Files
PaperClipAI/tests/runner-e2e/chat-completion-testops-api.test.mjs
T
Dotta e122478368 test(evals): run and record the chat completion pilot through TestOps (#18516)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip evals must verify real user outcomes.
> - A passing manual pilot does not make its cases runnable from
TestOps.
> - The existing TestOps adapter owns one separate backlog case.
> - The three-case completion pilot needs its own exact selection and
reporting path.
> - This workflow binds a real TestOps job run to reviewed catalog
source and AWS execution.
> - Results retain their original verdict, checks, source and private
evidence.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18364, #18377, #18515 and #18509. This is the main-side companion
to merged #18515. The immutable evaluated source is its actual
integration-branch squash merge,
`de0941835cc8f0d01c982574ee258e110babdbeb`; its tree matches the
reviewed catalog head. The host admission remains inert until this
main-only workflow exists. The broader catalog stays off master.

The existing TestOps connection can run only the separate backlog cell.
The project-work, project-defaults and instance-restart cases currently
require manual campaign dispatch and private retrieval. This change
creates a dedicated reusable TestOps plan and records fresh execution
outcomes there. Source checks and registration do not establish a new
live pass.

## What Changed

- Add a default-branch-only workflow with exact TestOps selection,
immutable source/build outputs, serial AWS execution and zero eval
retries. No source/model/budget selector is accepted.
- Register the three exact reusable cases and a separate plan with the
existing reviewed GitHub integration. Preserve opaque job definitions.
Validate the observed single Branch/defaultValue carrier, PATCH only
enable/integration, and use the job’s default branch without rewriting
its definition or adding plan overrides. Fence the initial operator
launch by actual GitHub run number and nonce; normal TestOps Run remains
repeatable.
- Reuse the existing private-evidence authority, scanners, bounds and
exact-key S3 policies. Authenticated selection supplies only this
original attempt's exact source and case identity. The three trusted
protocol files are unchanged.
- Skip report retrieval after an unsuccessful build or skipped
execution; retain evidence and failed grades when evaluation actually
ran.
- Check out trusted main after the target in both build and execution
jobs, and reject any target tree containing the reserved trusted-helper
path. A real temporary-Git-tree regression exercises the actual YAML
guard.
- Keep reporting credentials in separate protected jobs. Export only
closed verdict/check/accounting metadata and private-evidence receipts
to TestOps. Verify final PNGs privately and record their checksums; keep
all screenshot bytes in protected AWS storage and out of public GitHub
artifacts. Preserve failed grades and failed cleanup.
- Verify actual same-run case results and complete result-owned
attachment metadata within a fixed processing window. Missing or
inherited attachments never qualify. Keep source/result links and stable
case identities.

## Verification

- 68 dispatch, selection, registration and readback controls pass. A
checkout-boundary regression fails on the old ordering, accepts an
ordinary target and rejects a candidate-owned helper tree before trusted
checkout. They cover real workflow environment wiring, actual GitHub
metadata guards, exact subset selection, wrong sources/cases/jobs,
replays and attachment readiness.
- 38 exporter controls pass, including the existing backlog exporter and
the unchanged private-evidence authority consumer. Red/green controls
prove project work accepts the catalog’s 1–3 run range in both export
gates, while 0/4 runs are rejected; the actual pinned-source control
verifies all three cases’ run bounds. Cancelled, failed and scheduled
TestOps job stages are rejected even with complete results. The three
new cases retain all 35 independent checks; private diagnostics and all
image bytes are excluded from the public artifact. Extra media files and
directories are rejected.
- The actual checked-in workflow environment is exercised against the
actual pinned source matrix and host function for all three cases before
provider access. Local fixture controls make zero provider calls and do
not claim live AWS qualification.
- All 71 workflow-policy controls pass. Actionlint and owning typecheck
pass. Relevant TypeScript build dependencies pass.
- Full support suite: 5,827 passed, 13 failed, four skipped. A clean
unchanged-master baseline reproduces all 13 failures in the same five
files. They include fixture expectation drift, operating-receipt
fixtures, a profile pin, pnpm bootstrap counts and local database
startup. This change updates the exact TestOps workflow registries; the
two affected boundary controls now pass. Baseline failures remain
retained and are not presented as a green full support suite.
- The catalog dependency passed CI and current-head 5/5 review, has no
unresolved threads, and is merged. All current-head CI checks pass; both
Greptile and Paperclip reviews are 5/5, with no unresolved threads. No
new TestOps mutation, provider call or passing launch is claimed yet. A
fresh three-case TestOps launch and verified server-side results remain
the delivery gate.

## Risks

This is a paid execution and reporting boundary. The new workflow
accepts only trusted default-branch actor identities and a verified
project/plan/job/case selection. Its evaluated source is immutable and
separate from main reporting code. The full catalog is not promoted.
Screenshots, raw evidence and hidden provider data stay in protected
storage. Public GitHub artifacts carry only the closed metadata
projection. TestOps receives checks and private-evidence
availability/checksum receipts. Unknown setup or AWS accounting stays
unknown. One passing launch will not establish full-catalog reliability.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository inspection, code execution
and tool use. Exact hosted revision and context-window size are not
exposed.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-11-01 06:09:47 -06:00

276 lines
19 KiB
JavaScript

import test from 'node:test';
import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
import { cases, targetSha, planName } from './chat-completion-testops-contract.mjs';
import { validatePilotSelection, verifyPilotUpload, bootstrapPilotPlan, completePilotRegistration, launchPilotPlan } from './chat-completion-testops-api.mjs';
const selected = cases.map((row, i) => ({ ...row, caseId: 100 + i }));
const context = { runId: '123', attempt: '1', workflowSha: 'a'.repeat(40), targetSha, operation: 'evaluate' };
const binding = { planId: 10, jobId: 11, integrationId: 2, cases: selected };
const env = { ALLURE_JOB_RUN_ID: '77', CHAT_COMPLETION_TESTOPS_BINDING: JSON.stringify(binding) };
const selection = { schema: 'paperclip.chat-completion-testops-selection/v1', ...context, projectId: 1,
planId: 10, jobId: 11, allureJobRunId: '77', launchId: 12, cases: selected };
const runUrl = 'https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/123';
const plan = { id: 10, name: 'Chat completion pilot — OpenCode 1017', projectId: 1, testCasesCount: 3,
treeSelection: { inverted: false, leafsInclude: selected.map(row => row.caseId) } };
const job = { id: 11, type: 'github', url: 'https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/workflows/chat-completion-testops.yml' };
const jobrun = { id: 77, job, launchId: 12, stage: 'in_progress', url: runUrl };
const attachment = { id: 900, name: 'Execution provenance and checks', contentType: 'application/json', contentLength: 100,
missed: false, fromTestCase: false };
const screenshot = { ...attachment, id: 901, name: 'Private evidence receipt', contentType: 'application/json', contentLength: 1000 };
const exported = selected.map(row => ({ caseId: row.caseId, executionId: row.executionId, status: 'passed', cleanup: 'passed',
attachments: [attachment, screenshot].map(({ id, missed, fromTestCase, ...rest }) => rest) }));
// Observed TestOps job-definition carrier: Branch/defaultValue. This is
// distinct from the id/value carrier accepted by plan runtime overrides.
const branchDefinition = { id: 34, name: 'Branch', defaultValue: 'refs/heads/master' };
function mutationApi({ parameters = [branchDefinition], assignments = [], existingLaunch = false, uncertain = false } = {}) {
const calls = [], current = { ...job, parameters: structuredClone(parameters) };
let assigned = structuredClone(assignments);
const api = async (route, method = 'GET', body) => {
calls.push({ route, method, body });
if (route === '/api/jobrun/77') return { ...jobrun, stage: 'finished' };
if (route === '/api/launch/12') return { id: 12, projectId: 1 };
if (route === '/api/testplan/10') return plan;
if (route === '/api/job/11') {
if (method === 'PATCH') {
assert.deepEqual(body, { integrationId: 2, canRun: true });
current.canRun = true;
}
return structuredClone(current);
}
if (route === '/api/testplan/10/job') return structuredClone(assigned);
if (route === '/api/testplan/10/assign') {
assert.equal(method, 'POST');
assert.deepEqual(body, { jobId: 11, selection: { inverted: false, manual: false, leafsInclude: [100, 101, 102] } });
assigned = [{ job: structuredClone(current), testCasesCount: 3 }]; return null;
}
const selectedCase = selected.find(row => route === `/api/testcase/${row.caseId}`);
if (selectedCase) return { ...selectedCase, id: selectedCase.caseId, projectId: 1, automated: true };
if (route.startsWith('/api/launch?')) return { content: existingLaunch ? [{ id: 13 }] : [], totalPages: existingLaunch ? 1 : 0 };
if (route === '/api/testplan/10/run') {
assert.equal(method, 'POST');
if (uncertain) throw new Error('uncertain transport');
return { id: 13, projectId: 1, name: body.launchName };
}
assert.fail(route);
};
return { api, calls, current };
}
const prepared = { planId: 10, integrationId: 2, cases: selected };
const official = { jobRunId: '77', launchId: 12 };
const operatorEnv = { CHAT_COMPLETION_TESTOPS_BINDING: JSON.stringify(binding), GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER: '5',
CHAT_COMPLETION_TESTOPS_LAUNCH_RUN_NUMBER: '5', CHAT_COMPLETION_TESTOPS_LAUNCH_NONCE: 'ab'.repeat(16) };
test('registration preserves the observed Branch definition and binds only the owned three-case job', async () => {
const f = mutationApi(), markers = [];
const receipt = await completePilotRegistration(f.api, prepared, official, context, 999, async stage => markers.push(stage));
assert.deepEqual(receipt.binding.cases, selected);
assert.deepEqual(f.current.parameters, [branchDefinition]);
assert.deepEqual(markers, ['bind_owned_job', 'assign_plan']);
assert.deepEqual(f.calls.filter(row => row.method !== 'GET').map(row => row.route), ['/api/job/11', '/api/testplan/10/assign']);
});
for (const parameters of [[], [branchDefinition, { id: 35, name: 'operation', defaultValue: 'bootstrap' }], [{ id: 34, value: 'refs/heads/master' }]]) {
test(`registration rejects unreviewed parameter carrier/count ${JSON.stringify(parameters)} before writes`, async () => {
const f = mutationApi({ parameters });
await assert.rejects(completePilotRegistration(f.api, prepared, official, context, 999, async () => assert.fail('no mutation marker')));
assert.equal(f.calls.filter(row => row.method !== 'GET').length, 0);
});
}
for (const assignments of [[{ job: { id: 99 }, testCasesCount: 3 }], [{ job, testCasesCount: 2 }], [{ job, testCasesCount: 3 }, { job, testCasesCount: 3 }]]) {
test('registration rejects ambiguous assignments before writes', async () => {
const f = mutationApi({ assignments });
await assert.rejects(completePilotRegistration(f.api, prepared, official, context, 999, async () => assert.fail('no mutation marker')));
assert.equal(f.calls.filter(row => row.method !== 'GET').length, 0);
});
}
test('registration keeps an existing exact assignment without assigning it twice', async () => {
const f = mutationApi({ assignments: [{ job: { ...job, parameters: [branchDefinition] }, testCasesCount: 3 }] });
await completePilotRegistration(f.api, prepared, official, context, 999, async () => {});
assert.equal(f.calls.filter(row => row.route.endsWith('/assign')).length, 0);
});
test('bootstrap retains a closed observation before rejecting an unknown parameter shape', async () => {
const f = mutationApi({ parameters: [{ id: 34, name: 'PRIVATE_NAME', defaultValue: 'PRIVATE_DEFAULT', value: 'PRIVATE_VALUE' }] });
let observed;
await assert.rejects(completePilotRegistration(f.api, prepared, official, context, 999, async () => assert.fail('no mutation marker'), async value => { observed = value; }));
assert.equal(observed.qualification, 'inspection_only'); assert.equal(observed.jobId, 11);
assert.equal(observed.parameters[0].runtimeValuePresent, true);
assert.ok(!JSON.stringify(observed).includes('PRIVATE_'));
assert.equal(f.calls.filter(row => row.method !== 'GET').length, 0);
});
test('the fenced launcher requests one exact three-case TestOps launch', async () => {
const f = mutationApi({ assignments: [{ job, testCasesCount: 3 }] }), markers = [];
const receipt = await launchPilotPlan(f.api, operatorEnv, context, 999, async stage => markers.push(stage));
assert.deepEqual(receipt.caseIds, [100, 101, 102]); assert.deepEqual(markers, ['launch_plan']);
assert.deepEqual(f.calls.filter(row => row.method !== 'GET'), [{ route: '/api/testplan/10/run', method: 'POST', body: {
launchName: `${planName} · ${operatorEnv.CHAT_COMPLETION_TESTOPS_LAUNCH_NONCE}` } }]);
});
for (const changed of [{ GITHUB_RUN_NUMBER: '6' }, { CHAT_COMPLETION_TESTOPS_LAUNCH_NONCE: 'not-a-nonce' }, { CHAT_COMPLETION_TESTOPS_LAUNCH_RUN_NUMBER: '' }]) {
test(`launcher rejects its invalid fence before requests: ${Object.keys(changed)[0]}`, async () => {
const f = mutationApi();
await assert.rejects(launchPilotPlan(f.api, { ...operatorEnv, ...changed }, context, 999, async () => assert.fail('no marker')));
assert.equal(f.calls.length, 0);
});
}
test('launcher reconciles an existing nonce without requesting a second launch', async () => {
const f = mutationApi({ assignments: [{ job, testCasesCount: 3 }], existingLaunch: true });
await assert.rejects(launchPilotPlan(f.api, operatorEnv, context, 999, async () => assert.fail('no marker')));
assert.equal(f.calls.filter(row => row.method !== 'GET').length, 0);
});
for (const assignments of [[], [{ job: { id: 99 }, testCasesCount: 3 }], [{ job, testCasesCount: 2 }]]) {
test('launcher rejects an unbound or mismatched assignment without requesting work', async () => {
const f = mutationApi({ assignments });
await assert.rejects(launchPilotPlan(f.api, operatorEnv, context, 999, async () => assert.fail('no mutation marker')));
assert.equal(f.calls.filter(row => row.method !== 'GET').length, 0);
});
}
test('launcher rejects a changed default branch before requesting work', async () => {
const f = mutationApi({ assignments: [{ job, testCasesCount: 3 }], parameters: [{ ...branchDefinition, defaultValue: 'refs/heads/candidate' }] });
await assert.rejects(launchPilotPlan(f.api, operatorEnv, context, 999, async () => assert.fail('no mutation marker')));
assert.equal(f.calls.filter(row => row.method !== 'GET').length, 0);
});
test('an uncertain launch response is never automatically resent', async () => {
const f = mutationApi({ assignments: [{ job, testCasesCount: 3 }], uncertain: true }), seen = new Set();
const mark = async stage => { if (seen.has(stage)) throw new Error('already attempted'); seen.add(stage); };
await assert.rejects(launchPilotPlan(f.api, operatorEnv, context, 999, mark), /uncertain transport/);
await assert.rejects(launchPilotPlan(f.api, operatorEnv, context, 999, mark), /already attempted/);
assert.equal(f.calls.filter(row => row.method === 'POST').length, 1);
});
test('registration creates only the three missing cases and the dedicated plan after once markers', async () => {
const calls = []; let nextCase = 100;
const get = async (route, method = 'GET', body) => {
calls.push({ route, method, body });
if (route === '/api/integration/2/project/1') return { id: 2, projectId: 1, info: { type: 'github' }, disabled: false };
if (route.startsWith('/api/testcase?')) return { content: [], number: 0, totalPages: 0, totalElements: 0 };
if (route.startsWith('/api/testplan?')) return { content: [], totalPages: 0 };
if (route === '/api/testcase' && method === 'POST') return { ...body, id: nextCase++ };
if (route === '/api/testplan' && method === 'POST') return { ...plan, name: planName };
if (route === '/api/testplan/10') return plan;
assert.fail(route);
};
const value = await bootstrapPilotPlan(get, 2, async stage => calls.push({ marker: stage }));
assert.equal(value.cases.length, 3); assert.equal(value.planId, 10);
assert.equal(calls.filter(row => row.method === 'POST').length, 4);
for (const [i, row] of calls.entries()) if (row.method === 'POST') assert.ok(calls[i - 1].marker);
});
test('uncertain case creation is never automatically resent', async () => {
let writes = 0, markers = 0;
const get = async (route, method = 'GET') => {
if (method === 'POST') { writes++; throw new Error('uncertain transport'); }
if (route === '/api/integration/2/project/1') return { id: 2, projectId: 1, info: { type: 'github' }, disabled: false };
if (route.startsWith('/api/testcase?')) return { content: [], number: 0, totalPages: 0, totalElements: 0 };
if (route.startsWith('/api/testplan?')) return { content: [], totalPages: 0 };
assert.fail(route);
};
await assert.rejects(bootstrapPilotPlan(get, 2, async () => { markers++; }), /uncertain transport/);
assert.equal(writes, 1); assert.equal(markers, 1);
});
function api(replace = {}) {
const fixtures = {
'/api/testplan/10': plan, '/api/testplan/10/job': [{ job, testCasesCount: 3 }], '/api/job/11': job,
'/api/jobrun/77': jobrun, '/api/launch/12': { id: 12, projectId: 1, closed: false },
'/api/jobrun/77/plan?expected=true': selected.map(row => ({ id: row.caseId, selector: row.fullName })),
'/api/testresult?launchId=12&page=0&size=100': { content: selected.map((row, i) => ({ id: 200 + i, testCaseId: row.caseId })), totalElements: 3, totalPages: 1 },
};
for (const [i, row] of selected.entries()) {
fixtures[`/api/testcase/${row.caseId}`] = { id: row.caseId, fullName: row.fullName, projectId: 1, automated: true };
fixtures[`/api/testresult/${200 + i}`] = { id: 200 + i, testCaseId: row.caseId, fullName: row.fullName,
projectId: 1, launchId: 12, status: 'passed', links: [], jobRun: { id: 77, launchId: 12, url: runUrl, job } };
fixtures[`/api/testresult/attachment?testResultId=${200 + i}&page=0&size=100`] = { content: [attachment, screenshot], totalElements: 2, totalPages: 1 };
}
return async (route, method = 'GET') => {
assert.equal(method, 'GET'); assert.ok(Object.hasOwn(fixtures, route), route);
return typeof replace[route] === 'function' ? replace[route]() : structuredClone(replace[route] ?? fixtures[route]);
};
}
test('validates actual registered plan, job run and all three selected case identities', async () => {
const value = await validatePilotSelection(api(), env, context, 999);
assert.deepEqual(value.cases.map(row => row.executionId), cases.map(row => row.executionId));
assert.equal(value.targetSha, targetSha);
});
test('a genuine one-case selection executes only that case', async () => {
const value = await validatePilotSelection(api({ '/api/jobrun/77/plan?expected=true': [{ id: selected[2].caseId, selector: selected[2].fullName }] }), env, context, 999);
assert.deepEqual(value.cases.map(row => row.key), ['work']);
});
for (const kind of ['foreign-case', 'wrong-selector', 'duplicate-case', 'wrong-workflow', 'foreign-project', 'wrong-jobrun', 'wrong-plan-job']) {
test(`stops ${kind} before any provider work`, async () => {
const replacements = {};
if (kind === 'foreign-case') replacements['/api/jobrun/77/plan?expected=true'] = [{ id: 999, selector: selected[0].fullName }];
if (kind === 'wrong-selector') replacements['/api/jobrun/77/plan?expected=true'] = [{ id: 100, selector: selected[1].fullName }];
if (kind === 'duplicate-case') replacements['/api/jobrun/77/plan?expected=true'] = [{ id: 100, selector: selected[0].fullName }, { id: 100, selector: selected[0].fullName }];
if (kind === 'wrong-workflow') replacements['/api/job/11'] = { ...job, url: job.url.replace('chat-completion', 'foreign') };
if (kind === 'foreign-project') replacements['/api/launch/12'] = { id: 12, projectId: 2 };
if (kind === 'wrong-jobrun') replacements['/api/jobrun/77'] = { ...jobrun, url: runUrl + '4' };
if (kind === 'wrong-plan-job') replacements['/api/testplan/10/job'] = [{ job: { id: 12 }, testCasesCount: 3 }];
await assert.rejects(validatePilotSelection(api(replacements), env, context, 999));
});
}
test('verifies exact results and attachment metadata for all three cases', async () => {
const value = await verifyPilotUpload(api(), selection, context, exported);
assert.equal(value.verification, 'VERIFIED'); assert.equal(value.results.length, 3);
assert.ok(value.results.every(row => row.attachmentsVerified && row.status === 'passed'));
});
test('accepts a finished TestOps job with its original complete results', async () => {
const value = await verifyPilotUpload(api({ '/api/jobrun/77': { ...jobrun, stage: 'finished' } }), selection, context, exported);
assert.equal(value.verification, 'VERIFIED');
});
for (const stage of ['cancelled', 'failed', 'scheduled']) {
test(`never qualifies a ${stage} TestOps job even with all results and attachments`, async () => {
await assert.rejects(verifyPilotUpload(api({ '/api/jobrun/77': { ...jobrun, stage } }), selection, context, exported));
});
}
test('waits for an explicitly missing attachment and requires final complete metadata', async () => {
let polls = 0, slept = 0, clock = 0;
const get = api({ '/api/testresult/attachment?testResultId=200&page=0&size=100': () => {
polls++;
return { content: [{ ...attachment, missed: polls === 1 }, screenshot], totalElements: 2, totalPages: 1 };
} });
const value = await verifyPilotUpload(get, selection, context, exported, { now: () => clock, wait: async ms => { slept++; clock += ms; } });
assert.equal(value.verification, 'VERIFIED'); assert.equal(polls, 2); assert.equal(slept, 1);
});
test('permanently missing or inherited attachments never qualify', async () => {
for (const field of ['missed', 'fromTestCase']) {
let clock = 0;
const get = api({ '/api/testresult/attachment?testResultId=200&page=0&size=100': { content: [{ ...attachment, [field]: true }, screenshot], totalElements: 2, totalPages: 1 } });
await assert.rejects(verifyPilotUpload(get, selection, context, exported, { now: () => clock, wait: async ms => { clock += ms; } }));
assert.ok(clock < 120_000);
}
});
for (const kind of ['wrong-case', 'wrong-source-run', 'wrong-status', 'foreign-result', 'duplicate-result', 'extra-result', 'foreign-embedded-job', 'foreign-source-link']) {
test(`preserves failure for ${kind} during server result readback`, async () => {
const replacements = {};
if (kind === 'wrong-case') replacements['/api/testresult/200'] = { id: 200, testCaseId: 999 };
if (kind === 'wrong-source-run') replacements['/api/jobrun/77'] = { ...jobrun, url: runUrl + '4' };
if (kind === 'wrong-status') replacements['/api/testresult/200'] = { id: 200, testCaseId: 100, fullName: selected[0].fullName,
projectId: 1, launchId: 12, status: 'failed', links: [], jobRun: { id: 77, launchId: 12, url: runUrl, job } };
if (kind === 'foreign-embedded-job' || kind === 'foreign-source-link') replacements['/api/testresult/200'] = {
id: 200, testCaseId: 100, fullName: selected[0].fullName, projectId: 1, launchId: 12, status: 'passed',
links: kind === 'foreign-source-link' ? [{ url: 'https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/commit/' + 'b'.repeat(40) }] : [],
jobRun: { id: 77, launchId: 12, url: runUrl, job: kind === 'foreign-embedded-job' ? { ...job, type: 'foreign' } : job } };
if (kind === 'foreign-result') replacements['/api/testresult?launchId=12&page=0&size=100'] = { content: [{ id: 999, testCaseId: 999 }], totalElements: 1, totalPages: 1 };
if (kind === 'duplicate-result') replacements['/api/testresult?launchId=12&page=0&size=100'] = { content: [{ id: 200, testCaseId: 100 }, { id: 200, testCaseId: 100 }], totalElements: 2, totalPages: 1 };
if (kind === 'extra-result') replacements['/api/testresult?launchId=12&page=0&size=100'] = { content: selected.map((row, i) => ({ id: 200 + i, testCaseId: row.caseId })).concat({ id: 999, testCaseId: 999 }), totalElements: 4, totalPages: 1 };
await assert.rejects(verifyPilotUpload(api(replacements), selection, context, exported));
});
}