Files
PaperClipAI/packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip 8e7f1c03eb feat(decisions): improve desk triage and queue parity (#10785)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The decisions desk and queue help operators find work that needs a
human decision.
> - The current views use different grouping, sorting, and labels.
> - Repeated confirmation requests can also leave stale pending actions
in the queue.
> - Blocked-work attention can point at an intermediate issue instead of
the terminal blocker.
> - This pull request aligns the server contract and both user
interfaces.
> - The benefit is a smaller, clearer queue that ranks the decisions
with the largest impact.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related PR: #10774

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

The decisions desk and queue currently use different triage rules. They
can show stale repeated confirmations and can rank blocked work by an
intermediate issue.

**Subsystem affected**

This change affects attention aggregation, issue thread interactions,
shared attention contracts, and the decisions user interface.

**Current behavior**

The desk uses a can-wait group that has no clear arrival meaning. The
queue has fewer controls than the desk. Repeated pending confirmations
remain actionable. Blocked-work rows do not always identify the terminal
actionable blocker.

**Proposed behavior**

Group desk items by arrival date, and reserve Decide now for explicit
due dates. Use one toolbar and shelf model on both pages. Supersede
older repeated pending confirmations. Aggregate blocked work under the
terminal actionable blocker and rank it by impact.

**Reason and benefit**

Operators get one consistent triage model. The badge reflects new and
overdue work. High-impact blockers move to the top. Duplicate
confirmation work no longer consumes attention.

**Breaking changes**

The attention summary field `decideNowCount` changes to
`deskBadgeCount`. Consumers must use the new field. Older repeated
confirmation interactions can now finish with the
`superseded_by_newer_request` outcome.

## What Changed

- Supersede older pending confirmation requests for the same issue and
record the mutation in activity history.
- Resolve blocked-work attention to actionable terminal blockers,
suppress live blocker trees, and rank rows by blocked-work impact.
- Group the decisions desk into New today and Earlier, and count new
plus overdue work in the desk badge.
- Share the decision toolbar and shelf components across the desk and
queue.
- Add queue grouping, sorting, filtering, aging, visible training
controls, and clearer recommendation copy.
- Add server, shared-contract, and user-interface tests for the new
behavior.

## Verification

- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- `pnpm -r typecheck`
- `env -u AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID -u AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY pnpm test:run` (all
server, UI, CLI, shared, and catalog tests passed; one fixed five-second
DB timeout flaked under full-suite load)
- `NODE_ENV=test pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db exec vitest run
src/status-card-migrations.test.ts` (passed in isolation)
- `pnpm build`

## Risks

- The attention summary field rename requires synchronized consumers.
- Terminal-blocker traversal uses cycle and depth guards. A malformed
dependency graph can stop at the last safe node.
- The new arrival grouping changes which items contribute to the
decisions badge.
- Superseding repeated confirmations changes the terminal state of older
pending interactions.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. The runtime did not expose a dated model
snapshot or context-window size. The model used reasoning, repository
tools, code execution, and test execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-08-03 21:31:45 -05:00

477 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import {
acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
askUserQuestionsResultSchema,
createIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
requestConfirmationPayloadSchema,
requestConfirmationResultSchema,
submitIssueThreadInteractionVerdictsSchema,
} from "./validators/issue.js";
describe("issue thread interaction schemas", () => {
it("parses request_confirmation payloads with default no-wake continuation", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Apply this plan?",
acceptLabel: "Apply",
rejectLabel: "Revise",
rejectRequiresReason: true,
rejectReasonLabel: "What needs to change?",
declineReasonPlaceholder: "Optional: tell the agent what you'd change.",
detailsMarkdown: "The current plan document will be accepted as-is.",
supersedeOnUserComment: true,
},
});
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
kind: "request_confirmation",
continuationPolicy: "none",
payload: {
prompt: "Apply this plan?",
acceptLabel: "Apply",
rejectLabel: "Revise",
rejectRequiresReason: true,
rejectReasonLabel: "What needs to change?",
allowDeclineReason: true,
declineReasonPlaceholder: "Optional: tell the agent what you'd change.",
supersedeOnUserComment: true,
},
});
});
it("round-trips versioned tool action payload and lifecycle metadata", () => {
const payload = requestConfirmationPayloadSchema.parse({
version: 1,
prompt: "Approve send_email?",
toolAction: {
version: 1,
actionRequestId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
invocationId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
toolName: "send_email",
toolDisplayName: "Send email",
connectionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
applicationId: "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444",
appDisplayName: "Gmail",
risk: "write",
previewMarkdown: "Send an email to the reviewed recipient.",
argumentsSummaryJson: '{"to":"recipient@example.com"}',
argumentsHash: "reviewed-arguments-hash",
expiresAt: "2026-07-12T16:00:00.000Z",
},
});
const result = requestConfirmationResultSchema.parse({
version: 1,
outcome: "accepted",
toolAction: {
version: 1,
status: "executed",
errorCode: null,
errorMessage: null,
updatedAt: "2026-07-12T15:05:00.000Z",
},
});
expect(payload.toolAction).toMatchObject({
version: 1,
toolDisplayName: "Send email",
risk: "write",
argumentsHash: "reviewed-arguments-hash",
});
expect(result.toolAction).toMatchObject({ version: 1, status: "executed" });
expect(requestConfirmationPayloadSchema.parse({ version: 1, prompt: "Legacy confirmation?" }).toolAction)
.toBeUndefined();
});
it("parses superseded confirmation results with a replacement pointer", () => {
const result = requestConfirmationResultSchema.parse({
version: 1,
outcome: "superseded_by_newer_request",
supersededByInteractionId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
});
expect(result).toEqual({
version: 1,
outcome: "superseded_by_newer_request",
supersededByInteractionId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
});
});
it("accepts issue document targets for request_confirmation interactions", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_confirmation",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Accept the latest plan revision?",
allowDeclineReason: false,
target: {
type: "issue_document",
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
documentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
key: "plan",
revisionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
revisionNumber: 2,
label: "Plan v2",
href: "/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
},
},
});
expect(parsed.kind).toBe("request_confirmation");
if (parsed.kind !== "request_confirmation") return;
expect(parsed.payload.target).toMatchObject({
type: "issue_document",
key: "plan",
revisionNumber: 2,
label: "Plan v2",
href: "/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
});
});
it("accepts custom targets for request_confirmation interactions", () => {
for (const href of [
"https://example.com/checklist",
"http://example.com/checklist",
"/PAP/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
"#document-plan",
]) {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Proceed with the external checklist?",
target: {
type: "custom",
key: "external-checklist",
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
revisionNumber: 1,
label: "Checklist v1",
href,
},
},
});
expect(parsed.kind).toBe("request_confirmation");
if (parsed.kind !== "request_confirmation") return;
expect(parsed.payload.target).toMatchObject({
type: "custom",
key: "external-checklist",
label: "Checklist v1",
href,
});
}
});
it("parses ask_user_questions supersede flags and expired results", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "ask_user_questions",
payload: {
version: 1,
title: "Choose scope",
supersedeOnUserComment: false,
questions: [
{
id: "scope",
prompt: "Which scope should I use?",
selectionMode: "single",
options: [{ id: "small", label: "Small" }],
},
],
},
});
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
kind: "ask_user_questions",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
payload: {
supersedeOnUserComment: false,
},
});
expect(askUserQuestionsResultSchema.parse({
version: 1,
answers: [],
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
commentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
summaryMarkdown: null,
})).toMatchObject({
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
commentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
});
});
it("rejects unsafe request_confirmation target hrefs", () => {
const base = {
kind: "request_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Proceed?",
target: {
type: "custom",
key: "external-checklist",
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
label: "Checklist v1",
},
},
} as const;
for (const href of [
"javascript:alert(1)",
"data:text/html,hi",
"//evil.example/path",
"file:///tmp/x",
"mailto:user@example.com",
"slack://channel?id=1",
"vscode://file/tmp/x",
"ftp://example.com/file",
]) {
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
target: {
...base.payload.target,
href,
},
},
})).toThrow("href must be a root-relative path, same-page fragment, or http(s) URL");
}
});
it("parses request_checkbox_confirmation payloads with checkbox defaults", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
options: [
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
{ id: "item-2", label: "Old screenshot", description: "Captured during QA." },
],
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-2"],
minSelected: 0,
maxSelected: 2,
acceptLabel: "Archive selected",
rejectRequiresReason: true,
target: {
type: "issue_document",
key: "plan",
revisionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
revisionNumber: 2,
},
},
});
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
payload: {
allowDeclineReason: true,
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-2"],
minSelected: 0,
maxSelected: 2,
},
});
});
it("rejects invalid request_checkbox_confirmation option references and bounds", () => {
const base = {
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
options: [
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
{ id: "item-2", label: "Old screenshot" },
],
},
} as const;
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
options: [
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
{ id: "item-1", label: "Duplicate" },
],
},
})).toThrow("Option ids must be unique within one checkbox confirmation");
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["missing"],
},
})).toThrow("defaultSelectedOptionIds must reference existing option ids");
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-1"],
minSelected: 2,
},
})).toThrow("defaultSelectedOptionIds must satisfy minSelected");
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
minSelected: 2,
maxSelected: 1,
},
})).toThrow("maxSelected must be greater than or equal to minSelected");
});
it("rejects unsafe request_checkbox_confirmation target hrefs", () => {
const base = {
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
options: [{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" }],
target: {
type: "custom",
key: "external-checklist",
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
label: "Checklist v1",
},
},
} as const;
for (const href of ["file:///tmp/x", "slack://channel?id=1", "vscode://file/tmp/x"]) {
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
target: {
...base.payload.target,
href,
},
},
})).toThrow("href must be a root-relative path, same-page fragment, or http(s) URL");
}
});
it("accepts empty checkbox selections and rejects duplicate selected option ids", () => {
expect(acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({ selectedOptionIds: [] })).toEqual({
selectedOptionIds: [],
});
expect(() => acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
selectedOptionIds: ["item-1", "item-1"],
})).toThrow("selectedOptionIds must be unique");
});
it("parses request_item_verdicts payloads with defaults", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
items: [
{ id: "api", label: "API route", description: "Server submit endpoint" },
{ id: "docs", label: "Docs", previewMarkdown: "Document the route." },
],
},
});
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
payload: {
verdicts: ["approve", "reject"],
requireReasonOn: ["reject"],
allowBulkApprove: true,
},
});
});
it("accepts request_item_verdicts defer when enabled explicitly", () => {
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
items: [{ id: "api", label: "API route" }],
verdicts: ["approve", "reject", "defer"],
requireReasonOn: ["reject", "defer"],
},
});
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
payload: {
verdicts: ["approve", "reject", "defer"],
requireReasonOn: ["reject", "defer"],
},
});
});
it("rejects invalid request_item_verdicts item and reason references", () => {
const base = {
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
payload: {
version: 1,
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
items: [
{ id: "api", label: "API route" },
{ id: "docs", label: "Docs" },
],
},
} as const;
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
items: [],
},
})).toThrow();
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
items: [
{ id: "api", label: "API route" },
{ id: "api", label: "Duplicate" },
],
},
})).toThrow("Item ids must be unique within one item verdict request");
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
items: Array.from({ length: 201 }, (_value, index) => ({
id: `item-${index}`,
label: `Item ${index}`,
})),
},
})).toThrow();
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
...base,
payload: {
...base.payload,
verdicts: ["approve", "reject"],
requireReasonOn: ["defer"],
},
})).toThrow("requireReasonOn must reference enabled verdicts");
});
it("rejects duplicate request_item_verdicts submit ids", () => {
expect(() => submitIssueThreadInteractionVerdictsSchema.parse({
verdicts: [
{ id: "api", verdict: "approve" },
{ id: "api", verdict: "reject", reason: "Needs revision" },
],
})).toThrow("verdict item ids must be unique");
});
});