mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-28 04:02:18 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Questions and review decisions must work in the conversation where a task started. > - Slack omitted question context and did not publish several review kinds. > - Some answers saved in Paperclip also lost their authorized continuation or their final Slack reply. > - A settled card and a successful run did not prove that the user received the result. > - This pull request preserves complete questions and follows the existing answer and delivery receipts through continuation. > - Users can read the request, submit an authorized decision, and receive the resumed task's result in the same conversation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17045 and #17218. **What happened?** Slack question cards could omit instructions and editable starting text. Checkbox reviews, item verdicts, task suggestions, and connection requests had no publication path. Complex question answers submitted in Paperclip could fail continuation authorization. Several review continuations completed without delivering their result to Slack. **Expected behavior** Show the actual question and context. Use native Slack controls when they preserve the form contract. Otherwise provide an explicit Paperclip review link. Persist one authorized response, resume through the existing delivery path, settle the card, and deliver the useful result to its originating conversation. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a task in Slack and ask a text or choice question with instructions and help text. 2. Submit native text and choice responses, then submit a complex form through Paperclip. 3. Accept a checklist, submit item decisions, select suggested tasks, or decline a connection request. 4. Inspect the saved answer, continuation run, original Slack card, and final Slack reply independently. ## What Changed - Preserve full prompts, context, descriptions, recommendations, help, and editable starting text. Use direct buttons for short choices, inline searchable selects for longer lists, and native checkboxes with explicit submission for multiple choices. - Add native custom-answer and validated-text modals, ordinary confirmation buttons, checklist decisions, per-item verdicts with reasons, suggested-task creation/dismissal, and connection decline. Keep governed approvals, permission grants, and forms that cannot be represented faithfully in the full Paperclip review surface. - Keep Slack-specific canonical-validation feedback in its owning platform module. Shared callbacks delegate without interpreting provider presentation. - Reuse the existing canonical interaction transactions, callback receipts, publication queue, and continuation delivery. Share ordinary confirmation handling across Telegram and Slack. Recheck current authorization and commit response receipts atomically. - Settle cards with the saved answer and remove stale controls. Ignore passive Slack link callbacks so opening a task does not display a false answer error. - Validate exact multi-select receipt mappings during native continuation. Recover automation-origin connection replies from their published prompt after validating the durable connection receipt. - Keep oversized multi-select handoffs free of unused native tokens, and retain the complete Paperclip form for 101–128 choices plus Other. Make the original-conversation audience explicit before submitting a Slack modal. - Add rollback, provider serialization, callback, continuation, and negative authorization regressions. Update the connector playbook and feature/access maps. No React or application UI changes are included. - Add a durable Q01–Q11 qualification index and provider coverage matrix. Require distinct functional, good-experience, and best-available-control assessments; real unanswered/answering/settled evidence; saved results, continuation and navigation proof; and retained failures. Mark other providers unaudited rather than assuming Slack parity. ## Verification Candidate: `e0017d446b1016a38d65382366cd1408cce33039`. The eleven-core-format live Slack gallery is pinned to `c3d458b2a06b660448940fd8cf33c5906f0058d5`; subsequent boundary fixes and the sharing notice have automated verification, not new live screenshots. - Real Slack UI testing covered all 11 formats: text, closed choice, long single select, multiple choices, choices with a custom answer, pattern-validated text, confirmation, checklist, item verdicts, suggested tasks, and connection requests. Each has unanswered/answering/answered screenshots as applicable, an inspected saved result, one continuation, and an individual experience review in the local HTML gallery. - The dedicated private QA app/channel used signed callbacks to the local candidate. A separately approved password-protected, read-only preview proved connection-review, suggested-task review, and created-task navigation. Anonymous access, writes, and credential routes were denied. No OAuth grant was attempted. - Real testing exposed and repaired a multi-select continuation failure and a misleading error on link-button clicks. Failed attempts remain in the evidence. The final navigation replay opened the exact pending connection request and declined it in Slack without granting access. Suggested-task creation produced the selected child with the correct parent and description. - Final review-fix verification: **32 form tests**, **28 provider/form-rendering tests**, **30 publication tests**, and **171 native continuation/authorization tests** passed. Earlier **3 atomic-resolution rollback**, **9 targeted callback/publication/Telegram**, and **28 review-continuation** cases passed. The final Slack/Teams modal subset also passed. The automation-origin connection cases, 101/128 custom-choice cases, and oversized multi-select continuation reproduced before their fixes and passed afterward; failing logs remain retained. These counts describe relevant runs, not a reliability percentage. - CI on `b5885b85fd` exposed a test fixture that assumed every Slack modal block was an input; the new sharing notice correctly renders a non-input block. The fixture now selects input blocks safely. The exact signed-modal correction/one-continuation test passed locally, together with 14 Slack form/modal tests. The failing CI log and its specific cause remain recorded. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. Server typechecking was repeated after the final source changes. Map and module-boundary checks and `git diff --check` passed. - The full `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after repeated embedded PostgreSQL semaphore exhaustion on this host. Its 1,395-test chat suite found two stale native-control assertions; both were corrected and re-tested in a focused run. Focused database suites used separate disposable databases on existing local PostgreSQL. The full suite is not claimed green; new-head CI must complete before merge. - Final-head CI passed on `e0017d446b1016a38d65382366cd1408cce33039`: all test/build jobs and required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e` gates are green ([run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40115430194)). Greptile and Ponytail both reviewed this exact head at 5/5, the security scan passed, and all review threads are resolved. - All three QA app callbacks were restored to staging. Both temporary tunnels and local proxies were closed. The local endpoint was archived and its local credential copies removed. The candidate app was stopped. Limits: provider execution used a deterministic Claude protocol fixture, not an LLM. This is local real-provider UX proof, not deployed staging or broader Codie/Claude qualification. The public preview intentionally blocked ancillary artifact routes, so its destination pages could show a partial-history warning. The complete permission-grant flow and every oversized/mixed-form branch were not driven manually. Earlier fixture, test, and provider failures remain recorded. ## Risks - New reply routes require durable origin proof. Incorrect receipt matching could lose a reply or route it incorrectly. Tests cover missing, forged, mismatched, and revoked authority. - Governed forms keep their Paperclip resolution checks. This change does not grant new approval authority to Slack. - Existing completed review results can become deliverable through the repaired publication path without another provider run. - No schema, lockfile, workflow, public task-status model, or runtime-instruction change is included. This branch is not deployed. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with code execution and tool use. The exact backend model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run focused tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green on the new head - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups on the new head - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
5349 lines
185 KiB
TypeScript
5349 lines
185 KiB
TypeScript
import { normalizeEscapedLineBreaks } from "@paperclipai/shared/validators/text";
|
|
import { notifyDeliveryWork, DELIVERY_QUEUES } from "./delivery-work-notifications.js";
|
|
import { historicalQuestionCondition } from "./issue-question-context.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
currentContinuationOrigins,
|
|
deliveredContinuationCommentIds,
|
|
} from "./execution-continuation.js";
|
|
import { parseQuestionInteractionAnswers } from "./question-interaction-answers.js";
|
|
import { isUniqueViolation } from "../db-errors.js";
|
|
import { assertAgentRunWriteAllowed } from "../agent-run-cancellation.js";
|
|
import { connectionIntentDeliveries } from "@paperclipai/db";
|
|
import { isDeepStrictEqual } from "node:util";
|
|
import {
|
|
and,
|
|
asc,
|
|
desc,
|
|
eq,
|
|
gte,
|
|
inArray,
|
|
isNotNull,
|
|
isNull,
|
|
ne,
|
|
or,
|
|
sql,
|
|
} from "drizzle-orm";
|
|
import type { Db } from "@paperclipai/db";
|
|
import {
|
|
agents,
|
|
chatVoiceSessions,
|
|
authUsers,
|
|
companySecretProposals,
|
|
companies,
|
|
documents,
|
|
heartbeatRuns,
|
|
runIdentityContexts,
|
|
issueComments,
|
|
issueDocuments,
|
|
issueQuestionResponseDeliveries,
|
|
issueThreadInteractions,
|
|
issues,
|
|
toolActionRequests,
|
|
toolOauthStates,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/db";
|
|
import {
|
|
trackInteractionCreated,
|
|
trackInteractionResolved,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/shared/telemetry";
|
|
import type {
|
|
AcceptIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
AskUserQuestionsAnswer,
|
|
AskUserQuestionsInteraction,
|
|
CancelIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
ConnectionIntentInteraction,
|
|
CreateIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
CreateIssueThreadInteractionInput,
|
|
InteractionResolverGovernance,
|
|
IssueReviewPolicy,
|
|
IssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy,
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionEffectiveResolverPolicySource,
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionKind,
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy,
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicyProvenance,
|
|
RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction,
|
|
RequestConfirmationInteraction,
|
|
RequestConfirmationTarget,
|
|
RequestItemVerdictsInteraction,
|
|
RequestItemVerdictsResult,
|
|
RequestItemVerdictsResultItem,
|
|
RejectIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
SkipIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
RespondIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
SuggestTasksInteraction,
|
|
SuggestTasksResultCreatedTask,
|
|
SubmitIssueThreadInteractionVerdicts,
|
|
WithdrawIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import {
|
|
acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
askUserQuestionsPayloadSchema,
|
|
askUserQuestionsResultSchema,
|
|
cancelIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
connectionIntentPayloadSchema,
|
|
connectionIntentResultSchema,
|
|
createIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
legacyIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicyAlias,
|
|
normalizeIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy,
|
|
rejectIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
requestCheckboxConfirmationPayloadSchema,
|
|
requestCheckboxConfirmationResultSchema,
|
|
requestConfirmationPayloadSchema,
|
|
requestConfirmationResultSchema,
|
|
requestItemVerdictsPayloadSchema,
|
|
requestItemVerdictsResultSchema,
|
|
skipIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
suggestTasksPayloadSchema,
|
|
suggestTasksResultSchema,
|
|
submitIssueThreadInteractionVerdictsSchema,
|
|
withdrawIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/shared";
|
|
import { z } from "zod";
|
|
import { conflict, forbidden, notFound, unprocessable } from "../errors.js";
|
|
import { getTelemetryClient } from "../telemetry.js";
|
|
import { authorizationService } from "./authorization.js";
|
|
import { isCloudManagedInstance } from "./cloud-instance.js";
|
|
import { resolveDeploymentMode } from "../config-file.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
logActivity,
|
|
publishActivity,
|
|
type ActivityPublication,
|
|
} from "./activity-log.js";
|
|
import { evaluateAgentInvokabilityFromDb } from "./agent-invokability.js";
|
|
import { getNativeReviewAssignment } from "./native-runtime/native-review-participant.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
assertIssueReviewVerdictActorAllowed,
|
|
isIssueReviewVerdictInteraction,
|
|
} from "./issue-review-policy.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
issueService,
|
|
ensureAssignmentIssueAccessGrant,
|
|
readAcceptedPlanConfirmationTarget,
|
|
runWorkspaceIsFinalized,
|
|
} from "./issues.js";
|
|
import { questionResponseDeliveryValues } from "./question-response-delivery.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
cancelPendingIssueInteractionChatPublications,
|
|
enqueueIssueInteractionChatPublications,
|
|
enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications,
|
|
} from "./chat-interaction-publications.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
assertIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience,
|
|
canonicalizeStoredResolverPolicy,
|
|
issueThreadInteractionResolutionError,
|
|
type IssueThreadInteractionResolverRestriction,
|
|
} from "./issue-thread-interaction-resolution.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
createPullRequestMergeStateResolver,
|
|
extractGitHubPullRequestReferences,
|
|
setBoundedPullRequestCacheEntry,
|
|
type GitHubPullRequestReference,
|
|
type PullRequestMergeState,
|
|
} from "./github-pull-request-merge.js";
|
|
|
|
export { extractGitHubPullRequestReferences } from "./github-pull-request-merge.js";
|
|
export type { GitHubPullRequestReference } from "./github-pull-request-merge.js";
|
|
|
|
type InteractionActor = {
|
|
identityContextId?: string | null;
|
|
agentId?: string | null;
|
|
runId?: string | null;
|
|
userId?: string | null;
|
|
systemId?: string | null;
|
|
resolverPolicyRestriction?:
|
|
| IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy
|
|
| IssueThreadInteractionResolverRestriction
|
|
| null;
|
|
suggestedTaskEffectsAuthorized?: boolean;
|
|
resolutionDetails?: Record<string, unknown>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
async function assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx: Db, issue: { id: string; companyId: string }, actor: InteractionActor) {
|
|
if (!actor.agentId || !actor.runId) return;
|
|
// Keep the same issue -> run lock order as task mutation and checkout.
|
|
await tx.select({ id: issues.id }).from(issues)
|
|
.where(and(eq(issues.id, issue.id), eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId))).for("update");
|
|
await assertAgentRunWriteAllowed(tx, issue.companyId, actor);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type CreateInteractionOptions = {
|
|
/** Keep independently owned pending cards actionable. Internal runtime bridges use this. */
|
|
supersedePendingSiblingInteractions?: boolean;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
type InteractionWakeup = (
|
|
agentId: string,
|
|
options: {
|
|
source: "automation";
|
|
triggerDetail: "system";
|
|
reason: "issue_commented";
|
|
payload: Record<string, unknown>;
|
|
idempotencyKey: string;
|
|
allowRunCoalescing?: boolean;
|
|
requestedByActorType: "system";
|
|
requestedByActorId: string;
|
|
contextSnapshot: Record<string, unknown>;
|
|
},
|
|
) => Promise<unknown>;
|
|
|
|
export type IssueThreadInteractionServiceOptions = {
|
|
resolvePullRequestState?: (
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
reference: GitHubPullRequestReference,
|
|
) => Promise<PullRequestMergeState>;
|
|
wakeup?: InteractionWakeup;
|
|
pullRequestCacheTtlMs?: number;
|
|
now?: () => Date;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
type DbTransaction = Parameters<Parameters<Db["transaction"]>[0]>[0];
|
|
export type InteractionResolutionMutationOptions = {
|
|
/** Confirmation accept/reject nested in an outer transaction must defer these
|
|
* effects and flush them with the root database only after its commit. */
|
|
deferConfirmationCommitEffects?: (effect: (committedDb: Db) => Promise<void>) => void;
|
|
beforeResolveInTransaction?: (tx: DbTransaction) => Promise<void>;
|
|
afterResolveInTransaction?: (
|
|
tx: DbTransaction,
|
|
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
) => Promise<void>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const GITHUB_PULL_REQUEST_URL_PATTERN =
|
|
/https:\/\/(?:www\.)?github\.com\/([A-Za-z0-9_.-]+)\/([A-Za-z0-9_.-]+)\/pull\/([1-9][0-9]*)/gi;
|
|
const GITHUB_PULL_REQUEST_SHORTHAND_PATTERN =
|
|
/(^|[^A-Za-z0-9_.-])([A-Za-z0-9_.-]+)\/([A-Za-z0-9_.-]+)#([1-9][0-9]*)\b/g;
|
|
const MERGE_CONFIRMATION_INTENT_PATTERN =
|
|
/^(?:please\s+)?(?:confirm(?:\s+that)?\s+.{0,80}\s+)?(?:merge|merged)\b|\bready\s+to\s+merge\b/i;
|
|
const MERGE_CONFIRMATION_ALLOWED_WORDS = new Set([
|
|
"all",
|
|
"and",
|
|
"approved",
|
|
"are",
|
|
"both",
|
|
"checks",
|
|
"ci",
|
|
"confirm",
|
|
"github",
|
|
"green",
|
|
"is",
|
|
"it",
|
|
"link",
|
|
"linked",
|
|
"links",
|
|
"merge",
|
|
"merged",
|
|
"merging",
|
|
"passed",
|
|
"passing",
|
|
"please",
|
|
"pr",
|
|
"primary",
|
|
"prs",
|
|
"pull",
|
|
"ready",
|
|
"reference",
|
|
"references",
|
|
"request",
|
|
"requests",
|
|
"review",
|
|
"secondary",
|
|
"tests",
|
|
"that",
|
|
"the",
|
|
"these",
|
|
"this",
|
|
"to",
|
|
"url",
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
function isMergeConfirmationOnlyText(value: string) {
|
|
GITHUB_PULL_REQUEST_URL_PATTERN.lastIndex = 0;
|
|
const withoutUrls = value.replace(
|
|
GITHUB_PULL_REQUEST_URL_PATTERN,
|
|
" pr_reference ",
|
|
);
|
|
GITHUB_PULL_REQUEST_SHORTHAND_PATTERN.lastIndex = 0;
|
|
const withoutReferences = withoutUrls.replace(
|
|
GITHUB_PULL_REQUEST_SHORTHAND_PATTERN,
|
|
(_match, prefix: string) => `${prefix} pr_reference `,
|
|
);
|
|
const normalized = withoutReferences
|
|
.replace(/\b(?:github-)?pr-[1-9][0-9]*\b/gi, " pr_reference ")
|
|
.replace(/[`*_\[\]{}()<>:;,.!?"'=+&|\\/-]+/g, " ")
|
|
.trim()
|
|
.toLowerCase();
|
|
if (!normalized) return true;
|
|
return normalized
|
|
.split(/\s+/)
|
|
.every(
|
|
(word) =>
|
|
word === "pr_reference" || MERGE_CONFIRMATION_ALLOWED_WORDS.has(word),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export function getMergeConfirmationPullRequestReferences(
|
|
row: Pick<
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
"kind" | "title" | "summary" | "payload"
|
|
>,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (row.kind !== "request_confirmation") return [];
|
|
const payload =
|
|
row.payload &&
|
|
typeof row.payload === "object" &&
|
|
!Array.isArray(row.payload)
|
|
? (row.payload as unknown as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
: null;
|
|
if (
|
|
!payload ||
|
|
payload.toolAction !== undefined ||
|
|
payload.secretProposal !== undefined
|
|
)
|
|
return [];
|
|
|
|
const target =
|
|
payload.target &&
|
|
typeof payload.target === "object" &&
|
|
!Array.isArray(payload.target)
|
|
? (payload.target as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
: null;
|
|
// Plan/document confirmations and governed action cards must never inherit
|
|
// merge-confirmation authority merely because their prose links to a PR.
|
|
if (target?.type === "issue_document") return [];
|
|
|
|
const intentValues = [
|
|
row.title,
|
|
row.summary,
|
|
payload.prompt,
|
|
payload.acceptLabel,
|
|
];
|
|
const intentText = intentValues
|
|
.filter((value): value is string => typeof value === "string")
|
|
.join("\n");
|
|
if (!MERGE_CONFIRMATION_INTENT_PATTERN.test(intentText)) return [];
|
|
|
|
const trustedTextValues = [
|
|
...intentValues,
|
|
payload.detailsMarkdown,
|
|
target?.key,
|
|
target?.label,
|
|
target?.href,
|
|
];
|
|
// System acceptance is intentionally fail-closed: after replacing recognized
|
|
// PR references, every trusted field must contain merge-only vocabulary. This
|
|
// prevents an otherwise valid merge prompt from smuggling an additional action
|
|
// that a governed-action denylist did not anticipate.
|
|
if (
|
|
!trustedTextValues.every(
|
|
(value) =>
|
|
typeof value !== "string" || isMergeConfirmationOnlyText(value),
|
|
)
|
|
) {
|
|
return [];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return extractGitHubPullRequestReferences(trustedTextValues);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const ISSUE_THREAD_INTERACTION_IDEMPOTENCY_CONSTRAINT =
|
|
"issue_thread_interactions_company_issue_idempotency_uq";
|
|
|
|
type IssueWakeTarget = {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
assigneeAgentId: string | null;
|
|
assigneeUserId?: string | null;
|
|
status: string;
|
|
workMode?: string;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
type ResolvedInteractionResult = {
|
|
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction;
|
|
createdIssues: IssueWakeTarget[];
|
|
continuationIssue?: IssueWakeTarget | null;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
type IssueThreadInteractionRow = typeof issueThreadInteractions.$inferSelect;
|
|
type IssueTouchDb = Pick<Db, "update">;
|
|
|
|
function isNativeCompletionReview(
|
|
row: Pick<IssueThreadInteractionRow, "kind" | "payload">,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (row.kind !== "request_confirmation") return false;
|
|
const payload =
|
|
row.payload &&
|
|
typeof row.payload === "object" &&
|
|
!Array.isArray(row.payload)
|
|
? (row.payload as unknown as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
: {};
|
|
const target =
|
|
payload.target &&
|
|
typeof payload.target === "object" &&
|
|
!Array.isArray(payload.target)
|
|
? (payload.target as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
: {};
|
|
return target.type === "custom" && target.key === "native_completion_review";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export const DEFAULT_RESOLVER_POLICY_BY_KIND: Record<
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionKind,
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy
|
|
> = {
|
|
suggest_tasks: "anyone",
|
|
ask_user_questions: "anyone",
|
|
request_confirmation: "anyone",
|
|
request_checkbox_confirmation: "anyone",
|
|
request_item_verdicts: "anyone",
|
|
connection_intent: "human_only",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const RESOLVER_POLICY_RESTRICTION_RANK: Record<
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy,
|
|
number
|
|
> = {
|
|
anyone: 0,
|
|
not_creator: 1,
|
|
human_only: 2,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
export function resolveInteractionPolicy(args: {
|
|
kind: IssueThreadInteractionKind;
|
|
requested?: IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy;
|
|
governance: InteractionResolverGovernance;
|
|
hasToolAction: boolean;
|
|
hasSecretProposal?: boolean;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const kindGovernance = args.governance[args.kind];
|
|
const requestedPolicyInput =
|
|
args.requested ??
|
|
kindGovernance?.defaultPolicy ??
|
|
DEFAULT_RESOLVER_POLICY_BY_KIND[args.kind];
|
|
const requestedResolverPolicy =
|
|
normalizeIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy(requestedPolicyInput);
|
|
const resolverPolicyProvenance: IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicyProvenance =
|
|
args.requested === undefined ? "inherited" : "explicit";
|
|
|
|
let effectiveResolverPolicy = requestedResolverPolicy;
|
|
let effectiveResolverPolicySource: IssueThreadInteractionEffectiveResolverPolicySource =
|
|
"requested";
|
|
if (args.hasToolAction || args.hasSecretProposal) {
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy = "human_only";
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicySource = "governed_action";
|
|
} else if (kindGovernance?.cap) {
|
|
const cap = normalizeIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy(
|
|
kindGovernance.cap,
|
|
);
|
|
if (
|
|
RESOLVER_POLICY_RESTRICTION_RANK[cap] >
|
|
RESOLVER_POLICY_RESTRICTION_RANK[effectiveResolverPolicy]
|
|
) {
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy = cap;
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicySource = "company_cap";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return {
|
|
requestedResolverPolicy,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicySource,
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function resolverActor(actor: InteractionActor) {
|
|
if (actor.systemId)
|
|
return { type: "system" as const, systemId: actor.systemId };
|
|
if (actor.agentId) {
|
|
return {
|
|
type: "agent" as const,
|
|
agentId: actor.agentId,
|
|
runId: actor.runId,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
if (actor.userId) return { type: "user" as const, userId: actor.userId };
|
|
// Missing principals must fail closed. Internal maintenance paths that are
|
|
// intentionally system-owned provide an explicit systemId.
|
|
return { type: "agent" as const, agentId: null, runId: null };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function assertInteractionResolutionAllowed(
|
|
current: IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
) {
|
|
return assertIssueThreadInteractionResolverAudience({
|
|
actor: resolverActor(actor),
|
|
interaction: current,
|
|
additionalRestriction: actor.resolverPolicyRestriction,
|
|
governedAction:
|
|
current.kind === "request_confirmation" &&
|
|
current.payload !== null &&
|
|
typeof current.payload === "object" &&
|
|
(("toolAction" in current.payload &&
|
|
current.payload.toolAction !== undefined) ||
|
|
("secretProposal" in current.payload &&
|
|
current.payload.secretProposal !== undefined)),
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type IssueResolutionContext = {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
status: string;
|
|
executionRunId: string | null;
|
|
workMode: string;
|
|
assigneeAgentId: string | null;
|
|
assigneeUserId: string | null;
|
|
reviewPolicy: IssueReviewPolicy | null;
|
|
createdByAgentId: string | null;
|
|
createdByUserId: string | null;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
async function assertRequestConfirmationResolutionAllowedUnderLock(
|
|
tx: Db,
|
|
issue: IssueResolutionContext,
|
|
interaction: IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (isTerminalIssueStatus(issue.status)) {
|
|
throw conflict(
|
|
"Interaction is no longer actionable because the issue is closed",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const isReviewVerdict =
|
|
issue.status === "in_review" &&
|
|
isRequestConfirmationLikeKind(interaction.kind) &&
|
|
(await isIssueReviewVerdictInteraction(tx, { issue, interaction }));
|
|
|
|
assertInteractionResolutionAllowed(interaction, actor);
|
|
if (actor.agentId && isNativeCompletionReview(interaction)) {
|
|
const target = (interaction.payload as { target?: { revisionId?: string } }).target;
|
|
if (!actor.runId || !await getNativeReviewAssignment(tx, {
|
|
companyId: issue.companyId, issueId: issue.id, agentId: actor.agentId,
|
|
contextSnapshot: { nativeReviewInteractionId: interaction.id, nativeReviewDecisionId: target?.revisionId },
|
|
actingRunId: actor.runId,
|
|
issueExecutionRunId: issue.executionRunId,
|
|
})) throw conflict("This completion review is no longer current or assigned to this agent.");
|
|
}
|
|
if (!isReviewVerdict) return;
|
|
|
|
const verdictActor = actor.agentId
|
|
? { type: "agent" as const, id: actor.agentId }
|
|
: actor.userId
|
|
? { type: "user" as const, id: actor.userId }
|
|
: null;
|
|
if (!verdictActor) {
|
|
throw forbidden("A review verdict requires an authenticated agent or user");
|
|
}
|
|
await assertIssueReviewVerdictActorAllowed(tx, {
|
|
issue,
|
|
actor: verdictActor,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const REQUEST_CONFIRMATION_INTERACTION_KINDS = [
|
|
"request_confirmation",
|
|
"request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
] as const;
|
|
type RequestConfirmationLikeKind =
|
|
(typeof REQUEST_CONFIRMATION_INTERACTION_KINDS)[number];
|
|
type RequestConfirmationLikeInteraction =
|
|
RequestConfirmationInteraction | RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction;
|
|
|
|
const TARGET_BOUND_INTERACTION_KINDS = [
|
|
...REQUEST_CONFIRMATION_INTERACTION_KINDS,
|
|
"request_item_verdicts",
|
|
] as const;
|
|
type TargetBoundInteractionKind =
|
|
(typeof TARGET_BOUND_INTERACTION_KINDS)[number];
|
|
type TargetBoundInteraction =
|
|
RequestConfirmationLikeInteraction | RequestItemVerdictsInteraction;
|
|
|
|
const USER_COMMENT_SUPERSEDABLE_INTERACTION_KINDS = [
|
|
...TARGET_BOUND_INTERACTION_KINDS,
|
|
"ask_user_questions",
|
|
"connection_intent",
|
|
] as const;
|
|
type UserCommentSupersedableKind =
|
|
(typeof USER_COMMENT_SUPERSEDABLE_INTERACTION_KINDS)[number];
|
|
type UserCommentSupersedableInteraction =
|
|
| TargetBoundInteraction
|
|
| AskUserQuestionsInteraction
|
|
| ConnectionIntentInteraction;
|
|
|
|
function isRequestConfirmationLikeKind(
|
|
kind: string,
|
|
): kind is RequestConfirmationLikeKind {
|
|
return (REQUEST_CONFIRMATION_INTERACTION_KINDS as readonly string[]).includes(
|
|
kind,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function isTargetBoundInteractionKind(
|
|
kind: string,
|
|
): kind is TargetBoundInteractionKind {
|
|
return (TARGET_BOUND_INTERACTION_KINDS as readonly string[]).includes(kind);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function isUserCommentSupersedableKind(
|
|
kind: string,
|
|
): kind is UserCommentSupersedableKind {
|
|
return (
|
|
USER_COMMENT_SUPERSEDABLE_INTERACTION_KINDS as readonly string[]
|
|
).includes(kind);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function isEquivalentCreateRequest(
|
|
row: IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
input: CreateIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
defaultAddresseeUserId: string | null = null,
|
|
) {
|
|
return (
|
|
row.kind === input.kind &&
|
|
row.requestedResolverPolicy === input.resolverPolicy &&
|
|
(row.addresseeAgentId ?? null) === (input.addresseeAgentId ?? null) &&
|
|
(row.addresseeUserId ?? defaultAddresseeUserId) === (input.addresseeUserId ?? defaultAddresseeUserId) &&
|
|
row.continuationPolicy === input.continuationPolicy &&
|
|
(row.idempotencyKey ?? null) === (input.idempotencyKey ?? null) &&
|
|
(row.sourceCommentId ?? null) === (input.sourceCommentId ?? null) &&
|
|
(row.sourceRunId ?? null) === (input.sourceRunId ?? null) &&
|
|
(row.title ?? null) === (input.title ?? null) &&
|
|
(row.summary ?? null) === (input.summary ?? null) &&
|
|
(row.createdByAgentId ?? null) === (actor.agentId ?? null) &&
|
|
(row.createdByUserId ?? null) === (actor.userId ?? null) &&
|
|
isDeepStrictEqual(row.payload, input.payload)
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Parse a stored interaction `result` blob tolerantly. Rows persisted by older
|
|
* builds can carry a `result` shape that predates the current schema — e.g. a
|
|
* legacy `outcome` value ("withdrawn_by_creator") no longer in the enum.
|
|
* `hydrateInteraction` runs over every row in `listForIssue`, so a hard
|
|
* `.parse()` on one stale row throws and 500s the *entire* issue's interaction
|
|
* list — which bricks both the web thread and plugin consumers such as the
|
|
* Slack gateway's notifier/digest/aging loops (LOOA-629). Degrade an
|
|
* unparseable `result` to `null` (the interaction still lists; a
|
|
* resolved-but-unparseable result is treated as absent) instead of throwing.
|
|
*/
|
|
function parseStoredInteractionResult<S extends z.ZodTypeAny>(
|
|
schema: S,
|
|
raw: unknown,
|
|
row: Pick<IssueThreadInteractionRow, "id" | "kind">,
|
|
): z.infer<S> | null {
|
|
if (raw == null) return null;
|
|
const parsed = schema.safeParse(raw);
|
|
if (parsed.success) return parsed.data;
|
|
console.warn(
|
|
`[paperclip] Dropping unparseable ${row.kind} interaction result for interaction ${row.id}`,
|
|
parsed.error.issues,
|
|
);
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function hydrateInteraction(
|
|
row: IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
): IssueThreadInteraction {
|
|
const storedRequestedResolverPolicy =
|
|
row.requestedResolverPolicy as IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy;
|
|
const storedEffectiveResolverPolicy =
|
|
row.effectiveResolverPolicy as IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy;
|
|
const resolverPolicyProvenance =
|
|
row.resolverPolicyProvenance ??
|
|
(storedRequestedResolverPolicy === "board_only" ||
|
|
storedRequestedResolverPolicy === "board_or_agents"
|
|
? "legacy_inherited_restriction"
|
|
: "inherited");
|
|
const canonicalizeStoredPolicy = (
|
|
policy: IssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy,
|
|
): IssueThreadInteractionCanonicalResolverPolicy =>
|
|
canonicalizeStoredResolverPolicy(policy, resolverPolicyProvenance);
|
|
const requestedResolverPolicy = canonicalizeStoredPolicy(
|
|
storedRequestedResolverPolicy,
|
|
);
|
|
const effectiveResolverPolicy = canonicalizeStoredPolicy(
|
|
storedEffectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
);
|
|
const base = {
|
|
...row,
|
|
idempotencyKey: row.idempotencyKey ?? null,
|
|
addresseeAgentId: row.addresseeAgentId ?? null,
|
|
addresseeUserId: row.addresseeUserId ?? null,
|
|
status: row.status as IssueThreadInteraction["status"],
|
|
continuationPolicy:
|
|
row.continuationPolicy as IssueThreadInteraction["continuationPolicy"],
|
|
resolverPolicy: requestedResolverPolicy,
|
|
requestedResolverPolicy,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicySource:
|
|
row.effectiveResolverPolicySource ?? "requested",
|
|
legacyResolverPolicyAliases: {
|
|
requested: legacyIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicyAlias(
|
|
requestedResolverPolicy,
|
|
),
|
|
effective: legacyIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicyAlias(
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
switch (row.kind) {
|
|
case "suggest_tasks":
|
|
return {
|
|
...base,
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
payload: suggestTasksPayloadSchema.parse(row.payload),
|
|
result: parseStoredInteractionResult(
|
|
suggestTasksResultSchema,
|
|
row.result,
|
|
row,
|
|
),
|
|
} satisfies SuggestTasksInteraction;
|
|
case "ask_user_questions":
|
|
return {
|
|
...base,
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
payload: askUserQuestionsPayloadSchema.parse(row.payload),
|
|
result: parseStoredInteractionResult(
|
|
askUserQuestionsResultSchema,
|
|
row.result,
|
|
row,
|
|
),
|
|
} satisfies AskUserQuestionsInteraction;
|
|
case "request_confirmation":
|
|
return {
|
|
...base,
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
payload: requestConfirmationPayloadSchema.parse(row.payload),
|
|
result: parseStoredInteractionResult(
|
|
requestConfirmationResultSchema,
|
|
row.result,
|
|
row,
|
|
),
|
|
} satisfies RequestConfirmationInteraction;
|
|
case "request_checkbox_confirmation":
|
|
return {
|
|
...base,
|
|
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
payload: requestCheckboxConfirmationPayloadSchema.parse(row.payload),
|
|
result: parseStoredInteractionResult(
|
|
requestCheckboxConfirmationResultSchema,
|
|
row.result,
|
|
row,
|
|
),
|
|
} satisfies RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction;
|
|
case "request_item_verdicts":
|
|
return {
|
|
...base,
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
payload: requestItemVerdictsPayloadSchema.parse(row.payload),
|
|
result: parseStoredInteractionResult(
|
|
requestItemVerdictsResultSchema,
|
|
row.result,
|
|
row,
|
|
),
|
|
} satisfies RequestItemVerdictsInteraction;
|
|
case "connection_intent":
|
|
return {
|
|
...base,
|
|
kind: "connection_intent",
|
|
payload: connectionIntentPayloadSchema.parse(row.payload),
|
|
result: parseStoredInteractionResult(
|
|
connectionIntentResultSchema,
|
|
row.result,
|
|
row,
|
|
),
|
|
} satisfies ConnectionIntentInteraction;
|
|
default:
|
|
throw unprocessable(`Unknown interaction kind: ${row.kind}`);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function touchIssue(db: IssueTouchDb, issueId: string) {
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(issues)
|
|
.set({ updatedAt: new Date() })
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, issueId));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function isTerminalIssueStatus(status: string) {
|
|
return status === "done" || status === "cancelled";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function interactionNotFoundError() {
|
|
return notFound("Interaction not found", { code: "interaction_not_found" });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function interactionIssueClosedError() {
|
|
return issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
409,
|
|
"interaction_issue_closed",
|
|
"Interaction is no longer actionable because the issue is closed",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function interactionAlreadyResolvedError() {
|
|
return issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
409,
|
|
"interaction_already_resolved",
|
|
"Interaction has already been resolved",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function interactionTerminalError(row: { status: string; result?: unknown }) {
|
|
const result =
|
|
row.result && typeof row.result === "object" && !Array.isArray(row.result)
|
|
? (row.result as unknown as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
: null;
|
|
if (result?.outcome === "stale_target") {
|
|
return issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
409,
|
|
"interaction_stale_target",
|
|
"Interaction target is stale",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
result?.outcome === "superseded_by_comment" ||
|
|
result?.outcome === "superseded_by_newer_request"
|
|
) {
|
|
return issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
409,
|
|
"interaction_superseded",
|
|
"Interaction has been superseded",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (result?.outcome === "issue_closed") return interactionIssueClosedError();
|
|
return issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
409,
|
|
"interaction_already_resolved",
|
|
"Interaction has already been resolved",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function shouldReturnAcceptedConfirmationToCreatorAgent(args: {
|
|
issue: IssueResolutionContext;
|
|
current: IssueThreadInteractionRow;
|
|
actor: InteractionActor;
|
|
}) {
|
|
if (!isRequestConfirmationLikeKind(args.current.kind)) return false;
|
|
if (!args.current.createdByAgentId) return false;
|
|
if (!args.actor.userId) return false;
|
|
if (isTerminalIssueStatus(args.issue.status)) return false;
|
|
if (args.issue.assigneeAgentId) {
|
|
return (
|
|
args.issue.status === "in_review" &&
|
|
args.issue.assigneeAgentId === args.current.createdByAgentId
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
return Boolean(args.issue.assigneeUserId);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function shouldSupersedeInteractionOnUserComment(interaction: UserCommentSupersedableInteraction) {
|
|
if (interaction.kind === "connection_intent") return false;
|
|
if (interaction.kind === "request_confirmation" && interaction.payload.toolAction) return false;
|
|
return interaction.payload.supersedeOnUserComment === true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function normalizeCreateInteractionInput(
|
|
input: CreateIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
): CreateIssueThreadInteraction {
|
|
switch (input.kind) {
|
|
case "ask_user_questions":
|
|
return {
|
|
...input,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...input.payload,
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: input.payload.supersedeOnUserComment ?? false,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
case "request_confirmation":
|
|
return {
|
|
...input,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...input.payload,
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: input.payload.supersedeOnUserComment ?? false,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
case "request_checkbox_confirmation":
|
|
return {
|
|
...input,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...input.payload,
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: input.payload.supersedeOnUserComment ?? false,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
case "request_item_verdicts":
|
|
return {
|
|
...input,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...input.payload,
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: input.payload.supersedeOnUserComment ?? false,
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
default:
|
|
return input;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildSupersededByCommentResult(
|
|
row: IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
commentId: string,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (row.kind === "connection_intent") {
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "expired",
|
|
reason: "Superseded by a newer user comment",
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
if (row.kind === "ask_user_questions") {
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
|
|
commentId,
|
|
summaryMarkdown: null,
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (row.kind === "request_item_verdicts") {
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
row,
|
|
) as RequestItemVerdictsInteraction;
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "superseded_by_comment",
|
|
complete: false,
|
|
items: interaction.result?.items ?? [],
|
|
commentId,
|
|
} satisfies RequestItemVerdictsResult;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "superseded_by_comment",
|
|
commentId,
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildStaleTargetResult(
|
|
row: IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
staleTarget: RequestConfirmationTarget | null,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (row.kind === "request_item_verdicts") {
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
row,
|
|
) as RequestItemVerdictsInteraction;
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "stale_target",
|
|
complete: false,
|
|
items: interaction.result?.items ?? [],
|
|
staleTarget,
|
|
} satisfies RequestItemVerdictsResult;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "stale_target",
|
|
staleTarget,
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildSupersededByNewerRequestResult(replacementInteractionId: string) {
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "superseded_by_newer_request",
|
|
supersededByInteractionId: replacementInteractionId,
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// An agent that posts a fresh ask_user_questions while its own earlier ones on
|
|
// the same issue are still pending has replaced them — the newer card carries
|
|
// the real ask, so the stale siblings auto-expire (PAP-437). Mirrors the
|
|
// `superseded_by_comment` shape (ask_user_questions results key expiry off
|
|
// `expirationReason`, not `outcome`) so the UI can hide them cleanly.
|
|
function buildSupersededByNewerInteractionResult(
|
|
replacementInteractionId: string,
|
|
) {
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
expirationReason: "superseded_by_newer_interaction",
|
|
supersededByInteractionId: replacementInteractionId,
|
|
summaryMarkdown: null,
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildAdministrativeOutcomeResult(
|
|
row: IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
outcome: "withdrawn" | "issue_closed" | "addressee_deleted",
|
|
reason: string | null = null,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (row.kind === "connection_intent") {
|
|
return { version: 1, outcome: "expired", reason } as const;
|
|
}
|
|
if (row.kind === "ask_user_questions") {
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome,
|
|
reason,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
summaryMarkdown: null,
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
if (row.kind === "request_item_verdicts") {
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
row,
|
|
) as RequestItemVerdictsInteraction;
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome,
|
|
reason,
|
|
complete: false,
|
|
items: interaction.result?.items ?? [],
|
|
} satisfies RequestItemVerdictsResult;
|
|
}
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome,
|
|
reason,
|
|
...(linkedSecretProposalId(row)
|
|
? {
|
|
secretProposal: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
status: outcome === "withdrawn" ? "withdrawn" : "expired",
|
|
updatedAt: new Date().toISOString(),
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
: {}),
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildSkippedOutcomeResult(
|
|
row: IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
reason: string | null,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (row.kind === "ask_user_questions") {
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "skipped",
|
|
reason,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
cancelled: true,
|
|
cancellationReason: reason,
|
|
summaryMarkdown: null,
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
if (row.kind === "request_item_verdicts") {
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
row,
|
|
) as RequestItemVerdictsInteraction;
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "skipped",
|
|
reason,
|
|
complete: false,
|
|
items: interaction.result?.items ?? [],
|
|
} satisfies RequestItemVerdictsResult;
|
|
}
|
|
if (row.kind === "suggest_tasks") {
|
|
return {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "skipped",
|
|
reason,
|
|
createdTasks: [],
|
|
skippedClientKeys: [],
|
|
} as const;
|
|
}
|
|
return { version: 1, outcome: "skipped", reason } as const;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Rollback sentinel: the interaction was resolved by another actor between the
|
|
// pending-rows read and the conditional update, so the enclosing transaction's
|
|
// tool-action revocation must be undone.
|
|
class InteractionResolvedConcurrentlyError extends Error {
|
|
constructor() {
|
|
super("Interaction was resolved concurrently");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A request_confirmation card can govern a parked tool call via a linked
|
|
// tool_action_requests row. Administrative resolutions (withdraw, terminal-issue
|
|
// expiry) must settle that row too, or the parked call stays approvable under
|
|
// its own one-hour lifecycle after its card is gone.
|
|
async function resolveLinkedToolActionRequests(
|
|
db: Pick<Db, "update">,
|
|
interaction: Pick<IssueThreadInteractionRow, "id" | "companyId" | "kind">,
|
|
outcome: {
|
|
status: "expired" | "cancelled";
|
|
fromStatuses: Array<"pending" | "approved">;
|
|
actor: InteractionActor;
|
|
now: Date;
|
|
},
|
|
) {
|
|
if (interaction.kind !== "request_confirmation") return;
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(toolActionRequests)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: outcome.status,
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: outcome.actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: outcome.actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: outcome.now,
|
|
updatedAt: outcome.now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(toolActionRequests.companyId, interaction.companyId),
|
|
eq(toolActionRequests.interactionId, interaction.id),
|
|
inArray(toolActionRequests.status, outcome.fromStatuses),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function linkedSecretProposalId(
|
|
interaction: Pick<IssueThreadInteractionRow, "kind" | "payload">,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (interaction.kind !== "request_confirmation") return null;
|
|
const payload =
|
|
interaction.payload &&
|
|
typeof interaction.payload === "object" &&
|
|
!Array.isArray(interaction.payload)
|
|
? (interaction.payload as unknown as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
: null;
|
|
const secretProposal =
|
|
payload?.secretProposal &&
|
|
typeof payload.secretProposal === "object" &&
|
|
!Array.isArray(payload.secretProposal)
|
|
? (payload.secretProposal as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
: null;
|
|
return typeof secretProposal?.proposalId === "string"
|
|
? secretProposal.proposalId
|
|
: null;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function lockLinkedSecretProposal(
|
|
db: Db,
|
|
interaction: Pick<
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
"id" | "companyId" | "kind" | "payload"
|
|
>,
|
|
) {
|
|
const proposalId = linkedSecretProposalId(interaction);
|
|
if (!proposalId) return;
|
|
await db
|
|
.select({ id: companySecretProposals.id })
|
|
.from(companySecretProposals)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.id, proposalId),
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.companyId, interaction.companyId),
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.interactionId, interaction.id),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.for("update");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function resolveLinkedSecretProposal(
|
|
db: Db,
|
|
interaction: Pick<
|
|
IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
"id" | "companyId" | "kind" | "payload"
|
|
>,
|
|
outcome: {
|
|
status: "rejected" | "withdrawn" | "expired";
|
|
actor: InteractionActor;
|
|
reason?: string | null;
|
|
now: Date;
|
|
},
|
|
) {
|
|
const proposalId = linkedSecretProposalId(interaction);
|
|
if (!proposalId) return;
|
|
const [proposal] = await db
|
|
.update(companySecretProposals)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: outcome.status,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: outcome.actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: outcome.now,
|
|
resolutionReason: outcome.reason ?? null,
|
|
valueCiphertext: null,
|
|
ciphertextScrubbedAt: outcome.now,
|
|
updatedAt: outcome.now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.id, proposalId),
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.companyId, interaction.companyId),
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.interactionId, interaction.id),
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (!proposal) throw conflict("Linked secret proposal is no longer pending");
|
|
const actorType = outcome.actor.userId
|
|
? ("user" as const)
|
|
: outcome.actor.agentId
|
|
? ("agent" as const)
|
|
: ("system" as const);
|
|
const actorId =
|
|
outcome.actor.userId ??
|
|
outcome.actor.agentId ??
|
|
outcome.actor.systemId ??
|
|
"system";
|
|
await logActivity(db, {
|
|
companyId: interaction.companyId,
|
|
actorType,
|
|
actorId,
|
|
action: `secret.proposal.${outcome.status}`,
|
|
entityType: "company_secret_proposal",
|
|
entityId: proposal.id,
|
|
agentId: proposal.proposedByAgentId,
|
|
runId: proposal.originRunId,
|
|
details: {
|
|
ciphertextScrubbed: true,
|
|
issueId: proposal.originIssueId,
|
|
interactionId: interaction.id,
|
|
reason: outcome.reason ?? null,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function resolveActorKind(
|
|
interaction: Pick<
|
|
IssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
"resolvedByAgentId" | "resolvedByUserId"
|
|
>,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (interaction.resolvedByAgentId) return "agent";
|
|
if (interaction.resolvedByUserId) return "user";
|
|
return "system";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function resolveCreatorKind(
|
|
interaction: Pick<
|
|
IssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
"createdByAgentId" | "createdByUserId"
|
|
>,
|
|
) {
|
|
if (interaction.createdByAgentId) return "agent";
|
|
if (interaction.createdByUserId) return "user";
|
|
return undefined;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function deriveTargetType(interaction: IssueThreadInteraction) {
|
|
switch (interaction.kind) {
|
|
case "request_confirmation":
|
|
case "request_checkbox_confirmation":
|
|
case "request_item_verdicts":
|
|
return interaction.payload.target?.type ?? "none";
|
|
default:
|
|
return "none";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function deriveResolutionReason(interaction: IssueThreadInteraction) {
|
|
switch (interaction.status) {
|
|
case "accepted":
|
|
return "accepted";
|
|
case "rejected":
|
|
return "rejected";
|
|
case "cancelled":
|
|
if (
|
|
interaction.result &&
|
|
"outcome" in interaction.result &&
|
|
interaction.result.outcome === "skipped"
|
|
) {
|
|
return "skipped";
|
|
}
|
|
return "cancelled";
|
|
case "expired": {
|
|
if (interaction.kind === "connection_intent") {
|
|
return interaction.result?.outcome ?? "expired";
|
|
}
|
|
if (interaction.kind === "ask_user_questions") {
|
|
return interaction.result?.expirationReason ?? "expired";
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
interaction.kind === "request_confirmation" ||
|
|
interaction.kind === "request_checkbox_confirmation"
|
|
) {
|
|
return interaction.result?.outcome ?? "expired";
|
|
}
|
|
if (interaction.kind === "request_item_verdicts") {
|
|
return interaction.result?.outcome ?? "expired";
|
|
}
|
|
return "expired";
|
|
}
|
|
case "answered": {
|
|
if (interaction.kind === "request_item_verdicts") {
|
|
return interaction.result?.outcome ?? "answered";
|
|
}
|
|
return "answered";
|
|
}
|
|
default:
|
|
return undefined;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function nonNegativeInteger(value: number) {
|
|
if (!Number.isFinite(value)) return 0;
|
|
return Math.max(0, Math.trunc(value));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildInteractionResolvedCounts(
|
|
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
args?: {
|
|
createdTaskCount?: number;
|
|
},
|
|
) {
|
|
switch (interaction.kind) {
|
|
case "suggest_tasks":
|
|
return {
|
|
createdTaskCount: nonNegativeInteger(args?.createdTaskCount ?? 0),
|
|
skippedTaskCount: nonNegativeInteger(
|
|
interaction.result?.skippedClientKeys?.length ?? 0,
|
|
),
|
|
};
|
|
case "request_checkbox_confirmation":
|
|
return {
|
|
optionCount: nonNegativeInteger(interaction.payload.options.length),
|
|
selectedOptionCount: nonNegativeInteger(
|
|
interaction.result?.selectedOptionIds?.length ?? 0,
|
|
),
|
|
};
|
|
case "ask_user_questions":
|
|
return {
|
|
questionCount: nonNegativeInteger(interaction.payload.questions.length),
|
|
answeredQuestionCount: nonNegativeInteger(
|
|
interaction.result?.answers?.length ?? 0,
|
|
),
|
|
};
|
|
case "request_item_verdicts":
|
|
return {
|
|
itemCount: nonNegativeInteger(interaction.payload.items.length),
|
|
resolvedItemCount: nonNegativeInteger(
|
|
interaction.result?.items?.length ?? 0,
|
|
),
|
|
};
|
|
default:
|
|
return {};
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function fetchCreatorAgentRoleById(
|
|
db: Pick<Db, "select">,
|
|
interactions: readonly IssueThreadInteraction[],
|
|
) {
|
|
const creatorAgentIds = [
|
|
...new Set(
|
|
interactions
|
|
.map((interaction) => interaction.createdByAgentId)
|
|
.filter((value): value is string => Boolean(value)),
|
|
),
|
|
];
|
|
if (creatorAgentIds.length === 0) return new Map<string, string | null>();
|
|
|
|
const rows = await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: agents.id,
|
|
role: agents.role,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(agents)
|
|
.where(inArray(agents.id, creatorAgentIds));
|
|
|
|
return new Map(rows.map((row) => [row.id, row.role] as const));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(
|
|
db: Pick<Db, "select">,
|
|
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
args?: {
|
|
createdTaskCount?: number;
|
|
creatorRoleByAgentId?: ReadonlyMap<string, string | null>;
|
|
},
|
|
) {
|
|
const telemetryClient = getTelemetryClient();
|
|
if (!telemetryClient) return;
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
let roleByAgentId =
|
|
args?.creatorRoleByAgentId ?? new Map<string, string | null>();
|
|
if (!args?.creatorRoleByAgentId) {
|
|
try {
|
|
roleByAgentId = await fetchCreatorAgentRoleById(db, [interaction]);
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
console.error(
|
|
"[paperclip] Failed to load interaction.resolved creator role",
|
|
error,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
const creatorAgentRole = interaction.createdByAgentId
|
|
? (roleByAgentId.get(interaction.createdByAgentId) ?? undefined)
|
|
: undefined;
|
|
|
|
trackInteractionResolved(telemetryClient, {
|
|
interactionKind:
|
|
interaction.kind === "connection_intent" ? "other" : interaction.kind,
|
|
status: interaction.status,
|
|
resolvedByKind: resolveActorKind(interaction),
|
|
resolutionReason: deriveResolutionReason(interaction),
|
|
createdByKind: resolveCreatorKind(interaction),
|
|
creatorAgentRole,
|
|
continuationPolicy: interaction.continuationPolicy,
|
|
targetType: deriveTargetType(interaction),
|
|
...buildInteractionResolvedCounts(interaction, {
|
|
createdTaskCount: args?.createdTaskCount,
|
|
}),
|
|
legacyInheritedRestriction:
|
|
interaction.resolverPolicyProvenance === "legacy_inherited_restriction",
|
|
});
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
console.error(
|
|
"[paperclip] Failed to emit interaction.resolved telemetry",
|
|
error,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function emitInteractionCreatedTelemetry(args: {
|
|
interactionKind: IssueThreadInteractionKind;
|
|
usedDeprecatedResolverPolicyAlias: boolean;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const telemetryClient = getTelemetryClient();
|
|
if (!telemetryClient) return;
|
|
|
|
try {
|
|
trackInteractionCreated(telemetryClient, {
|
|
...args,
|
|
interactionKind:
|
|
args.interactionKind === "connection_intent"
|
|
? "other"
|
|
: args.interactionKind,
|
|
});
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
console.error(
|
|
"[paperclip] Failed to emit interaction.created telemetry",
|
|
error,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function emitResolvedInteractionsTelemetry(
|
|
db: Pick<Db, "select">,
|
|
interactions: readonly IssueThreadInteraction[],
|
|
) {
|
|
if (interactions.length === 0 || !getTelemetryClient()) return;
|
|
let roleByAgentId = new Map<string, string | null>();
|
|
try {
|
|
roleByAgentId = await fetchCreatorAgentRoleById(db, interactions);
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
console.error(
|
|
"[paperclip] Failed to load interaction.resolved creator roles",
|
|
error,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
await Promise.all(
|
|
interactions.map((interaction) =>
|
|
emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(db, interaction, {
|
|
creatorRoleByAgentId: roleByAgentId,
|
|
}),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function isCommentAtOrAfterInteraction(args: {
|
|
commentCreatedAt: Date | string;
|
|
interactionCreatedAt: Date | string;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const commentCreatedAtMs = new Date(args.commentCreatedAt).getTime();
|
|
const interactionCreatedAtMs = new Date(args.interactionCreatedAt).getTime();
|
|
if (
|
|
!Number.isFinite(commentCreatedAtMs) ||
|
|
!Number.isFinite(interactionCreatedAtMs)
|
|
)
|
|
return false;
|
|
return commentCreatedAtMs >= interactionCreatedAtMs;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildTaskCreationOrder(
|
|
tasks: ReadonlyArray<SuggestTasksInteraction["payload"]["tasks"][number]>,
|
|
) {
|
|
const taskByClientKey = new Map(
|
|
tasks.map((task) => [task.clientKey, task] as const),
|
|
);
|
|
const ordered: Array<SuggestTasksInteraction["payload"]["tasks"][number]> =
|
|
[];
|
|
const state = new Map<string, "visiting" | "done">();
|
|
|
|
const visit = (clientKey: string) => {
|
|
const currentState = state.get(clientKey);
|
|
if (currentState === "done") return;
|
|
if (currentState === "visiting") {
|
|
throw unprocessable("Suggested tasks contain a parentClientKey cycle");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const task = taskByClientKey.get(clientKey);
|
|
if (!task) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(`Unknown parentClientKey: ${clientKey}`);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
state.set(clientKey, "visiting");
|
|
if (task.parentClientKey) {
|
|
visit(task.parentClientKey);
|
|
}
|
|
state.set(clientKey, "done");
|
|
ordered.push(task);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
for (const task of tasks) {
|
|
visit(task.clientKey);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return ordered;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export function resolveSelectedSuggestedTasks(args: {
|
|
interaction: SuggestTasksInteraction;
|
|
selectedClientKeys?: AcceptIssueThreadInteraction["selectedClientKeys"];
|
|
}) {
|
|
const taskByClientKey = new Map(
|
|
args.interaction.payload.tasks.map(
|
|
(task) => [task.clientKey, task] as const,
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
const selectedClientKeys =
|
|
args.selectedClientKeys ??
|
|
args.interaction.payload.tasks.map((task) => task.clientKey);
|
|
const selectedClientKeySet = new Set<string>();
|
|
|
|
for (const clientKey of selectedClientKeys) {
|
|
const task = taskByClientKey.get(clientKey);
|
|
if (!task) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(`Unknown suggested task clientKey: ${clientKey}`);
|
|
}
|
|
selectedClientKeySet.add(clientKey);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (selectedClientKeySet.size === 0) {
|
|
throw unprocessable("Select at least one suggested task to accept");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const clientKey of selectedClientKeySet) {
|
|
let parentClientKey =
|
|
taskByClientKey.get(clientKey)?.parentClientKey ?? null;
|
|
while (parentClientKey) {
|
|
if (!selectedClientKeySet.has(parentClientKey)) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Suggested task ${clientKey} requires its parent ${parentClientKey} to also be selected`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
parentClientKey =
|
|
taskByClientKey.get(parentClientKey)?.parentClientKey ?? null;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
selectedTasks: args.interaction.payload.tasks.filter((task) =>
|
|
selectedClientKeySet.has(task.clientKey),
|
|
),
|
|
skippedClientKeys: args.interaction.payload.tasks
|
|
.filter((task) => !selectedClientKeySet.has(task.clientKey))
|
|
.map((task) => task.clientKey),
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function resolveSelectedCheckboxConfirmationOptions(args: {
|
|
interaction: RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction;
|
|
selectedOptionIds?: AcceptIssueThreadInteraction["selectedOptionIds"];
|
|
}) {
|
|
const optionIds = new Set(
|
|
args.interaction.payload.options.map((option) => option.id),
|
|
);
|
|
const selectedOptionIds =
|
|
args.selectedOptionIds ??
|
|
args.interaction.payload.defaultSelectedOptionIds ??
|
|
[];
|
|
const selectedOptionIdSet = new Set<string>();
|
|
|
|
for (const optionId of selectedOptionIds) {
|
|
if (!optionIds.has(optionId)) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Unknown checkbox confirmation optionId: ${optionId}`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
selectedOptionIdSet.add(optionId);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const selectedCount = selectedOptionIdSet.size;
|
|
const minSelected = args.interaction.payload.minSelected ?? 0;
|
|
const maxSelected = args.interaction.payload.maxSelected ?? null;
|
|
if (selectedCount < minSelected) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Select at least ${minSelected} checkbox confirmation option(s)`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (maxSelected != null && selectedCount > maxSelected) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Select no more than ${maxSelected} checkbox confirmation option(s)`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return args.interaction.payload.options
|
|
.filter((option) => selectedOptionIdSet.has(option.id))
|
|
.map((option) => option.id);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function resolveRequestItemVerdictSubmissions(args: {
|
|
interaction: RequestItemVerdictsInteraction;
|
|
input: SubmitIssueThreadInteractionVerdicts;
|
|
actor: InteractionActor;
|
|
now: Date;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const existingItems = args.interaction.result?.items ?? [];
|
|
const existingById = new Map(
|
|
existingItems.map((item) => [item.id, item] as const),
|
|
);
|
|
const payloadItemIds = new Set(
|
|
args.interaction.payload.items.map((item) => item.id),
|
|
);
|
|
const enabledVerdicts = new Set(
|
|
args.interaction.payload.verdicts ?? ["approve", "reject"],
|
|
);
|
|
const requireReasonOn = new Set(
|
|
args.interaction.payload.requireReasonOn ?? ["reject"],
|
|
);
|
|
const newlyResolvedById = new Map<string, RequestItemVerdictsResultItem>();
|
|
const newlyResolvedItemIds: string[] = [];
|
|
|
|
for (const submitted of args.input.verdicts) {
|
|
if (!payloadItemIds.has(submitted.id)) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(`Unknown item verdict id: ${submitted.id}`);
|
|
}
|
|
if (existingById.has(submitted.id)) {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!enabledVerdicts.has(submitted.verdict)) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Verdict ${submitted.verdict} is not enabled for this item verdict request`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const reason = submitted.reason?.trim() ?? "";
|
|
if (requireReasonOn.has(submitted.verdict) && reason.length === 0) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`A reason is required when verdict is ${submitted.verdict}`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (newlyResolvedById.has(submitted.id)) {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
newlyResolvedById.set(submitted.id, {
|
|
id: submitted.id,
|
|
verdict: submitted.verdict,
|
|
...(reason ? { reason } : {}),
|
|
...(args.actor.userId ? { resolvedByUserId: args.actor.userId } : {}),
|
|
...(args.actor.agentId ? { resolvedByAgentId: args.actor.agentId } : {}),
|
|
...(args.actor.runId ? { resolvedByRunId: args.actor.runId } : {}),
|
|
resolvedAt: args.now,
|
|
});
|
|
newlyResolvedItemIds.push(submitted.id);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const nextById = new Map<string, RequestItemVerdictsResultItem>(
|
|
existingItems.map((item) => [item.id, item]),
|
|
);
|
|
for (const [id, item] of newlyResolvedById) {
|
|
nextById.set(id, item);
|
|
}
|
|
const items = args.interaction.payload.items
|
|
.map((item) => nextById.get(item.id))
|
|
.filter((item): item is RequestItemVerdictsResultItem => Boolean(item));
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
items,
|
|
complete: items.length === args.interaction.payload.items.length,
|
|
newlyResolvedItemIds,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function normalizeQuestionAnswers(args: {
|
|
questions: AskUserQuestionsInteraction["payload"]["questions"];
|
|
textQuestionIds?: ReadonlySet<string>;
|
|
answers: RespondIssueThreadInteraction["answers"];
|
|
}) {
|
|
const questionById = new Map(
|
|
args.questions.map((question) => [question.id, question] as const),
|
|
);
|
|
const answerByQuestionId = new Map<string, AskUserQuestionsAnswer>();
|
|
|
|
for (const answer of args.answers) {
|
|
const question = questionById.get(answer.questionId);
|
|
if (!question) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(`Unknown questionId: ${answer.questionId}`);
|
|
}
|
|
if (answerByQuestionId.has(answer.questionId)) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Duplicate answer for questionId: ${answer.questionId}`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const uniqueOptionIds = [...new Set(answer.optionIds)];
|
|
const validOptionIds = new Set(question.options.map((option) => option.id));
|
|
for (const optionId of uniqueOptionIds) {
|
|
if (!validOptionIds.has(optionId)) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Unknown optionId for question ${answer.questionId}: ${optionId}`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (question.selectionMode === "single" && uniqueOptionIds.length > 1) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Question ${answer.questionId} only allows one answer`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Canonical text fields may contain code or intentional whitespace. The
|
|
// legacy custom-answer path keeps its historical newline/trim behavior.
|
|
const otherText = args.textQuestionIds?.has(answer.questionId)
|
|
? answer.otherText ?? ""
|
|
: normalizeEscapedLineBreaks(answer.otherText ?? "").trim();
|
|
answerByQuestionId.set(answer.questionId, {
|
|
questionId: answer.questionId,
|
|
optionIds: uniqueOptionIds,
|
|
...(otherText ? { otherText } : {}),
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const question of args.questions) {
|
|
const answer = answerByQuestionId.get(question.id);
|
|
if (
|
|
question.required &&
|
|
(!answer || (answer.optionIds.length === 0 && !answer.otherText?.trim()))
|
|
) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(`Question ${question.id} requires an answer`);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return args.questions
|
|
.map((question) => answerByQuestionId.get(question.id))
|
|
.filter((answer): answer is AskUserQuestionsAnswer => Boolean(answer));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function getIssueDocumentTargetSnapshot(
|
|
db: Db | any,
|
|
args: {
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
issueId: string;
|
|
target: RequestConfirmationTarget;
|
|
// When true, take a FOR UPDATE row lock on the joined document so a concurrent
|
|
// revision publish (which updates documents.latestRevisionId) must serialize
|
|
// behind the caller's transaction. Only meaningful inside a transaction.
|
|
lockForUpdate?: boolean;
|
|
},
|
|
) {
|
|
if (args.target.type !== "issue_document") return null;
|
|
const targetIssueId = args.target.issueId ?? args.issueId;
|
|
const query = db
|
|
.select({
|
|
issueId: issueDocuments.issueId,
|
|
documentId: issueDocuments.documentId,
|
|
key: issueDocuments.key,
|
|
latestRevisionId: documents.latestRevisionId,
|
|
latestRevisionNumber: documents.latestRevisionNumber,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issueDocuments)
|
|
.innerJoin(documents, eq(issueDocuments.documentId, documents.id))
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueDocuments.companyId, args.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueDocuments.issueId, targetIssueId),
|
|
eq(issueDocuments.key, args.target.key),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
const row = await (
|
|
args.lockForUpdate ? query.for("update", { of: documents }) : query
|
|
).then(
|
|
(
|
|
rows: Array<{
|
|
issueId: string;
|
|
documentId: string;
|
|
key: string;
|
|
latestRevisionId: string | null;
|
|
latestRevisionNumber: number;
|
|
}>,
|
|
) => rows[0] ?? null,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
if (!row) return null;
|
|
if (args.target.documentId && args.target.documentId !== row.documentId)
|
|
return null;
|
|
return row;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildIssueDocumentTargetFromSnapshot(args: {
|
|
issueId: string;
|
|
snapshot: {
|
|
issueId: string;
|
|
documentId: string;
|
|
key: string;
|
|
latestRevisionId: string | null;
|
|
latestRevisionNumber: number;
|
|
} | null;
|
|
}): RequestConfirmationTarget | null {
|
|
if (!args.snapshot?.latestRevisionId) return null;
|
|
return {
|
|
type: "issue_document",
|
|
issueId: args.snapshot.issueId ?? args.issueId,
|
|
documentId: args.snapshot.documentId,
|
|
key: args.snapshot.key,
|
|
revisionId: args.snapshot.latestRevisionId,
|
|
revisionNumber: args.snapshot.latestRevisionNumber,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function buildIssueDocumentTargetFromDocument(args: {
|
|
issueId: string;
|
|
document: {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
key: string;
|
|
latestRevisionId?: string | null;
|
|
latestRevisionNumber?: number | null;
|
|
} | null;
|
|
}): RequestConfirmationTarget | null {
|
|
if (!args.document?.latestRevisionId) return null;
|
|
return {
|
|
type: "issue_document",
|
|
issueId: args.issueId,
|
|
documentId: args.document.id,
|
|
key: args.document.key,
|
|
revisionId: args.document.latestRevisionId,
|
|
revisionNumber: args.document.latestRevisionNumber ?? null,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function assertRequestConfirmationTargetIsCurrent(
|
|
db: Db | any,
|
|
args: {
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
issueId: string;
|
|
target?: RequestConfirmationTarget | null;
|
|
// Forwarded to getIssueDocumentTargetSnapshot; pass true when validating
|
|
// inside the create transaction so the revision read locks the document row
|
|
// and stays atomic with the interaction insert.
|
|
lockForUpdate?: boolean;
|
|
},
|
|
) {
|
|
if (!args.target) return;
|
|
if (args.target.type !== "issue_document") return;
|
|
const snapshot = await getIssueDocumentTargetSnapshot(db, {
|
|
companyId: args.companyId,
|
|
issueId: args.issueId,
|
|
target: args.target,
|
|
lockForUpdate: args.lockForUpdate,
|
|
});
|
|
if (!snapshot || snapshot.latestRevisionId !== args.target.revisionId) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"request_confirmation target must reference the current issue document revision",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
args.target.revisionNumber &&
|
|
snapshot.latestRevisionNumber !== args.target.revisionNumber
|
|
) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"request_confirmation target revisionNumber must match the current issue document revision",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function expireStaleRequestConfirmationTarget(
|
|
db: Db | any,
|
|
args: {
|
|
row: IssueThreadInteractionRow;
|
|
actor: InteractionActor;
|
|
},
|
|
): Promise<IssueThreadInteraction | null> {
|
|
if (
|
|
!isTargetBoundInteractionKind(args.row.kind) ||
|
|
args.row.status !== "pending"
|
|
)
|
|
return null;
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(args.row) as TargetBoundInteraction;
|
|
const target = interaction.payload.target ?? null;
|
|
if (!target) return null;
|
|
if (target.type !== "issue_document") return null;
|
|
|
|
const snapshot = await getIssueDocumentTargetSnapshot(db, {
|
|
companyId: args.row.companyId,
|
|
issueId: args.row.issueId,
|
|
target,
|
|
});
|
|
const isCurrent =
|
|
snapshot &&
|
|
snapshot.latestRevisionId === target.revisionId &&
|
|
(!target.revisionNumber ||
|
|
snapshot.latestRevisionNumber === target.revisionNumber);
|
|
if (isCurrent) return null;
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const currentTarget = buildIssueDocumentTargetFromSnapshot({
|
|
issueId: args.row.issueId,
|
|
snapshot,
|
|
});
|
|
const expireInTransaction = async (tx: Db | any) => {
|
|
const [updated] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
payload: currentTarget
|
|
? {
|
|
...interaction.payload,
|
|
target: currentTarget,
|
|
}
|
|
: interaction.payload,
|
|
result: {
|
|
...buildStaleTargetResult(args.row, target),
|
|
},
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: args.actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: args.actor.runId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: args.actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, args.row.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
|
|
if (!updated) {
|
|
throw issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
409,
|
|
"interaction_already_resolved",
|
|
"Interaction has already been resolved",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
await touchIssue(tx, args.row.issueId);
|
|
const expired = hydrateInteraction(updated);
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(tx, expired);
|
|
return expired;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const expired =
|
|
typeof db.transaction === "function"
|
|
? await db.transaction(expireInTransaction)
|
|
: await expireInTransaction(db);
|
|
await emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(db, expired);
|
|
return expired;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
export function issueThreadInteractionService(
|
|
db: Db,
|
|
opts: IssueThreadInteractionServiceOptions = {},
|
|
) {
|
|
const pullRequestStateCache = new Map<
|
|
string,
|
|
{ state: PullRequestMergeState; checkedAt: number }
|
|
>();
|
|
const now = opts.now ?? (() => new Date());
|
|
const defaultPullRequestStateResolver = opts.resolvePullRequestState
|
|
? null
|
|
: createPullRequestMergeStateResolver(db);
|
|
|
|
async function resolvePullRequestState(
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
reference: GitHubPullRequestReference,
|
|
): Promise<PullRequestMergeState> {
|
|
if (opts.resolvePullRequestState)
|
|
return opts.resolvePullRequestState(companyId, reference);
|
|
return defaultPullRequestStateResolver?.(companyId, reference) ?? "unknown";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function resolvePullRequestStates(
|
|
entries: Array<{
|
|
key: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
reference: GitHubPullRequestReference;
|
|
}>,
|
|
) {
|
|
const states = new Map<string, PullRequestMergeState>();
|
|
const pending = entries.slice();
|
|
const workerCount = Math.min(8, pending.length);
|
|
await Promise.all(
|
|
Array.from({ length: workerCount }, async () => {
|
|
while (pending.length > 0) {
|
|
const entry = pending.shift();
|
|
if (!entry) return;
|
|
const state = await resolvePullRequestState(
|
|
entry.companyId,
|
|
entry.reference,
|
|
);
|
|
states.set(entry.key, state);
|
|
}
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
return states;
|
|
}
|
|
async function getIdempotentInteraction(args: {
|
|
issueId: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
idempotencyKey: string;
|
|
}) {
|
|
return db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, args.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, args.issueId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.idempotencyKey, args.idempotencyKey),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Readiness is a projection, not durable interaction state. Use the same
|
|
// source-run predicate as accept so another run cannot hold a ready card back.
|
|
async function withAcceptanceReadiness(
|
|
interactions: IssueThreadInteraction[],
|
|
issueWorkspace?: { companyId: string; executionWorkspaceId: string | null },
|
|
): Promise<IssueThreadInteraction[]> {
|
|
const guarded = interactions.filter((interaction) =>
|
|
interaction.status === "pending"
|
|
&& interaction.sourceRunId
|
|
&& (interaction.kind === "request_checkbox_confirmation"
|
|
|| (interaction.kind === "request_confirmation"
|
|
// Tool reviews resolve through their own route while the originating
|
|
// run may be waiting for the user's decision.
|
|
&& !interaction.payload.toolAction)),
|
|
);
|
|
if (guarded.length === 0) return interactions;
|
|
const workspace = issueWorkspace ?? await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
companyId: issues.companyId,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: issues.executionWorkspaceId,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(and(
|
|
eq(issues.id, guarded[0].issueId),
|
|
eq(issues.companyId, guarded[0].companyId),
|
|
))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0]);
|
|
if (!workspace?.executionWorkspaceId) return interactions;
|
|
|
|
// Only pending confirmations need checks, once per source run even if that
|
|
// run produced several cards. Historical interactions add no queries.
|
|
const { companyId, executionWorkspaceId } = workspace;
|
|
const sourceRunIds = [...new Set(guarded.map((interaction) => interaction.sourceRunId!))];
|
|
const pendingRunIds = new Set<string>();
|
|
await Promise.all(sourceRunIds.map(async (runId) => {
|
|
if (!await runWorkspaceIsFinalized(db, companyId, executionWorkspaceId, runId)) {
|
|
pendingRunIds.add(runId);
|
|
}
|
|
}));
|
|
const guardedIds = new Set(guarded.map((interaction) => interaction.id));
|
|
return interactions.map((interaction) =>
|
|
guardedIds.has(interaction.id) && pendingRunIds.has(interaction.sourceRunId!)
|
|
? { ...interaction, acceptanceBlocker: "workspace_sync_pending" }
|
|
: interaction,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function getForIssue(
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
) {
|
|
const current = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (
|
|
!current ||
|
|
current.companyId !== issue.companyId ||
|
|
current.issueId !== issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
}
|
|
return (await withAcceptanceReadiness([hydrateInteraction(current)]))[0];
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function assertIssueWorkspaceFinalizedForAccept(args: {
|
|
db: Pick<Db, "select">;
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string };
|
|
sourceRunId: string | null;
|
|
}) {
|
|
if (!args.sourceRunId) return;
|
|
|
|
const executionWorkspaceId = await args.db
|
|
.select({ executionWorkspaceId: issues.executionWorkspaceId })
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, args.issue.id))
|
|
.then(
|
|
(rows: Array<{ executionWorkspaceId: string | null }>) =>
|
|
rows[0]?.executionWorkspaceId ?? null,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
if (!executionWorkspaceId) return;
|
|
|
|
// Block only while the source run's worktree sync-back is genuinely still
|
|
// pending or in flight. A finalize that reached a terminal outcome — including
|
|
// a `failed` sync-back or a stale `running` record left by an ended run — is
|
|
// treated as settled by `runWorkspaceIsFinalized`, so a dead run can no longer
|
|
// wedge this confirmation forever.
|
|
const isFinalized = await runWorkspaceIsFinalized(
|
|
args.db,
|
|
args.issue.companyId,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId,
|
|
args.sourceRunId,
|
|
);
|
|
if (isFinalized) return;
|
|
|
|
throw conflict(
|
|
"Cannot accept interaction: the run that created this interaction has not finished syncing its workspace. " +
|
|
"Retry once the local worktree has finished syncing.",
|
|
{ executionWorkspaceId, sourceRunId: args.sourceRunId },
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function getPendingInteractionForResolution(args: {
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string; status?: string };
|
|
interactionId: string;
|
|
}) {
|
|
const current = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, args.interactionId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
|
|
if (!current) throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
if (
|
|
current.companyId !== args.issue.companyId ||
|
|
current.issueId !== args.issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
}
|
|
if (args.issue.status && isTerminalIssueStatus(args.issue.status)) {
|
|
throw interactionIssueClosedError();
|
|
}
|
|
if (current.status !== "pending") {
|
|
throw interactionTerminalError(current);
|
|
}
|
|
return current;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function assertIssueOpenForInteractionResolution(issue: {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
status?: string;
|
|
}) {
|
|
if (issue.status && isTerminalIssueStatus(issue.status)) {
|
|
throw interactionIssueClosedError();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function acceptRequestConfirmation(args: {
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string };
|
|
current: IssueThreadInteractionRow;
|
|
input: AcceptIssueThreadInteraction;
|
|
actor: InteractionActor;
|
|
mutationOptions?: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions;
|
|
}): Promise<{
|
|
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction;
|
|
continuationIssue: IssueWakeTarget | null;
|
|
}> {
|
|
const expired = await expireStaleRequestConfirmationTarget(db, {
|
|
row: args.current,
|
|
actor: args.actor,
|
|
});
|
|
if (expired)
|
|
throw interactionTerminalError({
|
|
status: expired.status,
|
|
result: expired.result,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const postCommitActivityPublications: ActivityPublication[] = [];
|
|
const result = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx as unknown as Db, args.issue, args.actor);
|
|
await args.mutationOptions?.beforeResolveInTransaction?.(tx);
|
|
// Policy mutations and review transitions use the same issue-row lock,
|
|
// so the authoritative review policy and requester are stable through
|
|
// the verdict write. Terminal issue transitions also lock the issue
|
|
// before expiring linked proposals, so keep issue -> proposal ->
|
|
// interaction as the shared lifecycle order.
|
|
const issueContext = await tx
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: issues.id,
|
|
companyId: issues.companyId,
|
|
status: issues.status,
|
|
executionRunId: issues.executionRunId,
|
|
workMode: issues.workMode,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: issues.assigneeAgentId,
|
|
assigneeUserId: issues.assigneeUserId,
|
|
reviewPolicy: issues.reviewPolicy,
|
|
createdByAgentId: issues.createdByAgentId,
|
|
createdByUserId: issues.createdByUserId,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, args.issue.id))
|
|
.for("update")
|
|
.then((rows: IssueResolutionContext[]) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
|
|
if (!issueContext || issueContext.companyId !== args.issue.companyId) {
|
|
throw notFound("Issue not found");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
await lockLinkedSecretProposal(tx as unknown as Db, args.current);
|
|
|
|
const lockedCurrent = await tx
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, args.current.id))
|
|
.for("update")
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (
|
|
!lockedCurrent ||
|
|
lockedCurrent.companyId !== args.issue.companyId ||
|
|
lockedCurrent.issueId !== args.issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw notFound("Interaction not found");
|
|
}
|
|
if (lockedCurrent.status !== "pending") {
|
|
throw issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
409,
|
|
"interaction_already_resolved",
|
|
"Interaction has already been resolved",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
await assertRequestConfirmationResolutionAllowedUnderLock(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
issueContext,
|
|
lockedCurrent,
|
|
args.actor,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(lockedCurrent);
|
|
const selectedOptionIds =
|
|
interaction.kind === "request_checkbox_confirmation"
|
|
? resolveSelectedCheckboxConfirmationOptions({
|
|
interaction,
|
|
selectedOptionIds: args.input.selectedOptionIds,
|
|
})
|
|
: undefined;
|
|
|
|
const [updated] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "accepted",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "accepted",
|
|
...(selectedOptionIds ? { selectedOptionIds } : {}),
|
|
},
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: args.actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: args.actor.runId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: args.actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, lockedCurrent.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
|
|
if (!updated) {
|
|
throw issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
409,
|
|
"interaction_already_resolved",
|
|
"Interaction has already been resolved",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const acceptedInteraction = hydrateInteraction(updated);
|
|
await args.mutationOptions?.afterResolveInTransaction?.(
|
|
tx,
|
|
acceptedInteraction,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
let continuationIssue: IssueWakeTarget | null = null;
|
|
const acceptedPlanTarget = readAcceptedPlanConfirmationTarget(
|
|
lockedCurrent.payload,
|
|
issueContext.id,
|
|
);
|
|
const acceptedPlanStartsExecution =
|
|
lockedCurrent.kind === "request_confirmation" &&
|
|
acceptedPlanTarget?.issueId === issueContext.id &&
|
|
acceptedPlanTarget.key === "plan" &&
|
|
issueContext.workMode === "planning";
|
|
if (isNativeCompletionReview(lockedCurrent)) {
|
|
const otherPending = await tx.select({ id: issueThreadInteractions.id })
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions).where(and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issueContext.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issueContext.id),
|
|
ne(issueThreadInteractions.id, lockedCurrent.id),
|
|
or(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
and(
|
|
ne(issueThreadInteractions.status, "accepted"),
|
|
sql`${issueThreadInteractions.payload}->'target'->>'key' = 'native_completion_review'`,
|
|
sql`${issueThreadInteractions.payload}->'target'->>'revisionId' = ${JSON.stringify(lockedCurrent.payload)}::jsonb->'target'->>'revisionId'`,
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
)).limit(1);
|
|
// Each explicit reviewer must be able to answer independently. Completing
|
|
// on the first answer would cancel the other pending decisions.
|
|
const completedIssue = otherPending.length > 0 || issueContext.status !== "in_review" ? null : await issueService(db).update(
|
|
args.issue.id,
|
|
{
|
|
status: "done",
|
|
actorAgentId: args.actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
actorUserId: args.actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
},
|
|
tx,
|
|
postCommitActivityPublications,
|
|
);
|
|
if (completedIssue) {
|
|
continuationIssue = {
|
|
id: completedIssue.id,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: completedIssue.assigneeAgentId ?? null,
|
|
assigneeUserId: completedIssue.assigneeUserId ?? null,
|
|
status: completedIssue.status,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (
|
|
shouldReturnAcceptedConfirmationToCreatorAgent({
|
|
issue: issueContext,
|
|
current: lockedCurrent,
|
|
actor: args.actor,
|
|
})
|
|
) {
|
|
const returnStatus =
|
|
issueContext.status === "blocked" ? "blocked" : "todo";
|
|
const returnedIssue = await issueService(db).update(
|
|
args.issue.id,
|
|
{
|
|
status: returnStatus,
|
|
...(acceptedPlanStartsExecution ? { workMode: "standard" } : {}),
|
|
assigneeAgentId: lockedCurrent.createdByAgentId,
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
actorAgentId: args.actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
actorUserId: args.actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
},
|
|
tx,
|
|
postCommitActivityPublications,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
if (returnedIssue) {
|
|
continuationIssue = {
|
|
id: returnedIssue.id,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: returnedIssue.assigneeAgentId ?? null,
|
|
assigneeUserId: returnedIssue.assigneeUserId ?? null,
|
|
status: returnedIssue.status,
|
|
...(acceptedPlanStartsExecution
|
|
? { workMode: returnedIssue.workMode }
|
|
: {}),
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (acceptedPlanStartsExecution) {
|
|
const executionIssue = await issueService(db).update(
|
|
args.issue.id,
|
|
{
|
|
workMode: "standard",
|
|
actorAgentId: args.actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
actorUserId: args.actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
},
|
|
tx,
|
|
postCommitActivityPublications,
|
|
);
|
|
if (executionIssue) {
|
|
continuationIssue = {
|
|
id: executionIssue.id,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: executionIssue.assigneeAgentId ?? null,
|
|
assigneeUserId: executionIssue.assigneeUserId ?? null,
|
|
status: executionIssue.status,
|
|
workMode: executionIssue.workMode,
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
await touchIssue(tx, args.issue.id);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Snapshot the continuation target only after every lifecycle mutation
|
|
// above has settled. Accepted plans and creator-return confirmations can
|
|
// reassign the issue; enqueueing earlier leaves a durable wake addressed
|
|
// to the stale assignee, which the worker must (correctly) discard.
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
acceptedInteraction,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
if (args.actor.systemId) {
|
|
await logActivity(tx as unknown as Db, {
|
|
companyId: args.issue.companyId,
|
|
actorType: "system",
|
|
actorId: args.actor.systemId,
|
|
agentId: null,
|
|
runId: null,
|
|
action: "issue.thread_interaction_accepted",
|
|
entityType: "issue",
|
|
entityId: args.issue.id,
|
|
details: {
|
|
interactionId: lockedCurrent.id,
|
|
interactionKind: lockedCurrent.kind,
|
|
interactionStatus: "accepted",
|
|
resolutionActorKind: "system",
|
|
requestedResolverPolicy: lockedCurrent.requestedResolverPolicy,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: lockedCurrent.effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
...(args.actor.resolutionDetails ?? {}),
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
interaction: acceptedInteraction,
|
|
continuationIssue,
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
const publish = async (committedDb: Db) => {
|
|
for (const publication of postCommitActivityPublications) publishActivity(publication);
|
|
await emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(committedDb, result.interaction);
|
|
};
|
|
if (args.mutationOptions?.deferConfirmationCommitEffects) args.mutationOptions.deferConfirmationCommitEffects(publish);
|
|
else await publish(db);
|
|
return result;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function rejectRequestConfirmation(args: {
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string };
|
|
current: IssueThreadInteractionRow;
|
|
input: RejectIssueThreadInteraction;
|
|
actor: InteractionActor;
|
|
mutationOptions?: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions;
|
|
}): Promise<IssueThreadInteraction> {
|
|
const expired = await expireStaleRequestConfirmationTarget(db, {
|
|
row: args.current,
|
|
actor: args.actor,
|
|
});
|
|
if (expired)
|
|
throw interactionTerminalError({
|
|
status: expired.status,
|
|
result: expired.result,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
args.current,
|
|
) as RequestConfirmationLikeInteraction;
|
|
const reason = args.input.reason?.trim() ?? "";
|
|
if (
|
|
interaction.payload.rejectRequiresReason === true &&
|
|
reason.length === 0
|
|
) {
|
|
throw unprocessable("A decline reason is required for this confirmation");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx as unknown as Db, args.issue, args.actor);
|
|
await args.mutationOptions?.beforeResolveInTransaction?.(tx);
|
|
const issueContext = await tx
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: issues.id,
|
|
companyId: issues.companyId,
|
|
status: issues.status,
|
|
executionRunId: issues.executionRunId,
|
|
workMode: issues.workMode,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: issues.assigneeAgentId,
|
|
assigneeUserId: issues.assigneeUserId,
|
|
reviewPolicy: issues.reviewPolicy,
|
|
createdByAgentId: issues.createdByAgentId,
|
|
createdByUserId: issues.createdByUserId,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, args.issue.id))
|
|
.for("update")
|
|
.then((rows: IssueResolutionContext[]) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (!issueContext || issueContext.companyId !== args.issue.companyId) {
|
|
throw notFound("Issue not found");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Terminal issue transitions expire linked proposals while holding this
|
|
// issue row. Match their issue -> proposal -> interaction order so a
|
|
// close/cancel race cannot invert the first two locks.
|
|
await lockLinkedSecretProposal(tx as unknown as Db, args.current);
|
|
|
|
const lockedCurrent = await tx
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, args.current.id))
|
|
.for("update")
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (
|
|
!lockedCurrent ||
|
|
lockedCurrent.companyId !== args.issue.companyId ||
|
|
lockedCurrent.issueId !== args.issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw notFound("Interaction not found");
|
|
}
|
|
if (lockedCurrent.status !== "pending") {
|
|
throw issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
409,
|
|
"interaction_already_resolved",
|
|
"Interaction has already been resolved",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
await assertRequestConfirmationResolutionAllowedUnderLock(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
issueContext,
|
|
lockedCurrent,
|
|
args.actor,
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
await resolveLinkedSecretProposal(tx as unknown as Db, lockedCurrent, {
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
actor: args.actor,
|
|
reason: reason || null,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const [resolved] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "rejected",
|
|
reason: reason || null,
|
|
...(linkedSecretProposalId(lockedCurrent)
|
|
? {
|
|
secretProposal: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
updatedAt: now.toISOString(),
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
: {}),
|
|
},
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: args.actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: args.actor.runId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: args.actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, lockedCurrent.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
|
|
if (!resolved) {
|
|
throw issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
409,
|
|
"interaction_already_resolved",
|
|
"Interaction has already been resolved",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
const rejectedInteraction = hydrateInteraction(resolved);
|
|
await args.mutationOptions?.afterResolveInTransaction?.(
|
|
tx,
|
|
rejectedInteraction,
|
|
);
|
|
const rejectedPlanNeedsRevision =
|
|
lockedCurrent.kind === "request_confirmation" &&
|
|
readAcceptedPlanConfirmationTarget(
|
|
lockedCurrent.payload,
|
|
issueContext.id,
|
|
)?.key === "plan";
|
|
const shouldResumeReviewedIssue =
|
|
issueContext.status === "in_review" &&
|
|
(lockedCurrent.continuationPolicy === "wake_assignee" ||
|
|
rejectedPlanNeedsRevision);
|
|
if (
|
|
isNativeCompletionReview(lockedCurrent) ||
|
|
shouldResumeReviewedIssue
|
|
) {
|
|
await issueService(db).update(
|
|
args.issue.id,
|
|
{
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: issueContext.assigneeAgentId,
|
|
assigneeUserId: null,
|
|
actorAgentId: args.actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
actorUserId: args.actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
},
|
|
tx,
|
|
);
|
|
} else {
|
|
await touchIssue(tx, args.issue.id);
|
|
}
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
rejectedInteraction,
|
|
);
|
|
return resolved;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const rejected = hydrateInteraction(updated);
|
|
const publish = (committedDb: Db) => emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(committedDb, rejected);
|
|
if (args.mutationOptions?.deferConfirmationCommitEffects) args.mutationOptions.deferConfirmationCommitEffects(publish);
|
|
else await publish(db);
|
|
return rejected;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
getForIssue,
|
|
createConnectionIntent: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string },
|
|
input: {
|
|
payload: ConnectionIntentInteraction["payload"];
|
|
sourceRunId: string;
|
|
sourceIdentityContextId?: string | null;
|
|
addresseeUserId: string;
|
|
idempotencyKey: string;
|
|
},
|
|
) => {
|
|
const payload = connectionIntentPayloadSchema.parse(input.payload);
|
|
const existing = await getIdempotentInteraction({
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
companyId: issue.companyId,
|
|
idempotencyKey: input.idempotencyKey,
|
|
});
|
|
if (existing) {
|
|
if (
|
|
existing.kind !== "connection_intent"
|
|
|| existing.sourceRunId !== input.sourceRunId
|
|
|| existing.addresseeUserId !== input.addresseeUserId
|
|
|| (existing.kind === "connection_intent"
|
|
? (connectionIntentPayloadSchema.parse(existing.payload).serviceSlug !== payload.serviceSlug || connectionIntentPayloadSchema.parse(existing.payload).purpose !== payload.purpose || !isDeepStrictEqual(connectionIntentPayloadSchema.parse(existing.payload).accessRequest, payload.accessRequest))
|
|
: !isDeepStrictEqual(existing.payload, payload))
|
|
) {
|
|
throw conflict(
|
|
"Interaction idempotency key already exists for a different request",
|
|
{
|
|
idempotencyKey: input.idempotencyKey,
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(existing) as ConnectionIntentInteraction;
|
|
await enqueueIssueInteractionChatPublications(db, interaction);
|
|
return interaction;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let inserted = false;
|
|
const created = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
const issueRow = await tx
|
|
.select({ status: issues.status, assigneeAgentId: issues.assigneeAgentId })
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(eq(issues.id, issue.id), eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId)),
|
|
)
|
|
.for("update")
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (!issueRow || isTerminalIssueStatus(issueRow.status) || issueRow.assigneeAgentId !== payload.requestingAgentId) {
|
|
throw conflict("Cannot create an interaction on a closed issue");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Serialize on the task so retries and later runs share the same live card.
|
|
const pending = await tx.select().from(issueThreadInteractions).where(and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.kind, "connection_intent"),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.createdByAgentId, payload.requestingAgentId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.addresseeUserId, input.addresseeUserId),
|
|
));
|
|
const reusable = pending.find((candidate) =>
|
|
connectionIntentPayloadSchema.parse(candidate.payload).serviceSlug === payload.serviceSlug && connectionIntentPayloadSchema.parse(candidate.payload).purpose === payload.purpose && isDeepStrictEqual(connectionIntentPayloadSchema.parse(candidate.payload).accessRequest, payload.accessRequest));
|
|
if (reusable) {
|
|
await enqueueIssueInteractionChatPublications(tx as unknown as Db, hydrateInteraction(reusable));
|
|
return reusable;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const [sourceRun] = await tx.select({ context: heartbeatRuns.contextSnapshot }).from(heartbeatRuns)
|
|
.where(and(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, input.sourceRunId), eq(heartbeatRuns.companyId, issue.companyId)));
|
|
if (!sourceRun) throw unprocessable("Interaction source run is unavailable");
|
|
const originCommentIds = await currentContinuationOrigins(tx as unknown as Db, issue.companyId, issue.id, sourceRun.context);
|
|
const [row] = await tx
|
|
.insert(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.values({
|
|
companyId: issue.companyId,
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
kind: "connection_intent",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
requestedResolverPolicy: "human_only",
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: "human_only",
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance: "explicit",
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicySource: "governed_action",
|
|
idempotencyKey: input.idempotencyKey,
|
|
sourceRunId: input.sourceRunId,
|
|
originCommentIds,
|
|
sourceIdentityContextId: input.sourceIdentityContextId ?? null,
|
|
title: payload.accessRequest ? `Grant ${payload.serviceName} access to ${payload.requestingAgentName}?` : `Connect ${payload.serviceName}`,
|
|
summary: `${payload.requestingAgentName} needs this connection to continue.`,
|
|
createdByAgentId: payload.requestingAgentId,
|
|
addresseeUserId: input.addresseeUserId,
|
|
payload,
|
|
})
|
|
.returning();
|
|
|
|
const olderPending = await tx
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.kind, "connection_intent"),
|
|
eq(
|
|
issueThreadInteractions.createdByAgentId,
|
|
payload.requestingAgentId,
|
|
),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
ne(issueThreadInteractions.id, row.id),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
const supersededIds = olderPending
|
|
.filter((candidate) => {
|
|
const candidatePayload = connectionIntentPayloadSchema.safeParse(
|
|
candidate.payload,
|
|
);
|
|
return (
|
|
candidatePayload.success &&
|
|
candidatePayload.data.serviceSlug === payload.serviceSlug && candidatePayload.data.purpose === payload.purpose
|
|
);
|
|
})
|
|
.map((candidate) => candidate.id);
|
|
if (supersededIds.length > 0) {
|
|
await tx
|
|
.delete(toolOauthStates)
|
|
.where(inArray(toolOauthStates.interactionId, supersededIds));
|
|
const superseded = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "superseded",
|
|
supersededByInteractionId: row.id,
|
|
},
|
|
resolvedAt: now(),
|
|
updatedAt: now(),
|
|
})
|
|
.where(inArray(issueThreadInteractions.id, supersededIds))
|
|
.returning();
|
|
for (const previous of superseded) {
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(tx as unknown as Db, hydrateInteraction(previous));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
await touchIssue(tx, issue.id);
|
|
inserted = true;
|
|
await enqueueIssueInteractionChatPublications(tx as unknown as Db, hydrateInteraction(row));
|
|
await notifyDeliveryWork(tx, DELIVERY_QUEUES.connection);
|
|
return row;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(created) as ConnectionIntentInteraction;
|
|
if (inserted) emitInteractionCreatedTelemetry({
|
|
interactionKind: "connection_intent",
|
|
usedDeprecatedResolverPolicyAlias: false,
|
|
});
|
|
return interaction;
|
|
},
|
|
updateConnectionIntentPhase: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
phase: ConnectionIntentInteraction["payload"]["phase"],
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
) => {
|
|
const current = await getPendingInteractionForResolution({
|
|
issue,
|
|
interactionId,
|
|
});
|
|
if (current.kind !== "connection_intent") {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"Only connection_intent interactions have a connection phase",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
assertInteractionResolutionAllowed(current, actor);
|
|
const payload = connectionIntentPayloadSchema.parse(current.payload);
|
|
const [updated] = await db
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({ payload: { ...payload, phase }, updatedAt: now() })
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (!updated) throw interactionAlreadyResolvedError();
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
return hydrateInteraction(updated) as ConnectionIntentInteraction;
|
|
},
|
|
resolveConnectionIntent: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
resultInput: ConnectionIntentInteraction["result"] extends infer T
|
|
? NonNullable<T>
|
|
: never,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
mutationOptions: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions = {},
|
|
) => {
|
|
const result = connectionIntentResultSchema.parse(resultInput);
|
|
const current = await getPendingInteractionForResolution({
|
|
issue,
|
|
interactionId,
|
|
});
|
|
if (current.kind !== "connection_intent") {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"Only connection_intent interactions can be resolved by this operation",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (!actor.userId)
|
|
throw forbidden("Connection intents require a human resolver");
|
|
assertInteractionResolutionAllowed(current, actor);
|
|
const status =
|
|
result.outcome === "connected"
|
|
? "accepted"
|
|
: result.outcome === "declined"
|
|
? "rejected"
|
|
: "expired";
|
|
const resolvedAt = now();
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await mutationOptions.beforeResolveInTransaction?.(tx);
|
|
const [row] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status,
|
|
result,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId,
|
|
resolvedAt,
|
|
updatedAt: resolvedAt,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (!row) throw interactionAlreadyResolvedError();
|
|
if (status === "accepted" || status === "rejected") {
|
|
await notifyDeliveryWork(tx, DELIVERY_QUEUES.connection);
|
|
await tx.insert(connectionIntentDeliveries).values({ interactionId, companyId: issue.companyId }).onConflictDoNothing();
|
|
}
|
|
await mutationOptions.afterResolveInTransaction?.(tx, hydrateInteraction(row));
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(tx as unknown as Db, hydrateInteraction(row));
|
|
return row;
|
|
});
|
|
if (!updated) throw interactionAlreadyResolvedError();
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
updated,
|
|
) as ConnectionIntentInteraction;
|
|
await emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(db, interaction);
|
|
return interaction;
|
|
},
|
|
sweepMergedPullRequestConfirmations: async (
|
|
mergedHints: Array<{
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
owner: string;
|
|
repo: string;
|
|
number: number;
|
|
}> = [],
|
|
) => {
|
|
const rows = await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
interaction: issueThreadInteractions,
|
|
issue: {
|
|
id: issues.id,
|
|
companyId: issues.companyId,
|
|
projectId: issues.projectId,
|
|
goalId: issues.goalId,
|
|
status: issues.status,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: issues.assigneeAgentId,
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.innerJoin(issues, eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issues.id))
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.kind, "request_confirmation"),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const candidates = rows.flatMap((row) => {
|
|
const references = getMergeConfirmationPullRequestReferences(
|
|
row.interaction,
|
|
);
|
|
return references.length > 0 ? [{ ...row, references }] : [];
|
|
});
|
|
if (candidates.length === 0) {
|
|
return { checked: rows.length, candidates: 0, accepted: 0, woken: 0 };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const candidateIds = candidates.map(({ interaction }) => interaction.id);
|
|
const linkedToolActions = await db
|
|
.select({ interactionId: toolActionRequests.interactionId })
|
|
.from(toolActionRequests)
|
|
.where(inArray(toolActionRequests.interactionId, candidateIds));
|
|
const toolActionInteractionIds = new Set(
|
|
linkedToolActions
|
|
.map((row) => row.interactionId)
|
|
.filter((value): value is string => Boolean(value)),
|
|
);
|
|
const eligible = candidates.filter(
|
|
({ interaction }) => !toolActionInteractionIds.has(interaction.id),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const checkedAt = now().getTime();
|
|
const cacheTtlMs = opts.pullRequestCacheTtlMs ?? 5 * 60 * 1000;
|
|
for (const hint of mergedHints) {
|
|
const key = `${hint.companyId}:${hint.owner.toLowerCase()}/${hint.repo.toLowerCase()}#${hint.number}`;
|
|
setBoundedPullRequestCacheEntry(pullRequestStateCache, key, {
|
|
state: "merged",
|
|
checkedAt,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
const uniqueReferences = new Map<
|
|
string,
|
|
{
|
|
key: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
reference: GitHubPullRequestReference;
|
|
}
|
|
>();
|
|
for (const candidate of eligible) {
|
|
for (const reference of candidate.references) {
|
|
const key = `${candidate.issue.companyId}:${reference.owner.toLowerCase()}/${reference.repo.toLowerCase()}#${reference.number}`;
|
|
const cached = pullRequestStateCache.get(key);
|
|
if (cached && checkedAt - cached.checkedAt < cacheTtlMs) continue;
|
|
uniqueReferences.set(key, {
|
|
key,
|
|
companyId: candidate.issue.companyId,
|
|
reference,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const refreshedStates = await resolvePullRequestStates([
|
|
...uniqueReferences.values(),
|
|
]);
|
|
for (const [key, state] of refreshedStates) {
|
|
setBoundedPullRequestCacheEntry(pullRequestStateCache, key, {
|
|
state,
|
|
checkedAt,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let accepted = 0;
|
|
let woken = 0;
|
|
for (const candidate of eligible) {
|
|
const allMerged = candidate.references.every((reference) => {
|
|
const key = `${candidate.issue.companyId}:${reference.owner.toLowerCase()}/${reference.repo.toLowerCase()}#${reference.number}`;
|
|
return pullRequestStateCache.get(key)?.state === "merged";
|
|
});
|
|
if (!allMerged) continue;
|
|
|
|
let resolved: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof acceptRequestConfirmation>>;
|
|
try {
|
|
resolved = await acceptRequestConfirmation({
|
|
issue: candidate.issue,
|
|
current: candidate.interaction,
|
|
input: {},
|
|
actor: {
|
|
systemId: "system:pr-merged",
|
|
resolutionDetails: {
|
|
source: "merged_pull_request_sweep",
|
|
pullRequests: candidate.references.map(
|
|
(reference) =>
|
|
`${reference.owner}/${reference.repo}#${reference.number}`,
|
|
),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
if (
|
|
error &&
|
|
typeof error === "object" &&
|
|
"status" in error &&
|
|
error.status === 409
|
|
)
|
|
continue;
|
|
throw error;
|
|
}
|
|
if (resolved.interaction.status !== "accepted") continue;
|
|
accepted += 1;
|
|
|
|
const wakeIssue = resolved.continuationIssue ?? candidate.issue;
|
|
const shouldWake =
|
|
resolved.interaction.continuationPolicy === "wake_assignee" ||
|
|
resolved.interaction.continuationPolicy === "wake_assignee_on_accept";
|
|
if (
|
|
!opts.wakeup ||
|
|
!shouldWake ||
|
|
!wakeIssue.assigneeAgentId ||
|
|
isTerminalIssueStatus(wakeIssue.status)
|
|
) {
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
await opts.wakeup(wakeIssue.assigneeAgentId, {
|
|
source: "automation",
|
|
triggerDetail: "system",
|
|
reason: "issue_commented",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
issueId: wakeIssue.id,
|
|
interactionId: resolved.interaction.id,
|
|
interactionKind: resolved.interaction.kind,
|
|
interactionStatus: resolved.interaction.status,
|
|
sourceCommentId: resolved.interaction.sourceCommentId ?? null,
|
|
sourceRunId: resolved.interaction.sourceRunId ?? null,
|
|
mutation: "interaction",
|
|
resolutionSource: "merged_pull_request_sweep",
|
|
},
|
|
idempotencyKey: `interaction:${resolved.interaction.id}:accepted`,
|
|
// A merged-PR confirmation may already be visible in an external
|
|
// provider conversation. Keep its continuation causally isolated
|
|
// from unrelated queued chat/internal work on the same task.
|
|
allowRunCoalescing: false,
|
|
requestedByActorType: "system",
|
|
requestedByActorId: "system:pr-merged",
|
|
contextSnapshot: {
|
|
issueId: wakeIssue.id,
|
|
taskId: wakeIssue.id,
|
|
interactionId: resolved.interaction.id,
|
|
interactionKind: resolved.interaction.kind,
|
|
interactionStatus: resolved.interaction.status,
|
|
wakeReason: "issue_commented",
|
|
source: "merged_pull_request_sweep",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
woken += 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
checked: rows.length,
|
|
candidates: eligible.length,
|
|
accepted,
|
|
woken,
|
|
};
|
|
},
|
|
listForIssue: async (issueId: string) => {
|
|
const [rows, issue] = await Promise.all([
|
|
db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issueId))
|
|
.orderBy(
|
|
asc(issueThreadInteractions.createdAt),
|
|
asc(issueThreadInteractions.id),
|
|
),
|
|
db
|
|
.select({
|
|
status: issues.status,
|
|
companyId: issues.companyId,
|
|
executionWorkspaceId: issues.executionWorkspaceId,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(eq(issues.id, issueId))
|
|
.then((issueRows) => issueRows[0]),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const interactions = rows.map((row) =>
|
|
hydrateInteraction(
|
|
issue &&
|
|
isTerminalIssueStatus(issue.status) &&
|
|
row.status === "pending"
|
|
? {
|
|
...row,
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: buildAdministrativeOutcomeResult(row, "issue_closed"),
|
|
resolvedAt: row.updatedAt,
|
|
}
|
|
: row,
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
return withAcceptanceReadiness(interactions, issue);
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
getById: async (interactionId: string) => {
|
|
const row = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
|
|
return row ? (await withAcceptanceReadiness([hydrateInteraction(row)]))[0] : null;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
recordSecretProposalExecutionResult: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
proposalId: string,
|
|
execution: { status: "executed" | "failed"; errorCode?: string | null },
|
|
) => {
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
// Verdict and terminal-transition paths lock issue -> proposal ->
|
|
// interaction. Take the same order before recording the receipt so a
|
|
// concurrent rejection or issue close cannot deadlock here.
|
|
const lockedIssue = await tx
|
|
.select({ id: issues.id })
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(eq(issues.id, issue.id), eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId)),
|
|
)
|
|
.for("update")
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (!lockedIssue) throw notFound("Issue not found");
|
|
|
|
const proposal = await tx
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(companySecretProposals)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.id, proposalId),
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.for("update")
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
const current = await tx
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId))
|
|
.for("update")
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (
|
|
!current ||
|
|
current.companyId !== issue.companyId ||
|
|
current.issueId !== issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw notFound("Interaction not found");
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
!proposal ||
|
|
proposal.interactionId !== interactionId ||
|
|
current.status !== "accepted" ||
|
|
linkedSecretProposalId(current) !== proposalId
|
|
) {
|
|
throw conflict(
|
|
"Secret proposal interaction is not awaiting an execution result",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const payload =
|
|
current.payload &&
|
|
typeof current.payload === "object" &&
|
|
!Array.isArray(current.payload)
|
|
? (current.payload as unknown as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
: {};
|
|
const secretProposalPayload =
|
|
payload.secretProposal &&
|
|
typeof payload.secretProposal === "object" &&
|
|
!Array.isArray(payload.secretProposal)
|
|
? (payload.secretProposal as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
: {};
|
|
const proposalAlreadyExecuted =
|
|
proposal.status === "approved" &&
|
|
proposal.appliedBindingConfigPath ===
|
|
secretProposalPayload.configPath;
|
|
const executionStatus = proposalAlreadyExecuted
|
|
? "executed"
|
|
: execution.status;
|
|
if (executionStatus === "failed" && proposal.status === "pending") {
|
|
const resolutionReason = `Interaction acceptance failed: ${execution.errorCode ?? "secret_proposal_execution_failed"}`;
|
|
await tx
|
|
.update(companySecretProposals)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
resolvedByUserId: current.resolvedByUserId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
resolutionReason,
|
|
valueCiphertext: null,
|
|
ciphertextScrubbedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.id, proposal.id),
|
|
eq(companySecretProposals.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
await logActivity(tx as unknown as Db, {
|
|
companyId: issue.companyId,
|
|
actorType: current.resolvedByUserId ? "user" : "system",
|
|
actorId: current.resolvedByUserId ?? "system",
|
|
action: "secret.proposal.rejected",
|
|
entityType: "company_secret_proposal",
|
|
entityId: proposal.id,
|
|
agentId: proposal.proposedByAgentId,
|
|
runId: proposal.originRunId,
|
|
details: {
|
|
ciphertextScrubbed: true,
|
|
issueId: proposal.originIssueId,
|
|
interactionId: current.id,
|
|
reason: resolutionReason,
|
|
executionFailed: true,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
const result =
|
|
current.result &&
|
|
typeof current.result === "object" &&
|
|
!Array.isArray(current.result)
|
|
? (current.result as unknown as Record<string, unknown>)
|
|
: {};
|
|
const [row] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
result: {
|
|
...result,
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "accepted",
|
|
secretProposal: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
status: executionStatus,
|
|
errorCode:
|
|
executionStatus === "failed"
|
|
? (execution.errorCode ?? null)
|
|
: null,
|
|
updatedAt: now.toISOString(),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, current.id))
|
|
.returning();
|
|
await touchIssue(tx, issue.id);
|
|
return row;
|
|
});
|
|
return hydrateInteraction(updated);
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
cancelPendingForDeletedAddressee: async (
|
|
companyId: string,
|
|
addresseeAgentId: string,
|
|
) => {
|
|
const rows = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.addresseeAgentId, addresseeAgentId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
if (rows.length === 0) return [];
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const cancelled: IssueThreadInteraction[] = [];
|
|
for (const row of rows) {
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
const [resolved] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "cancelled",
|
|
result: buildAdministrativeOutcomeResult(
|
|
row,
|
|
"addressee_deleted",
|
|
"Cancelled because the addressed agent was deleted",
|
|
),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, row.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (!resolved) return null;
|
|
const cancelledInteraction = hydrateInteraction(resolved);
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
cancelledInteraction,
|
|
);
|
|
return cancelledInteraction;
|
|
});
|
|
if (updated) cancelled.push(updated);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const issueId of new Set(
|
|
cancelled.map((interaction) => interaction.issueId),
|
|
)) {
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issueId);
|
|
}
|
|
await emitResolvedInteractionsTelemetry(db, cancelled);
|
|
return cancelled;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
sweepSupersededPendingRequestConfirmations: async () => {
|
|
const rows = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.kind, "request_confirmation"),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
isNotNull(issueThreadInteractions.createdByAgentId),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.orderBy(
|
|
asc(issueThreadInteractions.companyId),
|
|
asc(issueThreadInteractions.issueId),
|
|
asc(issueThreadInteractions.kind),
|
|
asc(issueThreadInteractions.createdByAgentId),
|
|
desc(issueThreadInteractions.createdAt),
|
|
desc(issueThreadInteractions.id),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const newestByGroup = new Map<string, IssueThreadInteractionRow>();
|
|
const supersededRows: Array<{
|
|
row: IssueThreadInteractionRow;
|
|
replacementInteractionId: string;
|
|
}> = [];
|
|
for (const row of rows) {
|
|
if (!row.createdByAgentId) continue;
|
|
const groupKey = `${row.companyId}:${row.issueId}:${row.kind}:${row.createdByAgentId}`;
|
|
const newest = newestByGroup.get(groupKey);
|
|
if (!newest) {
|
|
newestByGroup.set(groupKey, row);
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
supersededRows.push({ row, replacementInteractionId: newest.id });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (supersededRows.length === 0) return { expired: 0 };
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const expired: IssueThreadInteraction[] = [];
|
|
for (const { row, replacementInteractionId } of supersededRows) {
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
const [updatedRow] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: buildSupersededByNewerRequestResult(
|
|
replacementInteractionId,
|
|
),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, row.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (!updatedRow) return null;
|
|
await resolveLinkedToolActionRequests(tx, updatedRow, {
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
fromStatuses: ["pending", "approved"],
|
|
actor: {},
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
hydrateInteraction(updatedRow),
|
|
);
|
|
return updatedRow;
|
|
});
|
|
if (!updated) continue;
|
|
expired.push(hydrateInteraction(updated));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (expired.length > 0) {
|
|
for (const issueId of new Set(
|
|
expired.map((interaction) => interaction.issueId),
|
|
)) {
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issueId);
|
|
}
|
|
await emitResolvedInteractionsTelemetry(db, expired);
|
|
}
|
|
return { expired: expired.length };
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
create: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string },
|
|
input: CreateIssueThreadInteractionInput,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
options: CreateInteractionOptions = {},
|
|
) => {
|
|
const data = normalizeCreateInteractionInput(
|
|
createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse(input),
|
|
);
|
|
// Chat ownership is server-owned and immutable. Ordinary human questions
|
|
// must not depend on a model copying an opaque user identity correctly.
|
|
let defaultAddresseeUserId: string | null = null;
|
|
if (data.kind === "ask_user_questions" && !data.addresseeAgentId) {
|
|
const [conversation] = await db
|
|
.select({ agentId: issues.conversationAgentId, userId: issues.conversationUserId })
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(and(eq(issues.id, issue.id), eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId)));
|
|
if (conversation?.agentId && conversation.userId) {
|
|
defaultAddresseeUserId = conversation.userId;
|
|
if (data.addresseeUserId && data.addresseeUserId !== defaultAddresseeUserId) {
|
|
throw unprocessable("Chat questions must address the conversation owner; omit addresseeUserId", {
|
|
code: "interaction_chat_addressee_mismatch",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
data.addresseeUserId = defaultAddresseeUserId;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
const usedDeprecatedResolverPolicyAlias =
|
|
data.resolverPolicy === "board_or_agents" ||
|
|
data.resolverPolicy === "board_only";
|
|
const governance = await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
interactionResolverGovernance:
|
|
companies.interactionResolverGovernance,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(companies)
|
|
.where(eq(companies.id, issue.companyId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0]?.interactionResolverGovernance ?? {});
|
|
const policy = resolveInteractionPolicy({
|
|
kind: data.kind,
|
|
requested: data.resolverPolicy,
|
|
governance,
|
|
hasToolAction:
|
|
data.kind === "request_confirmation" &&
|
|
data.payload.toolAction !== undefined,
|
|
hasSecretProposal:
|
|
data.kind === "request_confirmation" &&
|
|
data.payload.secretProposal !== undefined,
|
|
});
|
|
const normalizedData = {
|
|
...data,
|
|
resolverPolicy: policy.requestedResolverPolicy,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
if (normalizedData.addresseeAgentId && normalizedData.addresseeUserId) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"An issue-thread interaction cannot address both an agent and a user",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (normalizedData.addresseeAgentId) {
|
|
if (normalizedData.addresseeAgentId === actor.agentId) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"Agents cannot address issue-thread interactions to themselves",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
normalizedData.kind === "request_confirmation" &&
|
|
normalizedData.payload.toolAction !== undefined
|
|
) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"Tool-action confirmations cannot be addressed to agents",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
normalizedData.kind === "request_confirmation" &&
|
|
normalizedData.payload.secretProposal !== undefined
|
|
) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"Secret-proposal confirmations cannot be addressed to agents",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
const addressee = await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: agents.id,
|
|
companyId: agents.companyId,
|
|
name: agents.name,
|
|
reportsTo: agents.reportsTo,
|
|
status: agents.status,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(agents)
|
|
.where(eq(agents.id, normalizedData.addresseeAgentId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (!addressee || addressee.companyId !== issue.companyId) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"addresseeAgentId must belong to the same company",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
const invokability = await evaluateAgentInvokabilityFromDb(
|
|
db,
|
|
addressee,
|
|
);
|
|
if (!invokability.invokable) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"addresseeAgentId must reference an invokable agent",
|
|
{
|
|
reason: invokability.reason,
|
|
...invokability.details,
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (normalizedData.idempotencyKey) {
|
|
const existing = await getIdempotentInteraction({
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
companyId: issue.companyId,
|
|
idempotencyKey: normalizedData.idempotencyKey,
|
|
});
|
|
if (existing) {
|
|
if (!isEquivalentCreateRequest(existing, normalizedData, actor, defaultAddresseeUserId)) {
|
|
throw conflict(
|
|
"Interaction idempotency key already exists for a different request",
|
|
{
|
|
idempotencyKey: normalizedData.idempotencyKey,
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(existing);
|
|
await enqueueIssueInteractionChatPublications(db, interaction);
|
|
return interaction;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (data.sourceCommentId) {
|
|
const sourceComment = await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
companyId: issueComments.companyId,
|
|
issueId: issueComments.issueId,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issueComments)
|
|
.where(eq(issueComments.id, data.sourceCommentId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (
|
|
!sourceComment ||
|
|
sourceComment.companyId !== issue.companyId ||
|
|
sourceComment.issueId !== issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"sourceCommentId must belong to the same issue and company",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let originCommentIds: string[] = data.sourceCommentId ? [data.sourceCommentId] : [];
|
|
let sourceIdentityContextId: string | null = null;
|
|
let sourceRunContext: Record<string, unknown> | null = null;
|
|
let sourceRunCreatedAt: Date | null = null;
|
|
if (data.sourceRunId) {
|
|
const sourceRun = await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
contextSnapshot: heartbeatRuns.contextSnapshot,
|
|
companyId: heartbeatRuns.companyId,
|
|
agentId: heartbeatRuns.agentId,
|
|
nativeIssueId: heartbeatRuns.nativeIssueId,
|
|
createdAt: heartbeatRuns.createdAt,
|
|
activeIdentityContextId: heartbeatRuns.activeIdentityContextId,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(heartbeatRuns)
|
|
.where(eq(heartbeatRuns.id, data.sourceRunId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (!sourceRun || sourceRun.companyId !== issue.companyId) {
|
|
throw unprocessable("sourceRunId must belong to the same company");
|
|
}
|
|
if (data.kind === "ask_user_questions") {
|
|
if (actor.agentId && sourceRun.agentId !== actor.agentId) {
|
|
throw unprocessable("sourceRunId must belong to the creating agent");
|
|
}
|
|
const snapshot = sourceRun.contextSnapshot ?? {};
|
|
const boundIssueIds = [
|
|
sourceRun.nativeIssueId,
|
|
snapshot.issueId,
|
|
snapshot.taskId,
|
|
].filter((value): value is string => typeof value === "string" && value.length > 0);
|
|
if (boundIssueIds.some((boundIssueId) => boundIssueId !== issue.id)) {
|
|
throw unprocessable("sourceRunId must belong to the same issue");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
sourceRunContext = sourceRun.contextSnapshot;
|
|
sourceRunCreatedAt = sourceRun.createdAt;
|
|
originCommentIds = [...new Set([...originCommentIds, ...await currentContinuationOrigins(db, issue.companyId, issue.id, sourceRun.contextSnapshot)])];
|
|
sourceIdentityContextId = actor.identityContextId ?? sourceRun.activeIdentityContextId;
|
|
if (sourceIdentityContextId) {
|
|
const [origin] = await db.select({id: runIdentityContexts.id}).from(runIdentityContexts).where(and(
|
|
eq(runIdentityContexts.id, sourceIdentityContextId), eq(runIdentityContexts.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(runIdentityContexts.runId, data.sourceRunId), eq(runIdentityContexts.status, "accepted"),
|
|
));
|
|
if (!origin) throw unprocessable("Interaction execution identity is unavailable");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const requiresCurrentTarget =
|
|
data.kind === "request_confirmation" ||
|
|
data.kind === "request_checkbox_confirmation" ||
|
|
data.kind === "request_item_verdicts";
|
|
|
|
let created: IssueThreadInteractionRow;
|
|
let superseded: IssueThreadInteractionRow[] = [];
|
|
try {
|
|
// A terminal issue must not regain pending actionable cards. FOR UPDATE
|
|
// on the issue row serializes this insert both against terminal status
|
|
// transitions and against concurrent confirmations on the same issue.
|
|
// Idempotent reuse above stays allowed so retries of a pre-close
|
|
// create keep returning the (by now expired) original.
|
|
const result = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx as unknown as Db, issue, actor);
|
|
const [issueRow] = await tx
|
|
.select({ status: issues.status, assigneeAgentId: issues.assigneeAgentId, assigneeUserId: issues.assigneeUserId, conversationAgentId: issues.conversationAgentId, conversationUserId: issues.conversationUserId })
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issues.id, issue.id),
|
|
eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.for("update");
|
|
if (!issueRow || isTerminalIssueStatus(issueRow.status)) {
|
|
throw conflict("Cannot create an interaction on a closed issue");
|
|
}
|
|
if (data.addresseeUserId) {
|
|
const [user] = await tx.select({ id: authUsers.id }).from(authUsers)
|
|
.where(eq(authUsers.id, data.addresseeUserId));
|
|
const cloudManaged = isCloudManagedInstance();
|
|
// No-login installs have an implicit board, which need not have an
|
|
// auth row. Never infer this authority in authenticated/Cloud mode.
|
|
const localImplicit = data.addresseeUserId === "local-board"
|
|
&& !cloudManaged && resolveDeploymentMode() === "local_trusted";
|
|
// Use the normal board mutation policy, including viewer restrictions,
|
|
// local/instance-admin eligibility and Cloud's no-stale-admin rule.
|
|
const decision = user || localImplicit ? await authorizationService(tx).decide({
|
|
actor: {
|
|
type: "board",
|
|
userId: data.addresseeUserId,
|
|
source: localImplicit ? "local_implicit" : cloudManaged ? "cloud_tenant" : "session",
|
|
},
|
|
action: "issue:mutate",
|
|
resource: { type: "issue", companyId: issue.companyId, issueId: issue.id, ...issueRow },
|
|
}) : null;
|
|
if (!decision?.allowed) {
|
|
throw unprocessable("addresseeUserId must identify a user authorized to respond in this company", {
|
|
code: "interaction_addressee_user_unavailable",
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (
|
|
data.kind === "ask_user_questions" &&
|
|
sourceRunContext &&
|
|
sourceRunCreatedAt
|
|
) {
|
|
const delivered = deliveredContinuationCommentIds(sourceRunContext);
|
|
if (delivered.known) {
|
|
const newerHumanComments = await tx
|
|
.select({ id: issueComments.id })
|
|
.from(issueComments)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueComments.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueComments.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
eq(issueComments.authorType, "user"),
|
|
isNotNull(issueComments.authorUserId),
|
|
ne(issueComments.authorUserId, "board-concierge"),
|
|
isNull(issueComments.createdByRunId),
|
|
eq(issueComments.origin, "comment"),
|
|
isNull(issueComments.deletedAt),
|
|
gte(issueComments.createdAt, sourceRunCreatedAt),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
const undelivered = newerHumanComments.filter(
|
|
(comment) => !delivered.ids.has(comment.id),
|
|
);
|
|
if (undelivered.length > 0) {
|
|
throw conflict(
|
|
"New user comments arrived after this run's context; continue after queued comments are delivered",
|
|
{
|
|
reason: "newer_comment_not_delivered",
|
|
commentIds: undelivered.map((comment) => comment.id),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// Validate the plan/document confirmation target inside the same
|
|
// transaction (locking the document row) so the latest-revision check
|
|
// is atomic with the insert below. A concurrent revision publish can no
|
|
// longer slip between the check and the insert to leave a confirmation
|
|
// pointing at a stale revision.
|
|
if (requiresCurrentTarget) {
|
|
await assertRequestConfirmationTargetIsCurrent(tx, {
|
|
companyId: issue.companyId,
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
target: data.payload.target ?? null,
|
|
lockForUpdate: true,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
// An unverified phone caller has no authenticated human identity.
|
|
// Their clarifications use the ordinary task-comment/follow-up queue;
|
|
// a protected native question would otherwise wait indefinitely.
|
|
if (data.kind === "ask_user_questions" && !actor.userId) {
|
|
const [guest] = await tx.select({id: chatVoiceSessions.id}).from(chatVoiceSessions)
|
|
.where(and(eq(chatVoiceSessions.companyId, issue.companyId), eq(chatVoiceSessions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
eq(chatVoiceSessions.callerAuthority, "guest_intake"))).limit(1);
|
|
if (guest) throw unprocessable("Ask this unverified caller a clarification in a task comment; submit_request will deliver their spoken follow-up. Protected human-input questions require authenticated access.", {code: "voice_guest_use_task_comment"});
|
|
}
|
|
const [row] = await tx
|
|
.insert(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.values({
|
|
companyId: issue.companyId,
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
kind: data.kind,
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
continuationPolicy: data.continuationPolicy,
|
|
requestedResolverPolicy: policy.requestedResolverPolicy,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: policy.effectiveResolverPolicy,
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance: policy.resolverPolicyProvenance,
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicySource:
|
|
policy.effectiveResolverPolicySource,
|
|
idempotencyKey: data.idempotencyKey ?? null,
|
|
originCommentIds,
|
|
sourceCommentId: data.sourceCommentId ?? null,
|
|
sourceRunId: data.sourceRunId ?? null,
|
|
sourceIdentityContextId,
|
|
title: data.title ?? null,
|
|
summary: data.summary ?? null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
addresseeAgentId: data.addresseeAgentId ?? null,
|
|
addresseeUserId: data.addresseeUserId ?? null,
|
|
createdByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
payload: data.payload,
|
|
})
|
|
.returning();
|
|
|
|
if (row.addresseeAgentId || row.addresseeUserId) {
|
|
const [privacyIssue] = await tx.select().from(issues).where(and(eq(issues.id, issue.id), eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId)));
|
|
await ensureAssignmentIssueAccessGrant(tx, { ...privacyIssue!,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: row.addresseeAgentId, assigneeUserId: row.addresseeUserId,
|
|
}, null, { agentId: actor.agentId, userId: actor.userId });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// An agent replacing its own still-pending card supersedes the older
|
|
// one so the thread never accumulates stale sibling cards. This covers
|
|
// request_confirmation drafts and ordinary task questions. Agent Chat
|
|
// questions remain answerable in history even when another is asked.
|
|
// Scoped to the same agent + issue + kind; other actors are untouched.
|
|
const canSupersedeSiblingCards =
|
|
options.supersedePendingSiblingInteractions !== false &&
|
|
((data.kind === "request_confirmation" &&
|
|
data.payload.toolAction === undefined &&
|
|
data.payload.secretProposal === undefined) ||
|
|
(data.kind === "ask_user_questions" && (!issueRow.conversationAgentId || !issueRow.conversationUserId)));
|
|
if (!actor.agentId || !canSupersedeSiblingCards) {
|
|
await enqueueIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
hydrateInteraction(row),
|
|
);
|
|
return { row, supersededRows: [] };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const supersededResult =
|
|
data.kind === "ask_user_questions"
|
|
? buildSupersededByNewerInteractionResult(row.id)
|
|
: buildSupersededByNewerRequestResult(row.id);
|
|
const supersededRows = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: supersededResult,
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: actor.agentId,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.kind, data.kind),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.createdByAgentId, actor.agentId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
ne(issueThreadInteractions.id, row.id),
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
for (const supersededRow of supersededRows) {
|
|
await resolveLinkedToolActionRequests(tx, supersededRow, {
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
fromStatuses: ["pending", "approved"],
|
|
actor,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
await cancelPendingIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
{
|
|
companyId: issue.companyId,
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
interactionIds: supersededRows.map((candidate) => candidate.id),
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
for (const supersededRow of supersededRows) {
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
hydrateInteraction(supersededRow),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
await enqueueIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
hydrateInteraction(row),
|
|
);
|
|
return { row, supersededRows };
|
|
});
|
|
created = result.row;
|
|
superseded = result.supersededRows;
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
if (
|
|
!normalizedData.idempotencyKey ||
|
|
!isUniqueViolation(error, ISSUE_THREAD_INTERACTION_IDEMPOTENCY_CONSTRAINT)
|
|
) {
|
|
throw error;
|
|
}
|
|
const existing = await getIdempotentInteraction({
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
companyId: issue.companyId,
|
|
idempotencyKey: normalizedData.idempotencyKey,
|
|
});
|
|
if (!existing) throw error;
|
|
if (!isEquivalentCreateRequest(existing, normalizedData, actor, defaultAddresseeUserId)) {
|
|
throw conflict(
|
|
"Interaction idempotency key already exists for a different request",
|
|
{
|
|
idempotencyKey: normalizedData.idempotencyKey,
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(existing);
|
|
await enqueueIssueInteractionChatPublications(db, interaction);
|
|
return interaction;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
if (superseded.length > 0) {
|
|
await emitResolvedInteractionsTelemetry(
|
|
db,
|
|
superseded.map(hydrateInteraction),
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(created);
|
|
emitInteractionCreatedTelemetry({
|
|
interactionKind: interaction.kind,
|
|
usedDeprecatedResolverPolicyAlias,
|
|
});
|
|
return interaction;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
acceptInteraction: async (
|
|
issue: {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
projectId: string | null;
|
|
goalId: string | null;
|
|
status?: string;
|
|
},
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
input: AcceptIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
mutationOptions: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions = {},
|
|
): Promise<ResolvedInteractionResult> => {
|
|
const data = acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse(input);
|
|
const current = await getPendingInteractionForResolution({
|
|
issue,
|
|
interactionId,
|
|
});
|
|
assertInteractionResolutionAllowed(current, actor);
|
|
switch (current.kind) {
|
|
case "suggest_tasks":
|
|
// Accepting suggest_tasks only creates follow-up issues; it does not
|
|
// approve code state or move the source workspace forward, so the
|
|
// workspace_finalize gate (PAPA-440) does not apply here.
|
|
return issueThreadInteractionService(db).acceptSuggestedTasks(
|
|
issue,
|
|
interactionId,
|
|
data,
|
|
actor,
|
|
mutationOptions,
|
|
);
|
|
case "request_confirmation": {
|
|
await assertIssueWorkspaceFinalizedForAccept({
|
|
db,
|
|
issue,
|
|
sourceRunId: current.sourceRunId,
|
|
});
|
|
const accepted = await acceptRequestConfirmation({
|
|
issue,
|
|
current,
|
|
input: data,
|
|
actor,
|
|
mutationOptions,
|
|
});
|
|
return {
|
|
interaction: accepted.interaction,
|
|
continuationIssue: accepted.continuationIssue,
|
|
createdIssues: [],
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
case "request_checkbox_confirmation": {
|
|
await assertIssueWorkspaceFinalizedForAccept({
|
|
db,
|
|
issue,
|
|
sourceRunId: current.sourceRunId,
|
|
});
|
|
const accepted = await acceptRequestConfirmation({
|
|
issue,
|
|
current,
|
|
input: data,
|
|
actor,
|
|
mutationOptions,
|
|
});
|
|
return {
|
|
interaction: accepted.interaction,
|
|
continuationIssue: accepted.continuationIssue,
|
|
createdIssues: [],
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
default:
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Interactions of kind ${current.kind} cannot be accepted`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
acceptSuggestedTasks: async (
|
|
issue: {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
projectId: string | null;
|
|
goalId: string | null;
|
|
status?: string;
|
|
},
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
input: AcceptIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
mutationOptions: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions = {},
|
|
) => {
|
|
assertIssueOpenForInteractionResolution(issue);
|
|
const current = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
|
|
if (!current) throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
if (
|
|
current.companyId !== issue.companyId ||
|
|
current.issueId !== issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
}
|
|
assertInteractionResolutionAllowed(current, actor);
|
|
if (current.kind !== "suggest_tasks") {
|
|
throw unprocessable("Only suggest_tasks interactions can be accepted");
|
|
}
|
|
if (current.status !== "pending") {
|
|
throw interactionTerminalError(current);
|
|
}
|
|
if (actor.agentId && actor.suggestedTaskEffectsAuthorized !== true) {
|
|
throw issueThreadInteractionResolutionError(
|
|
403,
|
|
"interaction_governed_action_denied",
|
|
"Suggested-task creation requires independent task-creation authorization",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
current,
|
|
) as SuggestTasksInteraction;
|
|
const { selectedTasks, skippedClientKeys } =
|
|
resolveSelectedSuggestedTasks({
|
|
interaction,
|
|
selectedClientKeys: input.selectedClientKeys,
|
|
});
|
|
const orderedTasks = buildTaskCreationOrder(selectedTasks);
|
|
const explicitParentIds = [
|
|
...new Set([
|
|
issue.id,
|
|
...(interaction.payload.defaultParentId
|
|
? [interaction.payload.defaultParentId]
|
|
: []),
|
|
...selectedTasks
|
|
.map((task) => task.parentId ?? null)
|
|
.filter((value): value is string => Boolean(value)),
|
|
]),
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
const parentRows =
|
|
explicitParentIds.length === 0
|
|
? []
|
|
: await db
|
|
.select({
|
|
id: issues.id,
|
|
identifier: issues.identifier,
|
|
companyId: issues.companyId,
|
|
})
|
|
.from(issues)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
inArray(issues.id, explicitParentIds),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
if (parentRows.length !== explicitParentIds.length) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"Suggested tasks reference parent issues outside this company or issue tree",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const parentById = new Map(
|
|
parentRows.map((row) => [row.id, row] as const),
|
|
);
|
|
const createdByClientKey = new Map<
|
|
string,
|
|
SuggestTasksResultCreatedTask
|
|
>();
|
|
const createdWakeTargets: IssueWakeTarget[] = [];
|
|
|
|
await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await mutationOptions.beforeResolveInTransaction?.(tx);
|
|
await assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx as unknown as Db, issue, actor);
|
|
const resolvedAt = new Date();
|
|
const [claimed] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "accepted",
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: actor.runId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt,
|
|
updatedAt: resolvedAt,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
|
|
if (!claimed) {
|
|
throw interactionAlreadyResolvedError();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const task of orderedTasks) {
|
|
const parentIssueId = task.parentClientKey
|
|
? (createdByClientKey.get(task.parentClientKey)?.issueId ?? null)
|
|
: (task.parentId ??
|
|
interaction.payload.defaultParentId ??
|
|
issue.id);
|
|
if (!parentIssueId) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Unable to resolve parent for suggested task ${task.clientKey}`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const { issue: createdIssue } = await issueService(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
).createChild(parentIssueId, {
|
|
title: task.title,
|
|
description: task.description ?? null,
|
|
status: "todo",
|
|
workMode: task.workMode ?? "standard",
|
|
priority: task.priority ?? "medium",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: task.assigneeAgentId ?? null,
|
|
assigneeUserId: task.assigneeUserId ?? null,
|
|
projectId: task.projectId ?? issue.projectId,
|
|
goalId: task.goalId ?? issue.goalId,
|
|
billingCode: task.billingCode ?? null,
|
|
createdByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
createdByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
originIdentityContextId: interaction.sourceIdentityContextId ?? null,
|
|
originRunId: interaction.sourceRunId ?? null,
|
|
actorAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
actorUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
} as Parameters<ReturnType<typeof issueService>["createChild"]>[1]);
|
|
|
|
const parentIdentifier =
|
|
createdByClientKey.get(task.parentClientKey ?? "")?.identifier ??
|
|
parentById.get(parentIssueId)?.identifier ??
|
|
null;
|
|
createdByClientKey.set(task.clientKey, {
|
|
clientKey: task.clientKey,
|
|
issueId: createdIssue.id,
|
|
identifier: createdIssue.identifier ?? null,
|
|
title: createdIssue.title,
|
|
parentIssueId,
|
|
parentIdentifier,
|
|
});
|
|
createdWakeTargets.push({
|
|
id: createdIssue.id,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: createdIssue.assigneeAgentId ?? null,
|
|
status: createdIssue.status,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const [updated] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
createdTasks: [...createdByClientKey.values()],
|
|
...(skippedClientKeys.length > 0 ? { skippedClientKeys } : {}),
|
|
},
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
})
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId))
|
|
.returning();
|
|
|
|
await touchIssue(tx, issue.id);
|
|
await mutationOptions.afterResolveInTransaction?.(tx, hydrateInteraction(updated));
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(tx as unknown as Db, hydrateInteraction(updated));
|
|
current.status = updated.status;
|
|
current.result = updated.result;
|
|
current.resolvedByAgentId = updated.resolvedByAgentId;
|
|
current.resolvedByUserId = updated.resolvedByUserId;
|
|
current.resolvedAt = updated.resolvedAt;
|
|
current.updatedAt = updated.updatedAt;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const accepted = hydrateInteraction(current);
|
|
await emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(db, accepted, {
|
|
createdTaskCount: createdWakeTargets.length,
|
|
});
|
|
return {
|
|
interaction: accepted,
|
|
createdIssues: createdWakeTargets,
|
|
};
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
rejectInteraction: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string; status?: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
input: RejectIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
mutationOptions: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions = {},
|
|
) => {
|
|
const data = rejectIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse(input);
|
|
const current = await getPendingInteractionForResolution({
|
|
issue,
|
|
interactionId,
|
|
});
|
|
assertInteractionResolutionAllowed(current, actor);
|
|
switch (current.kind) {
|
|
case "suggest_tasks":
|
|
return issueThreadInteractionService(db).rejectSuggestedTasks(
|
|
issue,
|
|
interactionId,
|
|
data,
|
|
actor,
|
|
current,
|
|
mutationOptions,
|
|
);
|
|
case "request_confirmation":
|
|
case "request_checkbox_confirmation":
|
|
return rejectRequestConfirmation({
|
|
issue,
|
|
current,
|
|
input: data,
|
|
actor,
|
|
mutationOptions,
|
|
});
|
|
default:
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
`Interactions of kind ${current.kind} cannot be rejected`,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
submitItemVerdicts: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string; status?: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
input: SubmitIssueThreadInteractionVerdicts,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
mutationOptions: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions = {},
|
|
): Promise<{
|
|
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction;
|
|
newlyResolvedItemIds: string[];
|
|
}> => {
|
|
assertIssueOpenForInteractionResolution(issue);
|
|
const data = submitIssueThreadInteractionVerdictsSchema.parse(input);
|
|
const submission = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await mutationOptions.beforeResolveInTransaction?.(tx);
|
|
await assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx as unknown as Db, issue, actor);
|
|
const current = await tx
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId))
|
|
.for("update")
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
|
|
if (!current) throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
if (
|
|
current.companyId !== issue.companyId ||
|
|
current.issueId !== issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
}
|
|
if (current.kind !== "request_item_verdicts") {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"Only request_item_verdicts interactions can receive item verdicts",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assertInteractionResolutionAllowed(current, actor);
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
current,
|
|
) as RequestItemVerdictsInteraction;
|
|
if (current.status !== "pending") {
|
|
if (current.status === "answered") {
|
|
const resolvedIds = new Set(
|
|
interaction.result?.items.map((item) => item.id) ?? [],
|
|
);
|
|
const payloadIds = new Set(
|
|
interaction.payload.items.map((item) => item.id),
|
|
);
|
|
for (const submitted of data.verdicts) {
|
|
if (!payloadIds.has(submitted.id)) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(`Unknown item verdict id: ${submitted.id}`);
|
|
}
|
|
if (!resolvedIds.has(submitted.id)) {
|
|
throw interactionTerminalError(current);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return { interaction, newlyResolvedItemIds: [], resolved: false };
|
|
}
|
|
throw interactionTerminalError(current);
|
|
}
|
|
const expired = await expireStaleRequestConfirmationTarget(tx, {
|
|
row: current,
|
|
actor,
|
|
});
|
|
if (expired) {
|
|
return {
|
|
interaction: expired,
|
|
newlyResolvedItemIds: [],
|
|
resolved: false,
|
|
terminalError: interactionTerminalError({
|
|
status: expired.status,
|
|
result: expired.result,
|
|
}),
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const { items, complete, newlyResolvedItemIds } =
|
|
resolveRequestItemVerdictSubmissions({
|
|
interaction,
|
|
input: data,
|
|
actor,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
if (newlyResolvedItemIds.length === 0) {
|
|
return { interaction, newlyResolvedItemIds: [], resolved: false };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const result = {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "resolved",
|
|
complete,
|
|
items,
|
|
} satisfies RequestItemVerdictsResult;
|
|
const [updated] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: complete ? "answered" : "pending",
|
|
result,
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: complete ? (actor.agentId ?? null) : null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: complete ? (actor.runId ?? null) : null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: complete ? (actor.userId ?? null) : null,
|
|
resolvedAt: complete ? now : null,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
|
|
if (!updated) {
|
|
throw interactionAlreadyResolvedError();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
await touchIssue(tx, issue.id);
|
|
await mutationOptions.afterResolveInTransaction?.(tx, hydrateInteraction(updated));
|
|
if (complete) await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(tx as unknown as Db, hydrateInteraction(updated));
|
|
return {
|
|
interaction: hydrateInteraction(updated),
|
|
newlyResolvedItemIds,
|
|
resolved: complete,
|
|
};
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if ("terminalError" in submission) throw submission.terminalError;
|
|
if (submission.resolved) {
|
|
await emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(db, submission.interaction);
|
|
}
|
|
return submission;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
rejectSuggestedTasks: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string; status?: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
input: RejectIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
current: IssueThreadInteractionRow,
|
|
mutationOptions: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions = {},
|
|
) => {
|
|
assertIssueOpenForInteractionResolution(issue);
|
|
if (
|
|
current.companyId !== issue.companyId ||
|
|
current.issueId !== issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
}
|
|
if (current.kind !== "suggest_tasks") {
|
|
throw unprocessable("Only suggest_tasks interactions can be rejected");
|
|
}
|
|
if (current.status !== "pending") {
|
|
throw interactionTerminalError(current);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const [updated] = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await mutationOptions.beforeResolveInTransaction?.(tx);
|
|
await assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx as unknown as Db, issue, actor);
|
|
const rows = await tx.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "rejected",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
rejectionReason: input.reason?.trim() || null,
|
|
},
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: actor.runId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: new Date(),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (rows[0]) await mutationOptions.afterResolveInTransaction?.(tx, hydrateInteraction(rows[0]));
|
|
if (rows[0]) await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(tx as unknown as Db, hydrateInteraction(rows[0]));
|
|
return rows;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (!updated) {
|
|
throw interactionAlreadyResolvedError();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
const rejected = hydrateInteraction(updated);
|
|
await emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(db, rejected);
|
|
return rejected;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByComment: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string; status?: string },
|
|
comment: {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
createdAt: Date | string;
|
|
authorUserId?: string | null;
|
|
createdByRunId?: string | null;
|
|
origin?: string | null;
|
|
},
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
) => {
|
|
if (!comment.authorUserId || comment.origin === "fast_response") return [];
|
|
// Local-CLI adapters post under user auth, so authorUserId can't tell a human from a
|
|
// machine; createdByRunId can. Only genuine human comments (no run context) supersede.
|
|
if (comment.createdByRunId) return [];
|
|
|
|
const [scope] = await db.select({ conversationAgentId: issues.conversationAgentId, conversationUserId: issues.conversationUserId })
|
|
.from(issues).where(and(eq(issues.id, issue.id), eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId)));
|
|
|
|
const rows = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
inArray(issueThreadInteractions.kind, [
|
|
...USER_COMMENT_SUPERSEDABLE_INTERACTION_KINDS,
|
|
]),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const superseded = rows.filter((row) => {
|
|
if (row.kind === "ask_user_questions" && scope?.conversationAgentId && scope.conversationUserId) return false;
|
|
if (!isUserCommentSupersedableKind(row.kind)) return false;
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
row,
|
|
) as UserCommentSupersedableInteraction;
|
|
return (
|
|
shouldSupersedeInteractionOnUserComment(interaction) &&
|
|
isCommentAtOrAfterInteraction({
|
|
commentCreatedAt: comment.createdAt,
|
|
interactionCreatedAt: row.createdAt,
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (superseded.length === 0) return [];
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const expired: IssueThreadInteraction[] = [];
|
|
for (const row of superseded) {
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
if (row.kind === "connection_intent") {
|
|
await tx
|
|
.delete(toolOauthStates)
|
|
.where(eq(toolOauthStates.interactionId, row.id));
|
|
}
|
|
const [resolved] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: buildSupersededByCommentResult(row, comment.id),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, row.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (!resolved) return null;
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(resolved);
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
interaction,
|
|
);
|
|
return interaction;
|
|
});
|
|
if (updated) expired.push(updated);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (expired.length > 0) {
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
await emitResolvedInteractionsTelemetry(db, expired);
|
|
}
|
|
return expired;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
expireRequestConfirmationsSupersededByHistoricalComments: async (issue: {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
companyId: string;
|
|
}) => {
|
|
const [rows, comments] = await Promise.all([
|
|
db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
inArray(issueThreadInteractions.kind, [
|
|
...USER_COMMENT_SUPERSEDABLE_INTERACTION_KINDS,
|
|
]),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
),
|
|
db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueComments)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueComments.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueComments.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
isNotNull(issueComments.authorUserId),
|
|
// Only genuine human comments supersede; machine-originated ones carry createdByRunId.
|
|
isNull(issueComments.createdByRunId),
|
|
eq(issueComments.origin, "comment"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.orderBy(asc(issueComments.createdAt)),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
if (rows.length === 0 || comments.length === 0) return [];
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const expired: IssueThreadInteraction[] = [];
|
|
const supersededByComment = new Map<
|
|
string,
|
|
{
|
|
comment: (typeof comments)[number];
|
|
rowIds: string[];
|
|
}
|
|
>();
|
|
for (const row of rows) {
|
|
if (!isUserCommentSupersedableKind(row.kind)) continue;
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
row,
|
|
) as UserCommentSupersedableInteraction;
|
|
if (!shouldSupersedeInteractionOnUserComment(interaction)) continue;
|
|
|
|
const supersedingComment = comments.find((comment) =>
|
|
isCommentAtOrAfterInteraction({
|
|
commentCreatedAt: comment.createdAt,
|
|
interactionCreatedAt: row.createdAt,
|
|
}),
|
|
);
|
|
if (!supersedingComment) continue;
|
|
|
|
const group = supersededByComment.get(supersedingComment.id);
|
|
if (group) {
|
|
group.rowIds.push(row.id);
|
|
} else {
|
|
supersededByComment.set(supersedingComment.id, {
|
|
comment: supersedingComment,
|
|
rowIds: [row.id],
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const rowById = new Map(rows.map((row) => [row.id, row] as const));
|
|
for (const { comment, rowIds } of supersededByComment.values()) {
|
|
const commentRows = rowIds
|
|
.map((rowId) => rowById.get(rowId))
|
|
.filter((row): row is IssueThreadInteractionRow => Boolean(row));
|
|
const questionRowIds = commentRows
|
|
.filter((row) => row.kind === "ask_user_questions")
|
|
.map((row) => row.id);
|
|
const confirmationRowIds = commentRows
|
|
.filter((row) => isRequestConfirmationLikeKind(row.kind))
|
|
.map((row) => row.id);
|
|
const itemVerdictRows = commentRows.filter(
|
|
(row) => row.kind === "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
);
|
|
const connectionIntentRows = commentRows.filter(
|
|
(row) => row.kind === "connection_intent",
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
if (questionRowIds.length > 0) {
|
|
const sampleQuestionRow = commentRows.find(
|
|
(row) => row.kind === "ask_user_questions",
|
|
);
|
|
if (!sampleQuestionRow) continue;
|
|
const updatedInteractions = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
const updatedRows = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: buildSupersededByCommentResult(
|
|
sampleQuestionRow,
|
|
comment.id,
|
|
),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: comment.authorUserId,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
inArray(issueThreadInteractions.id, questionRowIds),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
const interactions = updatedRows.map(hydrateInteraction);
|
|
for (const interaction of interactions) {
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
interaction,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
return interactions;
|
|
});
|
|
expired.push(...updatedInteractions);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (confirmationRowIds.length > 0) {
|
|
const sampleConfirmationRow = commentRows.find((row) =>
|
|
isRequestConfirmationLikeKind(row.kind),
|
|
);
|
|
if (!sampleConfirmationRow) continue;
|
|
const updatedInteractions = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
const updatedRows = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: buildSupersededByCommentResult(
|
|
sampleConfirmationRow,
|
|
comment.id,
|
|
),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: comment.authorUserId,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
inArray(issueThreadInteractions.id, confirmationRowIds),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
const interactions = updatedRows.map(hydrateInteraction);
|
|
for (const interaction of interactions) {
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
interaction,
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
return interactions;
|
|
});
|
|
expired.push(...updatedInteractions);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const row of itemVerdictRows) {
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async tx => {
|
|
const [retired] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: buildSupersededByCommentResult(row, comment.id),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: comment.authorUserId,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, row.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (retired) await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(tx as unknown as Db, hydrateInteraction(retired));
|
|
return retired;
|
|
});
|
|
if (updated) expired.push(hydrateInteraction(updated));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const row of connectionIntentRows) {
|
|
const [updated] = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await tx
|
|
.delete(toolOauthStates)
|
|
.where(eq(toolOauthStates.interactionId, row.id));
|
|
return tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: buildSupersededByCommentResult(row, comment.id),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: comment.authorUserId,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, row.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
});
|
|
if (updated) expired.push(hydrateInteraction(updated));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (expired.length > 0) {
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
await emitResolvedInteractionsTelemetry(db, expired);
|
|
}
|
|
return expired;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
expireStaleRequestConfirmationsForIssueDocument: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string },
|
|
document: {
|
|
id: string;
|
|
key: string;
|
|
latestRevisionId?: string | null;
|
|
latestRevisionNumber?: number | null;
|
|
} | null,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
) => {
|
|
const rows = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
inArray(issueThreadInteractions.kind, [
|
|
...TARGET_BOUND_INTERACTION_KINDS,
|
|
]),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const staleRows = rows.filter((row) => {
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(row) as TargetBoundInteraction;
|
|
const target = interaction.payload.target;
|
|
if (!target || target.type !== "issue_document") return false;
|
|
const targetIssueId = target.issueId ?? issue.id;
|
|
if (targetIssueId !== issue.id) return false;
|
|
if (document && target.documentId && target.documentId !== document.id)
|
|
return false;
|
|
if (document && target.key !== document.key) return false;
|
|
if (!document) return true;
|
|
return (
|
|
target.revisionId !== document.latestRevisionId ||
|
|
(target.revisionNumber != null &&
|
|
target.revisionNumber !== document.latestRevisionNumber)
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (staleRows.length === 0) return [];
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const expired: IssueThreadInteraction[] = [];
|
|
for (const row of staleRows) {
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(row) as TargetBoundInteraction;
|
|
const target = interaction.payload.target ?? null;
|
|
const currentTarget = buildIssueDocumentTargetFromDocument({
|
|
issueId: issue.id,
|
|
document,
|
|
});
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
const [resolved] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
payload: currentTarget
|
|
? {
|
|
...interaction.payload,
|
|
target: currentTarget,
|
|
}
|
|
: interaction.payload,
|
|
result: buildStaleTargetResult(row, target),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, row.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (!resolved) return null;
|
|
const expiredInteraction = hydrateInteraction(resolved);
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
expiredInteraction,
|
|
);
|
|
return expiredInteraction;
|
|
});
|
|
if (updated) expired.push(updated);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (expired.length > 0) {
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
await emitResolvedInteractionsTelemetry(db, expired);
|
|
}
|
|
return expired;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
expireConnectionIntentsForOwnershipChange: async (issue: { id: string; companyId: string }) => {
|
|
// A pending connection_intent asks for either an AI account or a tool
|
|
// account, and the two leave different things broken. One bulk write gave
|
|
// every row the AI wording, so an expired Notion request told the reader
|
|
// the AI account was missing. Read the pending rows first and name the
|
|
// subject each row actually asked for.
|
|
const pending = await db
|
|
.select({ id: issueThreadInteractions.id, payload: issueThreadInteractions.payload })
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.kind, "connection_intent"),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
));
|
|
const expired: typeof issueThreadInteractions.$inferSelect[] = [];
|
|
for (const row of pending) {
|
|
const payload = row.payload as { purpose?: string; serviceName?: string } | null;
|
|
const subject = payload?.purpose === "ai"
|
|
? "the AI account"
|
|
: `the ${payload?.serviceName?.trim() || "requested"} connection`;
|
|
const [updated] = await db
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "expired",
|
|
reason: `The task was reassigned before the connection request was answered, so ${subject} is still not connected. Reconnect it or choose an available connection.`,
|
|
},
|
|
resolvedAt: now(),
|
|
updatedAt: now(),
|
|
})
|
|
.where(and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, row.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
))
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (updated) {
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(db, hydrateInteraction(updated));
|
|
expired.push(updated);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (expired.length) await db.delete(toolOauthStates).where(inArray(toolOauthStates.interactionId, expired.map((item) => item.id)));
|
|
return expired;
|
|
},
|
|
expirePendingInteractionsForTerminalIssue: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string; status: string },
|
|
actor: InteractionActor = {},
|
|
) => {
|
|
if (!isTerminalIssueStatus(issue.status)) return [];
|
|
const rows = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
// Completed work retains ordinary historical questions for later
|
|
// human answers. Cancellation and governed requests still expire.
|
|
issue.status === "done" ? sql`not ${historicalQuestionCondition()}` : undefined,
|
|
),
|
|
);
|
|
if (rows.length === 0) return [];
|
|
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const expired: IssueThreadInteraction[] = [];
|
|
for (const row of rows) {
|
|
// Same ordering as withdrawal: revoke the linked tool action before
|
|
// resolving the card, inside one transaction. A concurrent gateway
|
|
// claim (approved -> executing) blocks on the revocation's row lock
|
|
// and then aborts; if the card was concurrently resolved instead, the
|
|
// no-row update below rolls the revocation back. A claim that already
|
|
// committed is in flight and cannot be recalled — the card still
|
|
// expires and the execution result lands on it via the gateway's
|
|
// lifecycle reflection.
|
|
const updated = await db
|
|
.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
if (row.kind === "connection_intent") {
|
|
await tx
|
|
.delete(toolOauthStates)
|
|
.where(eq(toolOauthStates.interactionId, row.id));
|
|
}
|
|
await resolveLinkedToolActionRequests(tx, row, {
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
fromStatuses: ["pending", "approved"],
|
|
actor,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
await resolveLinkedSecretProposal(tx as unknown as Db, row, {
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
actor,
|
|
reason: "Issue closed before the secret proposal was resolved",
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
const [resolved] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: buildAdministrativeOutcomeResult(row, "issue_closed"),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, row.id),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (!resolved) throw new InteractionResolvedConcurrentlyError();
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
hydrateInteraction(resolved),
|
|
);
|
|
return resolved;
|
|
})
|
|
.catch((err: unknown) => {
|
|
if (err instanceof InteractionResolvedConcurrentlyError)
|
|
return null;
|
|
throw err;
|
|
});
|
|
if (updated) expired.push(hydrateInteraction(updated));
|
|
}
|
|
if (expired.length > 0) {
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
await emitResolvedInteractionsTelemetry(db, expired);
|
|
}
|
|
return expired;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
withdrawInteraction: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
input: WithdrawIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
mutationOptions: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions = {},
|
|
) => {
|
|
assertIssueOpenForInteractionResolution(issue);
|
|
const data = withdrawIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse(input);
|
|
const current = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (
|
|
!current ||
|
|
current.companyId !== issue.companyId ||
|
|
current.issueId !== issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
}
|
|
if (current.status !== "pending") throw interactionTerminalError(current);
|
|
|
|
const reason = data.reason?.trim() || null;
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
// One transaction, linked tool action first: revoking pending/approved
|
|
// requests before resolving the card means a concurrent gateway claim
|
|
// (approved -> executing) either loses to the revocation's row lock or
|
|
// is detected below and aborts the withdrawal; a concurrent card
|
|
// resolution rolls the revocation back via the status="pending" guard.
|
|
// "approved" is revoked too — the request can be approved from the tool
|
|
// review queue while the card is still pending, and an executable
|
|
// request must not outlive a withdrawn card.
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx as unknown as Db, issue, actor);
|
|
await resolveLinkedToolActionRequests(tx, current, {
|
|
status: "cancelled",
|
|
fromStatuses: ["pending", "approved"],
|
|
actor,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
await resolveLinkedSecretProposal(tx as unknown as Db, current, {
|
|
status: "withdrawn",
|
|
actor,
|
|
reason,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
if (current.kind === "request_confirmation") {
|
|
const active = await tx
|
|
.select({ id: toolActionRequests.id })
|
|
.from(toolActionRequests)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(toolActionRequests.companyId, current.companyId),
|
|
eq(toolActionRequests.interactionId, current.id),
|
|
inArray(toolActionRequests.status, ["executing", "executed"]),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (active)
|
|
throw conflict(
|
|
"The linked tool action is already executing and can no longer be withdrawn",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
const [row] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "cancelled",
|
|
result: buildAdministrativeOutcomeResult(
|
|
current,
|
|
"withdrawn",
|
|
reason,
|
|
),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: actor.runId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (!row) throw interactionAlreadyResolvedError();
|
|
const withdrawn = hydrateInteraction(row);
|
|
await mutationOptions.afterResolveInTransaction?.(tx, withdrawn);
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
withdrawn,
|
|
);
|
|
return row;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
const withdrawn = hydrateInteraction(updated);
|
|
await emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(db, withdrawn);
|
|
return withdrawn;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
answerQuestions: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string; status?: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
input: RespondIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
mutationOptions: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions = {},
|
|
) => {
|
|
const current = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
|
|
if (!current) throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
if (
|
|
current.companyId !== issue.companyId ||
|
|
current.issueId !== issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
}
|
|
assertInteractionResolutionAllowed(current, actor);
|
|
if (current.kind !== "ask_user_questions") {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"Only ask_user_questions interactions can be answered",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (current.status !== "pending") {
|
|
throw interactionTerminalError(current);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const interaction = hydrateInteraction(
|
|
current,
|
|
) as AskUserQuestionsInteraction;
|
|
const normalizedAnswers = normalizeQuestionAnswers({
|
|
questions: interaction.payload.questions,
|
|
textQuestionIds: new Set((interaction.payload.questionSet?.questions ?? [])
|
|
.filter((question) => question.answerMode === "text")
|
|
.map((question) => question.id)),
|
|
answers: input.answers,
|
|
});
|
|
if (interaction.payload.questionSet) {
|
|
try {
|
|
await parseQuestionInteractionAnswers(interaction.payload.questionSet, normalizedAnswers, interaction.payload.questions);
|
|
} catch (error) {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
error instanceof Error ? error.message : "Invalid question response",
|
|
{ code: "invalid_question_response" },
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
// Serialize against task completion/cancellation and use the persisted
|
|
// status, including when the caller read the task before it closed.
|
|
const [issueRow] = await tx.select({ status: issues.status }).from(issues)
|
|
.where(and(eq(issues.id, issue.id), eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId))).for("update");
|
|
if (!issueRow) throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
let historicalAnswer = false;
|
|
if (isTerminalIssueStatus(issueRow.status)) {
|
|
if (issueRow.status === "done" && actor.userId && !actor.agentId && !actor.runId && !actor.systemId) {
|
|
historicalAnswer = (await tx.select({ id: issueThreadInteractions.id }).from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(and(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId), eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
historicalQuestionCondition())).limit(1)).length > 0;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!historicalAnswer) throw interactionIssueClosedError();
|
|
}
|
|
await assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx as unknown as Db, issue, actor);
|
|
await mutationOptions.beforeResolveInTransaction?.(tx);
|
|
const resolvedAt = new Date();
|
|
const [row] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "answered",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: normalizedAnswers,
|
|
summaryMarkdown: input.summaryMarkdown ?? null,
|
|
},
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: actor.runId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt,
|
|
updatedAt: resolvedAt,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
|
|
if (!row) throw interactionAlreadyResolvedError();
|
|
const answered = hydrateInteraction(row) as AskUserQuestionsInteraction;
|
|
// This answer updates conversation history only. It must not resume
|
|
// the completed source run or enqueue new work for the closed task.
|
|
if (!historicalAnswer) {
|
|
await notifyDeliveryWork(tx, DELIVERY_QUEUES.question);
|
|
await tx
|
|
.insert(issueQuestionResponseDeliveries)
|
|
.values(questionResponseDeliveryValues(answered));
|
|
}
|
|
// Provider callbacks use this hook to atomically claim and complete
|
|
// the action that resolved the interaction. Settle all remaining
|
|
// provider controls only after that winner is durable; otherwise the
|
|
// generic sibling-expiry pass would invalidate a Slack/Teams modal
|
|
// submit token before it can be claimed in this same transaction.
|
|
await mutationOptions.afterResolveInTransaction?.(tx, answered);
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
answered,
|
|
);
|
|
return row;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
const answered = hydrateInteraction(updated);
|
|
await emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(db, answered);
|
|
return answered;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
dismissInteraction: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
) => {
|
|
if (!actor.userId || actor.agentId || actor.runId || actor.systemId) {
|
|
throw forbidden("Only a human can dismiss a request");
|
|
}
|
|
return db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
// Use the same lock order as resolution and completion. Dismissal only
|
|
// changes attention state; it never resolves or executes the request.
|
|
const [task] = await tx.select({
|
|
id: issues.id,
|
|
companyId: issues.companyId,
|
|
status: issues.status,
|
|
executionRunId: issues.executionRunId,
|
|
workMode: issues.workMode,
|
|
assigneeAgentId: issues.assigneeAgentId,
|
|
assigneeUserId: issues.assigneeUserId,
|
|
reviewPolicy: issues.reviewPolicy,
|
|
createdByAgentId: issues.createdByAgentId,
|
|
createdByUserId: issues.createdByUserId,
|
|
}).from(issues)
|
|
.where(and(eq(issues.id, issue.id), eq(issues.companyId, issue.companyId))).for("update");
|
|
if (!task) throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
const [current] = await tx.select().from(issueThreadInteractions).where(and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId), eq(issueThreadInteractions.companyId, issue.companyId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.issueId, issue.id),
|
|
)).for("update");
|
|
if (!current) throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
assertInteractionResolutionAllowed(current, actor);
|
|
if (current.status !== "pending" || current.dismissedAt) return hydrateInteraction(current);
|
|
if (task.status === "in_review" && isRequestConfirmationLikeKind(current.kind)) {
|
|
await assertRequestConfirmationResolutionAllowedUnderLock(tx as unknown as Db, task, current, actor);
|
|
}
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const [updated] = await tx.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({ dismissedAt: now, dismissedByUserId: actor.userId, updatedAt: now })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId)).returning();
|
|
return hydrateInteraction(updated!);
|
|
});
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
skipInteraction: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string; status?: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
input: SkipIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
) => {
|
|
assertIssueOpenForInteractionResolution(issue);
|
|
const data = skipIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse(input);
|
|
const current = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
|
|
if (
|
|
!current ||
|
|
current.companyId !== issue.companyId ||
|
|
current.issueId !== issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
}
|
|
if (current.status !== "pending") throw interactionTerminalError(current);
|
|
|
|
const reason = data.reason?.trim() || null;
|
|
const now = new Date();
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx as unknown as Db, issue, actor);
|
|
await resolveLinkedToolActionRequests(tx, current, {
|
|
status: "cancelled",
|
|
fromStatuses: ["pending", "approved"],
|
|
actor,
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
await resolveLinkedSecretProposal(tx as unknown as Db, current, {
|
|
status: "withdrawn",
|
|
actor,
|
|
reason: reason ?? "Skipped from the task composer",
|
|
now,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (current.kind === "request_confirmation") {
|
|
const active = await tx
|
|
.select({ id: toolActionRequests.id })
|
|
.from(toolActionRequests)
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(toolActionRequests.companyId, current.companyId),
|
|
eq(toolActionRequests.interactionId, current.id),
|
|
inArray(toolActionRequests.status, ["executing", "executed"]),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
if (active)
|
|
throw conflict(
|
|
"The linked tool action has begun executing and can no longer be skipped",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const [row] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "cancelled",
|
|
result: buildSkippedOutcomeResult(current, reason),
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: actor.runId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt: now,
|
|
updatedAt: now,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
if (!row) throw interactionAlreadyResolvedError();
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
hydrateInteraction(row),
|
|
);
|
|
return row;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
const skipped = hydrateInteraction(updated);
|
|
await emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(db, skipped);
|
|
return skipped;
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
cancelQuestions: async (
|
|
issue: { id: string; companyId: string; status?: string },
|
|
interactionId: string,
|
|
input: CancelIssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
actor: InteractionActor,
|
|
mutationOptions: InteractionResolutionMutationOptions = {},
|
|
) => {
|
|
assertIssueOpenForInteractionResolution(issue);
|
|
const data = cancelIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse(input);
|
|
const current = await db
|
|
.select()
|
|
.from(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId))
|
|
.then((rows) => rows[0] ?? null);
|
|
|
|
if (!current) throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
if (
|
|
current.companyId !== issue.companyId ||
|
|
current.issueId !== issue.id
|
|
) {
|
|
throw interactionNotFoundError();
|
|
}
|
|
if (current.kind !== "ask_user_questions") {
|
|
throw unprocessable(
|
|
"Only ask_user_questions interactions can be cancelled",
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
if (current.status !== "pending") {
|
|
throw interactionTerminalError(current);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const reason = data.reason?.trim() || null;
|
|
const updated = await db.transaction(async (tx) => {
|
|
await assertInteractionRunWriteAllowed(tx as unknown as Db, issue, actor);
|
|
const resolvedAt = new Date();
|
|
const [row] = await tx
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({
|
|
status: "cancelled",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
cancelled: true,
|
|
cancellationReason: reason,
|
|
summaryMarkdown: null,
|
|
},
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: actor.agentId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByRunId: actor.runId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedByUserId: actor.userId ?? null,
|
|
resolvedAt,
|
|
updatedAt: resolvedAt,
|
|
})
|
|
.where(
|
|
and(
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, interactionId),
|
|
eq(issueThreadInteractions.status, "pending"),
|
|
),
|
|
)
|
|
.returning();
|
|
|
|
if (!row) throw interactionAlreadyResolvedError();
|
|
const cancelled = hydrateInteraction(row);
|
|
await mutationOptions.afterResolveInTransaction?.(tx, cancelled);
|
|
await enqueueTerminalIssueInteractionChatPublications(
|
|
tx as unknown as Db,
|
|
cancelled,
|
|
);
|
|
return row;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
await touchIssue(db, issue.id);
|
|
const cancelled = hydrateInteraction(updated);
|
|
await emitInteractionResolvedTelemetry(db, cancelled);
|
|
return cancelled;
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
}
|