mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-17 20:09:05 +02:00
Dotta
5458940a6e
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner needs repeatable evaluation contracts. > - Evaluation code must stay separate from provider launch and production orchestration. > - Offline fixtures need stable compatibility, scoring, traceability, and report rules. > - Published Runner consumers need only the supported evaluation contract surface. > - This pull request adds offline evaluation tooling and a workspace-private matrix kernel. > - The benefit is deterministic evaluation without credentials or paid provider calls. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11297 This pull request extracts the offline evaluation unit from the earlier aggregate Runner work. ## What Changed - Add a workspace-private, provider-neutral evaluation matrix kernel. - Add the public `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner/evals` compatibility and native execution contracts. - Add fail-closed runnerd artifact and protocol compatibility checks. - Add deterministic workflow catalogs, scoring, traceability, and report generation. - Add sanitized Codex, OpenCode, and ACPX fixtures. - Add package-boundary and clean-consumer checks. - Add the eval package manifest to the Docker dependency stage. - Add the generated protocol fixture digest without changing the lockfile. ## Verification GitHub Actions must run: - Runner TypeScript and Rust type checks. - Runner unit and protocol tests. - Evaluation kernel tests. - Workflow traceability checks. - Clean-consumer and package-boundary checks. - Repository test, type-check, build, policy, and security gates. No local test command was run. The repository owner requested GitHub-only verification. ## Risks This is a large greenfield review surface with 51 files. The code does not launch a live provider or load credentials. Package and protocol drift fail closed. The workspace lockfile remains under the existing CI-owned process. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with the GPT-5 agent model. The work used high reasoning, repository inspection, tool use, and parallel code review. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge
33 lines
2.0 KiB
JavaScript
33 lines
2.0 KiB
JavaScript
import { mkdir, readFile, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises";
|
|
import { resolve } from "node:path";
|
|
|
|
const packageRoot = resolve(import.meta.dirname, "..");
|
|
const evals = await import(resolve(packageRoot, "dist/eval/index.js"));
|
|
const packageManifest = JSON.parse(await readFile(resolve(packageRoot, "package.json"), "utf8"));
|
|
const traceability = JSON.parse(await readFile(resolve(packageRoot, "spec/evals/stress-workflow-traceability.json"), "utf8"));
|
|
const traceabilitySummary = evals.validateStressTraceabilityManifest(traceability);
|
|
const results = await evals.runDeterministicRunnerWorkflowMatrix({ bundleId: "runner-workflows-deterministic-v1" });
|
|
const report = evals.buildRunnerWorkflowEvalReport({
|
|
source: "deterministic",
|
|
bundle: {
|
|
id: "runner-workflows-deterministic-v1",
|
|
runnerVersion: packageManifest.version,
|
|
promptPolicyId: "stress-sanitized-v1",
|
|
providerVersions: { codex: "fixture-v1", opencode: "fixture-v1", acpx: "fixture-v1" },
|
|
},
|
|
results,
|
|
traceability: traceabilitySummary,
|
|
});
|
|
if (report.aggregate.passed !== report.aggregate.scoreable) {
|
|
throw new Error(`Runner workflow evals passed ${report.aggregate.passed}/${report.aggregate.scoreable}`);
|
|
}
|
|
const outputDirectory = resolve(packageRoot, ".paperclip-local/evals/workflows");
|
|
await mkdir(outputDirectory, { recursive: true });
|
|
await Promise.all([
|
|
writeFile(resolve(outputDirectory, "deterministic-report.json"), `${JSON.stringify(report, null, 2)}\n`),
|
|
writeFile(resolve(outputDirectory, "deterministic-report.md"), evals.renderRunnerWorkflowMarkdown(report)),
|
|
writeFile(resolve(outputDirectory, "deterministic-report.junit.xml"), evals.renderRunnerWorkflowJUnit(report)),
|
|
writeFile(resolve(outputDirectory, "github-summary.md"), evals.renderRunnerWorkflowGitHubSummary(report)),
|
|
]);
|
|
process.stdout.write(`Runner workflow evals passed: ${report.aggregate.passed}/${report.aggregate.scoreable}; coverage ${report.coverage.canonicalOperations} operations, ${report.coverage.capabilityCases} capability cases, ${report.coverage.workflows} workflows.\n`);
|