mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-18 05:23:39 +02:00
DottaandPaperclip
fcb2e99e8f
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A useful app store needs accurate and selectable provider definitions. > - Local brand assets now cover the expanded provider set. > - Provider methods differ in transport, authentication, ownership, and required scope. > - This pull request expands the catalog and encodes those provider contracts. > - The benefit is a larger self-serve store with explicit setup choices. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11965 This is stack 6 of 11. It depends on stack 5 and replaces another reviewable part of #11965. ## What Changed - Add and update provider definitions for the self-serve catalog. - Add Google Workspace connection methods and capability profiles. - Add catalog generation, ingestion, URL matching, and contract tests. - Update legacy key tests to use a provider that still uses header credentials. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts` - Result: 164 tests passed. - `pnpm build` ## Risks - An incorrect provider definition can offer the wrong setup method. - Contract tests verify transport, authentication, and provider URL behavior. - The change does not add a database migration. > I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This stack continues the existing app connection work from #11965 and does not duplicate another planned item. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime model ID and context window were not exposed. The model used reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Refs #` or (b) described the issue in this pull request - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
43 lines
1.1 KiB
JSON
43 lines
1.1 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"schemaVersion": 1,
|
|
"slug": "sentry",
|
|
"name": "Sentry",
|
|
"description": "Investigate errors, releases, and production issues.",
|
|
"categories": [
|
|
"developer"
|
|
],
|
|
"featured": false,
|
|
"branding": {
|
|
"logoUrl": "/brands/apps/sentry.svg",
|
|
"darkLogoUrl": "/brands/apps/sentry-dark.svg"
|
|
},
|
|
"urlPatterns": [
|
|
"https://mcp.sentry.dev/*"
|
|
],
|
|
"methods": [
|
|
{
|
|
"key": "mcp-oauth",
|
|
"transport": "mcp_remote",
|
|
"auth": "oauth",
|
|
"ownershipModes": [
|
|
"customer",
|
|
"dcr"
|
|
],
|
|
"whenToUse": "Use the provider-hosted connection for the quickest setup.",
|
|
"defaults": {
|
|
"serverUrl": "https://mcp.sentry.dev/mcp",
|
|
"discoveryUrl": "https://sentry.io/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server"
|
|
},
|
|
"guidanceMd": "Connect the Sentry organization and projects agents need for incident work.",
|
|
"riskTier": "S2",
|
|
"requiredResourceFilters": [
|
|
"organization",
|
|
"project",
|
|
"environment"
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"docsUrl": "https://mcp.sentry.dev/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server",
|
|
"redirectConstraints": "https-or-loopback-http"
|
|
}
|