mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-07 16:11:46 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The experimental Paperclip Runner can execute a guarded Codex run and persist provider-neutral events. > - The task page still reads direct-adapter transcripts and cannot present those native events. > - Structured runner questions must also use the existing task interaction experience. > - Runtime selection must use the persisted run mode, not an adapter name or a current feature flag. > - This pull request projects native events and questions into the existing task thread. > - Direct adapters keep their existing transcript, composer, interaction, and finalization paths. > - The benefit is a complete native Codex task thread without a behavior change for existing adapters. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12202. This pull request replaces that stale implementation on current `master`. **What happened?** The server persists native runner events and structured input requests. The task page only consumes direct-adapter transcripts. A native run therefore cannot present a complete transcript, usage, or question flow through the normal task experience. **Expected behavior** Native runs project persisted provider-neutral events into the existing task thread. Native structured questions use the existing interaction card. Direct adapters retain their current behavior. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Enable the experimental runner. 2. Start a native Codex run that emits progress, usage, a structured question, and a final reply. 3. Open the task page. 4. Observe that the direct-adapter transcript path cannot project the native event records. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `67f9867bc`. ## What Changed - Add the canonical structured-question validator and shared contract exports. - Materialize native input requests as existing task interactions. - Validate native answers and deliver them through the durable question-response receipt. - Resume the original PRP request with an idempotent `request.resolve` command. - Project native messages, tool activity, cumulative usage, and final replies into the existing transcript model. - Propagate persisted `runtimeMode` to the task page and select native handling only for `runtimeMode: "native"`. - Expire pending interactions through the shared issue service on every terminal transition, including decisions, stalled reviews, tree control, and pipeline retry cleanup. - Queue native run cancellation while a transaction is open and execute it only after the owning transaction commits. - Keep nonterminal and non-runner issue paths on their existing service call shapes and behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed, including the Rust runner release build and protocol/catalog drift gates. - Focused native-thread and lifecycle suites — 18 files and 481 tests passed during review. - `issue-execution-policy-routes.test.ts` — 19/19 passed after the final transactional-queue expectation update. - `issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts` — 87/87 passed in the final isolated compatibility rerun. - GitHub Actions — policy, build, canary, typecheck/release registry, 5 serialized server shards, 8 general-test shards, 3 browser shards, and both aggregate gates passed on `7793f3193`. - Security — Snyk, Socket Project Report, Socket PR Alerts, and Superagent passed. - Greptile — 5/5 on `7793f3193`; all actionable review threads resolved. - `git diff --check` — passed. - Diff against `master`: 44 files. ## Compatibility Boundary - Native transcript polling only runs when the persisted run reports `runtimeMode: "native"`. - Missing or legacy runtime modes continue through `useLiveRunTranscripts`. - Legacy questions keep the existing optional free-text choice. - Native closed select sets can suppress that legacy fallback. - Terminal cleanup uses the same issue service for native and legacy interactions; only a bound native question schedules a native run cancellation. - Native cancellation happens after transaction commit, so failed or rolled-back writes do not cancel a still-valid run. - The durable delivery service checks the original native request before it considers a continuation run. - This pull request adds no migration, dependency, workflow, manifest, or lockfile change. ## Risks The main risk is routing a direct-adapter task through native handling or changing terminal issue behavior. The implementation selects the native path only from persisted runtime facts, retains the existing nonterminal call shape, and schedules native cancellation only for a validated bound native question after commit. Focused and repository-wide tests cover both paths. Native requests remain bound to the company, issue, run, and agent; answers are validated, durable, and idempotent across reconnects. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 family. The client does not expose the exact deployment ID or context window. Agentic reasoning, tool use, and code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run the affected local tests and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated the compatibility notes for this change - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I addressed all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge
572 lines
18 KiB
TypeScript
572 lines
18 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
ISSUE_THREAD_INTERACTION_CANONICAL_RESOLVER_POLICIES,
|
|
ISSUE_THREAD_INTERACTION_LEGACY_RESOLVER_POLICY_ALIASES,
|
|
legacyIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicyAlias,
|
|
normalizeIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy,
|
|
} from "./constants.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
askUserQuestionsResultSchema,
|
|
createIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
paperclipQuestionSetPayloadSchema,
|
|
requestConfirmationPayloadSchema,
|
|
requestConfirmationResultSchema,
|
|
requestItemVerdictsResultSchema,
|
|
submitIssueThreadInteractionVerdictsSchema,
|
|
} from "./validators/issue.js";
|
|
|
|
describe("issue thread interaction schemas", () => {
|
|
it("defines canonical resolver policies and normalizes compatibility aliases", () => {
|
|
expect(ISSUE_THREAD_INTERACTION_CANONICAL_RESOLVER_POLICIES).toEqual([
|
|
"anyone",
|
|
"not_creator",
|
|
"human_only",
|
|
]);
|
|
expect(ISSUE_THREAD_INTERACTION_LEGACY_RESOLVER_POLICY_ALIASES).toEqual([
|
|
"board_or_agents",
|
|
"board_only",
|
|
]);
|
|
expect(normalizeIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy("board_or_agents")).toBe("anyone");
|
|
expect(normalizeIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy("board_only")).toBe("human_only");
|
|
expect(normalizeIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicy("not_creator")).toBe("not_creator");
|
|
expect(legacyIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicyAlias("anyone")).toBe("board_or_agents");
|
|
expect(legacyIssueThreadInteractionResolverPolicyAlias("not_creator")).toBeNull();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it.each(["anyone", "not_creator", "human_only", "board_or_agents", "board_only"] as const)(
|
|
"accepts resolver policy input %s",
|
|
(resolverPolicy) => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
resolverPolicy,
|
|
payload: { version: 1, prompt: "Proceed?" },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(parsed.resolverPolicy).toBe(resolverPolicy);
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
it("parses request_confirmation payloads with default no-wake continuation", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Apply this plan?",
|
|
acceptLabel: "Apply",
|
|
rejectLabel: "Revise",
|
|
rejectRequiresReason: true,
|
|
rejectReasonLabel: "What needs to change?",
|
|
declineReasonPlaceholder: "Optional: tell the agent what you'd change.",
|
|
detailsMarkdown: "The current plan document will be accepted as-is.",
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: true,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "none",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
prompt: "Apply this plan?",
|
|
acceptLabel: "Apply",
|
|
rejectLabel: "Revise",
|
|
rejectRequiresReason: true,
|
|
rejectReasonLabel: "What needs to change?",
|
|
allowDeclineReason: true,
|
|
declineReasonPlaceholder: "Optional: tell the agent what you'd change.",
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: true,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("round-trips versioned tool action payload and lifecycle metadata", () => {
|
|
const payload = requestConfirmationPayloadSchema.parse({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Approve send_email?",
|
|
toolAction: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
actionRequestId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
invocationId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
toolDisplayName: "Send email",
|
|
connectionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
|
|
applicationId: "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444",
|
|
appDisplayName: "Gmail",
|
|
risk: "write",
|
|
previewMarkdown: "Send an email to the reviewed recipient.",
|
|
argumentsSummaryJson: '{"to":"recipient@example.com"}',
|
|
argumentsHash: "reviewed-arguments-hash",
|
|
expiresAt: "2026-07-12T16:00:00.000Z",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
const result = requestConfirmationResultSchema.parse({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "accepted",
|
|
toolAction: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
status: "executed",
|
|
errorCode: null,
|
|
errorMessage: null,
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-07-12T15:05:00.000Z",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(payload.toolAction).toMatchObject({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
toolDisplayName: "Send email",
|
|
risk: "write",
|
|
argumentsHash: "reviewed-arguments-hash",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(result.toolAction).toMatchObject({ version: 1, status: "executed" });
|
|
expect(requestConfirmationPayloadSchema.parse({ version: 1, prompt: "Legacy confirmation?" }).toolAction)
|
|
.toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("parses superseded confirmation results with a replacement pointer", () => {
|
|
const result = requestConfirmationResultSchema.parse({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "superseded_by_newer_request",
|
|
supersededByInteractionId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result).toEqual({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "superseded_by_newer_request",
|
|
supersededByInteractionId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts run-attributed agent item verdict results and rejects missing runs", () => {
|
|
const result = {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "resolved",
|
|
complete: true,
|
|
items: [{
|
|
id: "api",
|
|
verdict: "approve",
|
|
resolvedByAgentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
resolvedByRunId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
resolvedAt: "2026-08-14T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
}],
|
|
};
|
|
expect(requestItemVerdictsResultSchema.parse(result)).toMatchObject(result);
|
|
expect(() => requestItemVerdictsResultSchema.parse({
|
|
...result,
|
|
items: [{ ...result.items[0], resolvedByRunId: undefined }],
|
|
})).toThrow("resolvedByRunId is required for an agent resolver");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts issue document targets for request_confirmation interactions", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Accept the latest plan revision?",
|
|
allowDeclineReason: false,
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "issue_document",
|
|
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
documentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
|
|
revisionNumber: 2,
|
|
label: "Plan v2",
|
|
href: "/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.kind).toBe("request_confirmation");
|
|
if (parsed.kind !== "request_confirmation") return;
|
|
expect(parsed.payload.target).toMatchObject({
|
|
type: "issue_document",
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionNumber: 2,
|
|
label: "Plan v2",
|
|
href: "/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts custom targets for request_confirmation interactions", () => {
|
|
for (const href of [
|
|
"https://example.com/checklist",
|
|
"http://example.com/checklist",
|
|
"/PAP/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
|
|
"#document-plan",
|
|
]) {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Proceed with the external checklist?",
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "custom",
|
|
key: "external-checklist",
|
|
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
|
|
revisionNumber: 1,
|
|
label: "Checklist v1",
|
|
href,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.kind).toBe("request_confirmation");
|
|
if (parsed.kind !== "request_confirmation") return;
|
|
expect(parsed.payload.target).toMatchObject({
|
|
type: "custom",
|
|
key: "external-checklist",
|
|
label: "Checklist v1",
|
|
href,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("parses ask_user_questions supersede flags and expired results", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
title: "Choose scope",
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: false,
|
|
questions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "scope",
|
|
prompt: "Which scope should I use?",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
options: [{ id: "small", label: "Small" }],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: false,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(askUserQuestionsResultSchema.parse({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
|
|
commentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
summaryMarkdown: null,
|
|
})).toMatchObject({
|
|
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
|
|
commentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("retains canonical runner question sets without narrowing their public bounds", () => {
|
|
const questionSet = {
|
|
schema: "paperclip.question_set.v1" as const,
|
|
title: "Runner input",
|
|
questions: [{
|
|
id: "deployment-color",
|
|
prompt: "Which deployment color should the runner use?",
|
|
required: true,
|
|
answerMode: "single_select" as const,
|
|
options: [{ id: "blue", label: "Blue" }],
|
|
}],
|
|
};
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "none",
|
|
resolverPolicy: "human_only",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
questions: [{
|
|
id: "deployment-color",
|
|
prompt: "Which deployment color should the runner use?",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
allowOther: false,
|
|
options: [{ id: "blue", label: "Blue" }],
|
|
}],
|
|
questionSet,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(parsed.kind).toBe("ask_user_questions");
|
|
if (parsed.kind !== "ask_user_questions") return;
|
|
expect(parsed.payload.questionSet).toEqual(questionSet);
|
|
|
|
expect(() => paperclipQuestionSetPayloadSchema.parse({
|
|
...questionSet,
|
|
questions: [{ ...questionSet.questions[0], answerMode: "text", options: questionSet.questions[0].options }],
|
|
})).toThrow("text questions cannot define options");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unsafe request_confirmation target hrefs", () => {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Proceed?",
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "custom",
|
|
key: "external-checklist",
|
|
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
|
|
label: "Checklist v1",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
} as const;
|
|
|
|
for (const href of [
|
|
"javascript:alert(1)",
|
|
"data:text/html,hi",
|
|
"//evil.example/path",
|
|
"file:///tmp/x",
|
|
"mailto:user@example.com",
|
|
"slack://channel?id=1",
|
|
"vscode://file/tmp/x",
|
|
"ftp://example.com/file",
|
|
]) {
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
target: {
|
|
...base.payload.target,
|
|
href,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("href must be a root-relative path, same-page fragment, or http(s) URL");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("parses request_checkbox_confirmation payloads with checkbox defaults", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
|
|
{ id: "item-2", label: "Old screenshot", description: "Captured during QA." },
|
|
],
|
|
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-2"],
|
|
minSelected: 0,
|
|
maxSelected: 2,
|
|
acceptLabel: "Archive selected",
|
|
rejectRequiresReason: true,
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "issue_document",
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
|
|
revisionNumber: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
|
|
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
allowDeclineReason: true,
|
|
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-2"],
|
|
minSelected: 0,
|
|
maxSelected: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects invalid request_checkbox_confirmation option references and bounds", () => {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
|
|
{ id: "item-2", label: "Old screenshot" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
} as const;
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
|
|
{ id: "item-1", label: "Duplicate" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("Option ids must be unique within one checkbox confirmation");
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["missing"],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("defaultSelectedOptionIds must reference existing option ids");
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-1"],
|
|
minSelected: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("defaultSelectedOptionIds must satisfy minSelected");
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
minSelected: 2,
|
|
maxSelected: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("maxSelected must be greater than or equal to minSelected");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unsafe request_checkbox_confirmation target hrefs", () => {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
|
|
options: [{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" }],
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "custom",
|
|
key: "external-checklist",
|
|
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
|
|
label: "Checklist v1",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
} as const;
|
|
|
|
for (const href of ["file:///tmp/x", "slack://channel?id=1", "vscode://file/tmp/x"]) {
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
target: {
|
|
...base.payload.target,
|
|
href,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("href must be a root-relative path, same-page fragment, or http(s) URL");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts empty checkbox selections and rejects duplicate selected option ids", () => {
|
|
expect(acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({ selectedOptionIds: [] })).toEqual({
|
|
selectedOptionIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(() => acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
selectedOptionIds: ["item-1", "item-1"],
|
|
})).toThrow("selectedOptionIds must be unique");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("parses request_item_verdicts payloads with defaults", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
|
|
items: [
|
|
{ id: "api", label: "API route", description: "Server submit endpoint" },
|
|
{ id: "docs", label: "Docs", previewMarkdown: "Document the route." },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
verdicts: ["approve", "reject"],
|
|
requireReasonOn: ["reject"],
|
|
allowBulkApprove: true,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts request_item_verdicts defer when enabled explicitly", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
|
|
items: [{ id: "api", label: "API route" }],
|
|
verdicts: ["approve", "reject", "defer"],
|
|
requireReasonOn: ["reject", "defer"],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
verdicts: ["approve", "reject", "defer"],
|
|
requireReasonOn: ["reject", "defer"],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects invalid request_item_verdicts item and reason references", () => {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
|
|
items: [
|
|
{ id: "api", label: "API route" },
|
|
{ id: "docs", label: "Docs" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
} as const;
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
items: [],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
items: [
|
|
{ id: "api", label: "API route" },
|
|
{ id: "api", label: "Duplicate" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("Item ids must be unique within one item verdict request");
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
items: Array.from({ length: 201 }, (_value, index) => ({
|
|
id: `item-${index}`,
|
|
label: `Item ${index}`,
|
|
})),
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
verdicts: ["approve", "reject"],
|
|
requireReasonOn: ["defer"],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("requireReasonOn must reference enabled verdicts");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects duplicate request_item_verdicts submit ids", () => {
|
|
expect(() => submitIssueThreadInteractionVerdictsSchema.parse({
|
|
verdicts: [
|
|
{ id: "api", verdict: "approve" },
|
|
{ id: "api", verdict: "reject", reason: "Needs revision" },
|
|
],
|
|
})).toThrow("verdict item ids must be unique");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|