mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-09 14:52:16 +02:00
Devin Foley
599ad7016c
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The release workflow publishes every public package to npm and polls each version's registry visibility before continuing > - #11834 raised the poll budget from 60 seconds to 5 minutes after npm CDN propagation lag failed four canary runs > - The very next canary run missed by ten seconds: `adapter-opencode-local@2026.821.0-canary.2` was accepted at 07:02:27 UTC and became visible at 07:07:40, just past the final poll > - This pull request doubles the per-package budget to 10 minutes > - The benefit is a release train that survives the one consistently slow package; the 90-minute publish job timeout from #11834 already absorbs it ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Follow-up to #11834. Evidence in the `Release` run for `16149a75f`: every package's publish became visible within seconds except `adapter-opencode-local`, which has lagged 3-5+ minutes on all of today's runs and exceeded the 5-minute budget by ten seconds on the latest. ## What Changed - `NPM_PUBLISH_VERIFY_ATTEMPTS` 30 → 60 (with `NPM_PUBLISH_VERIFY_DELAY_SECONDS: "10"`, a 10-minute per-package budget), plus the comment documenting the observed near-miss. ## Verification - Same env-override plumbing verified in #11834; only the numeric budget changes. The next master push (this merge) exercises the canary path. ## Risks - Low risk: a genuinely failed publish reports in up to 10 minutes; healthy publishes exit the poll on first visibility. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic, `claude-fable-5`) with extended thinking and agentic tool use via the Claude Code CLI. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (not applicable: numeric workflow env tuning) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (workflow comment updated) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge