mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-21 16:27:18 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Issue interactions give agents and people a structured decision record. > - Resolver routes used different authorization rules. > - Some routes blocked valid agents, including task watchdogs with normal issue access. > - The API did not show who could resolve a pending interaction. > - This pull request gives every interaction kind one resolver policy evaluator. > - The benefit is a clear decision path with consistent governance and company isolation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes: #8087 Refs: #7403 Related PR: #11082 proposes board-only confirmation rules. This change keeps human-only review as an explicit policy. **What happened?** Agents could create issue interactions. Some resolver routes still required board access. This left valid agent confirmations pending. Task watchdogs could see the same problem without board identity. **Expected behavior** Every interaction kind must use one resolver policy contract. The contract must support `anyone`, `not_creator`, and `human_only`. It must also apply all normal governance controls. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a `request_confirmation` interaction as an agent. 2. Resolve it with another authorized agent. 3. Observe the board-only denial. **Paperclip version or commit** The problem exists on `master` before this change. **Deployment mode** Local development with `pnpm dev`. ## What Changed - Add canonical policies for `anyone`, `not_creator`, and `human_only`. - Use one server evaluator for every interaction kind. - Apply named addressees, company limits, review rules, and task watchdog scope. - Charge cross-issue resolutions to the existing per-run action limit. - Return the effective resolver audience in attention and interaction data. - Show the audience, governance choices, and denial reasons in the board UI. - Add telemetry, API documents, product documents, and regression fixtures. - Add migration provenance for safe legacy behavior. - Make migration `0218` safe for complete replays and partial prior runs. ## Product Rules - An interaction records a response. It does not grant authority for the next action. - `anyone` lets any authorized issue participant respond. - `not_creator` requires a responder other than the interaction creator. - `human_only` requires an authorized person. - A named addressee, company policy, or governed action can narrow the audience. - These controls cannot widen the audience. - A task watchdog uses the same rules as an ordinary agent. - A task watchdog does not receive board authority. - An agent resolution on another issue uses the shared cross-issue action limit. - Legacy pending interactions keep their earlier restrictions. - The UI shows the effective audience and a permanent denial reason. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db check:migrations` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/db/src/issue-thread-interaction-resolver-policy-migration.test.ts` - The focused PostgreSQL test applies migration `0218` twice. - The test also completes a partial prior run and preserves existing provenance. - The latest GitHub head has 29 successful checks. - The opt-in Storybook visual check skipped as expected. - Greptile reports 5/5 with no open comments. ## Risks - New interaction writes use `anyone` by default. - Callers must select `not_creator` or `human_only` when they need stricter review. - Legacy pending interactions keep the old creator and human restrictions. - Migration `0218` fills only missing provenance fields during recovery. - Cross-issue resolutions can reach the existing action limit. - The shared evaluator affects every interaction kind. - Route, service, database, shared contract, and UI tests cover these rules. > This work matches the Agent Reviews and Approvals direction in `ROADMAP.md`. It does not duplicate a planned item. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime does not expose the exact deployment ID or context window. The agent used reasoning, repository tools, shell commands, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked public issues or described the issue with the required labels - [x] I have not referenced internal Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open comments - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
597 lines
18 KiB
TypeScript
597 lines
18 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary,
|
|
buildSuggestedTaskTree,
|
|
collectSuggestedTaskClientKeys,
|
|
countSuggestedTaskNodes,
|
|
getCheckboxConfirmationSelectedLabels,
|
|
getItemVerdictProgress,
|
|
getRequestConfirmationTargetHref,
|
|
getQuestionAnswerLabels,
|
|
isDegenerateAskUserQuestions,
|
|
isSupersededByNewerSiblingInteraction,
|
|
shouldHideInteractionCard,
|
|
normalizeRequestConfirmationTargetHref,
|
|
} from "./issue-thread-interactions";
|
|
import type {
|
|
AskUserQuestionsInteraction,
|
|
AskUserQuestionsQuestion,
|
|
IssueThreadInteraction,
|
|
RequestItemVerdictsInteraction,
|
|
} from "./issue-thread-interactions";
|
|
|
|
// The open default every interaction now inherits when its creator omits
|
|
// `resolverPolicy` (PAP-17277 contract).
|
|
const resolverPolicyFields = {
|
|
resolverPolicy: "anyone",
|
|
requestedResolverPolicy: "anyone",
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicy: "anyone",
|
|
resolverPolicyProvenance: "inherited",
|
|
effectiveResolverPolicySource: "requested",
|
|
legacyResolverPolicyAliases: { requested: "board_or_agents", effective: "board_or_agents" },
|
|
} as const;
|
|
|
|
describe("buildSuggestedTaskTree", () => {
|
|
it("preserves parent-child relationships from client keys", () => {
|
|
const roots = buildSuggestedTaskTree([
|
|
{
|
|
clientKey: "root",
|
|
title: "Root",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
clientKey: "child",
|
|
parentClientKey: "root",
|
|
title: "Child",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
clientKey: "grandchild",
|
|
parentClientKey: "child",
|
|
title: "Grandchild",
|
|
},
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
expect(roots).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(roots[0]?.task.clientKey).toBe("root");
|
|
expect(roots[0]?.children[0]?.task.clientKey).toBe("child");
|
|
expect(countSuggestedTaskNodes(roots[0]!)).toBe(3);
|
|
expect(collectSuggestedTaskClientKeys(roots[0]!)).toEqual(["root", "child", "grandchild"]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("issue thread interaction helpers", () => {
|
|
it("summarizes task and question interactions", () => {
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary({
|
|
id: "interaction-1",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
...resolverPolicyFields,
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
tasks: [
|
|
{ clientKey: "task-1", title: "One" },
|
|
{ clientKey: "task-2", title: "Two" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toBe("Suggested 2 tasks");
|
|
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary({
|
|
id: "interaction-accepted",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
kind: "suggest_tasks",
|
|
status: "accepted",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
...resolverPolicyFields,
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
tasks: [
|
|
{ clientKey: "task-1", title: "One" },
|
|
{ clientKey: "task-2", title: "Two" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
createdTasks: [{ clientKey: "task-1", issueId: "child-1" }],
|
|
skippedClientKeys: ["task-2"],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toBe("Accepted 1 of 2 tasks");
|
|
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary({
|
|
id: "interaction-2",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
...resolverPolicyFields,
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
questions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "question-1",
|
|
prompt: "Pick one",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
options: [{ id: "option-1", label: "Option 1" }],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toBe("Asked 1 question");
|
|
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary({
|
|
id: "interaction-answered",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
status: "answered",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
...resolverPolicyFields,
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
questions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "question-1",
|
|
prompt: "Pick one",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
options: [{ id: "option-1", label: "Option 1" }],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [{ questionId: "question-1", optionIds: ["option-1"] }],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toBe("Answered 1 question");
|
|
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary({
|
|
id: "interaction-expired",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
...resolverPolicyFields,
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-06T12:05:00.000Z",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
questions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "question-1",
|
|
prompt: "Pick one",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
options: [{ id: "option-1", label: "Option 1" }],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
|
|
commentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
},
|
|
})).toBe("Question expired after comment");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("summarizes checkbox confirmation interactions by count", () => {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
id: "interaction-checkbox",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation" as const,
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee" as const,
|
|
...resolverPolicyFields,
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1 as const,
|
|
prompt: "Pick items",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "a", label: "A" },
|
|
{ id: "b", label: "B" },
|
|
{ id: "c", label: "C" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary({ ...base, status: "pending" }))
|
|
.toBe("Requested a selection from 3 options");
|
|
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary({
|
|
...base,
|
|
status: "accepted",
|
|
result: { version: 1, outcome: "accepted", selectedOptionIds: ["a", "c"] },
|
|
})).toBe("Confirmed 2 of 3 options");
|
|
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary({
|
|
...base,
|
|
status: "accepted",
|
|
result: { version: 1, outcome: "accepted", selectedOptionIds: [] },
|
|
})).toBe("Confirmed with no options selected");
|
|
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary({
|
|
...base,
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: { version: 1, outcome: "stale_target" },
|
|
})).toBe("Selection expired after target changed");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("maps selected checkbox option ids back to labels", () => {
|
|
const labels = getCheckboxConfirmationSelectedLabels({
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Pick items",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "a", label: "Alpha" },
|
|
{ id: "b", label: "Bravo" },
|
|
{ id: "c", label: "Charlie" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
result: { version: 1, outcome: "accepted", selectedOptionIds: ["c", "a", "missing"] },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(labels).toEqual(["Charlie", "Alpha"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("allows only safe confirmation target hrefs for rendering", () => {
|
|
for (const href of [
|
|
"https://example.com/checklist",
|
|
"http://example.com/checklist",
|
|
"/PAP/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
|
|
"#document-plan",
|
|
]) {
|
|
expect(normalizeRequestConfirmationTargetHref(href)).toBe(href);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const href of [
|
|
"file:///tmp/x",
|
|
"mailto:user@example.com",
|
|
"slack://channel?id=1",
|
|
"vscode://file/tmp/x",
|
|
"ftp://example.com/file",
|
|
"//evil.example/path",
|
|
]) {
|
|
expect(normalizeRequestConfirmationTargetHref(href)).toBeNull();
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("does not return unsafe custom target hrefs from accepted payloads", () => {
|
|
expect(getRequestConfirmationTargetHref({
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "custom",
|
|
key: "unsafe-target",
|
|
label: "Unsafe target",
|
|
href: "file:///tmp/x",
|
|
},
|
|
})).toBeNull();
|
|
|
|
expect(getRequestConfirmationTargetHref({
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "issue_document",
|
|
issueId: "issue-2",
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
href: "slack://channel?id=1",
|
|
},
|
|
})).toBe("/issues/issue-2#document-plan");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("maps stored option ids back to labels for answered summaries", () => {
|
|
const labels = getQuestionAnswerLabels({
|
|
question: {
|
|
id: "question-1",
|
|
prompt: "Pick options",
|
|
selectionMode: "multi",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "option-1", label: "Option 1" },
|
|
{ id: "option-2", label: "Option 2" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
answers: [
|
|
{
|
|
questionId: "question-1",
|
|
optionIds: ["option-2", "option-1"],
|
|
otherText: "A written answer",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(labels).toEqual(["Option 2", "Option 1", "Other: A written answer"]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("per-item verdict helpers", () => {
|
|
function verdictInteraction(
|
|
overrides: Partial<RequestItemVerdictsInteraction> = {},
|
|
): RequestItemVerdictsInteraction {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: "interaction-verdicts",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
...resolverPolicyFields,
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Review the posts.",
|
|
items: [
|
|
{ id: "a", label: "A" },
|
|
{ id: "b", label: "B" },
|
|
{ id: "c", label: "C" },
|
|
],
|
|
verdicts: ["approve", "reject"],
|
|
requireReasonOn: ["reject"],
|
|
},
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
} as RequestItemVerdictsInteraction;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it("counts decided items and lists still-pending ids in payload order", () => {
|
|
const progress = getItemVerdictProgress({
|
|
payload: verdictInteraction().payload,
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "resolved",
|
|
complete: false,
|
|
items: [
|
|
{ id: "a", verdict: "approve", resolvedByUserId: "u", resolvedAt: "2026-04-06T12:01:00.000Z" },
|
|
{ id: "c", verdict: "reject", reason: "no", resolvedByUserId: "u", resolvedAt: "2026-04-06T12:01:00.000Z" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(progress).toMatchObject({ total: 3, decided: 2, approved: 1, rejected: 1, deferred: 0 });
|
|
expect(progress.pendingItemIds).toEqual(["b"]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("summarizes pending, complete, and superseded verdict cards", () => {
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary(verdictInteraction())).toBe("0 of 3 decided");
|
|
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary(verdictInteraction({
|
|
status: "answered",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "resolved",
|
|
complete: true,
|
|
items: [
|
|
{ id: "a", verdict: "approve", resolvedByUserId: "u", resolvedAt: "2026-04-06T12:01:00.000Z" },
|
|
{ id: "b", verdict: "approve", resolvedByUserId: "u", resolvedAt: "2026-04-06T12:01:00.000Z" },
|
|
{ id: "c", verdict: "reject", reason: "no", resolvedByUserId: "u", resolvedAt: "2026-04-06T12:01:00.000Z" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
}))).toBe("3 decided · 2 approved · 1 rejected");
|
|
|
|
expect(buildIssueThreadInteractionSummary(verdictInteraction({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "superseded_by_comment",
|
|
complete: false,
|
|
items: [],
|
|
},
|
|
}))).toBe("Verdicts expired after comment");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("isDegenerateAskUserQuestions", () => {
|
|
function askInteraction(
|
|
questions: AskUserQuestionsQuestion[],
|
|
): AskUserQuestionsInteraction {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: "interaction-ask",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
...resolverPolicyFields,
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
payload: { version: 1, questions },
|
|
} as AskUserQuestionsInteraction;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it("flags a card with zero questions", () => {
|
|
expect(isDegenerateAskUserQuestions(askInteraction([]))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("flags a question with a blank / whitespace-only prompt", () => {
|
|
expect(isDegenerateAskUserQuestions(askInteraction([
|
|
{
|
|
id: "q1",
|
|
prompt: " ",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "a", label: "A" },
|
|
{ id: "b", label: "B" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
]))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("keeps a single fixed-option question: it is answerable (select + submit)", () => {
|
|
// A lone fixed option is still resolvable — the user selects it and submits —
|
|
// so it must render. Hiding it would strand a pending interaction the
|
|
// assignee is waiting on.
|
|
expect(isDegenerateAskUserQuestions(askInteraction([
|
|
{
|
|
id: "q1",
|
|
prompt: "Test",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
options: [{ id: "a", label: "A" }],
|
|
},
|
|
]))).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("flags a question with no options at all", () => {
|
|
expect(isDegenerateAskUserQuestions(askInteraction([
|
|
{ id: "q1", prompt: "Anything?", selectionMode: "single", options: [] },
|
|
]))).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("keeps a legitimate yes/no question (2 options)", () => {
|
|
expect(isDegenerateAskUserQuestions(askInteraction([
|
|
{
|
|
id: "q1",
|
|
prompt: "Ship it?",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "yes", label: "Yes" },
|
|
{ id: "no", label: "No" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
]))).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("keeps a multi-select question (>= 2 options)", () => {
|
|
expect(isDegenerateAskUserQuestions(askInteraction([
|
|
{
|
|
id: "q1",
|
|
prompt: "Pick platforms",
|
|
selectionMode: "multi",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "web", label: "Web" },
|
|
{ id: "ios", label: "iOS" },
|
|
{ id: "android", label: "Android" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
]))).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("keeps a question whose only choice is a first-class free-text option (PAP-419)", () => {
|
|
expect(isDegenerateAskUserQuestions(askInteraction([
|
|
{
|
|
id: "q1",
|
|
prompt: "Describe your goal",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
options: [{ id: "other", label: "I'll describe it", freeText: true }],
|
|
},
|
|
]))).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("is degenerate only when EVERY question is degenerate", () => {
|
|
// One real question keeps the whole card, even next to a degenerate one
|
|
// (here: a question with no options and no free-text).
|
|
expect(isDegenerateAskUserQuestions(askInteraction([
|
|
{ id: "q1", prompt: "Anything?", selectionMode: "single", options: [] },
|
|
{
|
|
id: "q2",
|
|
prompt: "Ship it?",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "yes", label: "Yes" },
|
|
{ id: "no", label: "No" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
]))).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("ignores non-ask_user_questions interactions", () => {
|
|
const confirmation = {
|
|
id: "interaction-confirm",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
...resolverPolicyFields,
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
payload: { version: 1 },
|
|
} as unknown as IssueThreadInteraction;
|
|
expect(isDegenerateAskUserQuestions(confirmation)).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("isSupersededByNewerSiblingInteraction", () => {
|
|
function askInteraction(overrides: Partial<AskUserQuestionsInteraction>): AskUserQuestionsInteraction {
|
|
return {
|
|
id: "interaction-ask",
|
|
companyId: "company-1",
|
|
issueId: "issue-1",
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
...resolverPolicyFields,
|
|
createdAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-04-06T12:00:00.000Z",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
questions: [{ id: "q", prompt: "t", selectionMode: "single", options: [{ id: "L", label: "L" }] }],
|
|
},
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
} as AskUserQuestionsInteraction;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it("hides an expired card superseded by a newer sibling question", () => {
|
|
const interaction = askInteraction({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
expirationReason: "superseded_by_newer_interaction",
|
|
supersededByInteractionId: "interaction-newer",
|
|
summaryMarkdown: null,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(isSupersededByNewerSiblingInteraction(interaction)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(shouldHideInteractionCard(interaction)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("never hides a still-pending card (would strand the assignee)", () => {
|
|
// Guards the PAP-424 / 00b136f45 invariant: a pending question must always
|
|
// render even if the result somehow already names a superseding sibling.
|
|
const interaction = askInteraction({
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
expirationReason: "superseded_by_newer_interaction",
|
|
supersededByInteractionId: "interaction-newer",
|
|
summaryMarkdown: null,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(isSupersededByNewerSiblingInteraction(interaction)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(shouldHideInteractionCard(interaction)).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("keeps the stale notice for a comment-superseded card (does not hide it)", () => {
|
|
const interaction = askInteraction({
|
|
status: "expired",
|
|
result: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
|
|
commentId: "11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111",
|
|
summaryMarkdown: null,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(isSupersededByNewerSiblingInteraction(interaction)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(shouldHideInteractionCard(interaction)).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("still hides a degenerate card through the combined predicate", () => {
|
|
const degenerate = askInteraction({
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
result: null,
|
|
payload: { version: 1, questions: [] },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(isSupersededByNewerSiblingInteraction(degenerate)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(shouldHideInteractionCard(degenerate)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|