Files
PaperClipAI/tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-domains/integrator-routine-invocation.ts
T
f4337bb5fb test(evals): land the chat catalog eval harness on master (#19614)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The chat-feature evals measure whether agents complete real chat
requests through the product
> - The chat catalog eval harness and its repairs live on the
`chat-eval/master-candidate` branch, not on master
> - Today's work made 139 of 242 chat evals pass in verified single-case
live runs. Each product fix landed on master as its own pull request
> - The eval-side changes (setups, graders, fault seams, evidence
capture) still exist only on the candidate
> - This pull request lands the harness on master. Master stays the
source of truth for product behavior
> - The benefit is one tree: evals run against master commits, and
product fixes reach the evals as soon as they merge

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19441, Refs #19599, Refs #20270, Refs #20334, Refs #20342, Refs
#20344, Refs #20354, Refs #20360, Refs #20373, Refs #20382, Refs #20409

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The chat catalog eval harness and the product it evaluates live on a
long-running branch outside master. Eval fixes do not reach master, so
master-based eval runs use old setups and graders.

**Subsystem affected**
`tests/runner-e2e` chat catalog harness, plus a small set of product
changes that exist only on the candidate.

**Proposed change**
Land the harness on master. Every product fix from this eval work
already merged to master as its own pull request. Conflicts keep
master's product behavior.

## What Changed

- Most of the diff (808 of 851 files) is under `tests/runner-e2e/`:
chat-catalog domains, scenarios, descriptors, the TestOps manifest,
private evidence tooling, and their tests.
- Graders now check saved state, setup literals and rendered or clicked
links. Many keyword and regex checks on free-form replies are removed.
Each changed grader has a bumped `oracleVersion` and calibration tests
(a valid reply, a reworded valid reply, and broken variants that must
fail).
- The shared link helper `hasLink` no longer treats a list link (for
example `/COM/issues?view=mine`) as a link to every task without a URL
key.
- Setup fixes build real state through supported product routes: routine
history, agent grants through the board grant route, budget holds with a
real cap, and a storage-layer archive fault for
`inbox-search.archive-partial-failure`.
- Browser boundary journeys (sign-in, chat-disabled, onboarding) now
write the standard pass evidence files.
- Retargeted cases, approved by the maintainer:
`agent-chat.chat-disabled` (Conference Room gate),
`agents.restore-instructions` (no saved instruction history),
`access.manage-membership` (member permission edits stay board-only).
- The private evidence trusted files (`manual-private-handoff.ts`,
`manual-private-retention.ts`, `manual-private-report-assets.ts`) are
byte-identical to master.
- Product files outside `tests/` (43 files, +1,328 −49) carry
candidate-only changes that master does not yet have. Most are tests.
The main code changes are in `request-human-input.ts`,
`heartbeat-run-summary.ts`, `native-completion-feedback.ts`,
`native-run-finalizer.ts`, `openapi.ts`, `secrets.ts` and
`IssueChatLongThreadPerf.tsx`.

## Verification

- `pnpm vitest run chat-catalog-domains chat-catalog-contract.test.ts
chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts unit-launcher.test.mjs
--testTimeout=180000` in `tests/runner-e2e`: 269 files pass, 3,550 tests
pass.
- `node --test chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs`: 10 pass.
- `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`:
no change.
- `tsc` for `server` and `tests/runner-e2e`: clean.
- Live single-case verification: 139 of 242 cases passed on paid runs,
and a person read the saved evidence for each. These are single-case
runs, not one full-cohort run.

## Risks

- Large diff. Most of it is test-only, but the 43 non-test files change
product code paths. Review those files first.
- Some graders are now less strict on reply wording. A person must read
replies for meaning on those cases.
- 42 cases need disposable outside accounts (Notion, Slack, GitHub,
Daytona and others) and stay blocked. `access.invite-teammate` stays
failing until local agent isolation lands, because the runner's durable
state keeps a live invite token.
- The paid workflow compares the trusted private-evidence files with
master. They are unchanged, so this risk is low.

## Model Used

Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code
execution, in Claude Code. Subagents used the same model.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-10 08:02:11 -06:00

138 lines
13 KiB
TypeScript

import { chatCatalogNativePhaseDeadline, chatCatalogNativePhaseIsTimely, chatCatalogNativePhaseRemainingBudget } from "../chat-catalog-contract.js";
import { createRoutineSchema } from "../../../packages/shared/src/validators/routine.js";
import type { RoutineDetail, RoutineRunSummary } from "../../../packages/shared/src/types/routine.js";
import type { ChatCatalogContext } from "../chat-catalog-contract.js";
import { pollUntil } from "../api.js";
import { collectRunEvents } from "../run-observations.js";
import { apiReadDigests, recordParams, type ApiRead } from "./api-read-receipts.js";
import { checks, hasLink, observation, project, type Entity, type InternalObservation } from "./internal-support.js";
import { integratorDefinition, observeInternal, inspectResult, resultHref } from "./integrator-support.js";
/**
* One completed product tool execution, as recorded in the run's durable event stream. A call_api
* result's body is redacted before saving, so it is kept as its input digest, operation and status.
*/
export interface InvocationToolRead { runId: string; name: string; at: string; output: string; apiRead?: { inputSha256: string; operationId: string; ok: boolean; status: number } }
interface InvocationObservation extends InternalObservation { routine: RoutineDetail; invocations: RoutineRunSummary[]; outputComments: Entity[]; toolReads?: InvocationToolRead[] }
async function invocationToolReads(ctx: ChatCatalogContext, runs: InternalObservation["runs"]): Promise<InvocationToolRead[]> {
const reads: InvocationToolRead[] = [];
for (const run of runs) {
const events = await collectRunEvents<{ seq?: number; createdAt?: string; payload?: Record<string, unknown> | null }>((afterSeq, limit) =>
ctx.input.api.getRunObservation(`/api/heartbeat-runs/${run.id}/events?afterSeq=${afterSeq}&limit=${limit}`));
const uses = new Map<string, { inputSha256: string; operationId: string }>();
for (const event of events) {
const prp = event.payload?.prpEvent as { eventType?: string; payload?: { name?: unknown; status?: unknown; output?: unknown; item?: Record<string, any> } } | undefined;
const item = prp?.payload?.item;
if (item?.type === "tool_use" && item.name === "call_api" && item.input?.apiPayloadRedacted === true && typeof item.input.operationId === "string")
uses.set(String(item.id), { inputSha256: String(item.input.apiPayloadSha256), operationId: item.input.operationId });
const use = item?.type === "tool_result" ? uses.get(String(item.tool_use_id)) : undefined;
if (use && item?.result?.apiOperationId === use.operationId && typeof item.result.status === "number")
reads.push({ runId: run.id, name: "call_api", at: event.createdAt ?? "", output: "", apiRead: { ...use, ok: item.result.ok === true, status: item.result.status } });
if (prp?.eventType !== "tool.execution.completed" || prp.payload?.status !== "completed" || typeof prp.payload.name !== "string") continue;
const output = typeof prp.payload.output === "string" ? prp.payload.output : JSON.stringify(prp.payload.output ?? "");
reads.push({ runId: run.id, name: prp.payload.name, at: event.createdAt ?? "", output: output.slice(0, 8192) });
}
}
return reads;
}
async function observeInvocation(ctx: ChatCatalogContext, state: Record<string, unknown>, withToolReads = false): Promise<InvocationObservation> {
const base = await observeInternal(ctx, state); const id = (state.routine as RoutineDetail).id;
const invocations = await ctx.input.api.get<RoutineRunSummary[]>(`/api/routines/${id}/runs`);
return { ...base, routine: await ctx.input.api.get<RoutineDetail>(`/api/routines/${id}`), invocations,
outputComments: invocations[0]?.linkedIssueId ? await ctx.input.api.get<Entity[]>(`/api/issues/${invocations[0].linkedIssueId}/comments?order=asc`) : [],
...(withToolReads ? { toolReads: await invocationToolReads(ctx, base.runs) } : {}) };
}
function invocationObservation(value: unknown): InvocationObservation | undefined {
const o = value as InvocationObservation;
return observation(value) && !!o.routine && Array.isArray(o.invocations) && Array.isArray(o.outputComments) ? o : undefined;
}
/** Narrow contradiction guard for the first answer only: a sentence that states the summary,
* run or task as already done, without negation or a future/conditional frame. It never makes
* a valid answer depend on particular wording; it only refuses an explicit premature claim. */
function prematureCompletionClaim(reply: string) {
return reply.split(/(?<=[.!?])\s+|\n+/).some(sentence =>
/\b(?:summary|execution|task|run)\b[^.!?\n]{0,50}\b(?:completed|finished|succeeded|is ready|is done)\b/i.test(sentence)
&& !/\bnot\b|n't\b|\b(?:pending|waiting|will|once|when|after|until|should|expected|queued|started|in progress)\b/i.test(sentence));
}
/** The run read a product record naming `id` at or after `since`: an unredacted tool output exposing the
* record, or a successful call_api read whose saved input digest names it (the body itself is redacted). */
function readRecordAfter(o: InvocationObservation, runId: string | undefined, id: string | undefined, since: string | null | undefined, reads: readonly ApiRead[]) {
const digests = apiReadDigests(reads);
return !!runId && !!id && (o.toolReads ?? []).some(row => row.runId === runId
&& (row.output.includes(id) || !!row.apiRead && row.apiRead.ok && row.apiRead.status >= 200 && row.apiRead.status < 300 && digests.has(row.apiRead.inputSha256))
&& (!since || Date.parse(row.at) >= Date.parse(since)));
}
export function gradeIntegratorRoutineInvocation(value: unknown) {
const c = checks(); const o = invocationObservation(value);
c.add("actual-invocation-and-output", !!o && Array.isArray(o.toolReads), "Requires public invocation, task, native output, tool-read and original response evidence.");
if (!o) return c.result();
const invocation = o.invocations[0]; const task = o.tasks.find(row => row.id === invocation?.linkedIssueId);
const first = invocationObservation(o.state.firstInvocation);
const firstInvocation = first?.invocations[0];
const projectId = (o.state.project as Entity | undefined)?.id;
c.add("one-manual-launch-input", o.invocations.length === 1 && invocation?.source === "manual" && invocation.routineId === o.routine.id
&& invocation.triggerPayload?.variables != null && (invocation.triggerPayload.variables as Record<string, unknown>).projectName === "Launch"
&& !!task && task.projectId === projectId && task.assigneeAgentId === o.leadId,
"Exactly one manual invocation retains the supplied project-name input and creates the intended owned Launch task.");
c.add("same-delivery-is-not-new-intent", !!firstInvocation?.idempotencyKey && o.state.replayRunId === invocation?.id
&& o.state.replayIssueId === task?.id && firstInvocation.id === invocation?.id && o.invocations.length === 1,
"Replaying the committed public invocation with its original key retains the same invocation and task IDs.");
c.add("accepted-versus-completed-at-first-reply", !!first && first.invocations.length === 1 && first.reply.trim().length > 0
&& (!prematureCompletionClaim(first.reply) || firstInvocation?.status === "completed" && first.tasks.some(row => row.id === firstInvocation.linkedIssueId && row.status === "done")),
"The first answer cannot claim a completed summary before the saved invocation and task actually complete.");
const outputRun = o.runs.find(run => run.contextSnapshot?.issueId === task?.id && run.agentId === o.leadId && run.status === "succeeded" && run.runtimeMode === "native");
const output = o.outputComments.filter(row => row.authorAgentId === o.leadId && row.createdByRunId === outputRun?.id && (row.body ?? "").trim().length > 0);
c.add("actual-completed-summary", !!task && invocation?.status === "completed" && task.status === "done" && !!outputRun && output.length > 0
&& readRecordAfter(o, outputRun?.id, projectId, undefined, [{ operationId: "GET /api/projects/{id}", pathParams: recordParams("id", projectId) }]),
"The routine's own native task run read the actual Launch project, saved its summary on the task and completed normally.");
// The follow-up answer comes from a chat run that did not exist at the first reply and is not the routine's own task run.
const followUp = o.runs.find(run => run.agentId === o.leadId && run.status === "succeeded" && run.contextSnapshot?.issueId !== task?.id
&& !!first && !first.runs.some(row => row.id === run.id));
const later = first && o.reply.startsWith(first.reply) ? o.reply.slice(first.reply.length).trim() : "";
c.add("later-actual-result-and-task-link", !!task && hasLink(o, "issues", task) && later.length > 0 && !!followUp
&& readRecordAfter(o, followUp?.id, task.id, invocation?.completedAt ? new Date(invocation.completedAt).toISOString() : undefined,
["GET /api/issues/{id}", "GET /api/issues/{id}/comments"].map(operationId => ({ operationId, pathParams: recordParams("id", task.id, task.identifier), paged: true, queries: [{ order: "asc" }, { order: "desc" }] }))),
"The explicit later request is answered by a new chat run that read the completed result task after the invocation finished, and the conversation links that task.");
return c.result();
}
/** Validate prerequisite input against the same supported public creation schema. */
export function launchSummaryRoutineInput(projectId: string, assigneeAgentId: string) {
return createRoutineSchema.parse({ title: "Launch summary", projectId, assigneeAgentId,
description: "Summarize the actual {{projectName}} project in one saved task comment, including its actual payment approval state. Link the project and mark this summary task done. Do not change project records or create follow-up tasks.",
variables: [{ name: "projectName", type: "text", required: true }] });
}
export const integratorRoutineInvocationCases = [integratorDefinition("routines", "routines.run-now", async ctx => {
const p = await project(ctx, "Launch", { description: "Synthetic Launch project. Payment approval is pending; no approval has been received." });
const routine = await ctx.input.api.post<RoutineDetail>(`/api/companies/${ctx.input.fixtures.company.id}/routines`, launchSummaryRoutineInput(p.id, ctx.input.fixtures.agent.id));
return { project: p, routine };
}, (ctx, state) => observeInvocation(ctx, state, true), gradeIntegratorRoutineInvocation, async (ctx, _state, value) => {
const o = invocationObservation(value); const task = o?.tasks.find(row => row.id === o.invocations[0]?.linkedIssueId);
if (!o || !task) throw new Error("Missing actual routine result task");
await inspectResult(ctx, `/${ctx.input.fixtures.company.issuePrefix}/issues/${task.identifier ?? task.id}`, task.title!, resultHref(o, task.identifier ?? task.id, "issues") ?? resultHref(o, task.id, "issues"));
}, {
oracleVersion: "paperclip.chat-catalog.integrator.routine-invocation.v3",
sourceFiles: ["chat-catalog-domains/integrator-routine-invocation.ts", "chat-catalog-domains/api-read-receipts.ts", "run-observations.ts", "chat-catalog-domains/integrator-support.ts", "chat-catalog-domains/internal-support.ts", "chat-scenarios/routines.yaml"],
expectedRunCount: 3, expectedHumanMessageCount: 2, attemptTimeoutMs: 720_000,
async act(ctx, state) {
const first = await pollUntil({ label: "routine invocation first actual reply", deadlineAt: chatCatalogNativePhaseDeadline(ctx, Date.now() + 180_000), intervalMs: 1000,
load: () => observeInvocation(ctx, state), accept: o => chatCatalogNativePhaseIsTimely(ctx) && (o.invocations.length === 1 && o.runs.some(row => row.agentId === o.leadId && row.contextSnapshot?.issueId === ctx.issue()?.id && row.status === "succeeded") && ctx.issue()?.conversationState === "waiting"),
reject: o => o.invocations.length > 1 ? "Initial request created duplicate routine invocations" : undefined });
state.firstInvocation = { ...first, state: structuredClone(state) };
const invocation = first.invocations[0]!;
if (!invocation.idempotencyKey || !invocation.linkedIssueId) throw new Error("Committed routine invocation has no replayable public identity");
// Independent transport-delivery probe of the existing committed request;
// it must not supply another user intent or admit another execution.
const replay = await ctx.input.api.post<RoutineRunSummary>(`/api/routines/${invocation.routineId}/run`, {
source: invocation.source, triggerId: invocation.triggerId, idempotencyKey: invocation.idempotencyKey,
payload: invocation.triggerPayload, variables: invocation.triggerPayload?.variables,
});
state.replayRunId = replay.id; state.replayIssueId = replay.linkedIssueId;
await ctx.input.evidence("chat-routine-invocation-first-response.json", state.firstInvocation);
await pollUntil({ label: "real routine execution completed", deadlineAt: Date.now() + 240_000, intervalMs: 1000,
load: () => observeInvocation(ctx, state), accept: o => o.invocations.length === 1 && o.invocations[0]?.status === "completed" && o.runs.length === 2 && o.runs.every(run => run.status === "succeeded"),
reject: o => o.invocations.length > 1 || o.runs.length > 2 ? "Delivery replay admitted unexpected additional work" : undefined });
const { sendChatMessage } = await import("../chat-flow.js");
await sendChatMessage(ctx.input.page, "What was the actual result of that summary run?", chatCatalogNativePhaseRemainingBudget(ctx));
},
})];