Files
PaperClipAI/maps/feature-map/onboarding.md
T
DottaandPaperclip 59e191c368 Limit first onboarding to Claude and Codex (#18309)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - First onboarding helps a new user connect the first agent.
> - Its provider picker currently includes GitHub Copilot.
> - The first setup should offer only Claude and Codex.
> - This pull request limits that picker to those two providers.
> - Users can still choose other providers when they add more agents.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

The model-source picker in first-agent onboarding.

**Subsystem affected**

`ui/` — the onboarding wizard and its tests.

**Current behavior**

First onboarding offers GitHub Copilot. It can also expose other
providers when their display metadata marks them as recommended.

**Proposed behavior**

Show only enabled Claude and Codex choices in first onboarding. Keep
their automatic native-runner routing on qualified execution
environments and the silent legacy fallback on native Windows, with the
same provider UI. Keep all supported providers in the later Add Agent
flow. Require a visible provider choice when an old draft names a
provider that is no longer offered.

**Reason and benefit**

Keep the first setup focused while preserving provider choice for an
existing company.

**Breaking changes**

Old Copilot or other provider drafts require a new choice in first
onboarding. Existing agents, provider APIs, and the Add Agent flow keep
their current behavior.

**Additional context**

Related provider setup work: #15562. This change only narrows the
first-onboarding picker. Searches for onboarding/Copilot and
first-onboarding PRs found no duplicate change. This is a small
improvement to the existing setup flow, consistent with ROADMAP.md.

## What Changed

- Limit first-onboarding adapters to Claude and Codex, with existing
availability checks.
- Remove the Copilot tile, login card, connection state, model
discovery, and creation guards from first onboarding.
- Retain only migration handling for old Copilot drafts: clear the
retired selection/model/flag, restore automatic runner choice, and avoid
reusing GitHub bindings when the user selects Claude or Codex. This also
works when both onboarding providers are disabled.
- Update coverage for provider choices, disabled adapters, and old
Copilot and Gemini drafts.
- Clear the model when an unavailable saved provider changes to Codex.
- Explain how to proceed when both first-onboarding providers are
unavailable.
- Update the onboarding feature and access maps.
- Document the Windows fallback beside automatic runner discovery, with
an explicit note to default Windows to native when its runner support is
qualified. This inline migration note is an explicit requirement of the
change.
- Extend both providers' setup coverage for native and legacy
availability without forcing a runtime from the browser.

## Verification

- 282 tests passed across all onboarding component/route tests and
`NewAgentDialog.test.tsx`. This includes the separate adapter-draft
suite that CI identified as still expecting Copilot in first onboarding.
- The existing server runner-selection suite passed: 231 tests,
including native Claude/Codex runtime translation and Windows legacy
fallback. This is automated routing coverage; no native Windows
end-to-end run is claimed.
- UI TypeScript checks and the production UI build passed.
- Token gates, feature/access map validation, module-boundary checks,
and `git diff --check` passed.
- Reviewer command from `ui/`: `pnpm exec vitest run
src/components/OnboardingWizard.test.tsx
src/components/OnboardingWizard.adapters.test.tsx
src/components/OnboardingWizard.step.test.tsx
src/components/OnboardingWizardVariant.test.tsx
src/components/NewAgentDialog.test.tsx
src/lib/onboarding-route.test.ts`.
- A separate browser walkthrough on staging completed the Add Agent flow
with Codex and confirmed Copilot remained available. That walkthrough
used an existing deployment; it does not prove this branch's
first-onboarding change.
- Ponytail Paperclip Review and Greptile both scored the latest commit
`b470f7023ecb6657bd77edefbcaf2ab12fd89414` 5/5. All review threads are
resolved.
- All latest-head PR checks are complete: 55 passed and 3
neutral/skipped, with no failures or pending checks. Two server shards
passed on a single retry after an unchanged timing-sensitive test
exceeded its limit and a self-hosted runner lost its connection. No code
or test changes were made for the retry.

## Risks

- Low scope: the provider filter belongs only to the onboarding wizard.
Native Windows runner support is still unmerged (#18250 is only its
build/CI baseline), so automatic selection must retain the existing
legacy fallback. Platform selection is based on the execution target,
not the browser OS.
- Users with an old draft for another provider must choose Claude or
Codex. Existing agent configuration is not removed.
- Instances that disable both providers have no first-onboarding choice.
The wizard explains how to enable a provider or use New Agent from the
Agents page.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact runtime model ID and
context-window size are not exposed in this session. Capabilities used:
reasoning, repository edits, shell commands, and browser UI
verification.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 10:04:38 -05:00

16 KiB
Raw Blame History

navigation
navigation
section sectionOrder order
Getting started and access 10 10

Onboarding and first work

An operator can start an instance, create a company, configure its first agent, and reach a real first task. Instance setup and company onboarding are separate steps.

Feature ID: onboarding.

Implementation: web wizard, CLI setup.

Agent access: companion.

Sub-features

  • instance: onboarding/instance — choose local instance configuration and start the server.

  • company: onboarding/company — create a company with its identity and initial agent.

  • adapter: onboarding/adapter — choose an available harness, model, account, and execution environment.

  • first-task: onboarding/first-task — leave setup with a task whose execution or missing prerequisite is visible.

  • resume: onboarding/resume — return to an incomplete wizard without losing saved state.

The Cloud Product onboarding journey defines portal workspace creation, API-key connection, native Codex creation, and a first downloadable artifact with an independent oracle. Its dependent task-properties journey reuses onboarding state. This is a scripted coverage recipe, not a claim of a completed Cloud run or strict browser-only discovery.

How to get to it (user POV)

web-wizard

Open /onboarding or the onboarding launcher in an empty company context. Use /<company-prefix>/onboarding to resume an existing company's agent setup; the unprefixed route starts at organization naming on self-hosted instances. Cloud-managed instances reuse their existing company for agent setup.

First-agent onboarding offers only Claude and Codex, subject to instance adapter availability. GitHub Copilot and other providers remain available through Add agent after onboarding. A saved draft for another provider requires a new choice. Old Copilot drafts discard the retired selection and model, including when both onboarding providers are disabled. The wizard no longer contains Copilot setup UI, connection state, or model discovery; later Add agent retains that support. Changing an unavailable saved provider clears its model. If both first-onboarding providers are unavailable, the wizard explains how to enable one or use New Agent from the Agents page for another provider. Claude and Codex are harness choices, not a forced legacy runtime. Automatic runner selection uses the execution environment's qualified native runner and falls back to legacy on native Windows without changing the onboarding UI. Windows should default to native when its runner platform support is qualified.

cli-setup

Use paperclipai onboard --help or paperclipai run --help to select an isolated data directory before setup.

Driving it with Playwright and the Paperclip CLI

Preconditions: follow the baseline. Use a new isolated data directory and record deployment mode. A configured adapter may still need account authentication.

web-wizard

Automated: wizard tests cover mocked wizard behavior; onboarding browser suite supplies its own test environment. Live model execution is a separate check.

The published canary smoke checks the exact installed version through Connect a model. Submitting the agent name must save one paused setup record with disabled heartbeats and no task or run. The authenticated release smoke checks the same held state, then completes that record through Connect without creating a second agent. Its Docker harness mocks credential verification; live provider authentication remains separate evidence.

Name-only setup defers the runner field while the provisional adapter remains held in setup. Choosing a provider updates that same setup record with its selected runner. The wizard regression covers a saved native choice followed by OpenAI Subscription selection; it does not prove provider authentication.

  • Create company and resume. Start a fresh empty instance and run doctor using the verification skill. Run node .agents/skills/verify-paperclip/scripts/onboarding-smoke.mjs --evidence-dir "$VERIFY_EVIDENCE_DIR". The helper opens /onboarding in a fresh self-hosted instance, enters a unique name in e.g. Northwind Labs, and chooses Continue. The agent-name field must appear and the saved company must have no invented goal. Reopen the company-prefixed onboarding route and reload; the agent step must appear without creating another company. Screenshots and a trace capture the real UI action and result. This proves company creation/resumption, not hiring or a first model run.

Manual: Create a disposable company and first agent. Leave midway, reopen the company's onboarding route, and finish; drafts save automatically. Follow the created first task, verify the selected agent and company, and inspect its output or explicit authentication gate. Reload both company and task.

For Codex or Claude, choose the harness and leave runner selection automatic to prove the first-agent default. On a qualified target it saves Paperclip Runner; Advanced also permits Legacy. Do not switch runners after onboarding when claiming proof of that default. Test the selected runtime and account, then complete a bounded useful task and follow-up with an independently checked file artifact. Saved execution configuration and recorded run identity must match after reload. The Codex first-task eval applies operator QA bounds before Get started through the existing agent configuration API. It verifies that only timeout and concurrency change; automatic runner, account and environment choices remain. These campaign bounds are separate from production creation defaults. Use runner validation and environment qualification for the prerequisites; a successful login alone is insufficient.

For managed Cloud setup, an outdated default Claude CLI is prepared automatically in a private versioned runtime directory before its hello test. Verify that the selected model and account stay unchanged and that the compatible executable is actually used. A failed installation still blocks hiring. Cloud failures must not display Manual debug shell commands or legacy operator hints; self-hosted failures retain that help. Wizard controls and runtime controls cover these boundaries. They do not establish live Cloud onboarding success.

For a new Claude agent on an explicit immutable sandbox image or a Daytona named snapshot, use Connect to qualify the selected environment through the existing permission-gated probe. Do not preprobe outside onboarding when claiming this first-use path. Fresh scoped discovery determines the runner for both the account test and hire; the measured Legacy result remains valid. An instance-admin denial, incomplete cleanup, missing lease or changed configuration stops setup before the adapter test or hire. Daytona resolves the selected snapshot to its immutable provider ID before creating the measured lease; native execution pins that same ID. Mutable image tags and other providers’ named templates remain unqualified. Helper controls and mounted wizard/new-agent tests use mocks; live managed acceptance remains a separate gate. For a new Codex agent with Auto on a saved immutable OCI sandbox, Connect first uses the existing saved environment probe when authoritative qualification is absent. The board actor needs the existing instance-environment administration permission. Refresh company/environment-scoped discovery before testing the selected runtime. A denied probe, unconfirmed cleanup or setup failure must be visible; selecting Legacy remains an explicit choice. Creation and discovery themselves allocate no target. A valid measured unsupported target follows the server's Legacy default. Named Cloud snapshots remain a separate unqualified boot-identity and fresh-signup gap.

Selected native setup derives its target isolation as task execution does. The hello probe retains its read-only permission profile, approval-never policy and bounded provider turn. It skips Codex's project-instruction discovery in its new, empty private workspace; ordinary tasks still load their project instructions. Local and SSH transports retain Codex isolation. An injected environment flag cannot establish an outer sandbox identity. Verify these boundaries with the existing native setup controls and a real managed task/follow-up; source checks alone are insufficient.

The explicit manual Product E2E cell confirmation-replies.runner-codex.daytona.task-card-accept covers this fresh managed wizard path without fixture agent creation or a fixture preprobe. Its existing attachment oracle checks a downloaded physical file and follow-up continuity. Setup evidence must correlate both lease IDs with the same company, environment and provider; missing responses or unmatched rows keep cost coverage unknown. Run this cell only on an eligible target with separately authorized provider, runtime and cleanup reservations. Its source and mock controls are prepared. The literal ea6c8eb5e16d61111968f633a66748b397b64a3e live attempt failed: the child document existed, but the physical file was attached to the parent, and recovery stopped the completion callback before a provider turn. The failed report remains evidence; the revised source still needs live proof. Local cases and automatic selection remain unchanged.

First-task task creation enforces proposal acceptance at the shared server boundary. Verify that native create_task and both REST creation endpoints reject an authenticated onboarding run before its latest proposal has a saved human acceptance, including an explicit standalone parent. Then accept a confirmation or the current plan revision and verify creation succeeds. Opening answers, agent-only acceptance, stale plans and newer pending/rejected proposals must not admit new work. Admission controls exercise native and REST calls against disposable PostgreSQL; live model and Cloud onboarding remain separate evidence.

For a native proposal, reject root-level version or supersedeOnUserComment without creating a card. Correct them inside payload, preserve the confirmation or checkbox approval kind, and verify one pending card after idempotent replay. An answered question form still cannot authorize the proposed child task.

After acceptance, reject a new task whose blockers include its onboarding source. The rejected command must leave no task, dependency, wake or creation receipt; a corrected retry must still create the ready child. Preserve valid blockers for other work. Check equivalent UUID spellings and a later child PATCH as well as native dependency edits, including the child's own run with a waiting parent and no first-class dependency yet. Preserve normal API attempt auditing and allow blocker corrections without a new proposal acceptance. The shipped handoff recipe copies the actual approved inputs and constraints into the child, then makes the parent depend on the child. Its schema and persistence controls do not prove that a live model follows it.

Native completion also requires a saved human proposal decision. An opening answer alone must leave the first task in review. Verify that premature native completion is refused, including a result already saved before finalization. Accepted proposals and acknowledged human rejections can close the first task; rejection still does not authorize new tasks. The native completion controls exercise these boundaries against disposable PostgreSQL. These controls do not identify a historical Cloud failure or establish live onboarding success.

For accepted file-producing work, verify exactly one self-assigned child with a self-contained description. The onboarding run must yield through the existing dependency/block disposition so the child's own execution can publish its file. Native file registration remains bound to the executing task. On completion, the original conversation must receive the actual child and downloadable file links. Document-only child work may finish inline; a plan-only request must not start implementation. Existing first-task asset controls check the instructions, not model compliance. Inspect the child's execution, document, downloaded file and source-correlated completion reply in the real journey.

Leave and resume during harness/runner setup. Confirm the draft retains the explicit choice and compatible account bindings, old native Codex setup links recover the harness and runner, and a changed harness or runner invalidates stale test results. Existing Legacy agents remain Legacy when their onboarding/setup configuration is reopened; this journey does not migrate them.

Reload both /onboarding and the company-prefixed route after the first agent is saved but before Get started. The authorized draft must retain its current step and that agent's execution choice. An explicit new-company opening still starts fresh. Opening another company must clear the previous company's resource IDs; an unauthorized account must not restore its draft. Existing component controls cover these boundaries; they do not substitute for the managed first-task eval. The existing mocked-login browser case reopens and reloads Connect directly. It checks the saved company/name/harness/runner, exact active authorization session, one login start and no hire while login is pending. This is login UI evidence, not a provider or managed-environment qualification.

cli-setup

Automated: CLI onboarding and isolated test drive cover their setup contracts; they do not establish that every model account is usable.

Manual: Run setup in the disposable directory, open the URL it prints, and confirm the instance identity and company. Restart using that same configuration and verify saved state. Exercise an unavailable adapter and confirm an actionable error.

Gotchas

  • An empty company, an empty instance, and an unauthenticated browser are different states.
  • Creating an agent does not prove its provider login or first execution succeeded.
  • See access for authenticated deployments and agents for later hiring.

Storybook verification

resume

Capability ID: onboarding/resume.

Scope: ui Storybook: Restored incomplete wizard; invalid or unauthorized saved company; temporarily withheld draft; account switch; storage failure. Production: Reload company-prefixed onboarding without duplicating company; restore only authorized account/company draft and retain input after recoverable loading failure. Sources: Source: OnboardingWizard.tsx, onboarding-state.ts. Tests: OnboardingWizard.test.tsx, onboarding-state.test.ts, onboarding.spec.ts

instance

Capability ID: onboarding/instance.

Scope: cli Storybook: No authored UI story required for host installation and startup. Production: Configure isolated data directory, start instance, confirm printed URL/identity/health, restart with saved configuration. Sources: Source: onboard.ts, onboard-service.ts. Tests: onboard.test.ts, onboard-service.test.ts, test-drive.test.ts

Documentation scope: Login, invitations, and access

Deployment modes and core login/invite/member/token paths are mapped; exhaustive identity-provider, expiry, role, and resource-policy combinations remain.