:"),
|
|
];
|
|
if (subtreeRootAgentIds.length > 0) {
|
|
constrained = true;
|
|
if (!targetAssigneeAgentId) return false;
|
|
const agentsById = await loadCompanyAgentHierarchy(db, companyId);
|
|
let matchesSubtree = false;
|
|
for (const rootAgentId of subtreeRootAgentIds) {
|
|
if (agentIsInSubtree(agentsById, rootAgentId, targetAssigneeAgentId)) {
|
|
matchesSubtree = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (!matchesSubtree) return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Unknown metadata keys do not constrain the grant. Recognized constraints
|
|
// return false above when they fail to match the requested assignment scope.
|
|
return !constrained ? true : constrained;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function allow(input: Omit<AuthorizationDecision, "allowed">): AuthorizationDecision {
|
|
return { ...input, allowed: true };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function deny(input: Omit<AuthorizationDecision, "allowed">): AuthorizationDecision {
|
|
return { ...input, allowed: false };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type ResponsibleUserSnapshot = {
|
|
userId: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
userExists: boolean;
|
|
activeMembership: { companyId: string; membershipRole?: string | null; status?: string } | null;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
type ResponsibleUserActorWithMemo = AuthorizationActor & {
|
|
__responsibleUserSnapshotMemo?: Map<string, Promise<ResponsibleUserSnapshot>>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const responsibleUserSnapshotCache = new Map<
|
|
string,
|
|
{ expiresAt: number; promise: Promise<ResponsibleUserSnapshot> }
|
|
>();
|
|
|
|
export type IssuePrivacyRow = {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
visibility: string;
|
|
privacyRootIssueId: string | null;
|
|
responsibleUserId: string | null;
|
|
createdByUserId: string | null;
|
|
assigneeUserId: string | null;
|
|
assigneeAgentId: string | null;
|
|
projectId?: string | null;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
export type ProjectPrivacyRow = {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
visibility: string;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
export function issuePrivacyMode(): "off" | "shadow" | "enforce" {
|
|
const mode = process.env.PAPERCLIP_ISSUE_PRIVACY_MODE?.trim().toLowerCase();
|
|
if (mode === "off" || mode === "shadow") return mode;
|
|
return "enforce";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function issuePrivacyPrincipal(actor: AuthorizationActor) {
|
|
if (actor.type === "board" && actor.userId) return { type: "user" as const, id: actor.userId };
|
|
if (actor.type === "agent" && actor.agentId) return { type: "agent" as const, id: actor.agentId };
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function projectPrivacyPrincipalCondition(actor: AuthorizationActor): SQL<boolean> {
|
|
const principal = issuePrivacyPrincipal(actor);
|
|
return sql<boolean>`(${projects.visibility} = 'open' or ${principal ? sql`exists (
|
|
select 1 from ${projectAccessMembers} m where m.company_id = ${projects.companyId}
|
|
and m.project_id = ${projects.id} and m.subject_type = ${principal.type}
|
|
and m.subject_id = ${principal.id})` : sql`false`})`;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function projectPrivacyCondition(actor: AuthorizationActor): SQL<boolean> {
|
|
const own = projectPrivacyPrincipalCondition(actor);
|
|
const userIds = actor.type === "agent"
|
|
? [...new Set([actor.onBehalfOfUserId, actor.authorizingUserId].filter((id): id is string => !!id))] : [];
|
|
return userIds.reduce((condition, userId) => sql<boolean>`(${condition}
|
|
and ${projectPrivacyPrincipalCondition({ type: "board", userId, ignoreInstanceAdmin: true })}
|
|
and exists (select 1 from ${companyMemberships} m where m.company_id = ${projects.companyId}
|
|
and m.principal_type = 'user' and m.principal_id = ${userId} and m.status = 'active'))`, own);
|
|
}
|
|
export async function canActorReadProjectPrivacy(db: Db | DbTransaction, actor: AuthorizationActor, project: ProjectPrivacyRow) {
|
|
return db.select({ id: projects.id }).from(projects)
|
|
.where(and(eq(projects.id, project.id), eq(projects.companyId, project.companyId), projectPrivacyCondition(actor)))
|
|
.limit(1).then(rows => rows.length > 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** One predicate for direct reads and SQL pushdown. Grants flow only from a task
|
|
* to its privacy descendants, never from a child to its ancestors or siblings.
|
|
* UNION bounds traversal even if historical data contains a cycle. */
|
|
function issuePrivacyPrincipalCondition(actor: AuthorizationActor): SQL<boolean> {
|
|
const principal = issuePrivacyPrincipal(actor);
|
|
const implicit = principal?.type === "agent"
|
|
? sql`n.assignee_agent_id = ${principal.id}`
|
|
: principal?.type === "user"
|
|
? sql`(n.responsible_user_id = ${principal.id} or n.created_by_user_id = ${principal.id} or n.assignee_user_id = ${principal.id})`
|
|
: sql`false`;
|
|
const grant = principal ? sql`exists (
|
|
select 1 from ${issueAccessGrants} g where g.issue_id = n.id
|
|
and g.subject_type = ${principal.type} and g.subject_id = ${principal.id}
|
|
and g.revoked_at is null
|
|
)` : sql`false`;
|
|
const projectMember = principal ? sql`exists (
|
|
select 1 from ${projectAccessMembers} m
|
|
join ${projects} p on p.id = m.project_id and p.company_id = m.company_id
|
|
where p.id = n.project_id and p.company_id = n.company_id and p.visibility = 'private'
|
|
and m.subject_type = ${principal.type} and m.subject_id = ${principal.id}
|
|
)` : sql`false`;
|
|
return sql<boolean>`exists (
|
|
with recursive privacy_ancestors as (
|
|
select p.id, p.company_id, p.privacy_parent_issue_id, p.visibility, p.project_id,
|
|
p.responsible_user_id, p.created_by_user_id, p.assignee_user_id, p.assignee_agent_id
|
|
from issues p where p.id = ${issues.id} and p.company_id = ${issues.companyId}
|
|
union
|
|
select p.id, p.company_id, p.privacy_parent_issue_id, p.visibility, p.project_id,
|
|
p.responsible_user_id, p.created_by_user_id, p.assignee_user_id, p.assignee_agent_id
|
|
from issues p join privacy_ancestors c on p.id = c.privacy_parent_issue_id and p.company_id = c.company_id
|
|
where p.visibility = 'private' or exists (select 1 from projects pp where pp.id = p.project_id and pp.company_id = p.company_id and pp.visibility = 'private')
|
|
)
|
|
select 1 from privacy_ancestors n
|
|
where ${implicit} or ${grant} or ${projectMember}
|
|
or not exists (
|
|
select 1 from privacy_ancestors restricted
|
|
left join projects private_project on private_project.id = restricted.project_id
|
|
and private_project.company_id = restricted.company_id
|
|
where restricted.visibility = 'private' or private_project.visibility = 'private'
|
|
)
|
|
)`;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function issuePrivacyCondition(actor: AuthorizationActor): SQL<boolean> {
|
|
const own = issuePrivacyPrincipalCondition(actor);
|
|
const userIds = actor.type === "agent"
|
|
? [...new Set([actor.onBehalfOfUserId, actor.authorizingUserId].filter((id): id is string => !!id))] : [];
|
|
// Shared agent grants cannot amplify either the task owner or external authorizer.
|
|
return userIds.reduce((condition, userId) => sql<boolean>`(${condition}
|
|
and ${issuePrivacyPrincipalCondition({ type: "board", userId, ignoreInstanceAdmin: true })}
|
|
and exists (select 1 from ${companyMemberships} m where m.company_id = ${issues.companyId}
|
|
and m.principal_type = 'user' and m.principal_id = ${userId} and m.status = 'active'))`, own);
|
|
}
|
|
export async function canActorReadIssuePrivacy(db: Db | DbTransaction, actor: AuthorizationActor, issue: IssuePrivacyRow) {
|
|
return db.select({ id: issues.id }).from(issues)
|
|
.where(and(eq(issues.id, issue.id), eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId), issuePrivacyCondition(actor)))
|
|
.limit(1).then(rows => rows.length > 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Filter every externally reachable task query with the same privacy predicate. */
|
|
export async function issueReadSqlCondition(db: Db | DbTransaction, actor: AuthorizationActor): Promise<SQL<boolean>> {
|
|
if (actor.authorizingUserId) return issuePrivacyCondition(actor);
|
|
if (issuePrivacyMode() !== "enforce") return sql<boolean>`true`;
|
|
if (actor.source === "local_implicit" || actor.isInstanceAdmin) return sql<boolean>`true`;
|
|
if (actor.type === "board" && !actor.ignoreInstanceAdmin && actor.source !== "cloud_tenant"
|
|
&& await db.select({ id: instanceUserRoles.id }).from(instanceUserRoles)
|
|
.where(and(eq(instanceUserRoles.userId, actor.userId ?? ""), eq(instanceUserRoles.role, "instance_admin")))
|
|
.limit(1).then(rows => rows.length > 0)) return sql<boolean>`true`;
|
|
return issuePrivacyCondition(actor);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** SQL equivalent used for project list/search pushdown. */
|
|
export async function projectReadSqlCondition(db: Db | DbTransaction, actor: AuthorizationActor): Promise<SQL<boolean>> {
|
|
if (actor.authorizingUserId) return projectPrivacyCondition(actor);
|
|
if (issuePrivacyMode() !== "enforce") return sql<boolean>`true`;
|
|
if (actor.source === "local_implicit" || actor.isInstanceAdmin) return sql<boolean>`true`;
|
|
if (
|
|
actor.type === "board"
|
|
&& !actor.ignoreInstanceAdmin
|
|
&& actor.source !== "cloud_tenant"
|
|
&& Boolean(await db
|
|
.select({ id: instanceUserRoles.id })
|
|
.from(instanceUserRoles)
|
|
.where(and(
|
|
eq(instanceUserRoles.userId, actor.userId ?? ""),
|
|
eq(instanceUserRoles.role, "instance_admin"),
|
|
))
|
|
.limit(1)
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null))
|
|
) return sql<boolean>`true`;
|
|
return projectPrivacyCondition(actor);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function responsibleUserSnapshotTtlMs() {
|
|
const raw = process.env.PAPERCLIP_RESPONSIBLE_USER_AUTHZ_CACHE_TTL_MS?.trim();
|
|
if (!raw) return 5_000;
|
|
const parsed = Number(raw);
|
|
return Number.isFinite(parsed) && parsed >= 0 ? parsed : 5_000;
|
|
}
|
|
export function responsibleUserAuthzShadowMode() {
|
|
const mode = process.env.PAPERCLIP_RESPONSIBLE_USER_AUTHZ_MODE?.trim().toLowerCase();
|
|
const shadow = process.env.PAPERCLIP_RESPONSIBLE_USER_AUTHZ_SHADOW?.trim().toLowerCase();
|
|
return mode === "shadow" || shadow === "1" || shadow === "true" || shadow === "yes";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function activeActorMembership(
|
|
memberships: Array<{ companyId: string; membershipRole?: string | null; status?: string }> | null | undefined,
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
) {
|
|
return memberships?.find((membership) => membership.companyId === companyId && membership.status === "active") ?? null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function activeResponsibleUserCanAuthorizeIssueAction(
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction,
|
|
membership: ResponsibleUserSnapshot["activeMembership"],
|
|
) {
|
|
return Boolean(
|
|
membership &&
|
|
membership.status === "active" &&
|
|
membership.membershipRole !== "viewer" &&
|
|
(action === "issue:comment" || action === "issue:mutate")
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function activeResponsibleUserCanAuthorizeAgentGrantedSkillChange(
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction,
|
|
membership: ResponsibleUserSnapshot["activeMembership"],
|
|
agentDecision: AuthorizationDecision,
|
|
actorAgentId: string | null | undefined,
|
|
) {
|
|
return Boolean(
|
|
action === "skill_config:update" &&
|
|
membership &&
|
|
membership.status === "active" &&
|
|
membership.membershipRole !== "viewer" &&
|
|
agentDecision.allowed &&
|
|
(agentDecision.reason === "allow_direct_change" || agentDecision.reason === "allow_consented_change") &&
|
|
agentDecision.grant?.principalType === "agent" &&
|
|
agentDecision.grant.principalId === actorAgentId &&
|
|
(agentDecision.grant.permissionKey === "skills:create" ||
|
|
agentDecision.grant.permissionKey === "skills:suggest-changes"),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function scopeBoolean(scope: Record<string, unknown> | null | undefined, key: string) {
|
|
return scope?.[key] === true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export function authorizationDeniedDetails(decision: AuthorizationDecision) {
|
|
return {
|
|
...(decision.code ? { code: decision.code } : {}),
|
|
reason: decision.reason,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type DbTransaction = Parameters<Parameters<Db["transaction"]>[0]>[0];
|
|
|
|
type ReadAuthorizationSnapshot = {
|
|
issues: Map<string, IssueAuthorizationRow & IssuePrivacyRow & { readable: boolean }>;
|
|
projects: Map<string, ProjectAuthorizationRow & ProjectPrivacyRow & { readable: boolean }>;
|
|
runs: Map<string, { companyId: string; agentId: string; contextSnapshot: Record<string, unknown> } | null>;
|
|
memo: Map<string, Promise<unknown>>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
type ReadAuthorizationResource = Extract<AuthorizationResource, { type: "issue" | "project" | "company" }>;
|
|
|
|
export function authorizationService(db: Db | DbTransaction) {
|
|
return createAuthorizationService(db);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function createAuthorizationService(db: Db | DbTransaction, readSnapshot?: ReadAuthorizationSnapshot) {
|
|
function batchRead<T>(key: string, read: () => Promise<T>): Promise<T> {
|
|
if (!readSnapshot) return read();
|
|
let result = readSnapshot.memo.get(key);
|
|
if (!result) { result = read(); readSnapshot.memo.set(key, result); }
|
|
return result as Promise<T>;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function decideReads(actor: AuthorizationActor, resources: ReadAuthorizationResource[]): Promise<AuthorizationDecision[]> {
|
|
return (await decideReadsForActors([actor], resources))[0];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function decideReadsForActors(actors: AuthorizationActor[], resources: ReadAuthorizationResource[]): Promise<AuthorizationDecision[][]> {
|
|
if (!actors.length) return [];
|
|
const memo = new Map<string, Promise<unknown>>();
|
|
const runs: ReadAuthorizationSnapshot["runs"] = new Map();
|
|
const snapshots: ReadAuthorizationSnapshot[] = actors.map(() => ({ issues: new Map(), projects: new Map(), runs, memo }));
|
|
const batchActors: ResponsibleUserActorWithMemo[] = actors.map(actor => ({ ...actor, __responsibleUserSnapshotMemo: undefined }));
|
|
// Only canonical IDs take this fast path. Other inputs keep the ordinary
|
|
// lookup behavior, including PostgreSQL's handling of invalid UUIDs.
|
|
const runIds = resources.length ? [...new Set(batchActors.flatMap(actor => actor.type === "agent" && actor.runId
|
|
&& /^[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12}$/.test(actor.runId) ? [actor.runId] : []))] : [];
|
|
for (let offset = 0; offset < runIds.length; offset += 500) {
|
|
const ids = runIds.slice(offset, offset + 500);
|
|
for (const id of ids) runs.set(id, null);
|
|
const rows = await db.select({ id: heartbeatRuns.id, companyId: heartbeatRuns.companyId, agentId: heartbeatRuns.agentId,
|
|
contextSnapshot: sql<Record<string, unknown>>`jsonb_build_object('executionPolicy', ${heartbeatRuns.contextSnapshot}->'executionPolicy')`,
|
|
}).from(heartbeatRuns).where(inArray(heartbeatRuns.id, ids));
|
|
for (const row of rows) runs.set(row.id, row);
|
|
}
|
|
const privacyKey = (actor: AuthorizationActor) => JSON.stringify([actor.type, actor.agentId, actor.userId, actor.onBehalfOfUserId]);
|
|
const privacyActors = [...new Map(batchActors.map(actor => [privacyKey(actor), actor])).values()];
|
|
const privacyIndexes = batchActors.map(actor => privacyActors.findIndex(peer => privacyKey(peer) === privacyKey(actor)));
|
|
const issueIds = [...new Set(resources.flatMap(resource => resource.type === "issue" && resource.issueId ? [resource.issueId] : []))];
|
|
const projectIds = new Set(resources.flatMap(resource => resource.type === "project" && resource.projectId ? [resource.projectId]
|
|
: resource.type === "issue" && resource.projectId ? [resource.projectId] : []));
|
|
for (let offset = 0; offset < issueIds.length; offset += 500) {
|
|
const rows = await db.select({
|
|
id: issues.id, companyId: issues.companyId, projectId: issues.projectId, parentId: issues.parentId,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: issues.assigneeAgentId, assigneeUserId: issues.assigneeUserId, checkoutRunId: issues.checkoutRunId,
|
|
status: issues.status, executionPolicy: issues.executionPolicy, originKind: issues.originKind, originId: issues.originId,
|
|
visibility: issues.visibility, privacyRootIssueId: issues.privacyRootIssueId,
|
|
responsibleUserId: issues.responsibleUserId, createdByUserId: issues.createdByUserId,
|
|
readable: sql<boolean[]>`ARRAY[${sql.join(privacyActors.map(actor => issuePrivacyCondition(actor)), sql`, `)}]`,
|
|
}).from(issues).where(inArray(issues.id, issueIds.slice(offset, offset + 500)));
|
|
for (const row of rows) {
|
|
for (let index = 0; index < snapshots.length; index++) snapshots[index].issues.set(row.id, { ...row, readable: row.readable[privacyIndexes[index]] });
|
|
if (row.projectId) projectIds.add(row.projectId);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
const ids = [...projectIds];
|
|
for (let offset = 0; offset < ids.length; offset += 500) {
|
|
const rows = await db.select({ id: projects.id, companyId: projects.companyId,
|
|
executionWorkspacePolicy: projects.executionWorkspacePolicy, visibility: projects.visibility,
|
|
readable: sql<boolean[]>`ARRAY[${sql.join(privacyActors.map(actor => projectPrivacyCondition(actor)), sql`, `)}]`,
|
|
}).from(projects).where(inArray(projects.id, ids.slice(offset, offset + 500)));
|
|
for (const row of rows) for (let index = 0; index < snapshots.length; index++) {
|
|
snapshots[index].projects.set(row.id, { ...row, readable: row.readable[privacyIndexes[index]] });
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
const results: AuthorizationDecision[][] = [];
|
|
for (let index = 0; index < batchActors.length; index++) {
|
|
const batch = createAuthorizationService(db, snapshots[index]);
|
|
const decisions: AuthorizationDecision[] = [];
|
|
for (const resource of resources) decisions.push(await batch.decide({ actor: batchActors[index], resource,
|
|
action: resource.type === "issue" ? "issue:read" : resource.type === "project" ? "project:read" : "company_scope:read" }));
|
|
results.push(decisions);
|
|
}
|
|
return results;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function isInstanceAdmin(userId: string | null | undefined): Promise<boolean> {
|
|
if (!userId) return false;
|
|
return batchRead(`admin:${userId}`, async () => {
|
|
if (
|
|
await db
|
|
.select({ id: instanceUserRoles.id })
|
|
.from(instanceUserRoles)
|
|
.where(and(eq(instanceUserRoles.userId, userId), eq(instanceUserRoles.role, "instance_admin")))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null)
|
|
) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function getActiveMembership(
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
principalType: PrincipalType,
|
|
principalId: string,
|
|
) {
|
|
return batchRead(`membership:${companyId}:${principalType}:${principalId}`, async () => {
|
|
return db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(companyMemberships)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.companyId, companyId),
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.principalType, principalType),
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.principalId, principalId),
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.status, "active"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function loadResponsibleUserSnapshot(companyId: string, userId: string): Promise<ResponsibleUserSnapshot> {
|
|
const [user, membership] = await Promise.all([
|
|
db
|
|
.select({ id: authUsers.id })
|
|
.from(authUsers)
|
|
.where(eq(authUsers.id, userId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null),
|
|
db
|
|
.select({
|
|
companyId: companyMemberships.companyId,
|
|
membershipRole: companyMemberships.membershipRole,
|
|
status: companyMemberships.status,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(companyMemberships)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.companyId, companyId),
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.principalType, "user"),
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.principalId, userId),
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.status, "active"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null),
|
|
]);
|
|
return {
|
|
userId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
userExists: Boolean(user),
|
|
activeMembership: user ? membership : null,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function getResponsibleUserSnapshot(input: {
|
|
actor: AuthorizationActor;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
userId: string;
|
|
}): Promise<ResponsibleUserSnapshot> {
|
|
const actorWithMemo = input.actor as ResponsibleUserActorWithMemo;
|
|
const key = `${input.companyId}:${input.userId}`;
|
|
actorWithMemo.__responsibleUserSnapshotMemo ??= new Map();
|
|
const requestMemo = actorWithMemo.__responsibleUserSnapshotMemo.get(key);
|
|
if (requestMemo) return requestMemo;
|
|
|
|
const actorMembership = input.actor.onBehalfOfUserId === input.userId
|
|
? activeActorMembership(input.actor.onBehalfOfMemberships, input.companyId)
|
|
: null;
|
|
if (actorMembership) {
|
|
const promise = Promise.resolve({
|
|
userId: input.userId,
|
|
companyId: input.companyId,
|
|
userExists: true,
|
|
activeMembership: actorMembership,
|
|
});
|
|
actorWithMemo.__responsibleUserSnapshotMemo.set(key, promise);
|
|
return promise;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const promise = batchRead(`responsible:${input.companyId}:${input.userId}`,
|
|
() => loadResponsibleUserSnapshot(input.companyId, input.userId));
|
|
actorWithMemo.__responsibleUserSnapshotMemo.set(key, promise);
|
|
void promise.catch(() => {
|
|
if (actorWithMemo.__responsibleUserSnapshotMemo?.get(key) === promise) {
|
|
actorWithMemo.__responsibleUserSnapshotMemo.delete(key);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
return promise;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function findGrant(
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
principalType: PrincipalType,
|
|
principalId: string,
|
|
permissionKey: PermissionKey,
|
|
) {
|
|
return db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(principalPermissionGrants)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(principalPermissionGrants.companyId, companyId),
|
|
eq(principalPermissionGrants.principalType, principalType),
|
|
eq(principalPermissionGrants.principalId, principalId),
|
|
eq(principalPermissionGrants.permissionKey, permissionKey),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function decidePrincipalGrant(input: {
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
principalType: PrincipalType;
|
|
principalId: string;
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction;
|
|
permissionKey: PermissionKey;
|
|
scope?: Record<string, unknown> | null;
|
|
}): Promise<PrincipalGrantDecision> {
|
|
const membership = await getActiveMembership(input.companyId, input.principalType, input.principalId);
|
|
if (!membership) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_membership",
|
|
explanation: `${input.principalType} principal ${input.principalId} is not an active member of company ${input.companyId}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const grant = await findGrant(input.companyId, input.principalType, input.principalId, input.permissionKey);
|
|
if (!grant) {
|
|
if (
|
|
input.principalType === "user"
|
|
&& input.permissionKey.startsWith("tools:")
|
|
&& (membership.membershipRole === "owner" || membership.membershipRole === "admin")
|
|
&& grantsForHumanRole(normalizeHumanRole(membership.membershipRole, "operator"))
|
|
.some((defaultGrant) => defaultGrant.permissionKey === input.permissionKey)
|
|
) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_role_default",
|
|
explanation: `Allowed by the ${membership.membershipRole ?? "operator"} membership role.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_grant",
|
|
explanation: `Missing permission: ${input.permissionKey}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
!(await scopeAllows(db, input.companyId, grant.scope, input.scope, {
|
|
requireStructuredScope: input.permissionKey === "tasks:assign_scope",
|
|
}))
|
|
) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_scope",
|
|
explanation: `Permission ${input.permissionKey} does not cover the requested scope.`,
|
|
grant: {
|
|
principalType: input.principalType,
|
|
principalId: input.principalId,
|
|
permissionKey: input.permissionKey,
|
|
scope: grant.scope ?? null,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_explicit_grant",
|
|
explanation: `Allowed by explicit grant ${input.permissionKey}.`,
|
|
grant: {
|
|
principalType: input.principalType,
|
|
principalId: input.principalId,
|
|
permissionKey: input.permissionKey,
|
|
scope: grant.scope ?? null,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function loadAgent(agentId: string): Promise<AgentAuthorizationRow | null> {
|
|
return batchRead(`agent:${agentId}`, async () => {
|
|
return db
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: agents.id,
|
|
companyId: agents.companyId,
|
|
role: agents.role,
|
|
status: agents.status,
|
|
reportsTo: agents.reportsTo,
|
|
permissions: agents.permissions,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(agents)
|
|
.where(eq(agents.id, agentId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function loadProject(projectId: string): Promise<ProjectAuthorizationRow | null> {
|
|
if (readSnapshot?.projects.has(projectId)) return readSnapshot.projects.get(projectId)!;
|
|
return db
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: projects.id,
|
|
companyId: projects.companyId,
|
|
executionWorkspacePolicy: projects.executionWorkspacePolicy,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(projects)
|
|
.where(eq(projects.id, projectId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function loadIssue(issueId: string): Promise<IssueAuthorizationRow | null> {
|
|
if (readSnapshot?.issues.has(issueId)) return readSnapshot.issues.get(issueId)!;
|
|
return db
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: issues.id,
|
|
companyId: issues.companyId,
|
|
projectId: issues.projectId,
|
|
parentId: issues.parentId,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: issues.assigneeAgentId,
|
|
assigneeUserId: issues.assigneeUserId,
|
|
checkoutRunId: issues.checkoutRunId,
|
|
status: issues.status,
|
|
executionPolicy: issues.executionPolicy,
|
|
originKind: issues.originKind,
|
|
originId: issues.originId,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, issueId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function loadRunPolicy(runId: string | null | undefined, companyId: string, agentId: string) {
|
|
return batchRead(`run:${companyId}:${agentId}:${runId}`, async () => {
|
|
if (!runId) return null;
|
|
const row = readSnapshot?.runs.has(runId) ? readSnapshot.runs.get(runId) : await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: heartbeatRuns.id,
|
|
companyId: heartbeatRuns.companyId,
|
|
agentId: heartbeatRuns.agentId,
|
|
contextSnapshot: sql<Record<string, unknown>>`jsonb_build_object('executionPolicy', ${heartbeatRuns.contextSnapshot}->'executionPolicy')`,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(heartbeatRuns)
|
|
.where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, runId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (!row || row.companyId !== companyId || row.agentId !== agentId) return null;
|
|
const context = isPlainRecord(row.contextSnapshot) ? row.contextSnapshot : null;
|
|
return isPlainRecord(context?.executionPolicy)
|
|
? { companyId: row.companyId, executionPolicy: context.executionPolicy }
|
|
: null;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function loadRunIssueId(runId: string | null | undefined, companyId: string, agentId: string) {
|
|
if (!runId) return null;
|
|
const row = await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
issueId: heartbeatRuns.issueId,
|
|
companyId: heartbeatRuns.companyId,
|
|
agentId: heartbeatRuns.agentId,
|
|
contextSnapshot: sql<Record<string, unknown>>`jsonb_build_object('issueId', ${heartbeatRuns.contextSnapshot}->'issueId', 'taskId', ${heartbeatRuns.contextSnapshot}->'taskId')`,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(heartbeatRuns)
|
|
.where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, runId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (!row || row.companyId !== companyId || row.agentId !== agentId) return null;
|
|
const context = isPlainRecord(row.contextSnapshot) ? row.contextSnapshot : null;
|
|
const issueId = row.issueId ?? (typeof context?.issueId === "string"
|
|
? context.issueId.trim()
|
|
: typeof context?.taskId === "string"
|
|
? context.taskId.trim()
|
|
: "");
|
|
return issueId || null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function isDirectParentReportTarget(input: {
|
|
actor: AuthorizationActor;
|
|
actorAgentId: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
resource: AuthorizationResource;
|
|
}) {
|
|
if (input.resource.type !== "issue" || !input.resource.issueId) return false;
|
|
const runIssueId = await loadRunIssueId(input.actor.runId, input.companyId, input.actorAgentId);
|
|
if (!runIssueId || runIssueId === input.resource.issueId) return false;
|
|
const runIssue = await loadIssue(runIssueId);
|
|
return Boolean(
|
|
runIssue &&
|
|
runIssue.companyId === input.companyId &&
|
|
runIssue.assigneeAgentId === input.actorAgentId &&
|
|
runIssue.checkoutRunId === input.actor.runId &&
|
|
runIssue.parentId === input.resource.issueId,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function loadProjectAuthorizationPolicy(companyId: string, projectId: string) {
|
|
const row = await db
|
|
.select({ executionWorkspacePolicy: projects.executionWorkspacePolicy })
|
|
.from(projects)
|
|
.where(and(eq(projects.id, projectId), eq(projects.companyId, companyId)))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
return readPolicyObject(row?.executionWorkspacePolicy, "authorizationPolicy");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function loadIssueAuthorizationPolicy(companyId: string, issueId: string) {
|
|
const row = await db
|
|
.select({ executionPolicy: issues.executionPolicy })
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(and(eq(issues.id, issueId), eq(issues.companyId, companyId)))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
return readPolicyObject(row?.executionPolicy, "authorizationPolicy");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function loadResourceContext(resource: AuthorizationResource) {
|
|
const issue = (resource.type === "issue" || resource.type === "connection_management") && resource.issueId ? await loadIssue(resource.issueId) : null;
|
|
const projectId =
|
|
resource.type === "issue" || resource.type === "connection_management"
|
|
? issue?.projectId ?? resource.projectId ?? null
|
|
: resource.type === "project"
|
|
? resource.projectId ?? null
|
|
: null;
|
|
const project = projectId ? await loadProject(projectId) : null;
|
|
return { issue, project };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function resolveActorTrust(input: {
|
|
actorAgent: AgentAuthorizationRow;
|
|
actor: AuthorizationActor;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
resource: AuthorizationResource;
|
|
}): Promise<TrustPresetResolution> {
|
|
const runIssueId = input.resource.type === "connection_management"
|
|
? await loadRunIssueId(input.actor.runId, input.companyId, input.actorAgent.id)
|
|
: null;
|
|
const { issue, project } = await loadResourceContext(runIssueId
|
|
? { type: "issue", companyId: input.companyId, issueId: runIssueId }
|
|
: input.resource);
|
|
const run = await loadRunPolicy(input.actor.runId, input.companyId, input.actorAgent.id);
|
|
const resolution = resolveCoreTrustPreset({
|
|
companyId: input.companyId,
|
|
agent: input.actorAgent,
|
|
project,
|
|
issue,
|
|
run,
|
|
});
|
|
if (!input.actor.runId || resolution.kind !== "low_trust_review") return resolution;
|
|
return withHumanDirectedWork(db, resolution, {
|
|
companyId: input.companyId, agentId: input.actorAgent.id, runId: input.actor.runId,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function issueIdIsDescendantOf(issueId: string, rootIssueId: string, companyId: string) {
|
|
const rows = await db.execute(sql`
|
|
WITH RECURSIVE ancestors(id, parent_id, depth) AS (
|
|
SELECT id, parent_id, 0
|
|
FROM issues
|
|
WHERE company_id = ${companyId}
|
|
AND id = ${issueId}
|
|
UNION ALL
|
|
SELECT parent.id, parent.parent_id, ancestors.depth + 1
|
|
FROM issues parent
|
|
JOIN ancestors ON parent.id = ancestors.parent_id
|
|
WHERE parent.company_id = ${companyId}
|
|
AND ancestors.depth < ${LOW_TRUST_ISSUE_ANCESTRY_MAX_DEPTH - 1}
|
|
)
|
|
SELECT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM ancestors WHERE id = ${rootIssueId}) AS is_descendant
|
|
`);
|
|
const first = Array.isArray(rows) ? rows[0] : null;
|
|
return Boolean(
|
|
first &&
|
|
typeof first === "object" &&
|
|
(first as Record<string, unknown>).is_descendant === true,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function issueResourceWithinLowTrustBoundary(
|
|
boundary: LowTrustBoundaryWithCompany,
|
|
resource: Extract<AuthorizationResource, { type: "issue" }>,
|
|
) {
|
|
const issue = resource.issueId ? await loadIssue(resource.issueId) : null;
|
|
const candidate = {
|
|
companyId: resource.companyId,
|
|
id: issue?.id ?? resource.issueId ?? null,
|
|
projectId: issue?.projectId ?? resource.projectId ?? null,
|
|
};
|
|
if (isIssueWithinLowTrustBoundary(boundary, candidate)) return true;
|
|
if (candidate.id && boundary.rootIssueId) {
|
|
return issueIdIsDescendantOf(candidate.id, boundary.rootIssueId, boundary.companyId);
|
|
}
|
|
// Only an explicit root scope includes descendants. A parent in a permitted
|
|
// project (or an exact issue-id scope) cannot authorize a child elsewhere.
|
|
if (!resource.parentIssueId || !boundary.rootIssueId) return false;
|
|
const parent = await loadIssue(resource.parentIssueId);
|
|
if (!parent || parent.companyId !== boundary.companyId) return false;
|
|
// Root ancestry permits decomposition, not selection of an unrelated
|
|
// project. Projectless children remain possible for projectless roots.
|
|
if (candidate.projectId && !await projectWithinLowTrustBoundary(boundary, candidate.projectId)) return false;
|
|
return parent.id === boundary.rootIssueId ||
|
|
issueIdIsDescendantOf(parent.id, boundary.rootIssueId, boundary.companyId);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function projectWithinLowTrustBoundary(
|
|
boundary: LowTrustBoundaryWithCompany,
|
|
projectId: string | null | undefined,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (!projectId) return false;
|
|
if (boundary.projectIds?.includes(projectId)) return true;
|
|
if (!boundary.rootIssueId) return false;
|
|
const rootIssue = await loadIssue(boundary.rootIssueId);
|
|
return rootIssue?.companyId === boundary.companyId && rootIssue.projectId === projectId;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function agentWithinLowTrustBoundary(
|
|
boundary: LowTrustBoundaryWithCompany,
|
|
actorAgentId: string,
|
|
targetAgentId: string | null | undefined,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (!targetAgentId) return false;
|
|
return targetAgentId === actorAgentId || Boolean(boundary.allowedAgentIds?.includes(targetAgentId));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function decideLowTrustAccess(input: {
|
|
actorAgentId: string;
|
|
actor: AuthorizationActor;
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction;
|
|
resource: AuthorizationResource;
|
|
resolution: TrustPresetResolution;
|
|
directParentReportTarget: boolean;
|
|
}): Promise<AuthorizationDecision | null> {
|
|
if (input.resolution.kind === "standard") return null;
|
|
if (input.resolution.kind === "denied") {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_policy_restricted",
|
|
explanation: input.resolution.detail,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const boundary = input.resolution.boundary;
|
|
const lowTrustDeny = (explanation: string) =>
|
|
deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_low_trust_boundary",
|
|
explanation,
|
|
});
|
|
const lowTrustAllow = (explanation: string) =>
|
|
allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_low_trust_boundary",
|
|
explanation,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "agent_instructions:update") {
|
|
if (input.resource.type === "agent" && input.resource.agentId === input.actorAgentId &&
|
|
await hasOwnerChatInstructionAuthority(db, {
|
|
companyId: boundary.companyId,
|
|
agentId: input.actorAgentId,
|
|
runId: input.actor.runId,
|
|
userId: input.actor.onBehalfOfUserId,
|
|
})) {
|
|
// Continue through self-instruction permissions, explicit protected
|
|
// change restrictions, and the responsible user's current edit access.
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
return lowTrustDeny(
|
|
"This low-trust run cannot change persistent agent instructions, including AGENTS.md. Self-edits require a direct message in the authorized user's chat with this agent. Outside-triggered work and subtasks do not inherit that authority; ask the authorized user to request the edit in their chat or apply it directly.",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
isConnectionManagementAction(input.action) ||
|
|
input.action === "company_scope:read" ||
|
|
// Agent creation is a company-wide privileged action. The default-on
|
|
// canCreateAgents flag must never reach the legacy creator allow when
|
|
// the effective execution context (agent, project, issue, or run
|
|
// policy) resolves to low trust.
|
|
input.action === "agents:create" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_triage:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "agent_config:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "agent_config:update" ||
|
|
input.action === "skill_config:update" ||
|
|
input.action === "inbox:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "runtime:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:propose"
|
|
) {
|
|
return lowTrustDeny(
|
|
`${LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET} agents cannot use company-wide or privileged ${input.action} APIs by default.`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "agent:read" || input.action === "agent:wake") {
|
|
if (input.resource.type !== "agent") {
|
|
return lowTrustDeny("Low-trust agent action is missing an agent resource.");
|
|
}
|
|
return agentWithinLowTrustBoundary(boundary, input.actorAgentId, input.resource.agentId)
|
|
? lowTrustAllow("Allowed inside the low-trust agent boundary.")
|
|
: lowTrustDeny("Agent is outside this low-trust boundary.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "project:read") {
|
|
const projectId =
|
|
input.resource.type === "issue"
|
|
? input.resource.projectId
|
|
: input.resource.type === "project"
|
|
? input.resource.projectId
|
|
: null;
|
|
return await projectWithinLowTrustBoundary(boundary, projectId)
|
|
? lowTrustAllow("Allowed inside the low-trust project boundary.")
|
|
: lowTrustDeny("Project is outside this low-trust boundary.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "issue:comment" || input.action === "issue:read" || input.action === "issue:mutate") {
|
|
if (input.resource.type !== "issue") {
|
|
return lowTrustDeny("Low-trust issue access is missing an issue resource.");
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.resolution.humanDirectedIssueId && input.resource.companyId === boundary.companyId &&
|
|
input.resource.issueId === input.resolution.humanDirectedIssueId) {
|
|
return lowTrustAllow("Allowed on the exact task directed by an authenticated human.");
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.action === "issue:comment" && input.directParentReportTarget) {
|
|
if (
|
|
input.resource.issueId &&
|
|
await agentHasMentionGrantOnIssue({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
companyId: boundary.companyId,
|
|
issueId: input.resource.issueId,
|
|
issueAssigneeAgentId: input.resource.assigneeAgentId ?? null,
|
|
actorAgentId: input.actorAgentId,
|
|
})
|
|
) {
|
|
return allowIssueMentionGrant(input.action);
|
|
}
|
|
return lowTrustDeny("Direct-parent report comments are disabled for low-trust review runs.");
|
|
}
|
|
if (await issueResourceWithinLowTrustBoundary(boundary, input.resource)) {
|
|
return lowTrustAllow("Allowed inside the low-trust issue boundary.");
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action !== "issue:mutate" &&
|
|
input.resource.issueId &&
|
|
await agentHasMentionGrantOnIssue({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
companyId: boundary.companyId,
|
|
issueId: input.resource.issueId,
|
|
issueAssigneeAgentId: input.resource.assigneeAgentId ?? null,
|
|
actorAgentId: input.actorAgentId,
|
|
})
|
|
) {
|
|
return allowIssueMentionGrant(input.action);
|
|
}
|
|
return lowTrustDeny("Issue is outside this low-trust boundary.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "tasks:assign" || input.action === "project:write_workspace") {
|
|
if (input.resource.type !== "issue") {
|
|
return lowTrustDeny("Low-trust task assignment is missing an issue resource.");
|
|
}
|
|
if (!(await issueResourceWithinLowTrustBoundary(boundary, input.resource))) {
|
|
return lowTrustDeny("Task target is outside this low-trust boundary.");
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.resource.assigneeUserId) {
|
|
return lowTrustDeny("Low-trust agents cannot assign work to board users.");
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
input.resource.assigneeAgentId &&
|
|
!agentWithinLowTrustBoundary(boundary, input.actorAgentId, input.resource.assigneeAgentId)
|
|
) {
|
|
return lowTrustDeny("Assignee agent is outside this low-trust boundary.");
|
|
}
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function taskBridgeScopeIds(
|
|
scope: TaskBridgeAgentKeyScope,
|
|
singularKey: "projectId" | "parentIssueId",
|
|
pluralKey: "projectIds" | "parentIssueIds",
|
|
) {
|
|
return [
|
|
...(typeof scope[singularKey] === "string" ? [scope[singularKey]] : []),
|
|
...(Array.isArray(scope[pluralKey]) ? scope[pluralKey] : []),
|
|
].filter((value): value is string => typeof value === "string" && value.length > 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function parentIssueMatchesTaskBridgeBoundary(
|
|
parentIssueId: string | null | undefined,
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
allowedParentIssueIds: string[],
|
|
) {
|
|
if (!parentIssueId || allowedParentIssueIds.length === 0) return false;
|
|
if (allowedParentIssueIds.includes(parentIssueId)) return true;
|
|
for (const rootIssueId of allowedParentIssueIds) {
|
|
if (await issueIdIsDescendantOf(parentIssueId, rootIssueId, companyId)) return true;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function issueMatchesTaskBridgeCreateBoundary(
|
|
scope: TaskBridgeAgentKeyScope,
|
|
resource: Extract<AuthorizationResource, { type: "issue" }>,
|
|
) {
|
|
const allowedProjectIds = taskBridgeScopeIds(scope, "projectId", "projectIds");
|
|
const allowedParentIssueIds = taskBridgeScopeIds(scope, "parentIssueId", "parentIssueIds");
|
|
if (resource.projectId && allowedProjectIds.includes(resource.projectId)) return true;
|
|
if (await parentIssueMatchesTaskBridgeBoundary(resource.parentIssueId, resource.companyId, allowedParentIssueIds)) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
if (resource.parentIssueId && allowedProjectIds.length > 0) {
|
|
const parent = await loadIssue(resource.parentIssueId);
|
|
if (parent?.companyId === resource.companyId && parent.projectId && allowedProjectIds.includes(parent.projectId)) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function issueMatchesTaskBridgeWriteBoundary(input: {
|
|
actorAgentId: string;
|
|
keyId: string;
|
|
resource: Extract<AuthorizationResource, { type: "issue" }>;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const issue = input.resource.issueId ? await loadIssue(input.resource.issueId) : null;
|
|
const assigneeAgentId = issue?.assigneeAgentId ?? input.resource.assigneeAgentId ?? null;
|
|
if (assigneeAgentId === input.actorAgentId) return true;
|
|
const originKind = issue?.originKind ?? input.resource.originKind ?? null;
|
|
const originId = issue?.originId ?? input.resource.originId ?? null;
|
|
return originKind === "task_bridge" && originId === input.keyId;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function decideTaskBridgeAccess(input: {
|
|
actorAgentId: string;
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction;
|
|
resource: AuthorizationResource;
|
|
scope: TaskBridgeAgentKeyScope;
|
|
keyId: string;
|
|
}): Promise<AuthorizationDecision | null> {
|
|
const denyBridge = (explanation: string) =>
|
|
deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_scope",
|
|
explanation,
|
|
});
|
|
const allowBridge = (explanation: string) =>
|
|
allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_explicit_grant",
|
|
explanation,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action === "company_scope:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_triage:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "agent:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "agent:wake" ||
|
|
input.action === "project:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "project:write_workspace" ||
|
|
input.action === "runtime:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:propose"
|
|
) {
|
|
return denyBridge("Task bridge keys cannot use company-wide, peer-agent, project, runtime, or secret APIs.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "tasks:assign") {
|
|
if (input.resource.type !== "issue") {
|
|
return denyBridge("Task bridge assignment requires an issue resource.");
|
|
}
|
|
if (!(await issueMatchesTaskBridgeCreateBoundary(input.scope, input.resource))) {
|
|
return denyBridge("Task bridge key is outside its approved parent or project boundary.");
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.resource.assigneeUserId) {
|
|
return denyBridge("Task bridge keys cannot assign work to board users.");
|
|
}
|
|
const allowedAssigneeAgentIds = input.scope.allowedAssigneeAgentIds ?? [];
|
|
if (
|
|
input.resource.assigneeAgentId &&
|
|
input.resource.assigneeAgentId !== input.actorAgentId &&
|
|
!allowedAssigneeAgentIds.includes(input.resource.assigneeAgentId)
|
|
) {
|
|
return denyBridge("Task bridge key cannot assign work to that agent.");
|
|
}
|
|
return allowBridge("Allowed by task bridge create boundary.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "issue:read" || input.action === "issue:comment" || input.action === "issue:mutate") {
|
|
if (input.resource.type !== "issue") {
|
|
return denyBridge("Task bridge issue access requires an issue resource.");
|
|
}
|
|
return await issueMatchesTaskBridgeWriteBoundary({
|
|
actorAgentId: input.actorAgentId,
|
|
keyId: input.keyId,
|
|
resource: input.resource,
|
|
})
|
|
? allowBridge("Allowed for bridge-created or assigned issue.")
|
|
: denyBridge("Task bridge key can only access assigned or bridge-created issues.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return denyBridge("Task bridge key cannot use this API action.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function decideSkillTestAccess(input: {
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction;
|
|
resource: AuthorizationResource;
|
|
scope: SkillTestAgentKeyScope;
|
|
}): AuthorizationDecision | null {
|
|
const denySkillTest = (explanation: string) =>
|
|
deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_scope",
|
|
explanation,
|
|
});
|
|
const allowSkillTest = (explanation: string) =>
|
|
allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_explicit_grant",
|
|
explanation,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action === "company_scope:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_triage:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "agent:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "agent:wake" ||
|
|
input.action === "project:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "project:write_workspace" ||
|
|
input.action === "runtime:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:propose" ||
|
|
input.action === "tasks:assign"
|
|
) {
|
|
return denySkillTest("Skill-test run tokens cannot use company-wide, peer-agent, project, runtime, secret, or task-create APIs.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "issue:read" || input.action === "issue:comment" || input.action === "issue:mutate") {
|
|
if (input.resource.type !== "issue") {
|
|
return denySkillTest("Skill-test issue access requires an issue resource.");
|
|
}
|
|
return input.resource.issueId === input.scope.issueId
|
|
? allowSkillTest("Allowed for the scoped skill-test issue.")
|
|
: denySkillTest("Skill-test run token can only access its own harness issue.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return denySkillTest("Skill-test run token cannot use this API action.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function assignmentTargetIsInCompany(resource: AuthorizationResource) {
|
|
if (resource.type !== "issue") return true;
|
|
if (resource.assigneeAgentId) {
|
|
const target = await loadAgent(resource.assigneeAgentId);
|
|
return Boolean(
|
|
target &&
|
|
target.companyId === resource.companyId &&
|
|
isSimpleAssignableAgentStatus(target.status),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (resource.assigneeUserId) {
|
|
return Boolean(await getActiveMembership(resource.companyId, "user", resource.assigneeUserId));
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function assignmentPolicyEffect(resource: AuthorizationResource): Promise<AssignmentPolicyEffect> {
|
|
if (resource.type !== "issue") return { kind: "none" };
|
|
|
|
const checks: Array<Promise<AssignmentPolicyEffect>> = [];
|
|
if (resource.assigneeAgentId) {
|
|
checks.push(
|
|
loadAgent(resource.assigneeAgentId).then((agent) =>
|
|
evaluateAuthorizationPolicyForAssignment(
|
|
readPolicyObject(agent?.permissions, "authorizationPolicy"),
|
|
"Target agent",
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (resource.projectId) {
|
|
checks.push(
|
|
loadProjectAuthorizationPolicy(resource.companyId, resource.projectId).then((policy) =>
|
|
evaluateAuthorizationPolicyForAssignment(policy, "Target project"),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (resource.issueId) {
|
|
checks.push(
|
|
loadIssueAuthorizationPolicy(resource.companyId, resource.issueId).then((policy) =>
|
|
evaluateAuthorizationPolicyForAssignment(policy, "Target issue"),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (resource.parentIssueId && resource.parentIssueId !== resource.issueId) {
|
|
checks.push(
|
|
loadIssueAuthorizationPolicy(resource.companyId, resource.parentIssueId).then((policy) =>
|
|
evaluateAuthorizationPolicyForAssignment(policy, "Parent issue"),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (checks.length === 0) return { kind: "none" };
|
|
|
|
const effects = await Promise.all(checks);
|
|
return (
|
|
effects.find((effect) => effect.kind === "unknown") ??
|
|
effects.find((effect) => effect.kind === "blocked") ??
|
|
effects.find((effect) => effect.kind === "restricted") ??
|
|
{ kind: "none" }
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function isManagerOf(companyId: string, managerAgentId: string, assigneeAgentId: string) {
|
|
return isAgentInSubtree(db, companyId, managerAgentId, assigneeAgentId);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function commentAuthorCanGrantIssueMention(input: {
|
|
mentionedAgentId: string;
|
|
issueAssigneeAgentId: string | null;
|
|
authorAgentId: string | null;
|
|
authorUserId: string | null;
|
|
activeAuthorUserIds: Set<string>;
|
|
}) {
|
|
if (input.authorAgentId) {
|
|
if (input.authorAgentId === input.mentionedAgentId) return false;
|
|
return input.issueAssigneeAgentId === input.authorAgentId;
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.authorUserId) {
|
|
return input.activeAuthorUserIds.has(input.authorUserId);
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function agentHasMentionGrantOnIssue(input: {
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
issueId: string;
|
|
issueAssigneeAgentId: string | null;
|
|
actorAgentId: string;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const rows = await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: issueComments.id,
|
|
body: issueComments.body,
|
|
authorAgentId: issueComments.authorAgentId,
|
|
authorUserId: issueComments.authorUserId,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issueComments)
|
|
.where(and(
|
|
eq(issueComments.companyId, input.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueComments.issueId, input.issueId),
|
|
isNull(issueComments.deletedAt),
|
|
sql`${issueComments.body} LIKE ${"%agent://" + input.actorAgentId + "%"}`,
|
|
));
|
|
|
|
const mentionRows = rows.filter((row) => extractAgentMentionIds(row.body).includes(input.actorAgentId));
|
|
const authorUserIds = [...new Set(mentionRows.flatMap((row) => row.authorUserId ? [row.authorUserId] : []))];
|
|
const activeAuthorUserIds = new Set(
|
|
authorUserIds.length === 0
|
|
? []
|
|
: await db
|
|
.select({ principalId: companyMemberships.principalId })
|
|
.from(companyMemberships)
|
|
.where(and(
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.companyId, input.companyId),
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.principalType, "user"),
|
|
eq(companyMemberships.status, "active"),
|
|
inArray(companyMemberships.principalId, authorUserIds),
|
|
))
|
|
.then((memberships) => memberships.map((membership) => membership.principalId)),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
for (const row of mentionRows) {
|
|
const authorCanGrant = commentAuthorCanGrantIssueMention({
|
|
mentionedAgentId: input.actorAgentId,
|
|
issueAssigneeAgentId: input.issueAssigneeAgentId,
|
|
authorAgentId: row.authorAgentId,
|
|
authorUserId: row.authorUserId,
|
|
activeAuthorUserIds,
|
|
});
|
|
if (authorCanGrant) {
|
|
logger.info({
|
|
actorAgentId: input.actorAgentId,
|
|
issueId: input.issueId,
|
|
companyId: input.companyId,
|
|
commentId: row.id,
|
|
grantedAction: input.action,
|
|
grant: "issue_mention_comment",
|
|
}, "authorized issue mention-scoped comment grant");
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function allowIssueMentionGrant(action: AuthorizationAction): AuthorizationDecision {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action,
|
|
reason: "allow_issue_mention_grant",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by a mention-scoped issue comment grant.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function decideBase(input: {
|
|
actor: AuthorizationActor;
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction;
|
|
resource: AuthorizationResource;
|
|
scope?: Record<string, unknown> | null;
|
|
}): Promise<AuthorizationDecision> {
|
|
const permissionKey = permissionForAction(input.action);
|
|
const companyId = companyIdForResource(input.resource);
|
|
if (input.action === "project:write_workspace" && (input.resource.type !== "issue" || !input.resource.projectId)) {
|
|
return deny({ action: input.action, reason: "deny_unsupported_action", explanation: "Workspace writes require a source project and task context." });
|
|
}
|
|
const taskAssignmentAction = input.action === "tasks:assign" || input.action === "project:write_workspace";
|
|
const requestedAssignmentPolicy = () => input.action === "project:write_workspace" && input.resource.type === "issue"
|
|
? loadProjectAuthorizationPolicy(companyId, input.resource.projectId!).then(policy => evaluateAuthorizationPolicyForAssignment(policy, "Target project"))
|
|
: assignmentPolicyEffect(input.resource);
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Shared default-open decision for issue write-influence channels.
|
|
*
|
|
* Keep visibility structurally upstream of every standard-trust write so
|
|
* future visibility scoping can be implemented in issue:read without
|
|
* recreating per-action scope checks. The responsible-user ceiling remains
|
|
* in decide(), after this base decision.
|
|
*/
|
|
async function decideVisibleIssueWrite(): Promise<AuthorizationDecision> {
|
|
let visibilityResource: AuthorizationResource = input.resource;
|
|
|
|
// New-child assignment decisions identify the issue being influenced by
|
|
// parentIssueId. Resolve that parent into the same resource shape used by
|
|
// issue:read so child-create and assign share the visibility hook.
|
|
if (
|
|
input.resource.type === "issue" &&
|
|
!input.resource.issueId &&
|
|
input.resource.parentIssueId
|
|
) {
|
|
const parent = await loadIssue(input.resource.parentIssueId);
|
|
if (!parent || parent.companyId !== companyId) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_company_boundary",
|
|
explanation: "The issue write target is not visible in this company.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
visibilityResource = {
|
|
type: "issue",
|
|
companyId: parent.companyId,
|
|
issueId: parent.id,
|
|
projectId: parent.projectId,
|
|
parentIssueId: parent.parentId,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: parent.assigneeAgentId,
|
|
assigneeUserId: parent.assigneeUserId,
|
|
originKind: parent.originKind,
|
|
originId: parent.originId,
|
|
status: parent.status,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const visibilityDecision = visibilityResource.type === "issue" && visibilityResource.issueId
|
|
? await decideBase({
|
|
actor: input.actor,
|
|
action: "issue:read",
|
|
resource: visibilityResource,
|
|
scope: input.scope,
|
|
})
|
|
: await decideBase({
|
|
actor: input.actor,
|
|
action: "company_scope:read",
|
|
resource: { type: "company", companyId },
|
|
scope: input.scope,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (!visibilityDecision.allowed) {
|
|
return {
|
|
...visibilityDecision,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
explanation: `Issue write denied because the target is not visible: ${visibilityDecision.explanation}`,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_visible_issue_write",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by the shared default-open visible-issue write rule.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function decideWithTaskAssignmentGrants(
|
|
principalType: PrincipalType,
|
|
principalId: string,
|
|
): Promise<AuthorizationDecision> {
|
|
const broadDecision = await decidePrincipalGrant({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
principalType,
|
|
principalId,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
permissionKey: "tasks:assign",
|
|
scope: input.scope,
|
|
});
|
|
if (broadDecision.allowed || broadDecision.reason === "deny_missing_membership") return broadDecision;
|
|
const scopedDecision = await decidePrincipalGrant({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
principalType,
|
|
principalId,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
permissionKey: "tasks:assign_scope",
|
|
scope: input.scope,
|
|
});
|
|
if (scopedDecision.allowed || broadDecision.reason === "deny_missing_grant") return scopedDecision;
|
|
return broadDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function decideWithAgentConfigReadGrant(
|
|
principalType: PrincipalType,
|
|
principalId: string,
|
|
): Promise<AuthorizationDecision> {
|
|
const configureDecision = await decidePrincipalGrant({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
principalType,
|
|
principalId,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
permissionKey: "agents:configure",
|
|
scope: input.scope,
|
|
});
|
|
if (configureDecision.allowed || configureDecision.reason === "deny_missing_membership") {
|
|
return configureDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const suggestDecision = await decidePrincipalGrant({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
principalType,
|
|
principalId,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
permissionKey: "agents:suggest-changes",
|
|
scope: input.scope,
|
|
});
|
|
if (suggestDecision.allowed || suggestDecision.reason === "deny_missing_grant") {
|
|
return suggestDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
return configureDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function decideWithProtectedChangeGrants(
|
|
principalType: PrincipalType,
|
|
principalId: string,
|
|
keys: { direct: PermissionKey; suggest: PermissionKey },
|
|
): Promise<AuthorizationDecision> {
|
|
const directDecision = await decidePrincipalGrant({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
principalType,
|
|
principalId,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
permissionKey: keys.direct,
|
|
scope: input.scope,
|
|
});
|
|
if (directDecision.allowed) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_direct_change",
|
|
explanation: `Allowed by direct change permission ${keys.direct}.`,
|
|
grant: directDecision.grant,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (directDecision.reason === "deny_missing_membership") return directDecision;
|
|
|
|
const suggestDecision = await decidePrincipalGrant({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
principalType,
|
|
principalId,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
permissionKey: keys.suggest,
|
|
scope: input.scope,
|
|
});
|
|
if (suggestDecision.allowed) {
|
|
if (scopeBoolean(input.scope, "consentedChange")) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_consented_change",
|
|
explanation: `Allowed by suggest permission ${keys.suggest} after accepted change consent.`,
|
|
grant: suggestDecision.grant,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_consent",
|
|
explanation: `Permission ${keys.suggest} requires accepted change consent before applying this mutation.`,
|
|
grant: suggestDecision.grant,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (suggestDecision.reason === "deny_missing_membership") return suggestDecision;
|
|
if (directDecision.reason === "deny_scope") return directDecision;
|
|
if (suggestDecision.reason === "deny_scope") return suggestDecision;
|
|
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_no_grant",
|
|
explanation: `Missing permission: ${keys.direct} or ${keys.suggest}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function denyForAssignmentPolicyIfNeeded(
|
|
policyEffect: AssignmentPolicyEffect,
|
|
): Promise<AuthorizationDecision | null> {
|
|
if (policyEffect.kind === "none" || policyEffect.kind === "restricted") return null;
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_policy_restricted",
|
|
explanation: policyEffect.explanation,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function denyRestrictedAssignmentPolicy(policyEffect: AssignmentPolicyEffect): AuthorizationDecision {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_policy_restricted",
|
|
explanation:
|
|
policyEffect.kind === "restricted"
|
|
? policyEffect.explanation
|
|
: "Restrictive authorization policy blocks simple company-wide task assignment.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.actor.type === "none") {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_unauthenticated",
|
|
explanation: "Authentication required.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "runtime:confirm_owner_stop" && input.actor.type !== "board") {
|
|
return deny({ action: input.action, reason: "deny_unsupported_action",
|
|
explanation: "Only a deployment administrator can confirm a workspace controller has stopped." });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.actor.type === "board") {
|
|
let taskAssignmentPolicyEffect: AssignmentPolicyEffect | null = null;
|
|
if (input.actor.source === "local_implicit") {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_local_board",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed because the actor is the local implicit board.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
// MCP grants always use their explicitly consented company membership,
|
|
// even when the consenting person is an instance administrator.
|
|
// A cloud_tenant actor's computed `isInstanceAdmin` flag is trusted: it
|
|
// can only be set by the attested trusted-header resolver (stack owner +
|
|
// `enableOwnerInstanceAdmin`). The `instance_user_roles` DB lookup stays
|
|
// excluded for cloud_tenant actors, so a stale or hand-inserted
|
|
// instance_admin row left behind by deployments that ran the
|
|
// pre-hardening cloud_tenant path still elevates nothing.
|
|
if (
|
|
!input.actor.ignoreInstanceAdmin && input.actor.source !== "mcp_oauth" &&
|
|
(input.actor.isInstanceAdmin ||
|
|
(input.actor.source !== "cloud_tenant" && await isInstanceAdmin(input.actor.userId)))
|
|
) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_instance_admin",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed because the actor is an instance admin.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.action === "runtime:confirm_owner_stop") {
|
|
const membership = await getActiveMembership(companyId, "user", input.actor.userId ?? "");
|
|
if (membership?.membershipRole === "owner" || membership?.membershipRole === "admin") {
|
|
return allow({ action: input.action, reason: "allow_role_default",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by the active company owner or administrator role." });
|
|
}
|
|
return deny({ action: input.action, reason: "deny_missing_grant",
|
|
explanation: "Only a company owner, company administrator, or instance administrator can confirm a workspace controller has stopped." });
|
|
}
|
|
// What instance-admin elevation used to give cloud tenant users is
|
|
// replaced by company-scoped visibility: an active membership in the
|
|
// resource company grants the same read surface a same-company agent
|
|
// gets, and non-viewer members may mutate issues inside their company.
|
|
// Cross-company access stays denied.
|
|
if (input.actor.source === "cloud_tenant" && input.actor.userId) {
|
|
const membership = await getActiveMembership(companyId, "user", input.actor.userId);
|
|
if (membership) {
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action === "agent:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "company_scope:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "issue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "project:read"
|
|
) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_company_member",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by active cloud tenant company membership.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
(
|
|
input.action === "issue:comment" ||
|
|
input.action === "issue:mutate" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_triage:manage"
|
|
) &&
|
|
membership.membershipRole !== "viewer"
|
|
) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_company_member",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by active cloud tenant company membership.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (!input.actor.userId) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_unauthenticated",
|
|
explanation: "Board user id is required.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (isConnectionManagementAction(input.action) && input.resource.type === "connection_management") {
|
|
const membership = await getActiveMembership(companyId, "user", input.actor.userId);
|
|
if (!membership || (!input.resource.readOnly && input.action !== "connections:read" && membership.membershipRole === "viewer")) {
|
|
return deny({ action: input.action, reason: "deny_missing_membership", explanation: "Connection management requires an active, eligible company membership." });
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.resource.readOnly || input.action === "connections:read") {
|
|
return allow({ action: input.action, reason: "allow_company_member", explanation: "Management metadata is visible to active company members, subject to resource visibility." });
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.resource.selfServiceUserId === input.actor.userId &&
|
|
["connections:read", "connections:configure", "connections:profiles"].includes(input.action)) {
|
|
return allow({ action: input.action, reason: "allow_self", explanation: "Allowed by personal account or connection creator authority." });
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.action === "connections:profiles" && input.resource.selfServiceAgentInstalls) {
|
|
return decidePrincipalGrant({ companyId, principalType: "user", principalId: input.actor.userId,
|
|
action: input.action, permissionKey: "agents:configure", scope: input.scope });
|
|
}
|
|
const userPermission = input.action === "connections:gateway" ? "tools:admin"
|
|
: input.action === "connections:profiles" && input.resource.operation.includes("/delegations") ? "tools:manage_connections"
|
|
: permissionKey!;
|
|
const granted = await decidePrincipalGrant({ companyId, principalType: "user", principalId: input.actor.userId,
|
|
action: input.action, permissionKey: userPermission, scope: input.scope });
|
|
// Existing human setup tests are available to connection managers. The
|
|
// acting agent still needs tools:use and normal execution policy.
|
|
if (!granted.allowed && granted.reason === "deny_missing_grant" && input.action === "connections:test") {
|
|
return decidePrincipalGrant({ companyId, principalType: "user", principalId: input.actor.userId,
|
|
action: input.action, permissionKey: "tools:manage_connections", scope: input.scope });
|
|
}
|
|
if (!granted.allowed && granted.reason === "deny_missing_grant" && input.action === "connections:profiles" &&
|
|
["owner", "admin"].includes(membership.membershipRole ?? "")) {
|
|
return decidePrincipalGrant({ companyId, principalType: "user", principalId: input.actor.userId,
|
|
action: input.action, permissionKey: "tools:admin", scope: input.scope });
|
|
}
|
|
return granted;
|
|
}
|
|
if (taskAssignmentAction) {
|
|
if (!(await assignmentTargetIsInCompany(input.resource))) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_company_boundary",
|
|
explanation: "Task assignment target agent is not active in the target company.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
const policyEffect = await requestedAssignmentPolicy();
|
|
taskAssignmentPolicyEffect = policyEffect;
|
|
const policyDeny = await denyForAssignmentPolicyIfNeeded(policyEffect);
|
|
if (policyDeny) return policyDeny;
|
|
const membership = await getActiveMembership(companyId, "user", input.actor.userId);
|
|
if (policyEffect.kind === "none" && membership && membership.membershipRole !== "viewer") {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_simple_company_member",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by simple mode company-wide task assignment default.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.action === "agent_config:read") {
|
|
return decideWithAgentConfigReadGrant("user", input.actor.userId);
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.action === "agent_config:update" || input.action === "agent_instructions:update") {
|
|
return decideWithProtectedChangeGrants("user", input.actor.userId, {
|
|
direct: "agents:configure",
|
|
suggest: "agents:suggest-changes",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.action === "skill_config:update") {
|
|
return decideWithProtectedChangeGrants("user", input.actor.userId, {
|
|
direct: "skills:create",
|
|
suggest: "skills:suggest-changes",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (!permissionKey) {
|
|
if (input.action === "issue:comment" || input.action === "issue:mutate") {
|
|
if (
|
|
input.resource.type !== "issue" ||
|
|
!input.resource.issueId ||
|
|
typeof input.resource.status !== "string" ||
|
|
input.resource.assigneeAgentId === undefined ||
|
|
input.resource.assigneeUserId === undefined
|
|
) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_unsupported_action",
|
|
explanation: `No board permission mapping exists for ${input.action}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
const membership = await getActiveMembership(companyId, "user", input.actor.userId);
|
|
if (membership && membership.membershipRole !== "viewer") {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_simple_company_member",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by standard same-company board membership issue mutation.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (membership) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_grant",
|
|
explanation: `Viewer membership does not grant ${input.action}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_membership",
|
|
explanation: `user principal ${input.actor.userId} is not an active member of company ${companyId}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action === "agent:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "agent:wake" ||
|
|
input.action === "company_scope:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_triage:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "issue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "project:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "runtime:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:propose"
|
|
) {
|
|
const membership = await getActiveMembership(companyId, "user", input.actor.userId);
|
|
// Mirroring the tasks:assign carve-out above, viewers keep the
|
|
// read-only visibility actions but not the privileged ones.
|
|
const requiresNonViewer =
|
|
input.action === "agent:wake" ||
|
|
input.action === "runtime:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_triage:manage";
|
|
if (membership && (!requiresNonViewer || membership.membershipRole !== "viewer")) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_simple_company_member",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by standard same-company board membership visibility.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (membership) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_grant",
|
|
explanation: `Viewer membership does not grant ${input.action}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_membership",
|
|
explanation: `user principal ${input.actor.userId} is not an active member of company ${companyId}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_unsupported_action",
|
|
explanation: `No board permission mapping exists for ${input.action}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (taskAssignmentAction) {
|
|
const grantDecision = await decideWithTaskAssignmentGrants("user", input.actor.userId);
|
|
if (grantDecision.allowed) return grantDecision;
|
|
const policyEffect = taskAssignmentPolicyEffect ?? await requestedAssignmentPolicy();
|
|
if (policyEffect.kind === "restricted") return denyRestrictedAssignmentPolicy(policyEffect);
|
|
return grantDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
return decidePrincipalGrant({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
principalType: "user",
|
|
principalId: input.actor.userId,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
permissionKey,
|
|
scope: input.scope,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const actorAgentId = input.actor.agentId ?? null;
|
|
if (!actorAgentId) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_unauthenticated",
|
|
explanation: "Agent authentication required.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (input.actor.companyId !== companyId) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_company_boundary",
|
|
explanation: "Agent key cannot access another company.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const actorAgent = await loadAgent(actorAgentId);
|
|
if (!actorAgent || actorAgent.companyId !== companyId) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_company_boundary",
|
|
explanation: "Actor agent was not found in the target company.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (isConnectionManagementAction(input.action) &&
|
|
(input.actor.keyScope?.kind === "skill_test" || input.actor.keyScope?.kind === "task_bridge")) {
|
|
return deny({ action: input.action, reason: "deny_scope", explanation: "Scoped test and task bridge credentials cannot administer connections." });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.actor.keyScope?.kind === "skill_test") {
|
|
const skillTestDecision = decideSkillTestAccess({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
resource: input.resource,
|
|
scope: input.actor.keyScope,
|
|
});
|
|
if (skillTestDecision) return skillTestDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.actor.keyScope?.kind === "task_bridge") {
|
|
const keyId = input.actor.keyId ?? null;
|
|
if (!keyId) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_scope",
|
|
explanation: "Task bridge key context is missing.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
const taskBridgeDecision = await decideTaskBridgeAccess({
|
|
actorAgentId,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
resource: input.resource,
|
|
scope: input.actor.keyScope,
|
|
keyId,
|
|
});
|
|
if (taskBridgeDecision) return taskBridgeDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const trustResolution = await resolveActorTrust({
|
|
actorAgent,
|
|
actor: input.actor,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
resource: input.resource,
|
|
});
|
|
const directParentReportTarget =
|
|
input.action === "issue:comment" &&
|
|
await isDirectParentReportTarget({
|
|
actor: input.actor,
|
|
actorAgentId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
resource: input.resource,
|
|
});
|
|
const lowTrustDecision = await decideLowTrustAccess({
|
|
actorAgentId,
|
|
actor: input.actor,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
resource: input.resource,
|
|
resolution: trustResolution,
|
|
directParentReportTarget,
|
|
});
|
|
if (lowTrustDecision) {
|
|
if (!lowTrustDecision.allowed) return lowTrustDecision;
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action === "agent:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "agent:wake" ||
|
|
input.action === "company_scope:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "issue:comment" ||
|
|
input.action === "issue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "project:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "runtime:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:propose"
|
|
) {
|
|
return lowTrustDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const visibleIssueWriteDecision =
|
|
trustResolution.kind === "standard" &&
|
|
(input.action === "issue:comment" || input.action === "issue:mutate")
|
|
? await decideVisibleIssueWrite()
|
|
: null;
|
|
if (visibleIssueWriteDecision && !visibleIssueWriteDecision.allowed) {
|
|
return visibleIssueWriteDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
trustResolution.kind === "standard" &&
|
|
input.action === "issue:comment" &&
|
|
directParentReportTarget
|
|
) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_direct_parent_report",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed because the target is the current run issue's direct parent under the standard trust preset.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "inbox:manage") {
|
|
if (!isSimpleAssignableAgentStatus(actorAgent.status)) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_membership",
|
|
explanation: "Actor agent is not active in the target company.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
const responsibleUserId = input.actor.onBehalfOfUserId?.trim() || null;
|
|
const explicitTargetUserId = typeof input.scope?.userId === "string"
|
|
? input.scope.userId.trim() || null
|
|
: null;
|
|
const targetUserId = explicitTargetUserId ?? responsibleUserId;
|
|
if (!targetUserId) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "inbox_target_user_unresolved",
|
|
explanation: "Inbox target user could not be resolved from the request or responsible-user context.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const targetSnapshot = await getResponsibleUserSnapshot({
|
|
actor: input.actor,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
userId: targetUserId,
|
|
});
|
|
if (!targetSnapshot.userExists || !targetSnapshot.activeMembership) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_membership",
|
|
explanation: `Inbox target user ${targetUserId} is not an active member of company ${companyId}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const policy = await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
mode: userInboxAgentPolicies.mode,
|
|
allowedAgentIds: userInboxAgentPolicies.allowedAgentIds,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(userInboxAgentPolicies)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(userInboxAgentPolicies.companyId, companyId),
|
|
eq(userInboxAgentPolicies.userId, targetUserId),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
|
|
if (targetUserId !== responsibleUserId) {
|
|
// A scoped grant remains an administrative override, including over a
|
|
// disabled user policy. Otherwise, a materialized target-user policy is
|
|
// explicit consent for agents selected in the profile control. The
|
|
// implicit default-open policy remains responsible-user-only so an
|
|
// absent row never becomes a company-wide cross-user grant.
|
|
const grant = await findGrant(companyId, "agent", actorAgentId, "inbox:manage");
|
|
if (grant && grant.scope?.responsibleUserOnly !== true &&
|
|
(await scopeAllows(db, companyId, grant.scope, { userId: targetUserId }))) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_explicit_grant",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by explicit grant inbox:manage.",
|
|
inboxPolicyMode: "grant_override",
|
|
grant: {
|
|
principalType: "agent",
|
|
principalId: actorAgentId,
|
|
permissionKey: "inbox:manage",
|
|
scope: grant.scope ?? null,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (policy?.mode === "disabled") {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "inbox_management_disabled",
|
|
explanation: `Inbox management is disabled for user ${targetUserId}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (policy?.mode === "allowlist" && !policy.allowedAgentIds.includes(actorAgentId)) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "inbox_agent_not_allowed",
|
|
explanation: `Agent ${actorAgentId} is not allowed to manage user ${targetUserId}'s inbox.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (policy?.mode === "open" || policy?.mode === "allowlist") {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_user_inbox_policy",
|
|
inboxPolicyMode: policy.mode,
|
|
explanation: policy.mode === "allowlist"
|
|
? "Allowed by the target user's inbox agent allowlist."
|
|
: "Allowed by the target user's saved open inbox policy.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (grant) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_scope",
|
|
explanation: "Permission inbox:manage does not cover the requested user.",
|
|
grant: {
|
|
principalType: "agent",
|
|
principalId: actorAgentId,
|
|
permissionKey: "inbox:manage",
|
|
scope: grant.scope ?? null,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_grant",
|
|
explanation: "Missing permission: inbox:manage.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (policy?.mode === "disabled") {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "inbox_management_disabled",
|
|
explanation: `Inbox management is disabled for user ${targetUserId}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (policy?.mode === "allowlist" && !policy.allowedAgentIds.includes(actorAgentId)) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "inbox_agent_not_allowed",
|
|
explanation: `Agent ${actorAgentId} is not allowed to manage user ${targetUserId}'s inbox.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_self",
|
|
inboxPolicyMode: policy?.mode ?? "open",
|
|
explanation: policy?.mode === "allowlist"
|
|
? "Allowed by the responsible user's inbox agent allowlist."
|
|
: "Allowed by the responsible user's default-open inbox policy.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action === "agent:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "company_scope:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "decision_queue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "issue:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "project:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "runtime:manage" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:read" ||
|
|
input.action === "secrets:propose"
|
|
) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_company_agent",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by standard same-company agent visibility.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "decision_queue:manage" || input.action === "decision_triage:manage") {
|
|
if (!isSimpleAssignableAgentStatus(actorAgent.status)) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_membership",
|
|
explanation: "Actor agent is not active in the target company.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_company_agent",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed for an active standard-scope company agent.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "agent:wake" && input.resource.type === "agent" && input.resource.agentId === actorAgentId) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_self",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed because the actor is waking itself.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (taskAssignmentAction) {
|
|
if (!isSimpleAssignableAgentStatus(actorAgent.status)) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_membership",
|
|
explanation: "Actor agent is not active for simple mode task assignment.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (!(await assignmentTargetIsInCompany(input.resource))) {
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_company_boundary",
|
|
explanation: "Task assignment target agent is not active in the target company.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
const policyEffect = await requestedAssignmentPolicy();
|
|
const policyDeny = await denyForAssignmentPolicyIfNeeded(policyEffect);
|
|
if (policyDeny) return policyDeny;
|
|
if (policyEffect.kind === "restricted") {
|
|
const grantDecision = await decideWithTaskAssignmentGrants("agent", actorAgentId);
|
|
if (grantDecision.allowed) return grantDecision;
|
|
return denyRestrictedAssignmentPolicy(policyEffect);
|
|
}
|
|
if (trustResolution.kind === "standard") return decideVisibleIssueWrite();
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_simple_company_member",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by the existing bounded task assignment rule.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "issue:comment" || input.action === "issue:mutate") {
|
|
const resource = input.resource.type === "issue" ? input.resource : null;
|
|
if (resource?.assigneeAgentId === actorAgentId) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_self",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed because the actor owns the assigned issue.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (!resource?.assigneeAgentId) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_company_agent",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed because the issue has no agent assignee.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action === "issue:comment" &&
|
|
resource?.issueId &&
|
|
await agentHasMentionGrantOnIssue({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
issueId: resource.issueId,
|
|
issueAssigneeAgentId: resource.assigneeAgentId ?? null,
|
|
actorAgentId,
|
|
})
|
|
) {
|
|
return allowIssueMentionGrant(input.action);
|
|
}
|
|
if (visibleIssueWriteDecision) return visibleIssueWriteDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action === "agent_config:update" &&
|
|
input.resource.type === "agent" &&
|
|
input.resource.agentId === actorAgentId &&
|
|
!scopeBoolean(input.scope, "requiresChangeGrant")
|
|
) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_self",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed because the actor is updating its own agent configuration.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "agent_config:read") {
|
|
if (input.resource.type === "agent" && input.resource.agentId === actorAgentId) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_self",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed because the actor is reading its own agent configuration.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
return decideWithAgentConfigReadGrant("agent", actorAgentId);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "agent_instructions:update") {
|
|
if (!isSimpleAssignableAgentStatus(actorAgent.status) || !input.actor.onBehalfOfUserId) {
|
|
return deny({ action: input.action, reason: "deny_missing_membership", explanation: "Instruction edits require an active agent and a responsible user." });
|
|
}
|
|
// Explicit configure/suggest restrictions still govern content changes.
|
|
// Only self edits may fall back to the responsible user's target access.
|
|
const restricted = await decideWithProtectedChangeGrants("agent", actorAgentId, {
|
|
direct: "agents:configure", suggest: "agents:suggest-changes",
|
|
});
|
|
if (restricted.reason !== "deny_no_grant" || input.resource.type !== "agent" || input.resource.agentId !== actorAgentId) return restricted;
|
|
return allow({ action: input.action, reason: "allow_self", explanation: "Own instruction content edit, subject to the responsible user's target edit access." });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "agent_config:update") {
|
|
return decideWithProtectedChangeGrants("agent", actorAgentId, {
|
|
direct: "agents:configure",
|
|
suggest: "agents:suggest-changes",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "skill_config:update") {
|
|
return decideWithProtectedChangeGrants("agent", actorAgentId, {
|
|
direct: "skills:create",
|
|
suggest: "skills:suggest-changes",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (permissionKey) {
|
|
const grantDecision = await decidePrincipalGrant({
|
|
companyId,
|
|
principalType: "agent",
|
|
principalId: actorAgentId,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
permissionKey,
|
|
scope: input.scope,
|
|
});
|
|
if (grantDecision.allowed) return grantDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (input.action === "agents:create" && canCreateAgentsLegacy(actorAgent)) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_legacy_agent_creator",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by legacy agent creator authority.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Active-checkout management deliberately does not ride on
|
|
// canCreateAgents: that flag is default-on for standard-trust agents, and
|
|
// coupling would let any peer write over another agent's checked-out
|
|
// issue. CEOs, explicit grants, and the manager chain remain the paths.
|
|
if (input.action === "tasks:manage_active_checkouts" && actorAgent.role === "ceo") {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_legacy_agent_creator",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed by legacy agent creator authority.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action === "tasks:manage_active_checkouts" &&
|
|
input.resource.type === "issue" &&
|
|
input.resource.assigneeAgentId &&
|
|
await isManagerOf(companyId, actorAgentId, input.resource.assigneeAgentId)
|
|
) {
|
|
return allow({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "allow_manager_chain",
|
|
explanation: "Allowed because the actor manages the issue assignee in the reporting chain.",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_grant",
|
|
explanation: permissionKey
|
|
? `Missing permission: ${permissionKey}.`
|
|
: `No agent permission mapping exists for ${input.action}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function applyResponsibleUserIntersection(
|
|
input: {
|
|
actor: AuthorizationActor;
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction;
|
|
resource: AuthorizationResource;
|
|
scope?: Record<string, unknown> | null;
|
|
},
|
|
agentDecision: AuthorizationDecision,
|
|
): Promise<AuthorizationDecision> {
|
|
const responsibleUserId = input.actor.onBehalfOfUserId?.trim();
|
|
if (input.actor.type === "agent" && isConnectionManagementAction(input.action) && !responsibleUserId) {
|
|
return deny({ action: input.action, reason: "deny_missing_membership", code: "RESPONSIBLE_USER_UNAVAILABLE",
|
|
explanation: "Connection management requires an authenticated responsible user." });
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
input.actor.type !== "agent" ||
|
|
input.action === "inbox:manage" ||
|
|
!responsibleUserId ||
|
|
!agentDecision.allowed
|
|
) {
|
|
return agentDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const companyId = companyIdForResource(input.resource);
|
|
const snapshot = isConnectionManagementAction(input.action)
|
|
? await loadResponsibleUserSnapshot(companyId, responsibleUserId)
|
|
: await getResponsibleUserSnapshot({ actor: input.actor, companyId, userId: responsibleUserId });
|
|
const denyCode: AuthorizationDecision["code"] =
|
|
snapshot.userExists && snapshot.activeMembership
|
|
? "RESPONSIBLE_USER_UNAUTHORIZED"
|
|
: "RESPONSIBLE_USER_UNAVAILABLE";
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
activeResponsibleUserCanAuthorizeAgentGrantedSkillChange(
|
|
input.action,
|
|
snapshot.activeMembership,
|
|
agentDecision,
|
|
input.actor.agentId,
|
|
)
|
|
) {
|
|
// Skill mutations are governed by the agent's explicit skill-change
|
|
// grant. The responsible-user intersection still requires an active
|
|
// non-viewer user, but does not require duplicating that grant on the
|
|
// responsible user's board account for standard heartbeat JWTs.
|
|
return agentDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const userDecision = snapshot.userExists && snapshot.activeMembership
|
|
? await decideBase({
|
|
...input,
|
|
actor: {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: responsibleUserId,
|
|
companyIds: [companyId],
|
|
memberships: [snapshot.activeMembership],
|
|
isInstanceAdmin: false,
|
|
ignoreInstanceAdmin: true,
|
|
source: "session",
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
: deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_membership",
|
|
explanation: `Responsible user ${responsibleUserId} is unavailable for company ${companyId}.`,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
!userDecision.allowed &&
|
|
userDecision.reason === "deny_unsupported_action" &&
|
|
activeResponsibleUserCanAuthorizeIssueAction(input.action, snapshot.activeMembership)
|
|
) {
|
|
return agentDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (userDecision.allowed) return agentDecision;
|
|
|
|
const denied = deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: userDecision.reason,
|
|
code: denyCode,
|
|
explanation:
|
|
denyCode === "RESPONSIBLE_USER_UNAVAILABLE"
|
|
? `Responsible user ${responsibleUserId} is unavailable for company ${companyId}.`
|
|
: `Responsible user ${responsibleUserId} is not authorized for ${input.action}: ${userDecision.explanation}`,
|
|
grant: userDecision.grant,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
logger.warn({
|
|
authzMode: responsibleUserAuthzShadowMode() ? "shadow" : "enforce",
|
|
code: denied.code,
|
|
reason: userDecision.reason,
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
resourceType: input.resource.type,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
actorAgentId: input.actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
responsibleUserId,
|
|
}, "responsible-user authorization intersection denied");
|
|
|
|
return input.action !== "agent_instructions:update" && !isConnectionManagementAction(input.action) && responsibleUserAuthzShadowMode() ? agentDecision : denied;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function applyAuthorizingUserIntersection(
|
|
input: {
|
|
actor: AuthorizationActor;
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction;
|
|
resource: AuthorizationResource;
|
|
scope?: Record<string, unknown> | null;
|
|
},
|
|
agentDecision: AuthorizationDecision,
|
|
): Promise<AuthorizationDecision> {
|
|
const authorizingUserId = input.actor.authorizingUserId?.trim();
|
|
if (input.actor.type !== "agent" || !authorizingUserId || !agentDecision.allowed) return agentDecision;
|
|
|
|
const companyId = companyIdForResource(input.resource);
|
|
// External authority always uses current membership, without the request's
|
|
// responsible-user memo or rollout exceptions for agent-owned grants.
|
|
const snapshot = await loadResponsibleUserSnapshot(companyId, authorizingUserId);
|
|
const userDecision = snapshot.userExists && snapshot.activeMembership
|
|
? await decideBase({
|
|
...input,
|
|
actor: { type: "board", userId: authorizingUserId, ignoreInstanceAdmin: true, source: "session" },
|
|
})
|
|
: deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_missing_membership",
|
|
explanation: "The authorizing user is not an active company member.",
|
|
});
|
|
if (userDecision.allowed) return agentDecision;
|
|
|
|
return deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: userDecision.reason,
|
|
explanation: `Authorizing user is not authorized for ${input.action}: ${userDecision.explanation}`,
|
|
grant: userDecision.grant,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function decide(input: {
|
|
actor: AuthorizationActor;
|
|
action: AuthorizationAction;
|
|
resource: AuthorizationResource;
|
|
scope?: Record<string, unknown> | null;
|
|
}): Promise<AuthorizationDecision> {
|
|
const agentDecision = await measureWorkspaceAuthorization("authorization.base", () => decideBase(input));
|
|
const responsibleDecision = await measureWorkspaceAuthorization("authorization.responsible_user", () => applyResponsibleUserIntersection(input, agentDecision));
|
|
const intersectedDecision = await measureWorkspaceAuthorization("authorization.authorizing_user", () => applyAuthorizingUserIntersection(input, responsibleDecision));
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action === "project:read"
|
|
&& input.resource.type === "project"
|
|
&& input.resource.projectId
|
|
&& intersectedDecision.allowed
|
|
&& intersectedDecision.reason !== "allow_instance_admin"
|
|
&& intersectedDecision.reason !== "allow_local_board"
|
|
&& (input.actor.authorizingUserId || issuePrivacyMode() !== "off")
|
|
) {
|
|
const resource = input.resource;
|
|
const privacyDecision = await measureWorkspaceAuthorization("authorization.project_privacy", async () => {
|
|
const retainedProject = readSnapshot?.projects.get(resource.projectId!);
|
|
const project = retainedProject?.companyId === resource.companyId ? retainedProject : await db
|
|
.select({ id: projects.id, companyId: projects.companyId, visibility: projects.visibility })
|
|
.from(projects)
|
|
.where(and(eq(projects.id, resource.projectId!), eq(projects.companyId, resource.companyId)))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (project && !(retainedProject?.companyId === resource.companyId
|
|
? retainedProject.readable : await canActorReadProjectPrivacy(db, input.actor, project))) {
|
|
const denied = deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_project_private",
|
|
explanation: "Project is private and the actor is not an access member.",
|
|
});
|
|
logger.warn({
|
|
authzMode: issuePrivacyMode(),
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
companyId: project.companyId,
|
|
projectId: project.id,
|
|
actorType: input.actor.type,
|
|
actorUserId: input.actor.type === "board" ? input.actor.userId ?? null : null,
|
|
actorAgentId: input.actor.type === "agent" ? input.actor.agentId ?? null : null,
|
|
reason: denied.reason,
|
|
}, "project privacy would deny read");
|
|
return !input.actor.authorizingUserId && issuePrivacyMode() === "shadow" ? intersectedDecision : denied;
|
|
}
|
|
return null;
|
|
});
|
|
if (privacyDecision) return privacyDecision;
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
input.action !== "issue:read"
|
|
|| input.resource.type !== "issue"
|
|
|| !input.resource.issueId
|
|
|| !intersectedDecision.allowed
|
|
|| intersectedDecision.reason === "allow_instance_admin"
|
|
|| intersectedDecision.reason === "allow_local_board"
|
|
|| (!input.actor.authorizingUserId && issuePrivacyMode() === "off")
|
|
) return intersectedDecision;
|
|
|
|
const resource = input.resource;
|
|
return measureWorkspaceAuthorization("authorization.task_privacy", async () => {
|
|
const retainedIssue = readSnapshot?.issues.get(resource.issueId!);
|
|
const issue = retainedIssue?.companyId === resource.companyId ? retainedIssue : await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: issues.id,
|
|
companyId: issues.companyId,
|
|
visibility: issues.visibility,
|
|
privacyRootIssueId: issues.privacyRootIssueId,
|
|
responsibleUserId: issues.responsibleUserId,
|
|
createdByUserId: issues.createdByUserId,
|
|
assigneeUserId: issues.assigneeUserId,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: issues.assigneeAgentId,
|
|
projectId: issues.projectId,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(and(eq(issues.id, resource.issueId!), eq(issues.companyId, resource.companyId)))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (!issue || (retainedIssue?.companyId === resource.companyId
|
|
? retainedIssue.readable : await canActorReadIssuePrivacy(db, input.actor, issue))) return intersectedDecision;
|
|
|
|
const denied = deny({
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
reason: "deny_issue_private",
|
|
explanation: "Issue is private and the actor is not an implicit principal or active grantee.",
|
|
});
|
|
logger.warn({
|
|
authzMode: issuePrivacyMode(),
|
|
action: input.action,
|
|
companyId: issue.companyId,
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
privacyRootIssueId: issue.privacyRootIssueId,
|
|
actorType: input.actor.type,
|
|
actorUserId: input.actor.type === "board" ? input.actor.userId ?? null : null,
|
|
actorAgentId: input.actor.type === "agent" ? input.actor.agentId ?? null : null,
|
|
reason: denied.reason,
|
|
}, "issue privacy would deny read");
|
|
return !input.actor.authorizingUserId && issuePrivacyMode() === "shadow" ? intersectedDecision : denied;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A candidate filter only: project policies and responsible-user grants are
|
|
// still evaluated by decide(). Project policies can contribute an additional
|
|
// root/project scope, so the query must also retain projects with such policy.
|
|
async function projectDiscoveryCandidateIds(actor: AuthorizationActor, companyId: string): Promise<string[] | null> {
|
|
if (actor.type !== "agent" || !actor.agentId || actor.keyScope) return null;
|
|
const agent = await loadAgent(actor.agentId);
|
|
if (!agent || agent.companyId !== companyId) return [];
|
|
const run = await loadRunPolicy(actor.runId, companyId, agent.id);
|
|
const resolution = resolveCoreTrustPreset({ companyId, agent, run });
|
|
// A project can supply a missing boundary; never prefilter that case.
|
|
if (resolution.kind !== "low_trust_review") return null;
|
|
const ids = new Set(resolution.boundary.projectIds ?? []);
|
|
if (resolution.boundary.rootIssueId) {
|
|
const root = await loadIssue(resolution.boundary.rootIssueId);
|
|
if (root?.companyId === companyId && root.projectId) ids.add(root.projectId);
|
|
}
|
|
return [...ids];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
decide,
|
|
decideReads,
|
|
decideReadsForActors,
|
|
projectDiscoveryCandidateIds,
|
|
decidePrincipalGrant,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Protect disclosure of workspace records and their task-derived app metadata.
|
|
* Filesystem execution and task-bound file roots use current task access instead. */
|
|
export async function executionWorkspaceReadSqlCondition(db: Db | DbTransaction, actor: AuthorizationActor): Promise<SQL<boolean>> {
|
|
const issueCondition = await issueReadSqlCondition(db, actor);
|
|
const projectCondition = await projectReadSqlCondition(db, actor);
|
|
return sql<boolean>`(
|
|
(${executionWorkspaces.projectId} is null or exists (
|
|
select 1 from ${projects} where ${projects.id} = ${executionWorkspaces.projectId}
|
|
and ${projects.companyId} = ${executionWorkspaces.companyId} and ${projectCondition}))
|
|
and not exists (select 1 from jsonb_object_keys(coalesce(${executionWorkspaces.metadata}->'_issuePrivacySources', '{}'::jsonb)) source(id)
|
|
where not exists (select 1 from ${issues} where ${issues.id} = ${canonicalExecutionUuid(sql`source.id`)}
|
|
and ${issues.companyId} = ${executionWorkspaces.companyId} and ${issueCondition}))
|
|
and not exists (select 1 from ${issues}
|
|
where ${issues.companyId} = ${executionWorkspaces.companyId}
|
|
and (${issues.executionWorkspaceId} = ${executionWorkspaces.id} or ${issues.id} = ${executionWorkspaces.sourceIssueId})
|
|
and not ${issueCondition})
|
|
)`;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** An approval may contain task-derived payload; every linked task must be readable. */
|
|
export async function approvalReadSqlCondition(db: Db | DbTransaction, actor: AuthorizationActor): Promise<SQL<boolean>> {
|
|
const readable = await issueReadSqlCondition(db, actor);
|
|
return sql<boolean>`not exists (
|
|
select 1 from (values (${approvals.payload}->>'issueId'), (${approvals.payload}->>'sourceIssueId')) claimed(id)
|
|
where claimed.id is not null and not exists (
|
|
select 1 from ${issues} where ${issues.id}::text = claimed.id and ${issues.companyId} = ${approvals.companyId})
|
|
) and not exists (
|
|
select 1 from ${issues} where ${issues.companyId} = ${approvals.companyId}
|
|
and (${issues.id}::text = ${approvals.payload}->>'issueId'
|
|
or ${issues.id}::text = ${approvals.payload}->>'sourceIssueId'
|
|
or exists (select 1 from ${issueApprovals} ia where ia.approval_id = ${approvals.id}
|
|
and ia.company_id = ${approvals.companyId} and ia.issue_id = ${issues.id}))
|
|
and not (${readable})
|
|
)`;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export async function canActorReadApproval(db: Db | DbTransaction, actor: AuthorizationActor, approvalId: string) {
|
|
return db.select({ id: approvals.id }).from(approvals)
|
|
.where(and(eq(approvals.id, approvalId), await approvalReadSqlCondition(db, actor)))
|
|
.limit(1).then(rows => rows.length > 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export async function canActorReadExecutionWorkspace(db: Db, actor: AuthorizationActor, id: string) {
|
|
return db.select({ id: executionWorkspaces.id }).from(executionWorkspaces)
|
|
.where(and(eq(executionWorkspaces.id, id), await executionWorkspaceReadSqlCondition(db, actor)))
|
|
.limit(1).then(rows => rows.length > 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/** Recheck the external audience immediately before publishing task-derived content. */
|
|
export async function canPublishIssueToChatAudience(
|
|
tx: Db | DbTransaction,
|
|
publication: { issueId: string; companyId: string; conversationId: string; endpointId: string },
|
|
): Promise<boolean> {
|
|
const [privacyIssue] = await tx.select().from(issues)
|
|
.where(and(eq(issues.id, publication.issueId), eq(issues.companyId, publication.companyId)));
|
|
if (!privacyIssue) return false;
|
|
if (!(await canActorReadIssuePrivacy(tx, { type: "none" }, privacyIssue))) {
|
|
const [conversation] = await tx.select().from(chatConversations).where(and(
|
|
eq(chatConversations.id, publication.conversationId), eq(chatConversations.companyId, publication.companyId),
|
|
eq(chatConversations.endpointId, publication.endpointId)));
|
|
// Shared channels have no bounded, authenticated recipient set. Private
|
|
// output may leave only through a DM whose known recipients still qualify.
|
|
if (!conversation?.isDirectMessage) return false;
|
|
const recipients = await tx.selectDistinct({ principalId: chatDeliveries.principalId }).from(chatDeliveries)
|
|
.where(and(eq(chatDeliveries.conversationId, conversation.id), eq(chatDeliveries.companyId, publication.companyId),
|
|
inArray(chatDeliveries.eventKind, ["message", "mention"])));
|
|
if (!recipients.length || recipients.some(recipient => !recipient.principalId)) return false;
|
|
for (const recipient of recipients) {
|
|
const [link] = await tx.select().from(chatIdentityLinks).where(and(
|
|
eq(chatIdentityLinks.companyId, publication.companyId), eq(chatIdentityLinks.endpointId, publication.endpointId),
|
|
eq(chatIdentityLinks.principalId, recipient.principalId!), eq(chatIdentityLinks.status, "linked"), isNull(chatIdentityLinks.revokedAt)));
|
|
if (!link?.paperclipUserId) return false;
|
|
const allowed = await authorizationService(tx).decide({ actor: { type: "board", userId: link.paperclipUserId, source: "session", ignoreInstanceAdmin: true },
|
|
action: "issue:read", resource: { type: "issue", companyId: publication.companyId, issueId: publication.issueId } });
|
|
if (!allowed.allowed) return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|