Files
PaperClipAI/tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-run-policy.test.ts
T
f4337bb5fb test(evals): land the chat catalog eval harness on master (#19614)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The chat-feature evals measure whether agents complete real chat
requests through the product
> - The chat catalog eval harness and its repairs live on the
`chat-eval/master-candidate` branch, not on master
> - Today's work made 139 of 242 chat evals pass in verified single-case
live runs. Each product fix landed on master as its own pull request
> - The eval-side changes (setups, graders, fault seams, evidence
capture) still exist only on the candidate
> - This pull request lands the harness on master. Master stays the
source of truth for product behavior
> - The benefit is one tree: evals run against master commits, and
product fixes reach the evals as soon as they merge

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19441, Refs #19599, Refs #20270, Refs #20334, Refs #20342, Refs
#20344, Refs #20354, Refs #20360, Refs #20373, Refs #20382, Refs #20409

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The chat catalog eval harness and the product it evaluates live on a
long-running branch outside master. Eval fixes do not reach master, so
master-based eval runs use old setups and graders.

**Subsystem affected**
`tests/runner-e2e` chat catalog harness, plus a small set of product
changes that exist only on the candidate.

**Proposed change**
Land the harness on master. Every product fix from this eval work
already merged to master as its own pull request. Conflicts keep
master's product behavior.

## What Changed

- Most of the diff (808 of 851 files) is under `tests/runner-e2e/`:
chat-catalog domains, scenarios, descriptors, the TestOps manifest,
private evidence tooling, and their tests.
- Graders now check saved state, setup literals and rendered or clicked
links. Many keyword and regex checks on free-form replies are removed.
Each changed grader has a bumped `oracleVersion` and calibration tests
(a valid reply, a reworded valid reply, and broken variants that must
fail).
- The shared link helper `hasLink` no longer treats a list link (for
example `/COM/issues?view=mine`) as a link to every task without a URL
key.
- Setup fixes build real state through supported product routes: routine
history, agent grants through the board grant route, budget holds with a
real cap, and a storage-layer archive fault for
`inbox-search.archive-partial-failure`.
- Browser boundary journeys (sign-in, chat-disabled, onboarding) now
write the standard pass evidence files.
- Retargeted cases, approved by the maintainer:
`agent-chat.chat-disabled` (Conference Room gate),
`agents.restore-instructions` (no saved instruction history),
`access.manage-membership` (member permission edits stay board-only).
- The private evidence trusted files (`manual-private-handoff.ts`,
`manual-private-retention.ts`, `manual-private-report-assets.ts`) are
byte-identical to master.
- Product files outside `tests/` (43 files, +1,328 −49) carry
candidate-only changes that master does not yet have. Most are tests.
The main code changes are in `request-human-input.ts`,
`heartbeat-run-summary.ts`, `native-completion-feedback.ts`,
`native-run-finalizer.ts`, `openapi.ts`, `secrets.ts` and
`IssueChatLongThreadPerf.tsx`.

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run chat-catalog-domains chat-catalog-contract.test.ts
chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts unit-launcher.test.mjs
--testTimeout=180000` in `tests/runner-e2e`: 269 files pass, 3,550 tests
pass.
- `node --test chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs`: 10 pass.
- `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`:
no change.
- `tsc` for `server` and `tests/runner-e2e`: clean.
- Live single-case verification: 139 of 242 cases passed on paid runs,
and a person read the saved evidence for each. These are single-case
runs, not one full-cohort run.

## Risks

- Large diff. Most of it is test-only, but the 43 non-test files change
product code paths. Review those files first.
- Some graders are now less strict on reply wording. A person must read
replies for meaning on those cases.
- 42 cases need disposable outside accounts (Notion, Slack, GitHub,
Daytona and others) and stay blocked. `access.invite-teammate` stays
failing until local agent isolation lands, because the runner's durable
state keeps a live invite token.
- The paid workflow compares the trusted private-evidence files with
master. They are unchanged, so this risk is low.

## Model Used

Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code
execution, in Claude Code. Subagents used the same model.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-10 08:02:11 -06:00

121 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript

import { expect, it } from "vitest";
import { gradeChatCatalogRuns, chatCatalogAllowedRunStatuses, assertExpectedWorkerCancellation, chatCatalogRunStatusAllowed, createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier, chatCatalogNeverStartedTerminalTaskRun } from "./chat-catalog-run-policy.js";
import type { ChatRun } from "./chat-flow.js";
const succeeded: ChatRun = { id: "source-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "ceo", status: "succeeded", runtimeMode: "native", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "source" } };
const worker: ChatRun = { id: "worker-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "worker", status: "running", runtimeMode: "native", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "task" } };
const scope = { companyId: "company", leadId: "ceo", source: { id: "source", companyId: "company", title: "Chat", status: "in_review", conversationState: "waiting" } };
it("requires successful native work by default and exact declared cancellation counts", () => {
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { expectedRunCount: 1 }, runs: [succeeded] }).passed).toBe(true);
const cancelled = { ...succeeded, status: "cancelled" };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { expectedRunCount: 1 }, runs: [cancelled] }).passed).toBe(false);
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 1, runPolicy: { kind: "terminal-counts" as const, terminalStatusCounts: { cancelled: 1 } } };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [cancelled] }).passed).toBe(true);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded] }).passed).toBe(false);
});
it("admits declared separate active work while rejecting active CEO, wrong scope, unbound and excess work", () => {
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 2, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, worker] }).passed).toBe(true);
for (const bad of [{ ...succeeded, status: "running" }, { ...worker, companyId: "other" }, { ...worker, contextSnapshot: {} }, { ...worker, agentId: "ceo" }])
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, bad] }).passed).toBe(false);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, worker, { ...worker, id: "extra" }] }).passed).toBe(false);
});
function reassignment() {
const receipt = { runId: "worker-run", taskId: "task", workerId: "worker", sourceRunId: "final-source" };
const stopped: ChatRun = { ...worker, status: "cancelled", errorCode: "issue_reassigned", resultJson: {
reassignmentStopConfirmed: true, nativeCancellation: { schema: "paperclip.native-cancellation.v1", runId: "worker-run", issueId: "task", companyId: "company", dispatchState: "acknowledged", acknowledgedAt: "2026-10-27T10:00:00Z", intentAuditId: "intent", acknowledgementAuditId: "ack" },
} };
const implementation = { scenarioId: "tasks.edit-properties", expectedRunCount: 4, minimumRunCount: 3,
runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1, expectedWorkerCancellation: "owned-task-reassignment" as const },
expectedCancelledWorkerRun: (observation: unknown) => (observation as { proofComplete?: boolean } | undefined)?.proofComplete ? receipt : undefined };
const observation = { proofComplete: true, state: { heldRun: { ...worker }, heldTask: { id: "task", companyId: "company", assigneeAgentId: "worker", executionRunId: "worker-run" }, riley: { id: "worker" } } };
return { implementation, stopped, receipt, observation, runs: [succeeded, { ...succeeded, id: "final-source" }, stopped] };
}
it("defers only the declared worker cancellation during polling and requires final independent proof", () => {
const v = reassignment();
expect(chatCatalogAllowedRunStatuses(v.implementation)).toContain("cancelled");
expect(chatCatalogRunStatusAllowed({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, run: v.stopped, observation: { ...v.observation, proofComplete: false } })).toBe(true);
for (const run of [{ ...v.stopped, id: "other" }, { ...v.stopped, agentId: "ceo" }, { ...v.stopped, companyId: "foreign" }, { ...v.stopped, errorCode: "user_cancelled" }])
expect(chatCatalogRunStatusAllowed({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, run, observation: v.observation })).toBe(false);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: v.runs }).passed).toBe(false);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: v.runs, observation: v.observation }).passed).toBe(true);
// No cancellation remains a valid genuine ownership-denied branch; no proof is invented.
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: [succeeded, { ...succeeded, id: "final-source" }, worker] }).passed).toBe(true);
});
it("rejects wrong cancellation identities, scope, reason, acknowledgement and unrelated cancelled work", () => {
const mutations = [
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.runId = "unrelated"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.taskId = "other-task"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.workerId = "other-worker"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.sourceRunId = "unrelated-source"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.companyId = "foreign"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.agentId = "ceo"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.errorCode = "user_cancelled"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.resultJson!.reassignmentStopConfirmed = false; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { (v.stopped.resultJson!.nativeCancellation as Record<string, unknown>).dispatchState = "pending"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { (v.stopped.resultJson!.nativeCancellation as Record<string, unknown>).issueId = "other-task"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.runs.push({ ...v.stopped, id: "another-cancelled-run" }); },
];
for (const mutate of mutations) { const v = reassignment(); mutate(v); expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: v.runs, observation: v.observation }).passed).toBe(false); }
});
it("requires exact scenario/flag/callback and leaves every undeclared active-work case unchanged", () => {
const v = reassignment();
expect(() => assertExpectedWorkerCancellation(v.implementation)).not.toThrow();
for (const implementation of [
{ ...v.implementation, scenarioId: "tasks.assignment-conflict" },
{ ...v.implementation, expectedCancelledWorkerRun: undefined },
{ ...v.implementation, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } },
]) { expect(() => assertExpectedWorkerCancellation(implementation)).toThrow(); expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: v.runs, observation: v.observation }).passed).toBe(false); }
expect(chatCatalogAllowedRunStatuses({ runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work", maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } })).not.toContain("cancelled");
});
it("binds cancellation proof presence through the actual lazy registry loader", async () => {
const { loadChatCatalogImplementation } = await import("./chat-catalog-registry.js");
const v = reassignment(); const { expectedCancelledWorkerRun, ...metadata } = v.implementation;
const descriptor = { ...metadata, modulePath: "./chat-catalog-domains/internal-tasks.js", exportName: "cases", sourceFiles: ["chat-catalog-domains/internal-edit-ownership.ts"], oracleVersion: "test", turnTimeoutMs: 120_000, attemptTimeoutMs: 600_000 };
const implementation = { ...descriptor, expectedCancelledWorkerRun, setup: async () => ({}), observe: async () => ({}), grade: () => ({ passed: true, checks: [{ id: "actual-proof", passed: true, detail: "Fixture-only registry control" }] }), verifyResult: async () => {} };
await expect(loadChatCatalogImplementation(descriptor, async () => ({ cases: [implementation] }))).resolves.toBe(implementation);
await expect(loadChatCatalogImplementation(descriptor, async () => ({ cases: [{ ...implementation, expectedCancelledWorkerRun: undefined }] }))).rejects.toThrow("cancellation proof");
const wrongDescriptor = { ...descriptor, scenarioId: "tasks.assignment-conflict" };
await expect(loadChatCatalogImplementation(wrongDescriptor, async () => ({ cases: [{ ...implementation, scenarioId: wrongDescriptor.scenarioId }] }))).rejects.toThrow("cancellation proof");
});
it("retains the executable cancellation proof at the outer final-run boundary", () => {
const v = reassignment();
const verify = createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier({ implementation: v.implementation, companyId: scope.companyId,
leadId: scope.leadId, observation: v.observation });
expect(verify(scope.source, v.runs).passed).toBe(true);
// JSON declarations cannot replace the executable independent proof callback.
expect(() => createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier({ implementation: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(v.implementation)),
companyId: scope.companyId, leadId: scope.leadId, observation: v.observation })).toThrow("cancellation proof");
for (const run of [
{ ...v.stopped, errorCode: "user_cancelled" },
{ ...v.stopped, companyId: "foreign" },
{ ...v.stopped, resultJson: { ...v.stopped.resultJson, nativeCancellation: { ...(v.stopped.resultJson!.nativeCancellation as object), dispatchState: "pending" } } },
]) expect(verify(scope.source, v.runs.map(row => row.id === run.id ? run : row)).passed).toBe(false);
expect(verify(scope.source, [...v.runs, { ...v.stopped, id: "new-cancellation" }]).passed).toBe(false);
expect(verify({ ...scope.source, id: "different-source" }, v.runs).passed).toBe(false);
});
it("keeps an ordinary ownership-denial boundary strict without a cancellation declaration", () => {
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 2,
runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } };
const verify = createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier({ implementation, companyId: scope.companyId,
leadId: scope.leadId, observation: undefined });
expect(verify(scope.source, [succeeded, worker]).passed).toBe(true);
expect(verify(scope.source, [succeeded, { ...worker, status: "cancelled" }]).passed).toBe(false);
});
it("treats only a never-started run cancelled by its own task's terminal status as lifecycle, and still grades it", () => {
// Shape recorded for tasks.website-task: the agent cancelled its own stray task before the queued run started.
const queued: ChatRun = { id: "stray-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "ceo", status: "cancelled", runtimeMode: "legacy", startedAt: null,
errorCode: "issue_terminal_status", error: "Cancelled because issue reached terminal status (cancelled) before the queued run could start",
resultJson: { stopReason: "issue_terminal_status", timeoutFired: false }, contextSnapshot: { issueId: "stray-task", wakeReason: "issue_assigned" } };
expect(chatCatalogNeverStartedTerminalTaskRun(queued, scope.source)).toBe(true);
for (const run of [{ ...queued, startedAt: "2026-11-09T15:27:00Z" }, { ...queued, errorCode: "user_cancelled" }, { ...queued, status: "failed" },
{ ...queued, resultJson: {} }, { ...queued, contextSnapshot: { issueId: "source" } }, { ...queued, contextSnapshot: {} }])
expect(chatCatalogNeverStartedTerminalTaskRun(run, scope.source)).toBe(false);
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 3, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, worker, queued] }).passed).toBe(false);
});