Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/__tests__/fixtures/plugin-worker-invocation-scope.cjs
T
DottaandPaperclip 931eec3fbf feat(mcp) [split 4/8]: wire gateway runtime and Smoke Lab (#9559)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters,
UI surfaces, and operator verification
> - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated
or human review
> - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs
stay below the 100-file review limit
> - This pull request is split 4/8 and focuses on gateway runtime, Smoke
Lab, plugins, and server wiring
> - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while
preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

- Related parity reference: #9534
- Problem: The policy core needs runtime execution, endpoint guards,
route registration, heartbeat integration, and adapter MCP injection to
become operational.
- Proposed solution: Adds the remaining server routes/wiring/consumers,
runtime tests, adapter-utils MCP contracts, and Claude/Codex injection
implementations required by the server layer.
- Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or
rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor
of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves.
- Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access
work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate
roadmap initiative.
- Stack position: base branch is `pap10341-split/03-server-tool-access`.
- Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete
eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate
remains empty.
- Requested review: SecurityEngineer for gateway, endpoint guard, token
issuance, and runtime wiring; Greptile on every PR.

## What Changed

- Adds the remaining server routes/wiring/consumers, runtime tests,
adapter-utils MCP contracts, and Claude/Codex injection implementations
required by the server layer.
- Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable.
- Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven
stack levels.

## Verification

- `pnpm typecheck`
- Changed server test set — 26 files, 382 tests passed
- Affected server adapter tests — 38 tests passed after concrete adapter
boundary move
- Adapter-utils and Codex focused tests — 76 tests passed

## Risks

- Remote endpoint validation, token handling, and runtime supervision
are security-sensitive and can fail closed or deny legitimate access if
misconfigured.
- Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers;
mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy.
- Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from
#9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context
window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and
code-execution tools enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link
explicitly required for this coordinated split stack
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge


## Stack Coordination

- Internal execution plan:
[PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan)
- Parity reference: #9534
- Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563
- Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff
at #9563.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-07-14 15:07:30 -05:00

112 lines
2.5 KiB
JavaScript

const readline = require("node:readline");
let nextRequestId = 1;
const pendingNested = new Map();
function send(message) {
process.stdout.write(`${JSON.stringify(message)}\n`);
}
function sendNestedHostRequest(originalRequest, invocationId) {
const nestedId = `nested-${nextRequestId++}`;
const params = originalRequest.params?.params ?? {};
const mode = params.mode;
const requestedCompanyId = params.requestedCompanyId;
const hostMethod = params.hostMethod || "companies.get";
const nestedParams = hostMethod === "secrets.resolve"
? {
companyId: requestedCompanyId,
secretRef: {
type: "secret_ref",
secretId: params.secretId || "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
},
configPath: params.configPath || "apiKeyRef",
}
: {
companyId: requestedCompanyId,
};
const nestedRequest = {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: nestedId,
method: hostMethod,
params: nestedParams,
};
if (mode === "echo") {
nestedRequest.paperclipInvocationId = invocationId;
} else if (mode === "unknown") {
nestedRequest.paperclipInvocationId = "unknown-invocation";
}
pendingNested.set(nestedId, originalRequest.id);
send(nestedRequest);
}
const rl = readline.createInterface({
input: process.stdin,
crlfDelay: Infinity,
});
rl.on("line", (line) => {
if (!line.trim()) return;
const message = JSON.parse(line);
if (message.id && pendingNested.has(message.id)) {
const originalId = pendingNested.get(message.id);
pendingNested.delete(message.id);
if (message.error) {
send({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: originalId,
error: message.error,
});
return;
}
send({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: originalId,
result: message.result,
});
return;
}
const method = message && typeof message.method === "string" ? message.method : null;
if (method === "initialize") {
send({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: message.id,
result: {
ok: true,
supportedMethods: ["getData", "performAction"],
},
});
return;
}
if (method === "getData" || method === "performAction") {
sendNestedHostRequest(message, message.paperclipInvocation?.id);
return;
}
if (method === "shutdown") {
send({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: message.id,
result: {},
});
setImmediate(() => process.exit(0));
return;
}
send({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: message.id,
error: {
code: -32601,
message: `Unhandled method: ${method}`,
},
});
});