Files
PaperClipAI/maps
DottaandPaperclip 87bf89756e fix: support Daytona runner upgrades and ignore obsolete Claude options (#17361)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Existing Claude and Codex agents can upgrade to Paperclip Runner.
> - A Daytona computer needs platform qualification before Runner
becomes its default.
> - The upgrade notice required that default, so it hid the action that
could start qualification.
> - Saved Claude turn limits also caused conversion to fail even though
Runner can run without them.
> - This pull request verifies the computer on click and ignores
obsolete Claude options with a warning.
> - Agents retain their model, account, environment, instructions, and
permission policy.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Related: #17122.

**What happened?**

A legacy Claude agent on a Daytona snapshot had no upgrade button until
its environment had platform qualification. A saved `maxTurnsPerRun:
1000` then caused conversion to return HTTP 422.

**Expected behavior**

The upgrade action verifies a supported Daytona computer and converts
the agent. Unsupported tuning options produce a visible warning and do
not block execution.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Create a legacy Claude agent with `maxTurnsPerRun: 1000` on an active
Daytona snapshot.
2. Open Runtime before the environment has platform qualification.
3. Try to upgrade to Paperclip Runner.

**Paperclip version or commit**

After #17122, reproduced against `9c442cf48e`.

## What Changed

- Offer upgrade on probe-capable Daytona snapshots and immutable sandbox
images. Perform the public environment probe only after a click. Save
after fresh adapter discovery confirms support.
- Resolve the actual computer for explicit, instance-default, and hidden
managed environments. Preserve pending edits and reject stale probe
results.
- Ignore Claude `maxTurnsPerRun`, `chrome`, `warmHandleIdleMs`, and
`acpWarmHandleIdleMs`. Return structured warnings from create, hire, and
update. Show warnings in Runtime and after a save.
- Keep validation for commands, credentials, filesystem, network, and
permission settings.
- Retain the legacy turn limit in the existing live conversion fixture.
Update regression tests, upgrade stories, and capability maps.

## Verification

- Red: the old route returns HTTP 422 for the saved turn limit; the old
form hides the Daytona upgrade notice.
- Green: 417 focused server and form tests pass. A further 188 tests
pass after the review fixes. Qualification coverage includes failed
probes, unsupported targets, changed settings, managed defaults, unsaved
environment variables, and forced Kubernetes targets.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. Token gates, map checks,
map tests, and Storybook catalog checks pass.
- Real local Claude Opus 5.5 conversion and task pass, with the
downloaded artifact checked against seeded source bytes, SHA-256, and
Git commit.
- Real browser upgrade and full Claude Opus 5.5 task on a disposable
named Daytona snapshot pass at `b81cec7d8c`. The saved agent retains its
model, high effort, credentials, timeout, and grace settings while
dropping the turn limit with a visible warning. Exactly one successful
run completed the task. The downloaded artifact matched independently
seeded source bytes, SHA-256, and Git commit; the source was unchanged,
no interactions remained pending, and the delivery link survived a
browser reload. The snapshot used current runtime assets built from
public source. The supplied Daytona account could not access the
original staging snapshot, so this verifies an equivalent local fixture
rather than that exact snapshot. Disposable test resources were cleaned
up.
- Earlier live attempts remain recorded: an image-based sandbox creation
failed, and the first named-snapshot probe returned failure with
unresolved provisional cleanup identity. Later named-snapshot probing
and the task succeeded; the initial creation failures are not attributed
to this PR or declared resolved. A separate attempt using the Oct 18
cached runtime failed the current provider-pack compatibility check;
rebuilding the runtime from matching public source removed that
mismatch. Owned resources were identified and cleaned up, with
diagnostic databases retained.
- 54 checks passed at `b81cec7d8c`, with no failed checks; Greptile and
Paperclip Review both scored 5/5, with both review threads resolved.
Master advanced during the live proof, so the branch was rebased with
both sides of additive import/test conflicts retained. On the rebased
head `2b74222b94`, 472 focused tests, UI typecheck, and UI build pass.
All required CI gates pass; Greptile and Paperclip Review both score 5/5
on this head, with no unresolved review threads. The PR is mergeable.
The serial local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after the CI test lanes
passed; that local run is not claimed as a pass.

## Risks

- An explicit upgrade can allocate a temporary probe sandbox and take
several minutes. Probe failures leave the agent on its existing runner.
- Ignored options no longer enforce a turn cap, Chrome integration, or
legacy idle-time tuning. The UI warns about each active ignored option.
- Unsafe or ambiguous execution settings still fail validation. This
change does not weaken environment qualification or runtime artifact
checks.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, code execution, and browser tools.
The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in
this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-24 07:59:18 -07:00
..

Paperclip maps

The maps describe the same capabilities from two perspectives:

  • Feature map: what a person can do, where to reach it, and how to verify the user journey. Preserve its Poteto format.
  • Agent access map: the APIs and agent entry points for those capabilities, their permission boundaries, and access verification.

These are sibling directories under maps/. Each feature file has a same-named agent access companion. Reuse the product map's sub-feature IDs, so tasks/create identifies the same capability in both maps. Product behavior remains governed by the implementation spec; a map cannot grant authority or redefine a permission denial as success.

Capability identifiers

The feature ID is the recipe filename without .md, such as onboarding. The full capability ID joins that feature ID and a Sub-features key with /: the company key in feature-map/onboarding.md is onboarding/company. Its agent-access-map/onboarding.md companion uses the same local company key. The feature-map index lists the existing feature and full capability IDs.

Each child page states Feature ID: `onboarding`. after its introduction or product-map link. In feature recipes, show the full ID beside the parsed local key: - `company`: `onboarding/company` — create a company. In access companions and Storybook verification guidance, keep the existing local heading and put Capability ID: `onboarding/company`. beneath it. These labels make the existing identifiers visible without changing keys, anchors, or ID generation.

Use full capability IDs in cross-feature references, Storybook annotations, tests, issues, PRs, and verification evidence. Both segments use lowercase letters, digits, and hyphens. Keep filenames and keys stable when display titles or navigation labels change; renaming either changes the capability ID.

Entry-point IDs describe a surface, such as web-wizard, and are scoped to their recipe. Reference them with a recipe link, such as onboarding.md#web-wizard, and record the capability exercised separately. Navigation section labels are not capability IDs. See IDs and references for examples.

Access contract

Every business operation needs both an API and a usable agent entry point for an actor authorized to perform it. A dedicated tool is optional when REST, the CLI, an assigned MCP client, or native search_api / call_api already provides the operation. Record which agent surfaces actually have that path; an installed CLI or optional MCP package cannot be assumed available to every native/remote run.

Track these independently:

Dimension Values and meaning
API present, missing, not-applicable, or unreviewed. Use exact methods/paths; distinguish protocols from REST.
Agent access available, partial, missing, restricted, operator-only, not-applicable, or unreviewed. Name the supported surface and actual entry point.
Policy Actor, action/grant, company/resource/ownership scope, responsible-user intersection, run requirements, work modes, and gates relevant to the operation.
Evidence source-only, verified, failed, blocked, or not-run. Source presence and successful board calls are not agent verification.
Review depth baseline records representative operations and known gaps; operation-reviewed enumerates the capability's meaningful operations and their individual access contracts.

Broad capabilities such as task properties must be split into operations before they count as operation-reviewed: renaming, metadata edits, assignment, dependencies, and lifecycle changes can use different tools and permission rules. An available read path cannot certify a write path. List/get/create/update/delete, execution/control, credential handling, and resolution are separate where their authority or transport differs. Do not duplicate request schemas from OpenAPI.

Exceptions and restrictions

Presentation-only state, static developer fixtures, and pre-start/local operator work may use not-applicable for a domain API, with a concrete reason and the existing local path. When a capability combines shared data with presentation, split the operations: browser recents do not exempt resource lookup from API coverage. Promoting local state to a shared feature requires revisiting the entry.

A board-only endpoint is restricted for agent identity, not an automatic exception or a missing API. Cite the enforced policy and record whether the agent can request the authorized human's action and observe its result. An unresolved delegation question remains in Gaps. Company access, a job title, a personal assistant's OAuth grant, or an accepted interaction does not grant board identity. Keep budget, approval, secret and execution authority intact.

Check actual route/service authorization and production tool admission. OpenAPI actor labels and scenario/evaluation tool declarations are supporting metadata; record disagreements rather than using them as proof of access. Native API fallback restrictions, tool field/scope limits, and rollout settings are part of the agent path, even when a legacy agent can call the REST endpoint directly.

Companion file format

Each agent-access-map/<area>.md has an H1, a relative link to its product file, and its feature ID, followed by one H2 backticked local key per product sub-feature. Each capability starts with its full capability ID and contains these fields:

  • Review: baseline or operation-reviewed.
  • API: presence state and exact operation IDs, or a reasoned exception.
  • Agent access: availability state and concrete entry points by surface.
  • Policy: relevant permission and runtime boundaries, with source references.
  • Evidence: evidence state, reviewed commit and sources or executed proof.
  • Verification: allowed/denied assertions and observable result; record what has actually run separately from the proposed recipe.
  • Gaps: missing APIs/paths, discovery drift, unreviewed operations or policy decisions; use none only for the enumerated scope that was reviewed.

For an operation-reviewed capability, use H3 backticked operation IDs and repeat API, Agent access, Policy, Evidence, Verification and Gaps for each operation. Use small operation names such as create, update, read, or run-now. The enclosing capability has Review: operation-reviewed only after its meaningful operations have been enumerated. The following excerpt shows one operation; include the others before using that review label:

## `definition`

Review: `operation-reviewed`.

### `create`

API: `present` — POST /api/companies/{companyId}/routines.
Agent access: `available` — agent REST, CLI routine create and native call_api
under the enabled rollout and active-run/mode gates.
Policy: same company; assigneeAgentId must be the calling agent; cite the
routine authorization and native API policy sources.
Evidence: `source-only` — reviewed commit and source links; no live proof.
Verification: `not-run` — create an owned routine; reject assignment to another
agent; inspect saved configuration, attribution and retry behavior.
Gaps: verify ownership and responsible-user resolution with a permitted agent
context; source presence alone does not qualify this operation.

Keeping the maps synchronized

When a change adds/removes a capability or changes its behavior, API, permission, tool binding, CLI support, or work mode, update the affected companion and product recipe as appropriate in the same change. Preserve IDs across renames where the capability is unchanged; update the affected cross-links together. Indexes discover recipes automatically. An API-only change may update the companion without rewriting unchanged user instructions.

maintain-verification-skill owns reconciliation of both maps. It follows changed source and authorization, checks real agent reachability, and records product gaps without implementing them during a maintenance pass. The creation skill uses this structure. verify-paperclip consumes the relevant recipes and reports evidence/drift; map editing belongs to maintenance.

Run the structural check after map changes:

node scripts/check-maps.mjs

It checks paired areas/IDs, navigation metadata, required fields, and local references. It does not certify endpoint authorization, production bindings, operation completeness, or live behavior. Source audits must check those against the existing API and tool contracts; avoid a second schema catalog or runtime.

For live access proof, use Paperclip's existing API/runner/MCP fixtures or an owned isolated instance. Use the actual agent identity, target and work mode. Assert the allowed result and relevant denial (another company/private resource, wrong owner, missing grant, invalid run, restricted mode or resolver). Mutations also need persisted state/attribution and retry behavior. Capture evidence using the existing artifact workflow; keep executed run results separate from generated maps/generated/coverage.json, which lists page references.

Local authorship and generated indexes

Change only the recipes, access contracts and stories whose behavior or intent changed. Feature recipes own navigation metadata; stories own small parameters.paperclip annotations. Keep the feature-map README's readable ID index aligned with those sources; it does not register entries for generation. Do not refresh counts in shared READMEs, inventories, fingerprints or review journals.

node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs validates and generates aggregate navigation, Storybook data, verification routes and the page inventory. All outputs live in ignored maps/generated/, ui/storybook/generated/, and the ignored Storybook preview.tsx wrapper. Start/build and UI typechecking generate their own inputs. A clean merged checkout therefore assembles both branches' changes automatically.

Git provides history and diffs. PRs, issues and CI artifacts retain review/run evidence for the named revision. Capability associations do not create whole-file review dependencies. Keep durable scenario limits in the affected recipe or story.